Category: Middle East & Africa

  • Israel May Retaliate Against Turkey

    Israel May Retaliate Against Turkey

    Harut Sassounian

    Posted January 13, 2009 | 06:51 PM (EST)

    Israel May Retaliate Against Turkey by Recognizing the Armenian Genocide

    Enraged by the abrasive tone of Turkey’s condemnation of Israel’s attack on Gaza, Israeli officials and Turkish analysts are now raising the possibility that Tel Aviv may retaliate either by recognizing the Armenian Genocide or refusing to help Turkey to lobby against a congressional resolution on the genocide.

    This unexpected turn of events was in response to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan’s continued harsh criticisms, accusing Israel of “perpetrating inhuman actions which would bring it to self-destruction. Allah will sooner or later punish those who transgress the rights of innocents.” Erdogan qualified Israel’s attack on Gaza as “savagery” and a “crime against humanity.” He also refused to take calls from Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and rejected a request by Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni to visit Ankara.

    Israel initially downplayed the hostile comments emanating from Turkey. The Jerusalem-based DEBKAfile reported that “a deep crisis in Turkish-Israel relations appears to be the first strategic casualty of Israel’s offensive to suppress Hamas’ rocket campaign.” An Israeli Foreign Ministry official told Turkey’s ambassador to Israel that such harsh words were “unacceptable” among friendly nations. Another Israeli official added: “It would be necessary to evaluate the damage to the relationship that these [Erdogan’s] comments have caused.”

    In a January 5 editorial, the Jerusalem Post escalated the level of Israeli displeasure by questioning Turkey’s credibility on passing judgment on other countries: “On balance, we’re not convinced that Turkey has earned the right to lecture Israelis about human rights. While world attention focuses on Gaza, Turkish jets have bombed Kurdish positions in northern Iraq. Over the years, tens of thousands of people have been killed as the radical PKK pursues its campaign for autonomy from Turkey. Kurdish civilians in Iraq complain regularly that Ankara’s air force has struck civilian areas where there is no PKK activity. The next Israeli government should weigh whether Israel can accept as a mediator a country that speaks, albeit elliptically, of our destruction. Meanwhile, if Turkey persists in its one-sided, anti-Israel rhetoric, the Foreign Ministry might consider recalling our ambassador in Ankara for consultations.”

    Finally, Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Majalli Whbee angrily lashed back at the Prime Minister of Turkey. Several Turkish media outlets quoted Whbee as stating: “Erdogan says that genocide is taking place in Gaza. We [Israel] will then recognize the Armenian related events as genocide.” Whbee, a member of the Israeli Knesset and a close confidante of Prime Minister Olmert, issued the following warning to Turkey: “We, as Israel, hope that Prime Minister Erdogan’s statements will not damage our relations. But, if Turkey does not behave fairly, this will have its consequences.”

    While it is unlikely that Israel would reverse its long-standing refusal to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, it may decide not to accommodate future Turkish requests to have American Jewish organizations to lobby against a congressional resolution on the Armenian Genocide.

    Commentator Yigal Schleifer explained in his EurasiaNet article that Erdogan may “find himself walking a tightrope when it comes to distancing Turkey from Israel. Ankara has long depended on Israel to act as a conduit to Washington and to American Jewish organizations who have frequently acted as a kind of surrogate lobby for Turkey in Washington. In the past, Jewish organizations have been instrumental in helping Turkey block efforts to introduce resolutions in Congress recognizing the Armenian genocide of 1915. ‘There is real anger with Erdogan on Capitol Hill and among people who follow Turkey in Washington,’ says a Washington-based consultant who closely monitors Turkish affairs. ‘Nobody is threatening anything right now, or knows if there are going to be repercussions, but this is going to have an effect.’ Adds the consultant: ‘There is a sense that Erdogan has used up a lot of good will.’”

    The Turkish newspaper, Hurriyet, in a January 9 editorial, tried to downplay the consequences of the Turkish anger at Israel, by stating that the latter hopes “the Jewish lobby in the United States…will ensure, through its clout on issues such as preventing Armenian genocide bills, that Turkey falls in line…. It is suggested that if Turkey does not fall in line, that same lobby will punish her by refusing to help on this score, or even by ensuring that such bills pass.”

    Turkish columnist Barcin Yinanc described in Hurriyet the absurd situation Turkish leaders will find themselves in a couple of months: “When April comes, I can imagine the [Turkish] government instructing its Ambassador to Israel to mobilize the Israeli government to stop the Armenian initiatives in the U.S. Congress. I can hear some Israelis telling the Turkish Ambassador to go talk to Hamas to lobby the Congress. Erdogan’s harsh statements against Israel have certainly not gone unnoticed in Israel…. I am sure the Israeli government as well as the Jewish lobby in America will not forget these statements.”

    Turkish leaders may wish to remember that the last time they irritated a prominent Jewish-American congressman, he retaliated by supporting congressional action on the Armenian Genocide. Cong. Tom Lantos, a Holocaust survivor and a staunch opponent of the recognition of the Armenian Genocide, surprised everyone in 2005 when he voted in favor of a congressional resolution on the Armenian Genocide in the House International Relations Committee. Lantos disclosed that he was backing the Armenian resolution in order to teach the Turks a lesson for not supporting the U.S. on the eve of the Iraqi War.

    In the coming days, Turkey’s relations with Israel may further deteriorate as Turkish politicians, journalists, and leaders of non-governmental organizations urge Erdogan to go beyond mere words and expel Israel’s Ambassador from Ankara, recall Turkey’s Ambassador from Tel Aviv, cancel all military and economic agreements with Israel, and ban overflights by Israeli pilots in Turkish airspace. Erdogan may resort to such punitive actions in order to appease widespread anti-Israel anger by large segments of the Turkish public prior to local elections which are critical for his ruling political party.

    +

    ======================  COMMENTS ———————–

    Anoosh

    Don’t the actions of both Turkey and Israel strike anyone else as disturbingly hypocritical? First Erdogan has the unmitigated audacity to complain that through its actions in Gaza, Israel is violating the bibical commandment that “Thou shalt not kill.” Now isn’t that calling the kettle black? The Turkish nation commits a genocide on those members of its population that were Armenian, murders 1.5 million innocent souls and dispossesses an entire nation. Erdogan and his ilk continue the perpetration of this unfathomable crime by denying that it happened and disgracing and dishonoring the dead…and he now storms out of a meeting because of Israel’s actions.

    Israel, on the other hand, itself the home to genocide victims, refuses the acknowledge the truth about the Armenian Genocide and formally reocognize it for what it is. Moreover, Israel and Jewish American organizatons actively lobby against US Congressional recognition of the Armenian Genocide because of Israel’s “strategic relationship” with Turkey. And now Israel, too, has the audacity to threaten Turkey with Armenian Genocide recognition unless Turkey shapes up and follows the party line. Its simply disgusting. Israel, more than almost any other nation, should be at the forefront of recognizing the Armenian Genocide.

    What ever happened to just doing the correct and moral thing?

    Posted 08:51 PM on 02/01/2009

    – + gageeandbaba

    OMG those Israeli’s are something else. please pass this on b/c this is proof. NO MORE OF OUR TAX MONEY FOR ISRAEL!

    Posted 09:53 PM on 01/13/2009

    – + alexa07

    Why can’t the Turks speak up against what is happening to the Palestinians in Gaza? Are you really suggesting they should be blackmailed into silence by AIPAC manipulative actions? I am ashamed of the American govt’s complicity in these atrocities that are occurring in Gaza. I applaud any nation who has the guts to speak up to the Israelis & say ENOUGH! Regardless of past events. Many nations, have shameful episodes in their history, whether they admit it or not. That doesn’t forbid that we can speak up today against the actions of the Israelis & use of our most ferocious American weapons on a captive population.

    Posted 09:39 PM on 01/13/2009

    – + akhinaten

    So Israel dictates the USA policy not only toward itself but also toward others.

    why have a congress when you can have a lobby. How long can this continue.

  • A cynical use of morality

    A cynical use of morality

    A cynical use of morality

    By Haaretz Editorial

    Two outrageous new developments have worsened the already tense
    relations between Israel and Turkey. Gen. Avi Mizrahi, the head of the
    Israel Defense Forces’ Ground Forces issued a tongue-lashing to
    Turkey’s prime minister to remind the country of past atrocities. It
    goes without saying that as an army man, Gen. Mizrahi is not tasked
    with formulating Israel’s foreign policy, nor does he appraise other
    countries. But even more grievous is the liberty he took to denounce
    and preach morality to a strategic ally, causing a stir in relations
    between Israel and Turkey.

    At the same time, Israel’s Foreign Ministry pulled out a long worn-out
    card, threatening to label the massacre of Armenians in 1915 as
    genocide. It is hard to believe that the Foreign Ministry had a sudden
    attack of morality regarding the Armenians. For years the ministry has
    avoided adopting the word holocaust or genocide regarding the massacre
    of Armenians, not only because Israel seeks to preserve its
    exclusivity over the word holocaust. Mainly, it knows that adopting
    the word genocide in the Armenians’ case would be tantamount to a
    diplomatic showdown with Turkey, one that would in all likelihood
    result in a severing of ties.

    This time the Foreign Ministry apparently decided that the Turkish
    prime minister’s blunt statements about Israeli policy deserve a
    fitting Israeli response, or at the very least the threat of such a
    response. The debate is not whether to define the killing of Armenians
    as genocide or a holocaust. This is a moral issue that obligates us to
    re-examine history and offer a value-based judgment. The criticism is
    aimed at Israel’s trying to make political use of the Armenian issue
    to “punish” Turkey for daring to be so insolent as to condemn the
    military operation, whose results are a matter of controversy even in
    Israel.

    Turkey is one of Israel’s most important allies even if its prime
    minister does not always express an understanding of our policies or
    resorts to insulting language.
    The Foreign Ministry’s main efforts
    should thus be geared toward containing the dispute and restoring the
    relationship to its proper course. If Israel seeks to alter its stance
    on the question of the murder of the Armenians, it would be wise to do
    so at a more appropriate time, from a worthy position of morality and
    not as a way to make threats. It shouldn’t happen whenever a
    disagreement erupts with Turkey.

    As for Gen. Mizrahi, perhaps the chief of staff should let his
    subordinates know when they are overstepping the bounds of their
    authority. In a different era, one would have expected the general to
    be relieved of his duties because of his comments.

  • Israeli army disowns general’s Turkey attack

    Israeli army disowns general’s Turkey attack

    The Israeli military on Saturday disassociated itself from remarks critical of Turkey made by one of its generals after Ankara described them as unacceptable and demanded an urgent clarification. Skip related content

    Related photos / videos

    Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan Enlarge photo

    The remarks by Major General Avi Mizrahi, commander of the Israeli army headquarters, followed a row sparked by Israel’s offensive in Gaza last month and contained “unacceptable claims and nonsense targeting our prime minister and our country,” the foreign ministry said.

    The Israeli ambassador to Turkey was summoned to the foreign ministry on Saturday and handed a note of protest, the statement said, adding that “the Israeli authorities were asked for an urgent clarification.”

    In Jerusalem, the Israeli army later issued a statement saying Mizrahi’s remarks were not representative of its views.

    “General Mizrahi said some things that might be construed as critical of Turkey. The army spokesman wishes to clarify that this is not the official position of the army.”

    On Friday, the Turkish media quoted Mizrahi as saying Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who vehemently criticised Israel‘s action in the Gaza Strip, “should first look in the mirror” and spoke about Ottoman massacres of Armenians during World War I and the Kurdish conflict in Turkey.

    The Turkish military also denounced Mizrahi’s remarks, saying they “distort the realities and are excessive, unfortunate and unacceptable.”

    Such comments “can harm national interests in relations between the two countries,” the statement said.

    “We expect the Israeli general staff, which we believe places importance on relations with the Turkish armed forces, to clarify the issue,” it added.

    The Gaza conflict has strained relations between Israel and Turkey, a predominantly Muslim non-Arab nation which has been the Jewish state’s main regional ally since the two signed a military cooperation accord in 1996.

    On January 29, Erdogan stormed out from a heated debate on the Gaza war at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland after clashing with Israeli President Shimon Peres.

    Before walking off, he said Israel committed “barbarian” acts in Gaza, told Peres that “you know well how to kill people” and lashed out at the audience for applauding the Israeli president’s emotional defence of the war.

    Mizrahi’s remarks reportedly came at an international conference in Israel on Tuesday in comments on Erdogan’s outburst, after which Israel had sought to defuse tensions, saying that relations would recover in time.

    Israel’s 22-day offensive on Islamist Hamas-controlled Gaza left more than 1,300 Palestinians dead and injured 5,300 others.

  • Report for Obama: How to Disarm the PKK

    Report for Obama: How to Disarm the PKK

    Academic Barkey from Lehigh University has prepared a report on conflict prevention in Kurdistan for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Bıa news centre – Washington

    12-02-2009


    Erhan ÜSTÜNDAĞ

    Professor Henri J. Barkey, chair of the International Relations department at Lehigh University, USA, has prepared a report entitled “Preventing Conflict over Kurdistan” for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    The report tells the new Obama administration that the Kirkuk issue is pressing. However, the priority must be the solution of Turkey’s domestic Kurdish issue.

    Kurdish issue needs to be handled with care

    The website of the Carnegie Endowment introduces the report, saying:

    “The invasion of Iraq has surfaced long-suppressed nationalist aspirations among the Kurds, most notably the emergence of the federal Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). If ignored or mishandled, Kurdish aspirations have the potential to ignite violence and instability in Iraq, as well as the region, at a particularly delicate time.”

    In the report, Barkey warns that US influence in the region will decrease if US forces withdraw from Iraq, one of the main promises of Obama’s election campaign. The academic suggests the following policies:

    • Break the deadlock between the Iraqi government and the KRG over oil and gas revenue sharing and refugee resettlement. This will go a long way toward rebuilding trust and preventing Kirkuk from becoming a flashpoint—the first priority for the United States.
    • Continue to support the federal system outlined in Iraq’s constitution and avoid any suggestion that Iraq be partitioned.
    • Solidify the dialogue between Turkey and the KRG through U.S. involvement. Warming relations between Turkey and the KRG would stabilize the region and aid in a smooth U.S. troop withdrawal.
    • Demobilize the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and encourage its fighters to disarm or defect under a joint political and military effort coordinated by the KRG, Turkey, and the United States.
    • Work with European allies to resolve Turkey’s internal Kurdish disputes. Supporting Turkey’s counterterrorism program and its bid for EU accession, and providing development assistance in Turkey’s Kurdish regions would allow the U.S. and Europe to address problems from both sides.

    Barkey warns that the leftist and rightist nationalist movements in Turkey, as well as the army, need to be convinced to accept Iraq’s federal structure.

    Amnesty and disarmament in Turkey

    As far as PKK disarmament is concerned, Turkey must issue an amnesty. PKK militants should hand their arms over to the US, with Turkey monitoring the process. He believes that a transparent disarmament process would help to get public opinion to support it. As for the leadership of the PKK, they must be allowed to leave the region safely.

    Following these steps, so Barkey, Iraqi Kurds would have to announce that they would not tolerate any remaining PKK presence, and the KRG must control the area. US military support might be available at this point.

    Barkey argues that Europe must also take part in this process, and that the PKK must dissolve PJAK, the Iranian branch of the PKK.

    He also believes that US and European leaders should have direct contact with nonviolent Kurdish leaders in Turkey.

    The report was introduced at a panel moderated by Marina Ottaway. Barkey discussed the report with Qubad Talabani, a representative of the KRG, and Ian Lesser of the German Marshall Fund.(EÜ/AG)

    Source: bianet.org, 12.02.2009

    Full text is HERE

  • DUIN: Jews, Kurds linked

    DUIN: Jews, Kurds linked

    Bu konu aylardır ortalıkta… Ignatius’un Washington Times’ının bu kritik dönemde attığı başlık çok ilginç… Tam bir kaç gün sonraya denk geliyor. Makale ile başlık birbirine uymuyor sanki. Zorlama var. Ateist Yahudilerle Marksist Kürtler arasındaki genetik bağ safsatasını eklemeyi unutmuş… Ya da Kral Süleymanın 400-500 adamının Avrupadan kaçırıp getirdiği Avrupalı bakire kızlara zorla sahip çıkmaları sonucu bu zorla elde etmeden üreyen çocuklara “Kurd” denildiği gibi folklorik detayları da unutmuş…*

    Haluk Demirbag

    Julia Duin
    Thursday, February 5, 2009

    Much has been written over the ages as to what happened to the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel.

    The answer is simple, says Ariel Sabar, author of the recent book “My Father’s Paradise: A Son’s Search for His Jewish Past in Kurdish Iraq.”

    “The Bible tells you where they were deposited,” he says. “If you map those places, they are basically Kurdistan.”

    The exiles merged with the local culture, took on Kurdish dress and customs while retaining their Aramaic language, the lingua franca of the known world. Beginning in 722 B.C., Aramaic was the English of its day and the language spoken by Jesus Christ. The Assyrians, then the Babylonians, then the Persians embraced it as their official language.

    Despite the Islamic conquest in the seventh century, the Jews and the Christians of Iraq retained Aramaic. By the time the 20th century rolled around, 25,000 Jews still lived in the mountainous regions overlapping Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria. Many more lived in Baghdad, near ancient Babylon.

    Today, only eight Jews remain in Iraq. In 1951 alone, 120,000 left.

    What caused this exodus? The Muslim world, furious at the founding of Israel in 1948, turned on its Jews. Mr. Sabar writes through the eyes of his father, Yona Sabar, who was born in 1938 in Zakho, a city on the Harbur River, a few miles from Turkey and Syria.

    At the time, “Jews lived peaceably among Muslims and Christians,” his son told me. “It was a place that when people did try to stir hatred between religions, the Kurds would not stand for it.”

    I was in Zakho in 2004, so I remembered the extremely dry, mountainous terrain of the area, the blazing summer temperatures and the five-mile-long line of truckers waiting days to get through the Turkish border crossing.

    Yona Sabar was ripped from this life at the age of 13, when his family fled to Israel. He became a linguist skilled in teaching Aramaic, ending up as a professor at the University of Southern California. His facility aroused the attention of movie producers, who have asked him to dub in Aramaic everything from Jesus’ words “Lazarus come forth!” to the voice of the Almighty in the movie “Oh, God!”

    His son, now 37, was disinterested in his father’s unusual career until 2002, when he realized that most Aramaic-speaking Jews, now in their 70s and 80s, were dying off.

    If their story were to be told, it had to be now. He went to Zakho in 2005 and 2006, meeting people his father knew and trying to find a long-lost aunt who was kidnapped by Bedouins back in the 1930s.

    I called the author, happy to find someone who was as entranced with that mysterious area of the world as I was.

    “I show up at book talks, and someone in the audience, about my age, says, ‘My father was an Iraqi Jew, or my father was a Kurdish Jew, and I had no idea we had this rich heritage,’ ” Mr. Sabar says. “It’s cool to see people gain access to a culture they’ve cut themselves off from or there hasn’t been a whole lot written about.”

    He didn’t want his biography “to be just a Jewish book,” he adds. “I thought parts of it would appeal to evangelical Christians and people who care about the Middle East and the Kurds. Many Muslim Kurds have e-mailed me to say, ‘Thank you for appreciating our culture. No one in America understands us.’ ”

    • Contact Julia Duin at [email protected].

    – Julia Duin is the Times’ religion editor. She has a master’s degree in religion from Trinity School for Ministry (an Episcopal seminary) and has covered the beat for three decades. Before coming to The Washington Times, she worked for five newspapers, including a stint as a religion writer for the Houston Chronicle and a year as city editor at the Daily Times in Farmington, N.M. She has published four books. The latest, “Quitting Church: Why the Faithful Are Fleeing and What to Do about it,” was released Sept. 1. She has won many regional and national awards for her writing and has been nominated twice by the Times for a Pulitzer. She has covered events ranging from the election of Pope Benedict XVI in Rome and sex-selective abortions in India to the huge popularity of Christian colleges in the United States and a “new sanctuary” movement in mainline Protestant churches involving aid to illegal immigrants. She has learned seven foreign languages to aid in researching her stories.

    Source: washingtontimes.com, February 5, 2009

    *

    “Another legend in Middle Eastern Folklore … relates how King Solomon reigned over a supernatural world of demons and Djinns. He sent 500 of his most faithful subjects to Europe to abduct the 500 most beautiful young women they could find. On their return they found that the king had died, and so they kept the women for themselves; The product of this forced union was the Kurds. A similar account is  to be found in Jewish Folklore in which, the Kurds are said to be the descendants of devils who raped 400 virgins.”

    Source: “No Friends But The Mountains: The Tragic History Of The Kurds”, by John Bulloch & Harvey Morris, 1992 [Viking]

  • tension between Turkey and Israel

    tension between Turkey and Israel

    IDF: Officer’s criticism of Turkey does not represent official view
    By Barak Ravid and Yossi Melman, Haaretz Correspondents, and Reuters
    An Israel Defense Forces spokesperson on Saturday said that IDF Maj. Gen. Avi Mizrahi’s recent criticism of Turkey does not reflect the official position of the IDF.

    “While referring to the criticism of Israel by Turkey, Gen. Mizrahi made
    statements that could be interpreted as criticism of Turkey’s past,” said a statement by Brig. Gen. Avi Benayahu, a spokesman for the IDF.

    “The IDF spokesperson wishes to clarify that this is not the official position of the IDF.”

    Turkey earlier on Saturday called on Israel to explain remarks quoted in Haaretz by Mizrachi that questioned Turkish policies toward Kurds and Cyprus, saying ties between the Middle East allies could be at stake.

    The Turkish Foreign Ministry also on Saturday summoned Israeli Ambassador Gabby Levy to protest comments by Mizrahi, commander of Israel’s land forces.

    Mizrahi was quoted as saying Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan should have “looked in the mirror” before slamming President Shimon Peres last month at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

    Mizrachi also said that Turkey was not in a position to criticize Israel’s actions in the Palestinian territories when it stations troops in northern Cyprus.

    He also accused Turkey of repressing its Kurdish minority and massacring Armenians during World War I.

    The Turkish military said on Saturday that Mizrachi’s criticism threatened to harm relations between the two countries.

    The flap was the latest sign of tension between Turkey and Israel, who maintain close military ties but whose alliance has been strained by the Israeli offensive on Gaza.

    Erdogan accused Peres of “knowing very well how to kill” in a public debate last month at the World Economic Forum.

    The Turkish General Staff, in a statement carried by the state-run Anatolian news agency, said Mizrahi’s remarks were completely unacceptable.

    “The comments have been assessed to be at the extent that the national interests between the two countries could be damaged,” it said.

    Turkey and Israel’s military cooperation includes allowing Israeli jets to use Turkish airspace for training.

    Erdogan told Reuters on Friday there were no plans to halt that agreement.

    Turkey keeps about 30,000 troops in northern Cyprus after invading the island in 1974 to thwart a coup attempt by Greek Cypriots. It is the only country to recognize a Turkish Cypriot administration there.

    Turkey has also fought a 25-year war against Kurdish separatists seeking to establish a homeland in the southeastern part of the country.

    Turkey denies accusations that it committed genocide against 1.5 million Armenians during World War I.

    Related articles:

  • WATCH: Turkey PM storms off stage over Peres remarks on Gaza
  • Turkey PM: Israel election results paint ‘very dark picture’