Category: Syria

  • Syria mines Turkish border

    Syria mines Turkish border

    By ROY GUTMAN

    McClatchy Newspapers

    ON THE TURKISH-SYRIAN BORDER — The Syrian military in the past month planted a band of anti-personnel mines along stretches of the border with Turkey, where last year more than 10,000 Syrian refugees fled the Assad regime’s crackdown on the “Arab Spring” uprising, Syrian witnesses said.

    After a family of five reportedly died in a new minefield last month, Syrian civilians, operating with primitive means – an ax, a rope and the guidance of a volunteer who’d had mine-clearing training in military service – unearthed hundreds of those mines and reopened the way to safety, volunteers said.

    The mines were Russian made PMN-2 pressure mines. They consist of a green plastic casing and a black X-like pressure plate, which detonates the charge inside. They were laid about a foot apart in two bands that were set about two feet apart, just three or four yards from the fence that marks the border with Turkey, according to the volunteer who directed the mine-clearing operation.

    Tall and slight of frame, the volunteer, 28, who called himself Rajol al Hadidi, (“Iron Man”), left Syria one week ago carrying more than a dozen mines. He crossed into Turkey to seek the advice of military defectors in the Free Syrian Army on how to defuse the mines.

    “I know 10 sorts of mines – anti-personnel mines and anti-tank mines, but not this one,” he said. “We didn’t know what explosive material was contained in it, but we thought it would create a crater of 3 or 4 meters,” he said.

    But they were not able to advise him. In a meeting about a half mile from the Syrian border, Hadidi allowed a McClatchy reporter to photograph one mine – still fused – that he had removed from the new minefield.

    Some mine experts consulted by McClatchy said there is no way to defuse the PMN-2 other than to detonate it with a small explosive charge.

    Mines are usually deployed as defensive barriers. “Usually you can see them, especially if you know what you’re looking for, as they’re dug in shallow,” said Andy Smith, a British mine expert. “Most of the time, I don’t recommend trying to defuse them, because they’re not made to be defused.”

    Hadidi said he removed the first mine, using a technique he had learned in the military – placing the blade of an ax in front of the mine, attaching a 70-foot rope, and tugging at the ax to ease the mine out of the ground. When he saw that moving the mine did not detonate it, he trained four other civilian volunteers in mine removal, and together they lifted an estimated 300 mines, he said.

    The Syrian military had planted the mines in early to mid-February in olive groves for more than a mile along the border near Jisr al Shughur, Hadidi said. It was through this area that at least 10,000 residents of the town fled to Turkey last year, fearing an all-out onslaught by the government of President Bashar al Assad.

    Mines were also planted about 12 miles to the north, in Guvecci, according to Syrian army defector Tamar Fizo, who witnessed the mine-laying. This was a secondary crossing point for refugees fleeing Assad’s Syria into Turkey, but is no more.

    “We saw soldiers getting off trucks or armored cars and planting mines 20 meters (70 feet) from the border,” he said. The night after the minefield was laid, a wild boar detonated one and died, he said.

     

    In 1980, Hafez al Assad, father of the current president, targeted Jisr al Shughur and the better-known city of Hama, for a devastating crackdown to demonstrate that that the secular Baath party, which has ruled Syria for decades, would not tolerate a political role for the Muslim Brotherhood. That’s according to Ghawzan Issa, one of the elected representatives of the Jisr diaspora now housed in Turkish government refugee camps.

    Syria and Turkey mined their common border during the Cold War, but starting several years ago both began to remove mines as part of a drive by Turkey to improve relations with its neighbors. There were reports in November of the Syrian army laying mines along the Turkish and Lebanese borders, and injuries have been reported among refugees fleeing to Lebanon.

    Several months ago, the Associated Press quoted an unidentified Syrian official as saying the aim of the mines being laid then was to prevent armed insurgents from crossing into Syria.

    Mustafa Haid, a Syrian anti-government activist familiar with the mining issue, said the mines were intended to prevent refugees from escaping. The drive to flee Syria has taken on new drama after the military’s destruction last week of a section of Homs, where armed insurgents had taken control, and a new drive against villages near Jebel Al Zawieh, in the vicinity of Idlib, in northern Syria, which began on Saturday.

    In Guvecci and many other towns along the border, bombing of the villages around Idlib could be heard from about midnight until 10 a.m. Sunday morning, Fizo and other villagers said. “This was clearly done in advance of the Idlib operation in order to try and prevent Syrians from fleeing to Turkey,” Haid said.

    Although 235 Syrians escaped into Turkey Thursday night and early Friday, relatively few managed to cross the border Friday or Saturday night, anti-government activists said.

    Hadidi said that the military informed those residents of Jisr who hadn’t already fled that if they needed to go to the border area to tend their fields, they should approach the military first. He said it was the report of the deaths of a family of five, from the village of Salma, near Latakia, about two weeks ago, that led him to volunteer to remove the mines. They died trying to cross near the village of Al Hamboushieh, near Bdaama, according to locals..

    “You could see the disturbed earth. They were somewhat exposed,” Hadidi said.

    (Special correspondents Gul Tuysuz and Rami Suleiman in Antakya, Turkey, and David Enders in Beirut contributed to this report.)

    Read more here:

  • Mossad, CIA and Blackwater operate in Syria – report

    Mossad, CIA and Blackwater operate in Syria – report

    rebels

    A security operation in Homs reveals Mossad, CIA and Blackwater are involved in the military violence in this part of Syria, as over 700 Arab and Western gunmen and Israeli, American and European-made weapons were detained in Baba Amr district.

    Syrian security forces got yet further proof of Western powers’ military involvement in Syria’s internal conflict, reports Al-Manar, a news agency, affiliated with Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based militant group and political party.

    Around 700 gunmen were recently arrested in the former rebel stronghold of Babar Amr.

    “The captured gunmen held Arab nationalities, including Gulf, Iraqi, and Lebanese. Among them were also Qatari intelligence agents and non-Arab fighters from Afghanistan, Turkey, and some European countries like France,” the agency quotes Syrian expert in strategic affairs Salim Harba as saying.

    Harba also confirmed to the agency that “a coordination office was established in Qatar under American-Gulf sponsorship. The office includes American, French, and Gulf – specifically from Qatar and Saudi Arabia – intelligence agents, as well as CIA, Mossad, and Blackwater agents and members of the Syrian Transitional Council.”

    The Syrian expert also added the security forces have also seized Israeli-, European- and American-made weapons.

    “The Syrian army also uncovered tunnels and equipments there,” he told to the agency, “advanced Israeli, European, and American arms that have not yet been tested in the countries of manufacture, in addition to Israeli grenades, night binoculars, and communication systems were confiscated by the security forces.”
    Salim Harba however said the Syrian authorities are not planning to reveal all the obtained information now, but assured all the evidence is of high value.

    “The Syrian security forces have documents and confessions that could harm everyone who conspired against Syria, and could make a security and political change, not just on the internal Syrian level, but also on the regional level,” he said.

    The recent Stratfor leak and hacked email of the company’s director of analysis also suggest undercover NATO troops are already on the ground in Syria.

    There have been previous allegations of a Western presence on the side of the rebels as 13 French officers were reportedly captured by the loyalist forces earlier in March.

    President Bashar al-Assad has repeatedly claimed his regime is fighting not with peaceful protesters as claimed by the West, but with the military gangs supported by the West.

    Western powers however have categorically denied any military involvement in Syrian internal conflict.

    rt.com, 07 March 2012

  • Syrian generals flee to Turkey as dozens more killed

    Syrian generals flee to Turkey as dozens more killed

    Ten high-ranking military officers from Syria, including four brigadier-generals, have defected and crossed into Turkey to join the Free Syrian Army.

    Syrian children play soccer inside a refugee camp in Reyhanli, Turkey, on March 4, 2012 Gaia Anderson / AP  Read more:
    Syrian children play soccer inside a refugee camp in Reyhanli, Turkey, on March 4, 2012 Gaia Anderson / AP Read more:

    The news comes after Syrian government forces pressed on with deadly assaults on Friday, killing around 50 civilians, monitors said.

    The official Turkish news agency Anatolia said 10 officers from Damascus, Homs and Latakia crossed the border into Turkey’s southern province of Hatay.

    The Syrian deputy oil minister joined the opposition only one day earlier.

    A spokesman for the Syrian opposition group, the Higher Revolutionary Council, said a total of six brigadier generals, four colonels and a lieutenant colonel had changed sides in the past 48 hours.

    The newsagency said that Turkish authorities were establishing a container city near Hatay in preparation for an expected influx of Syrians fleeing the fighting in Idlib across the border.

    Village stormed

    Regime troops stormed a village in Idlib and attacked other districts there, reflecting growing fears that the north-western province will meet the same fate as the battered rebel stronghold of Baba Amr in the city of Homs.

    “Troops attacked the village of Ain Larose and opened fire killing 13 civilians,” said Rami Abdel Rahman, head of the Britain-based Syrian Observatory of Human Rights in Beirut.

    They were among nearly 50 people killed in the assaults in Idlib and elsewhere across the country by regime forces, including the rebel province of Homs where rocket and mortar attacks claimed 10 lives.

    Tens of thousands of people have demonstrated against the regime across the country, with huge rallies taking place in the second city Aleppo.

    Meanwhile, UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan will meet Syrian president Bashar al-Assad on Saturday on a peace mission to the troubled state, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon said.

    Mr Ban told reporters in New York that he held a conference call with Mr Annan and Arab League secretary-general Nabil Araby earlier on Friday.

    He said Mr Annan planned to leave Damascus on Sunday to visit other countries in the region.

    ABC/wires

    via Syrian generals flee to Turkey as dozens more killed – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation).

  • Janus-faced Turkey’s Syria Challenge

    Janus-faced Turkey’s Syria Challenge

    Janus-faced Turkey’s Syria Challenge

    2dd6544feaf90535634ad0a99d9a0ad7Niklas Anzinger: Turkey’s success story of combining moderate Islam and democracy is being challenged by the ruling AK Party’s power grab. In this game, the struggle for power trumps ideology, but the religious resurgence remains an element of unpredictability in foreign policy. Regarding Syria, reality mugged the ill-guided Middle Eastern adventures of Turkey.

    Democracy, secularism and Islam in Turkey are part of an immensely complex puzzle of identity, ideology and politics. The Islamic resurgence in Turkish society coincides with a major shift in the political establishment, the outcomes of which are: the rule of law under siege, authoritarian tendencies and ill-guided foreign policy adventures. Ignoring the nexus of the religious-secular label, a grab for power by the ruling AK Party poses severe challenges for Turkish democracy. Almost exclusively controlling political offices, AKP hosts different group interests; above all, the Islamist sect of Fethullah Gülen holds eminent positions of power in the media and education in the shadows of the state apparatus.

    The AKP rule is credited as a moderate Islamic-conservative alternative to obstacles to Turkish democracy – the deep state of the military and the traditional Kemalist elite. In fact, AKP’s power game has in several instances shown to dismiss constraints on the rule of law and its ideological apparatus is far from being moderate. Along with the constitutional amendments of September 2010 to widen the AKP’s influence in the judiciary branch, a pro-AKP media empire ensures the ruling class’s exclusive immunity. The “Ergenekon” case shows vividly the enormous deterioration of balances of power. Ergenekon refers to an alleged coup plot from 2003 involving media, academia, military and judiciary to topple the democratically elected government. Fabricated evidence, systematic media disinformation and massive violations of judicial independence allowed for the mass arrests of journalists, activists and military officers. Even elected parliamentarians, a total of 9 MPs (6 BDP, 3 CHP, 1 MHP), have been jailed on Ergenekon accusations.

    Economic growth, domestic power, and international cheering for the Turkish model increased the confidence of Turkish policymakers to look abroad. While Turkey was applauding and legitimizing the terrorist group Hamas and seeking common ground with the revolutionary Islamist, anti-Western axis of Syria and Iran, it looked like Islamist and neo-Ottoman perceptions had trumped the reality of being a considerably modern nation state integrated in the Western economic and security structure. Far from being a moderator in the Arab world, Turkey exploits the widespread anti-Israel sentiments for the benefit of appealing to the masses. Since the Davos affair in 2009 and the Gaza flotilla incident in 2010, the once close alliance between Israel and Turkey has disintegrated.

    The Turkish decision-makers in foreign policy, represented by Prime Minister Erdogan and Foreign Minister Davutoglu, may not share Western values, but the past has shown that Turkey and the Western states share interests, which often lead to considerable and warm cooperation.

    The outcome of the Arab Spring, especially the fighting and brutal crackdown in Syria, led once again to reality overcoming ideology. The “Middle Eastern PKK-circle”, as formulated by Soner Cagaptay, explains the situation: the Kurdish terrorist organization remains the most crucial aspect of Turkey’s security policy. The Syrian regime’s crackdown on protests let Turkey emerge as Syria’s key opponent because of Turkey’s alleged protector role of Sunni Muslims and the ongoing refugee influx from the Syrian border. Thus, “the more people Assad kills, the more hardline Turkey’s policies will become against Syria. This will, in turn, drive Iranian-Syrian action against Turkey through PKK attacks from Iraq”. In the short-run, what first began as counter-activities against US-EU policies on Iran may now ironically drive Turkey to be a major contributor to countering Iran’s hegemonic ambitions by toppling Iran’s main ally and weapon hub for Hamas and Hezbollah activities.

    Turkey appears as a Janus-face: a pragmatic, calculating Western NATO ally and an ideologically driven, power-grabbing bully. The process of domestic authoritarianism, assault on the free press, the rule of law and independence of the judiciary along with economic growth and emerging political relevance in the region paved the way for a new political elite that plays a game of power and ideology. The processes in the region are likely to lead to antagonisms between Turkey and the Western states, but the events in Syria could just as easily bind the two together.

    The Western states should make sure to keep control over important strategic resources. The US has to remain in control of the important Turkey-based NATO missile defense radar. Recently, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu announced that intelligence from the radar system will not be shared with Israel and that missile defense does not concern a specific country. Turkey wishes for Israel’s alienation from NATO military cooperation, but other NATO states should calm the Israel-Turkey relationship because both states are vital to NATO. Turkey’s stance towards Iran remains unclear and blurred, while NATO defense should be concerned with Iran and Syria. NATO Members must confront Turkey about the the country’s murky NATO agenda.

    In addition, the severe violations of democratic principles in the domestic sphere and the counter-productive foreign policy moves in the Middle East must be subject to international criticism. Turkish society has to be reminded and convinced of a mutually beneficial Western orientation, while EU decision-makers must concede failure in alienating Turkey from Europe.

    Niklas Anzinger is a student of Philosophy and Economics at the University of Bayreuth.

  • The truth about western media’s favourite Syrian “activist”: Danny Dayem

    The truth about western media’s favourite Syrian “activist”: Danny Dayem

    By Kevork Elmassian, Hiba Kelanee, Feeda Kardous and Zoubaida al Kadri

    Danny Dayem Oh boy Oh boy

    Danny Abdul Dayem is a 22 year old British citizen, of Syrian descent, from Cambridge. In the summer of 2011 he escaped the Syrian city of Homs to Egypt; and then moved to London for a few months. In December of 2011, he secretly returned to Syria through Lebanon. While in London, Danny performed many interviews with some media agencies, as an “eyewitness” from Homs, allegedly shot upon by the Syrian security forcesClearly, he was on a mission to take full advantage of the air time given him, to transmit propaganda of the idea of a “Syrian revolution”.  Instead of the reasonable quizzing and healthy skepticism, expected of a professional news entity, on Newsnight, Danny was given free reign to speak, unchallenged. The different accounts gave to numerous news channels, including Sky News, al Hiwar, Alarabiya (in Arabic) and the Guardian were somewhat alarming. Here are some of inconsistencies:
    BBC interview September 7 2011

    1. (At 00.08) Danny’s answer to the first question summed the intended message all up: “Yes, I’ve seenEVERYTHING”.

    2. (At 00.35 ) He shows a video that proves absolutely nothing

    3. (At 01.48)  He claims that: “three quarters of the shots are aimed and one quarter is just to scare people”. If this was true, tens of thousands of Syrian protesters would have lost their lives, rather than the reported, but unsubstantiated figure of 6000 provided by the western and GCC media.

    4. (At 02.34)  He tells Newsnight anchor Jeremy Paxman that a car stopped two meters behind him, and someone inside shot him. Yet, the bullet managed to “come right in his waist and out of his back”?

    5. (At 03.08)  Danny tells Jeremy that he was shot by a SINGLE bullet that went through his body and presumably left two scars.
    This Sky News report, clearly shows a single scar in the middle of Danny’s back.

    In this al Hiwar interview (at 13.50) (7) he tangles himself in even more knots when he shows the presenter TWOdressed wounds to the sides of his back.
    Adding even further confusion to the picture, the Guardian reported that Dayem had five stitches, in the hospital, on EACH wound!
    In his latest interview, on al Alarabiya, Danny reverts to the story of the single bullet that went through his waist and out his back. But at 00.15,  Danny speaks of his friend throwing him on the floor and then “standing up” in front of him to take three bullets!! We find it hard to imagine anybody who would do such a thing. Standing up in front of a car, two meters away, with “security/ shabeeha” inside it, most probably “aiming” at the two of them.
    Back to the Newsnight interview at 02.36 he tells Paxman that a  bomb exploded before he was shot. Then in the al Hiwar interview at 10.39 he told the presenter a bomb exploded before he was shot and another bomb exploded after he was shot. During the al Alarabiya interview at 00.50 Dayem adds that one person (from the al Khaznadar family) died, when the bomb exploded – something he did not mention in previous interviews.
    At 03.25:  There was no explanation offered as to why the mentioned car managed to drive away, although it took a mere five minutes for people to get to Dayem and his friend despite the sound of the shooting and the explosion of the grenade(s) he claimed was thrown at them. This suggests the alleged incident occurred in an isolated area. If those armed men were army or security personnel, what would frighten them in an isolated area after they had injured Dayem and his friend? Why were Dayem and his friend shot at in the first place? Why would they be shot at by security forces? According to Dayem, protesters were shot at when they went out on the streets, but  in his story this was not the case.
    At 03.58 if the aim of security/ “shabeeha” is to kill injured protesters who go to hospital for treatment; driving away in an isolated area does not seem like a better option than stopping and killing their victims.
    At 04.19: Dayem’s statements seems to change as he recounts his story: “They shoot at night and wait at hospitals in the morning… [and]… actually go at night to the hospitals too”.
    During the al Hiwar interview at 20.05:  he says that at first he was not asked about his wound, in the airport, and if he was then he would have told them it was a kidney operation. Seconds later, he goes on to say he told them it was an operation and that they let him go without any trouble.
    At 05.15 during his interview with Paxman, Dayem claims he told officials at the airport that he had a kidney operation.
    At 06.17 he says that the protests can’t stop because, “Bashar al Assad has got videos for every protester that is going out and will catch them one at a time”
    If the President and his security have videos of all protesters, how was it so easy for Dayem and his family to leave the country without harassment or hindrance by security?
    When Dayem was in London, a conversation happened between him and other Syrian youth on Facebook where he was told: “be careful Danny, the news channels are using you, this is their job, and they search for people like you to make some interviews! I’m telling you this, because I know how things work and I don’t want you to fall in this trap. You are the owner of yourself, don’t let the media plays with you, at the end, this is your country, and we are all Syrians, but the media has their own agendas and they are all pressured and directed by lobbies.”Dayem replied, “Thanks for the advice, but a friend is helping and he’s a lobbier”
    Danny describes his “political views” on Facebook as: “I think we should live peacefully like a fish”. However, he is certainly involved in helping and supporting the terrorist militia of the so-called “Free Syrian Amy”, who have conducted many terrorist attacks upon public and private entities including orchestration many explosions of oil pipelines bringing blackouts to large parts of the country, suicide attacks in Damascus and Aleppo and hung and beheaded many supporters of the government who spoke to observers from the Arab League. All of these incidents have been documented by this blog.
    Dayem hasn’t hidden his political agenda, and he clearly states that he wants US and Israel to intervene militarily in Syria to overthrow the Syrian regime.
    http://lizzie-phelan.blogspot.com/2012/02/truth-about-western-medias-favourite.html?m=1