Category: Israel

  • Turkey declares Israel ‘central threat’

    Turkey declares Israel ‘central threat’

    JERUSALEM (JTA) — Israel is seen as “a central threat to Turkey” in a policy paper written by Turkey’s National Security Council.

    At the same time, the security council removed Syria, Bulgaria, Georgia and Armenia, as well as Iran, from the list of countries that pose a threat to Turkey, according to Turkish media outlets cited late Saturday by the Israeli media.

    “The region’s instability stems from Israeli actions and policy, which could lead to an arms race in the Middle East,” the policy paper, known as The Red Book, reportedly said, according to Israel’s Channel 10.

    It was the first time that Israel was seen as a threat to Turkey since 1949, according to Channel 10.

    Meanwhile, in light of the policy paper, Israel’s tourism minister on Sunday called on Israelis to refrain from traveling to Turkey.

    Turkey must be “boycotted totally as a tourism destination” in order to preserve Israel’s national honor, Stas Mesezhnikov said.

    Relations between Israel and Turkey began deteriorating following the monthlong Gaza war in the winter of 2008-09. Relations further deteriorated following Israel’s interception of a Gaza-bound flotilla on May 31, which led to the deaths of nine Turkish nationals, including one Turkish-American dual citizen.

    Turkey has demanded that Israel apologize for its interception of the flotilla and pay compensation to the victims.

    via Turkey declares Israel ‘central threat’ | JTA – Jewish & Israel News.

  • Major showdown coming between Turkey and NATO over Iran

    Major showdown coming between Turkey and NATO over Iran

    Turkey is on a collision course with NATO over Turkey’s refusal – in connection with the placement of a land-based missile defense system on its territory by NATO – to have Iran designated an enemy (Hat Tip: Joshua I).

    Ahmet Davutoglu“We do not see any threat from any of our neighbouring countries, whether it is Iran, Russia, Syria or others,” Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu said during the weekend as he was visiting China.

    “I state quite clearly that Turkey will not be a frontal or flanking country [of the Nato missile shield] and we do not want to see again a zone of the Cold War and its psychology in our region,” he added, noting that any Nato shield should be developed along these principles.

    The line has irked the US, the main motor behind the shield, which is an upgraded version of a controversial plan by the previous George W. Bush administration.

    According to unnamed US officials quoted by the Daily Telegraph, the missile defence deal is being seen as an “acid test” of Turkey’s commitment to the transatlantic security alliance.

    “I would say that we are not putting pressure on the Turks [in regard to missile defence],” said US defence secretary Robert Gates at a Nato meeting in Brussels on 14 October. “But we are having continuing conversations with them as one of our allies.”

    Adding to Ankara’s reluctance in backing the Nato shield are America’s close links to Israel. According to the daily newspaper Today’s Zaman, Ankara has sought and reportedly received assurances from the US that intelligence gathered using the missile shield’s sensors will not be shared with Israel.

    Under Washington’s plans, the ballistic missile defence system would be rolled out in two phases. In the next two years, US Navy ships would be deployed in the Mediterranean. This would be followed by land-based interceptors in Romania and Poland and a high-tech radar in Bulgaria or Turkey by 2015.

    It’s time for Turkey to be thrown out of NATO. The West has to decide whether they are going to be allied with Israel or whether they are going to be allied with an Islamist ally of terror states like Iran and Syria. The choice should be obvious.

  • TURKEY: Ankara adds Israel to list of strategic security threats

    TURKEY: Ankara adds Israel to list of strategic security threats

    Turkey and Israel are at it again, but this time it’s over reports that Turkey has added Israel to its so-called “Red Book,” the top-secret security document that lists the country’s threats and enemies.

    Israeli tourism minister Stas Misezhnikov struck back on Sunday by calling on Israelis to boycott Turkey as a tourist destination out of “national honor.”

    According to Turkish media, the Red Book, which is amended every five years, now identifies Israel as a “strategic threat” to Turkey.

    The document, which is drawn up by Turkey’s National Security Council, accuses Israel of being a destabilizing force and says Israeli actions could provoke a regional arms race.

    Conflicting reports emerged over whether or not Iran, considered a major security threat by Turkey’s NATO allies, had been removed from the same list.

    Although the contents of the Red Book are ostensibly a state secret, leaks to the Turkish press indicate Ankara is losing patience with Israel and wants to send a message.

    Turkey continues to demand an apology and compensation from Israel for raiding a Turkish aid flotilla in international waters on May 31 and killing eight Turks and one Turkish-American activist. Israel maintains its soldiers acted in self-defense. A United Nations report released in September found enough evidence to prosecute the Israelis for war crimes including “willful killing” and “torture or unhumane treatment.”

    But despite evidence to the contrary, Turkish officials repeatedly deny a shift in foreign policy even as tensions with Israel rise and ties with Syria and Iran strengthen. Ankara is also frustrated by the pace of its quest to become a full European Union member.

    Earlier this month, Ankara voiced suspicions that a NATO missile shield aimed at Iran was prompted by Israeli security concerns.

    Still, Turkey is not ready to abandon its ties to Israel completely. Last week, Turkish and Israeli scholars gathered in Ankara amid the diplomatic crisis and concluded that relations were salvageable.

    Ozlem Tur, a scholar at the Middle East Technical University in Ankara, was quoted by the Turkish newspaper Today’s Zaman saying that Turkish-Israeli relations will not improve so long as there is no change in the Palestinian-Israeli peace process.

    “Without an apology and compensation, the relations will not go anywhere,” she said of the flotilla raid. “Israel has to comply with the results of the U.N. investigation.”

    — Meris Lutz in Beirut

    cenaze

    Photo: The death of nine Turkish citizens caused widespread outrage in Turkey and may have prompted the inclusion of Israel on a list of security threats. Credit: AFP

    via TURKEY: Ankara adds Israel to list of strategic security threats | Babylon & Beyond | Los Angeles Times.

  • Istanbul and Tel Aviv can fix what Ankara and Jerusalem broke

    Istanbul and Tel Aviv can fix what Ankara and Jerusalem broke

    The prospect of bringing together the secular elites of both countries – who share the dream, and the challenges, of integrating into the West, as well as the anxiety over religious ascendance – is an opportunity.

    By Aluf Benn

    ISTANBUL – Friends and family sounded worried: “Istanbul? Isn’t it dangerous there right now?” But travel warnings are cut off from reality. Despite the flotilla, the crisis in relations and the unrestrained condemnations of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, there have been no reports of Israelis encountering any problems in Turkey.

    The border inspectors at the Istanbul’s Ataturk Airport are a lot more courteous and efficient than their U.S. counterparts. No one in the streets, restaurants or hotel, and no one with whom I spoke with changed expression upon hearing that we were from Israel or when we spoke Hebrew in public.

    I was in Turkey because I was invited to a conference on the crisis in Israeli-Turkish relations sponsored by the Turkish trade association and Turkey’s Bogazici University. Our Kemalist hosts are not exactly the biggest supporters of Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party, but for all their apathy toward the political winds blowing from Ankara, they are also critical of Jerusalem.

    From our hosts’ perspective, bilateral ties began to be strained at the end of 2008, when Israel launched Operation Cast Lead in Gaza, several days after Ehud Olmert met with Erdogan in Ankara. The two leaders had been trying to find a way to make a breakthrough in Israel’s ties with Syria. Olmert did not even hint about an upcoming war, and Erdogan was deeply insulted when the operation began.

    “In Turkey there had been admiration for Israel, which built a paradise in the desert, and today there is concern for the Palestinians,” said Refik Ezran, an economics professor at the university. “For all my friendship with Israel and with Jews, I too am filled with anger over the degradation of the Palestinians, which reached its peak in Gaza. The destruction of institutions, schools and hospitals turns human beings into animals. [Israel] must improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza, or at least show that it has serious intentions.”

    Volkan Vural, a former Turkish ambassador to Israel who played an important role in shaping the Israeli-Turkish alliance in the previous decade, didn’t like the fact that a Turkish ship led the May 31 Gaza-bound flotilla raided by the Israel Navy, but has difficulty understanding why Israel refuses to apologize to the Turks for killing civilians aboard the Mavi Marmara. Vural rejects the the opinion that has taken root in Israel, which maintains that Turkey is becoming the new Iran.

    “The Erdogan government doesn’t deserve the criticism,” he said. “His party went from political Islam to conservative democracy. The element of cultural identity and Islam has recently been added to the mix, but not at a dangerous level. The majority here would oppose bringing Islam into foreign policy.”

    To improve Israeli-Turkish ties, we must look to the French model. France was Israel’s strategic partner, which reportedly provided it with a nuclear reactor in Dimona. And then Charles de Gaulle came to power, and he gradually moved away from Israel and toward the Arab world. Just like Erdogan.

    The Six-Day War was De Gaulle’s flotilla – an opportunity to shatter the alliance with Israel and declare an arms embargo. In Israeli eyes, that was an unforgivable betrayal; to the French, Israel looked like a belligerent and law-breaking country when it responded to the embargo by hijacking the Cherbourg boats.

    Formal ties have never flourished since – not even under Nicolas Sarkozy, the most pro-Israeli president of the Fifth Republic – but that has not had an impact on the thriving trade, the mass tourism, or the cultural and academic ties. Many Israelis love Paris, and they don’t care if the Israel Air Force flies in French Mirages or American F-16s.

    That’s the sort of thing that needs to happen with Turkey too. Istanbul and Tel Aviv can fix what Ankara and Jerusalem broke. Mutual trade has increased by 30 percent since the beginning of the year. Israeli tourism has gone down, but it can return to its previous levels. And the prospect of bringing together the secular elites of both countries – who share the dream, and the challenges, of integrating into the West, as well as the anxiety over religious ascendance – is an opportunity. Secular Turks are similar to secular Tel Avivians; There is a new restaurant in the Pera quarter of Istanbul, “Bird”, that attracts a stylish crowd and it’s tough to get a table, just as in Rothschild Boulevard’s Cantina.

    It won’t be simple. “Your idea is all well and good,” said one of the professors hosting us. “But it’s very hard for us to get a visa to go to Israel, or even to get close to the closely guarded consulate or the embassy.”

    It’s difficult to believe that will change any time soon. All the same, said Vural, “a way must be found to overcome the crisis and forge new ties.”

    “Maybe not as close as they were in the past, but proper ones,” he said. “It’s in the interest of both countries, of the region, and of the Westernization process of Turkey.”

    via Istanbul and Tel Aviv can fix what Ankara and Jerusalem broke – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

  • Turkey Analysis: What Does Ankara’s New “Red Book” of Threats Mean?

    Turkey Analysis: What Does Ankara’s New “Red Book” of Threats Mean?

    On Wednesday, Haaretz’s Aluf Benn shared his notes from a recent visit to Turkey for an academic conference. His conclusion? Turkey and Israel could still benefit from increasing rate of bilateral trade, great potential of tourism and secular/democratic needs over religious ascendence.

    On the same day, Turkey’s National Security Council (MGK) agreed to make radical changes to a document. referred to as the “Red Book” or the “Secret Constitution”, in which the main threats over the next five years to Turkey’s security are outlined.

    In the document, religious reaction is no longer mentioned as a domestic threat. Instead, it mentions “radical groups exploiting religion,” a term which, under the Turkish Penal Code (TCK), refers to groups that, by employing violent methods, use religion for destructive and separatist activities.

    The activities of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) were also discussed during the meeting. The council once again drew attention to the clandestine support given to the PKK by some countries, accusing these countries of insincerity in supporting Turkey’s counterterrorism efforts. In addition, emphasis was placed on the trilateral mechanism among Turkey, U.S. and Iraq.

    Ankara removed Iran, Iraq, Syria, Bulgaria, Georgia and Armenia, Russia, and Greece from their list of “threatening countries”. The problem of the 12-mile limit on territorial waters with Greece as a possible casus belli retains its importance, but the Red Book puts into place the recent declaration of Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu: ” We do not perceive any threat from any neighbor countries and we do not think our neighbors form a threat to NATO.”

    In contrast, for the first time since 1948, Ankara named “Israel’s instability-inducing actions in the Middle East” as a threat to its national security. “The region’s instability stems from Israeli actions and policy, which could lead to an arms race in the Middle East,” said the paper.

    Instead of a “regime threat” coming from Iran; the paper argued: “Within this scope, the attention was drawn for the importance of the immediate materialisation of the new tour of direct negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program between related parties.”

    Amongst non-state “new threats”, cyber terror, global warming, and ageing population were added to the agenda.

    Meanwhile, following Turkey’s conditions that a planned American missile defence system on its soil must not target either Syria or Iran and that the US must clearly state that the shield is not for the defense of a particular NATO member but a “deterrence” for the entirety of NATO’s territory Prime Minister Erdoğan, President Abdullah Gül. and Chief of General Staff Gen. Işık Koşaner had a brief meeting after the National Security session to discuss whether Turkey should be part of the defense shield.

    FM Davutoglu, visiting China, said on Saturday:

    We are an owner of NATO. We are not a partner… Missile shield, missile wars, where will Turkey be in this war? The discussions within NATO are not about this at all.

    First of all, Turkey is not a country that has to be convinced by NATO. Turkey is not alone; Turkey is at the center of NATO. Turkey is not in a position to be a frontier country. NATO, while doing threat planning on this issue, should cover all member states and should remain outside any formula that would geographically set one country against another.

    It is true that Turkey does not consider it appropriate to refer to neighboring countries in this [missile-defense] system… we want stability, prosperity and peace in our neighborhood.

    So, following the lines of Aluf Benn’s analysis, is the Erdogan government a new “De Gaulle” which is just pursuing its political calculations or is it the Trojan Horse aligning with “radicals” such as Iran, Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah?

  • Tourism minister urges Israelis to boycott Turkey

    Tourism minister urges Israelis to boycott Turkey

    Antalya, Turkey. Israelis have been ignoring the siren’s song.
    Antalya, Turkey. Israelis have been ignoring the siren’s song.

    JERUSALEM – Israel’s business rector is urging Israelis to kibosh motion to Turkey.

    Stas Mesezhnikov titled for the movement boycott after the Asiatic advise reportable Turkey has categorised Zion as a “strategic threat.”

    Mesezhnikov said Sun that ties with Turkey are essential to Israel. But said it staleness be “boycotted totally as a business destination” for the domestic honor.

    The Asiatic business ministry had no statistics on Asiatic business to Turkey.

    There was no commendation of the reports from Turkey.

    Asiatic movement agents impact reportable a super drop-off in once-popular movement to Turkey.

    Relations impact a newborn baritone in May after Asiatic naval commandos killed figure activists from Turkey on commission a flotilla that proven to severance Israel’s naval beleaguer of the Gaza Strip.