Category: Iran

  • US: Iran, P5+1 should talk in Europe

    US: Iran, P5+1 should talk in Europe

    US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley
    US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley

    The United States says talks between Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany should take place in central Europe.

    US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley said that any upcoming talks between the two sides should be held first in central Europe but any follow-up talks could take place in Turkey.

    “Istanbul could still be a location for a second follow-on meeting,” he told reporters on Friday.

    “But the general consensus is that the first meeting should be somewhere in central Europe,” he went on to say.

    “We think it’s a more appropriate and a more convenient location for a first meeting,” he added without providing more explanation.

    His remarks come after EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who represents the P5+1, accepted Iran’s proposed date for comprehensive talks with the P5+1.

    Ashton’s office said on Friday that she “has agreed to their proposal to begin talks on December 5.”

    The Islamic Republic has proposed Turkey as the venue of talks, but Ashton’s office said that she suggested talks be held in Austria or Switzerland.

    The P5+1 group consists of Britain, China, France, Russia, the United States and Germany.

    Iran says it is “serious” in talks, calling on the P5+1 to adopt a constructive approach toward the upcoming talks with Tehran.

    AR/MGH/HRF

  • George W Bush memoirs: foreign powers and Tony Blair

    George W Bush memoirs: foreign powers and Tony Blair

    Cowboy Bush and Wse BlairGeorge W Bush, the former US president, has launched his memoirs and given a series of interviews, which provide fascinating insights into his views on foreign powers, among them Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and Tony Blair, the former Prime Minister.

    By Andy Bloxham

    On Tony Blair:

    He compared Mr Blair to Winston Churchill and disclosed that, on the eve of the war in Iraq, the British PM was willing to risk bringing down the Government to push through a vital vote. He cites Mr Blair’s “wisdom and his strategic thinking as the prime minister of a strong and important ally”, adding: “I admire that kind of courage. People get caught up in all the conventional wisdom, but some day history will reward that kind of political courage.”

    On British and European public opinion:

    The former president was frank about the lack of weight he attached to how he was thought of in the UK both while he was in power and since he left it, saying: “It doesn’t matter how people perceive me in England. It just doesn’t matter any more. And frankly, at times, it didn’t matter then.” He said: “People in Europe said: “Ah, man, he’s a religious fanatic, cowboy, simpleton.” All that stuff… If you believe that freedom is universal, then you shouldn’t be surprised when people take courageous measures to live in a free society.”

    On Saddam:

    “There were things we got wrong in Iraq but that cause is eternally right,” he said. “People forget he was an enemy, he had invaded countries, everybody thought he had weapons of mass destruction, it became clear that he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction. What would life be like if Saddam Hussein were [still] in power? It is likely you would be seeing a nuclear arms race.” He also adds that Saddam disclosed his reasons for pretending to have WMDs when he could have avoided war were because “he was more worried about looking weak to Iran than being removed by the coalition.”

    On Afghanistan:

    “Our government was not prepared for nation building. Over time, we adapted our stratedy and our capabilities. Still, the poverty in Afghanistan is so deep, and the infrastructure so lacking, that it will take many years to complete the work.”

    On Iran:

    “A government not of the people is never capable of being held to account for human rights violations. Iran will be better served if there is an Iranian-style democracy. They play like they’ve got elections but they’ve got a handful of clerics who decide who runs it.”

    On China:

    He believes its internal politics will stop it being a superpower economy to rival the US for many years. “China, no question, is an emerging economy. China has plenty of internal problems which means that, in my judgment, they are not hegemonistic. They will be seeking raw materials.

    On Syria:

    Mr Bush recounts an incident when Israel’s then-prime minister Ehud Olmert called him to ask him to bomb what Mossad agents had discovered was a secret nuclear facility in Syria. He said no but Israel destroyed it without warning him. Telling the story appears to signal his displeasure at not being told.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8119227/George-W-Bush-memoirs-foreign-powers-and-Tony-Blair.html, 09 Nov 2010

  • EU official rejects Turkey as venue for Iran talks

    EU official rejects Turkey as venue for Iran talks

    By Glenn Kessler

    The European Union’s foreign policy chief has accepted Iran’s proposal to meet Dec. 5 but has rejected Istanbul as a venue, according to a copy of the letter seen by The Washington Post.

    The exchange is the latest in a lengthy debate over when and where to hold talks between Iran and six nations eager to negotiate restraints on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Iran earlier this week proposed holding the talks on Nov. 23 or Dec. 5 in Turkey, but that would have meant that Turkish officials would host the event and presumably join in. The countries now involved in the long-stalled talks — the United States, Britain, France, China, Russia and Germany — are wary of adding another to the mix at this point.

    “As far as the venue is concerned, holding the meeting in Istanbul is not possible for Her Excellency Lady [Catherine] Ashton, but she suggests that the meeting might take place in Vienna, or alternatively in Switzerland,” wrote James Morrison, Ashton’s chief of staff, in the letter to Iranian officials.

    Iran’s response earlier this week suggested it was only interested in meeting on a single day, which U.S. and European officials argue will leave little time for a productive session. Ashton suggested in Friday’s letter that the meetings begin on Dec. 5 with a dinner, continue on Dec. 6 and then conclude at midday on Dec. 7 with a news conference.

    While Ashton’s letters have repeatedly stressed an interest in discussing Iran’s nuclear program, the Iranian responses have been silent on the subject. Iranian officials have publicly declared they have no interest in discussing their nuclear program, despite new sanctions imposed by the U.N. Security Council for Tehran’s failure to halt uranium enrichment.

    By Glenn Kessler  | November 12, 2010; 11:45 AM ET

    via Checkpoint Washington – EU official rejects Turkey as venue for Iran talks.

  • US open to Turkey as venue for later round of Iran talks

    US open to Turkey as venue for later round of Iran talks

    WASHINGTON — The United States said Friday that any new international nuclear talks with Iran should take place first in central Europe but added that follow-on talks could be held in Turkey, as Iran has proposed.

    In Brussels, European Union diplomacy chief Catherine Ashton on Friday agreed to resume the long-stalled nuclear talks between six world powers and Iran on December 5, and suggested they be held in Austria or Switzerland.

    “Istanbul could still be a location for a second follow-on meeting,” US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley told reporters. “But the general consensus is that the first meeting should be somewhere in central Europe.”

    Iran this week proposed the talks take place in Istanbul but “Ashton’s preference is that the first meeting take place somewhere else in Europe and has proposed Austria or Switzerland,” her office said.

    Ashton represents Britain, China, France, Russia, Germany and the United States in the talks aimed at allaying Western fears that Iran’s nuclear program masks a weapons drive under the guise of a civilian program, which Tehran denies.

    Crowley was vague about why it was better to launch the talks in Central Europe than in Turkey. “We think it’s a more appropriate and a more convenient location for a first meeting.”

    The last round of negotiations over a nuclear fuel-swap deal deadlocked in October 2009 and Washington this week said there could be multiple meetings and multiple venues.

    Turkey and Brazil early this year brokered a modified fuel-swap deal which Washington rejected before securing a fourth round of UN Security Council sanctions against Iran.

    via AFP: US open to Turkey as venue for later round of Iran talks.

  • E.U. Responds to Iran About Talks on Nuclear Program

    E.U. Responds to Iran About Talks on Nuclear Program

    BRUSSELS — Talks on Iran’s nuclear program moved a step closer Thursday as the European Union foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, agreed to one of two dates for discussions suggested by Tehran, a diplomat said, although Ms. Ashton proposed an alternative location.

    Ms. Ashton would lead the negotiations with Iran alongside officials from the United States, Russia, China, France, Germany and Britain.

    On Thursday Ms. Ashton’s officials were drafting a letter to Iran’s senior negotiator, Saeed Jalili, agreeing to talks Dec. 5, but proposing that they take place not in Istanbul, as Iran had suggested, but in another country, probably Switzerland.

    Ms. Ashton may also suggest that the discussions are conducted over three days rather than one, said a European diplomat speaking on condition of anonymity because an official announcement has yet to be made.

    In recent weeks an exchange of letters between Ms. Ashton and the Iranians has brought the prospect of the resumption of talks significantly closer. In a letter dated Nov. 9, shown to The International Herald Tribune, Iran said Mr. Jalili would be ready to meet on Nov. 23 or Dec. 5 in Istanbul.

    The diplomat confirmed Thursday that discussions between the Americans, Russians, Chinese and Europeans had taken place in the last 48 hours on how to react to Iran’s letter of this week.

    “Catherine Ashton is expected to respond to Iran by the end of the week and is expected to agree to Iran’s proposal to meet on December 5, but not in Istanbul,” the diplomat said.

    Instead the discussions would take place “somewhere in Europe – most likely Switzerland” with the possibility of a follow-up meeting for Istanbul.

    If agreement can be reached the discussion will be the first high-level negotiations in more than a year.

    If Iran accepts Switzerland as a venue, Geneva is a likely location.

    The movement follows agreement on new United Nations and European Union sanctions aimed at putting pressure on Iran over its nuclear program. This reflects fears that Iran’s uranium-enrichment program is designed to create the option of a weapons program, while Iran insists its nuclear ambitions are limited to peaceful purposes.

    European officials believe that sanctions are beginning to have an impact. They say they are pursuing a dual strategy designed to force the government in Tehran into a dialogue.

    Iran’s most recent letter, like one that preceded it on October 29, referred to a stipulation in a previous communication from Mr. Jalili’s on July 6, laying down conditions for the talks. In that letter, the Iranian negotiator said that discussions should aim to engage and cooperate, that they should be committed to the rationale of dialogue, and that Ms. Ashton should state her “position on the nuclear weapons of the Zionist Regime.” That is a reference to Israel, which does not confirm or deny that it has nuclear weapons.

    Last year the United States suggested that Iran ship uranium to another country for enrichment so as to try to ensure that Tehran could continue with its civil nuclear project, but did not have access to enough highly enriched uranium to make a bomb.

    A version of this article appeared in print on November 12, 2010, on page A10, in The International Herald Tribune.

    via E.U. Responds to Iran About Talks on Nuclear Program – NYTimes.com.

  • Iran Must Not be “Targeted” by Missile Shield, Turkey Says

    Iran Must Not be “Targeted” by Missile Shield, Turkey Says

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul said in an interview aired yesterday that his government would object to a potential NATO missile defense system that identified Iran as a particular threat, Agence France-Presse reported (see GSN, Nov. 1).

    “NATO is a defense organization. A defense system is being developed against anyone in the world who has ballistic missiles and does not belong to NATO,” Gul, whose nations is one of the military alliance’s 28 members, told the BBC.

    Ahead of next week’s summit in Lisbon, Portugal, NATO has yet to formalize the reason for a possible European missile shield. Officials from alliance member states have highlighted Iran in making their case for the system (see GSN, Oct. 15). NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen recently, though, avoided discussing particular threats the shield would be intended to counter (see GSN, Nov. 3).

    “Mentioning one country, Iran … is wrong and will not happen,” said Gul, whose government has warming relations with Tehran. “A particular country will not be targeted. … We will definitely not accept that.”

    NATO states are anticipated to determine at the summit whether to officially include missile defense as a core alliance objective. Doing so would allow the organization to move forward with a plan to enhance and integrate national antimissile systems to provide alliance-wide protection.

    Ankara would like to see the missile defense system provide full coverage to Turkey and not only the territory that is close to Iran, say diplomats (Agence France-Presse/Spacewar.com, Nov. 8).