Category: Iran

  • NATO missiles in Turkey shield Israel, a plot against Russia: Layos Szaszdi

    NATO missiles in Turkey shield Israel, a plot against Russia: Layos Szaszdi

    An analyst says NATO missiles deployed in Turkey under the pretext of protecting Ankara against Syrian attacks are in actual fact aimed at Russia in pursuit of Israeli interests.

    The comment comes as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) military alliance says it has made the first set of Patriot missiles operational on the Turkey-Syria border.

    NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander for Europe Admiral James Stavridis has backed the deployment of Patriot missiles, saying it shows the alliance’s willingness to defend allies facing threats.

    Six batteries of the US-made missiles, effective against aircraft and short-range missiles, will be deployed in the southern city of Adana and the southeastern cities of Kahramanmaras and Gaziantep.

    The Syrian government has censured the plan, calling it another act of provocation by the government of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

    Press TV has conducted an interview with Layos Szaszdi, political commentator in Washington to further discuss the issue. What follows is a rough transcription of the interview.

    Press TV: Mr. Szaszdi, we see foreign-backed insurgents literally killing civilians in Syria, execution style. Why has the international community remained silent on this and why isn’t it doing anything about it?

    Szaszdi: Well, because they do support the rebels. They want them to succeed because their ultimate goal is to topple the government in Damascus and this is a broad coalition that includes Western powers headed or led by the United States and including France, United Kingdom, Germany, Turkey of course– a major spring board for the rebels.

    And that’s why the Patriot missiles are being deployed in the regions where they are near the city of Adana, near the city of Kahramanmara because probably those areas, certainly the city of Adana were the US base of Incirlik Base are entry ports; from where? Well, not entry ports but staging points where supplies are provided to the rebels in Syria.

    So because of this broad alliance or coalition including Western powers and Middle Eastern powers, Persian Gulf, Arab States of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, probably Israel also is supporting the rebels so that’s why they don’t denounce the crimes committed by the rebels particularly the al-Nusra front which by the way the United States has declared a terrorist organization.

    So there is this common goal that unites the Saudis, the Israelis, the Turks, the Germans and the Americans which bring down the government in Damascus as part of the information war, the propaganda war.

    They are not going to mention or accuse the rebels of committing crimes. Everything that is going wrong; any war crime that is being committed in Syria they are always going to be blame it on the government in Damascus.

    Press TV: As far as the NATO Patriot missiles are concerned, you spoke about them, how should one interpret these missiles and of course where does the international law fit in this?

    Szaszdi: Well, Turkey is a NATO member, they do have the right to deploy, these NATO allies, the US, the Netherlands, Germany (have the right to) to deploy these Patriot missiles which are regarded as a defensive weapon in the Eastern borders of Turkey.

    Now of course it’s my belief that where the missiles are being deployed near the city of Adana, Kahramanmaras were the Germans missiles, two batteries of Patriot missiles are being deployed, they are being deployed there because it’s a staging point from where the rebels obtained supplies, weapons, and volunteers.

    So they are military targets, that’s why they are deploying missiles in case that Syria supposedly would like to retaliate launching attacks against those staging bases from where the rebels are being fed with weapons, volunteers, supplies, and etcetera but of course Syria is not going to provoke NATO to intervene.

    I would say that these Patriot missiles are part of an extension of the European missile defense system which is actually aimed against Russia and Iran and the Russians know it.

    They know that this is an excuse, the deployment of the Patriot missiles claiming that it is to protect Turkey against Syrian missile attack or air attack but in fact it’s aimed against Russia and its part of a broader missile defense system that does not just include NATO European missile defense System but also Japan presumably.

    And in the case of the Patriot batteries being deployed in Eastern Turkey they could be connected to the more sophisticated missile defense system which is the Theater High Altitude Area Defense system also known by its acronym (THAAD) and there is a fire control [system and a] radar for that missile system which is the AN/TPY-2 and that radar is mobile so supposedly now it’s pointing Iran since its mobile it can turned pointing Russia.

    Why Russia? Because I believe that these European missile defense system including the Patriot batteries can be linked to that fire control radar I just mentioned, could be used to defend Israel in case that Israel would attack Russia for instance move their intercontinental ballistic missile force including the Jericho-III ICBM that can reach Moscow and St. Petersburg.

    And Israelis have been targeting the Soviet Union since the late eighties presumably they’re still targeting Russia due to its support to Syria, to Iran for instance though it is a friendly nation. So presumably the missiles can be used against Russia too.

    VG/JR

    via PressTV – NATO missiles in Turkey shield Israel, a plot against Russia: Layos Szaszdi.

  • Iraqi MP: Turkey’s Policy on Iraq to Ignite War

    Iraqi MP: Turkey’s Policy on Iraq to Ignite War

    A1133900TEHRAN (FNA)- An Iraqi lawmaker lashed out at Ankara for its aggressive policy on Iraq, and cautioned that the policy will likely result in conflict.

    “Ankara wishes to annex Iraq to Turkey even if the materialization of that dream results in a new war between the two neighboring countries,” Hossein al-Maraabi told FNA in Baghdad.

    He added that Turkey has taken advantages of the political crisis in Iraq to meddle with Baghdad’s affairs in a move to obtain its interests.

    Meantime, the lawmaker blamed Iraqi Parliament Speaker Osama al-Nujaifi for preventing Baghdad from giving a firm response to Turkey.

    “The ignorance shown by Osama al-Nujaifi towards this issue caused Iraq to avoid adopting such a strong stance as severing its economic or political ties with that country,” he said.

    In similar remarks last week, a senior advisor to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki lashed out at Ankara for its interference in the internal affairs of the regional states, and took Turkey responsible for growing unrests in the region.

    “The wrong policies of the government of (Turkish Prime Minister) Erdogan and the country’s Foreign Minister (Ahmet Davutoglu) are the main cause of unrests in the region,” Ali Al-Moussavi told FNA on Sunday.

    “With the green light of some powerful countries, Erdogan has started unjustified and unnecessary meddling in the affairs of the regional countries, specially Iraq and Syria since several months ago and that meddling can fuel unrests in the region,” Moussavi stated.

    He added that Iraq has informed Ankara of its anger at Turkey’s policies through Ankara’s embassy in Baghdad, and noted, “Their policy is outside the diplomatic norms and is also condemned at the UN.”

    The remarks by Moussavi came after Davutoglu on Friday expressed deep concerns over the ongoing internal tension in neighboring Iraq and claimed that Maliki appeared to have largely lost the confidence of his people.

    via Fars News Agency :: Iraqi MP: Turkey’s Policy on Iraq to Ignite War.

  • Turkey: What is Iran Doing with Turkish Gold?

    Turkey: What is Iran Doing with Turkish Gold?

    Turkey’s multi-billion-dollar gold sales to neighboring Iran could put the country on a collision course with its close ally, the United States, when high-ranking diplomats from the two countries hold talks in Washington.

    Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan shakes hands with Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at an Economic Cooperation Organization Summit in Baku in 2012. Despite international pressure on Turkey to stop selling gold to Iran, the two countries' gold trade for 2012 equaled more than $11 billion. (Photo: Turkish Prime Minister's Office.)
    Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan shakes hands with Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at an Economic Cooperation Organization Summit in Baku in 2012. Despite international pressure on Turkey to stop selling gold to Iran, the two countries’ gold trade for 2012 equaled more than $11 billion. (Photo: Turkish Prime Minister’s Office.)

    Turkish Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Feridun Sinirlioğlu was scheduled to be in Washington from January 14-16 for discussions with State Department officials, including US Deputy Secretary of State William Burns. The gold sales were expected to come up during the talks, which will cover a broad range of Middle East-related topics. But a senior Turkish official told EurasiaNet.org that Turkey itself did not intend to raise the gold-for-gas issue.

    “We have no plans to talk about it, but the US can bring it up,” said the source, who requested anonymity.

    Through the first six months of 2012 Turkey’s gold trade with Iran totaled $6.5 billion, according to various news reports. For the entire year, the value of the gold shipped to Iran from Turkey is estimated at $11-12 billion, according to industry analysts and media accounts. Worldwide in 2010-11, Turkey had total exports of gold and precious gems worth about $4 billion.

    The massive 2012 gold transfers are part of the Turkish payment for its gas imports from Iran, which meets 18 percent of Turkey’s annual demand of 50 billion cubic meters. The arrangement makes Iran the country’s second-largest supplier after Russia.

    The sales, made through Switzerland and Abu Dhabi, have “become probably the most important source of income to Iran and . . . have allowed Iran to use gold as its main currency for securing necessities from abroad,” commented consultant Attila Yesilada of the Istanbul-based research consultancy Global Source Partners.

    The flow of gas and gold now must maneuver around a US ban introduced this year on the sale of precious metals to Iran; the latest tactic in Washington’s effort to curtail Iran’s nuclear research efforts. Authors of the legislation named Turkey as one of its prime targets. Most Turkish financial institutions have offices in the United States, and thus could be liable for prosecution; a powerful incentive for Turkish compliance with the ban.

    So far, Ankara has striven to show that it is not cowed by the ban. “We are only bound by sanctions passed by the UN Security Council and not by unilateral sanctions by individual countries,” said Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesperson Selcuk Unal in December.

    Nonetheless, for all the tough words, Ankara previously has avoided confrontations with Washington over Iran, and “abided by all US legal measures against Tehran,” commented Inan Demir, chief economist at the privately owned Finansbank.

    In a possible gesture to Washington earlier in January, Turkish customs officials grounded a Turkish-owned cargo plane, en route from the United Arab Emirates to Iran, after it made an emergency landing at Istanbul’s Sabiha Gökçen airport. The Turkish media widely reported the plane was carrying 1.5 tons of gold and had arrived from an African country.

    The dispute over gold transfers is putting Ankara in a tight spot. Iranian gas is crucial to Ankara’s efforts to diversify its gas imports. The Turkish government is reluctant to increase its already heavy dependency on Russia for energy.

    One solution increasingly being touted is the age-old practice of bartering, a measure already used by India to buy oil from Iran. A Turkish diplomatic source acknowledged that a barter deal could be brokered. “Turkish government agencies will be looking into this. We need to support economic growth with all countries, including with Iran, in this challenging world economic climate,” the official said.

    A business network already exists in Turkey to facilitate such trades. Over 2,000 Iranian companies now operate in Turkey, most of which have been set up in the past few years, according to the government.

    Bartering has the added bonus for Turkey that, unlike gold, which it has to import, any products it barters would be locally produced. The question, though, remains of whether Turkey has a sufficient amount of tradable and desirable goods to cover their Iranian energy bill.

    “The problem now is neither Ankara nor Washington knows what Iran is using its gold for; it might be buying necessities — medicine, food. Or maybe [it is] financing [Syrian President Bashar] Assad’s forces or Hezbollah in Lebanon in … some terror acts,” speculated Global Source Partners’ Yesilada. “With barter, that is completely removed from the equation because you can’t buy arms with jam.”

    There remain other alternatives for Turkey, liquefied gas from Arab Gulf States, but that is more expensive. A cheaper option is from the neighboring semi-autonomous Iraqi Kurdish region, but any new pipeline would take at least a year to build. Deep divisions between the Iraqi Kurds and the central government in Baghdad over the distribution of the country’s energy riches, further complicates the issue. For now it seems Ankara will be looking for new creative ways of paying for its Iranian gas.

    Editor’s note:

    Dorian Jones is a freelance reporter based in Istanbul.

    via Turkey: What is Iran Doing with Turkish Gold? | EurasiaNet.org.

  • Iran-Turkey trade can reach $100bn per year: Iran envoy

    Iran-Turkey trade can reach $100bn per year: Iran envoy

    yasaman.hashemi20130114101125947

    Iran’s Ambassador to Turkey Bahman Hosseinpour

    Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:5AM GMT

    Iran’s Ambassador to Turkey Bahman Hosseinpour says the volume of trade transactions between Tehran and Ankara can reach as high as USD 100 billion per year.

    Explaining the upward trend in the bilateral trade between Iran and Turkey over the past years, Hosseinpour said the many capacities of the two countries can be further explored to boost the trade transactions to USD 100 billion per year.

    “For the first time, the value of trade between Iran and Turkey will exceed USD 21 billion this [Iranian calendar] year (started March 20, 2012),” Hosseinpour said on Monday.

    The value of the Iran-Turkey trade surpassed USD 16 billion in 2011. The two countries plan to increase the level of their bilateral trade volume to USD 30 billion by 2015.

    Commenting on the US-led sanctions against Iran, Hosseinpour said, “There is no doubt that Western governments, particularly the US, are exerting pressure on Turkey to decrease its trade ties with Iran and these pressures are continuing.”

    He added, however, that “despite the West’s and the US’s pressure on Turkey, we have succeeded to come up with ways to increase the [bilateral] trade volume.”

    The illegal US-engineered sanctions have been imposed on Iran based on the unfounded allegation that the Islamic Republic is pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program.

    Iran rejects the allegation, arguing that as a committed signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

    YH/HMV/HJL

    via PressTV – Iran-Turkey trade can reach $100bn per year: Iran envoy.

  • Patriot missiles in Turkey meant to protect Israel

    Patriot missiles in Turkey meant to protect Israel

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast says the deployment of NATO’s patriot missiles in Turkey is aimed at safeguarding Israel.

    rabbani20130105182446447

    A Patriot missile system (file photo)

    In an interview with al-Manar TV, Mehmanparast said that during his recent visit to Turkey, Turkish officials had told him that a military conflict was probable between Turkey and Syria and that the missiles were aimed to support the country against possible Syria attacks.

    “Iran, however, believes that Western countries and the NATO have deployed the system in Turkey with the aim of supporting the Zionist regime so that in case of an Israeli military adventurism against Iran and Iran’s response to the measure, Western countries can safeguard Israel with the help of the missile system,” Mehmanparast said.

    He also said that Turkey will neither participate in any military action against Iran nor allow its airspace to be used against Iran, but added that the control of the Patriot missile system was in the hands of the NATO and the West.

    NATO has begun deploying Patriot surface-to-air (SAM) missiles along Turkey’s border with Syria. A group of US troops also arrived in Turkey on Friday to begin operating missile batteries.

    The US will provide two out of six such batteries, while Germany and the Netherlands will each contribute two. All the six Patriot batteries are scheduled to be operational by the end of January.

    AR/MA

    via PressTV – Patriot missiles in Turkey meant to protect Israel: Iran.

  • Turkey stops publishing details of oil imports from Iran

    Turkey stops publishing details of oil imports from Iran

    Turkey’s refiner Tupras has urged the country’s statistics agency to stop divulging details of its oil imports from Iran amid US sanctions on Tehran’s oil sector over its nuclear energy program.

    fathi20130105063443460

    Turkey says it stops publishing details of the country’s oil imports from Iran.(file photo)

    The Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) stopped detailing its oil imports in late December and released only figures for total monthly imports.

    “Tupras asked us last month not to reveal the origin of our crude oil imports and instead give an overall figure,” a TUIK official said, requesting anonymity.

    “We were not informed of the reason for the change in policy,” he said.

    Tupras officials and TUIK declined to comment on the issue.

    Before the change in policy, Tupras had received two Iranian crude cargoes of 145,000 tons and one of 140,000 tons at the Tutunciftlik import terminal.

    At the beginning of 2012, the US and the European Union imposed new sanctions on Iran’s oil and financial sectors with the goal of preventing other countries from purchasing Iranian oil and conducting transactions with the Central Bank of Iran.

    On October 15, 2012, the EU foreign ministers reached an agreement on another round of sanctions against Iran.

    The United States granted 180-day waivers on Iran oil sanctions to Turkey on December 7, 2012.

    The illegal US-engineered sanctions were imposed based on the unfounded accusation that Iran is pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program.

    Iran rejects the allegations, arguing that as a committed signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

    SF/AZ/MA

    via PressTV – Turkey stops publishing details of oil imports from Iran.