Category: Middle East & Africa

  • Women rights activist arrested in Iran

    Women rights activist arrested in Iran

    According to the news from Tabriz, Iran, Mrs Shahnaz Gholami, journalist, member of Iranian women journalist
    Association (RAZA) and women rights activist was arrested 09.11.2008 by The Ministry of Intelligence Service.

    Mrs Gholami is headeditor of “Azar Zan” weblog and had been jailed 5 years 1990-1995 in Tabriz prison due to her political activities and later she was jailed once more for a month on june 2008 for participating in Khordad 85 movement anniversary. She also has been tortured in jail.

  • A bloody day in the district of the Turkmen city of Tuz Khormatu

    A bloody day in the district of the Turkmen city of Tuz Khormatu

    On Thursday, 27th of November 2008, at about 4.30 pm. Mr. Abdulamir Huseyin Bektaş was a member of the Turkmen Municipal Council of Tuz Khurmato and Mr. Talib Ali was a member of the Supreme Islamic Council Representative in the village of Yengejeh which 4km west of Tuz Khormatu were assassinated by unknown gunmen.

    They died after their car was sprayed with bullets while they were leaving the Yengejeh village heading towards the Turkmen district of Tuz Khormatu.

    Their bodies were taken immediately to Tuz Khormatu hospital for identification. Then their bodies were transferred to Kirkuk for carrying out a post-mortem examination.

    In the meantime another set of unidentified gunmen cut off the road and seized a bus carrying workers travelling home from the poultry field which is located about 10 kilometres north of the of Tuz Khormatu. The gunmen immediately shot the bus driver and a worker. Both victims were Arabs from the district of Suleyman Bag.

    The gunmen were chased by the police and they were surrounded in a rural area near the village of Albu Sabah which is located about 5 km north of the district of Tuz Khurmato. Later on a statement was released by the chief police of Tuz Khormatu, Colonel Hussein Ali Rashid, “After an exchange of fire between the two parties, one of the gunmen blew himself up and the other terrorist was shot by the police. The rest of the terrorists managed to escape and 3 policemen were injured as a result”

  • ERDOGAN VISITS INDIA: BILATERAL TRADE AND TURKISH-ISRAELI-INDIAN ENERGY COOPERATION ON THE AGENDA

    ERDOGAN VISITS INDIA: BILATERAL TRADE AND TURKISH-ISRAELI-INDIAN ENERGY COOPERATION ON THE AGENDA

    By Saban Kardas

    Tuesday, November 25, 2008

    Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan visited India from November 21 to 24, against a background of growing economic ties between the two nations. Erdogan was the first Turkish prime minister to visit India since Bulent Ecevit’s visit in 2000. Erdogan met Indian President Pratibha Patil, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, and Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee. He visited India’s historical and cultural sites and technological centers and held meetings with Turkish and Indian businessmen (www.akparti.org.tr, November 21-24). 

    Turkish State Minister Mehmet Aydin, Minister of Industry and Trade Zafer Caglayan, and Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Hilmi Guler were part of the Turkish delegation. Earlier this year, Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan and Minister of State for the Economy Kursat Tuzmen visited India, and President Abdullah Gul is expected to go there in the first half of 2009. This busy diplomatic agenda, as the latest of Turkey’s ambitious openings to its neighboring regions, shows that the AKP government considers India a strategic partner and major market in East Asia (Cihan News Agency, November 20).

    Also accompanying Erdogan were a large number of Turkish businessmen who explored opportunities for joint projects with their Indian counterparts. The meeting was reminiscent of former President Turgut Ozal’s trips to Central Asia and the Balkans in the early 1990s, which helped facilitate the Turkish business community’s penetration into new markets, making the country more competitive in the global economy.

    Throughout his visit, Erdogan underlined the conditions that created a favorable environment for closer economic cooperation between the two countries. First, he noted that Turkey and India shared historical ties and that they had no current political problems with each other (Cihan News Agency, November 21).

    As a matter of fact, the Turkish people are sympathetic to the cause of the Kashmiri Muslims; and Turkey has traditionally maintained a close friendship with Pakistan, India’s archrival. Nonetheless, Turkey and India are not parties to a political dispute that might poison economic relations. Since the AKP government came to power in 2002, the trade volume between the two countries has almost quadrupled, reaching $2.6 billion in 2007 (Referans, November 19).

    Second, Erdogan emphasized Turkey’s role as a bridge between different continents and civilizations. He also said that Turkey, as a developing economy at the intersection of three continents, provided access to energy, trade and transportation routes, and major markets. He invited Indian businessmen to invest in Turkey and take advantage of the economic opportunities that Turkey provided (Anadolu Ajansi, November 21).

    Indian ambassador to Turkey Raminder S. Jassal spoke to Turkish journalists before Erdogan’s visit. His remarks, as well as those of other Indian politicians during Erdogan’s visit, clearly show that the Indians are aware of Turkey’s strategic position in the global economy. Echoing Erdogan’s positive views about the potential for improving bilateral relations, Jassal described Turkey as the “center of energy in the region.” He also outlined various projects that are currently under way as well as Indian companies’ plans to invest in Turkey (Today’s Zaman, November 18).

    Erdogan attended a Turkish-Indian business forum in New Delhi, which was sponsored by Turkey’s Foreign Economic Relations Council (DEIK). A report published by the DEIK on the status of trade and economic relations between Turkey and India noted that the major areas of cooperation were energy, tourism, and communications. Turkey seeks to attract a greater share of the increasing foreign investments of Indian firms. The report shows that Indian companies are interested in investing in mining, pharmaceuticals, construction, the automotive industry, energy, communications technology, and sugar production in Turkey. The report also pointed to trade inequality in bilateral relations: Turkey’s exports to India amounted to $545 million from January to September, while its imports reached $1.9 billion (Referans, November 19). It was noted, however, that since Turkey’s imports were mainly raw materials, the imbalance was not a major concern for the Turkish economy (Cihan News Agency, November 20).

    During his trip, Erdogan underlined both parties’ willingness to increase the trade volume to $6 billion by 2010. To this end, he said, the two countries had agreed to form a working group that would prepare the groundwork for the establishment of a free-trade zone between India and Turkey (www.ntvmsnbc.com, November 24).

    One spectacular joint project concerned energy transportation. India is eager to diversify its energy supplies and seek alternative routes to transport the oil it imports from Russia. Erdogan and Guler noted India’s interest in joining the Turkish-Israeli Med Stream project. The three countries had already started feasibility studies about connecting Turkey’s Ceyhan port to the Red Sea through a undersea pipeline and announced that the project might be completed by 2011 (Sabah, September 13). The project will carry Russian oil from the Turkish port of Samsun on the Black Sea to Ceyhan, feeding the Med Stream pipeline. This alternative could enable India to load Russian crude into tankers at an Israeli port. When the project is completed, it will reduce the transport time to India from 39 to 16 days, while cutting the shipping costs significantly. Guler added that he would meet his Israeli and Indian counterparts in the coming days to discuss this project further (www.cnnturk.com, November 24).

    The parties announced that they would increase cooperation in nuclear energy, which is significant given Turkey’s plans to build nuclear power plants and India’s experience in this area. They also noted their determination to join forces in fighting terrorism. Reflecting on their consensus on a broad range of issues, Erdogan said, “Turkey made a strategic decision to develop relations with India in all fields” (Zaman, November 23).

  • Obama’s Iraq Crisis

    Obama’s Iraq Crisis

    Editorial Commentary

    Scott Sullivan: Obama’s Iraq Crisis

    In addition to the financial crisis, Obama faces an emerging crisis in Iraq. The temporary stability of Iraq brought about by Operation Surge is vanishing. Iraq is moving towards partition and civil war, thanks to the Kurds. If Bush and Obama do not stop the Kurds in this coming week, the US occupation of Iraq will become a fiasco.

    Today’s Washington Post (23 Nov 08) carries a front page story about Kurdish imports of a large quantity of small arms directly from Bulgaria, bypassing the Baghdad ministries of Defense and Interior, which are the only government entities under Iraq’s constitution authorized to import weapons.

    Kurdish efforts to import weapons follow illegal Kurdish efforts to sign separate energy agreements with the international oil companies. Moreover, the Kurds are illegally expanding the size of the Iraqi Kurdish state. The Iraqi Kurds are sending units of the Kurdish peshmerga militia into Kirkuk, which the Kurds claim as part of their new independent state.

    In other words, the embryonic Kurdish state created by the US occupation of Iraq has become a “runaway train” that threatens to bring down Iraq as a whole via civil war. The Kurds will derail all of Obama’s careful planning for a 16 month strategy for leaving Iraq.

    Due to Kurdish aggression, Obama’s second most important task, after dealing with the financial crisis, is to deal with the Iraq crisis. Obama’s policy review should begin by rejecting the conventional wisdom of Obama’s transition team on Iraq that US forces play a positive role in Iraq and by rethinking Obama’s likely decision to retain Robert Gates as Defense Secretary.

    Obama’s transition team shares the conventional view with Gates that US forces play a constructive role in Iraq. Gates is convinced that US troops are essential to Iraqi stability and cannot be withdrawn under Obama’s 16 month timeframe, much less Governor Richardson’s six month exit timeframe,

    In contrast, Richardson’s view is that US forces in Iraq, by supporting Kurdish separatism, are destabilizing Iraq. Under Richardson’s view, Iraqi stabilization will be possible only if US forces are withdrawn from Iraq as quickly as possible, most likely on Richardson’s six month exit timeframe. Gates is wrong, while Richardson is right.

    In sum, Obama faces two immediate tasks to deal with Iraq’s emerging crisis. First, Obama must call President Bush and remind Bush of his responsibility to deter the Kurds. Second, if Bush refuses to deter the Kurds, Obama should contact Biden, Clinton, Richardson and Jones so as to prepare for a six month timeframe for exiting Iraq.

    Of course, Obama could decide to take no action on Iraq until January 20. However, doing nothing is not an option for Obama. An Obama decision to do nothing to deter the Kurds would be seen by the Kurdish leadership as Obama’s approval for Kurdish imperialism and extremism. Does Obama want to go down in history, along with Bush, as the father to the new Kurdish superpower in the Middle East?

    Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee and was the Senior Advisor for International Economics at the Crisis Management Center of the National Security Council, 1984 -1986. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.

    Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com. By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments on our letters page.

    Petroleumworld News 24.11.08

    Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

  • Lebanese citizen allegedly spied for Israel

    Lebanese citizen allegedly spied for Israel

    JERUSALEM (JTA)—A Lebanese citizen arrested for spying for Israel was trained by the Mossad, according to a Lebanese newspaper.

    Ali Jarrah traveled to Israel for one or two days at a time for espionage training and would provide the Mossad with information, the Al-Akhbar daily reported in its Tuesday edition.

    Lebanese security sources believe Jarrah, who they say was recruited in 1982, may have been involved in the assassination of Hezbollah chief Imad Mugniyeh.

    Hezbollah arrested Jarrah in July, the newspaper reported.

    Source: jta.org, November 18, 2008

  • Iran claims Israel spy ring broken

    Iran claims Israel spy ring broken

    • The Guardian, Tuesday November 25 2008

    Iran’s revolutionary guards ratcheted up the war of nerves with Israel yesterday by claiming to have broken a spy network run by Mossad, the Israeli espionage agency.

    The guards’ commander-in-chief, Muhammad Ali Jafari, said they had arrested Israeli-trained agents and seized hi-tech communications equipment.

    Two days ago, Iran announced it had hanged a businessman who allegedly admitted spying for Israel.

    Jafari said the latest group arrested had confessed to having been trained in Israel to carry out assassinations and bombings. He did not specify how many people had been held. But he told the semi-official news agency Mehr that the group had sought information about the revolutionary guards, military intelligence officials and Iran’s nuclear programme, which Israel and the west fear is designed to produce an atomic bomb.

    Mossad had provided money to buy cars and equipment, said Jafari. “The arrested people confessed that they have been specially trained in Israel for bombings and assassinations.” Iran routinely accuses Israel and the US of spying against it, but yesterday’s allegation was the latest in a string of such claims in recent days.

    Ali Ashtari, 45, whose execution was announced on Saturday, was the manager of a company selling communication and security equipment to the Iranian government. The Iranian authorities said he had admitted during a trial last June to spying for Mossad for three years. They claimed he had been recruited to intercept the communications of officials working on military operations and the nuclear programme. Israel has denied the claims.

    Similar allegations have also been made against a prominent Iranian blogger, Hossein Derakhshan. Jahan News, a website close to Iran’s intelligence services, reported that he had been arrested last week. Jahan said Derakhshan had confessed in custody to spying for Israel.

    Source: www.guardian.co.uk, November 25 2008