Category: Middle East & Africa

  • Turkey Plays Increasingly Active Role in Middle East Diplomacy

    Turkey Plays Increasingly Active Role in Middle East Diplomacy

    By Dorian Jones
    Istanbul
    20 August 2008

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad (L) and his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul in Istanbul, 14 Aug 2008

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit to Istanbul last week is seen as part of Ankara’s increasingly active role in the Middle East, after decades of passivity in the region. At the same time, some analysts say, Turkey’s ties to the West are deteriorating as its path to European Union membership continues to run into roadblocks. For VOA, Dorian Jones reports from Istanbul.

    Turkey is now emerging as an important diplomatic actor in the Middle East. Over the past few years, Ankara has established close ties with Iran and Syria, with which it had tense relations during the 1980s and 1990s; adopted a more active approach toward the Palestinians’ grievances; and improved relations with the Arab world more broadly.
    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad (L) and his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul in Istanbul, 14 Aug 2008
    Analysts are saying Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit to Turkey further proves the ties between the two countries and the region are getting warmer.

    But Gokhan Cetinsaya, a professor of international relations at Istanbul Technical University, says there is more behind the warming of relations. Ankara’s agenda, he says, is being dictated by the ruling Islamic-rooted Justice and development party, the AKP.

    “According to AKP foreign policy doctrine, Turkey with it strategic depth, Turkey with its geographic depth, Turkey’s with its economic power, military power … should certainly play a leading role in the region including the Middle East. Turkey should play a part in Africa and should play a part in central Asia, the Balkans, etc. Turkey should become a global power in the long run,” Cetinsaya said.

    The AKP’s agenda is in sharp contrast to recent administrations whose sole priority was joining the European Union. The founder of the secular Turkish Republic, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk pushed a policy of turning his country’s back on the east and orientating it towards Europe in his bid modernize Turkey.

    Critics argue that Turkish officials’ frequent visits to Arab and African nations has given them little time to court Europe’s leaders in Turkey’s bid to join the European Union. In addition, Turkey’s relations with the United States have become increasingly strained, largely because of the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

    As a result, Turkey is now in the unprecedented situation of having poor relations with the EU and the United States simultaneously – a position seen by some analysts as turning their backs on the West.

    But, Akif Emre a columnist for the pro Islamic daily Yeni Safak, disagrees.

    “Given a choice, Turkey would be more close with Russia, India and China. Even the Islamic world,” Emre said. “That doesn’t mean Turkey would break all relationships with the West. They are looking for some new power to balance [its] European Union relationship.”

    The current holder of the EU presidency, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, was elected on a platform of opposing Turkey’s bid for EU membership. Such opposition has taken it toll on the Turkish public’s attitude toward Europe.

    On the streets of Istanbul, this woman’s view is typical.

    “They don’t want us, because [of] culture, religion, living style. It is all about us,” she said. “This shows prejudice to our country but I believe Turkey does not need the European Union to be a powerful or strong country.”
    Recep Tayyip Erdogan (file)
    Also contributing to the waning public support of EU membership are important domestic changes in Turkish society. The pro-Western elite that has shaped Turkish foreign policy since the end of World War II is gradually being replaced by a more conservative, more religious, and more nationalist elite that is suspicious of the West. This group has a more positive attitude toward Turkey’s Ottoman past. The ruling Islamist Justice and Development Party, or AKP, headed by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has managed to tap into rising popular nationalism by fusing it with Islam.

    But the AKP party has run into problems recently when it narrowly escaped being shut down by the country’s constitutional court last month on the charge of undermining the secular state. Since then, there has been a marked change in government policy towards the EU membership process. According to Sabiha Senyucel of the Turkish political think tank Tesev.

    “If you want to save your self in the country then the EU is your only guarantee for you,” Senyucel said. “The AKP knows very well that, If they don’t get back track with the EU process, if they don’t continue their commitment with the EU process, they are going to lose their support from the intellectuals circles and from the business circles.”

    Recent opinion poll numbers show there has been an upsurge in support of EU membership especially amongst government supporters. International relations expert Mensor Akgun says there is now understanding within the government that the process of EU membership is more important than the outcome.

    “They may not want us , but that does not matter as long as we fulfill the necessary requirements,” Akgun said. “As long as we become a fully democratic country with all the human rights observed, then I don’t think it matters lot, whether EU accepts or not.”

    Prime Minister Erdogan has pledged that he will re-energize his government’s efforts to join the EU. Honoring that promise is seen by critics as a crucial test of the government’s commitment to protect the secular state. Another test, analysts say, will be whether the AKP will again make Europe its diplomatic priority.

    Source : Voice of America

  • McCain Attacks Obama’s Support For Israeli Peace Negotiations

    McCain Attacks Obama’s Support For Israeli Peace Negotiations

    So the McCain campaign is attacking an Obama adviser, and former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer, for going to an American Bar Association conference in Damascus and calling on the Syrians to make peace with Israel. I guess to the McCain campaign, anyone that calls for peace through negotiations instead of “peace” through war is asking to be attacked. But this seems like a really dumb thing to do for two reasons.1. If McCain is attacking Kurtzer (and therefore the Obama campaign) for being an appeaser, doesn’t that mean that McCain also thinks that the Israelis are Chamberlin-like appeasers? The Israeli government is after all engaged in very public negotiations with Syria. In fact the Israeli military is one of the chief advocates of trying to negotiate a deal with Syria. Additionally, Assad recently had a very public meeting with Olmert and Sarkozy at the Mediterranean Conference where Olmert expressed hope that negotiations would develop. Does McCain oppose these efforts to negotiate peace? And if so doesn’t that once again put McCain squarely in line with the Bush administration.

    2. McCain himself once upon a time advocated talking to Syria. McCain is forgetting what he said about Colin Powell’s trip to Damascus five years ago. On the Today Show on April 18th 2003 McCain said that despite Syria being a state sponsor of terrorism, he was glad Powell was going there.

    LAUER: Let me ask you about Syria.

    Mr. McCAIN: Sure.

    LAUER: They have denied possessing weapons of mass destruction, they’ve also denied harboring any senior members of the Iraqi leader. The US administration says they have evidence to the contrary. How would you proceed with that situation?

    Mr. McCAIN: I think it’s very appropriate that Colin Powell is going to Syria. I think we should put diplomatic and other pressures on them. It’s also a time for Mr. Asad Bashar to realize that he should be more like his father was. I think he’s too heavily influenced by a lot of the radical Islamic elements and–and militant groups.

    LAUER: Do you think Syria meets the criteria set forth by the president in his post-9/11 address to Congress that they pose an imminent threat to the US in that they are either sponsoring or harboring terrorists?

    Mr. McCAIN: I think they’re–they’re sponsoring and harboring terrorists. I think they have been occupying Lebanon, which should be free and independent for a long time, but I don’t think that that means that we will now resort to the military action. We–we can apply a lot of pressure other than military–than the military action. So what I’m saying, we’re a long way away from it.

    LAUER: Under what circumstances–under what circumstances would you back military action?

    Mr. McCAIN: When we’ve exhausted all other options. And we have a lot of options to–to exercise. And I’m glad Colin Powell’s going there, but the Syrians have got to understand there’s a new day in the Middle East.

    Source :

  • Turkish energy minister to visit Iran

    Turkish energy minister to visit Iran

    ANKARA, Turkey – Turkey’s energy minister on Monday announced plans to visit Tehran to discuss investment in gas fields and a pipeline project in a rebuff to the United States, which opposes energy deals with Iran.Washington said a new energy deal between Iran and Turkey would send the wrong message while the West threatens economic sanctions against Tehran because of its refusal to halt uranium enrichment. The European Union and the United States believe Iran plans to develop nuclear weapons – a claim that Tehran denies.

    But the energy minister of Turkey’s Islamic-rooted government insisted that Turkey needs natural gas and has to “protect its own interests.”

    By SELCAN HACAOGLU

    Read full story

  • Turkey strongly condemns attack in Algeria

    Turkey strongly condemns attack in Algeria

    ANKARA, Aug. 20 (Xinhua) — Turkey on Wednesday strongly condemned the abhorrent terrorist attack in Algeria which took place on Tuesday and claimed more than 40 lives and left many others wounded.Turkish Foreign Ministry said in a statement, “in all its contacts at multilateral, regional and bilateral levels, Turkey has been stressing in the strongest terms that terrorism should be condemned regardless of its sources and pretexts, and be considered a crime against humanity.”

    “Turkey once again underlines the vital importance of effective international cooperation and solidarity in the fight against terrorism,” added the statement.

    The ministry said that Turkey extended its condolences to the families of the victims and the government and people of Algeria, and wished speedy recovery to those wounded.

    More than 40 people were killed and many others were injured in the terrorist attack in Issers district of Boumerdes, some 60 kilometers (35 miles) east of the capital of Algiers.

    Editor: Bi Mingxin

  • Turkey bows to the dark side

    Turkey bows to the dark side

    From the Los Angeles Times
    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s visit is a sign that the West can no longer take Turkey for granted as a staunch ally against Iran.

    By Soner Cagaptay

    August 19, 2008

    ISTANBUL, TURKEY — Praying in Istanbul’s Blue Mosque on Friday, I witnessed firsthand Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s international publicity coup.

    Ahmadinejad’s visit produced little in terms of substantive policy; the signing of a multibillion-dollar natural gas pipeline deal was put off. But Ahmadinejad got something just as valuable: a chance to spin his own image, court popularity and bash the United States and Israel.

    I’ve long been fond of the Blue Mosque because it is where, many years ago, I attended my first Friday prayers. Last Friday, though, I felt uncomfortable in the prayer hall, where I found myself in front of God but next to Ahmadinejad, who turned the ritual into a political show.

    Departing from established practice of having visiting Muslim heads of state pray in a smaller mosque in Istanbul, the government allowed Ahmadinejad to pray in the Blue Mosque, Turkey’s symbol of tolerant Ottoman Islam. With permission from Turkish authorities, he also allowed Iranian television to videotape him during the entire prayer, in violation of Islamic tradition, which requires quiet and intimate communion between God and the faithful. There was so much commotion around Ahmadinejad that the imam had to chide the congregants. Then, as he left the mosque, Ahmadinejad got out of his car to encourage a crowd of about 300 to chant, “Death to Israel! Death to America!”

    Even without this behavior, any visit from a leader representing an authoritarian, anti-Western autocracy would have created controversy in Turkey just a few years ago. Not today. The ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP, government not only opened the Blue Mosque to Ahmadinejad but accommodated his refusal to pay respects at the mausoleum of Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern, secular Turkey — a major violation of protocol for an official visit.

    In 1996, when Iran’s president, Hashemi Rafsanjani, refused to go to Ataturk’s mausoleum, snubbing Turkey’s identity as a secular pro-Western state, it led to a public outcry and sharp criticism of Iran. Relations soured. When the Iranian ambassador suggested a few months later that Turkey should follow Sharia law, he was forced to leave the country.

    This time, though, the AKP government has taken a different stance, playing down the diplomatic insult. It moved the meeting from the capital, Ankara, to Istanbul and labeled it a “working” meeting rather than an official visit. Yet all sorts of AKP officials flocked to Istanbul to meet with the Iranian president.

    Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan asked the Turkish public to ignore the snub and instead “focus on the big picture.” It is the “big picture,” though, that is most disconcerting. By extending an invitation to Ahmadinejad, the first such move by any NATO or European Union member country, Turkey has broken ranks with the West. The West can no longer take Turkey for granted as a staunch ally against Tehran.

    In the past, Turkey stood with the West, especially after the 1979 Islamist revolution in Iran. Also, Tehran gave refuge to the Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, which carried out terror attacks in Turkey from bases in Iran. Since the Iraq war began, however, Iran has shifted tactics to win Turkey’s heart. While the U.S. delayed taking action, Iran actually bombed PKK camps in northern Iraq.

    Meanwhile, since the AKP assumed power in Turkey in 2002, bilateral visits with Iran have boomed; Ahmadinejad’s trip crowns dozens of visits by high-level officials. Trade has boomed as well, increasing from $1.2 billion in 2002 to $8 billion today. And even though the two countries didn’t formalize the deal last week, plans are still going forward for a $3.5-billion Turkish investment in Iranian gas fields — this at a time when the West is adopting financial sanctions against Iran to cripple Tehran’s ability to make a nuclear bomb. If there were any doubts about a Turkish-Iranian rapprochement, they were laid to rest last week: During Ahmadinejad’s visit, the two countries agreed to make 2009 an “Iran-Turkey year of culture” — marked by regular cultural and political programs and exchanges — to bring the two countries closer.

    Ahmadinejad’s visit also speaks volumes about the future of Turkish-U.S. ties regarding Iran. According to a recent opinion poll in Turkey, when asked what the country should do in the event of a U.S. attack against Iran, only 4% of respondents said Turkey should support the U.S., while 33% wanted to back Iran and 63% chose neutrality.

    As I shared the canopy of the Blue Mosque’s divine dome with Ahmadinejad, I could not help but ponder how far Turkish foreign policy has shifted since 2002. Before, Turkey picked allies based on shared values — democracy, Western identity, secular politics and the principle of open society — that appeared to reflect the Turkish soul. Iran has not become a pro-Western, secular democracy since 1996, nor have Tehran’s mullahs accepted gender equality or the idea of a free society. Yet Ankara has had a change of heart toward Tehran. Years from now, Ahmadinejad’s visit to Istanbul will be remembered as the tipping point at which the West lost Turkey, and Turkey lost its soul.

    Soner Cagaptay is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a visiting professor at Bahcesehir University in Istanbul.

  • Turkey: Suicide Car Bombing Injures 6 Police Officers

    Turkey: Suicide Car Bombing Injures 6 Police Officers

     
    August 19, 2008
    A suicide car bombing injured six police officers at a checkpoint in the southern Turkish province of Mersin on Aug. 19, Reuters reported, citing a report from CNN Turk. The bomber detonated explosives in his car after police began pursuing his vehicle and tried to stop him at the checkpoint. The six police officers were said to be slightly injured; the attackerʼs identity was not clear.