Category: Europe

  • THE GEORGIAN-RUSSIAN CONFLICT THROUGH THE EYES OF BAKU

    THE GEORGIAN-RUSSIAN CONFLICT THROUGH THE EYES OF BAKU

    By Fariz Ismailzade

    Tuesday, August 12, 2008

     

    The escalating conflict in Georgia–with its unexpected military developments and great humanitarian losses–seems to have caught Azerbaijani officials and the public off guard. Azerbaijanis are not new to the world of Russian political games in the Caucasus. Baku itself suffered greatly from Russian intervention in 1990 and after that from the military conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. Yet, the rapid and aggressive style of Russian intervention in Georgia in the past few days has created far greater security and economic dilemmas for Azerbaijan than even the most pessimistic analysts in the country could have predicted only a week ago.

    Russian jet fighters have bombed both civilians and military airports in Georgia, forcing all airlines, including Azerbaijani Airlines (AZAL), to stop flights. Moreover, for several days in a row the Russians bombed the Black Sea port of Poti, which serves as the main terminal for the export of Azerbaijani energy products as well as other cargo. With the explosions on the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline last week, Azerbaijan was looking for Georgian railways, ports and pipelines as an important alternative for the export of Caspian energy supplies to Western markets. All of this has stopped, putting both Georgia and Azerbaijan in economic difficulties. Nonetheless, there is little fear in official circles in Baku that Russia will bomb the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline and other energy-related infrastructures to destroy the successful East-West transport and energy corridor between Azerbaijan and Georgia.

    Azerbaijan is Georgia’s strategic ally. Both countries are united not only by geopolitical interests and world-class pipelines, but also by the regional security organization GUAM. GUAM, although passive for most of the decade, has lately been re-energized and even played with the idea of establishing its own peacekeeping and security forces. Under such a situation, it seems like GUAM would be a convenient venue to express support and solidarity with the Georgians.

    Azerbaijan, however, finds itself in a very difficult situation. On the one hand, there is enormous public support for Georgia throughout Azerbaijan. In private conversations, almost all Azerbaijanis blame Russia for aggression and express frustration with the imperialist policies of the Kremlin in the South Caucasus. A group of intelligentsia went to the Russian embassy on August 10 to protest against the military actions in Georgia ). This was repeated by members of youth organizations (www.day.az, August 11). The main opposition party Musavat issued a statement on August 11, calling for “respect of the territorial integrity of Georgia and an immediate stop to the aggressive policy of Russia” (Musavat party press release). The party called on the Azerbaijani government to show a “principled position” on the conflict. A similar statement came from the Democratic Party of Azerbaijan.

    For its pro-Georgian coverage of the events, the most popular Azerbaijani news website www.day.az was attacked by Russian special forces on August 11 and had to cease its activities temporarily (www.day.az press release, August 11). Elnur Baimov, the editor in chief of www.day.az said on August 11 that “we all saw the diplomatic loss of Russia.”

    Government officials have been relatively calm about the situation, considering the fragile relations between Moscow and Baku and the desire of the latter not to ruin bilateral relations between the two countries. The spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Khazar Ibrahim told journalists on August 8, however, that “Azerbaijan favors the solution of the South Ossetia conflict based on the territorial integrity of Georgia and Georgian adherence to international law” (www.day.az).

    On August 11, ANS TV reported that 50 Azerbaijanis had gathered in Georgia’s Azerbaijani-populated provinces to go to the war for the defense of their country. It is noteworthy that Russians have bombed Azerbaijani populated areas of Georgia for three days in a row, killing four and wounding dozens. The possibility is not excluded that this was done in hopes of fomenting strife between Azeris and Georgians.

    The present situation in Georgia presents huge security concerns for official Baku. If Russia manages to squeeze Georgia, then it would put an end to the economic independence of Azerbaijan as well. Many analysts in Baku believe that the real purpose of the pressure on Georgia is the Kremlin’s desire to control Azerbaijan.

    Thus, it is vital for Azerbaijan to provide all necessary assistance to its strategic ally. Considering the political realities between Baku and Moscow, it is unlikely that the Azerbaijani government will provide any military assistance to Georgia. Economic and humanitarian assistance, however, is definitely an option. Azerbaijan remains the only viable international outlet for Georgia, and many Georgians have already started using the territory of Azerbaijan to travel abroad.

    Azerbaijani political analysts believe that the war in Georgia is a long-term loss for the Kremlin. By showing its neo-imperialist face, Russia may have lost the Caucasus forever. The political analyst Ilgar Mammadov says that “If Georgia stays strong for few more days, we will all see the defeat of Russia from the Caucasus.” Another analyst Vugar Seidov says “The departure of Russia from Abkhazia and South Ossetia is historically inevitable” (Regnum, August 10).

  • Surreal scenes: Stranded in istanbul

    Surreal scenes: Stranded in istanbul

    By Tom Clifford, Deputy Managing Editor

    Istanbul: It was a surreal moment. At Istanbul’s modern international airport passengers due to board Turkish Airways flight 1382 to Tbilisi were watching their homes burn on TV news.

    Three families from Georgia had been holidaying in Turkey when Gori was attacked and were desperately trying to get back into Georgia even though they knew that returning to Gori was out of the question. Other families had given up trying to get back and decided to extend their stay in Turkey for as long as their money could last.

    “What choice do we have? We want to get back to Georgia but on Saturday we saw the place where we live had been attacked by Russian jets. We want to get to Tbilisi at least but it doesn’t look good,” they told Gulf News.

  • 1st International Conference of Karamanlidika Studies,University of Cyprus,11-13.09.08

    1st International Conference of Karamanlidika Studies,University of Cyprus,11-13.09.08

    From: Ioannis Grigoriadis
    List Editor: Mark Stein
    Editor’s Subject: H-TURK: 1st International Conference of Karamanlidika Studies,University of Cyprus,11-13.09.08 [I Grigoriadis]
    Author’s Subject: H-TURK: 1st International Conference of Karamanlidika Studies,University of Cyprus,11-13.09.08 [I Grigoriadis]
    Date Written: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:33:02 -0400
    Date Posted: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:33:02 -0400

    The 1st International Conference of Karamanlidika Studies will be held
    from 11 to 13 September 2008 at the “Axiothea” Cultural Centre of the
    University of Cyprus. It is organised by the Department of Turkish and
    Middle Eastern Studies/University of Cyprus (Nicosia) and the National
    Hellenic Research Foundation (Athens). The Conference brings together
    scholars from Cyprus, Greece, Turkey, Belgium, France, Italy, and Norway
    with the aim to explore the always plural and complex stories of the
    Turkish-speaking Orthodox Christian population and its cultural product,
    the Karamanlidika printed matter.

    Karamanlidhes are the Turkish-speaking Orthodox Christian
    inhabitants of Anatolia, in a geographical area, which is defined today
    as “Cappadocia”, promoted by art history, in the region of the
    troglodytic ecclesiastical and monastic communities of the Byzantine
    Empire. From the mid-nineteenth century until to the Exchange of
    Populations, the term “Cappadocia” was applied to the region that
    reached as far as Yosgat in the north, Karaman in the south, just beyond
    Kayseri in the east and no further than Isparta in the west.

    In the early eighteenth century the Ecumenical Patriarchate sped to
    protect these Turcophone Orthodox Christians from conversion to Islam,
    and some one hundred years later, from the proselytisation of
    Protestants and other missionaries. The appeal of the propaganda of the
    various Western Churches in these populations caused the leadership of
    the Orthodox Church to worry about its flock in Anatolia, and the
    bourgeoisie of Constantinople to deliberate on the unity and the
    stability of their economic networks in the Asia Minor hinterland.
    Metropolitans and monks, such as Zacharias the Athonite and Seraphim of
    Pisidia translated into Turkish and published in Greek characters, that
    is in Karamanlidika, Catechisms, Psalms and other religious texts, with
    the aim of teaching the doctrine of the Orthodox Church and the
    religious duties of an Orthodox Christian to the Christians of Asia
    Minor, “since they have forgotten their Greek language, cannot
    understand what is read in Church and thus are led far from the way of
    God.”

    >From the mid-nineteenth century, expatriate Karamanlis played a
    decisive role in the publication of Karamanli books and, of course, in
    the turn towards the secularization of Karamanli printed works. The
    expatriates bore the expenses, organized and participated in
    disseminating and distributing the books in the interior of Anatolia,
    with subscriptions, because they had a network of mutual support and
    their own active rules of communication. Some clerics, but mainly laymen
    – teachers, doctors, journalists – who had studied in Athens, Izmir and
    Western Europe, supported economically and assumed responsibility for
    processing the material, that is translating works from Greek, but
    mainly from Western languages, or transcribing works from Ottoman script
    into Greek characters. Cappadocians residing in Constantinople and
    others living in their native Anatolia participated in Karamanli book
    production. They translated French novels, vade-mecums on medicine and
    agriculture, manuals on epistolography, legal codes and interpretations
    of laws, calendars and almanacs, as well as composing works on local
    history. The Karamanli book served the needs of the Turcophone Orthodox
    Christian society in the face of the challenges of Tanzimat. Committed
    clergymen in the patriarchal milieu and militant laymen undertook the
    campaign to enlighten the Orthodox Christians of Anatolia. This was
    mainly the circle of Evangelinos Misailidis, publisher of “Anatoli”, the
    Karamanli newspaper with the greatest longevity.

    A document of Ottoman sovereignty, the Karamanli script transmits
    elements of the Ottoman world and of Orthodoxy during the first, the
    pre-national stage of long duration, under the aegis of the Patriarchal
    printing press initially, and with the activity of misorganizations
    subsequently. From the mid-nineteenth century onwards, it
    functioned as a vehicle for transporting cultural goods produced in
    Europe, or, more rarely, it built bridges between the Ottoman world and
    Greek education.

    For more information, please contact the organisers of the conference:

    Matthias Kappler, University of Cyprus / Nicosia (mkappler@ucy.ac.cy)
    and

    Evangelia Balta, National Hellenic Research Foundation / Athens
    (evabalta@eie.gr)

    CONFERENCE PROGRAMME

    Thursday, 11th September 2008

    20.00 Opening Ceremony

    Welcome addresses:

    Anastasia Nikolopoulou (Dean School of Humanities)

    Martin Strohmeier (Chairman Department of Turkish and Middle Eastern
    Studies)

    Evangelia Balta

    Introductory speech

    Thomas Korovinis & Ensemble, Salonika

    Greek and Turkish Songs from Cappadocia

    A reception will follow

    Friday, 12th September 2008

    Chairperson: Evangelia Balta

    10.00 Aspects of History

    Christos Hadziiossif, University of Crete & Institute for Mediterranean
    Studies / Rethymno

    The Ambivalence of Turkish in a Greek-speaking community of Central
    Anatolia

    Irini Renieri, Institute for Mediterranean Studies / Rethymno

    ‘Xenophone Nevşehirlis… Greek-souled Neapolitans’: the persistent yet
    hesitant dissemination of the Greek language in the Turcophone
    environment of Nevşehir

    Anna Ballian, Benaki Museum of Islamic Art / Athens

    Villages, churches and silver liturgical vessels: the case of Karamanlı
    patronage in the 18th-19th c.

    11.30 Coffee Break

    Chairperson: Martin Strohmeier

    12.00 Aspects of History

    Sia Anagnostopoulou, Panteion University / Athens

    Greek perceptions of the Turkish-speaking Cappadocians: the Greek
    diplomatic sources

    Stefo & Foti Benlisoy, Istanbul Technical University & Boğaziçi
    University / Istanbul

    Reading the identity of Karamanlides through the pages of Anatoli

    Şehnaz Şişmanoğlu, Sabancı University/ Istanbul

    The Anatoli newspaper: the heyday of the Karamanlı press

    Michalis Michail, University of Cyprus / Nicosia

    >From Cilicia to Cyprus: Turcophone Orthodox pilgrims during the Ottoman
    period

    14.00 Lunch

    Friday, 12th September 2008

    Chairperson: Christos Hadziiossif

    16.00 Sources

    Giampiero Bellingeri, University Ca’ Foscari / Venice

    Venetian sources and significations of ‘Caramania’

    Ioannis Theocharidis, University of Cyprus / Nicosia

    Unexploited sources on Serafeim Pissidios

    Stavros Anestidis, Centre for Asia Minor Studies / Athens

    The Centre for Asia Minor Studies and books printed in Karamanlı. A
    contribution to the compilation and the bibliography of a significant
    literature

    Saturday, 13th September

    Chairperson: Giampiero Bellingeri

    09.00 Literature

    Johann Strauss, University Marc Bloch / Strasbourg

    Karamanlı literature – part of a ‘Christian Turkish literature’?

    Anthi Karra, Brussels

    >From Polypathis to Temaşa-i Dünya, from the safe port of translation to
    the open sea of creation….

    Julia Chatzipanagioti-Sangmeister & Matthias Kappler, University of
    Cyprus / Nicosia

    Thoughts on the Turkish verses in Phanariote anthologies (1750-1821)

    M. Sabri Koz, Yapı ve Kredi Yayınları / Istanbul

    Türk Halk Hikâyelerinin Karamanlıca Baskıları Üzerine
    Karşılaştırmalı
    Bibliyografik Notlar / Comparing bibliographical notes on Karamanlı
    prints of Turkish folk tales

    11.00 Coffee Break

    Chairperson: Matthias Kappler

    11.30 Linguistic Topics

    Eftychios Gavriel, University of Cyprus / Nicosia

    Τranscription Problems of Karamanlidika texts

    Bernt Brendemoen, University of Oslo

    An 18th century Karamanlidic codex from Soumela Monastery in Trabzon

    Ceyda Arslan Kechriotis, Boğaziçi University / Istanbul

    Some syntactic issues in Karamanlidika texts

    Xavier Luffin, Université Libre / Brussels

    Religious vocabulary in Karamanlidika 13.30 Concluding Discussion –
    Prospects

  • Timeline by 12th of August From the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia

    Timeline by 12th of August From the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia

    12 August

    10:15 Russian planes bombed Gori. The territory around administration building and city market have been bombed.

    In the morning ours of 12 August Russian airplanes bombed the village of Tkviavi near Tskhinvali once again.

    03:25 Russian envoy to the UN Churkin announced on the press conference that Russia will not support the resolution. Georgian envoy Alasania announced that suggested resolution is acceptable to Georgia.

    02:15 Emergency meeting of the Security Council of the UN started. The resolution about cease-fire prepared by France was discussed. (more…)

  • Bush Warns Russia to Reverse Course in Georgia

    Bush Warns Russia to Reverse Course in Georgia

    US President George W. Bush made a statement about the situation in Georgia. Bush is demanding Russia withdraw from Georgia saying that such Russia’s actions are unacceptable in 21st century.

    “Russia has invaded a sovereign neighboring state and threatens a democratic government elected by its people, ” said Bush.

    “Russia’s actions this week have raised serious questions about its intentions in Georgia and the region. These actions have substantially damaged Russia’s standing in the world. And these actions jeopardize Russians’ relations — Russia’s relations with the United States and Europe. It is time for Russia to be true to its word and to act to end this crisis,” said US President.

    He said he was “deeply conerned” that Russian troops had moved beyond the zone of conflict.

    “There’s evidence that Russian forces may soon begin bombing the civilian airport in the capital city,” he said. “If these reports are accurate, these Russian actions would represent a dramatic and brutal escalation of the conflict in Georgia. And these actions would be inconsistent with assurances we have received from Russia that its objectives were limited to restoring the status quo in South Ossetia that existed before fighting began on August the 6th,”

    He calls upon Russia to reverse the course and respect Georgia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. He also told Russia to accept the peace agreement.

    “Russia’s government must respect Georgia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. The Russian government must reverse the course it appears to be on, and accept this peace agreement as a first step toward resolving this conflict,” he said.

  • STATEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF GEORGIA

    STATEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF GEORGIA

    Russian occupation forces have already gone beyond the conflict zone. Until recently Russia limited itself to aerial assaults outside of the boundaries of the conflict zone, however, now the Russian forces are attempting to seize the control of entire Georgia.  Russian regular army is located in Zugdidi, Khobi and Senaki. Also, numerous Russian troops moved beyond Tskhinvali region, blocked the major highway and headed towards the capital of Georgia (Tbilisi). All of this happened following Georgian Government’s unilateral declaration of ceasefire, regroupment of Georgian troops outside of the conflict zone and, finally, the signing of the document prepared by Foreign Ministers of Finland, France and Georgia regarding unconditional ceasefire. Until this very moment the Georgian Government was and continues to fulfill the terms of the abovementioned document. Throughout the night and following the unilateral ceasefire, the Russian jets continued the bombardment of capital of Georgia, Tbilisi, and other cities and villages. Only within one night more than 10 assaults have been carried out, which resulted in the damage of civil aviation radar system, civil aviation telecom system, residential buildings, as well as, road infrastructure. Then, Russian “peace keepers”, in violation of their mandate and international standards, entered Zugdidi region, occupied Police and other administrative buildings and started “patrolling” Western part of Georgia. All of the abovementioned, suggests that the Russian actions have nothing to do with the enforcement of peace and that it was all pre-planned strategy aimed at conquering Georgia.

    Today the statehood of Georgia is in great danger, and, thereby, leaving existing world order in uncertainty. We appeal to the world community to stop the Russian aggression and assume the responsibility for the developments in the region.