Category: Iran

  • Turkey Pushes for New Action on Syria

    Turkey Pushes for New Action on Syria

    As Shelling Kills More Than 50 in Homs, Former Damascus Ally Seeks Summit to Press for Leader’s Ouster; Iran Backs Assad

    By JOE PARKINSON, CHARLES LEVINSON and JAY SOLOMON

    WO AI697 SYRIA G 20120208182707
    Associated Press

    A Syrian rebel runs for cover amid fire from unseen pro-Assad forces on Wednesday in Idlib, northern Syria.

    ISTANBUL—As Syrian forces pounded the city of Homs with tank shells and rockets, adding dozens of fatalities to the siege’s five-day toll, Turkey pushed to the lead of countries trying to halt President Bashar al-Assad’s crackdown on his enemies.

    Turkey called for an international summit “as soon as possible” to coordinate Syria policy between Middle East and world powers and press Mr. Assad to step aside. “We won’t leave Syria to its own destiny,” Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said in an interview with Turkey’s NTV television. “We are determined to form a platform for broad international consensus.”

    Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov calls on countries with influence over the Syrian opposition to press them to enter a dialogue with embattled President Bashar al-Assad. (Video: Reuters/Photo: Getty Images)

    ReutersA Syrian living in Jordan protested Tuesday against Russia’s support of the Syrian regime, in front of Russian embassy in Amman.

    The Turkish move comes after Russia and China vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution pressing Mr. Assad to step aside. On Sunday, the day after the veto, the U.S. raised a call for a “friends of democratic Syria” that would ramp up efforts to push Mr. Assad from power.

    Such a coalition could provide a platform outside the U.N. to boost diplomatic pressure on Damascus. The U.N.’s latest stalemate came after efforts by the Arab League of nations also failed to stem Syria’s violence, which began nearly a year ago with harsh government clampdowns on predominantly peaceful protests and has since brought the country to the edge of civil war.

    For Turkey, the moves cement a dramatic reversal during the past year in its alliance with Damascus. They also underline Ankara’s coalescence with Washington on regional policy, following a recent strain that saw Turkey moving closer to Iran and engaging in rhetorical sparring with a top U.S. ally in the region, Israel.

    Turkey and the U.S. are likely to be joined by countries in Europe and the Arab world that have also called for Mr. Assad to step aside. Separately, senior European Union officials said Wednesday the body is considering new sanctions on Syria.

    As international lines against Mr. Assad deepened, one of his allies stood firm. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad pledged Iran’s support following a meeting Wednesday with Syria’s top cleric.

    Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian met with Syria’s foreign minister in Damascus and said afterward that Iran remained “confident that the Syrian leadership and people will be able to overcome the current events,” according to Syria’s state-run Sana news agency.

    Opposition activists in Syria say dozens of civilians have been killed in Homs as the military offensive in the city advances. (Video: Reuters)

    The Turkish bid to form an international platform is reminiscent of the Libya Contact Group, an informal group of countries that met several times, including in Istanbul, to harmonize policy during the uprising against Moammar Gadhafi. Mr. Davutoglu said that in recent days he had laid the groundwork for such a meeting, discussing Syria with his counterparts in Italy and Qatar.

    Any Libya parallels are likely to be greeted coolly by Russia and China, which have characterized international efforts in Libya as cover for forcing regime change. Mr. Davutoglu didn’t say whether Russia and China would take part but said Turkey wanted the group to be “as wide as possible.”

    Russian President Dmitry Medvedev took a flurry of telephone calls from world capitals over the veto, with French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan both conveying on Wednesday that Mr. Assad has lost legitimacy and must step aside, according to their offices.

    Mr. Medvedev countered that foreign interference is “not an option,” the Kremlin said. Mr. Medvedev instead said that a search to end bloodshed in Syria should continue, including at the U.N. Security Council, according to the Kremlin.

    Meanwhile, Syrian forces mounted their fifth consecutive day of attacks on Homs, a city north of Damascus along the Lebanese border, striking with artillery, tank shells, rockets and mortars.

    The city, a melting pot of ethnicities that mirror Syria’s own ethnic and religious diversity, has been the heart of the 11-month uprising. It has also been a base for rebel fighters thanks in part to the smuggling routes from Lebanon through which activists and locals say opposition fighters are obtaining weapons.

    WSJ’s Greg White checks in on Mean Street with the latest on pressure on Russia to help end violence in Syria. Photo: AP.

    Read More

    • In Syria, Russia Extracts No Vows
    • Facing Criticism, China Hints at Syria Action
    • America Exits Syria as Russia Makes Push
    • U.S. Steps Up Pressure to Oust Assad
    • China Defends Veto in Vote on Syria

    Regional Upheaval

    Track events day by day in the region.

    View Interactive

    OB PH067 MidTLp D 20110823122028

    • More photos and interactive graphics

    Amateur videos shot by Homs residents and posted to YouTube by opposition activists showed what were characterized as Wednesday attacks, with shells striking residential buildings and by pillars of smoke rising into the sky. One video appeared to show a resident standing by the corpse of a child, holding a piece of rocket shrapnel that he said had struck the child’s home. “What is the U.N. waiting for?” he said in the video. “Are these animals that are dying?”

    Another showed a column of Syrian army trucks, including tanks and armored vehicles, rolling along an otherwise deserted road. Activists said it was evidence of the Syrian army’s buildup in and around the city.

    The images couldn’t be corroborated but broadly match accounts from residents reached by telephone throughout the week. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a U.K.-based opposition group, said between 53 and 60 people died in Homs on Wednesday. The group and other activists said late Tuesday night members of a pro-Assad militia known as the Shabiha had murdered 20 members of three entire opposition families. Elsewhere in Syria, activists reported an additional 17 people killed by pro-regime forces, while rebels killed four Syrian soldiers in Zabadani, a suburb of the capital Damascus. Another opposition group put the death toll in Zabadani and the nearby town of Madaya at 18 deaths, saying that phone and power had been cut to the towns, which “are facing a humanitarian crisis.”

    The regime has blamed terrorist gangs and criminals for the violence in Homs. The state-controlled Syrian news agency on Wednesday reported that rebel-fired mortars struck a nearby oil refinery in Homs, setting two oil storage tanks ablaze.

    Russia’s foreign minister met with Syrian President Assad and said his message of the need to step up efforts to end the violence in Syria “has been heard.” Jeff Grocott has details on The News Hub. Photo: AP

    Related Video

    Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin says the world faces a growing “cult of violence” and Moscow must not let events like those in Libya and Syria be repeated in Russia. (Video: Reuters/Photo: Getty Images)

    Mr. Davutoglu’s comments came ahead of his departure Wednesday for Washington for previously scheduled bilateral meetings with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

    The senior diplomats are expected to explore ways to more quickly and effectively provide assistance to Syrian refugees who have sought haven in Turkey and other neighboring countries, U.S. officials said. But they will also discuss the tricky question of potentially providing aid to the victims of violence inside Syria.

    The meetings are also expected to focus on Turkey’s ties with the Free Syrian Army, a loosely affiliated network of rebel fighting units and defected army regulars. Ibrahim Kalin, an adviser to Turkey’s Prime Minister, said in a column in pro-government daily Zaman on Wednesday that the “next stage in Syria will be to further empower the opposition.”

    Turkey has quietly raised the idea of establishing a “buffer zone” inside Syria to protect civilians from Mr. Assad’s forces. But to do so, U.S. officials acknowledge, the international community would need to assemble some sort of outside military force to deter Syrian forces. They worry that without such firepower, Syrian forces could easily overwhelm any buffer zones or humanitarian corridors and potentially turn international monitors into hostages.

    Mr. Davutoglu declined to discuss whether the government was considering a military-backed humanitarian intervention to help quell the violence.

    Ankara and Damascus were close regional allies until this summer, when Turkish officials said President Assad’s refusal to end a bloody crackdown against opponents forced a shift. Ankara has repeatedly warned that Syria’s complex ethnic and sectarian mix could disintegrate, plunging the nation into chaos and potentially forcing neighboring nations to intervene.

    Turkey has for months sheltered several thousand Syrian refugees, including members of the rebel Syrian Free Army. The opposition Syrian National Council in December opened an office in Istanbul.

    “Turkey is beyond the point of no return; it has burned its bridges with Damascus and bet heavily on regime change. The failure at the U.N. means Ankara will further strengthen its cooperation with the U.S. on Syria, but they’ll want to avoid that perception by building a coalition,” said Sinan Ulgen, a former Turkish diplomat now with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Turkish analysts say Ankara is a reluctant hard-power player in the region, but the government’s fears of regional sectarian conflict are spurring a more activist policy.

    Just a year ago, Mr. Assad was Exhibit A in Turkey’s “zero-problems-with-neighbors” foreign policy. Trade between the neighbors almost doubled to $2.3 billion in the two years to 2010 after Ankara cut visa requirements and eased tariffs. That policy was replicated across the region, boosting relations and trade with neighboring Muslim regimes, while downgrading ties with former ally Israel.

    The Arab Spring, however, upended that policy as allies such as Libya’s Gadhafi were pushed aside and Shiite-Sunni tensions rose across the region.

    The collapse of that doctrine has dovetailed with what analysts describe as an increasing symmetry of Washington and Ankara’s policies after a period of significant strain in 2009-2010, when Turkey moved closer to Iran and tensions with Israel were at boiling point over the killing of seven Turkish nationals by Israeli commandos on the Gaza-bound Mavi Marmara flotilla.

    Analysts say the partnership has been bolstered in recent months by Turkey’s strong backing of pro-democracy movements during Arab Spring uprisings and its decision to host a NATO missile shield designed to contain Iran. Turkish and U.S. diplomats say they can’t remember a time when cooperation between Ankara and Washington was closer, citing that President Barack Obama called Turkey’s prime minister more than any other leader except Britain’s prime minister in 2011.

    —Ayla Albayrak, Gregory L. White and William Horobin contributed to this article.

    Write to Joe Parkinson at joe.parkinson@dowjones.com, Charles Levinson at charles.levinson@wsj.com and Jay Solomon at jay.solomon@wsj.com

  • Tehran unveils copy of Quran manuscript from Topkapi Museum

    Tehran unveils copy of Quran manuscript from Topkapi Museum

    TEHRAN – A copy of the 11th century manuscript of the Holy Quran kept at the Topkapi Palace Museum in Istanbul was unveiled here in Tehran on Sunday.

    c 330 235 16777215 0 images stories feb02 07 16 rm23The book inscribed by Uthman ibn Husayn al-Warraq in Kufic is the eighth book of the 14-volume series, Mohammad Haeri Emadi, translator of the book into Persian, said at the opening ceremony held at Iran’s Majlis Library, Museum and Documentation Center.

    Majlis speaker Ali Larijani, Director of the Topkapi Museum Ilber Ortayli, and Turkish Ambassador to Tehran Umit Yardim were among the guests at the opening ceremony, the Persian service of MNA reported on Monday.

    Emadi added that all the words bear vowels and Uthman Warraq had inscribed in Kufic to show the significance of Kufic inscription among the Muslims.

    Ilber Ortayli also spoke briefly and said that this is the first time the Topkapi Museum has donated a copy of such a priceless treasure to Iran’s Majlis Library and hoped this will help strengthen cultural relations between both countries.

    Larijani next said that the Holy Quran is the most important entity that can help different Islamic nations relate to one another.

    “Quran is a true light in which we can seek shelter and find its truth,” he added, asking different Islamic nations to be more united under the shadow of the Quran.

    Expert on Quranic texts Hojjatoleslam Mohammad-Ali Mahdavi Raad, also present at the ceremony, said that this copy is a significant one for its text, translation and art.

    RM/YAW

    END

    via Tehran unveils copy of Quran manuscript from Topkapi Museum – Tehran Times.

  • Obama Claims Iran is “Isolated” When the Opposite is True

    Obama Claims Iran is “Isolated” When the Opposite is True

    Obama IranObama claims “a world once divided [on Iran]. . .now stands as one” and that Iran is “isolated”. Is it Iran or the US & Israel who are “isolated”?

    by Joshua Blakeney

    Press TV: US president Barack Obama has asserted the country’s ironclad commitment to Israel’s security; while repeatedly threatening Iran with what he calls ‘all options on the table’.

    Obama once again renewed US threats against Iran during his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on January 24, saying that Washington will maintain pressure on the Islamic Republic over its nuclear program.

    “America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal,” the US president said.

    Iran has categorically refuted the US-led allegations regarding its nuclear program, insisting that the country’s nuclear program is only intended for peaceful civilian purposes.

    Joshua Blakeney, staff writer from Veterans Today; joins Press TV to share his opinions on the issue of the US president’s State of the Union Speech.

    What follows is an approximate transcript of the interview.

    [SOURCE: http://www.presstv.ir/detail/223209.html]

    Press TV: Joshua Blakeney thank you so much for joining us. Let us go directly to the first question which starts with what the US president in the State of the Union address said and is it really a disinformation and that is that, Iran is on the path of acquiring a nuclear weapon?

    Blakeney: Yes, it was a quite myopic speech, coming from the president of the United States. I mean, I found it particularly telling that he made the statement that “the world was once divided and”, thanks to him, “the world is now united on the question of Iran.”

    I am having some feedback, I apologize. But the reality is of course that the Non-Aligned Movement – which is consisted of a 120 nations – issued a statement just eight days ago in which they endorsed Iranian sovereignty and expressed their hostility towards the US encroaching on Iranian sovereignty.

    And therefore that was one utterance from the President of the United States that was evidently false.

    NAM meeting Tehran
    Obama forgot to mention in his State of the Union address that the 120 members of the Non-Aligned-Movement support Iranian sovereignty and denounce US-Israeli hostility towards Iran

    Obviously the insinuation that Iran is trying to acquire nuclear weapons is buttressed by no evidence and of course the IAEA, [International Atomic Energy Agency], any statements they have made in which they have indirectly implied this, has been inferred from evidence, so called, provided to them by itsmember states like the United States and Israel and Britain and therefore their statements are not reliable at all.

    Iran clearly is trying to develop a civilian nuclear program, like France has; like many countries in the world have; which is completely justifiable and indeed legal.

    And so the president of the United States I think reflected not necessarily his own perspective but those of his backers. You know, the United States political system is one where money speaks; in a capitalist system those who own capital have political clout.

    And the statements that Barack Obama made vis-à-vis the Middle East, and really in general to do with domestic economics also, I believe, were the product of his backers.

    And we know who is supporting the Democrat Party financially and what their agenda is in terms of Middle East policy.

    And that in my humble opinion is to promote the interest of the state of Israel, often in fact jeopardizing traditional US-Middle East policy which was to try and do bilateral negotiations within ensconced Middle East regimes. And therefore this speech has to go down as an embarrassment.

    And in fact if you look, if you go to about an hour, into Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address in about an hour into it, you will see that when he mentions Iran and when he mentions his ironclad support for the State of Israel, that actually only about half of the Congress persons clapped which might indicate that there is some discontent with this tendentious policy of the United States towards the State of Israel.

    blakeney presstv1Press TV: Joshua Blakeney, this all options on the table is something again perhaps, maybe because of a reelection year for Obama maybe its a signal and some say for the Israeli lobby at the same time the great length that the United States is going to get sanctions on Iran.

    We know that they have made and introduced the sanctions, trying to get EU [European Union] which they got their approval even though it’s at the behest of Europe in terms of what they are going through regarding the Euro zone crisis, of course going with his co-worker [US Secretary of the Treasury] Timothy Geithner all the way to China and we saw what happened there regarding getting China on board and of course then with India.

    I mean what is it that the US president means with this ‘all options on the table’?

    Blakeney: Well, I think it is largely empty rhetoric from the President of the United States and I think there is a tendency among the political class to think if they repeat something as many times as possible that it would begin to be true.

    And Barrack Obama said in his State of the Union address that the world is now united against Iran and that is patently false, is Venezuela against Iran? Is China against Iran? Is the Non-Aligned Movement of 120 nations against Iran?

    I do not think so, so we are seeing the decline of Anglo-America and this kind of Euro- American imperialist world that the planet has been victim of for the past 500 years really since 1492 and we are living in a multipolar world now, one where Iran has some agency.

    Iran China1
    China and Iran continue to trade with each other irrespective of the sanctions imposed by the U.S. and E.U.

    And if the European Union and the United States wants to work in Israel’s interests and against its own interests of doing commercial dealings with Iran, then Iran will go elsewhere and trade its resources and goods with other nations which I think is a good thing. I think it is good that we are living in a multipolar world.

    One of the intellectuals authors of the “war on terror” was an individual named Charles Krauthammer, who in 1990 authored a paper entitled The Unipolar Moment, in which he said, oh this moment after the Soviet Union has declined US must jumped on it, because it won’t be there for ever.

    And that unipolar moment, you know, metastasized into the invasion of Iraq and the invasion of Afghanistan. But I believe that actually they cannot invade and attack Iran because they are bereft of soldiers for a start; they’re overstretched militarily, the United States, and moreover Iran has a capability to defend itself.
    Press TV: So what is it [the US] trying to do there when it keeps saying it Joshua Blakeney, I mean, some say well it is a distraction from the problems that he [Obama] is facing at home. And I am talking about the Occupy movement, do you agree with that?

    Joshua Blakeney and Mark Glenn critically analyze Barak Obama’s State of the Union speech on Press TV.

    chavez ap story
    Iran is on the right side of history contributing to the success of the Bolivarian Revolution in Latin America. Iran and many nations in Latin America are at the forefront of the resistance to the international imperialism of the US, Britain and Israel

    Blakeney: Yes, to an extent. You know it offers a scapegoat, a smokescreen to distract people. So I do agree to a large extent with what my colleague said.

    You know the fact of the matter is that US politicians need to pander and Kowtow to the Israel lobby in the United States.

    JJ Goldberg did a study in the 1990′s in which he deduced that 45% of Democrat party donations came from individuals who are partisan to the State of Israel.

    And in 2006 Richard Cohen did a study in the Washington Post, in which he indicated 60% of the Democrat Party [money] comes from individuals whose primary allegiance is to the state of Israel.

    So if 60% of the Barack Obama’s money is coming from individuals whose first priority is Israel, is it very surprising that Barack Obama would have this so called ‘ironclad’ consensus with the state of Israel?

    I think that this is historically precedented, if you look in 1965 for example, when the British empire was trying to extend self determination and self rule to the inhabitants of the Rhodesia, the natives of Rhodesia, we saw the local crazed ethnic nationalists form a schism in the British empire and rise up and declare independence likewise the US after the Cold War had no use for Israel anymore.

    The divergence between a rational U.S. Middle East policy and the Israeli Middle East policy of denying Arabs and Muslims cohesion and stability is analogous with the divergence of interests between the declining British Empire and regional Rhodesian white ethnic nationalists in 1965 (as portrayed from 5 mins 52 seconds in the above video). ]

    After 1967 Israel proved itself to be a formidable fighting force and within the context of the Cold War the United States could use Israel to smash up this or that Arab nation or to extend its Middle East policy.

    After the Cold War what use did the US have for Israel or for South Africa? In the case of South Africa, the Afrikaners did not have a lobby in the United States and so the US cast them adrift in the 1980′s and the VETO they provided them in the United Nations dissipated.

    Unfortunately, what would have been logical and rational from the perspective of US hegemony who would obviously want to win over Middle East governments to resist the hegemony of the …..

    Press TV: Joshua Blakeney, the US president said that this is the right time for the United States to be on the right side of the Middle East.

    Is the US on the right side of the Middle East? Quickly [we have] twenty seconds or less.

    Blakeney: No, it is definitely not. In the 1980s the Israeli government formulated a new policy of wanting to destabilize the Middle East which goes against US oil interests, against the US rational interests as a global hegemon.

    www.veteranstoday.com, January 28th, 2012

  • Persian calligraphy shines at Turkish-Iranian competition

    Persian calligraphy shines at Turkish-Iranian competition

    TEHRAN — Iranian calligraphers shined at an Iranian-Turkish joint calligraphy competition held here in Tehran, winning the top cash prizes awarded during a ceremony at the Iranian Artists Forum on Friday.

    c 330 235 16777215 0 http www.tehrantimes.com images stories jan02 29 16 rm08The Hilya International Calligraphy Award was organized by Tehran’s Emruz Gallery and Istanbul’s Antik Sanat Gallery, Tehran Times reported on Saturday.

    Within the Islamic context, Hilya refers to the literary genre which elaborates on the features and merits of Prophet Muhammad (S).

    The award-presentation ceremony took place in the presence of Iranian masters of calligraphy Gholamhossein Amirkhani and Ali Shirazi.

    Shirazi, who is also the curator of the Emruz Gallery, said at the opening ceremony that the award was first held two years ago in Tehran under the title Yasin.

    “These types of awards help highlight the position of Iranian calligraphers in the world. The younger generation forms a trustworthy support for the veterans,” Shirazi added.

    Amirkhani who was also among the jury members proposed that the young calligraphers should respect their art and follow their profession.

    The lofty objective of the Hilya award is to present a modern Iranian form of calligraphy to the world of Islam, he added.

    Later on, the winners selected by the jury Shirazi and Amirkhani as well as Turkish calligraphers Ali Toy and Davut Bektash were honored at the ceremony.

    Javad Khuran from Iran and Ahmad Faris from Egypt were announced as the winners of the special jury award with a cash prize of $35,000 each.

    The winners are expected to be presented with their prize by Turkish President Abdullah Gul during a ceremony in Turkey.

    In the nastaliq section, Iranian Mahmud Rahbaran took home the first cash prize of $20,000. The second prize of $13,000 went to Habib Ramezanpur and the third prize of $13,000 went to Hamid Jafari.

    Peyman Sadatnejad, Meysam Soltani, Mostafa Abedini, Ehsan Ahmadi, and Ali Piran were among the ten top winners.

    The jury also awarded Ramin Merati and Qasem Samadian for their innovation in calligraphy.

    RM/YAW

    END

    via Persian calligraphy shines at Turkish-Iranian competition – Tehran Times.

  • Exclusive: Halkbank to handle Iran payments so long as legal

    Exclusive: Halkbank to handle Iran payments so long as legal

    By Jonathon Burch and Ebru Tuncay

    ANKARA | Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:36am EST

    (Reuters) – Turkish lender Halkbank will continue to handle customers’ oil payments to Iran as long as they comply with international regulations, the bank’s general manager said in the wake of fresh, unilateral U.S. and EU sanctions.

    Halkbank’s dealings with Iran drew attention last year when Indian refiners disclosed they were channeling oil payments through the Turkish bank as their own central bank had shut its payment facility, fearing U.S. retribution.

    Majority state-owned Halkbank is Turkey’s sixth largest bank, based on unconsolidated assets, and has a representative office in Tehran.

    It also processes payments to Iran by Tupras, Turkey’s sole refiner and a unit of Koc Holding, the country’s largest conglomerate, according to energy sector officials.

    General Manager Suleyman Aslan denied there had been U.S. pressure to stop handling transactions, as the bank was not acting illegally. He said a decision to reject an application from another Indian refiner late last year was unrelated to its trade deals with Iran.

    In an interview with Reuters Aslan said “communication channels” with all sides, including the United States, were open and that apart from India, the bank was not handling payments to Iran from any other third country.

    He said decisions on whether to take business were based on banking rather than political criteria.

    “We do not make any specific decision based on Iran or any other country. We have customers, and these customers approach us and we look at their transactions. This transaction may be in India, it may be in Iran it may be in another country,” he said.

    “If it is legitimate business, we will carry out the job within the framework of international regulations and international standard practice.”

    On December 31, President Barack Obama signed into law a fresh set of sanctions targeting financial institutions that deal with Iran’s central bank to stem the flow of oil revenue and persuade Tehran to abandon a suspected nuclear weapons program.

    The European Union followed with a ban on Iranian oil this week that is expected to take full effect within six months.

    Heavily dependent on imports of oil and gas from its eastern neighbor, Muslim NATO member Turkey opposed the imposition of U.N. sanctions on the Islamic Republic in 2010 but says it is abiding by those measures.

    However, Turkish officials have repeatedly said there is no obligation for Turkey to enforce tougher unilateral sanctions subsequently announced by the United States and European Union.

    “If after today processing these transactions brings about problems or becomes unlawful, we will not process them, however, according to the information that we are receiving now, these transactions are not unlawful,” Aslan said.

    “Therefore, if our customers want to continue – they can.”

    India, according to a government official in New Delhi this week, has agreed with Iran to settle part of their annual $12 billion oil trade in rupees.

    And one refiner, Hindustan Petroleum Corp has agreed to double its imports from Saudi Arabia from April, in a move that could replace purchases of Iranian crude.

    “TRANSPARENT”

    Indian state-run refiners began using Halkbank to pay Iran for imported oil in July.

    In December, however, Halkbank, which is 75 percent state-owned, declined to open an account for an additional Indian refiner, Bharat Petroleum Corp BPCL, fuelling speculation the lender may be planning to stop payments to Iran.

    However, Aslan said the decision to refuse BPCL was because it was unable to provide a satisfactory reference to Halkbank and was unrelated to concerns over doing more business with Iran.

    Asked if Halkbank would consider dealing with BPCL in the future, Aslan said even with the necessary reference the bank “may still not” handle payments from the refiner and that “this will depend on the situation at the time.”

    U.S. Treasury officials have visited Turkey several times to advise banks dealing with proscribed Iranian entities that they risked being frozen out of the U.S. financial system.

    Asked if U.S. officials had met directly with Halkbank, Aslan said: “We have had meetings in the past,” but he denied the bank had come under any pressure.

    “We are pursuing this matter in a transparent way because we are not doing anything illegal, we are handling this matter in a very open way by talking to all sides. All our communication channels are open.”

    This month a Turkish energy ministry official confirmed Turkey would seek a U.S. waiver for Tupras, a major customer for Iranian oil.

    Obama could grant waivers to institutions in countries that significantly reduce dealings with Iran.

    Tupras, according to industry sources familiar with the company’s strategy, is seeking to buy more oil from Saudi Arabia to reduce dependence on Iran for supplies.

    Turkey imports over 200,000 barrels per day, around 30 percent of its consumption, from Iran.

    On a visit to Ankara this month, Iran’s foreign minister projected annual trade with Turkey doubling in the coming four years to reach $30 billion in 2015, while Turkey’s urbanization minister said the two countries were planning important steps to ease money transfer processes.

    (Writing by Jonathon Burch; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)

    via Exclusive: Halkbank to handle Iran payments so long as legal | Reuters.

  • Turkey, Russia converge on Syria and Iran crisis

    Turkey, Russia converge on Syria and Iran crisis

    Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said Turkey and Russia had a similar stance on ending the bloodshed in Syria, adding that Turkey is ready to work with Russia on solving the crisis.

    Davutoglu and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov also said the two countries have almost the same position regarding Iran.

    “An immediate halt to the bloodshed and an implementation of the reform process in Syria is important. Turkey and Russia share a similar stance on these issues,” Davutoglu said on the close cooperation between Turkey and Russia on Syrian crisis, at a joint press conference with his Russian counterpart.

    “We are always ready to work with Russia, which has an important role in the region, to solve the Syrian crisis through intense dialogue. We believe Russia could make a significant contribution on this issue,” Davutoglu said, adding that they always back the Arab League initiative which aimed to end the regime crackdown on protesters, Anatolia news agency reported.

    Lavrov echoed Davutoglu’s words, saying Russia and Turkey have a similar stance on Syria.

    “Russia wants the bloodshed to end and we are in favor of a peaceful solution to the crisis through political means,” Lavrov said.

    On Iran he also said Russia and Turkey had almost same position and that Russia wants this issue to be solved through diplomatic means. Lavrov revealed that they held the second meeting of the Joint Strategic Planning Group yesterday, saying Russia and Turkey were holding such meetings to converge on their positions.

    Davutoglu said Turkey’s position with Russia was very similar on the Iran issue and talks on Iran’s nuclear program should resume rapidly. He said Turkey was ready to host the talks, if Iran returned to negotiation table. Lavrov confirmed that Russia was in favor of the nuclear talks being held in Turkey. Lavrov stated that Russia would consider “constructive proposals” to end the bloodshed in Syria but was opposed to force or sanctions.

    via Turkey, Russia converge on Syria and Iran crisis.