Category: Iran

  • Iranian Ayatollah Claims Jews Invented Buddhism

    Iranian Ayatollah Claims Jews Invented Buddhism

    February 28, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield

    40366_pro

    Muslims excel at picking fights with other religions. If there’s a religion out there that isn’t Islam, Muslims will sooner or later get into a fight with it. Even if the religion is Islam, Muslims will still fight each other over which Islam is the right one.

    But the main idea of Islamism is that the Jews are behind all the evil in the world. So when Muslims get into a fight with Buddhists, who are not that easy to provoke, their theology demands that the whole thing be explained in terms of Evil Jew Theory.

    And that leaves them no other choicebut to claim that the Jews invented Buddhism. Buddhism predates Islam. But Muslims have no problem dismissing older traditions and cultures as pawns of the Jewish Devil and then destroying them.

    In an August 8, 2012 interview with the Rasa news agency titled “The Cruel Genocide Against The Muslim People In Myanmar,” Ayatollah Ruhollah Qarehi, head of the Imam Mahdi seminary in Tehran, said: “The genocide of the Muslims in Myanmar is ostensibly being carried out by the Buddhists, but we are certain that Judaism and Global Zionism are [behind] the massacre and the genocide against the Muslims… The tenets of Buddhism are derived from Judaism. The Buddhists are a tool [in the hands] of the Jews, and ‘Buddhism’ is a name behind which [hides] the hand of Judaism and Global Zionism.

    Why did Jews invent Buddhism? Because everyone hates Jews and everyone loves Buddhists. So the Jews just started claiming to be Asians and calling themselves Buddhists.

    But, since the Jew knows that he is an [object of] derision throughout the world, he hides behind a pseudonym like ‘Buddhism.’ Lecturers at seminaries and universities, as well as the media, must [speak up] in various languages and in eloquent terms… and explain to the people and to our dear youth that behind [the term] ‘Buddhism’ there [hides] the Jew.”

    It was a brilliant plan and the Jews would have gotten away with it too if it wasn’t for Muslims. And unsatisfied with just pretending to be Buddhists, the Jews also control Hinduism, apparently.

    “Today the Jewish hand emerges from the sleeve of the Buddhists in Burma [i.e., Myanmar], [trying to] retaliate against the seekers of freedom in Muslim lands by harming the poverty-stricken Muslims of Myanmar.”

    Poverty-stricken but also rather rapey and foreign, which may have something to do with Buddhist anger.

    “It is no surprise, [then], that the media and international community have remained silent [over the events in Myanmar], for they are controlled by the political and economic power of the Zionists

    Yes, the international community is notoriously silent when it comes to condemning Israel for horrifying crimes such as building houses.

    Basij Commander Mohammad Reza Naqdi expands the conspiracy beyond mere Judaism to America and Freemasonry.

    America and the Zionists are the main culprits [responsible for] the genocide of Muslims in Myanmar. [But] our [Iranian] nation is aware of [their] plots. Last Friday, we witnessed protests [that were held] throughout the country after the Friday prayers, at which calls of ‘Death to Zionism’ and ‘Death to America’ were heard. This shows that, in the case of Myanmar, they did not manage to divert the people’s attention away from the main perpetrators of the crime [in that country].

    “Global Zionism and Freemasonry are the planners of all crimes against the Muslims.

    Any chance they can appoint these guys to negotiate one-on-one with Kerry?

     

    Filed Under: The Point Tagged With: Buddhism, Iran, muslim anti-semitism
    About Daniel Greenfield

    Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.

  • Iran’s Embassy protests unfortunate TV program aired in Turkey

    Iran’s Embassy protests unfortunate TV program aired in Turkey

    The Iranian Embassy in Ankara, Turkey (file photo)

    fathi20130302074513680The Iranian Embassy in Ankara has protested against the broadcast of a program by Turkey’s BTV channel that contains material about the internal affairs of the Islamic Republic.

    In a protest letter sent to the BTV manager on Friday, the Iranian Embassy protested against Guncel program’s unfortunate choice of incorrect remarks about Iranian officials and the internal affairs of the country.

    Raising ‘baseless and false’ issues about the developments in Iran is merely aimed at distorting the public opinion of the Turkish people about the Iranian nation, the letter added.

    Iranian people have proved loyalty to the Islamic Revolution through their high turnout in demonstrations marking the victory of the revolution over the past years, the Iranian Embassy stated, apparently referring to the content of the BTV program.

    The letter also expressed hope that BTV would work to portray realities and strengthen the friendship between the Turkish people and the Iranian nation.

    SF/HSN/MA

    via PressTV – Iran’s Embassy protests unfortunate TV program aired in Turkey.

  • Accession to EU could undermine Turkey’s sovereignty: Iran MP

    Accession to EU could undermine Turkey’s sovereignty: Iran MP

    shamsara20130302081413327

    Turkey entered formal membership talks with the European Union in 2005.

    An Iranian lawmaker says Turkey should honor its own sovereignty and be aware about the ramifications of adopting submissive policies aimed at laying the groundwork for its accession to the European Union.

    Mansour Haqiqatpour, a member of Iran’s Majlis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy, said on Friday, “Turkey must not trade its sovereignty for membership in the European Union.”

    The Iranian lawmaker made the comment in reference to recent remarks by German Chancellor Angela Merkel about Turkey’s accession to the EU.

    In her last week visit to Turkey, Merkel called for resumption of negotiations for Ankara’s accession to the EU despite objections both within the German ruling party and in other European countries against Turkey’s membership.

    “Turkey must find its own indigenous model of development and it should not appeal for the West’s help for attaining progress, because that undermines the dignity of the Turkish nation,” Haqiqatpour said.

    “For years, the Turkish government has gone to any lengths by adopting numerous initiatives, applying constant changes to its economic laws and trying to adapt itself to the liberal-democracy culture.”

    “When the Europeans witness Turkey’s passion for accession to the EU, they easily impose any kind of law on the country which ensures the West’s interests and inflicts damage to the Turkish economy and culture,” the Iranian lawmaker pointed out.

    He alluded to the exacerbating economic crisis across the EU, including in Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy and said, “By witnessing the conditions of these countries, Turkey must conclude that membership in this bankrupt union will worsen the country’s condition instead of improving it.”

    An opinion poll conducted by the Turkish Bosforo University between December 15 and 17, 2012, showed that 59 percent of the people in Turkey do not agree with its membership in the EU.

    A similar opinion poll conducted in 2003 showed that 73 percent of the Turkish people welcomed the membership and only 27 percent of the respondents rejected the bid.

    Turkey, which straddles Asia and Europe, entered formal membership talks with the European Union in 2005, but reluctance among some EU states on the matter has slowed the process to a near standstill.

    ASH/HSN/MA

    via PressTV – Accession to EU could undermine Turkey’s sovereignty: Iran MP.

  • Turkey Hails Iran’s Envoy for Strong, Constructive Activities

    Turkey Hails Iran’s Envoy for Strong, Constructive Activities

    Turkey Hails Iran’s Envoy for Strong, Constructive Activities

    A0871466TEHRAN (FNA)- Mayor of Turkey’s Northwestern city of Istanbul Kadir Topbas praised the activities of Iranian Consul-General in Istanbul Mahmoud Heidari, and called for the expansion of bilateral ties between the two friendly countries in all arenas.

    The issue was raised in the farewell ceremony of Herdari at the end of his diplomatic tenure in Istanbul as Iran’s consul-general on Friday.

    During the meeting, Topbas appreciated outgoing Iranian diplomat’s efforts to strengthen bilateral ties between two Muslim nations, and hoped for expansion of mutual cooperation between the two states.

    Iran and Turkey have in recent years increased their cooperation in all the various fields of economy, security, trade, education, energy and culture.

    Turkey’s crude imports from Iran leapt in March to 1.17 million tons, rejecting the speculations that Ankara has bowed to US pressures to curb oil trades with Tehran.

    The data was announced by Turkey’s census institute. The center reported that the country’s oil imports from Iran have hit a record in the 8 months before March.

    This is while the Turkish government had earlier promised the US that it would implement a maximum 20% decrease in oil imports from Iran to cooperate with Washington in imposing unilateral sanctions against Tehran.

    Meantime, Turkey’s Energy Minister Taner Yildiz had earlier said that Ankara is resolved to continue oil imports from Iran despite the sanctions imposed on Iranian oil by the US and the European Union.

    The Turkish minister said in February that his country is only committed to the decisions made by the United Nations in this regard.

    The two sides have exchanged several politico-economic delegations during the last few months.

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul in a meeting with Iranian Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani in February underlined the need for the removal of obstacles to the further expansion of bilateral economic ties with Iran in a bid to boost trade cooperation between the two countries.

    “The level of economic and trade cooperation between the two countries does not suit the age-old ties of the two nations and we should remove the obstacles to the development of mutual cooperation between Iran and Turkey,” Gul said at the time.

    via Fars News Agency :: Turkey Hails Iran’s Envoy for Strong, Constructive Activities.

  • Turkey’s Foray Into the Fertile Crescent

    Turkey’s Foray Into the Fertile Crescent

    28iht-edcagaptay28-articleLarge

    The rebel-controlled Atmeh refugee camp in northern Syria is only yards from the border with Turkey, which provides strong support to the Syrian rebels.

    By SONER CAGAPTAY

    The biggest open secret in Ankara is that Turkey detests Iran, which it sees as undermining its interests in Syria and Iraq. Turkish leaders will not admit this publicly, for their country desperately needs Iranian natural gas and oil to continue its phenomenal economic growth.

    But Ankara increasingly regards both Iraq and Syria as arenas for proxy conflict with Iran; in the former, Turkey backs the Sunni Arabs and Kurds against the central government in Baghdad under Shiite Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, seen by Turkey as an Iranian puppet; in the latter, Ankara supports the rebels against the Tehran-backed Assad regime.

    Turkey has answered Iran’s challenge by building influence in the northern parts of both Iraq and Syria. This signals the rise of a yet-undeclared Turkish policy in the Middle East: Anticipating the decentralization of post-Assad Syria, and hoping to take advantage of Iraq’s autonomous Kurdish north, Turkey is carving out a cordon sanitaire across the northern Fertile Crescent, building influence in the Kurdish population as well as in large commercial centers such as Aleppo and Mosul.

    When Turkey moved to foster closer ties with its Muslim neighbors about a decade ago, it hoped that such relations would help boost Iraq’s stability and improve political ties with Syria and Iran.

    But the Arab rebellions have rendered these designs obsolete. At first Ankara provided the Assad regime with friendly advice to stop killing civilians. But the Damascus regime refused, and Turkey’s stance flipped in August 2011: Ankara went from being Assad’s friendly neighbor to his chief adversary. Turkey started providing safe haven to the Syrian opposition, and, according to media reports, even arming the rebels.

    This policy has cast Ankara and Tehran, Assad’s patron, as chief rivals in Syria. And this, in turn, has exacerbated competition in Iraq, where Ankara supported Ayad Allawi’s secular Iraqiya bloc in the run-up to the 2010 elections, poisoning relations with Maliki.

    In the aftermath of Maliki’s reelection, Ankara has favored closer contacts among Sunni Arabs and Kurds in northern Iraq. Turkey’s trade volume with northern Iraq has climbed to $8 billion per year compared to only $2 billion with the southern portion of the country, and Ankara is seeking lucrative oil deals with Iraqi Kurds.

    In short, for all practical purposes, northern Iraq has become part of the Turkish sphere of influence. This is especially surprising considering that only a few years ago Turkish hostility toward Iraqi Kurdish leaders seemed ready to boil over into an outright invasion of the area.

    Today, by contrast, Turkish Airlines offers daily flights to Sulaymaniyah and Erbil inside the Kurdistan Regional Government (K.R.G.) in northern Iraq, and Iraqi Kurds take vacations in Antalya, a Turkish resort city on the Mediterranean.

    Mosul, a Sunni-majority province in northern Iraq, is also pivoting toward Ankara. Turkey currently provides safe haven to Tariq al-Hashimi, Iraq’s Sunni vice president, whose arrest warrant has become a rallying cause for many Sunnis. At the same time, historic links between Mosul and Turkey, dating back to the Ottoman Empire, are being resurrected: When I last visited Gaziantep, a city in southern Turkey, my hotel was full of Arab businessmen from Mosul.

    Before the Syrian uprising began, a similar development was taking place in Aleppo, another Fertile Crescent city that enjoyed deep commercial ties with Turkey under the Ottoman Empire.

    Located only 26 miles from the border, Aleppo had become a focal point of Turkish businesses in northern Syria, and there is no doubt that the strong support the Turks have provided to the rebels in northern Syria will increase Turkey’s influence in the city after the end of the Assad regime (it is no accident that the largest contiguous rebel-controlled areas in Syria are around Aleppo).

    The missing part of Turkey’s prospective influence in the northern Fertile Crescent were the Syrian Kurds — until Turkey announced peace talks with the Kurdistan Workers Party (P.K.K.). This group, which has waged a war against Turkey for over three decades, is also known to be the best-organized movement among the Syrian Kurds.

    Ankara hopes that peace talks with the P.K.K. will help heal the bad blood with Syrian Kurds. Indeed, Turkey has reworked its Middle East policy: It now views the Kurds as the foundation of its zone of influence across the northern Fertile Crescent.

    Yet not all is rosy for Turkey. The peace talks with the P.K.K. could go awry, driving P.K.K. rejectionists into the arms of Iran or even Baghdad. There is also an emerging threat in allowing radical fighters into northern Syria. This is a dangerous game, for once the Assad regime falls, Turkey might find itself with a jihadist problem in its newly acquired sphere of influence.

    Soner Cagaptay is director of the Turkish Research Program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and the author of “Turkey Rising: 21st Century’s First Muslim Power.”

    A version of this op-ed appeared in print on February 28, 2013, in The International Herald Tribune.
  • Iran, world powers agree to new nuclear talks in Istanbul, Almaty

    Iran, world powers agree to new nuclear talks in Istanbul, Almaty

    Almaty, Kazakhstan__ Negotiators from Iran and six world powers announced they would hold two more meetings over the next month to discuss a new international proposal aimed at curbing Iran’s 20% enrichment and nuclear breakout capacity, in exchange for some sanctions relief. The announcement came at the conclusion of two days of talks here that have seemingly turned out to be among the most positive of the past year, though both sides say they still have some work to do to narrow differences.

    27iran_cnd-articleLarge

    The parties agreed to hold an experts meeting in Istanbul on March 18, followed by a political directors meeting, again in Almaty, Kazakhstan on April 5-6, negotiators from the P5+1 and Iran announced in a joint statement at the conclusion of talks Wednesday.

    Iran’s chief negotiator Saeed Jalili described the Almaty meeting as “positive,” while his American and European counterparts characterized it, more cautiously, as “useful,” stressing the imperative is results, not atmospherics.

    “I would say it was a useful meeting,” a senior US official told journalists Wednesday. “The day we have concrete results, I will use a different adjective.”

    European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, speaking at the conclusion of talks Wednesday, said she welcomed if the Iranian side “are looking positively at proposals we put forward.” But, she added, “I believe in looking at what the results are.”

    The centerpiece of the two-day meeting was a presentation Tuesday by Ashton of a revised international proposal focused on curbing Iran’s 20% enrichment, suspending operations at the fortified Fordow enrichment facility, and increasing nuclear safeguards, transparency and IAEA inspections that would prevent a rapid Iranian breakout capability, the US diplomat said.

    The updated offer somewhat eases demands to entirely “stop, shut and ship” its 20% stockpile made in a proposal put forward in Baghdad last May.

    Unlike the past proposal, the updated one would allow Iran to keep a sufficient amount of its 20% enriched fuel to fuel a research reactor that produces isotopes to treat Iranian cancer patients, the US diplomat said.

    The revised proposal also calls for “suspension of enrichment” at Fordo–rather than shuttering the fortified facility, built into a mountain in Qom– and would “constrain the ability to quickly resume operations there,” the American official said. It also calls for enhanced IAEA monitoring measures “to promote greater transparency…and provide early warning” of any attempted breakout effort, the official said.

    In exchange, the proposal offers an easing of some sanctions. The US official said the proposed sanctions relief at this stage does not involve oil or financial sanctions, but other US and European Union imposed sanctions, which the official declined to specify. It would also offer to not impose new UN Security Council or European Union proliferation sanctions, as the previous offer also had. “We never regarded sanctions as an end in themselves,” the American official said.

    The US official declined to say whether the updated proposal asks Iran to halt installation of more advanced centrifuges at its Natanz enrichment facility, that could considerably speed up Iran’s enrichment capacity.

    Jalili offered rare praise for the international proposal, acknowledging it demonstrated a clear effort to respond to Iranian concerns. “We believe this is a…turning point,” he said through at a translator at a press conference Wednesday. The six parties “have moved closer to our proposal.”

    There were signs over the past two days that the meeting was going well compared to earlier rounds.

    Members of Iran’s negotiating team held a series of unannounced bilateral meetings with diplomats from Russia, China, and unusually Germany and the UK Tuesday night, western officials said. (Former Iranian ambassador to the UK Rasoul Movahedian-Atar, a member of Iran’s negotiating team here, met with former British ambassador to Iran Simon Gass, who now serves as the lead British negotiator at the talks, American and British diplomats said.)

    The lack of aggressive Iranian posturing as the meeting got underway Tuesday hinted that Iranian negotiators may have been persuaded that the revised P5+1 proposal had moved at least some way to respond to their concerns, including in offering some sanctions relief, and that they should at least agree to study and discuss it further.

    By the conclusion of talks Wednesday, it was evident that Iran had decided to spin the updated offer as a diplomatic success for Tehran, that responded to an Iranian proposal presented at a meeting in Moscow last June.

    Also notable, the Iranian delegation did not hang posters of assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists on the podium before Jalili’s press conference, as it had at several earlier rounds.

    Earlier in the week, on the eve of talks, Western diplomats said they would like to come to agreement here on a follow-on meeting, or series of meetings, at the expert level. A meeting of non-proliferation experts held last July in Istanbul was productive and involved more US-Iran interactions, American officials said Monday.

    Lead US negotiator at the talks, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman, travels Thursday to Israel, Jordan and Saudi Arabia to brief Middle East allies and GCC states about the Iran consultations and other matters.

    (Pool Photo, via NYT.)

    via Iran, world powers agree to new nuclear talks in Istanbul, Almaty | The Back Channel.