Category: Iran

  • Obama gives CIA controlled Pentagon order to start FED’s WWIII

    Obama gives CIA controlled Pentagon order to start FED’s WWIII

    Cocked PistolRussia and China have both vetoed a UN Resolution put forward by the United States to use military force against Syria.  Both Russia and China know that the uprising in Syria was orchestrated by the United States using CIA mercenaries.  Russia and China have always claimed that the United States was involved and the United States was fabricating evidence against Syria in order to get a UN Resolution to use military force against Syria.  Today one such fabrication was uncovered when a young woman who the United States government claimed was mutilated and murdered appeared on Syrian TV and identified herself as Zainab Alhusni.  The U.S. government’s false report of mutilation and murder stirred outrage and condemnation across the world.

    Today it has been learned that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA has ordered the CIA controlled Pentagon (Obama appointed former CIA director Leon Panetta as Defense Secretary in May) to ready troops for military strikes against Syria despite the UN Security Council vetoing any military action against Syria.  Obama for the second time this year has unilaterally committed US forces to a war that Congress has not authorized.  Why is Obama starting wars without Congressional approval?  British subject BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA was illegally put in office by the European bankers in order to cause the economic collapse of the United States.  The United States is the last obstacle to enslaving the World under a New World Order.

    BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA has successfully bankrupted the United States so the next step to bring about a New World Order is to start WWIII.  Attacking Syria will start WWIII.   Syrian President Bashar Assad on Tuesday threatened to set fire to the Middle East, and especially Israel, if NATO (the United States’ surrogate military force) attacks Syria.  Assad said: “If a crazy measure is taken against Damascus, I will need not more than six hours to transfer hundreds of rockets and missiles to the Golan Heights to fire them at Tel Aviv.” According to the Fars news agency, the Syrian president stressed that Damascus will also call on Hezbollah in Lebanon to launch a fierce rocket and missile attack on Israel, such that Israeli intelligence could never imagine. “All these events will happen in three hours, but in the second three hours, Iran will attack the US warships in the Persian Gulf and the US and European interests will be targeted simultaneously,” Assad said.

    Israel will strike back with a  massive nuclear retaliation against “enemy” nations should its existence as a Jewish state be jeopardized through military attack. Israeli leaders created the “Samson Option” in the mid-1960s, inspired by the very first suicide bomber named Samson, who destroyed a Philistine temple, killing himself and thousands of Philistines.

    In 1977, after a right-wing coalition under Menachen Begin took power, the Israelis began to use the Samson Option not just to deter attack but to allow Israel to “redraw the political map of the Middle East” by expanding hundreds of thousands of Israeli settlers into the West Bank and Gaza.

    To dissuade the Soviet Union from interfering with its plans, Prime Minister Begin immediately “gave orders to target Soviet cities” for nuclear attack. Its American spy Jonathan Pollard was caught stealing such nuclear targeting information from the U.S. military in 1985.

    Today, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has put Israel on nuclear alert and is now arming missiles with nuclear weapons.  Netanyahu knows that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA is preparing U.S. forces to attack Syria with or without UN or Congressional approval.   Netanyahu knows the British agent BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA intends on launching an unprovoked attack against Syria because doing so will spark a nuclear war.

    The United States is already at DEFCON 1 “COCKED PISTOL” readiness status.  DEFCON 1 means nuclear war is imminent.  The United States was put on DEFCON 1 readiness status on September 27, 2011, by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA – read PRESS Core article titled “Obama and Globalists converging on Denver Deep Underground Military Base for September 27, 2011“.  On September 27, 2011 Obama ordered the United States military, the DHS and FEMA to make ready for a imminent nuclear war.

    BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and the Federal Reserve bankers (aka the shadow government  –

    1) The Rothschild Family – London

    2) The Rothschild Family – Berlin

    3) The Lazard Brothers – Paris

    4) Israel Seiff – Italy

    5) Kuhn-Loeb Company – Germany

    6) The Warburgs – Amsterdam

    7) The Warburgs – Hamburg

    8) Lehman Brothers – New York

    9) Goldman Sachs – New York and

    10) The Rockefeller Family – New York) have decided that the time is now to start WWIII.

    A DOD / DHS / FEMA Continuity of Operations Plan drill at one of the United States most secure Deep Underground Military Bases located beneath the Denver International Airport was scheduled for September 27, 2011 as a diversion – to deceive the American people.  The drill was the cover story to hide the fact that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and the United States shadow government (the Federal Reserve bankers) has ordered the start of WWIII.  DEFCON 1 means Obama intends on starting a nuclear war.

    Short URL: , 8 October 2011

    PAUL W KINCAID

    October 8, 2011 – 9:34 am

    Maryland-based biotechnology firm Emergent BioSolutions on Monday was awarded a $1.25 billion contract to provide the U.S. government with 44.75 million doses of an anthrax vaccine.

    The American people do not realize just how lucky they were on September 11, 2001. 9/11 was a cowardly act of treason by George W Bush and Dick Cheney which resulted in 2,974 fatalities, but if their attack failed the casualties could have been much higher – the entire city of New York could have been lost.

    FEMA had deployed to New York City on September 10 to set up a command post at Pier 29, in preparation for a biowarfare exercise scheduled for September 12, 2001. Source http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/html/news/02_05_22_tripod.shtml

    Rudolph Giuliani let the details of BIOWARFARE EXERCISE TRIPOD II slip in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission. In his testimony, Giuliani testified that FEMA arrived in New York on September 10th to set up a command post located at Pier 29 under the auspices of a ‘biowarfare exercise scheduled for September 12. This explains why Tom Kenney of FEMA’s National Urban Search and Rescue Team, told Dan Rather of CBS News that FEMA had arrived in New York on the night of September 10th. This was originally dismissed as a slip of the tongue. Giuliani was to use this post as a command post on 9/11 after he evacuated WTC Building 7. Giuliani knew when to leave WTC 7 because he got advanced warning that the Trade Towers were about to collapse. “We were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse,” Rudolph Giuliani told Peter Jennings of ABC News.

    I wrote about this false flag attack against the United States by the United States’ own government back in Dec 2008 when PRESS Core was called nbGazette. The article was titled “If the attacks of September 11, 2001 failed George W Bush and Dick Cheney had a backup terrorist attack called Tripod II”

    Obama is planning another false flag attack against the United States and anthrax is once again a part of the United States government’s plan to mass murder thousands of American citizens if the CIA is unsuccessful in detonating a nuke on U.S. soil.

  • No Israel gas transit via Turkey: Ankara

    No Israel gas transit via Turkey: Ankara

    Ankara has rejected requests from its private firms to allow the transit of natural gas produced in Israel through Turkey to Europe, says Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz, Press TV reports.

    Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz
    Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz

    Yildiz noted that private firms have proposed plans to carry Israeli natural gas to Europe via Turkish territory.

    “Had not nine of our nationals been murdered, there could be major developments in the energy distribution in the Mediterranean Sea. [Then] we would not have rejected the demand by private firms,” he said on Friday.

    Yildiz was referring to an Israeli attack on a Gaza-bound flotilla on May 30, 2010 that killed nine Turkish nationals.

    The Israeli attack, which drew worldwide condemnation, severely damaged ties between Turkey and Israel.

    Turkey has repeatedly called on Israel to apologize for the attack and pay compensation to the families of the victims, warning that Ankara-Tel Aviv relations will not normalize if Israel fails to do so.

    Tel Aviv has refused to apologize to Turkey over the deadly raid.

    DB/JG/HJL

    via PressTV – No Israel gas transit via Turkey: Ankara.

  • Turkey urges more natural gas imports from Iran

    Turkey urges more natural gas imports from Iran

    Iranian Deputy Oil Minister Javad Oji said that Turkey has asked Iran to increase its natural gas exports to its northwestern neighbor, the state IRIB TV website reported.

    c 150 100 16777215 0 images stories oct01 15 04 iranOji said that Iran’s current gas exports to Turkey stands at 24 million cubic meters per day on average and expressed Tehran’s readiness to provide Ankara with more natural gas, said the report.

    The two countries have held negotiations in the past over an increase in the gas exports to Turkey, he said, adding that Iran has a capacity to export an average of 36-40 million cubic meters of natural gas per day to Turkey.

    According to the report, Turkey currently has natural gas purchase deals with countries such as Russia, Iran and Azerbaijan, as well as liquefied natural gas (LNG) deals with Nigeria and Algeria.

    In 2009, Iran and Turkey signed an agreement to transfer up to 35 billion cubic meters of Iran’s natural gas to Europe via Turkey.

    Earlier this year, Iran’s First Vice-President Mohammad-Reza Rahimi said exporting Iran’s natural gas to Europe through Turkey would be beneficial for both Tehran and Ankara.

    In a meeting with Turkish Energy and Natural Resources Minister Taner Yildiz in Tehran, Rahimi stressed the need for implementation of all agreements reached between Tehran and Ankara on energy cooperation.

    Yildiz said that his country was ready to increase its cooperation with Iran in the energy field and pointed out that Ankara was determined to help Tehran transit its natural gas to Europe.

    According to Iranian media, the gas pipeline to transfer Iran’s natural gas to Europe is scheduled to become operational in 2014.

    According to Iran’s Petroleum Ministry, Iran’s proved natural gas reserves are about 29,610 cubic kilometers or about 15.8 percent of world’s total reserves. It has the world’s second largest reserves after Russia.

    Iran can step in after Turkey break with Gazprom

    Iran said that it was ready to boost its gas exports to neighboring Turkey, after Turkish Botas ended its deal with Russia’s Gazprom, a senior official told the Mehr news agency.

    “Turkey has previously had talks with Iran in regard to increase the volume of our natural gas export … Iran is ready to boost its export upon the Turkey’s request,” Javad Oji, managing director of the National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC) told Mehr.

    Oji said: “Iran’s gas export to Turkey has increased by 12 percent from March and NIGC has averagely delivered more than 24 million cubic meters of natural gas to Turkish Botas per day.”

    He also said Iran had the capacity to produces 600 million cubic meters of gas.

    In early October, Turkish Botas ended its contract with Russia’s producer Gazprom for buying annually 6 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas due to pricing disagreement.

    When Oji asked about the possibility of any modification of the price of Iran’s exporting gas, he said the deal had “open conditions”.

    “Both sides have authority to hold talks over the price change based on the conditions and gas global market price … But so far no talks in this regards have been held,” Oji said.

    Iran has also excluded Gazprom from development of one of its major oil fields project.

    Source: agencies

    via Turkey urges more natural gas imports from Iran – Tehran Times.

  • Iranian cinema discussed at Istanbul meeting

    Iranian cinema discussed at Istanbul meeting

    TEHRAN – Tarik Zafer Tunaya Cultural Center in Istanbul hosted the session “Iran’s Cinema of Today” on Thursday as part of Iran’s Film Week now underway in Istanbul.

    Cosponsored by the Iranian cultural office in Turkey and Istanbul Municipality, the weeklong festival opened on October 10, the Persian service of MNA reported on Friday.

    The session was attended by experts on cinema of Iran and Turkey Ihsan Kabil and Faysal Soysal, Iranian filmmaker Mohammad-Hadi Karimi and actor Mostafa Zamani.

    Kabil regarded the weeklong event a good opportunity to introduce Iranian cinema and familiarize Turkish people with the cinema of Iran.

    He named Iranian directors like Dariush Mehrjuii, Bahram Beizaii and Kamal Tabrizi and pointed to the young filmmakers and their big successes in the recent years.

    Karimi also called Iranian cinema a developing one in the world and expressed hope that more theaters in the world would be dedicated to films with spiritual themes rather than the cinema of Hollywood.

    “Prophet Joseph (AS)” actor Zamani believed Iran’s cinema would have a bright future since it has good filmmakers and promising youths.

    Soysal who is a graduate of cinema from Iran also said that Iran enjoys rich art and culture with worthwhile activities in cinema, adding that filmmakers must make films for people, not for the festivals.

    Organized by the Iranian Visual Media Institute, 10 films are scheduled to be screened during the event including “Prophet Joseph (AS)” by Farajollah Salahshur, “Canaan” by Mani Haqiqi, “The Day of the Devil” by Behruz Afkhami, “The Hidden Sense” by Mostafa Razzaq-Karimi, and “Aal” by Bahram Bahramian.

    RM/YAW

    END

    via Iranian cinema discussed at Istanbul meeting – Tehran Times.

  • Iran ready to equip Lebanese army: envoy

    Iran ready to equip Lebanese army: envoy

    TEHRAN - Iran's Ambassador to Lebanon Ghazanfar Roknabadi said 
    Monday Tehran is ready to equip the Lebanese army and expand 
    bilateral defense cooperation without setting any preconditions, 
    the English language satellite Press TV reported.
    Speaking at a meeting with Lebanese Defense Minister Fayez Ghusn in 
    Beirut, Roknabadi said that developing stronger defense cooperation 
    between the two countries is necessary given the daily violations of 
    Lebanese airspace by the Israeli fighter jets, said the report.
    Ghusn, for his part, praised Iran's support for Lebanon and said 
    Lebanon is proud of having Iran's support, according to Press TV.
    Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi has reiterated 
    that the Islamic Republic is ready to supply Lebanon army with arms.
    Iran is fully prepared to provide Lebanese army with cutting- edge 
    military equipment if it receives any request from Lebanon for 
    equipping its army, Vahidi said.
    www.chinadaily.com.cn, 11.10.2011
  • Arab Spring Sees Turkish-Iranian Rivalry Take a New Turn

    Arab Spring Sees Turkish-Iranian Rivalry Take a New Turn

    Arab Spring Sees Turkish-Iranian Rivalry Take a New Turn

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 8 Issue: 186

    October 11, 2011

    By: Saban Kardas

    Turkey’s decision to host a NATO early warning radar in the US-led missile defense program continues to reverberate, especially for its relations with Iran. High ranking Iranian officials repeatedly criticize not only Turkey’s cooperation with the United States on the missile shield, but also Ankara’s recent foreign policy initiatives. These include the Turkish government’s efforts to set a model for the transformation of the regional countries in the wake of the Arab Spring, Ankara advocating a two-state solution for the Palestinian problem, or its increasingly assertive position on Syria.

    The decision on radar deployment apparently was a tipping point for Iranian officials, who now vocally criticize Turkey on a myriad of issues (EDM, September 20). Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said during a live TV interview that Iranian officials told their Turkish counterparts it was wrong to grant such permission and it would not benefit Turkey , October 5). Major-General Yahya Rahim-Safavi, the military advisor to the Iranian supreme religious leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, also maintained that Turkey had recently committed various strategic mistakes and would pay a heavy price if it failed to change course (Hurriyet, October 9). The Deputy Head of Iran’s Armed Forces’ Joint Chiefs of Staff Brigadier-General Massoud Jazayeri joined the wave of protest and urged Turkey to rethink its long-term strategic interests and side with Muslim nations instead of the West (www.presstv.ir, October 10).

    Iranian officials criticize Turkey on a range of issues of substantial importance. First, Iranian leaders increasingly label the missile shield as a project that is designed to boost Israel’s security against a counter-attack from Iran in case Israel strikes Iran’s nuclear facilities. However, considering that Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan repeatedly rebuff such claims, which were also raised by Turkish opposition parties, it appears that the Iranian campaign is driven by a concern to discredit Turkey in the eyes of regional countries.

    In order to contextualize Iran’s accusations against Turkey, it might be useful to recall Erdogan’s recent criticism of Israel’s nuclear program. As late as last week, Erdogan continued his recent criticism of Israel, going as far as arguing that he saw Israel as a threat to the region and surrounding countries, because it possessed the atomic bomb. Moreover, Erdogan raised a related criticism, when he pointed to the double standards of world powers: while Iran came under international scrutiny because of its nuclear program, there had been a lack of comparable debate on Israel’s nuclear weapons (Anadolu Ajansi, October 5). Iranian officials’ lambasting of Turkey through manipulative accounts, despite Erdogan’s staunch position on Israel at the expense of harming relations with the West, reveals their intent and approach toward Turkey.

    Iranian officials have recently expressed differences of opinion on the Palestine issue. Erdogan’s stance on Israel’s treatment of Palestinians has not necessarily contributed to forging common ground with Iran. Erdogan devoted a large portion of his address at the UN General Assembly last month to the rights of the Palestinians, supporting their bid for recognition. While Turkey has invested a great deal of political capital advocating a two-state solution in international venues, Khamenei, in a recent address at an international conference on the Palestinian Intifada, labeled this formula as tantamount to capitulation to the demands of “Zionists.” Rejecting the Palestinians’ bid for statehood at the UN, Khamenei argued that any solution based on the recognition of Israel’s right of existence would threaten the stability and security of the Middle East. Describing Iran as the greatest defender of the Palestinians, Khamenei criticized other regional powers that maintain close relations with Washington , October 1).

    Moreover, Turkish-Iranian divergence exists in an undeclared rivalry for regional leadership over the Arab Spring. For some time this rivalry was only evident in the realm of speculation by analysts. While Iran has been working to put its imprint on the regional transformation, by labeling the popular uprisings as an “Islamic awakening,” Turkish government sources or analysts close to the government have highlighted how Turkey’s democratic and capitalist model inspired the Arab revolutions. Perhaps in the first ever direct affirmation of this rivalry, Rahim-Safavi criticized Erdogan’s recent visit to the region. In Cairo, Erdogan stressed a secular-democratic form of government, which seems to have angered the Iranian leadership, sparking their more direct confrontation with Turkey.

    A related area of tension is over competing positions on the Syrian uprising. Faced with the continuation of the Baath regime’s violent campaign to suppress the popular uprising, Turkey has progressively downgraded its ties with Damascus, as well as providing shelter to the Syrian opposition. Turkey’s imposition of sanctions might also negatively affect Damascus’s direct ties to Tehran. Iran, viewing the maintenance of the current regime in Syria as vital to its penetration to Lebanon and Palestine, has grown anxious over Turkey’s policy on Syria, again reflected in Rahim-Safavi’s reactions.

    Some common themes are emerging in Iranian views on Turkey. First, there is a continuous and sustained reaction to Turkey, and it is worth noting that the mounting criticism of the country came from the religious leadership and the Revolutionary Guards. Second, Iranian officials work hard to present Ankara’s recent foreign policy initiatives as simply following the dictates of the US, in order to sustain their oft-repeated argument that they are the only genuine independent power in the region.

    Finally, there is a deliberate attempt to discipline Turkey by sending harsh messages as to how the country should behave. It is unclear whether this rhetoric reflects self-confidence on the part of the Iranian leadership or anxiety over Turkey taking an anti-Iranian position and siding with the US, which might lead to Iran’s isolation in the region. The Iranian side appears ready to exploit economic ties if necessary, in an effort to discipline Turkey. They daringly refer to Turkey’s gas purchase contracts with Iran as well as Ankara’s plans to boost the bilateral trade volume to $20 billion, going as far as sending veiled threats that Ankara might suffer if it fails to reverse its current position and accommodate Iranian concerns.

    https://jamestown.org/program/arab-spring-sees-turkish-iranian-rivalry-take-a-new-turn/