Category: Europe

  • Strategic Focus on Turkey Project (SFT)

    Strategic Focus on Turkey Project (SFT)

    This project is designed to adopt a distinctive approach on Turkey. Most of the research and policy work undertaken on Turkey in the US and Europe concentrates either on the complications for bilateral US-Turkey relations of the US intervention in Iraq, or on Turkey’s internal economic and political developments and their impact on the negotiations over Turkey’s accession to the European Union (EU).

    The dimension that appears to receive far less attention in current policy and contemporary academic discussions is Turkey’s pivotal geo-political and geo-economic position and, therefore, the impacts that Turkish policies will likely have upon the long-term stability and prosperity of the region that surrounds it.

    In essence, Turkey is assessed currently in the US within the prism of Iraq and in many European capitals only as a problem that the EU needs to confront. A better understanding of how Turkey can help deal with some of the biggest geo-political and geo-economic challenges facing the US, EU and beyond will assist in building a more sophisticated comprehension of Turkey’s role as a constructive partner to the US, the EU member states and other countries.

    Doğan Holding, one of Turkey’s preeminent business groups, is generously supporting this project.

    Areas of focus for SFT:

    • Turkey’s role in the Middle East
    • Turkey’s role in establishing a diversified set of energy options for the EU
    • Turkey’s role in the economic development and regional integration of the Black Sea area
    • Turkey’s relationships with the Caucasus and Central Asia and political stability in the region
    • Turkey’s contributions to EU and NATO-led peace-keeping missions and other security operations
    • Turkey’s role as a magnet for Foreign Direct Investment and as a growing investor regionally

    Advisory Board

    Chatham House is forming an Advisory Board for the project. This will be composed of individuals with extensive experience and expertise from international affairs, media, civil society and business. The Board’s purpose is to provide long-term guidance to the project.

    SFT Contact

    The Strategic Focus on Turkey Project is run by Fadi Hakura, Associate Fellow at Chatham House. If you would like to find out more about the project, please contact:

    Fadi Hakura
    +44 (0)7970 172541
    Email Fadi Hakura

  • Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire

    Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire

    Posted by: Marlene Laruelle <[email protected]>

    Marlène Laruelle.
    Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire
    Washington, D.C., Woodrow Wilson Press/Johns Hopkins University Press,
    2008, 288 p.

    Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia has been
    marginalized at the edge of a Western-dominated political and economic
    system. In recent years, however, leading Russian figures, including
    former president Vladimir Putin, have begun to stress a geopolitics
    that puts Russia at the center of a number of axes: European-Asian,
    Christian-Muslim-Buddhist, Mediterranean-Indian, Slavic-Turkic, and so
    on. This volume examines the political presuppositions and expanding
    intellectual impact of Eurasianism, a movement promoting an ideology
    of Russian-Asian greatness, which has begun to take hold throughout
    Russia, Kazakhstan, and Turkey. Eurasianism purports to tell Russians
    what is unalterably important about them and why it can only be
    expressed in an empire. Using a wide range of sources, Marl? Laruelle
    discusses the impact of the ideology of Eurasianism on geopolitics,
    interior policy, foreign policy, and culturalist philosophy.

    Marlène Laruelle is currently a research fellow at the Central Asia
    and Caucasus Institute of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced
    International Studies at the Johns Hopkins University. She has been a
    postdoctoral fellow at the French Institute for Central Asia Studies
    in Tashkent and a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center
    for Scholars
    . In Paris, she is an associate scholar at the French
    Center for Russian, Caucasian, and East-European Studies at the School
    of Advanced Social Sciences Studies.

    Contents:

    Introduction: Eurasianism – Marginal or Mainstream in Contemporary Russia?

    The Historical Roots of the Eurasianist Idea
    Neo-Eurasianism and Its Place in Post-Soviet Russia
    Marginal or “Mainstream”?
    Premises of This Study

    1. Early Eurasianism, 19201930

    The Life and Death of a Current of Thought
    A Philosophy of Politics
    A Geographic Ideology
    An Ambiguous Orientalism
    Conclusions

    2. Lev Gumilev’s A Theory of Ethnicity?

    >From Dissidence to Public Endorsement:
    An Atypical Biography
    “The Last Eurasianist”?
    Gumilev’s Episteme: Subjecting the Humanities to the Natural Sciences
    Theories of the Ethnos or Naturalistic Determinism
    The Complex History of the Eurasian Totality
    Xenophobia, Mixophobia, and Anti-Semitism
    Gumilev, Russian Nationalism, and Soviet Ethnology
    Conclusions

    3. Aleksandr Panarin: Philosophy of History and the Revival of Culturalism

    Is There a Unified Neo-Eurasianist Theory?
    >From Liberalism to Conservatism: Panarin’s Intellectual Biography
    “Civilizationism” and “Postmodernism”
    Rehabilitating Empire: “Civilizational” Pluralism and Ecumenical Theocracy
    Highlighting Russia’s “Internal East”
    Conclusions

    4. Aleksandr Dugin: A Russian Version of the European Radical Right?

    Dugin’s Social Trajectory and Its Significance
    A Russian Version of Antiglobalism: Dugin’s Geopolitical Theories
    Traditionalism as the Foundation of Dugins Thought
    The Russian Proponent of the New Right?
    Fascism, Conservative Revolution, and National Bolshevism
    A Veiled Anti-Semitism
    Ethno-Differentialism and the Idea of Russian Distinctiveness
    Conclusions

    5. The View from “Within”: Non-Russian Neo-Eurasianism and Islam

    The Emergence of Muslim Eurasianist Political Parties
    The Eurasianist Games of the Russian Muftiates
    Tatarstan: The Pragmatic Eurasianism of Russia’s “Ethnic” Regions
    Conclusions

    6. Neo-Eurasianism in Kazakhstan and Turkey

    Kazakhstan: Eurasianism in Power
    The Turkish Case: On the Confusion between Turkism, Pan-Turkism, and
       Eurasianism

    Conclusion: The Evolution of the Eurasian(ist) Idea in the Twentieth Century

    The Unity of Eurasianism
    Organicism at the Service of Authoritarianism: “Revolution” or “Conservatism”?
    Nationalism: Veiled or Openly Espoused: The Cultural Racism of Eurasianism
    Science, Political Movement, or Think Tank?
    Is Eurasianism Relevant to Explanations of Contemporary Geopolitical Change?
    Psychological Compensation or Part of a Global Phenomenon

    Notes
    Bibliography
    Index

  • Turkey’s widening diplomatic horizons

    Turkey’s widening diplomatic horizons

    Long before Turkey sought to join the European Union, the European powers were eager to penetrate deep into Turkey’s hinterland.

    On the eastern side of the Bosphorus, maybe just 20 steps into Asia, stands one of the finest relics of this failed imperial ambition.

    Hydarpasha railway station was designed by two German architects Otto Ritter and Helmut Conu in the neo-renaissance style. That at least is what the guidebooks tell you.

    The building sits astride the end of the platforms with a tower at each of its front corners looking for all the world like some provincial German town hall.

    The stone is dirty. The whole edifice slightly decaying. But once inside the vaulted ticket office, there is no doubting the grandeur of the enterprise of which this was the westernmost gateway.

    BBC NEWS | Programmes | From Our Own Correspondent | Turkey’s widening diplomatic horizons

  • Consent of Armenia to Participate in Turkish Project is Positive Trend

    Consent of Armenia to Participate in Turkish Project is Positive Trend

    29.09.08 13:15Azerbaijan, Baku, 27 September /corr. Trend News E.Tariverdiyeva / Consent of Armenia to participate in the Turkish project “Platform of security and stability in Caucasus” is a positive trend for discussions over many disputable questions in the Caucasus region. However, the opinions of political scientists do not conver the question of the solution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict with the help of the Turkish initiative.

    “It is very important that the Armenian leadership is more opened to the Turkish role in the region and this is positive changes, which now occur,” American expert on Caucasus, Svante Cornell, told TrendNews by telephone from Stockholm.

    At the meeting in New York on 26 September, the Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia supported Turkish initiative to establish “Platform of security and stability in Caucasus”, Foreign Minister of Turkey, Ali Babajan, told CNN Turk television.

    “Negotiations in format of troika will be continued further. There is real desire of the authorities of the two states to solve the Nagorno-Karabakh problem,” said the diplomat.

    In mid September, Russia and Turkey began realization of plan with regards to establishment of “Platform of security and stability in Caucasus” for five countries – Azerbaijan, Russia, Georgia, Turkey and Armenia. The aspiration of Turkey for the prompt solution of the territorial conflicts in Caucasus between Armenia and Turkey, and between Armenia and Azerbaijan was the purpose of the creation of this platform.

    Observers consider that the consent of Armenia to participate in the Turkish initiative is the first step to the beginning of constructive talks on the problems in the region.

    The European Commission considers that Turkey could make a contribution to the solution of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.

     

    “Turkish initiative to establish “Platform of security and stability in Caucasus” is very interesting, and it can contribute to the solution of conflicts in this region,” the Head of the Diplomatic Mission of the European Commission to Azerbaijan, Alan Waddams, told TrendNews .

    The proposal of Turkey is interesting and should be considered, he said.

    “I believe that with the initiative of Turkey, the OSCE Minsk Group can achieve solution of protracted conflicts,” the diplomats said.

    The conflict between the two countries of South Caucasus began in 1988 due to territorial claims by Armenia against Azerbaijan. Armenia has occupied 20% of the Azerbaijani land including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and its seven surrounding Districts. Since 1992, these territories have been under the occupation of the Armenian Forces. In 1994, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement at which time the active hostilities ended. The Co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (Russia, France and USA) are currently holding peaceful negotiations.

    The Azerbaijan side hopes for Turkish initiative in the solution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

    “It is completely possible that after the visit of the Turkish President to Yerevan, Armenia will also participate in the establishment of peace and stability in Caucasus,” member of Azerbaijani delegation to PACE, MP Aydin Mirzazade, said.

    This means the new way of Armenian policy, and in the near future, it is completely possible that we will observe changes in the policy of Armenia, he said.

    “Azerbaijan, as state close to Turkey, and Armenia, which wants to establish relations with Turkey, helped Turkey and gave worthy assessment to its initiative, which is no longer pointless talk and proposal in air,” Mikhail Remizov, President of Russian Institute of National Strategy, told TrendNews.

    However, the political scientist does not consider this decision of Armenia and Azerbaijan in linkage to the Karabakh conflict. “I do not here see the Karabakh theme, with exception of the fact that in the case of creating this format, this will be favorable for discussion of similar questions,” he said.

    Turkish political scientist Arif Keskin does not believe in the success of platform, proposed by Turkey, in the Karabakh problem solution.

    “Talks with the mediation of Turkey can at best lead to the liberation of Azerbaijani regions around Karabakh, which will make a Karabakh problem even more difficult,” representative of Eurasian Research Strategic Center (Ankara), Keskin, told Trend News by telephone.

    American expert on Caucasus Cornell connects further solution of the conflict with the actions of Russia.

    According to him, the conflict will not be resolved unless there are serious signals that Russia is inclined to the peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

    “In the present situation, when Russia became stronger in the region, and the West is weaker, it would be good be see changes in the direction of the solution of conflict in Karabakh,” Cornell, Research Director of Central Asia-Caucasus Institute at Johns Hopkins University, told TrendNews by telephone.

    E.Ostapenko (Baku), B.Hasanov (Baku), I.Alizade (Baku) and R.Agayev (Moscow) attended the preparation of the material.

    The correspondent can be contacted at: [email protected]

  • Cypriot president seeks end to military exercises

    Cypriot president seeks end to military exercises

    STRASBOURG, France: President Dimitris Christofias of Cyprus urged the U.N. and Turkish Cypriot leaders on Tuesday to support his call to abolish annual military exercises and to demilitarize Cyprus’ divided capital city.

    Christofias said the moves would “improve the climate” and increase the chances of success in reunification talks with his Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat.

    The island of Cyprus has been divided since 1974, when Turkey invaded in response to a coup aimed at uniting the island with Greece. Turkey keeps 35,000 troops in the breakaway Turkish Cypriot north, and a small number of Greek troops are stationed in the south. A U.N.-patrolled buffer zone separates the two communities.

    Cypriot president seeks end to military exercises – International Herald Tribune.

  • EU agrees on 4.5 bln euro aid for candidate states

    EU agrees on 4.5 bln euro aid for candidate states

    BRUSSELS, Sept 29 (Reuters) – The European Union’s executive arm agreed on Monday how to spend 4.5 billion euros ($6.5 billion) in aid to the bloc’s candidate countries in 2008-10, giving priority to improving governance and the rule of law.

    The European Commission’s decision brings closer the release of the EU funds to Croatia, Turkey, Macedonia, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia and Kosovo.

    ‘The road towards the EU is paved with reforms to improve the everyday lives of citizens and to comply with the strict EU accession criteria,’ EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn said in a statement.

    The Commission said the 1.8 billion euros of aid for Turkey would focus on supporting the stability of institutions so as to guarantee fundamental rights and freedoms, democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for minorities.

    EU agrees on 4.5 bln euro aid for candidate states – Forbes.com.