Category: UK

  • Biggest spending squeeze on families since 1921

    Biggest spending squeeze on families since 1921

    pocketmoney PINKY
    Squeezed: relative spending power is down to the lowest levels since 1921

    Families are facing the biggest peace-time squeeze in their spending power since 1921 as wages fail to keep up with soaring inflation, according to a new report.

    The rising cost of essential items such as oil, utility bills, food and clothes are set to leave the average household with £910 a year less to spend in 2011 than two years ago, said the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR).

    Disposable incomes are due to fall by 2% in 2011, following a 0.8% drop in 2010, as cash-strapped consumers suffer the biggest hit to their finances apart from during World War Two and the recession following the First World War, it added.

    It forecasts that inflation will average 3.9% in 2011 – its highest since 1992 – as January’s hike in VAT to 20% from 17.5% and the rising cost of oil and other commodities continue to drive up prices.

    Pay packets, on the other hand, will rise just 1.9% as unemployment remains high and the public sector makes cut-backs.

    But the Government’s austerity drive is “only a minor element in the squeeze on household incomes”, with the soaring cost of commodities being the major factor, claimed the report.

    Commodity prices are being driven higher by surging demand from emerging economies such as China and supply shocks including the conflict in Libya, which is impacting the price of oil.

    The lack of consumer spending power means the economy will only grow by 1% in 2011 and will be “subdued” for the next two or three years, said the consultancy. Its forecast is significantly below the 1.7% predicted by Government’s Office for Budget Responsibility.

    The CEBR’s report echoes the views of Bank of England governor Mervyn King who earlier this year said consumers’ finances were facing their biggest squeeze since the 1920s.

    A spate of retailers have reported tough conditions on the high street in 2011 as consumers remain cautious, with HMV and Dixons Retail which owns Currys and PC World reporting disappointing profits.

    www.thisislondon.co.uk, 11 Apr 2011

  • Thousands Demo To Protest Reggae Star’s Death

    Thousands Demo To Protest Reggae Star’s Death

    Thousands of people have been marching through London in protest at the death of reggae artist Smiley Culture.

    The Brixton riots happened 30 years ago

    The protestors walked from Wandsworth Road to Scotland Yard via Parliament Square demanding “justice” for the 48-year-old, who died last month while police were searching his home.

    The 80s star, real name David Emmanuel, died after four Metropolitan Police officers arrived at his house with a search warrant.

    An inquest into his death was told he had stabbed himself in the heart when he went to make a cup of tea.

    However, this is something his family disputes.

    Smiley’s nephew, Merlin Emmanuel, said: “What we found hard to believe was that he was allowed to go into the kitchen to make a cup of tea and be around utensils and whatever else that might be in the kitchen which could be a danger to himself or to others. It just doesn’t really make sense.

    “All we want to do is get to the bottom of what really happened, the truth. We’re not speculating, we just find it very hard to believe the police’s account so far of what’s happened.”

    Smiley Culture grew up south of Brixton from where the march in honour of him and 400 other people who have died in police custody started.

    A few weeks ago a meeting of the Metropolitan Police Authority had to be adjourned because of heckling from friends and family of Smiley’s who were sitting in the public gallery. Many walked out in protest.

    It is three decades since the Brixton riots, but many believe they have caused lasting damage to the relatonship between police and the community.

    Author Alex Wheatle, whose debut novel was entitled Brixton Rock, says Smiley’s death may have serious repercussions in the black community.

    “Slowly, things were getting better, even though I think it was happening too slowly… the police is an institution which is slow to change.

    “But if the truth doesn’t come out about the Smiley Culture incident it might set back police relations a generation.”

    In a statement, the chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority, Kit Malthouse, said he would be “speaking with the IPCC to ensure that all efforts are being made to liaise directly with the family and friends of David Emmanuel and to re-assure the community of their commitment to the investigation”.

    He will also ask the IPCC that the conclusions of the investigation be published.

    Smiley, who had success in the 1980s with the singles Police Officer and Cockney Translation, was on bail for conspiracy to supply cocaine at the time of his death.

    His family say they have commissioned an independent post-mortem examination to help determine the circumstances which led to his stabbing.

    The Sky

     

     

  • Immigration is neither good nor bad

    Immigration is neither good nor bad

    o Zrinka Bralo

    o guardian.co.uk, Friday 15 April 2011 10.17 BST

    David Cameron immigration speech

    David Cameron talked of wanting ‘good immigration’ not ‘mass immigration’ in his speech this week. Photograph: Ben Birchall/PA

    camoronDavid Cameron’s speech on Thursday was a perfect example of everything that is wrong with the debate on immigration. He starts off by identifying “concerns on the doorstep”, “myths have crept in”, pays a bit of lip service to “benefits of immigration” and then launches into “controls”, “cuts” and “abuses”. He, of course, leans into lazy Brits on welfare who do not want to do dirty jobs and his speech is full of anecdotes about immigrants abusing the system.

    These are all very familiar arguments about the phenomenon of migration. But one thing that most politicians miss is that migration is neither good nor bad. It just is. Adding value judgments becomes problematic because when we talk about immigration, we are in fact talking about immigrants. When the prime minister, or others in power, talk about immigration as bad, abusive, criminal and threatening, they pass judgment on every person that migrated to this country. They are undercutting the work of every migrant that has made this country great. Is it a surprise that people are so afraid of the other?

    So if you have a foreign-sounding name (like me), look and sound a bit different (like me), the message is: you will never belong here no matter how hard you try to integrate, because you should not have been here in the first place. While you were cheating your way into our country, our universities, our marriages and taking away our benefits, you were also too hard working, and willing to do our dirty jobs, and making our poor British-born welfare claimants lazy.

    The truth is, like everything that has to do with human beings, migration is complicated. Migration is an experience, and most people once they reach their destination just want to get on with their lives, work, study and raise their families.

    This government has fallen into the same trap as the previous one – it is making policies based on negative perceptions and fears rather than addressing immigration as a neutral social phenomenon that can be as beneficial or as damaging as we make it. Sadly our government has a fantasy that if it can prevent people from coming and staying here, it will solve all our social problems.

    Constantly talking about immigrants as the problem detracts from the real reasons behind the shortage of social housing, unemployment and cuts in public services. As long as we think that immigrants can somehow be stopped before they reach our shores, we will be stuck in this circular debate of numbers, controls and blame.

    The citizens of Britain, including migrants, are caught in a crossfire of mixed messages that does not increase understanding about the issues most important to them. Migrants are left to deal with the backlash that has serious consequences for our treatment and rights and we are left with no voice, regardless of how well we speak English.

    A true debate will be possible when we all accept that immigration is an inescapable global phenomenon. For this to happen, we need visionary leadership to distil and address other serious issues that fuel emotions behind the smokescreen of the tough immigration debate.

    via Immigration is neither good nor bad | Zrinka Bralo | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk.

  • David Cameron says that immigrants should learn English

    David Cameron says that immigrants should learn English

    The prime minister warns in a speech that an unwillingness to integrate has created a disjointed Britain

    David Cameron immigration 007

    Full text of David Cameron’s speech

    Comments (964)

    • Nicholas Watt, chief political correspondent
    • The Guardian, Thursday 14 April 2011
    • Article history
    • David Cameron blames Labour for allowing immigration to become ‘too high’ Link to this videoDavid Cameron will warn that immigrants unable to speak English or unwilling to integrate have created a “kind of discomfort and disjointedness” which has disrupted communities across Britain.

      In his most outspoken speech on immigration since becoming prime minister, Cameron will blame Labour for allowing immigration to become “too high” and for adopting an approach that allowed the British National party to flourish.

      The prime minister will open his speech, in Hampshire, by saying that immigration is a hugely emotive subject that must be handled with sensitivity. But he will then say that Labour presided over the “largest influx” of immigration in British history, which saw 2.2 million more people settling in Britain between 1997 and 2009 than leaving to live abroad.

      Cameron will say this has placed serious pressure on schools, housing and the NHS, and has also created social pressures.

      “Real communities are bound by common experiences forged by friendship and conversation, knitted together by all the rituals of the neighbourhood, from the school run to the chat down the pub. And these bonds can take time,” he will say.

      “So real integration takes time. That’s why, when there have been significant numbers of new people arriving in neighbourhoods, perhaps not able to speak the same language as those living there, on occasions not really wanting or even willing to integrate, that has created a kind of discomfort and disjointedness in some neighbourhoods. This has been the experience for many people in our country – and I believe it is untruthful and unfair not to speak about it and address it.”

      The prime minister will stride into sensitive political territory when he accuses Labour of helping to stoke an uncertain climate over immigration. Cameron believes Labour inflamed the issue by accusing critics of racism while at the same time pandering to the hard right. He will say: “I believe the role of politicians is to cut through the extremes of this debate and approach the subject sensibly and reasonably. The last government, in contrast, actually helped to inflame the debate. On the one hand, there were Labour ministers who closed down discussion, giving the impression that concerns about immigration were somehow racist. On the other, there were ministers hell-bent on burnishing their hardline credentials by talking tough but doing nothing to bring the numbers down.

      “This had damaging consequences in terms of controlling immigration and in terms of public debate. It created the space for extremist parties to flourish, as they could tell people that mainstream politicians weren’t listening to their concerns or doing anything about them.”

      The speech may add to coalition tensions after the Liberal Democrats distanced themselves from the prime minister’s language. Nick Clegg saw the speech which he “noted rather than approved”.

      One Lib Dem source said: “We use different language. But we all work in government to strike a balance to ensure Britain has a system people have confidence in.”

      No 10 insisted that the speech does not mark a return to the era of William Hague as Tory leader when he used the issue as part of a “core votes” strategy. On the eve of the 2001 election, Hague warned that Britain was in danger of turning into a “foreign land” in remarks that technically referred to the EU. Cameron will say that Britain has benefited hugely from immigration. “Go into any hospital and you’ll find people from Uganda, India and Pakistan who are caring for our sick and vulnerable. Go into schools and universities and you’ll find teachers from all over the world, inspiring our young people.”

      But the prime minister will use his speech to challenge those who say:

      • Immigration cannot be controlled because Britain is a member of the EU. Cameron will say that future EU member states will be subject to tougher transitional controls and the UK can address immigration from outside the EU through the cap on non-EU immigration.

      • Immigration can be controlled – but to do so would inflict serious damage on the economy. Cameron will say the government is thinking “incredibly carefully” about which workers should come.

      But the prime minister will make clear that immigration cannot be controlled until Britain’s welfare system is reformed. “Put simply, we will never control immigration properly unless we tackle welfare dependency. That’s another powerful reason why this government is undertaking the biggest shake-up of the welfare system for generations making sure that work will always pay and ending the option of living a life on the dole when a life in work is possible.”

      The prime minister will also condemn forced marriages and those who say they should be tolerated. “There are forced marriages taking place in our country, and overseas as a means of gaining entry to the UK. This is the practice where some young British girls are bullied and threatened into marrying someone they don’t want to.

      “I’ve got no time for those who say this is a culturally relative issue – it is wrong, full stop, and we’ve got to stamp it out. Then there are just the straightforward sham marriages.”In February, the prime minister gave a speech in Munich condemning “state multiculturalism” which had “tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run counter to our values”.

  • Joint article on Libya: The pathway to peace

    Joint article on Libya: The pathway to peace

    Friday 15 April 2011

    number10logo

    Prime Minister David Cameron, President Barack Obama and President Nicolas Sarkozy have written a joint article on Libya underlining their determination that Qadhafi must “go and go for good”.

     

    Read the article

    Together with our NATO allies and coalition partners, the United States, France and Britain have been united at the UN Security Council, as well as the following Paris Conference, in building a broad-based coalition to respond to  the crisis in Libya. We are equally united on what needs to happen in order to end it.

    Even as we continue military operations today to protect civilians in Libya, we are determined to look to the future. We are convinced that better times lie ahead for the people of Libya, and a pathway can be forged to achieve just that.

    We must never forget the reasons why the international community was obliged to act in the first place. As Libya descended into chaos with Colonel Qadhafi attacking his own people, the Arab League called for action. The Libyan opposition called for help. And the people of Libya looked to the world in their hour of need. In an historic Resolution, the United Nations Security Council authorised all necessary measures to protect the people of Libya from the attacks upon them.  By responding immediately, our countries  halted the advance of Qadhafi’s forces. The bloodbath that he had promised to inflict upon the citizens of the besieged city of Benghazi has been prevented.

    Tens of thousands of lives have been protected.  But the people of Libya are suffering terrible horrors at Qadhafi’s hands each and every day. His rockets and his shells rained down on defenceless civilians in Ajdabiya. The city of Misrata is enduring a mediaeval siege, as Qadhafi tries to strangle its population into submission.   The evidence of disappearances and abuses grows daily.

    Our duty and our mandate under UN Security Council Resolution 1973 is to protect civilians, and we are doing that. It is not to remove Qadhafi by force.  But it is impossible to imagine a future for Libya with Qadhafi in power.  The International Criminal Court is rightly investigating the crimes committed against civilians and the grievous violations of international law.  It is unthinkable that someone who has tried to massacre his own people can play a part in their future government. The brave citizens of those towns that have held out against forces that have been mercilessly targeting them would face a fearful vengeance if the world accepted such an arrangement.  It would be an unconscionable betrayal.

    Furthermore, it would condemn Libya to being not only a pariah state, but a failed state too.  Qadhafi has promised to carry out terrorist attacks against civilian ships and airliners.  And because he has lost the consent of his people any deal that leaves him in power would lead to further chaos and lawlessness.  We know from bitter experience what that would mean.  Neither Europe, the region, or the world can afford a new safe haven for extremists.

    There is a pathway to peace that promises new hope for the people of Libya.  A future without Qadhafi that preserves Libya’s integrity and sovereignty, and restores her economy and the prosperity and security of her people.  This needs to begin with a genuine end to violence, marked by deeds not words.  The regime has to pull back from the cities it is besieging, including Ajdabiya, Misrata and Zintan, and their forces return to their barracks. However, so long as Qadhafi is in power, NATO and its coalition partners must maintain their operations so that civilians remain protected and the pressure on the regime builds.  Then a genuine transition from dictatorship to an inclusive constitutional process can really begin, led by a new generation of leaders.  In order for that transition to succeed, Colonel Qadhafi must go and go for good.  At that point, the United Nations and its members should help the Libyan people as they rebuild where Qadhafi has destroyed – to repair homes and hospitals, to restore basic utilities, and to assist Libyans as they develop the institutions to underpin a prosperous and open society.

    This vision for the future of Libya has the support of a broad coalition of countries, including many from the Arab world.  These countries came together in London on 29 March and founded a Contact Group which met this week in Doha to support a solution to the crisis that respects the will of the Libyan people.

    Today, NATO and its coalition partners are acting in the name of the United Nations with an unprecedented international legal mandate.  But it will be the people of Libya, not the UN, that choose their new constitution, elect their new leaders, and write the next chapter in their history.

    Britain, France and the United States will not rest until the United Nations Security Council resolutions have been implemented and the Libyan people can choose their own future.

    The Prime Ministers Office

    Number 10

  • Anger over English lesson funding cuts

    Anger over English lesson funding cuts

    Teachers say government rules mean fewer immigrants will be able to afford ESOL classes they have been told to take

    Jessica Shepherd

    handwriting
    Just over 180,000 students take ESOL classes in England.

    Teachers have reacted with anger to the prime minister’s call for immigrants to take English lessons, arguing that the coalition has cut funds for these classes.

    At a speech on immigration in Hampshire on Thursday, David Cameron will warn that immigrants unable to speak English or unwilling to integrate have created a “kind of discomfort and disjointedness”, which has disrupted communities across Britain.

    But teachers of English said new rules, devised by the coalition government, would mean far fewer immigrants could afford to learn basic English.

    From autumn this year, the government will only fund classes in basic English to immigrants on jobseeker’s allowance and employability skills allowance. Those claiming income support and other benefits will no longer be able to attend classes for free.

    Newcomers to this country who lack basic English skills will have to pay half the cost of their lessons and employers will have to foot the bill for English lessons that take place in the workplace.

    Teachers of basic English classes – known as English for speakers of other languages or ESOL – said the vast majority of their students were housewives whose husbands would not be able to afford for them to study part-time at £400 or £500 a year.

    “We think that this change could mean that about half of all ESOL students in some cities will be shut out from attending lessons,” said Judith Kirsh from the National Association for Teaching English and Community Languages to Adults, the professional association for ESOL teachers.

    Just over 180,000 students take ESOL classes in England. The lessons are the first step to learning English for most immigrants and take place in further education colleges and community centres.

    Kirsh said hundreds of ESOL teachers faced redundancy as a result of the changes.

    Perdy Patterson, an ESOL teacher at Tower Hamlets College in east London, said immigrants wanted to learn and speak English. “There are waiting lists often in the hundreds for these classes. It is disingenuous of Cameron to use this line of argument and then to also be cutting these classes.”

    She said the most vulnerable women in society were being hit. “These are women who are dependent on their husbands’ income. The changes will mean we don’t even know whether there will be an ESOL sector next year.”

    Indi Bains, an ESOL teacher at Hackney Community College in east London, said the changes to the funding of the classes would make it much more difficult for immigrants to integrate into British society.

    The National Institute of Adult Continuing Education said that changes over the last four years had meant the number of ESOL students had dropped from 219,000 to 183,000.

    “Current proposals put up to half of the remaining places at risk,” said Chris Taylor, the institute’s programme manager for ESOL.

    “What the reduction in ESOL places means is fewer chances for a reviving British economy to make use of the skills of migrants. It means that the children of families with poor English have an extra hurdle to overcome in doing well at school and it means that it will take longer for people to share their experiences with others in the ways the prime minister describes.

    “In order to achieve real integration, we ask the government to look again at the evidence and assess what could be done to ensure those individuals most disadvantaged get the English language courses they need.”

    www.guardian.co.uk, 14 April 2011