Category: Iran

  • Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 9 Issue: 6
    January 10, 2012
    By: Saban Kardas
    Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, paid a crucial visit to Tehran on January 6, amidst the increasing confrontation between Iran and the West. The visit mainly provided an opportunity to address bilateral issues, as it followed a heated debate in recent months which questions whether Turkey and Iran were involved in an undeclared rivalry in the Arab Spring. The two countries’ diverging positions on Syria, Turkey’s decision to host NATO’s early warning radar, as well as differences on the Palestinians’ quest for recognition, arguably pitted the two against each other. The confrontational mood was further worsened by harsh statements against Turkey by Iranian politicians and high-ranking officials (EDM, October 11, 2011).

    As such statements even led to direct threats voiced by some Iranian lawmakers and military officers, indicating that Iran might take military action against NATO facilities in Turkey, Davutoglu was prompted to convey his uneasiness and demand an explanation. Iranian Foreign Minister, Ali Akbar Salehi, visited Ankara in an effort to allay Ankara’s growing concerns. Reiterating the two countries’ friendship, Salehi sought to assure his Turkish counterpart that such remarks reflected personal opinions and did not represent official Iranian policy on Turkey (Anadolu Ajansi, December 14, 2011).

    Ankara also downplayed such threatening remarks as personal opinions, in an effort to maintain channels for dialogue with Tehran. Though not hiding the differences of opinion on regional issues, Davutoglu and other Turkish officials prefer to focus on issues of converging views and continue to view Tehran as a major stakeholder in the region whose cooperation is essential. More importantly, Davutoglu is keen to reassure his Iranian counterparts that Turkey will not take part in any direct military action against Iran, which seems as a calculated move to comfort Tehran and convince it to steer away from the path of escalation.

    With such considerations in mind, Davutoglu paid a working visit to Iran on January 6, to meet Salehi and other Iranian officials. Davutoglu worked hard to stress the defensive nature of the ballistic missile shield and reiterated that Turkey would not let its territory be used in any attack against Iran. The two ministers also agreed to continue to discuss regional issues, and meet at least twice each year (Anadolu Ajansi, January 5).

    Beyond the immediate Turkish-Iranian frictions, Davutoglu addressed a number of regional issues with Iran. Foregoing the speculations of rivalry, Davutoglu invited his Iranian counterparts to work together in order to address the escalating tensions in the region, which some claim could lead to Sunni-Shiite sectarian divisions. In the last two days, because the uprising in Syria, the ongoing political crisis in Iraq, and the situation in Bahrain involve some sectarian elements, Davutoglu increasingly refers to an imminent danger of sectarian conflict and warns against a new Cold War in the Middle East (Dogan, January 8).

    Moreover, the uncertain future of the dispute over the Iranian nuclear program, especially in view of US sanctions policy and the Iranian brinkmanship in the Strait of Hormuz is a growing concern for Turkey. Ankara recognizes Iran’s right to develop peaceful nuclear technology, but also invites the country to be more transparent about its ongoing program and allay concerns on the part of Western powers.

    Since the talks held between Iran and the P5+1 in Istanbul one year ago, diplomatic channels were largely closed. In order to push things forward on that front, Davutoglu seems to have attempted shuttle diplomacy. In the wake of his Tehran trip, he announced that he was in touch with Catherine Ashton, the EU’s foreign policy chief, on this issue. Davutoglu raised expectations by maintaining that both parties were ready to resume nuclear talks in Turkey. Earlier, Salehi also expressed his readiness to return to nuclear talks in a suitable time and venue agreed upon by the parties, adding that Turkey would be the best option (Anadolu Ajansi, January 8). Commenting on this development, US State Department spokesperson, Victoria Nuland, said that the US remained in consultation with Turkey over Davutoglu’s trip and agrees with Turkey’s goal of bringing Iran back to the negotiating table and complying with its international obligations, though they might differ on tactics. She also emphasized Washington’s readiness to resume discussions, though adding that Iran has yet to formally convey its decision to start the talks (Today’s Zaman, January 7).

    Adding urgency to the matter, the United States and its European allies are initiating a new wave of sanctions to pressure Iran on the economic front. The sanctions recently approved by President Barack Obama involve penalizing the financial institutions doing business with Iran as well as halting oil imports from Iran, by targeting its Central Bank. Turkey abides by the sanctions regime introduced by the UN Security Council in the summer of 2010, but refuses to implement the unilateral Western sanctions on the grounds that they are non-binding. However, there has been growing US expectation for Turkey to join the new sanctions, while Ankara seeks an exemption, given its oil and gas imports from Iran, requiring it to work with Iranian financial institutions.

    A visit by a US delegation led by Deputy Secretary of State, William Burns, to Ankara on January 9, offered an opportunity to discuss these issues. During his talks with Turkish officials, the US delegation, among others, solicited Turkey’s support for unilateral sanctions. Prior to the meeting, some senior US Congressmen and diplomats visited Turkish government officials and bureaucrats, underscoring the importance attached to this issue (Haberturk, January 9).

    Commenting on the visit, Nuland dismissed the argument that Turkey opposes US policy on Iran. She emphasized that the US acknowledges Turkey’s sensitivities given Ankara’s trade ties, but the two sides will continue their dialogue on how to maximize the pressures on Iran to force it to comply with its international obligations (Haberturk, January 10). Turkish sources also reported that Ankara does not want to see a further escalation of the already heightened tensions in the region (Sabah, January 10).

    Uneasy at the growing escalation, Ankara seeks to dampen tensions through a reassertion of its facilitator role and engaging the parties, without taking any side. Once again, Turkey is walking a diplomatic tightrope due to its difficult neighbor’s relations with the West.

    https://jamestown.org/program/turkey-wants-to-resume-talks-on-iranian-nuclear-program/
  • Will Turkey stand against the West ? It refuses to join the sanctions against Iran

    Will Turkey stand against the West ? It refuses to join the sanctions against Iran

    Turkey refused to joint the sanctions against Iran which are offered by the USA and the Western European countries.

    flAccording to Interfax news agency the USA tries to involve Turkey in actions against Iran. Turkey was pressed also in frame of the NATO. According to the source Turkish participation in the anti-Iranian actions is rated highly as Turkey has close economical relations with Iran.

    Events around Iran are developing too fast especially during the last time. On January 9 Iranian side announced that Iranian Fordow factory started the enrichment of uranium.

    IAEA confirmed that all nuclear materials are under its supervision.

    After the announcement by IAEA the USA again called on Iran to stop the enrichment of uranium and to fulfill the resolution by the UN Security Council.

    The USA and the European countries call on Iran to stop the own nuclear program. Official Tehran has announced for many times that its nuclear program is peaceful and is just for the energy claims of the country.

    Relations between Iran and the Western countries are too strained and nuclear program is one of the main themes for it. USA and European countries sometimes hold sanctions against Iranian officials. Economical sanctions are also held. The last scandal took place over Strait of Homruz. Iranian side warned it would close Homruz if embargo is put on Iranian oil to the European countries. The USA announced that Homruz is a border which is not worthy to pass.

    Remind that Turkish-Iranian relations became strained when Turkey let NATO radars to be situated in its territory. Iranian side announced that this actions was directed against Iran for sure.

    via Will Turkey stand against the West ? It refuses to join the sanctions against Iran.

  • Will Turkey Demand an Apology From Iran?

    Will Turkey Demand an Apology From Iran?

    Michael Rubin | @mrubin1971 01.09.2012 – 11:45 AM

    Iranian border guards reportedly shot two Turks crossing illegally into Iran from Turkey. Perhaps this can be the moment of truth for Turkey and its prime minister. When Israeli forces warned and then fired on Turks attempting to run Israel’s lawful blockade of Gaza, Turkish authorities demanded apologies, compensation, and a complete end to the blockade of Hamas’ administration in Gaza. Yet when Iranians kill Turks without warning, Turkey’s response is silence. Perhaps Turkey’s problem isn’t the protection of its citizens after all.

    via Will Turkey Demand an Apology From Iran? « Commentary Magazine.

  • India Said to Be Told Turkey May Stop Routing Iran Oil Payments

    India Said to Be Told Turkey May Stop Routing Iran Oil Payments

    India Said to Be Told Turkey May Stop Routing Iran Oil Payments

    January 09, 2012, 8:08 PM EST

    By Pratish Narayanan and Anto Antony

    Jan. 10 (Bloomberg) — Turkiye Halk Bankasi AS has told Indian oil refiners it may no longer be able to act as an intermediary for their purchases of Iranian crude, four people with knowledge of the matter said.

    Executives from the crude-processing companies met with Indian oil ministry officials yesterday to discuss alternatives, including routing remittances through Russia, the people said, declining to be identified because the information is confidential. Other options that were considered included stopping purchases from Iran altogether and importing from other countries, they said. Indian officials are scheduled to visit Tehran for trade talks Jan. 16-21, two of the people said.

    Indian buyers such as Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. have faced difficulties finding lenders willing to handle payments to Iran because of sanctions against banks in the Gulf state. Saudi Arabia will increase crude exports to some Indian refiners this year as they seek to diversify supplies, four people with knowledge of the plans said Nov. 15. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh discussed alternative financial conduits with Russian officials during his visit to Moscow in December.

    The European Union will discuss imposing harsher sanctions on Iran, including a ban on crude imports, in response to the country’s nuclear program when the bloc’s foreign ministers meet on Jan. 30. Iranian Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi said Dec. 27 that his nation would block fuel shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a transit point for a fifth of the world’s oil, if penalties are imposed, according to a report by the Islamic Republic News Agency.

    Russia’s Gazprombank

    India, which got 11 percent of its crude imports from Iran last year, is exploring the option of making payments for Iranian crude through Russia’s Gazprombank OJSC, though no deal has been reached, three of the people said yesterday. OAO Gazprom, the world’s biggest natural gas producer, owns about 42 percent of Gazprombank, according to the lender’s website.

    Andrei Serov, a Moscow-based spokesman at Gazprombank, wasn’t available for a comment at his office because of a holiday in Russia.

    Bharat Petroleum Corp., or BPCL as India’s second-largest state refiner is known, planned to pay Iran for crude purchases by using the accounts of other government-run processors at Halk Bank, three people with knowledge of the situation said Dec. 21. That plan has now been rejected by the Turkish lender after BPCL made some payments, three of the people said yesterday.

    Nobody answered a phone message left by Bloomberg News yesterday at Halk Bank’s office in Ankara.

    Stop Supplies

    BPCL, which started buying about 20,000 barrels a day of Iranian crude through a term contract in September, is considering whether to stop taking supplies, they said.

    Indian refiners’ debts to Iran for purchases rose to as much as $5 billion in July, the Islamic Republic News Agency cited Central Bank Governor Mahmoud Bahmani as saying. The outstanding payments threatened to jeopardize about $9.5 billion in annual trade between the nations, with Iran telling customers they wouldn’t receive August shipments unless the bills were paid, according to the Fars news agency. The refiners started clearing the outstanding payments in August after Halk Bank agreed to make transfers.

    U.S. President Barack Obama on Dec. 31 signed into law measures that deny access to the U.S. financial system to any foreign bank that conducts business with the central bank of Iran. The law includes language that allows the president to waive the sanctions if he determines they would threaten national security.

    –With assistance from Steve Bryant in Ankara and Eduard Gismatullin in London, Editors: Raj Rajendran, Rachel Graham.

    To contact the reporters on this story: Pratish Narayanan in Mumbai at [email protected]; Anto Antony in New Delhi at [email protected]

    To contact the editors responsible for this story: Alexander Kwiatkowski at [email protected]; Chitra Somayaji at [email protected]

    via India Said to Be Told Turkey May Stop Routing Iran Oil Payments – Businessweek.

  • Turkey Resists US Sanctions Against Iran Despite US Envoy Visit

    Turkey Resists US Sanctions Against Iran Despite US Envoy Visit

    Turkey Resists US Sanctions Against Iran Despite US Envoy Visit

    Dorian Jones | Istanbul, Turkey

    Photo: AP  Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu (R) and US Deputy Secretary of State William Burns speak after the Istanbul Conference for Afghanistan in Istanbul, Turkey, November 2011. (file photo)
    Photo: AP Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu (R) and US Deputy Secretary of State William Burns speak after the Istanbul Conference for Afghanistan in Istanbul, Turkey, November 2011. (file photo)

    U.S. Deputy Secretary of State William Burns is visiting close ally Turkey to further press international sanctions against Iran over its controversial nuclear energy program. However, Ankara remains opposed to the new U.S.-led measures.

    Although Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has ruled out enforcing new U.S.-led sanctions against Iran, American envoy William Burns is in Ankara trying to change Turkey’s mind. Turkey enforces United Nations measures against Iran, but refuses to join other sanctions pushed by the U.S. and the European Union.

    Semih Idiz, who writes for the Turkish newspaper Milliyet, said Burns is the latest in a string of high-level American officials to visit Turkey.

    “Turkey has made it clear it’s against sanctions on Iran. So now we see Washington actively lobbying Turkey at the highest level. This adds pressure on Turkey, of course. But it doesn’t resolve Turkey’s dilemma of having to tread a cautious line between these two sides,” said Idiz.

    Turkey claims Iranians will face undue economic hardship if it complies with additional U.S. sanctions that target Iran’s energy sector.

    But Turkish companies also are profiting from Ankara’s resistance, said Turkey-Iran expert Mehrdad Emadi.

    “This importance has gained momentum in the last 16 months, where some of the trade from the United Arab Emirates has been diverted to Turkey because the United Arab Emirates has come under pressure from European Union and American authorities,” said Emadi.

    Turkish banks are benefiting, as well. They transfer as much as a billion dollars a month to Tehran. The Turkish state-controlled Halkbank is facilitating payment for Iran’s oil exports, in particular from India. The bank, having no offices in the United States, is largely immune to any U.S. punishment for violating Washington’s sanctions.

    International relations expert Sol Ozel of Kadir Has University said Turkey is siding with its banks.

    “There has been a lot of pressure by American treasury on Turkey to stop that. But Halkbank is a state bank. Therefore, obviously Turkey is resisting to cooperate, which suggests Turkey wishes to continue to play this dual game of aligning itself increasingly with United States,” said Ozel.

    Despite the divide over economics and trade, Turkish and U.S. policies across the region are increasingly converging. Ankara last year agreed to participate in a NATO missile defense system aimed at Iran. The move was widely seen as an important sign of Ankara’s allegiance to its Western allies and against its Iranian neighbor.

    Turkish diplomatic correspondent Idiz said neither the U.S. nor Turkey has an interest in a falling-out over Iran sanctions.

    “The American side I don’t think will want to go [into] any kind of confrontation mode with Turkey at such a delicate moment in the region when it’s just pulled out of Iraq and the situation with Iran is escalating and the situation in Syria is ongoing. So I think there will be some balancing of interests and arriving at certain understanding. They are more in need of each other than squabbling over these issues,” said Idiz.

    Ankara is pressing for a diplomatic solution to Iran’s nuclear program. Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoglu said after visiting Tehran last week that Turkey could host an international gathering to resolve the crisis.

    Observers say there is little optimism, though, for a breakthrough. That means pressure for further international sanctions on Iran from Turkey’s Western allies is likely to continue, along with pressure on Ankara to enforce them.

    via Turkey Resists US Sanctions Against Iran Despite US Envoy Visit | Europe | English.

  • Turkey, Israel, Iran—Winners and Losers from Arab Spring

    News Analysis

    By Gary Feuerberg
    Epoch Times Staff Created: January 8, 2012 Last Updated: January 9, 2012
    Related articles: World » Middle East

    An Egyptian demonstrator waves Egyptian and Palestinian flags at Cairo’s Tahrir Square on May 13, 2011. There is strong pro-Palestinian sentiment among the Arab populace, which will make it harder for post-Arab Spring leaders to advocate peace with Israel. (Khaled Desouki /AFP/Getty Images)

    WASHINGTON—Arab Spring upheavals have not only affected the balance of power in countries where they have occurred, they have also had a strong ripple effect, shaking up the strategic outlook of the region’s dominant countries: Israel, Turkey, and Iran.

    Superficially, the Arab upheavals—with dictators being overthrown and popular cries for democracy—may look desirable to the liberal democratic governments of Israel and Turkey, and a blight for Iran—but a closer look reveals that the regional winners and losers may not be so obvious.

    Israel

    For Israel, the Arab awakenings has created a “dramatic transformation” in the structure of the Middle East peace process, said Robert Malley, program director for Middle East and North Africa at the International Crisis Group (ICG), and a former special assistant to President Bill Clinton for Arab-Israeli Affairs (1998–2001).

    Malley spoke at a Middle East Policy Council (MEPC) sponsored conference on Capitol Hill on Jan. 5 titled, Israel, Turkey & Iran in the Changing Arab World.

    Malley said, the Palestinian cause weighs more heavily now due to popular sentiments in the Arab world that Arab leaders ignore at their peril.

    Israel’s strategic outlook has historically been one of “pre-empting threats,” said Malley, which has required having a good sense of what the threats are. That approach, however, is harder to apply after the Arab upheavals when the unpredictable and uncertainty of the masses enters the equation. It’s impossible to know what the threat will be in a year’s time, he said.

    “It’s one thing for Egypt to develop a certain strategic posture when you have President Mubarak or Gen. Tantawi in power. It’s very different if you have the Muslim Brotherhood,” said Malley.

    Israel also has to deal with the reality that public opinion in the Arab countries has a greater role to play than it did before. The question of Palestine resonates more deeply today, Malley said. Any Arab political leader now will not enhance his popularity by reaching out to Israel or by advocating peace with Israel, he said.

    The “peace process” between Israel and Palestinians will have to be “reinvented,” he said. The days of strong moderate Arab leaders and a strong U.S. role are called into question, said Malley.

    Karim Sadjadpour, at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei is increasingly centralizing his control of the country while President Ahmadinejad has been in a power struggle with him. Listening is professor Omer Taspinar, at Brookings, who spoke in what sense Turkey can be a model country for the Middle East. Both gentlemen spoke at the Middle East Policy Council’s Capitol Hill Conference, Jan. 5, 2012. (Gary Feuerberg/ Epoch Times)

    “Who are the Arab leaders that are going to stand with [Palestinian President Mahmud] Abbas in the event of a peace treaty?” Malley asked rhetorically.

    Malley said that he sees Israel adopting a “hunker down mentality,” waiting and acting very cautiously. Changes in the Arab countries are viewed in Israel as bad news with the exception of Syria. If Israel does anything bold, it would be against Iran and its nuclear program, he said.

    Iran

    In recent years, Iran has moved in a different direction from Egypt and other Middle East countries, beginning with its repression of democratic sentiments in 2009. In Iran, “power and influence are increasingly driven by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei,” says Karim Sadjadpour, who in the past has interviewed dozens of senior Iranian officials and hundreds of Iranian intellectuals, clerics, among others for ICG.

    The real power behind Iran’s nuclear program and Iran’s role in the Middle East is decided by Khamenei and the sector of Revolutionary Guards with access to him. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is no longer content to sit on the sidelines, and a power battle has ensued between him and the supreme leader, said Sadjadpour at the MEPC conference.

    While suppressing democracy at home, Iran in the past has welcomed the representative government movement in the Middle East, as it has served Iran’s own interests well. Elections in Lebanon led to Hezbollah; in Palestine, Hamas won; and in Iraq, Shi’ite interests became dominate. So, Iran assumes, “The average citizen has much more in common with Tehran’s world view than the West view,” said Sadjadpour.

    Robert Malley says the political upheavals in the Arab world have introduced more uncertainty and unpredictability resulting in a more cautious Israel. Dr. Malley is director at the International Crisis Group. Prior to joining ICG, Dr. Malley served as special assistant to President Clinton for Arab-Israeli Affairs. He spoke at the Middle East Policy Council’s Capitol Hill Conference, Jan. 5, 2012 (Gary Feuerberg/ Epoch Times)

    But the actual result has been mixed. Sadjadpour said Iran did not anticipate the Syria uprising. Syria is Iran’s “only consistent ally,” he said. “The loss of the al-Assad regime would be a tremendous blow to Tehran.”

    There are already reports that Iran has threatened to withhold funding if Hamas relocates its headquarters from Damascus to Doha, Qatar, revealed Sadjadpour.

    Iran’s patronage of Lebanon-based Hezbollah—“the crown jewel of the Iranian revolution”—is going to be very difficult to sustain in the same way, he said. Hezbollah was created with financial backing from Iran in the early 1980s after Israel invaded Lebanon.

    Turkey

    Turkey is often touted as a role model for the Middle East, and one could argue that Turkey was the big winner of the Arab Spring. It is simultaneously modern, Islamic, and democratic. No one has done that before, says Sadjadpour. It owes its current form to the Islamist-based Justice and Development Party (AKP), which was victorious in the election of 2002.

    Despite the Islamic origins of the AKP, Turkey’s government is secular. When Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan visited Egypt in recent months and argued that Egypt should be a secular country, the position “shocked the Muslim Brotherhood,” said professor Omer Taspinar, speaking at the MEPC conference. Taspinar teaches at the U.S. National War College, and is director of the Turkey Project at the Brookings Institution.

    According to Malley, the main reason for Turkey’s ascension in the region is that it “speaks loudly for the Palestine cause,” which is popular among the Arab masses. For example, Erdogan gained popularity points when he walked out of a conference in Davos, Switzerland, in 2009 to protest Israeli President Shimon Peres’s speech defending Israel’s Gaza offensive.

    Although Turkey is a member of NATO, and until the Gaza flotilla fallout had military ties with Israel, in the past it has also tried to maintain good relations with its neighbors Iran and Syria. Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu proclaimed the “zero problem with neighbors” policy, which aimed to establish a zone of peace and tranquility between neighbors.

    Its nonaligned policy led Turkey, joined by Brazil, to vote against new sanctions on Iran in June 2010. Taspinar says that Turkey does not want to give the impression it is following Western foreign policy. Rather, it states that it wants “regional solutions to regional problems,” said Taspinar.

    However, the sudden breakdown in Turkey’s relations with Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Israel has forced Turkey to abandon the “no problems” doctrine, said Taspinar. Turkey’s relationship with Iran soured when Turkey, agreed last year to host radars as part of NATO’s missile defense.

    Taspinar said one positive remainder of the Turkish approach is its avoidance of the Sunni-Shi’ite divide. Turkey as a secular state disagrees with Saudi Arabia and Iran’s sectarian agendas, and is a voice for peace on this divide that is playing out violently in Iraq and Syria.

    All three speakers agreed that post-Mubarak Egypt will recover its top leadership role in the Arab world. Even in its current chaotic state, Egypt has had more influence than Turkey on the Palestinian question. Egypt brokered the prisoner exchange involving Israeli captive Gilad Shalit, after Turkey had tried. The reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah was hammered out in Cairo, although Turkey had tried very hard, Taspinar said.