Category: Israel

  • New book questions Israel’s survival

    New book questions Israel’s survival

    Jerusalem-based journalist Aaron Klein releases new book titled, ‘The Late, Great State of Israel’, in which he asserts that Israel’s policy is leading the country to its demise

    Josh Lichtenstein
    Published: 04.27.09, 22:25 / Israel Culture

    Israel’s current policy is leading toward the country’s demise, journalist and head of the WorldNetDaily Jerusalem bureau claims in his newly-released book, “The Late, Great State of Israel” and subtitled, “How enemies within and without threaten the Jewish nation’s survival” (WND Books).

    Klein became motivated to begin this project following Israel’s 2005 disengagement of Gaza under Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s helm. He could not accept the International media’s portrayal of Jewish settlers in Gaza being fundamentalists living on stolen Arab land.

    Klein is the author of the 2007 book, “Schmoozing with Terrorists”, and a regular guest on cable news networks Fox News and Al Jazeera English.
    klein1 waKlein with Hamas’ number two in the West Bank, Muhammad Abu Tir (Photo: WND Books)

    This book is the culmination of four years of reporting in former Jewish communities within the Gaza Strip and on the Israel-Lebanon-Syria border.

    To write this book Klein conducted 100 hundred interviews with top leaders in Lebanon, Syria, the Palestinian Authority and Hamas. Klein also sought the opinions of Israeli and US officials.

    Klein analyzes the result of Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and determines that land-for-peace policies only increase attacks on Israeli citizens. The book takes place within the context of the 2005 withdrawal from Gaza, the war in Lebanon, and the most recent 22 day operation against Hamas in Gaza. In his book Klein places much of the blame on the government of Israel.

    ‘Israel legitimizing Hamas’

    In an interview to Ynetnews, Klein said: “It was Israel that led the charge in legitimizing Yasser Arafat, bringing him out from exile in Tunis and providing him and his Fatah gang with a fiefdom in the West Bank and Gaza Strip from which to wage jihad against the Jews.

    “Now, Israel’s policy is enhancing the same Fatah movement while also working to legitimize Hamas, by, among other things, negotiating with the Islamist group and failing to defeat Hamas militarily”.

    Klein is also very critical of the United States funding and legitimizing Hamas in the International community. “Israel remains committed to negotiating a Palestinian state- in talks strongly urged on by the Obama administration- with a ‘peace partner’ whose official institutions indoctrinate its citizens with intense anti-Jewish hatred and violence” Klein told Ynetnews.

    The book presents a very grim evaluation of the last four years of Israeli policy. “Unless these and other outlined perils are countered soon, the only remnant of the Jewish country may soon be an epitaph: ‘The Late, Great State of Israel’”.

    Source:  www.ynetnews.com, 27.04.09

  • Israel “troubled” by Turkish-Syrian military drill

    Israel “troubled” by Turkish-Syrian military drill

    Apr 27, 2009

    JERUSALEM, April 27 (Reuters) – Israel is troubled by an unprecedented military exercise between its ally, Turkey, and its arch-foe Syria, Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak said on Monday.

    Ankara announced on Sunday it would hold its first drill with Syria this week, using ground forces in a border area that has been the focus of a 25-year conflict between Turkey and separatist Kurdish rebels.

    Israel has extensive defence ties to Turkey, a NATO member and among the few Muslim nations to have built an alliance with the Jewish state. The Israeli and Turkish air forces and navies have held joint exercises.

    “Today we see a Syrian-Turkish drill, which is certainly a troubling development,” Barak told reporters. “But I believe that the strategic ties between Israel and Turkey will overcome even Turkey’s need to take part in this drill.” (Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Charles Dick)

    Source:  www.reuters.com, Apr 27, 2009

  • A family history on the Jews of Kurdistan (sic)

    A family history on the Jews of Kurdistan (sic)

    By SHELDON KIRSHNER, Staff Reporter

    Wednesday, 08 April 2009

    Walter Fischel, an American academic, visited the Jews of  Kurdistan in the 1940s. “Such Jews,” he exclaimed with a sense of wonder. “Men virile and wild-looking. Women wearing embroidered turbans, earrings, bracelets, even ring-noses, and with symbols tattooed into their faces…”

    Roughly 25,000 Jews lived in Kurdistan back then, 18,000 in Iraq and the rest in Iran, Syria and Turkey.

    Largely illiterate but famous as gifted storytellers and speaking the ancient language of Aramaic, Kurdish Jews were found in some 200 Muslim villages and towns throughout the Middle East on the eve of Israel’s establishment.

    Ariel Sabar, an American journalist, has more than a passing knowledge of this exotic Jewish community, most of whose members immigrated to Israel in the early 1950s.

    Sabar, in My Father’s Paradise: A Son’s Search for His Jewish Past in Kurdish Iraq (Algonquin Books), produces a family history and a portrait of Kurdish Jews in this richly documented volume.

    As the title suggests, the book turns on his father, Yona, a linguist, researcher and professor of Hebrew at the University of California in Los Angeles.

    Born in the northern Iraqi town of Zakho, in the heart of Iraq’s Kurdish region, but raised in Israel, Yona Sabar  has published more than 90 monographs and two books on Aramaic – a nearly extinct language today – and the folklore of Kurdish Jews.

    Despite his father’s international reputation as a scholar, Sabar did not appreciate his accomplishments and was even ashamed of him.

    “I swore horribly in front of him, ridiculed him behind his back and took pains to avoid him, to be nothing like him,” he readily admits.

    Sabar, who was born in Los Angeles,  wanted to be part of what he describes as “the California mainstream,” and since his father rejected that ethos, father and son, like oil and water, did not mix.

    “When we collided, it wasn’t pretty,” he writes in this frank and pungent memoir. “I threw tantrums and unleashed hailstorms of four-letter words. He stewed privately over how any son could behave that way toward his father, then consoled himself with the hypothesis that this was how children were in America.”

    The cultural clash he alludes to forms  but a segment of the core of My Father’s Paradise. In the final pages, Sabar comes to terms with him as he reclaims his heritage and visits Zakho.

    The Jews of Zakho lived among 26,000 Kurdish Muslims and were concentrated in the mahala Juheeya, the oldest district, on an island on the Habur River. “Their mud-brick houses lined narrow alleys that zigzagged down to the river,” Sabar writes.

    Since they were so isolated, they spoke Aramaic, the lingua franca of the Middle East until Arab armies from Arabia conquered Mesopotamia in the 17th century.

    By all accounts, Jews and Kurds lived in harmony until Israel’s creation in 1948. To the Jews of Zakho, Sabar observes, Zionism represented, among other things, hopes for a better life and unease over the breakdown of Jewish-Muslim relations.

    The first Jews to make aliyah were the have-nots – the small peddlers, the porters, the beggars. “Most carried only the rags on their backs and perhaps a single clay bowl,” says Sabar.

    Once Sabar’s family was ready to leave in 1951, the Iraqi government passed a law that cancelled the citizenship and froze all the assets and property of departing Jews.

    Sabar’s father was 13 years old when he and his parents and siblings left the country of their ancestors.

    “The end arrived suddenly,” Sabar writes. “A line of motor coaches rolled into town early one April morning, and word went out that the time had come. Under a sky still full of stars, Jewish families, anxious and bleary, dragged suitcases and children out front doors and into cramped alleys that led to the main street.”

    Hundreds of Kurds bid farewell to their Jewish neighbours, but the atmosphere was very different in Baghdad. “At the airport, angry mobs pressed against the barricades, hurling curses.”

    Life was hard for Sabar’s family in Jerusalem, particularly for his grandmother: “Her relatives bought her a washing machine and stove, but the controls confounded her… She trudged off to night classes to learn Hebrew, but quit in frustration after two years, scarcely able to distinguish the letters of the alphabet. She had never learned to read or write her mother tongue. Why did people think she could master a second language?”

    Sabar’s father, Yona, was more adaptable. A good student, he graduated from the Hebrew University with a BA in Hebrew and Arabic. Nevertheless, he felt that Kurdish Jews were patronized by the Ashkenazi elite, and he wondered whether he could pursue a scholarly career in Israel.

    He was thus only too pleased to accept a scholarship  from Yale University, where he plumbed the depths of Aramaic and met his wife.

    In 1972, a year before Sabar was born, he was offered a position at the University of California. And there he thrived.

    “The Promised Land had been a disappointment,” Sabar writes in a reference to Israel. “It had broken his father and his grandfather. It had humiliated and infantilized his mother. A generation of Kurdish Jews had been spit on by a society that should have known better.”

    Yona Sabar’s success as an up-and-coming scholar did not spoil him, but his plain, unpretentious mien, his cheap clothes and his malapropisms in English alienated his insecure son.

    “I didn’t know it as a boy, but he was almost single-handedly turning the field of Neo-Aramaic from a marginal curiosity to one commanding serious and growing attention at major academic conferences,” Sabar adds.

    After Sabar himself became a father, he learned to value his father and his achievements and quit his job so that he could explore the lost world of Iraqi Kurdish Jews on a spiritual journey.

    Having convinced his father to accompany him, the pair set off. They arrived in Zakho after Iraq’s dictator, Saddam Hussein, was unseated by the United States and its allies.

    To Sabar, the purpose of the trip was crystal clear: “We could repair our relationship over cups of cardamom tea at cafés by the Habur River. We could walk together through the streets of the old Jewish neighbourhood, summoning the spirits of our ancestors… He would at last see me for the better son I had become.”

    And so, as Sabar relates in this  intriguing book, father and son  finally bonded.

    Source:  www.cjnews.com, 08 April 2009

  • Enduring voices [Editor’s Column]

    Enduring voices [Editor’s Column]

    Andrew Silow-Carroll
    NJJN Editor-in-Chief
    April 9, 2009

    andrew-silow-carrollI was exchanging e-mails recently with a reader about a column I wrote defending endogamy — that is, marriage between two Jews. “A bigot is one strongly loyal to one’s own social group, yet irrationally and prejudicially intolerant or disdainful of others,” he wrote. “If this paper’s chief editor is not a bigot — as he hopes — after reading this [column], I’m left wondering what he thinks he is.”

    I don’t think I am intolerant of anything, unless you count lactose.

    But his question continues to nag at me: Why does any culture value its own transmission, and can I justify the Jewish obsession with continuity in an era of multiple identities and, the flip side, violent tribalism?

    In my defense, I quoted the work of K. David Harrison, a linguist who studies dying languages. According to his Enduring Voices Project, “Nearly 80 percent of the world’s population speaks only one percent of its languages. When the last speaker of a language dies, the world loses the knowledge that was contained in that language.”

    By extension, Judaism is a culture with a rich language — not just Hebrew or Yiddish but a language of ritual, of social norms, of worship, of behaviors that order its practitioners’ world — in short, a rich system of knowledge. To dedicate oneself to preserving that shows no disdain for other cultures. Consider: When colonial powers try to wipe away traces of an indigenous culture, we call it ethnic cleansing. When Jews seek other Jews in order to live as rich a Jewish life as possible, some call it bigotry.

    Soon after this exchange I came upon Ariel Sabar’s beautiful new book, My Father’s Paradise: A Son’s Search for His Jewish Past in Kurdish Iraq. Sabar’s father, Yona, is the world’s preeminent expert on Neo-Aramaic, the language he grew up speaking in the Jewish quarter of Zakho, a Kurdish market town in northern Iraq. The book traces Yona’s journey from Kurdistan to Israel to southern California, where he is a professor at UCLA.

    The book is an American-born, journalist son’s attempt to reconnect with a father he once dismissed as an awkward, hopelessly uncool immigrant. But it is also a rumination on language and Jewish culture, and the ways, and worth, of trying to preserve both.

    For perhaps 1,700 years and until the seventh-century rise of Arabic, Aramaic was to the Levant what English is to the modern world: its lingua franca. The language lives on in the Talmud, the Zohar, the traditional wedding ketuba, and other texts. You hear it in the Mourner’s Kaddish and the Kol Nidrei prayer chanted on Yom Kippur eve.

    But “lives” is a relative term — Aramaic began disappearing as a living Jewish language with the immigration of Iraq’s small Kurdish-Jewish community to Israel in the 1950s. Like Yona Sabar, Kurdish Jews made a lightning leap from the 18th century to the 20th, and the language barely made the crossing.

    Ariel Sabar recreates the lost Jewish world of Zakho, where his hard-working grandparents thrived as dyers and textile merchants. Israel is a shock, and Yona’s parents and grandfather are adrift in the ramshackle tent cities and slums built to accommodate the flood of new immigrants. As Kurds, they occupy perhaps the lowest rung on Israel’s strict ladder of ethnic hierarchy. (One of the book’s heroes is Itzhak Ben-Zvi, Israel’s second president, an Ashkenazi Jew who championed the study and preservation of “Oriental” Jewish cultures.)

    Out of this world Yona emerges as an unlikely scholar at Hebrew University with a rare distinction: fluency in a language that other scholars know only from the synagogue and dusty manuscripts. He soon lands at Yale and eventually becomes a lionized academic and teacher in Los Angeles. Writes Ariel: “Teaching Aramaic in America, I came to see, was how he sang God’s song in a strange land.”

    Ariel, meanwhile, grows up a typical California kid, embarrassed by his father’s eccentricities and distant from his plucked Jewish roots. Ariel marries a non-Jewish woman and, while he pledges to raise their son as a Jew, disappoints the family by refusing to have the boy circumcised.

    And here a reader is tempted to cluck his tongue and lament the withering of another branch on the Jewish family tree. But there is something cannier and more surprising going on in My Father’s Paradise. Ariel thinks long and hard about what we owe the past, and the future. He can’t live his father’s life, any more than his father can live in the dusty alleyways of Zakho. But he can tell the story of the Kurdish Jews, of Aramaic, and of his father’s heroic efforts to remember both.

    Ariel Sabar made his choices; you and I might make others. His book suggests the various ways we can embrace diversity while adding new chapters to the cultures we inherit.

    “Jews had carried a flame into the hills of Kurdistan, and they carried it out, still burning, 2,700 years later,” he writes. “My father touched another candle to it and brought it across continents. I didn’t want it to die with me. If my children ever feel adrift, unsure of who they are, I want that candle to still be burning.”

    Comment: comments@njjewishnews.com

    Source:  www.njjewishnews.com, April 9, 2009

  • Serious dialogue, and painful disagreements

    Serious dialogue, and painful disagreements

    Questions for… Imam Abdullah Antepli

    by Johanna Ginsberg
    NJJN Staff Writer

    April 23, 2009

    Imam Abdullah Antepli, first Muslim chaplain at Duke University and a strong advocate for Muslim-Jewish dialogue, will speak about Muslim responses to Gaza at Congregation Beth Hatikvah in Summit on Friday, April 24, at 8 p.m.  Photo courtesy Abdullah Antepli
    Imam Abdullah Antepli, first Muslim chaplain at Duke University and a strong advocate for Muslim-Jewish dialogue, will speak about Muslim responses to Gaza at Congregation Beth Hatikvah in Summit on Friday, April 24, at 8 p.m. Photo courtesy Abdullah Antepli

    Imam Abdullah Antepli is the first Muslim chaplain serving at Duke University in North Carolina, where he also teaches an introduction to Islam course in the divinity school. Antepli completed undergraduate work in his native Turkey and earned a master’s degree from Hartford Seminary in Connecticut, where he is a doctoral candidate. He is the founder of the Muslim Chaplains Association and a member of the Association of College and University Chaplains.

    He and Rabbi Amy Small of Congregation Beth Hatikvah, a Reconstructionist synagogue in Summit, co-teach a class at Hartford Seminary on the Abrahamic religions. On Friday, April 24, he will speak at Small’s synagogue at 8 p.m. on Responses to the War in Gaza.

    Ahead of the talk, he heaped praise on Small for inviting him to speak. “We are all in our cocoons, and the source of our information is biased. Not many people go out of their way to pay attention to what the other side is seeing,” he said in a recent phone conversation.

    NJJN: You seem to be the exception in your desire for Muslim-Jewish dialogue. Why is there so little, and what has made you the exception?

    Antepli: There is little going on in terms of Muslim-Jewish dialogue because of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. That conflict and its consequences go beyond that space, beyond 100 years. Without putting blame on anyone, because of that conflict, Jews and Muslims are divided. Fourteen hundred years of often good relationships went through the drains, forgotten by many Jews and many Muslims. It’s very tense. People are so wounded on all sides, and the wounds are very fresh.

    I grew up a victim of the divide. I grew up being taught about Jews and Judaism, all sorts of negative stuff. In southeast Turkey, that’s the information I received. It was as if Jews and Muslims first met over this conflict. Our hearts and minds were poisoned.

    God Almighty was merciful and did not allow me to live with this poison. He conducted me on a different journey. I met Jews when I lived in southeast Asia for eight years before coming to the United States. The first Jews I met were business people from Europe and the U.S. They were not religious, but we were able to establish friendships — human to human relationships.

    When I moved to the United States six years ago, I came to the Hartford Seminary, where the whole focus is on Abrahamic dialogue and interfaith dialogue…. I started taking classes and studied Torah, and I found that…ethically, morally, and spiritually Judaism and Islam are so similar; there’s an inevitable chemistry and attraction [between the people]. As someone who takes religion seriously, I was able to connect with Judaism, theologically and in the understanding of the worldview, in a very short while. That strengthened my sense of responsibility.

    NJJN: How do you discuss Israel and Gaza and related issues with Jewish groups? What are the challenges? How do you overcome them?

    Antepli: Gaza is a very difficult issue. Gaza is not good news whatsoever. It just provides another level of pain. Thank God, Baruch Hashem, my relationship [with the Jewish community at Duke] was very strong and already ongoing when the war began.

    But there are clear differences in the way we see Gaza. Having a strong relationship enables us to have painful conversations despite our significant disagreements.… This is the basic entry point for any serious dialogue. The Muslim community openly expresses its criticism and its anger and frustration toward the State of Israel’s policy on Gaza, but deliberately not toward Israel or Israelis in general. We have been able to criticize the way the situation was handled and the tragic situation in which innocent civilians were injured.

    [The war in Gaza] was counterproductive. It was done in the name of security, but it was a disservice to Israeli security. I do not think Israel is safer now.

    NJJN: What are the challenges you face as the first Muslim chaplain at Duke?

    Antepli: I face two sets of challenges: one internally, within the Muslim community, and one externally with the larger non-Muslim community on campus and beyond.… The 550 Muslim students, faculty, and staff at Duke are representative of the entire 1.3 billion Muslims in terms of their ethnic, political, psychological, and spiritual diversity. I am the chaplain for all of them. How do you create a Muslim community out of this diverse group?

    Externally, the main challenge is not unique to me; it’s the challenge facing all Muslims living in post-9/11 United States. A large part of the community bought the idea that Islam is violent and Muslims are terrorists. My arrival and strong presence was not good news for people with these stereotypical ideas about Muslims…. This was an issue for people of a very particular Christian background, and there was also criticism from some in the Jewish community, especially after the Gaza War. But the overwhelming majority of people have offered support and love and care.

    For more information about Imam Antepli’s visit to Congregation Beth Hatikvah, contact the synagogue at 908-277-0200.

    Comment: comments@njjewishnews.com

  • Turkish-Israeli Relations

    Turkish-Israeli Relations

    A briefing by Soner Cagaptay
    April 3, 2009



    Multimedia for this item

    Audio Recording

    Soner Cagaptay is director of the Turkish Research Program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and an expert on Turkish-Israeli relations. He earned his Ph.D. from Yale, taught at Princeton, and contributes regularly to leading news outlets. On April 9, Mr. Cagaptay addressed the Middle East Forum via conference call.

    To illustrate how Turkey has changed under AK Party rule (the “Justice and Development” party), Soner Cagaptay highlighted the fact that, before the AKP came to power in 2002 elections, Turkey “worked as a normal country,” exhibiting qualities more in line with non-Muslim, secular nations.

    For example, pre-AKP Turkey fostered a positive public relationship with Israel, exemplified by strong economic, intellectual, and even military ties. Moreover, Turkey was an important contributor to NATO, having participated in every NATO operation since joining the alliance in 1952. Finally, it exhibited a markedly pro-Western outlook and was being seriously considered for EU membership.

    38Soner Cagaptay

    All three qualities have eroded under AKP leadership. EU accession talks have stalled as liberal democratic values are being undermined in Turkey. Media freedom and gender equality have suffered; there are now fewer women in public life. Turkey refused to allow U.S. troops to enter Iraq from the north in 2003 and is now cultivating links with Iran.

    Nowhere has this transformation been more pronounced than in Turkey’s relationship with Israel. Prime Minster Erdoğan and his party have promoted anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel at home, suggesting that “God would punish Israel” and accusing it of having turned Gaza into a “concentration camp.” Turkey’s antagonism came to a head at the Davos meeting earlier this year when Erdoğan told Israeli President Peres, “You know very well how to kill people.”

    Yet not all killing upsets Turkey. The day after returning from Davos, Erdoğan hosted the vice president of Sudan, who is currently wanted by the International Criminal court for waging a genocide against the non-Arab Muslim population. Cagaptay believes this is the “best proof that Erdoğan’s thinking and foreign policy is Islamist. Turkey’s opposition to Danish Prime Minister Rasmussen’s nomination to head NATO due to his defending the publication of the Muhammad cartoons is also telling.

    Cagaptay fears that continued AKP influence will turn Turkish citizens against Israel and the West. This is a problem because Turkey is a democracy and “you cannot sustain a relationship that is not supported by the public.” Furthermore, as the AKP views world conflicts in terms of Muslims versus non-Muslims, its place within NATO could deteriorate further as the alliance launches new offensives in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    However, Cagaptay sees reasons for optimism. The AKP fared poorly in recent local elections and the economic downturn is bound to have a negative impact on its prospects. As professionals abandon the AKP, it will be left with an Islamist core, allowing outsiders more easily to identify it for what it is. Thus Erdoğan’s Davos outburst was a “blessing in disguise.”

    Cagaptay counsels the Obama administration to define Turkey as a Western country that happens to be Muslim, thereby setting clear benchmarks for Turkish behavior both internally and on the world stage. Furthermore, America must not alienate ordinary Turks by passing resolutions condemning the Armenian genocide, a wildly unpopular topic in Turkey.

    According to Cagaptay, the most important lesson from the Turkish experience over the past decade is: “Do not allow Islamist rule because they corrupt even the most liberal of Muslim societies.”

    This is a lesson that many Palestinians may have come to learn the hard way.

    Summary account by David Rusin and Raymond Ibrahim.

    https://www.meforum.org/2117/turkish-israeli-relations