Category: UK

  • An expanded Europe will benefit Britain

    An expanded Europe will benefit Britain

    Maintaining the momentum of EU accession, particularly in the western Balkans and Turkey, will strengthen the UK economycaroline flint LABOUR PARTY CONFERENCE 2008

    Five years ago the European Union expanded overnight, extending its boundaries to include 12 new members and 104 million more citizens. But not everyone was rejoicing. Euro-sceptics claimed that the EU’s influence would be too great – or maybe too small. Some panicked that millions of new EU citizens would swamp our labour market. Others feared that weaker economies would suck the funding away from the richer EU members. Many doubted that with so many voices around the table, anything would ever get done.

    Five years on, it’s clear that those sceptics were wrong. The EU is stronger for being broader: an expanded EU has vastly increased trading opportunities for British business, has increased security at home and in our neighbourhood and has weakened the case for creating a European super state.

    But making the case for further enlargement and more free movement is undoubtedly more difficult in a recession, when unemployment is rising and pressure on public services intense.

    We need to recognise that people’s perceptions of enlargement are not clear-cut. People have genuine fears over crime, job losses and over-crowded communities. But it’s important to separate myth from fact, to recognise what has gone right and to put forward the case for maintaining the momentum of EU accession, particularly in the western Balkans, but also in Turkey – a view echoed by the US president Barack Obama during his recent visit there.

    The case for further enlargement rests on more than the figures charting increased growth and trade flows, important though these are to the British economy. We need to be clear too about the benefits to regional stability and security, particularly at a time when crime increasingly knows no borders.

    Enlargement has transformed the countries of eastern Europe after decades of communism: anchoring democracy and market based economic systems; and promoting social progress and human rights.

    We should continue to take forward Turkey’s accession negotiations, too. Turkey is a country of huge economic potential and its position at the crossroads of Europe makes it a logical transit route for energy from both the Middle East and Central Asia, and a key force for stability and prosperity in the region. It’s in our interests to see the EU’s shared values and common standards grow beyond our current boundaries and extend, for the first time, to a majority Muslim country.

    Enlargement brings risks and it hasn’t always been easy. Joining the EU is not, nor should it be, a walk in the park. Back in the 1970s, the UK’s application for membership was rejected twice. Not so long ago, people railed when Spain and Greece applied to join.

    But we have shown in the past and we’ll show again in the future that we can manage the risks by setting rigorous standards: on fighting crime and corruption; on respect for human rights; by ensuring that countries that join the EU have the political and economic structures to cope and are in a position to contribute to the strength of the union.

    The future of Europe is yet to be written but it’s clear to me that the UK’s interests lie in seeing a union that moves forwards and outwards: one that delivers growth in the UK and a powerful platform for negotiating with other countries on issues that matter to British people. An expanded Europe will help deliver both these aims.

    guardian.co.uk, Friday 1 May 2009

  • Turkish Lira fourth most popular currency as holidaymakers shun eurozone

    Turkish Lira fourth most popular currency as holidaymakers shun eurozone

    The Turkish Lira has become the fourth most popular currency at the country’s leading bureaux de change, as British holidaymakers start to desert the increasingly-expensive Eurozone.

    By Harry Wallop, Consumer Affairs Editor
    Last Updated: 5:51PM BST 21 Apr 2009

     The Lira was the fourth most popular currency last year, behind the euro, dollar and Australian dollar  Photo: GETTY
    The Lira was the fourth most popular currency last year, behind the euro, dollar and Australian dollar Photo: GETTY

    According to the Post Office, which changes £1 in every £3 that holidaymakers take overseas, the demand for Turkish Lira increased by 21 per cent last year and is on course to grow again this year.

    Last year it overtook the Canadian Dollar to become the fourth most popular currency and if its current popularity continues it could overtake the Australian dollar to reach the third spot by the end of this year.

    The popularity of the currency is the latest evidence to suggest destinations in the Eurozone, such as Spain and Italy, have fallen out of favour with holidaymakers because of the collapse in the value of the pound.

    A year ago £1 would have bought €1.27. Though it has improved greatly over the last month from a low of €1.03, it only buys €1.13 this week.

    In contrast the Lira has remained stable at about £1 to 2.40 Turkish Lira over the course of the last 12 months.

    OAG, a research company which monitors passenger numbers around the world, indicated that the number of passengers leaving the UK in the first three months of this year fell by 10.5 per cent, with 5.28 million fewer seats filled than a year ago.

    Most of this slump has been driven by a sharp fall in trips to Europe. The Civil Aviation Authority said traffic between Heathrow and the Eurozone had fallen by 8.7 per cent, while traffic to other destinations was up by 1.8 per cent.

    Turkey has emerged as one of the winners, offering holidaymakers a range of cheap hotel rooms, combined with the promise of low priced meals, drink and trips.

    Sarah Munro, head of travel at the Post Office, said: “We have seen unprecedented demand for lira over the past year. Turkey is still cheaper than anywhere in the eurozone.

    “The strength of the euro compared with the weakness of the Turkish lira against sterling is obviously having an impact and 2009 sales to date suggest another growth year for Turkey. That is why we are extending our over the counter service for Turkish lira from 1,400 to 4,000 Post Office branches.”

    Previously customers needed to order Lira in advance if they wanted to change money at the great majority of Post Offices.

    The Lira was the fourth most popular currency last year, behind the euro, dollar and Australian dollar.

    So far this year, demand has increased by 9 per cent, compared with last year. The Lira is expected to overtake the Australian dollar to become the third most popular currency.

    Source:  www.telegraph.co.uk, England, 21 Apr 2009

    [2]

    Cash boost for Turkish sunseekers

    THE Post Office has more than doubled the number of branches where Turkish lira can be bought over the counter.

    The move comes as or holiday bookings to this summer’s most popular foreign destination continues to grow.

    After seeing double-digit growth in demand for lira over the past two months compared with a year ago, 12 Post Office branches in Lanarkshire are part of 4000 Post Office bureau de change branches in the UK offering instant currency on the spot.

    Until mid-May, customers buying Turkish lira will benefit from a special deal offering an exclusive exchange rate daily without imposing any minimum spend conditions.

    The move comes after the Post Office reported a 21% increase in sales of Turkish lira in 2008.

    The Post Office warns people planning travel to Turkey to watch the exchange rate movements carefully as the lira has proved more volatile than most currencies.

    Source: Glasgow Evening Times, Scotland, 24/04/09

  • Servants, Not Masters

    Servants, Not Masters

    g201

    Nick Hardwick, chairman of the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), will appear before the Home Affairs Select Committee as the fallout surrounding allegations into the use of force at the protests grows increasingly acrimonious.

    Mr Hardwick said he had “serious concerns” about front-line supervision of officers at this month’s demonstrations in the City of London and said police needed to remember that they were “servants, not masters” of the people.

    Mr Hardwick’s comments came as former Metropolitan Police Commander John O’Connor, warned that current Met chief, Sir Paul Stephenson, risks losing the support of rank and file officers if the investigation into allegations of abuse became a “witch hunt.”

    So far almost 90 complaints have been made about the use of force at the G20 protests.

    The IPCC launched its third investigation into police tactics on Saturday after a 23-year-old London man claimed he was assaulted by a Met Police officer.

    The commission is already investigating events leading up to the death of newspaper seller Ian Tomlinson on April 1, and an allegation of an assault on Nicola Fisher at a vigil for Mr Tomlinson on April 2.

    Keith Vaz, the Labour chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said MPs would examine the controversial “kettling” tactic used to contain demonstrators.

    An IPCC spokesman said more than 185 complaints had been received relating to G20 of which almost 90 were from alleged victims of – or witnesses to – excessive police force.

    Other footage of a riot officer apparently hitting a protester with a riot shield has also been published and is being examined by Scotland Yard.

    The Met Police said it was also looking at video footage posted on Saturday on YouTube by the Climate Camp group which shows another man apparently being punched in the face by a police officer.

    ITN

  • Police chief, Bob Quick, resigns over terror blunder

    Police chief, Bob Quick, resigns over terror blunder

    Michael Evans, Defence Editor, and Russell Jenkins

    Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorism chief has resigned today after accidentally revealing a briefing document detailing a counterterrorist operation against al-Qaeda suspects in the UK.

    Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, said he had accepted the resignation of Bob Quick, with “great reluctance and sadness”.He will be replaced by Assistant Commissioner John Yates.

    A huge MI5 and police counterterrorist operation against the suspects had to be brought forward at short notice last night because of the blunder.

    Twelve people were arrested, ten of them born in Pakistan, at eight separate addresses after a long covert surveillance operation involving MI5 and police from the North West Counter-Terrorism Unit was compromised.

    Senior sources believe that there were plans to attack the Birdcage nightclub in Manchester city centre or the Trafford Centre shopping complex. The nightclub, which hosts cabaret and dancing showgirls, attracts thousands of people each week.

    Detectives believe that the venue, near The Printworks entertainment complex, was being targeted as a “symbol of Western decadence”. The Trafford Centre in Manchester attracts 140,000 shoppers each weekend.

    The operation was nearly blown when Mr Quick walked up Downing Street holding a document marked “secret” with highly sensitive operational details visible to photographers.

    The document, carried under his arm, revealed how many terrorist suspects were to be arrested, in which cities across the North West.

    It revealed that armed members of the Greater Manchester Police would force entry into a number of homes. The operation’s secret code headed the list of action that was to take place.

    The assistant commissioner had been scheduled to see the Prime Minister and Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, about police reform in his capacity as a member of the Association of Chief Police Officers, but the document indicated that he was planning to outline to Gordon Brown that police raids were imminent.

    As soon as the photograph was circulated, MI5 and Scotland Yard took immediate steps to stop its publication, fearing that even a reference to Mr Quick’s arrival in Downing Street might tip off the suspects.

    A rare D-notice — guidance issued from the Ministry of Defence to safeguard issues of national security — was slapped on media organisations.

    However, the photograph of the document had already been distributed abroad, where the D-notice system carries no weight. Getty Images, which took the photograph, agreed to take it off its website, but foreign media organisations that have contracts with Getty had already received the picture, along with every national newspaper in Britain. A Californian magazine also had the picture.

    Frantic discussions took place between the police and MI5 and a decision was taken to bring forward the raids from 2am to 5pm.

    As newspapers mulled over the contents of the D-notice, police officers from the terrorism unit, supported by officers from Greater Manchester, Merseyside and Lancashire, carried out a series of moves. Instead of a planned operation in the early hours, the armed police had to swoop on the addresses while it was still light.

    A senior officer said: “This was a massive compromise of the whole operation.”

    Last night Mr Quick apologised to Sir Paul Stephenson, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, for the security blunder that nearly put paid to months of surveillance work.

    A Scotland Yard spokesman said: “Assistant Commissioner Quick accepts he made a mistake on leaving a sensitive document on open view and deeply regrets it.”

    The arrests appear to have foiled a major terrorist plot. Senior detectives said that there was an “imminent and credible” threat of an atrocity by an al-Qaeda-linked group.

    One officer said: “These are the most significant arrests for some time. There was information which led us to believe that these men were planning something major. It was not clear when or where they would strike, but they were collecting material for a large explosion. We are talking about something big.”

    Two men were arrested at a house on Galsworthy Avenue in Cheetham Hill, Manchester, two at a premises on Cheetham Hill Road, one on the M602, three at Cedar Grove in Merseyside, one near Liverpool John Moores University, one on Earle Road in the Wavertree area of Liverpool, and two at a Homebase store in Clitheroe. The suspects included a teenager and a man aged 41.

    Mesu Raza, an unemployed man from Pakistan who lives in a flat above Cyber Net Café, said: “I saw police arrest two people. There were a large number of police vans.”

    Witnesses to the arrests on Galsworthy Avenue said that the two men tried to make a run for it.

    Bushra Majid, 33, a mother of four and Urdu-speaker, said that she recognised the men as speaking Pashtun, a dialect from Afghanistan.

    She said: “Six or seven men used to live there and every day they went to the al-Falah mosque [an Islamic centre on Haywood Street].” She said that the men were aged between 25 and 50. She said there were lots of people coming and going all the time.

    At about 5pm she opened the door after hearing noises and saw police dragging a man without shoes along the pavement. She said the men arrested were “darker and had longer beards” than the predominantly Pakistani population in the area.

    A woman living near the Cheetham Hill house where three men were taken away told the BBC: “They were just nice neighbours, not noisy, never did anything to disturb anybody.”

    Police have also sealed off a terrace of properties in Earle Road in the Wavertree area of Liverpool and witnesses said a man was arrested at a flat above a shop just before 5pm.

    Witnesses at Liverpool John Moores University said that two Asian men in their mid to late twenties were held by armed police outside the main library. Greater Manchester Police said that just one man was arrested there.

    Craig Ahmed, 24, a business student from Maghull, Merseyside, said: “There was all shouting and commotion outside so I went to the window and saw about eight police officers. One of them was armed and was pointing his gun at two men who were ordered to lie face down on the ground.

    “For about half an hour they held the men on the floor. The police were shouting things at them but I couldn’t hear what was being said. They looked like students. One was wearing tracksuit bottoms and a hooded top and the other had a Puffa-style jacket on.

    “The police searched a satchel belonging to one of the men and a carrier bag belonging to the other one. The two men were then searched as they were on the ground and cuffed and taken away.”

    Police also removed evidence from a Homebase DIY store in Clitheroe.

    It is the second time in recent months that Mr Quick has had to apologise. He was the officer who ordered the arrest of Damian Green, the Shadow Immigration Minister, in November, after an investigation into leaks of Home Office information by a civil servant to the Conservative Party. He later accused “the Tory machinery” of undermining his investigation. He had to apologise after the Tories denied his accusation of dirty tricks.

    Cheetham Hill has been the centre of terror investigations before. In November 2007, Abdul Rahman, 25, from Pakistan, became the first person in Britain to be convicted of disseminating terrorist information. He ran a cell largely based at a council house in Cheetham Hill. He recruited young Muslim men for a “holy war” against coalition forces in Afghanistan.

    Source: www.timesonline.co.uk, April 9, 2009

  • EU must not shut the door

    EU must not shut the door

    Ankara is not yet ready, but the benefits of such a union would be great

    [Leading Article]

    Tuesday, 7 April 2009

    Barack Obama yesterday wrote in the visitors’ book at the mausoleum of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk of his hope to strengthen relations between Turkey and America. But, judging by Mr Obama’s speech the previous day, what the US President wants just as much is a strengthening of relations between Turkey and the European Union. The second wish is, by some distance, the more controversial.

    Mr Obama’s unambiguous expression of support for Turkey’s bid for EU membership in Prague on Sunday did not go down well in Paris or Berlin. The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, and the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, were quick to pour cold water on the idea that this predominantly Muslim nation of some 80 million citizens is destined to enter the European family.

    It was unwise for President Obama, as an outsider, to wade into such rough waters. And Washington cannot easily gloss over the fact that Turkey has made little progress towards fulfilling the criteria of entry since the EU agreed to open accession talks with Ankara five years ago.

    It is true that Turkey’s Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has tried to inject some life into the process in recent months, travelling to Brussels for talks with the EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso and appointing a close aide to be full-time negotiator on accession.

    But the reforms Ankara needs to enact to prepare Turkey for EU membership remain on the shelf. The influence of the military within Turkey’s political institutions is still strong. Prosecutions against those deemed to have “insulted Turkishness” continue to be brought. And Ankara refuses to open Turkey’s ports and airports to traffic from Cyprus.

    There are doubts about the ruling AKP party too. The Turkish prime minister’s objections in recent days to the appointment of Anders Fogh Rasmussen as the next secretary general of Nato send an unsettling message about Ankara’s willingness to play politics with religion. The Danish prime minister’s fault in the eyes of Mr Erdogan was his failure to be suitably condemnatory of the offensive cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed published by some of his country’s newspapers in 2006. Turkey’s need to fall back on funding from the International Monetary Fund raises concerns about the ability of the EU to absorb such a potentially unstable new economic partner too.

    And yet Mr Obama was right to emphasise the desirability, in principle, of Turkey entering the European family. Turkish membership would be a tremendous boost for relations between Europe and the Muslim world. At a stroke, the EU would be transformed from looking like a white, Christian club, to an alliance of free-trading democracies.

    And the influence of the mostly moderate Muslims of Turkey might even help to counteract the spread of separatist Islamism in the likes of Britain and the Netherlands. Nor should we forget that the lure of membership gives Europe great scope to push for reform within Turkey, even if the results so far have been less than many hoped for. The process is almost as valuable as the result.

    President Obama might have been a little indelicate in throwing Washington’s full backing behind Ankara’s EU bid, but we should be in no doubt about one thing: it is not in the interests of a single European to see the door slammed in Turkey’s face.

    Source:  www.independent.co.uk, 7 April 2009

  • Pentagon unveils large cuts to defence budget

    Pentagon unveils large cuts to defence budget

    A contract to provide President Obama with a fleet of new helicopters that had been awarded in part to the British company Westland was scrapped last night amid swingeing cuts to the Pentagon’s weapons programmes. 

    Robert Gates, Mr Obama’s Defence Secretary, said he was scrapping the contract to build a new generation of presidential helicopters as part of a “fundamental overhaul” of America’s weapons programmes aimed at cutting costs and scaling back on some of the military’s biggest and most high profile projects.

    Mr Gates also recommended a halt in production of the F-22 fighter jet, part of his new strategy to shift America’s defence priorities away from fighting conventional wars to the newer threats the US faces from insurgents and terrorists in countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan.

    The moves will face stiff resistance on Capitol Hill, where the defence industry has enormous resources and influence and where many congressmen and senators will fiercely defend the military manufacturers in their states because of the jobs they provide.

    Within minutes of Mr Gates’s press conference, and the unveiling of his $534 billion budget proposal, Lockheed Martin, manufacturer of the F-22, warned of the huge layoffs if the fighter jet programme were ended. The defence Secretary said production of the jets, which cost $140 million each, would be halted at 187.

    The contract for a fleet of new “Marine One” presidential helicopters was awarded to the joint Italian/British venture AugustaWestland six years ago. Since then the contract for the VH71 helicopter, a 64ft (19 metre) aircraft that is meant to be able to deflect missiles and resist the electro-magnetic effects of a nuclear blast, has almost doubled in price to $11.2 billion (£7.7 billion), from its original price of $6.1 billion.

    Much of the current fleet of 19 presidential helicopters were built in the 1970s. After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks it was decided that a faster and safer helicopter was needed. But in the current economic crisis, Mr Obama wryly noted last month that his current helicopter seemed “perfectly adequate”.

    The promised emphasis on budget paring is a reversal from the Bush years, which included a doubling of the Pentagon’s spending since 2001. Spending on tanks, fighter planes, ships, missiles and other weapons accounted for about a third of all defence spending last year. But Mr Gates noted more money will be needed in areas such as personnel as the Army and Marines expand the size of their forces.

    Some of the Pentagon’s most expensive programs would also be scaled back. The Army’s $160 billion Future Combat Systems modernisation program would lose its armoured vehicles. Plans to build a shield to defend against missile attacks by rogue states would also be scaled back.

    Yet some programs would grow. Gates proposed speeding up production of the F-35 fighter jet, which could end up costing $1 trillion to manufacture and maintain 2,443 planes. The military would buy more speedy ships that can operate close in to land. And more money would be spent outfitting special forces troops that can hunt down insurgents.

    Source:  TApril 7, 2009