Category: Israel

  • Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan under fire for Zionism remarks

    Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan under fire for Zionism remarks

    Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan Photo: AP

    By Robert Tait, Jerusalem4:05PM GMT 01 Mar 2013

    recep_2496636b

    The comment, made at a United Nations conference to promote religious tolerance, earned a rebuke from Israel, the United Nations and the US, overshadowing a visit by John Kerry, the secretary of state, in Ankara for talks with Mr Erdogan on Syria.

    Speaking to the global forum of the Alliance of Civilisations in Vienna on Wednesday, Mr Erdogan said: “As is the case for Zionism, anti-Semitism and fascism, it is inevitable that Islamophobia be considered a crime against humanity.”

    Mr Kerry said he found the remarks “objectionable”.

    “We not only disagree with it, but we find it objectionable,” he said, during a joint press conference with Ahmet Davutoglu, his Turkish counterpart. “I raised the speech with the foreign minister and I will raise it with the prime minister.”

    A senior US official travelling with Mr Kerry’s party condemned the remark as “offensive” and said Turkish officials would be left in no doubt about Washington’s annoyance.

    “This was particularly offensive, frankly, to call Zionism a crime against humanity … It does have a corrosive effect (on relations),” the official said. “I am sure the secretary will be very clear about how dismayed we were to hear it.”

    “The Turkey-Israel relationship is frozen. We want to see a normalisation … not just for the sake of the two countries but for

    the sake of the region and, frankly, for the symbolism,”

    The Obama administration has sought to maintain close ties with Turkey — a majority Muslim country that is also a NATO ally — despite its deteriorating relationship with Israel partly because of its potential ability to be a broker in the civil war in Syria.

    Mr Erdogan’s remark had earlier been denounced by the White House and by Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, who called it “a dark and mendacious statement the likes of which we thought had passed from the world”.

    Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary general, who was present during Mr Erdogan’s speech and heard it on simultaneous translation, said it breached the spirit of the Alliance of Civilisations, which was formed in 2005 — with Turkey as a co-sponsor – to promote east-west understanding and combat extremism.

    “The Secretary-General believes it is unfortunate that such hurtful and divisive comments were uttered at a meeting being held under the theme of responsible leadership,” a statement from his office said.

    “If the comment about Zionism was interpreted correctly, then it was not only wrong but contradicts the very principles on which the Alliance of Civilizations is based.”

    Mr Ban had earlier come under attack from UN Watch, a Geneva-based group proclaiming affiliations to the US Jewish community, for failing to criticise Mr Erdogan’s speech immediately after it was made.

    Pro-Zionist groups frequently complain that the UN is biased against Israel — pointing to a 1975 resolution equating Zionism with racism.

    The resolution was revoked in 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    Relations between Israel and Turkey — once close allies — have been strained since 2010, when nine Turkish activists were killed after Israeli commandoes stormed a flotilla heading for the Gaza Strip. Mr Netanyahu has resisted Turkish pressure to apologise and pay compensation.

    Ties between the two nations were recently said to be undergoing a quiet revival, encouraged by the US, amid reports that Israel had resumed selling armament equipment to Turkey.

    Mr Erdogan, a former Islamist, has sharply criticised Israel in the past, although he has refrained from attacks on Zionism. In 2009 he stormed out of a debate with the Israeli president, Shimon Peres, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, after telling him “you Israelis know how to kill”.

    via Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan under fire for Zionism remarks – Telegraph.

  • Palestinian and Israeli people want  peace

    Palestinian and Israeli people want peace

    Палестина посол

     

     

     

     

    Gulnara Inandzh,

     

    Director of Information and Analytical Center Ethnoglobus (ethnoglobus.az),

    editor of  Russian section of  Turkishnews American-Turkish Resource website www.turkishnews.com  ,

    Head of  Representative Office of  Lev Gumilev Center of Russia in Azerbaijan.  

     

    After the parliamentary elections held in Israel there are hopeful statements by Tel Aviv’s officials on Palestine – Israel issue. Now there are hopes for restoration of peace negotiations which remains frozen for a long time. From now negotiations will be conducted under new conditions – with Palestine, a country awarded observer status at the United Nations.

    Palestinian Ambassador to Azerbaijan Naser Abdel Karim comments on the issue for turkishnews.com American-Turkish portal.

     

     

     -New Israeli PM and Foreign Minister agrees on recognition of independence of Palestine.But during previous period of Benjamin Netanyahu negotiations on Israel-Palestinian conflict was frozen. What is the reason that new Israeli government demonstrates interest in the settlement of the conflict?

     

    –         It is nice to hear news on recognition of Palestine as an independent state. But it would be better if it is connected with good will and be implemented seriously, without affecting already signed agreements and international treaties.

    Palestine Liberation Organization and State of Israel recognized each-other’s statehood in 1993. This statement doesn’t provide for objection to Palestine’sobserver status at the United Nations.

    However, Netanyahu government causes problem to recognition of State of Palestine.It is clear that for any just and comprehensive peace, independence of the State of Palestine should be recognized based on pre-1967 borders, including Eastern Quds, in accordance with resolutions under international legislation.

     

    -Israel government offers Mahmoud Abbas, Fatah movement leader, to mention in Arabic that Israel is the home to Jews against recognition of Palestine by Israel government. How do Palestine officials approach this statement?

     

    –         As I stressed above in my first answer, Netanyahu government continues laying down new conditions to already agreed problems. Palestine Liberation Organization already recognized Israel in 1993 and no Tel Aviv official has raised a question on the mentioned issue within these years.

    Netanyahu offered this condition, along with a number of others, to cause problem and delay negotiations. By the way, it is not the conclusion that we come but all the world leaders consider B.Netanyahu as non-serious.

    We want to return to the negations process which was frozen at the end of period of former PM Ehud Olmert. Negotiations should be conducted within some period and it should not be formal. At the same time, we want illegal settlement to be stopped in the invaded territories of Palestine. This is not the conditions offered by Palestine, but also the condition put before Israel which is provided by the Road Map agreement developed for solution of the conflict.

     

    -US President Barack Obama is expected to discuss the circumstances over the solution of the conflict during his visit to Israel. How do you think, what can the US offer?

     

    –         We hail Obama’s visit to the region. His visit shows that White House administration has important plans for both the countries regarding peace based on independence principles. But in order his visit to be effective for the region the US should use its position to have more pressure over Israel to cease settlement of Jews in the Eastern Quds and other Palestinian territories, while Tel Aviv should comply with the previously signed treaties. This should happen within the certain period. Negotiations depend on these treaties and international resolutions.

           

    -How is the notion of peacefully living with Jews accepted in Palestinian’s public thoughts?

     

    –         I guess that the people of Palestine, as well as, majority of Israelis want to achieve a peace and to put an end to the conflict. It is also proved by the survey carried out among the people of Palestine and Israel. State of Palestine wants to live in peace and friendship with its neighbor Israel based on pre-1967 borders, including Eastern Quds.

     

     

    -Former Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has said that Palestine cannot be recognized as an independent state. In Palestine, there are also radical powers which refuse to recognize Israel as a state and in that case how do you forecast the events?

     

    –         It is true that Mr. Lieberman represents the radical ideology being natural in Israel government. His party “Israel Is Our Home” is in coalition with B.Netanyahu’s “Likud” party. How can Foreign Minister use threat and digression methods, but Prime Minister refrains himself from reproaching him. A.Lieberman should make serious efforts to support for peace process by his statements.

    Despite radical minority in Palestine, president Mahmoud Abbas, Palestine Liberation Organization (Fatah) and State of Palestine have always insisted on compliance with peace principles. He has consistently tried to persuade radical powers in Palestine and achieved to get population’s opinion by stressing the necessity of achieving peace based on pre-1967 borders.

  • ISRAEL SUES CITIZENS FOR SLANDER AND APOLOGIES TO TURKEY

    ISRAEL SUES CITIZENS FOR SLANDER AND APOLOGIES TO TURKEY

    ISRAEL SUES CITIZENS FOR SLANDER AND APOLOGIES TO TURKEY

    “The Sixth Commandment says ‘Thou shalt not kill,’ so why you [the municipality] are killing us here?”
    Privacy and Libel Law: The Clash with Press Freedom

    Israel sues citizens for slander and apologies to Turkey

    every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment—Matthew 12:36

    BY ROITOV.COM

    Few newspaper editors have the capability to see the large picture; buried in their tactical manipulation of information they often miss the odd links created by their uncoordinated decisions, sometimes to the extent of hitting their own masters.
    On February 23, 2013, Israeli newspaper Haaretz did just that. Its Hebrew version grouped two strangely complementing pieces.
    One reported on an expected apology of Israel to Turkey due to the Freedom Flotilla crimes committed by Israel. A few days ago, Turkey and Israel became friends again after Israel agreed to supply spying equipment that had been frozen since 2011. In parallel, the two former allies are holding negotiations to end the rupture between them. Apparently, Israel would apologize for its crimes and would indemnify the hurt Turkish citizens while Turkey would drop its demand of Israel to end the siege on Gaza. If an agreement would be reached, it would be announced soon after a new government is formed in Israel.
    The last time Israel surrendered to such pressure was after it attacked Khaled Mashal. As often reported here, Israel understands only brute force as a negotiation tactic; after Turkey became a serious contestant to theEastern Mediterranean Gas Fields, Israel accepted a compromise. Israeli citizens seldom have a similar power; thus, Israel decided to sue those criticizing the State. This was the topic of the article placed next to the one on Turkey. This odd mix portrayed Israel’s real face, a bigot seeking to take advantage of the weak but subservient of those holding the real power.
    Suing State
    The Association for Civil Rights in Israel published these days a report on an unusual topic, it was titled Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation. It deals with a new trend, the State, its various organizations, corporations and large companies are systematically suing citizens criticizing them. The process is designed to maximize the harassment of the citizens, including trials for comments placed on innocuous internet forums.
    David Perl is a real-estate consultant; in 2011, he published several warnings in Tapuz (“orange fruit” in Hebrew), a popular Israeli portal, against the Eisenberg Group. The latter was selling agricultural terrains claiming that they will be “thawed” for urban construction shortly afterwards. The claim was a lie; buyers had no protection against it. The company sued Perl in two different courts (Nazareth and Hertzeliya) both far from his residence, so that he would be forced to move between these two cities.
    The company demanded him to pay a combined sum of roughly $500,000. In February 2013, following a complex saga, the President of the Supreme Court declared Perl innocent and sentenced the company to pay him roughly $500 for the harassment. The sum allotted won’t pay even for the costs caused by the judicial process. Following the sentence, Mr. Perl apologized for his use of words like “charlatans” in the forum but did not retract the facts.
    Mr. Perl’s case is just one of the many analyzed by the report. One of the lawyers who authored it said, “the main effect of these trials is not legal but social: it silences the complaints and hurts those making them.” This terror system is backed by the State. In the former Knesset, relevant legislation was fixed by the work of Meir Shitrit (then from party Kadima, now from HaTnua) and Yariv Levin (Likud). According to the new version, the suing party doesn’t need to show any proofs of damage if it is requesting less than NIS300,000 as damages.
    This is not a law, but State Terror. The trials are usually carried out against social organizations, activists, and regular citizens who complain on their violation by the State or its cherished corporations. A good example is the case of Avi Tamir, the man in the window at the top picture. He lives in Rehovot with his wife in a humble apartment; both are over 70 and retired. A few years ago the municipality decided to build a tower over his home. He placed the protests signs seen in the picture, which are not offensive in the Israeli context.
    He got a threatening letter from the municipality saying the signs are not allowed as per local regulations and that he would be sued for NIS50,000, well below the sum that requires providing proofs, but a fortune for the couple. The municipality is now waiting to begin the process after the next local elections; Mr. Tamir left the signs. This is State Terror.
    The lawyers analyzed also the typical letters sent by the companies. The Byzantyne, colorful text doesn’t translate well into English, but the trend was clear. Lawyers send accusation letters in which they define the crime, namely slander, but don’t provide details how it was committed. A citizen dared to answer them, asking the blaming lawyer in a florid style to please, please describe his offense so that he would be able to avoid committing it again. The corporate lawyer sent again the blaming letter, without providing any details. He can sue without proofs. This is State Terror.
    There is a Hebrew saying that translates as “to be smart on the weak;” it is used against those who attack the weak just because they can, while they refrain from even looking in the direction of those with power. It describes a state of cowardice, a state of violence, a society of ignorant lawlessness. It describes the State of Israel.

    ———
     Addendum: The People’s Right to tell Unpleasant Truths

    Slander, also known as defamation, calumny, vilification, traducement, and libel, is defined as a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, religion, or nation a negative or inferior image. Obviously, the claim must be false and communicated to someone other than the person defamed to create liability. The main international law dealing with people’s rights on the issue is the International Covenant on of Civil and Political Rights, which deals with the right to life, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, electoral rights and rights to due process and a fair trial.. In certain countries, slander is dealt with as a crime rather than a civil wrong. Yet, in 2012, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights ruled that the criminalization of libel violates Freedom of expression and is inconsistent with Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
  • It is time for Israel and Turkey to remember their deep common history

    It is time for Israel and Turkey to remember their deep common history

    It is time for Israel and Turkey to remember their deep common history

    BY SINEM TEZYAPAR

    584-Mavi_1

    I am a Turkish Muslim and every time I have a conversation with an Israeli friend, they keep asking me why the relations between Israel and Turkey have reached such a nadir, why Turkey seemingly has an antagonistic stance against Israel.

    First of all, Turkey’s being totally against Israel is out of question. Turkey and Israel are two countries who have deep-rooted, solid relations, and there will be no change in that. Although the language in the political arena may give a different impression, the bond between the Turkish and Israeli public remains unshaken. Yes, there has been a tension between Turkey and Israel for the last couple of years; however this is a temporary thing. And the Turkish public has never ceased to care for Israelis.

    The Mavi Marmara episode was an unwanted incident and I do not believe that no one ever presumed that things would end the way they did. I am confident that if both sides had known the result ahead of time, they would have striven to handle things in an entirely different manner. The Israeli public has to decide how they want to compensate, but we consider Israel as a friendly country in any event and we want to overcome this regrettable incident in the soonest time.

    Turkey and Israel share common features that deepens their alliance. Both states are officially secular while their people are predominantly religious. Since secularism is both a precaution and a blessing against hypocrisy, in both countries people who chose to be religious follow their free will and no one can compel anyone to any religion. That is to say, there is a firm stance against bigotry and in both countries people are respected and embraced regardless of their religion. And in both, just like believers can live by their faith, non-believers live as they choose as well.

    Israel and Turkey being secular prevents coercion, compulsion in the name of religion, and does not give ground for hypocrisy. Their interpretation of secularism should not be confused with atheism; rather, it guarantees the freedom of the public to practice their religion as they see fit. In both Israel and Turkey, democratic awareness and democratic values are more firmly rooted than any other country in the region. There is no room or tolerance for dictatorship or despotic regimes.

    Another commonality between the people of Turkey and Israel is that they do not have an overweening ambition to live a materialistic life in luxury. Both have known hardship and they have both been nurtured from their spirituality and conviction. They have been living under fire in a region that has never known stability and that has always been in the focus of the world with their conflicts.

    As the Turkish nation, we want nothing more then the continuance of Israel’s existence in peace and tranquility. We are happy to see its being prosperous and all its citizens living in comfort and safety. As Turkish people, the settling of the Jews in the region, their residing in those lands and their being free is something that we are not uncomfortable about. On the contrary; when various public figures in the Middle East make threatening and, quite frankly, genocidal pronouncements against the Israeli state and its citizens, it disturbs us greatly and we would never let something like that happen.

    Just like we came to the aid of our Jewish brothers and sisters and sailed them in private ships to Turkey in 1492 during the period of the Spanish Inquisition and welcomed them in our country, we will be ready to run to their help whenever they are in need. When Hitler targeted the Jews during the Nazis genocidal “Final Solution”, we struggled with all our might to protect them. We have lived in a friendly and brotherly manner together with our Jewish brothers. We have always provided good means for them, we have always wanted them to live in ease and comfort and that will always be the case as well. This is because such an attitude is the requisite of the morality that Islam requires. The Muslim Turks’ attitude for centuries has demonstrated that Turks and Jews have continued to help each other in times of great crises and it will continue to be this way, no matter what happens.

    When we go a back a little further in history, this is even more evident that Jews and Muslims not only coexisted but also supported each other. After the Romans destroyed the Second Temple and took control of the city, they expelled Jews from the city forbidding them to live there. When Rome adopted Christianity, they maintained a strict ban on Jews coming near Jerusalem after 325 A.D. Jews were only allowed to enter once a year to pray on Tisha B’Av. The ban on Jews entering the city remained in force until the Muslim Caliph Umar took control of the city. Muslims then welcomed the Jews to come back to Jerusalem for the first time in about 600 years. During the Abbasid Caliphate, Muslims continued to welcome Jews to settle in the city and this situation continued until the city was invaded by the Crusaders in 1099. Another point to be emphasized is that Muslims and Jews fought side-by-side to defend the city against the invading Crusaders. After the Crusaders conquered Jerusalem, and put a good many of the inhabitants to the sword -both Jewish and Muslim alike- Jews were once again prohibited to enter Jerusalem. This prohibition continued till the Muslim leader Salah al-Din Yusuf ibn Ayyub, known better as Saladin, finally liberated the city in 1187 from the Crusaders and invited the Jews to return to Jerusalem with no restrictions and allowed them to take up residence.

    The existence of Turkey is a safeguard for Israel. We will be the first ones to stand up for any kind of threat that might be aimed at Israel. There will never be a formation in Turkey that would aim to harm the Jewish people. Just as it could be in any society, there may be one or two rare extreme radical people and those individuals might come up with some unreasonable or irrational opinions. But radical thought can never find a broad foundation in Turkey.
What matters is that we are not a state in search of hostility. From time to time, we might have problems, as is inevitable between sovereign nation-states, but there will never be a complete termination of our friendship.

    We both want peace, friendship, democracy, human rights, goodness, compassion and love to be dominant in the region and we want to live a beautiful life together. Turkey and Israel working in unison can make the entire region faithful, prosperous and put an end to terror, radicalism and anarchy. Israel and Turkey will continue with their alliance as strong as steel and bring peace, love and tranquility to the region.

  • Israeli Initiative with Turkey Fails

    Israeli Initiative with Turkey Fails

    The head of Israel’s National Security Council met a Turkish official in an attempt to restore ties, but to no avail.

    img251592

    Mavi Marmara

    A recent Israeli attempt to restore the strained relations with Turkey failed, according to a report on Channel 2 News on Saturday night.

    According to the report, the head of Israel’s National Security Council, Yaakov Amidror, recently met in Rome with the Director-General of the Foreign Ministry in Ankara.

    The meeting was held at the initiative of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s Office and was also attended by Joseph Ciechanover, formerly the Director-General of the Israeli Foreign Ministry. However, the meeting failed and no agreements were reached.

    Israel’s relationship with Turkey broke down completely after the 2010 incident on the Mavi Marmara ship.

    The vessel, owned by the Turkish IHH group, was one of six sent to illegally breach Israel’s maritime blockade of Gaza as a “humanitarian flotilla” but was found to be carrying nothing.

    When the vessels ignored repeated Israeli navy requests to redirect their boats to Ashdod port, IDF commandos boarded each vessel to force them to port, where the humanitarian aid they were allegedly carrying could be off-loaded and carried to Gaza through the land crossings with Israel.

    In the case of the Mavi Marmara, however, the Israeli soldiers – armed only with pistols and paint-ball training guns — were brutally attacked by the “activists” as they boarded, with several critically injured. The commandos who followed them shot and killed their attackers, leaving nine dead.

    Turkish leaders have demanded an apology from Israel over the incident, but Israeli leaders have refused, saying Israel had acted in self-defense.

    Former Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman emphasized in the past that Israel is ready to solve any outstanding disputes with Turkey, but it will not apologize to Ankara for the raid on the Mavi Marmara.

    Turkey has several times rejected offers by Israel to improve relations. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erodgan has chosen to deepen the conflict by continuously verbally attacking Israel.

    Earlier this month, Erdogan accused Israel of waging “state terrorism”, condemning an alleged Israeli air strike in Syria as an unacceptable violation of international law.

    Tags: Mavi Marmara ,Yaakov Amidror ,Israel-Turkey relations

    via Israeli Initiative with Turkey Fails – Middle East – News – Israel National News.

  • ‘Turkey Marmara trial a cynical political process

    ‘Turkey Marmara trial a cynical political process

    ‘ By YONAH JEREMY BOB02/20/2013 03:09

    Trial of 4 former IDF commanders charged with the deaths of nine Turks aboard the Mavi Marmara set to restart.

    Turkish cruise ship Mavi Marmara, carrying pro-Palestinian activists and humanitarian aid to Gaza, leaves from Sarayburnu port in Istanbul

    Mavi Marmara Photo: Stringer Turkey / Reuters

    Two days away from the restart of Turkey’s trial on Thursday in absentia of top Israeli military commanders regarding the May 2010 Marvi Marmara flotilla incident, The Jerusalem Post recently spoke to a top government legal official who said that the entire process is “political, not really judicial. It looks judicial, but it’s really not.”

    The first set of hearings for the trial of four former Israeli military commanders, charged with the deaths of nine Turks aboard the Mavi Marmara, started in November 2012, but recessed after a few days.

    Related:

    ‘Common sense must reign in Mavi Marmara case’

    ‘Families of Marmara flotilla victims sue Israel’

    The commanders charged are former chief of staff Lt.-Gen. (res.) Gabi Ashkenazi, former OC Navy V.-Adm. (res.) Eliezer Marom, former OC Military Intelligence Maj.-Gen. (res.) Amos Yadlin and former Air Force Intelligence chief Brig.-Gen. (res.) Avishai Levy.

    The 144-page indictment in the case seeks more than 18,000 years of life sentences in a trial expecting around 490 witnesses.

    Speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue, the official asked, “What does Turkey want with this? Maybe they’re waiting to [see] what the next government looks like.”

    The government to date has boycotted the proceedings, referring to the trial as a “kangaroo court.” But Israel has faced biased audiences before and has found ways to indirectly present its point of view, such as when former Israeli government officials presented what would have been many of Israel’s arguments to the UN’s Goldstone Commission that investigated the 2008-2009 Gaza War, even though the government itself boycotted the hearings.

    Asked if any similar behind the scenes efforts were under way, the official demurred, saying “this is nothing like Goldstone. The case is not against a state, it’s against four individuals,” implying that it was not even clear what kind of standing Israel as a country would have had to appear before the Turkish court.

    The official said that the decision not to attempt even behind the scenes presenting of Israel’s position was made in light of an estimation that “I don’t think the Turkish judge will go against the Turkish government’s” agenda of harming Israel’s image – “there is no chance,” he said.

    He also said, “I don’t think any legal arguments could impact the process, because it is not a judicial process at all. The trial is being used for cynical political processes.”

    What objective factors brought the official to these conclusions? The official said the court was completely ignoring the neutral and authoritative UN-sponsored Palmer Report on the incident, which held that Israel’s blockade was legal under international law and that to the extent that there were Israeli violations of the law of armed conflict in the altercations on the vessel, their severity was mitigated by the context of the Israel Navy sailors being under attack.

    The “judge can look at the Palmer Report which is not like the actions discussed in the trial,” the official said.

    He said unlike the Turkish trial, the Palmer Report makes no mention of “murder” allegations, at most describing certain actions as “mistakes” and problematic “planning issues in the context of self-defense.”

    The official said that Israel was not afraid of defending itself in cases in countries where it believed it had a shot at a fair trial and that to date “no universal jurisdiction case has gotten past the first round of procedures” to go to trial.

    Ties between Jerusalem and what was once its only Muslim ally crumbled after the incident, in which some of the sailors who tried to commandeer the ship were wounded in clashes with those on board that left nine of the passengers dead.

    Turkish media reports and various Twitter accounts of the case in November indicated that the witnesses included statements from the families of the nine dead passengers and people from other ships in the protest flotilla as well as surviving activists from the Mavi Marmara.

    Ahmed Dogan – the father of 19- year-old Furkan Dogan, the youngest of the dead passengers – said he saw evidence showing that his son had been “shot in the face,” according to the reports.

    Mary Ann Wright, a 65-year-old former US Army colonel who was aboard the nearby Challenger 1 ship, testified about the scale of the military force involved in stopping the flotilla as well as the sailors’ conduct vis-a-vis the firing of paintballs and tossing of stun grenades.

    According to the reports, Wright said she believed that such a force could only have been meant to attack.

    The reports could not be confirmed and no Israeli officials are present at the trial to make objections or cross-examine the witnesses.

    via ‘Turkey Marmara trial a cynical p… JPost – Diplomacy & Politics.