Category: UK

  • ‘British Fritzl’ made daughters pregnant 18 times after shocking failings by social services and police… but no one’s been sacked

    ‘British Fritzl’ made daughters pregnant 18 times after shocking failings by social services and police… but no one’s been sacked

    ‘British Fritzl’ made daughters pregnant 18 times after shocking failings by social services and police… but no one’s been sacked

    Firtzl son

    A father was free to use his daughters as sex slaves for three decades because more than 100 care workers were too scared to stop him, a devastating report revealed yesterday.

    The two sisters suffered more than 1,000 rapes, became pregnant 18 times and had seven children by their perverted father.

    Yet for ten years they were on the Child Protection Register, supposedly being monitored by social services.

    Astonishingly, care workers were aware of repeated allegations of incest but did nothing because they wrongly feared they could be sued for breaching confidentiality.
    The 57-year-old father, who was given 25 life sentences at Sheffield Crown Court in November 2008, ran rings around the authorities by controlling his daughters through fear and moving house 67 times.

    Yesterday a Serious Case Review spelled out a catalogue of shocking failures by 28 separate agencies and more than 100 care workers.

    The ordeal of the sisters and the failure of those supposed to protect them unfolded over 35 years in which:

    • Authorities received 12 reports of physical abuse by the father and seven specific allegations of incest from family members;
    • Sixteen child protection ‘case conferences’ were held and the two sisters were questioned about the paternity of their children 23 times;
    • Proper action by just one of the social workers or other officials including police who knew about the family could have ended the horror;
    • Nothing was done to intervene in part because social workers had a culture of ‘having a quiet word’ rather than taking action.

    But despite the litany of errors nobody was sacked or even disciplined for failing to stop one of the most horrific abuse cases in decades – and all are hidden behind a cloak of anonymity.

    The report states ‘action should have been taken’ in 1997 – when the brother of the victims made allegations of incest to police.

    The case outlined at Sheffield Crown Court was chillingly similar to that of Austrian Josef Fritzl, who kept his daughter locked in a cellar for 24 years and fathered seven children by her.

    n the Sheffield abuse case the father was also violent and domineering.

    Calling himself ‘The Gaffer’, he would drag the girls from their beds and rape them as their mother slept nearby. If they fought, they were beaten, kicked and even held to the flames of a gas fire.

    His campaign of abuse started when the women were aged between eight and ten and he took pleasure in fathering children by his daughters.

    Yesterday the Safeguarding Children Boards of Sheffield and Lincolnshire made a joint apology to the abused women.

    They admitted a ‘collective’ failure but the 39-page executive summary of the case review published yesterday failed to identify anyone involved in the family’s care.

    The review’s author, Professor Pat Cantrill, made it clear that anyone of the 100 care workers could have intervened to stop the abuse.

    ‘It really only needed one person with tenacity to keep pushing this and pushing this and we might have had much earlier action taken,’ she said.

    The father, who cannot be named to protect the sisters’ anonymity, admitted 25 rapes and four indecent assaults between 1980 and 2008, when he was eventually arrested.

    Professor Cantrill condemned the attitude and behaviour of care workers and urged the profession to take her report seriously, commenting: ‘We always don’t seem to learn from these serious case reviews.’

    She said care workers had feared being sued for disclosing confidential or inappropriate information.

    ‘This fed the culture of “having a quiet word”,’ she said. ‘If you don’t put it down on paper then nobody would find themselves in difficulty.’

    She added: ‘There were people in the community who came forward and attempted to get agencies to react in relation to this family and they weren’t listened to as they should.’

    On the question of dealing with allegations of incest she added: ‘Some of the people involved did not know how to handle this sort of case.’

    Last night relatives of the abused girls condemned the authorities’ failure to protect them.

    They told how their own attempts to raise the alarm had even seen them threatened with prosecution for slander.

    ‘This report is shocking because it shows what we said all along – that we had told social services he was abusing his daughters but they did nothing about it,’ said the incestuous father’s sister-in-law.

    ‘It’s disgraceful that they had all this evidence about what was going on in that house but didn’t do anything to protect those girls. That’s meant to be their job, but they didn’t do it.

    ‘Social services are a waste of space as far as I’m concerned – they could have stopped this sooner if they’d done their work properly.

    ‘But they’ve still got their jobs or their pensions so I doubt they’ll be losing any sleep about this report – it can’t affect them now.’

    […]
    The Daily Mail

  • Councils apologise over ‘British Fritzl’ failures

    Councils apologise over ‘British Fritzl’ failures

    Councils, health officials and police yesterday apologised for failing to take action against a man who repeatedly raped and abused his two daughters for over three decades

    British Fritz

    A serious case review published yesterday condemned councils, NHS and police in south Yorkshire and Lincolnshire for a catalogue of failures over 35 years of torment.

    The incest carried on despite the authorities receiving numerous complaints over the years that the abuse was going on.

    The man, 57, now serving life in jail, fathered nine of his own grandchildren. Eventually it took one of his victims to come forward and make a direct allegation before he was arrested, in 2008.

    Sue Fiennes, chairman of Sheffield Safeguarding Children Board, said: “We want to apologise to the family at the heart of this case. It is clear that we failed this family.”

    Despite the failings it emerged that none of the 100 professionals, working for 28 agencies, who had contact with the family, have been disciplined.

    The Telegraph

  • The NHS: Health care needs to be depoliticised and patient led

    The NHS: Health care needs to be depoliticised and patient led

    Reforming the NHS is so vital that we shouldn’t have to wait until after the next election, says Helen Evans .

    Gordon Brown

    With the NHS again moving centre stage in the run-up to the general election, the mainstream political parties will be quick to reassure voters that nationalised health care will only be safe in their hands. Indeed, we have already seen campaign messages from David Cameron’s Conservatives promising that they will “cut the deficit, not the NHS”.

    However, in reality, the UK’s structural financial situation is now so dire that the NHS will have to be substantively overhauled, irrespective of who wins the next general election or whatever they say beforehand. Rather than simply wait for the next government, Nurses for Reform (NFR) believes that as front-line carers, nurses must now put the case for a fundamentally different and better health-care system.

    That is why NFR not only recognises the urgent need for reform, it also believes too many nursing and medical trade unions remain wedded to fundamentally old and outdated ideas. Instead of promoting substantive reform – and in doing so, championing the rights of patients and consumers – they predictably default to the short-term platitudes of demanding more taxpayers’ money or new forms of legislative favour. Such an approach is not only disastrous for nurses and the other medical professions, it is also catastrophic for patients.

    NFR believes that the next government must liberate health provision from the costly and counterproductive world of top-down and un-innovative state control. On a practical level, this means a detailed consideration of the following key points:

    • All health provision in the UK, such as hospitals, clinics and care homes, should be placed in the independent sector, be it for-profit, co-operative, or not-for-profit forms of ownership. What matters here is genuine diversity and openness.
    • Following the logic of planned Conservative Party changes to education and schools, local planning laws must be reformed in order to enable a much greater diversity of – and non-government investment in – health facilities. In a truly post-bureaucratic age, the Secretary of State for Health should no longer have any say over when or where hospitals are built, opened or closed, and nor should local politicians.
    • The laws surrounding health censorship should be repealed so that patients can be empowered with much greater information. In this context, hospitals, GP practices and pharmaceutical enterprises should all be free to advertise and build trusted brands. Only by allowing reputations to be freely built will people be able to realise the advantages of competitive standards and judge for themselves who they can trust in a health-care market.
    • National collective pay- bargaining for health professionals should be ended, monopoly bodies such as the General Medical Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council should be opened up to genuine private alternatives, and all health-related training should be paid for by independent providers – thereby boosting the diversity and opportunities available in a more vibrant labour market.
    • Finally, tax-funded “public health” should regain the trust of people by only concerning itself with those areas that specifically overlap with, and are akin to, warfare: for example, natural disasters and pandemics. Beyond these limits, any further health initiatives aimed at informing or nannying people should only be undertaken by independent-sector organisations, be they for-profit or not-for-profit, and providing they do not use any taxpayers’ money in their execution. All initiatives should be created and funded without any involvement from any aspect of the public sector, again including local government.

    Today, more than ever, such a package of reforms is necessary so that health care is finally depoliticised and led by the people who matter most: patients as consumers. In short, we can do a lot better than the NHS without ever going the way of highly regulated and state-funded American health care. What we need is a genuine market.

    The Telegraph

  • Chatham House Prize 2010

    Chatham House Prize 2010

    All members are now invited to take part in choosing this year’s winner of the Chatham House Prize. The details of the three short-listed nominees can be found below. The award ceremony will take place in the autumn.

    PROCEED TO VOTING FORM >>

    Voting closes at 17.00 on Monday 15 March 2010. Members must be logged in to the website in order to vote.

    All those voting will be automatically entered into a draw for two pairs of free tickets for the award ceremony and dinner.

    Chatham House Prize 2010 Nominees

    HE Abdullah Gül, President of Turkey

    Abdullah Gül has been a significant figure for reconciliation and moderation within Turkey and internationally, and a driving force behind many of the positive steps that Turkey has taken in recent years.

    Mr Gül has worked to deepen Turkey’s traditional ties with the Middle East, mediate between the fractious groups in Iraq and bring together the Afghan and Pakistani leaderships to try to resolve disputes during 2009. He has also made significant efforts to reunify the divided island of Cyprus and has played a leading role, along with his Armenian counterpart, in accelerating the unprecedented search for reconciliation between Turkey and Armenia, including through the so-called ‘football diplomacy’.

    President Gül is an unwavering proponent of anchoring Turkey in the European Union. Under his leadership, Turkey has consolidated civilian democratic rule and pursued extensive political and legal reforms to bring the country closer to European standards of democracy and human rights.

    HE Christine Lagarde, Finance Minister, France

    Christine Lagarde has adeptly steered the French economy through stormy economic times while being a leading protagonist in efforts during 2009 to forge international consensus on reforming the international financial and monetary architecture.

    Ms Lagarde was a key spokesperson for the euro area on the international stage throughout the year. She consistently and eloquently promoted the need for debate on stronger and more effective regulation of the international financial and monetary system. In particular she pushed for the end of guaranteed bonus payouts, which some regarded as having encouraged excessive risk-­taking in the banking sector, and keeping a close watch on the openness of the international economy in the face of the rising risk of protectionism.

    Ms Lagarde’s credibility in financial matters has already been recognized by the Financial Times, which voted her European Finance Minister of the Year in 2009 for her handling of the financial crisis – as demonstrated by the greater resilience of the French economy relative to its European partners.

    Stjepan Mesić, President of Croatia (2000­-10)

    Stjepan Mesić has shown consistently strong and effective leadership in Croatia at a time when the country has been transformed into a modern democratic European state following the regional wars of the 1990s.

    During his two terms in office as President of Croatia the country evolved from a post­-war state on the fringes of Europe to one integrated into NATO and well advanced in negotiations to join the European Union.

    From early on in his presidency Mr Mesić showed courage in his efforts to foster better relations with Croatia’s neighbours. In the face of domestic criticism he sent alleged Croatian war criminals to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and dismissed a number of generals when they publicly protested against that decision, thereby setting the tone for the rest of his tenure and opening Croatia’s accession route to EU membership.

  • Britain has ‘no financial interest’ in Armenia

    Britain has ‘no financial interest’ in Armenia

    UJGreat Britain will not recognize the ‘Armenian genocide’ in the near future.

    Turkey is an important economic, political and strategic partner for Great Britain and as long as this continues, the issue of the Armenian genocide will not be on the agenda of the British parliament or government, the former British ambassador to Armenia, David Miller, said on 9 March, according to Aykakan zhamanak newspaper.

    Miller was speaking at the screening of a film about the Armenian genocide at the London School of Economics.

    ‘Armenia is not Azerbaijan with which Britain has financial interests. Armenia is not Georgia which is of great strategic importance. Armenia is interesting for Britain only in terms of the prevention of war in the region,’ Miller said.

    News-Armenia