Category: UK

  • “[Muslims] eat each other alive, like the dogs that they are…”

    “[Muslims] eat each other alive, like the dogs that they are…”

    Surfing rabbi tells EDL demo ‘We shall prevail’

    By Jessica Elgot and Jennifer Lipman

    edl rabbi
    Rabbi Shifren addresses the EDL demonstration (photo: John Rifkin)

    Around 300 members of the far right organisation the English Defence League (EDL) were joined by a US Rabbi associated with the Tea Party at a demonstration “to oppose Islamic fascism”.

    Speaking outside the Israeli embassy in London, Rabbi Nachum Shifren stressed he was not here to represent the Tea Party but came as someone “who loves freedom”.

    Rabbi Shifren, who is standing for the California state senate, said: “To all my Jewish brothers who have called me a Nazi…I say to them they don’t have the guts to stand up here and take care of business.”

    The so-called surfing rabbi said the EDL were the only group in England with moral courage and that politicians would not admit that “because of the Arab petrol dollars.”

    edl demo
    Rabbi Shifren with EDL members (photo: John Rifkin)

    Rabbi Shifren added that Muslims “eat each other alive, like the dogs that they are.”

    He said: “We shall prevail, we will not let them take over our countries. We will never surrender to the sword of Islam.”

    Shaking his fist in the direction of the Israeli embassy, he shouted slogans in Hebrew, telling the crowd: “You won’t understand what I’m about to say but you will feel my meaning.”

    Police surrounded the crowd, who were shouting chants about Allah. A man claiming to be Tommy Robinson, the EDL’s founder and leader, denied that the EDL was a violent organisation.

    But he told the JC: “I will protect myself against anyone and I will stand up to anyone and that’s what you’re seeing.

    “It will be lads, you will see lads who are not prepared to back down.”

    Although the demonstration was ostensibly to show support for Israel, he said he was there to take on militant Islam.

    He said: “This isn’t Mickey Mouse, it’s militant Islam. We’re opposing a fascist murdering ideology.”

    Mr Robinson, a carpenter from Luton, said that the counter-demonstrators had been “paid to come by this government” and that critics of the EDL “listen to the propaganda.”

    Later in the afternoon, the speech of Roberta Moore, leader of the Jewish division of the EDL, was interrupted by an anti-fascist demonstrator who threw water over the public address system.

    Hordes of EDL supporters broke ranks to chase the man down Kensington High Street, followed by police. Ms Moore said: “Someone is trying to silence us, so that means our message is sticking.”

    After a brief tussle with some anti-fascist demonstrators, several EDL members were searched by police but no arrests were made.

    Down the high street around 30 people, from organisations including Unite Against Fascism, Jewdas, and Jews for Justice for Palestinians, as well as two strictly orthodox anti-Zionists, gathered for a counter-demonstration.

    Siobhan Schwartzberg, a student from East London and a member of the Socialist Workers Party was one of the organisers. She described the EDL as an Islamophobic and racist organisation and said the demonstration was a marking stone for the group.

    “The EDL invited Rabbi Shifren….to use minorities to get at other minorities. We want to say you do not speak for us, you are not a voice for us.”

    “This pretence that they are a voice of Jewish people – they want to say that they are an acceptable organisation and they are not.

    “They want to be seen to be making clear bigger political ties that don’t exist.”

    Yossi Bartal, an Israeli student living in Brighton, added: “It is very important to make clear that there are many Jews and Israelis against the connection they are trying to make.

    “The EDL tries to adopt liberal language, but invite Rabbi Shifren, who wants a religious state. It’s funny that this is the one Jew thy have found that will support them.

    “They are fascists and not speaking in our name.”

    Stephen Shashoua, director of the Three Faiths Forum, said: “The EDL are always trying to divide communities and this as a really low way to do it.

    “What we have to seize is Jews, Muslims and others getting together to fight it, either on the streets, in the papers, and across the board, because this is the society we want together, and they don’t represent anything like that.”

    , October 25, 2010

    Rabbi Shifren’s speech at the EDL demonstration

    Rabbi ShifrenFrom the minute I set foot in this country I’ve had nothing but abuse and I tell you now, I welcome every single bit of it.

    To all my Jewish brothers who have called me a Nazi, and have asked why I’m poking my nose into England’s business, I say to them they don’t have the guts to stand up here and take care of business…

    “There is only one group in England with moral courage. I wish just one politician had the back bone to stand up and agree, but they’ll never do that because of the Arab petrol dollars…

    “In those so-called freedom centres, they plot to destroy and kill us. We’re still waiting for the Muslims to make peace with each other. They eat each other alive, like the dogs that they are…

    “I’m looking at this crowd of people here in the UK, and I can see Christians, Hindus, Sikhs and yes, even Jews too. We wanted to say to all those liberals who preach multiculturalism why don’t you go to Saudi Arabia and start there…

    “I will not stand by and watch the destruction of both of our countries from within…

    History will be recorded that on this day, read by our children for eternity, one group lit the spark to liberate us from the oppressors of our two governments and the leftist, fifth column, quisling press, and that it was the EDL which started the liberation of England from evil…

    “Today is the first day of the rest of your lives. We shall prevail, we will not let them take over our countries. We will never surrender to the sword of Islam…

    , October 25, 2010

  • Most Successful Turks

    Most Successful Turks

    london tower

    The Business Network ‘Most Successful Turks* ‘Awards is an awards program recognising success, innovation and ethics across business within the UK.

    This is the first year of the awards where individuals and companies are acknowledged for being the best of the best in their field.

    Britons who have been influential in the Turkish Community both in the UK and Turkey will also be recognised.

    Entries are initially looked at by a short listing panel who will score each entry against specific criteria.  The 3 highest scoring from each category will be announced here and you, the public will vote on who should receive the award.

    The awards will be announced at the Awards Ceremony on 27 October 2010 at White Hall, Banqueting House.

    *Turks / Turkish – This includes everyone who is orginally from Turkey and North Cyprus.

    banqueting house

  • Turkey, the UK’s Favourite Destination

    Turkey, the UK’s Favourite Destination

    The UK weather is rapidly becoming colder and UK residents may be thinking of embarking on a short break during the upcoming winter season. Turkish beaches seem to be at the very top of the destinations list for such breaks during 2010.

    oludeniz

    According to new figures released by UK market research agency, GfK, Brits embarking on beach holidays seem to favour Turkish beaches above all others. GfK’s figures were released ahead of the World Travel Market, which is set to be held in London mid-November. The figures have also shown that Turkey is one of the top five destinations for growth in the UK travel market.

    This new popularity is mostly due to the all-inclusive holiday market seeing steady growth and the number of operators providing packages for Turkey. However, it’s not only the Brits who enjoy Turkey’s beach holidays, the Mediterranean nation expects its tourism sector to expand by more than 12% between 2010 and 2013, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers.[…]

    Turkey’s Minister of Culture and Tourism, Ertugrul Gunay, said “Turkish tourism has been a spectacular success this year and the future remains bright, with visitor numbers continuing to grow.”

    He may well be right, as the nation’s largest city, Istanbul, was voted European Capital of Culture during 2010.[…]

    PRWeb

  • BBC to face funding squeeze

    BBC to face funding squeeze

    (Reuters) – The fee levied from taxpayers to fund the BBC will be frozen for six years in an effort to restrain spending by the state broadcaster at a time when other parts of the public sector face swingeing cuts.

    BBC

    Government sources confirmed on Tuesday reports aired by the BBC that the licence fee would be frozen at 145.50 pounds a year for every household with a television set.

    The measure will be announced on Wednesday as part of a broad public spending review which will see some departments lose a quarter of their budgets as the government strives to slash its budget deficit from a record 11 percent of GDP.

    The sources also confirmed that the BBC World Service, which until now had been funded separately from the rest of the corporation out of the foreign ministry’s budget, would now be funded from the licence fee.

    The World Service broadcasts around the planet to an audience of millions in English and 31 other languages. It is one of the best known arms of the BBC around the world, particularly in developing countries.

    Taking on the cost of the World Service and other BBC units that were previously funded separately, such as Welsh language TV station S4C, will mean the BBC will have to absorb additional costs of about 300 million pounds per year, the sources said.

    The BBC reported on its website that the measures amounted to a 16 percent cut in its funding over the next six years.

    The squeeze on BBC funding could prove popular after a series of revelations about the high pay of some BBC executives and presenters. Opinion polls show that a vast majority of Britons like the BBC in general, but many disapprove of some of the top pay packages.

    (Reporting by Estelle Shirbon; editing by Michael Roddy)

    Reuters

    BBC sacks  £475,000-a-year deputy director general Mark Byford

    Byford1

    The BBC’s deputy director general, Mark Byford, is to be made redundant as part of a move to reduce its 10-strong executive board, members of which have long been accused of earning excessive salaries.

    Mark Thompson, director general, will announce today that Mr Byford, a BBC employee for 32 years and occasional interim director general, will lose his job and will not be replaced.

    As well as being paid his salary of £475,000 a year until he leaves in 2011, Mr Byford is expected to receive a redundancy payment of between £800,000 and £900,000.

    The 52-year-old has a £3.7m pension pot, from which he can expect £215,000 a year when he reaches retirement age.

    In August, Mr Thompson brought forward by a year a pledge to cut senior managerial costs by 25 per cent.

    Sharon Baylay, head of marketing and communications, and Lucy Adams, human resources director, will also leave the board. They will retain their roles but report to Caroline Thomson, chief operating officer.

    Yorkshire-born Mr Byford is popular among BBC staff. In 2004, he served as interim director general, after Greg Dyke resigned in the wake of the Hutton report, which claimed the BBC had misreported the official justification for the invasion of Iraq.

    He has also managed the BBC’s responses to several scandals, including the “Crowngate” affair of 2007, in which a trailer for a documentary was edited in such a way as to suggest that the Queen had stormed out of a photography session. She was in fact on her way in.

    In an announcement to staff today, Mr Thompson is expected to praise Mr Byford, saying that he had “never had a closer or more supportive relationship with any colleague”. Within the corporation, speculation concerning Mr Byford’s departure has been rife for some time, where his name has become linked with the issues of pay, expenses and pensions.

    The Independent

    BBC paid director general Mark Thompson £788,000

    Mark Thompson

    BBC director general Mark Thompson was paid £788,000 last year, although like other executives he waived his right to an annual bonus.

    Mr Thompson’s remuneration, which was made up of a £624,000 salary, £9,000 in expenses and a £155,000 pension contribution, was up just £18,000 on the previous year.

    He was easily the highest paid BBC executive, earning more than 70% than his nearest rival in the 12 months to March 31.

    Mr Thompson’s salary has gone up 11% since his first year in the job, 2004/05, when it was set at £560,000.

    It is also 70% higher than the salary received by the previous director general, Greg Dyke, in his final full year, 2002-2003, when his basic pay was £368,000 – though he also took home a bonus of £88,000.

    The BBC director general’s overall remuneration has more than doubled since 1997-1998, when John Birt received a total of £387,000, including bonus but not pension contributions.

    John Smith, the chief executive of commercial division BBC Worldwide, was the next best paid corporation manager last year, collecting £460,000, up from the year before by £16,000.

    Mr Smith’s pay included a salary of £354,000, an £80,000 bonus and £26,000 in expenses.

    The BBC deputy director general, Mark Byford, earned £437,000, made up of £425,000 in salary and £12,000 in expenses.

    Jana Bennett, the director of BBC Vision, was paid £433,000, with a £343,000 salary, £20,000 in expenses and £70,000 in pensions-related remuneration.

    The head of radio, Jenny Abramsky, pocketed £329,000, including £316,000 in salary and £13,000 in expenses.

    The finance director, Zarin Patel, was paid £386,000, while the chief operating officer, Caroline Thomson, collected £361,000.

    The new media boss, Ashley Highfield, was paid £359,000, while the marketing chief, Tim Davie, took home £406,000.

    The new human resources boss, Stephen Kelly, was given a £75,000 payment when he joined the corporation last October as compensation for loss of income from leaving his previous job, contributing to overall remuneration of £268,000.

    Overall executive pay at the BBC increased by just £75,000 in the 12 months to March 31.

    Executive pay rose from a combined £4,177,000 last year to £4,252,000 this year.

    Figures 2007

    The Guardian

  • Reverend Jackson Sr called for an end to abuse of police powers

    Reverend Jackson Sr called for an end to abuse of police powers

    By Tolga Cakir

    Reverend Jackson Sr visited King’s College London. Reverend Jackson made a historical speech to audience of students, academics and representatives of non-governmental organisations to promote good policing, peace, justice and equal treatment for all.

    L jackson

    Reverend Jackson is founder and president of the Rainbow Push coalition, is one of America’s foremost religious and political figures. Over the past forty years, he has played a pivotal role in virtually every movement in the US. President Bill Clinton awarded Reverend Jackson the nation’s highest civilian honour, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, in 2000.

    Reverend Jackson called for an end to ‘racial profiling’ and the abuse of police powers to stop and search, which have undermined trust in the police on both sides of the Atlantic. He lunched StopWatch a new coalition of researchers and NGO’ s which has been formed to highlight the abuse of police stop and search powers, to promote good policing and to stimulate research on alternative ways to create safe and peaceful communities.

    Some abstracts from Reverend Jackson’s historical lecture

    Stop and search public policy is one of the most contentious public issues. Last year alone, 8 million in US and 1 million in UK car stop search took place. Every person has got a right to walk freely without interference of the state furthermore these powers should be used when necessary, proportionate and fair. These fairness should also used in the recently curtailed controversial “section 44” terrorism powers.

    Rate of stop and search for Blacks 27 times higher and for Asians 7 times higher than other racial backgrounds.

    Being against racial profiling is for police accountability and to increase public trust in the force.

    Many lives have been lost by violent crimes; Nazism against Jews is one of them..

    Segregation in Africa was one of them.

    Nelson Mandela was victim of them.

    Many institutions do racial profiling. The leadership in the institutions must be corrected and I believe this must stop, the abuse of “stop and torment us”. For this we need each other. We should all be free and have a right to move freely without any harassment. Democracy promises equality for gender, race and religion.

    Christianity is also against racial profiling.  We need to change the institutions behaviours, attitudes, laws and justice.

    In Britain and in US police racism does exist. UK terrorism act is violated for protesters and religious profiling. This is totally unjust. This builds walls of separation.

    We should detect, react and stop this happening.

    We should not fear and fight back.

    We should learn to live together.

    We should fight back for our dream of a new world and new justice.

    Keep faith and keep the hope alive.

    ——————————————————————————————————-

    Comments:

    Stop Watch: Powers without reasonable suspicion

    The focus of community concern has usually been those stop and searches conducted under section 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (pace), which requires officers to have reasonable suspicion before conducting a stop and search. However, the police are increasingly using other stop and search powers that carry no requirement of reasonable suspicion. These include the recently curtailed controversial “section 44” terrorism powers which allowed police to stop and search people and vehicles in a designated area without individualised suspicion.

    Other frequently used powers are those granted under section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, which allow police to stop and search individuals without reasonable suspicion “in anticipation of violence” and schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which allows stops in ports and airports for counterterrorism purposes without reasonable suspicion. Police use of these powers has given rise to similar problems as seen on with section 44: arbitrariness, abuse, lack of monitoring and safeguards, and a disproportionate impact on ethnic minorities.

    Ben Bowling : The abuse of stop and search has driven a wedge between police and communities

    Ben Bowling, Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at King’s College London – also a member of StopWatch – said, “The abuse of stop and search has driven a wedge between police and communities. It is often unfair and ineffective and can be counter-productive. StopWatch aims to monitor the use of stop and search powers and focus research and public policy on developing good policing. Together we can find fairer and more inclusive ways of creating a safer society”.

    Rob Berkeley: Any reforms announced should be fair and inclusive

    Commenting, Rob Berkeley, Director of the Runnymede Trust, a member organisation of StopWatch, said: “Given the government’s current review into policing in the UK, it is crucial that any reforms announced are fair and inclusive – particularly in relation to stop and search. StopWatch intends to act as a check on government as it carries out these reforms, as well as address the stark ethnic disproportionalities in stop and search”

    For more information;

    Stop Watch

    c/o  Runnymede Trust

    7 Plough Yard

    London

    EC2A 3LP

    Email: [email protected]

    Telephone: 0207 377 92 22

    Further information can be found at: www.stop-watch.org

  • Hillary Clinton’s warning to Britain over cuts in defence budget

    Hillary Clinton’s warning to Britain over cuts in defence budget

    Barack Obama’s government has delivered a stark public warning against major cuts in the British defence budget, suggesting that they would undermine Nato and strain the Special Relationship.

    By James Kirkup, Political Correspondent

    HillaryClintonWarnsBritain
    Hillary Clinton: 'I think we do have to have an alliance where there is a commitment to the common defence' Photo: AFP/GETTY

    Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, and Robert Gates, the secretary of defence, both said they were worried about deep reductions in Britain’s Armed Forces and the consequences for international security.

    The unusual public intervention came as talks on the defence budget went down to the wire, with defence chiefs making 11th-hour personal appeals to David Cameron against cuts last night.

    The Daily Telegraph disclosed last month that US officials were privately concerned that British defence spending was about to fall below 2 per cent of gross domestic product, the minimum standard expected of Nato members. Mrs Clinton and Mr Gates, America’s two most senior figures on international relations and security, made those fears public in separate remarks.

    In a BBC interview to be broadcast today, Mrs Clinton was asked whether defence cuts being made in Europe, and specifically in Britain, worried the US administration.

    She replied: “It does. The reason it does is because I think we do have to have an alliance where there is a commitment to the common defence.“

    Nato has been the most successful alliance for defensive purposes in the history of the world, I guess, but it has to be maintained. Now each country has to be able to make its appropriate contributions.”

    Mr Gates attended a meeting of Nato defence ministers in Brussels yesterday, where he delivered his own warning. “My worry is that the more our allies cut their capabilities, the more people will look to the US to cover whatever gaps are created,” he told reporters on his flight to Belgium. “At a time when we are facing stringencies of our own, that’s a concern for me.”

    Later, he told the Nato meeting: “As nations deal with their economic problems, we must guard against the hollowing out of alliance military capability by spending reductions that cut too far into muscle.”

    The American intervention will increase tensions within Whitehall over the scale of the defence cuts to be announced next week.

    Britain is one of a handful of European Nato members that meets the 2 per cent standard. Officials believe that defence spending could fall as low as 1.7 per cent of GDP.

    George Osborne, the Chancellor, is pressing for a 10 per cent cut in the defence budget, which Dr Liam Fox, the Defence Secretary, is resisting fiercely. Sources said the two sides were discussing a “midpoint” compromise of around 6 per cent. That would represent a political victory for Dr Fox but would still leave the Services facing painful losses.

    The Royal Navy could lose its amphibious landing capability, meaning Britain would be unable to mount another campaign like that in the Falklands. The future of Harrier and Tornado jets also hangs in the balance. Navy insiders said cutting the Harriers would mean that Britain’s first new aircraft carrier would enter service in 2016 with no British aircraft to fly from it.

    The heads of the Navy, Army and RAF went to No 10 last night for private meetings with the Prime Minister to warn of the “serious consequences” of the Treasury plan.

    “The PM should be aware that the cuts the Treasury is looking for are ridiculous,” said a senior military source. William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, tried to play down US fears, insisting: “We will remain a very serious country in defence matters.”

    The National Audit Office today will disclose that the “black hole” in the order book for defence equipment grew by £3.3 billion in Labour’s final year in office. The decision to delay construction work on the new carriers will add £650 million to their final cost, taking the eventual bill to £5.9  billion, the watchdog will say.

    A £2.7 billion increase in the cost of Typhoon jets was caused by a decision to buy 16 additional aircraft, in order to meet international obligations to Germany, Italy and Spain.

    14 Oct 2010