Category: Iran

  • Russia backs Iran nuke talks to be held in Turkey

    Russia backs Iran nuke talks to be held in Turkey

    (AA)

    Russia backs Iran nuke talks to be held in Turkey

    davut lavrov

    Davutoglu said that Turkey’s position with Russia was very similar in Iran issue, adding that talks on Iran’s nuclear program should resume rapidly.

    Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said that Turkey had never consented targeting neighboring countries like Russia, Iran or Syria within NATO.

    Holding a joint press conference with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Wednesday, Davutoglu said that Turkey did not launch an initiative to intervene in Iranian issue, adding that Turkey never consented targeting a neighboring country in NATO-related activities.

    Iran-Turkey border has always been a border of peace, and it will continue to be so, he added.

    Noting that he discussed Iran and Syria issues with Lavrov, Davutoglu said that violence towards civilians should rapidly end in Syria, while implementations of reforms should begin.

    Davutoglu said that Turkey’s position with Russia was very similar in Iran issue, adding that talks on Iran’s nuclear program should resume rapidly. He added that Turkey was ready to host the talks, if Iran returned to negotiation table.

    Replying to a question on Syria, Lavrov said Russia wanted bloodshed to end there, stating that they were in favor of a peaceful solution to Syrian crisis through political means.

    Lavrov said they were against an external military intervention in Syria. Russia would keep seeking a solution in Syria with its foreign partners and all parties in Syria, he said.

    Responding another question, Lavrov said they were open to all offers for end of bloodshed in Syria. Russia would not allow unilateral sanctions on Syria, because decisions on these sanctions were made without consulting Russia, China or other countries, he said. Lavrov also said that resolution of Security Council should not be regarded as a permission for external intervention.

    Russia and Turkey had almost same position on Iran and Russia wanted this issue to be solved through diplomatic means, he said. Russia was in favor of (nuclear) talks to be held in Turkey, he said.

    via Russia backs Iran nuke talks to be held in Turkey | Diplomacy | World Bulletin.

  • Reluctant Turkey ‘will join oil embargo’ on Iran

    Reluctant Turkey ‘will join oil embargo’ on Iran

    Thomas Seibert

    Jan 24, 2012

    fo24ja TurkeyIran

    A bazaar in Tehran is laden with fruit, but as the western sanctions bite Iran may find international trade increasingly difficult.

    ISTANBUL // Turkey yesterday criticised the decision by the European Union to impose an import ban on Iranian oil, but Ankara is unlikely to risk irritating western partners over the issue, analysts said.

    “This will raise political tensions” in the region, Ibrahim Kalin, a foreign policy adviser to Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s prime minister, said in a television interview. “Channels for negotiations have to remain open,” Mr Kalin told AHaber.

    Mr Kalin called for new negotiations about Iran’s nuclear programme, which the EU and the US have said may have military purposes, a charge the Iranians deny. “The door is open,” Mr Kalin said about the readiness of Turkey, the only Muslim Nato member country, to host new talks between the West and Iran in Istanbul. The last effort ended without agreement.

    Turkey has been arguing that, as a direct neighbour of Iran and important buyer of Iranian oil, it has a special interest in calming tensions in a region.

    “Decreasing the tension in the region is also to Turkey’s benefit,” a Turkish official said. “That’s why we encourage everybody to find a diplomatic solution to the issue.”

    Ankara said it will not take part in possible military strikes against Iranian nuclear sites that are reportedly being planned by Israel, a former partner of Turkey.

    The Istanbul-based Cumhuriyet newspaper reported yesterday that the Turkish military was drawing up plans to prevent Israeli fighter planes from crossing Turkish airspace if there are bombing missions to Iran. There was no official comment from the defence ministry, but a Turkish diplomat said that “every country, every air force is entitled to monitor and defend its airspace”.

    Taner Yildiz, Turkey’s energy minister, said this month that his country was not obliged to follow sanctions by the EU or the US against Iran. “For us, decisions taken outside the United Nations are not binding,” Mr Yildiz said. Turkish oil imports from Iran would continue.

    As Iran supplies around a third of Turkish oil needs, a reduction of those imports could have dramatic consequences for Turkey’s thriving economy. Last week, Turkey and Iran said they were aiming to raise their bilateral trade to $30 billion (Dh110bn) a year by 2015 – twice the volume of today. Much of today’s trade is oil and gas from Iran to Turkey.

    But days after the pledge to double bilateral trade, news reports said Turkey had begun to explore the possibility to raise oil imports from Saudi Arabia in an effort to lower its dependency on Iran. The Turkish government has not commented on the reports.

    Commentary: Sanctions squeeze Iran, but the street isn’t suffering yet

    Last Updated:Jan 24, 2012

    The goal of US and EU sanctions against Iran’s central bank may be to economically cripple the country, but life on the ground suggests that still seems like wishful thinking.

    Jason Rezaian

    “Turkey says decisions by the US and the EU are not binding for itself, but ultimately Turkey will not side with Iran when it comes down to hard decisions,” Mehmet Sahin, a Middle East specialist at Ankara’s Gazi University, said yesterday.

    Sercan Dogan, an analyst at the Centre for Middle Eastern Strategic Studies (Orsam), an Ankara-based think tank, also argued that Turkey had little choice but to go along with western efforts to increase Iran’s isolation.

    “Turkey will not be able to withstand the US for long in this respect”, Mr Dogan wrote in an analysis for the Orsam webpage last week.

    In 2010, Turkey raised eyebrows among its western partners when it presented a joint agreement with Brazil and Iran aimed at ending the nuclear row. The agreement was swiftly rejected by the EU and the US.

    Since then, Ankara has demonstrated that its Nato membership and western alliances take priority over relations with Iran. Last year, Ankara angered Tehran by giving the green light for the installation of a radar system in Anatolia that forms part of Nato’s anti-missile shield.

    Iran said the system’s real purpose was to protect Israel against counter-strikes after a possible attack on Iranian nuclear sites.

    But Turkey stood by its decision despite sharp criticism from Iran and from parts of the opposition at home.

    Some observers have warned that Iran is trying to use Ankara to buy more time in its stand-off with the West.

    “Iran pushes Turkey in front of the international community whenever the international community puts pressure on it”, Emre Uslu, a columnist, wrote in the English-language Today’s Zaman newspaper last week.

    “During these periods, Iran treats Turkey as if it is its closest ally and uses Turkey both as a fence to hide behind and as a gateway to weakening the international sanctions,” he wrote. A Turkish diplomat, asked for his reaction, dismissed Mr Uslu’s criticism. Trying to de-escalate the situation is in Turkey’s interest, he said.

    via Reluctant Turkey ‘will join oil embargo’ on Iran – The National.

  • Uproar after Jewish American newspaper publisher suggests Israel assassinate Barack Obama

    Uproar after Jewish American newspaper publisher suggests Israel assassinate Barack Obama

    Op-ed in Atlanta Jewish Times says the slaying of the president may be an effective way to thwart Iran’s nuclear program.

    By Chemi Shalev

    NEW YORK – The owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, Andrew Adler, has suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu consider ordering a Mossad hit team to assassinate U.S. President Barack Obama so that his successor will defend Israel against Iran.

    Adler, who has since apologized for his article, listed three options for Israel to counter Iran’s nuclear weapons in an article published in his newspaper last Friday. The first is to launch a pre-emptive strike against Hamas and Hezbollah, the second is to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and the third is to “give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.”

    Obama at Union for Reform Judaism
    U.S. President Barack Obama taking the stage to speak at the 71st General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism. Photo by: Reuters

    Adler goes on to write: “Yes, you read “three correctly.” Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If have thought of this Tom-Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?

    Adler apologized yesterday for the article, saying “I very much regret it; I wish I hadn’t made reference to it at all,” Adler told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. And in an interview with Gawker.com, Adler denied that he was advocating an assassination of Obama.

    Op ed in Atlanta Jewish Times
    The op-ed in Atlanta Jewish Times.

    The American Jewish Committee in Atlanta last night issued a harsh condemnation of Adler’s article, saying that his proposals are “shocking beyond belief.”

    “While we acknowledge Mr. Adler’s apology, we are flabbergasted that he could ever say such a thing in the first place. How could he even conceive of such a twisted idea?” said Dov Wilker, director of AJC Atlanta. “Mr. Adler surely owes immediate apologies to President Obama, as well as to the State of Israel and his readership, the Atlanta Jewish community.”

    Abraham Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, also blasted Adler on Friday, saying “There is absolutely no excuse, no justification, no rationalization for this kind of rhetoric. It doesn’t even belong in fiction. These are irresponsible and extremist words. It is outrageous and beyond the pale. An apology cannot possibly repair the damage. Irresponsible rhetoric metastasizes into more dangerous rhetoric. The ideas expressed in Mr. Adler’s column reflect some of the extremist rhetoric that unfortunately exists — even in some segments of our community — that maliciously labels President Obama as an ‘enemy of the Jewish people.’ Mr. Adler’s lack of judgment as a publisher, editor and columnist raises serious questions as to whether he’s fit to run a newspaper.”
    www.haaretz.com, 21.01.12
  • Iran paid through Turkey for oil sales to India

    Iran paid through Turkey for oil sales to India

    By

    AFP

    Published Saturday, January 21, 2012

    Iran is being paid for oil sales to India through a Turkish bank, the managing director of the National Iranian Oil Company said Friday on Mehr news agency.

    “There is no problem with exports to India and money continues to be transferred through a Turkish bank,” said Mohsen Ghamsari.

    That bank, however, has warned Iranian authorities that it will not take on new clients making money transfers to pay for Iran’s oil exports, Ghamsari was quoted as saying.

    India, which buys about 400,000 barrels per day from Iran, had expressed concern that this channel could no longer be used to make payments.

    Ghamsari said that “part of the money owed to Iran by India was transferred through Turkey” after noting that the Iranian central bank also had “other channels” to receive its oil revenues.

    India announced on Tuesday it would continue buying Iranian oil despite mounting US and EU pressure on the Islamic republic’s clients to limit their purchases as long as Iran pursues its controversial nuclear programme.

    Iran is India’s second-largest oil supplier after Saudi Arabia, providing around 12 percent of the fast-growing country’s needs at an annual cost of around ê12 billion.

    China, another major client, has also rejected Western sanctions on Iran, while Japan and South Korea have expressed reservations over the consequences such sanctions could have on their economies.

    Turkey, which opposes unilateral sanctions against Iran, is also a major client, purchasing gas in addition to oil. Iranian exports to Turkey, mostly from its energy sector, were worth over 12 billion dollars in 2011, according to Iran’s media.

    This week, during a visit by Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi to Turkey, the two countries said they plan to boost annual trade to 30 billion dollars by 2015.

    The West fears Iran is trying to build a nuclear bomb. Tehran insists its nuclear programme is purely for civilian use and refuses to abandon its uranium enrichment activities despite four sets of UN sanctions.

    via Iran paid through Turkey for oil sales to India – Emirates 24/7.

  • DANGEROUS CROSSROADS: NATO launches radar in Turkey to target Russia, Iran and Syria

    DANGEROUS CROSSROADS: NATO launches radar in Turkey to target Russia, Iran and Syria

    Sergei Balmasov, Beijing

    Turkey has recently launched the early warning radar station, a part of NATO’s missile system, which the USA has been building near Russia’s borders. The radar station will be controlled from Germany. The station is located in the town of Malatya, which is 500 kilometers to the south-east of Ankara and some 700 kilometers from the border with Iran. Turkish and US servicemen will serve at the station.

    Turkey agreed to deploy the radar station on its territory in September 2011. Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan stated back then that the deployment of the radar in Turkey would be an important step for the whole region.

    Data from the station will be transferred to command posts in the United States and to the ships equipped with the AEGIS system (a sea-based missile defense system). NATO officials stated that the radar station was deployed in Turkey in connection with the growing threat for Iran to use small and medium range missiles in the Middle East.

    Several local politicians stood up against the deployment of the elements of NATO’s missile defense system in Turkey. They believe that the West would thus get Turkey involved in a possible conflict with Teheran.

    Needless to say, Iran was strongly against the deployment of the missile defense system in Turkey. Iranian officials claimed that such a move could only exacerbate tension in the region. Turkish officials responded with saying that the deployment of the missile defense system elements was not aimed against any other country.

    The deployment of the radar station raised concerns among other countries of the region indeed. The distance from the station to Syria, for example, is a bit more than 200 kilometers. Syrian President Bashar Assad pays a lot of attention to his missile potential. His generals are certain that hundreds of Syrian short-range missiles would guarantee no aggression against Syria. Syrian officials earlier stated that their country would shower Turkey and Israel with missiles in the case of aggression.

    Moreover, many Syrian analysts say that the deployment of the radar station in Turkey proves the preservation of the military alliance between Ankara and Tel Aviv. Israel will also be receiving data from the Turkish radar.

    Russia was not thrilled with the news either. NATO invited Russia to take part in the project, but the talks came to a standstill. Russia also tried to obtain legal guarantees saying that the system would not be aimed against her, but the US refused to do it.

    NATO’s Secretary General Rasmussen set out a hope that an adequate political agreement with Moscow could be achieved before the Russia-NATO summit, which is to take place in Chicago in the spring of the current year. However, chances for that are slim, because Russia will only be able to play the role of a silent observer. NATO can only offer Russia to sit and watch its strength growing.

    Russian President Dmitry Medvedev stated in November 2011 that Russia would take a complex of measures in response to the deployment of the missile defense system in Europe. However, Konstantin Sivkov, the first vice president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, told Pravda.Ru that Russia had practically nothing to respond to the threat from NATO.

    “As for Iskander systems, they can be used against the objects of missile defense in Poland. Iskanders would have to be deployed either in Russia’s Kaliningrad region or in Belarus. However, it will be impossible to hit the targets in Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey. The radius of Iskander complexes is 280 kilometers. In addition, the Americans believe that they will be able to neutralize this virtual threat with the help of ATACMS missile complexes.

    “Russia will not be able to use nuclear weapons in this situation. We have our aviation, but I seriously doubt that Russian combat aviation will be able to win a battle just because of the enemy’s considerable superiority in the air.

    “We can use cruise missiles. However, Russia does not have enough vessels to patrol NATO’s coasts. There are also strategic aircraft that can launch cruise missiles and remain invulnerable to the enemy. However, the Russian arsenal of cruise missiles is not enough either. Our missiles can not be compared to the Tomahawks that can strike targets at distances of up to 2,500 kilometers,” the expert said.

    Sergei Balmasov

    via The 4th Media » DANGEROUS CROSSROADS: NATO launches radar in Turkey to target Russia, Iran and Syria.

  • NATO installs X-band radar in Turkey to monitor Iran missile launches

    NATO installs X-band radar in Turkey to monitor Iran missile launches

    Special to WorldTribune.com

    ANKARA — Turkey has reported the installation of an advanced U.S.-origin radar for NATO’s ballistic missile defense shield.

    Officials said NATO oversaw the installation of the AN/TPY-2 X-band radar at a military facility in the Turkish province of Malatya, about 620 kilometers southeast of Ankara. They said the radar was being operated by both U.S. and Turkish military personnel.

    “The missile defense radar has begun operations,” an official said.

    European Missile Shield Began Activated

    Early warning radar device X-band, AN/TPY-2.

    The Turkish Foreign Ministry has confirmed the installation of the X-band radar, meant to monitor ballistic missile launches in neighboring Iran. The Teheran regime has warned that the BMD platform would be deemed a target in any war between the West and Iran.

    On Jan. 17, the Turkish daily Zaman reported that Turkish intelligence determined an Iranian plot to attack the U.S. embassy and consulates throughout the country in retaliation for the NATO radar. Zaman said the warning of a strike by either Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or the Lebanese-based Hizbullah was relayed to police in all 81 districts and called on authorities to monitor the arrival of foreigners.

    The sources said AN/TPY-2, produced by the U.S. company Raytheon, began operations on Jan. 1, 2012. They said Turkey has imposed strict limitations on the use of data from the radar, including a ban on non-NATO members such as Israel.

    Turkey has demanded U.S. compensation for the deployment of the X-band radar. The sources said Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan has requested U.S. military aid as well as the sale of the Reaper combat unmanned aerial vehicle, a platform long denied by Washington.

    One U.S. Republican presidential candidate, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, said Turkey was moving away from its commitment to NATO. Perry said Ankara was being ruled by “what many would perceive to be Islamic terrorists.”

    “Turkey joined NATO while the governor was still two years old,” the Turkish Foreign Ministry said on Jan. 17. “It is a member that has made important contributions to the trans-Atlantic alliance’s conflict-full history. It is among countries that are at the front lines in the fight against terrorism.”

    via NATO installs X-band radar in Turkey to monitor Iran missile launches | World Tribune.