Category: Iran

  • Next Round of Iran Nuclear Talks Set for Istanbul

    Next Round of Iran Nuclear Talks Set for Istanbul

    071210 hota ashton1Iran and major world powers agreed to continue talks on Iran’s nuclear program in late January in Istanbul, EU’s foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton told Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Tuesday. Ashton called Davutoglu on the phone and informed him about the decision, Turkish Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

    Six powers –the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany– who are represented by EU’s top diplomat Ashton have had nearly two days of talks on the Iranian nuclear program in Geneva. These countries highlight the need for Iran to comply with its international obligations.

    During the phone call, Ashton said Turkey’s contribution to talks was appreciated. For his part, Davutoglu said Turkey would continue to play a role that would help achieve global and regional peace, according to foreign ministry statement.

    Davutoglu also said that he would be happy to host participants of talks in Istanbul.

    In a statement earlier in the day, Ashton had said, “we and Iran agreed to a continuation of these talks in late January in Istanbul where we plan to discuss practical ideas and ways of cooperating toward resolution of our core concerns about the nuclear issue.”

    AA

  • Iran agrees to more nuclear talks in Istanbul

    Iran agrees to more nuclear talks in Istanbul

    Two days of international talks on Iran’s nuclear program wrapped up in Geneva with an agreement to meet again in January in Istanbul.

    “We have had nearly two days of detailed substantive talks focusing on the Iranian nuclear program and the need for Iran to comply with its international obligations,” European Union High Representative for Foreign Policy Catherine Ashton said in a statement Tuesday at the conclusion of the talks between diplomats from the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China, Russia and Iran.

    “We and Iran agreed to a continuation of these talks in late January in Istanbul, where we plan to discuss practical ideas and ways of cooperating towards a resolution of our core concerns about the nuclear issue,” Ashton concluded, walking out without taking any questions from journalists.

    American and European officials said expectations were low going into the discussions –- the first international nuclear talks with Iran in over a year — which came days after two Iranian nuclear scientists were targeted for assassination.

    Iran’s nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili denounced as a terror act the killing of one of the targeted scientists, Majid Shahriari, at the commencement of the meeting.

    Talks were “extensive and difficult,” a Western diplomat said on the condition of anonymity late Monday. There was, however, he said, “considerable discussion of Iran’s nuclear program.”

    The so-called P5+1 group “displayed unity in urging Iran to address concerns of the international community and to live up to its obligations,” he said.

    Ashton’s reference to more “practical” discussions to be held at the forthcoming meeting in Istanbul suggests the possibility for talks on updating a nuclear fuel swap deal by removing the quantity of Iran’s stockpile of low enriched uranium in exchange for the international community providing nuclear isotopes to treat cancer patients in the country.

    While Washington’s lead negotiator at the talks, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Bill Burns, had “no formal meetings” with the Iranian delegation, a U.S. official said Tuesday that “we had several informal interactions, which were useful to reinforce our main concerns.”

    Posted by Laura Rozen 09:46 AM

    via Iran agrees to more nuclear talks in Istanbul – Laura Rozen – POLITICO.com.

  • Iran says won’t discuss stopping uranium enrichment

    Iran says won’t discuss stopping uranium enrichment

    Iran will refuse to talk about stopping its enrichment of uranium at the next meeting on its nuclear program in January in Istanbul with six major powers, its chief nuclear negotiator said on Tuesday.

    “I am announcing openly and clearly that Iran will not discuss a uranimum enrichment halt in the next meeting in Istanbul with major powers,” Saeed Jalili told a news conference after two days of talks with the six powers. (Reuters)

    via Iran says won’t discuss stopping uranium enrichment – Israel News, Ynetnews.

  • Next Round of Iran Nuclear Talks Set for Istanbul

    Next Round of Iran Nuclear Talks Set for Istanbul

    ISTANBUL (Hurriyet Daily News)–Iran and six world powers ended talks Tuesday with an agreement to hold their next round of nuclear negotiations in Istanbul early next year.

    iran world powers to hold 2011 talks in turkey 2010 12 07 l

    “We and Iran agreed to a continuation of these talks in late January in Istanbul, where we plan to discuss practical ideas and ways of cooperating toward resolution of our core concerns about the nuclear issue,” European Union foreign-policy chief Catherine Ashton said in a statement after two days of talks in Geneva on Iran’s nuclear program.

    Following the Geneva meetings, Ashton called Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Tuesday to inform him about the decision to hold the next rounds of talks in Istanbul.

    The talks in Geneva were positive, Ashton told Davutoglu, according to Foreign Ministry spokesman Selcuk Unal. “Davutoglu welcomed the decision to hold the next talks in Turkey and conveyed his gratification about hosting the meeting,” Unal told the Hurriyet Daily News & Economic Review on Tuesday. “He said Turkey would continue to contribute to global and regional peace.”

    According to Unal, the Iranians had told Ankara on more than one occasion that they would feel more comfortable meeting in Turkey. The spokesman also noted that Ashton had called Davutoglu just prior to the Geneva talks and thanked the minister for Turkey’s contribution to restarting the discussion with Iran.

    Ashton had previously rejected Tehran’s preference for a meeting in Istanbul, where Iran would have Turkish allies on the sidelines. Asked if Turkey would participate in the January talks, Unal said no involvement on the part of Ankara has yet been planned.

    Following the two days of talks in Geneva between Iran and six major powers – the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany – Ashton said in a statement that they were ready to address and seek common ground with Iran.

    “We have had nearly two days of detailed substantive talks, focusing on the Iranian nuclear program and the need for Iran to comply with its international obligations. The countries I represent are united in seeking a resolution of the international community’s concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear program, which is the central purpose of these talks,” Ashton said. “We recognize Iran’s rights but insist it fulfill its obligations. We are ready to address and seek common ground also on other issues of mutual interest.”

    Saed Jalili, Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator, confirmed the timing and venue of the planned talks, while saying his country would not waver from its insistence that it has a right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.

    “We reject the idea of talks under pressure,” he told reporters. Avoiding any mention of nuclear issues, Jalili would only say the talks will be “on the issue of cooperation” between Tehran and the six world powers.

    In Iran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said lifting the sanctions imposed by the United Nations and others would help achieve progress in the talks.

    “If you come to talks with sincerity, loyalty to the law, friendship and respect for the definite rights of the Iranian nation, and then cancel the wrong mistakes you made – which didn’t have any impact on the Iranian nation – and cancel resolutions, sanctions and some restrictions that you imposed, it will definitely be helpful,” state TV’s website quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

    Talks between Iran and the six world powers went to a recess Monday with no sign that Tehran was ready to discuss the U.N. Security Council’s demands that it curb nuclear activities that could be harnessed to make weapons, an official at the negotiations told the Associated Press. “About 75 percent” of Monday’s three-hour morning session was devoted to nuclear issues, the official said.

    That raised some hope because the Islamic republic had come to the table insisting that the negotiations address Iran’s nuclear program only peripherally – if at all.

    Although the afternoon plenary was also mostly taken up with nuclear issues, the official said it was dominated by Jalili’s complaints about past wrongs committed by the West against his country in the nuclear field, in statements reaching back in history to 1953.

    That clearly fell short of hopes from the six other countries that Iran would at least address the Security Council demands as a start to discussions on enrichment and related issues. “Obviously we have not made progress on the substance,” said the official.

    Tehran says it does not want atomic weapons and insists its nuclear program is only designed to provide more power for its growing population. But it is under four sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to freeze enrichment of uranium, which can be used to make fuel for reactors as well as fissile warhead material.

    Last year’s talks in Vienna resulted in announcements that Iran had agreed to give up much of its enriched uranium in exchange for fuel for a medical-research reactor. However the deal fell apart and no further meetings were held for the last 14 months.

    Iran said in November that any nuclear fuel swap with the major powers must be based on an agreement it signed with Brazil and Turkey in May.

    Turkey and Brazil brokered a fuel-swap deal with Tehran that would have seen Iran ship much of its low-enriched uranium to Turkey in return for nuclear fuel rods needed for a medical research reactor. Western nations rejected the deal and backed a fourth round of U.N. sanctions against Iran on June 9.

    via Next Round of Iran Nuclear Talks Set for Istanbul | Asbarez Armenian News.

  • Iran and the G5+1 to continue talks in Istanbul in January

    Iran and the G5+1 to continue talks in Istanbul in January

    By BNO News

    TEHRAN, IRAN (BNO NEWS) — Iran on Tuesday announced that it will continue negotiations with the Group 5+1 (the five permanent United Nations Security Council members plus Germany) in Istanbul, Turkey, in late January.

    According to the semi-official Fars news agency, the two sides agreed on the date and place of the next round of talks following the end of the third session of the latest round of talks in Geneva, Switzerland.

    The next round of negotiations will be aimed at cooperation talks and finding common grounds for such cooperation. Iran added that a debate on proliferation is also needed but no discussion of Iran’s nuclear rights will take place.

    “Iran accepts talks merely in light of cooperation and over a range of topics jointly considered (and desired) by both sides,” said Iranian chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili. “We emphasized squarely that we do not accept any kind of talks in the framework of the pressure strategy and that the Iranian nation’s right is not negotiable and cannot be the topic of talks.”

    During the third round of talks, Iran agreed to discuss nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament as well as cooperation in civilian nuclear technology. The three topics were demanded by Iran in order to agree to participate in the negotiations.

    Iranian officials said that the talks were held under a positive and constructive atmosphere. International observers indicated that following the positive results, it is probable that the negotiations will result in a framework for the continuation of the talks.

    Many expected that the negotiations will broke after the first session on Monday. However, Iran and the G5+1 agreed to hold a second session on Tuesday and furthermore to resume talks next year.

    (Copyright 2010 by BNO News B.V. All rights reserved. Info: sales@bnonews.com.)

  • U.S. And NATO Allies Escalate Military Buildup Against Iran

    U.S. And NATO Allies Escalate Military Buildup Against Iran

    U.S. And NATO Allies Escalate Military Buildup Against Iran
    Rick Rozoff

    The new Strategic Concept adopted by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization at its summit in Lisbon, Portugal on November 19-20 reiterated the U.S.-led military bloc’s determination to expand military partnerships and deployments throughout the so-called Greater Middle East, including in the Persian Gulf. [1]

    The Alliance’s doctrine for the next decade contains the assertion that “we attach great importance to peace and stability in the Gulf region, and we intend to strengthen our cooperation in the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative,” [2] the reference being to the decision reached at the bloc’s 2004 summit in Turkey to upgrade partnerships with the seven members of NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue program – Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia – and the six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council – Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates – to the status of the Partnership for Peace program used to graduate 12 Eastern European nations to full NATO membership over the last 11 years.

    Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates have formally responded to the initiative by forging bilateral relations with NATO, and Oman and Saudi Arabia have cooperated with the military alliance in ad hoc endeavors ranging from conferences to hosting visits of NATO naval groups. [3]

    The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is also one of NATO’s 48 Troop Contributing Nations for the war in Afghanistan and provides air bases to NATO member states for the war in that country. Until recently Canadian aircraft and troops operated out of Camp Mirage in Dubai, reportedly at the Al Minhad Air Base, where Dutch, Australian and New Zealand military forces have also been based for the Afghan war and operations in the Arabian Sea.

    Britain also employs the Al Minhad Air Base as a “final hopping point” for transport planes to “carry troops and supplies to Afghanistan.” In addition, the base supplies logistical support to British warships in the Persian Gulf. In the words of a British military official, “It’s the right distance from the UK and the right distance from Afghanistan, in a safe country.” [4]

    As is evident by the location of the 13 nations targeted by the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, from Mauritania on the west coast of Africa to the monarchies and sheikdoms of the Persian Gulf, NATO is complementing and reinforcing U.S. military objectives and deployments from the Atlantic Ocean to the Indian Ocean. There is a NATO overlay to the Pentagon’s Africa Command and Central Command, converging in Egypt, the only African nation still in the second command which reaches to the Chinese and Russian borders in Kazakhstan to the east.

    The USS Abraham Lincoln and USS Harry S. Truman nuclear-powered supercarrier strike groups are currently in the Arabian Sea along with the only non-American nuclear aircraft carrier in the world, France’s Charles de Gaulle [5], conducting operations from the Horn of Africa to Afghanistan.

    Over 150,000 troops under U.S. and NATO command are waging war in Afghanistan, including in the provinces of Herat, Farah and Nimroz on Iran’s eastern border.

    In 2004 NATO airlifted Afghan government troops loyal to President Hamid Karzai to Herat province to depose the province’s governor, Ismail Khan, whose son was killed in the process, and seize the Shindand Air Base, 20 miles from the Iranian border.

    Earlier this year the Pentagon announced plans to spend $131 million to upgrade the air base. As a press report last May put it, the expansion and modernization of the base is occurring “as the U.S. works to strengthen the militaries and missile defenses of allies in the region and presses at the United Nations for a new round of sanctions aimed at forcing Iran to curb its nuclear program.” [6]

    To the south of Afghanistan’s Nimroz province is the Pakistani province of Balochistan, where the U.S. and NATO have been conducting helicopter raids and surveillance flights and where it was recently reported that “the United States military and its coalition partners in Afghanistan” have been granted the right to “maintain a presence” at a Pakistani military base in the capital of Quetta. [7] By some accounts the Pentagon and NATO are establishing an air base in the province. [8]

    North of Afghanistan’s border with Iran is the former Soviet republic of Turkmenistan, which adjoins Iran from Afghanistan to the Caspian Sea. In January of 2009 General David Petraeus, at the time head of U.S. Central Command and now commander of all American and NATO troops in Afghanistan, led a delegation to Turkmenistan to consolidate transit and other support for the war in Afghanistan and to build bilateral military ties.

    Last summer a news source by no means unfriendly to U.S. foreign policy objectives revealed that “The U.S. has gained access to use almost all the military airfields of Turkmenistan, including the airport in Nebit-Dag near the Iranian border, which was reconstructed at American expense. In September 2004, at the Mary-2 airfield, U.S. military experts appeared and began reconstructing the facility with the help of Arab construction companies, which provoked the protest of Moscow….” [9]

    North of Turkmenistan along the Caspian coastline, one nation removed from Iran, is Kazakhstan, the largest and richest nation in Central Asia and one which has a 4,251-mile border with Russia and a 951-mile one with China. [10]

    Last month the U.S. State Department signed an agreement with the country that allows U.S. military aircraft “to fly across the North Pole and through Kazakhstan air space to supply American forces in Afghanistan,” thereby “mak[ing] it faster and cheaper to send troops and materiel to the Afghan war zone.” [11]

    The U.S. has also recently confirmed that it will supply Kazakhstan with six retrofitted UH-1 Iroquois (Huey) helicopters to be used in the Caspian Sea where border demarcation issues exist among its five littoral nations: Kazakhstan, Iran, Russia, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.

    In late October Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev met with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and afterward announced that Kazakh troops would be assigned to NATO’s International Security Assistance Force headquarters in the Afghan capital. Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, on opposite ends of the Caspian Sea, along with Azerbaijan’s South Caucasus neighbors Armenia and Georgia, are the only non-European nations that have been granted a NATO Individual Partnership Action Plan.

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently returned from visits to Kazakhstan, where she attended the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) summit in the nation’s capital and met with President Nazarbayev and Foreign Minister Saudabayev to discuss “various aspects of the U.S.-Kazakhstan strategic partnership,” [12] and afterward to Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Bahrain.

    On December 2 Hillary met with Kyrgyz President Roza Otunbayeva [13] and indicated that the Pentagon has no intention of leaving the Transit Center at Manas (formerly the Manas Air Base) in Kyrgyzstan where the latest figures estimate that 50,000 U.S. and NATO troops transit each month into and out of Afghanistan. According to a Reuters dispatch, “Clinton said Washington would examine again in 2014 whether it needed the Manas base.” [14]

    On the same day a Kyrgyz website disclosed that Foreign Minister Ruslan Kazakbaev met with Dirk Brengelmann, NATO’s Assistant Secretary General for Political Affairs and Security Policy, to discuss bilateral cooperation.

    Clinton next travelled to Uzbekistan on December 2 in the first visit by a Secretary of State to the country since Colin Powell’s nine years ago.

    During her trip the local press quoted earlier statements by two of Clinton’s subordinates at a subcommittee hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs on November 17:

    Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Robert Blake affirmed that “This administration considers Central Asia to be an important pillar of our security policy and regional US interests,” and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Afghanistan, Pakistan and Central Asia David Sedney said, “We must increase our engagement with Central Asia at all levels.” [15]

    Across the Caspian from Kazakhstan, the U.S. and NATO have cultivated Azerbaijan as a military outpost on the sea and in the volatile South Caucasus region. [16] Azerbaijan borders Iran.

    The Azerbaijan-NATO Cooperation Institute and the Romanian embassy – the current NATO Contact Point Embassy in Azerbaijan – will host a conference entitled “NATO After the Lisbon Summit: New Strategic Concept” in the capital of Baku on December 7.

    Recently Borut Grgic, founder of the European Policy Centre’s transCaspian Initiative and senior fellow at the Atlantic Council – the U.S.-based pro-NATO think tank [17] – stated:

    “NATO has a stabilizing role to play in the region, most of all in providing the broader security framework for the countries of the South Caucasus.

    “I think all three South Caucasus countries can become NATO member states….” [18] All three nations – Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia – have NATO Individual Partnership Action Plans and have troop contingents assigned to NATO’s International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. Georgia is a U.S. and NATO frontline on the Black Sea and in the Caucasus. The American guided missile destroyer USS Gonzalez visited the Georgian Black Sea port of Batumi last week and on December 3 American ambassador John Bass stated:

    “The United States remains firmly committed to Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. We enjoy a strong defense relationship, defense cooperation, and we’re currently working closely with the Ministry of Defense and other ministries in Georgia to improve Georgia’s ability to defend itself.” [19]

    On December 1 the chairman of the Armenian parliament’s Committee on Defense, National Security and Internal Affairs gave a lecture at the NATO Defense College in Rome. On December 3 NATO Deputy Secretary General Claudio Bisogniero met with Armenia’s representative to NATO, Samvel Mkrtchyan, to discuss current and future cooperation. Armenia borders Iran and has maintained good relations with its neighbor. It is also a member of the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization. Ties with Iran and Russia will not grow any closer as Armenia is further integrated with NATO.

    After leaving Central Asia, on December 3 Clinton was in Bahrain to deliver a special address at the Manama Dialogue 2010 Regional Security Summit sponsored by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies and the Kingdom of Bahrain.

    Her comments included:

    “Amongst other things, we seek to strengthen the Gulf security dialogue, which represents our primary security coordination mechanism with the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. The dialogue is designed to bolster the capabilities of GCC partners to deter and defend against conventional and unconventional threats and improve interoperability with the United States and with each other. We all know that efforts to deepen cooperation, coordination and transparency among this region’s militaries would yield broad benefits that extend to the whole range of modern threats.” [20]

    The Gulf Security Dialogue is, in the State Department’s own words, “the U.S. Government’s principal security coordination mechanism with the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council. The Dialogue supports our enduring interest in the region, focusing on a wide range of political-military issues, including shared strategic challenges in the wider region and enhancing partnerships in the areas of security cooperation, counterterrorism, border security, nonproliferation and maritime security.” [21]

    Bahrain lies directly across the Persian Gulf from Iran, hosts the headquarters of the U.S. Fifth Fleet, is an active member of NATO’s Istanbul Cooperation Initiative and has security personnel assigned to NATO’s International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan.

    The United Arab Emirates, the only Persian Gulf state that is an official Troop Contributing Nation for NATO in Afghanistan, has just hosted a two-day Middle East Missile and Air Defense Symposium in Abu Dhabi. On the first day, Deputy Chief of Staff of the United Arab Emirates Armed Forces Major General Ali Mohammed Subaih Al Kaâ’bi said that “an integrated missile defence Center of Excellence along with CENTCOM [U.S. Central Command] is now a reality.”

    Central Command chief Marine General James Mattis gave the second keynote address on December 5 and said “CENTCOM is eager to engage in countering ballistic and cruise missiles and providing a robust missile defence….” [22]

    The conference’s first plenary session was chaired by Lieutenant General (Retired) Stanley Green, the Vice President of International Business Development, Air and Missile Defense at Lockheed Martin (and formerly with Raytheon Company), and Major General Richard Shook, Mobilization Assistant to Commander of the US Air Forces Central Command, gave a presentation on “Regional Integrated Air and Missile Defense – The Operational Picture.”

    Brigadier General David Mann, commander of the 32nd Army Air and Missile Defense Command, delivered a presentation entitled “A Regional Approach to Missile Defense – The Integrated Air and Missile Defense Center (IAMDC).”

    The second plenary session heard from – as they are described by the sponsors of the event – Clayton Holt, Middle East Division Chief, Directorate of International Affairs at the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency, on the subject of “Ballistic Missile Defense Overview,” from Captain Hervé Boy, chief of the Program Expertise Office at the French Navy Headquarters, on “Maritime Assets and Interoperability in the AMD System,” and from Major General (Retired) John Urias, Deputy Commanding General of the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command (and Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems vice president for Force Applications Programs), on “Integrated Air & Missile Defense – A Theater Imperative.”

    The December 6 sessions were addressed by Major General (Retired) John Brooks, Vice President, International Business Development, President, Northrop Grumman International, Inc.; David Des Roches, Director, Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, International Security Affairs; the Pentagon’s Colonel Ole Knudson; and Colonel Marc Miglior, Project Officer in Charge, Air Defense and Ballistic Missile Defense, French Air Force Headquarters. [23]

    Last year French President Nicolas Sarkozy opened a military complex – with a navy base, air base, and training camp – in the United Arab Emirates, his country’s first permanent base in the Persian Gulf. In doing so Paris joined the U.S., Britain, Canada, the Netherlands. Australia and New Zealand in maintaining a military presence in the country.

    The U.S. is consolidating a global interceptor missile system not only in all of Europe as was formalized at last month’s NATO summit, but throughout the Black Sea region and into the Middle East. Two years ago the U.S. deployed an anti-missile Forward-Based X-Band Radar with a 2,900-mile range in Israel which it staffs with approximately 120 service members, and will station 24 Standard Missile-3 interceptors in Romania.

    The U.S. and NATO have also been pressuring Turkey to host missile shield facilities. According to one report, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan “is concerned that Turkey’s participation might later give Israel protection from an Iranian counter-strike.” [24]

    Earlier this year Washington announced the sale of land-based interceptor missiles to Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. It has supplied both Patriot Advanced Capability-3 and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile systems to Gulf Cooperation Council states – Patriot missiles to Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia and a THAAD missile shield system to the United Arab Emirates – and has deployed sea-based Standard Missile-3 interceptors in the Gulf on Aegis class warships. [25] There are currently three Aegis class guided missile destroyers in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea: USS Halsey, Momsen and Shoup.

    On October 21 the U.S. announced a $60 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia for advanced fighter jets, helicopters, missiles and other weaponry and equipment in what has been calculated to be the largest weapons deal in American history. The month before, the Financial Times estimated that Washington plans to sell $123 billion worth of arms to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and the United Arab Emirates. [26]

    Britain recently concluded two weeks of joint military training with the air force and navy of the United Arab Emirates at the Al Dhafra Air Base. The war games, under the codename Operation Air Khanjar, included aerial combat exercises with Royal Air Force [RAF] Typhoon jet fighters and airborne surveillance aircraft and Emirati F-16s and Mirages.

    The two countries’ navies also participated as “training increased in complexity as the operation developed, with more advanced flight manoeuvres and joint exercises with the British HMS Cumberland, which was conducting maritime security operations in the Gulf.”

    “The Royal Navy relies on the UAE for ports, and the RAF participates in training alongside Emirati forces at the Air Warfare Centre.”

    The Emirates’ Al Minhad Air Base, in addition to accommodating Western military aircraft, “provides logistical support to British vessels deployed in the Gulf for ‘broader regional stability’ and enhanced ties with the UAE.” [27]

    NATO has announced that it is prepared to extend its six-year-old NATO Training Mission – Iraq, which has trained over 10,000 military personnel – officers and troops – and internal security forces, beyond 2011. [28]

    After the NATO summit in Portugal, an editorial in the Washington Post stated:

    “NATO’s Lisbon summit meeting last weekend was encouraging. All of the alliance’s members – and the more than 20 other nations that have joined the international force in Afghanistan – signed on to a plan to continue the mission until at least the end of 2014….

    “The Afghan experience….offers the United States the assurance that should it have to undertake wars such as Afghanistan in the future, it will not need to act alone.” [29]

    When a confrontation – or far worse – with Iran occurs, the U.S. and NATO will have military forces in place all around the nation.
    1) Lisbon Summit: NATO Proclaims Itself Global Military Force
    Stop NATO, November 22, 2010

    2) NATO In Persian Gulf: From Third World War To Istanbul
    Stop NATO, February 6, 2009

    3) NATO’s Role In The Military Encirclement Of Iran
    Stop NATO, February 10, 2010

    4) The National, December 5, 2010
    5) Arabian Sea: Center Of West’s 21st Century War
    Stop NATO, October 25, 2010

    6) Bloomberg News, May 20, 2010
    7) Asian News International, November 25, 2010
    8) Daily Times, November 28, 2010
    9) Catherine A. Fitzpatrick, Is the U.S. Violating Turkmenistan’s
    Neutrality with the NDN?
    EurasiaNet, August 1, 2010

    10) Kazakhstan: U.S., NATO Seek Military Outpost Between Russia And China
    Stop NATO, April 14, 2010

    11) Central Asia Newswire, November 15, 2010
    12) RTT News, November 29, 2010
    13) Kyrgyzstan: Bloodstained Geopolitical Chessboard
    Stop NATO, June 16, 2010

    14) Reuters, December 2, 2010
    15) UzReport, December 3, 2010
    16) Pentagon Chief In Azerbaijan: Afghan War Arc Stretches To Caspian And
    Caucasus
    Stop NATO, June 8, 2010

    17) Atlantic Council: Securing The 21st Century For NATO
    Stop NATO, April 30, 2010

    18) News.Az, November 26, 2010
    19) Civil Georgia, December 3, 2010
    20) International Institute for Strategic Studies, December 3, 2010

    21) U.S. Department of State, March 22, 2010

    22) Khaleej Times, December 5, 2010
    23) Institute of Near East and Gulf Military Analysis (INEGMA)
    http://www.inegma.com/?navigation=event_details&cat=fe&eid=46
    24) Zaman, November 30, 2010
    25) Middle East Loses Trillions As U.S. Strikes Record Arms Deals
    Stop NATO, September 2, 2010

    26) Arabian Sea: Center Of West’s 21st Century War
    Stop NATO, October 25, 2010

    27) The National, December 5, 2010
    28) Iraq: NATO Assists In Building New Middle East Proxy Army
    Stop NATO, August 13, 2010

    29) Washington Post, November 25, 2010
    ….
    NATO: Afghan War Model For Future 21st Century Operations
    Stop NATO, November 19, 2010