Category: UK

  • The pursuit of Julian Assange is an assault on freedom and a mockery of journalism

    The pursuit of Julian Assange is an assault on freedom and a mockery of journalism

    assangeThe British government’s threat to invade the Ecuadorean embassy in London and seize Julian Assange is of historic significance. David Cameron, the former PR man to a television industry huckster and arms salesman to sheikdoms, is well placed to dishonour international conventions that have protected Britons in places of upheaval. Just as Tony Blair’s invasion of Iraq led directly to the acts of terrorism in London on 7 July 2005, so Cameron and Foreign Secretary William Hague have compromised the safety of British representatives across the world.
    Threatening to abuse a law designed to expel murderers from foreign embassies, while defaming an innocent man as an “alleged criminal”, Hague has made a laughing stock of Britain across the world, though this view is mostly suppressed in Britain. The same brave news­papers and broadcasters that have supported Britain’s part in epic bloody crimes, from the genocide in Indonesia to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, now attack the “human rights record” of Ecuador, whose real crime is to stand up to the bullies in London and Washington.

    Unclubbable

    It is as if the Olympics happy-clappery has been subverted overnight by an illuminating display of colonial thuggery. Witness the British army officer-cum-BBC reporter Mark Urban “interviewing” a braying Sir Christopher Meyer, Blair’s former apologist in Washington, outside the Ecuadorean embassy, the pair of them erupting with Blimpish indignation that the unclubbable Assange and the uncowed Rafael Correa should expose the western system of rapacious power. Similar affront is vivid in the pages of the Guardian, which has counselled Hague to be “patient” and that storming the embassy would be “more trouble than it is worth”. Assange was not a political refugee, the Guar­dian declared, because “neither Sweden nor the UK would in any case deport someone who might face torture or the death penalty”.

    The irresponsibility of this statement matches the Guardian’s perfidious role in the whole Assange affair. The paper knows full well that documents released by WikiLeaks indicate that Sweden has consistently submitted to pressure from the United States in matters of civil rights. In December 2001, the Swedish government abruptly revoked the political refugee status of two Egyptians, Ahmed Agiza and Mohammed el-Zari, who were handed to a CIA kidnap squad at Stockholm airport and “rendered” to Egypt, where they were tortured. An investigation by the Swedish ombudsman for justice found that the government had “seriously violated” the two men’s human rights.

    In a 2009 US embassy cable obtained by Wiki­Leaks, entitled “WikiLeaks puts neutrality in the Dustbin of History”, the Swedish elite’s vaunted reputation for neutrality is exposed as a sham. Another US cable reveals that “the extent of [Sweden’s military and intelligence] co-operation [with Nato] is not widely known” and unless kept secret “would open the government to domestic criticism”.

    The Swedish foreign minister, Carl Bildt, played a notorious leading role in George W Bush’s Committee for the Liberation of Iraq and retains close ties to the Republican Party’s extreme right. According to the former Swedish director of public prosecutions Sven-Erik Alhem, Sweden’s decision to seek the extradition of Assange on allegations of sexual misconduct is “unreasonable and unprofessional, as well as unfair and disproportionate”. Having offered himself for questioning, Assange was given permission to leave Sweden for London where, again, he offered to be questioned. In May, in a final appeal judgment on the extradition, Britain’s Supreme Court introduced more farce by referring to non-existent “charges”.

    Accompanying this has been a vituperative personal campaign against Assange. Much of it has emanated from the Guardian, which, like a spurned lover, has turned on its besieged former source, having hugely profited from WikiLeaks disclosures. With not a penny going to Assange or WikiLeaks, a Guardian book has led to a lucrative Hollywood movie deal. The authors, David Leigh and Luke Harding, gratuitously abuse Assange as a “damaged personality” and “callous”. They also reveal the secret password he had given the paper which was designed to protect a digital file containing the US embassy cables. On 20 August, Harding was outside the Ecuadorean embassy, gloating on his blog that “Scotland Yard may get the last laugh”. It is ironic, if entirely appropriate, that a Guardian editorial putting the paper’s latest boot into Assange bears an uncanny likeness to the Murdoch press’s predictable augmented bigotry on the same subject. How the glory of Leveson, Hackgate and honourable, independent journalism doth fade.

    Not a fugitive

    His tormentors make the point of Assange’s persecution. Charged with no crime, he is not a fugitive from justice. Swedish case documents, including the text messages of the women involved, demonstrate to any fair-minded person the absurdity of the sex allegations – allegations almost entirely promptly dismissed by the senior prosecutor in Stockholm, Eva Finne, before the intervention of a politician, Claes Borgström. At the pre-trial of Bradley Manning, a US army investigator confirmed that the FBI was secretly targeting the “founders, owners or managers of WikiLeaks” for espionage.

    Four years ago, a barely noticed Pentagon document, leaked by WikiLeaks, described how WikiLeaks and Assange would be destroyed with a smear campaign leading to “criminal prosecution”. On 18 August, the Sydney Morning Herald disclosed, in a Freedom of Information release of official files, that the Australian government had repeatedly received confirmation that the US was conducting an “unprecedented” pursuit of Assange and had raised no objections. Among Ecuador’s reasons for granting asylum is Assange’s abandonment “by the state of which he is a citizen”. In 2010, an investigation by the Australian Federal Police found that Assange and WikiLeaks had committed no crime. His persecution is an assault on us all and on freedom.

     

     

     

     

    New Statesman

  • The spectacular rise and fall of Asil Nadir

    The spectacular rise and fall of Asil Nadir

    Asil Nadir turned Polly Peck into a shareholders dream, until the company collapsed amid accusations of fraud

     

    Jason Rodrigues

    guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 22 August 2012 14.01 BST

    Asil Nadir director of Po 008

    Asil Nadir, director of Polly Peck.

    Asil Nadir, director of Polly Peck, during the company’s heyday. Photograph: Tony Mcgrath/Picture library

    Though not entirely a rags to riches story, a young Asil Nadir once sold newspapers on the streets of Northern Cyprus before moving to Istanbul to study economics at university. During his college days, he supported himself by performing with his band, The Asils.

    On graduating in 1963, Nadir moved to London’s east end, a journey his family had already made from Cyprus. Before long, Asil made his mark in the rag trade as chairman of garment firm Wearwell, before turning the loss-making ladies fashion group Polly Peck into a business empire.

    Polly Peck sold Published in the Guardian on 14 February 1980, click on image for full story

    He added packaging, electronics and fresh produce companies to the Polly Peck conglomerate, which later became listed as a FTSE 100 company.

    Polly Peck’s rapid growth saw its value rise to £2 billion, making City traders fall in love with it during the boom times of the 1980s, some in the Square Mile calling it “wonder stock”. By 1990, Nadir was in the Sunday Times rich list, and a generous donor to Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government.

    Polly Peck shares Published in the Guardian on 25 October 1990, click on image for full story

    Then in August 1990, in a move that baffled the city, Nadir tried to buy up Polly Peck shares from investors, only to retreat from this position days later. It was too late: Nadir had spooked the market and Polly Peck’s shares plunged. The value of Nadir’s personal holding was rumoured to have dropped by more than £160m.

    Worse was to come, when trading in Polly Peck was suspended and Nadir was quizzed by the Serious Fraud Office. When Polly Peck was forced into liquidation in October 1990, its creditors were owed £1.3bn.

    PP fraud Published in the Guardian on 21 September 1990, click on image for full story

    Nadir, who has always denied the 66 charges of false accounting and theft made against him, was alleged to have secretly transferred £34m out of the company, leading to its collapse.

    In 1993, just days before he was due to face charges, Nadir was driven to an airfield near London, boarded a waiting business jet and fled to his native Northern Cyprus – which has no extradition treaty with Britain.

    In 2010, having evaded the British courts for nearly 20 years, Nadir flew back to the UK, and declared himself delighted at the prospect of finally standing trial and “clearing his name”.

    At his trial at the Old Bailey in 2012, Asil Nadir was found guilty of 10 charges involving the theft of millions of pounds from his Polly Peck empire.

    The jury found him not guilty on three counts – all similar theft offences.

     

    via The spectacular rise and fall of Asil Nadir | From the Guardian | guardian.co.uk.

  • Tariq Ali, Ex-U.K. Ambassador Craig Murray Praise Ecuador for Granting Asylum to Julian Assange

    Tariq Ali, Ex-U.K. Ambassador Craig Murray Praise Ecuador for Granting Asylum to Julian Assange

    tarik azizShortly before Julian Assange spoke on Sunday, a number of his supporters spoke outside the Ecuadorean embassy. Speakers included writer and activist Tariq Ali, as well as Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. Murray, a whistleblower himself, was removed from office in 2004 after he exposed how the United States and Britain supported torture by the Uzbek regime. “The fact that [British Foreign Secretary] William Hague now openly threatens the Ecuadoreans with the invasion of their sovereign premises is one further example of a total abandonment of the very concept of international law by the neoconservative juntas that are currently ruling the former Western democracies,” Murray says.

    Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. He was removed from office in 2004 after he exposed how the United States and Britain supported torture by the Uzbek regime.

    Tariq Ali, British-Pakistani author and activist. He is editor of New Left Review and author of many books, including Pirates of the Caribbean: Axis of Hope.

     

    Transcript

    AMY GOODMAN: There have been a number of developments surrounding the Julian Assange case over the weekend. The Organization of American States has voted to hold a meeting next Friday to discuss the diplomatic crisis between Ecuador and Britain. The OAS vote was 23 to three, with five abstentions. The United States, Canada, and Trinidad and Tobago opposed the resolution. On Friday, Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa defended his decision to grant Julian Assange asylum.

    PRESIDENT RAFAEL CORREA: [translated] The fundamental factor for granting political asylum to Mr. Julian Assange was because there was no guarantee that he would not be extradited to a third country—nothing to do with blocking the Swedish criminal investigation over the supposed crime. Nothing. It is not that I agree with everything that Julian Assange has done. But does he deserve the death penalty, life imprisonment, to be extradited to a third country for this? Please, what’s the balance between the crime and the punishment, the offense and the punishment? What about due process? I want to point that out because they’re already misrepresenting things. I look for when I said that the only thing that Julian Assange did was use his freedom of expression, etc. We aren’t denying that he might have committed an offense, but he should be tried with due process.

    AMY GOODMAN: Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa speaking Friday. Shortly before Julian Assange spoke Sunday, a number of his supporters also took to the microphone outside the Ecuadorean embassy in London. Among the speakers, writer and activist Tariq Ali, as well as Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. Murray, a whistleblower himself, was removed from office in 2004 after he exposed how the United States and Britain supported torture by the Uzbek regime. On Sunday, Ambassador Murray criticized the British government for threatening to raid the embassy to arrest Julian Assange.

    CRAIG MURRAY: The Vienna Convention is absolutely plain. The Vienna Convention of 1961 is the single most subscribed international treaty in existence, and it states in Article 22, Section 1, that the diplomatic premises of an embassy are inviolable. Full stop. Are inviolable. You cannot invade the embassy of another country. As Tariq rightly said, there were times when I sheltered Uzbek dissidents from their government within the confines of the British embassy in Uzbekistan. Even during the height of the tensions of the Cold War, the opposing parties never entered each other’s embassies to abduct a dissident. The fact that William Hague now openly threatens the Ecuadoreans with the invasion of their sovereign premises is one further example of a total abandonment of the very concept of international law by the neoconservative juntas that are currently ruling the former Western democracies. […]

    And I can tell you something else for certain: the position I’ve just outlined, that the invasion of a diplomatic premises is a crime in international law and a crime in the state whose premises are invaded, that is the position which is taken by virtually every country in the world, and it is a crime which is eminently extraditable. So any policeman who forcibly enters the premises of the embassy of Ecuador will find himself liable for extradition to Ecuador as soon as he leaves the United Kingdom.

    Ladies and gentlemen, I thank you all for coming here to listen. I thank deeply and from my heart those of you who have come to support Julian Assange and support his continuing struggle for freedom and to support the continuing cause of whistleblowing and revealing that which government does not want you to know. We are here today for freedom. Here we stand. We thank the Ecuadorean government for their support, and we stand with Julian Assange. Thank you very much.

    AMY GOODMAN: Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. He was a whistleblower himself, removed from office in 2004 exposing how the United States and Britain supported torture by the Uzbek regime. He was speaking outside the Ecuadorean mission—the Ecuadorean embassy in London. We now turn to Tariq Ali, the famed British-Pakistani author, who also spoke outside the embassy, praising Ecuador’s decision to grant Julian Assange political asylum.

    TARIQ ALI: And so, the social—radical social democratic governments in South America are today—in my opinion, offer more social and human rights to their citizens than the countries of Europe, leave alone the United States. And that is why Julian Assange applies for asylum to Ecuador, because this is a country which is determined to be independent. It has asked the American military base in Manta to leave the country. And when the United States objected, Rafael Correa, the president of Ecuador, said, “OK, if you want a base here, let’s have equality. Why can’t we have a military base in Florida?” To even ask the question is considered crazy. And there was no agreement. Out went the base.

    A new constitution that defends human rights. A serious attempt to defend the ecology of the country. Social spending has doubled. And, for me, human rights mean nothing unless there’s social rights, as well, for the ordinary people of a country. The two go hand in hand. And it is these changes in South America which have now come to the fore in a big way by this one event, but that is why Julian Assange appealed to Ecuador for asylum, and that is why I think in this week that lies ahead he will receive the backing of a large majority of the South American continent.

    And the Europeans, European governments and European citizens, if they wish to, could learn a lot from South America today. Just change your gaze. The gaze of Europe is constantly fixed in the direction of North America. They should just shift it, at least for a year or two, to South America, and maybe conditions in the lives of ordinary people who live in Europe would be improved as a result. Instead, despite this huge social and economic crisis, they go on as if nothing’s happened. Well, for them, nothing’s happened. For ordinary people who live in this country, whatever their class, their creed, their color, they suffer. And they react angrily sometimes. And South America offers the beginnings of a model against that.

    AMY GOODMAN: British-Pakistani writer and activist Tariq Ali, speaking outside the Ecuadorean embassy in London. And you can go to our website at democracynow.org to get the full addresses outside the embassy.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Democracy Now

  • UK : Pc charged with keeping a brothel

    UK : Pc charged with keeping a brothel

    UKNews060820121247538 11

    A police officer has been charged with keeping a brothel, misconduct in a public office and a drugs offence, his employers said.

    Northumbria Police Constable Philip Tate, 37, faces nine charges and has appeared before Newcastle Crown Court after being charged on May 28.

    He faces five counts of misconduct in a public office, one of supplying a class C drug, one of money laundering, one of keeping a brothel and one offence under the Consumer Credit Act, a force spokeswoman said.

    “As the case is currently going through the courts, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time,” she said.

    At a preliminary hearing held previously, Tate and two co-accused were granted bail.

    The Pc, currently suspended, will appear before the same court in October for a plea and case management hearing.

     

     

     

     

     

    Press Association

  • Coca-Cola CEO ‘who is of a Turkish origin’: ‘The Olympics needs sponsors to flourish’

    Coca-Cola CEO ‘who is of a Turkish origin’: ‘The Olympics needs sponsors to flourish’

    Muhtar kentIn a rare interview, Muhtar Kent, Coca-Cola chief executive, explains why the Games’ backers deserve credit and outlines his company’s future plans.

    As far as Muhtar Kent is concerned, understand the new Coca-Cola vending machine, Freestyle, and you understand the business. The machine is so important to Coke it has copyrighted the name.

    The Freestyle machine, designed by Pininfarina, sells up to 100 different Coke products using pharmaceutical micro-dosing technology. It is in widespread use in America and is being tested in the UK. It is much greener than its predecessor, the old vending machine that used heavy bags of syrup base and provided consumers with a choice of eight. Its development is Coke’s story in a microcosm.

    That story is about choice, choice, and more choice. Followed by innovation. And then some more choice tacked on at the end – normal, low calorie, no calorie, ready made, syrup, coffee, tea, juice, energy drinks, water.

    Coke used to make one drink. It now has 500 brands and 3,000 products. It makes drinks you can have in the early morning, the late morning, for elevenses, over lunch, after lunch, in the afternoon, in the early evening, in the late evening.

    Markets have been segmented and re-segmented, layer upon layer of different offers to different consumer groups, from New York to Chongqing, Bristol to Durban, Rio de Janeiro to Hyderabad. Coca-Cola is available in more than 200 countries throughout the world. The United Nations has 192 members.

    Turn up in almost any corner of the world and rest assured you will not be very far from a guy with a trolley selling Coke. Virgin tried, and failed, to break into the cola market in the 1990s, blown out of the water by Coke which launched aggressive advertising campaigns and brand pushes against the young upstart.

    Sir Richard Branson said the lesson he learnt was: “I’ll never again make the mistake of thinking that all large, dominant companies are sleepy.”

    As arch-rival PepsiCo struggles to retain market share and Reutersdescribes its share price as “languishing”, Coca-Cola seemingly goes from strength to strength.

    Last month, it revealed higher-than-expected second-quarter profits as strong emerging-market sales offset European decline. If you are not expanding, Kent says, you don’t have much of a business. He calls it “cracking the calculus for growth”.

    “We have made sure that we have not wasted this crisis,” says Kent, who has been Coke’s chairman and chief executive since April 2009.

    “Back in 2009 we developed a zero-waste programme – cut out all duplications, cut out all unnecessary expenses and re-allocate those funds to continue to invest in our brands through the crisis.

    “Not save our way to prosperity – which you can’t – but invest our way to prosperity. We have increased our investments counter-intuitively at a time when normal logic would say cut. That has worked for us.

    “This is a crisis unlike some in the past. It is not going to go away quickly, unemployment is not going to come down quickly, volatility and uncertainty in the macro-sense is here to stay for a while, I think at least for the next three years. One will not be able to say we are out of the crisis – it may even take longer.”

    Kent is in the UK for the Olympics, with Coca-Cola taking over the Langham Hotel in central London for the duration of the Games. The company has been sponsoring the Olympics since 1928 and is the longest continuous commercial partner of the Games. It also sponsors the Olympic Torch, the Paralympics and the Special Olympics, of which is was a founding partner.

    Kent doesn’t really do negative, he is American after all. But a sense of irritation does infuse his words as he tackles head-on the main criticisms of the Olympic sponsors – makers of sugary drinks shouldn’t have such a high profile at the world’s biggest sporting event and corporate control means that the Olympic spirit is lost under a welter of lawyers’ letters on whether a baker can make a cake with the Olympic rings on it or someone can bring a can of Pepsi into the Olympic Park.

    Kent says the criticisms miss the point. If it wasn’t for the major sponsors putting tens of millions of pounds into the Olympics every year (Coke refuses to say how much) the Games would not exist in their present form. He also points out that Coke has moved a long way from the days when it made one drink called Coke and sold it around the world.

    “Take a country like Britain,” Kent says. “Twenty years ago, everything sold under the Coca-Cola trade mark would be with full calories. Today, 20 years later, 40pc sold under the Coca-Cola trade mark are with no calories.

    “I would say [to the critics] ‘show me another category of branded food or branded fast-moving consumer goods that have been able to innovate to the level where 40pc and going up are calorie free’.”

    Kent argues that Coke has a series of major health campaigns including Street Games which involves 100,000 young people in Britain. People have a choice about what they drink and even a choice about how much they exercise.

    “You have to raise awareness,” Kent says simply. “There is a need for energy balance, so people spend more energy, spend more calories. One of the biggest issues in society is that society moves less.”

    On sponsorship, Coke argues that the company must have some protection of its intellectual property. It supports smaller businesses in other ways, often through the supply chain.

    Its main adverts during the past week have focused on employment in the UK, saying that 97.5pc of Coke products sold in Britain are made in the country in factories stretching from Sidcup in Kent to East Kilbride in Scotland.

    Coke employs 4,700 people in the UK, with a multiplier effect adding another 40,000 to that in associated supplier roles.

    “I think there is a fine balance,” Kent says on the protection of rights. “But at the same time, it is wrong to say you should provide total freedom and not have any IP control and not have any protection of our intellectual rights. There is a fine line between protecting the small guys and giving them opportunities and protecting intellectual property rights and brands.

    “In today’s world, many countries may not be able to put teams together [if there wasn’t the level of sponsorship presently available].

    “A big portion of all the funds generated through partners like Coca-Cola and others are channelled through the International Olympic Committee back to the countries, which helps the Olympic movement and national Olympic committees.

    “You can’t just say, ‘I’ll take all the benefit and I’m always going to be critical’. There has to be a balanced approach.”

    Francois Hollande, the French president, poked his baguette into the debate when he said that the hundreds of seats left empty at various venues were because the London organisers had given away too many tickets to sponsors, a mistake he said the French would never make. “The problem is that there are simply too many corporate seats,” he argued.

    Kent, speaking before Hollande’s interjection, would beg to differ. “We have a very, very high usage of tickets allocated to us so I’m not sure if there are empty seats where that is emanating from. Is it price, is it the local spectators?”.

    Most reports have said the empty seats have appeared because national Olympic federations have not used up their allocations.

    And far from giving all its seats to men in suits (Kent points out he hasn’t worn a tie all week), Coke insists that much of the allocation has gone to customers, “future flames” – Cokes partnership with young people at a community level – and partners such as suppliers.

    Kent admits it is a changing world and that for consumer-focused companies there has to be a visible commitment to issues such as sustainability that motivate consumers and particularly the young.

    Speaking at a conference earlier this year, Joe Tripodi, Coke’s executive vice president and head of global marketing, argued that the company and its investors have to become used to talking about a different kind of EPS – not earnings per share, but a partnership bringing together the economics of the business, the partnerships in the supply chain and the social value of the business.

    “If you’re not doing all three, it’s no longer optimal, it’s no longer acceptable, even, to just build value for yourself and not build value for broader society,” Tripodi said.

    Critics may dismiss such ideas as so many warm words, but Kent argues that in today’s global and inter-connected worlds, companies that do not play by the new rule book will soon be found out. He talks about “expressions of support” rather than simple sales.

    “Because of social media and the strength of social media, it is no longer important to just create positive news and tell people that,” Kent says.

    “People like to talk about something once they believe in it. That is why sustainability is so important. Consumers no longer vote for a product or buy a product because it tastes good. That is not enough any more. They want to essentially believe in the character of the company. They want to associate themselves with the character of the company. That is why sustainability is no longer a corporate social responsibility report.

    “Our Facebook page, which is the largest Facebook page in the world for any brand, is not managed by us, it is managed by two people who created it.

    “You have to have a lot of courage to let that happen as not everything that is said on that page is positive. But it would never have been the biggest Facebook page in the world if we managed it. We know that.”

    Kent is aware that after the financial crash of 2007 and 2008, public suspicion of business and even the functioning of capitalism itself has raised a number of difficult issues for corporates.

    In the UK, if not in America, the very concept of profit and levels of remuneration are regularly questioned. Frank Luntz, the Republican polling expert, has spoken of an increasing suspicion of “elites”, whether in politics or business.

    “I think there has never been a time in the world where people on the street – it doesn’t matter whether you are in San Francisco or New York or London or Lyon – have had this low level of trust in institutions, including business, government, civil society organisations, NGOs, education, health. The level of trust is really bad. That is why the ‘golden triangle’ is so important,” says Kent.

    “The future world of successful governments, successful businesses and successful NGOs and civil society organisations lies in their ability to be able to increase effective collaboration between government, business and civil society.

    “Each of us have a role to play here. Societal problems that face us, take obesity, are not going to be solved only by government, not going to be solved only by businesses, only by NGOs. It is going to take a major collaborative effort to increase awareness.”

    Coke has its own “Big Hairy Audacious Goal”, as defined by Tripodi – to double the size of its business in a decade. The company’s 2020 Vision mapped out 2pc to 4pc growth in volume of products sold, 6pc to 8pc growth in operating income and “high single-digit” earnings growth.

    Surely, in a world struggling to find growth momentum, those are pretty punchy figures?

    “[This is the] fastest-growing FMCG [fast moving consumer goods] sector in the world,” Kent says.

    “Non-alcoholic ready-to-drink beverages are growing at a clip of 4pc to 5pc. We are in a growth industry. No matter how bad the macro-economics are, in the world today versus 10 years from now, there is going to be another 800m or so people coming in to the middle class. Where are these people going to come from?

    “Obviously from Africa, Latin America and Asia – the bulk of them. Then another 700m to 800m people are going to move from rural areas to urban areas and migration will continue.

    “So, that’s almost a billion, urbanised middle class coming into the world that doesn’t exist today – that generates a tremendous demand. We feel we are the best poised to capture that growth.

    “In the last three years, we’ve captured 40pc of the growth – much larger than our fair share. And we feel we can continue to do that. That’s what gives us confidence.”

    He says that Coke is in “bolt-on” mode and is interested in targets similar to the recent $980m (£632m) acquisition of the Middle East drinks company Aujan.

    Coke already has a majority stake in the British fruit-smoothie maker Innocent, and that could grow. “We have the evolving right that continues into the future that we would own more than now,” Kent says when asked if Coke wants to wholly own the company.

    “Currently we own the majority and we manage it jointly with the founders. We have a great position and it is doing very well and nothing will change [for the company] if we own more than the current amount of the shares. We are in a good place that everyone is very happy with.”

    There have also been reports that Coke is looking at a major sponsorship deal with Formula One, rumours that Kent does not deny or confirm.

    “We have wonderful events that we are long time supporters of, such as the Olympics, Fifa World Cup and many other programmes like NASCAR and tennis in the United States,” he says.

    “So, there have always been rumours [about F1] and they’ll stay rumours.”

    Kent is American and a chief executive, so confidence is built into his DNA. He says this will be the greenest Games ever for Coke, with every bottle produced recycled and back on the streets within six weeks, the fastest ever turnaround.

    He says the company will continue to pump its millions of dollars into the Games and is already looking ahead to Rio de Janeiro in 2016. On the corporate front, many believe that Coke will continue to stick it to PepsiCo.

    “There is a tendency at times to get a lot of unfair criticism,” he says of the view held by some that “big business” must in some way always be bad.

    “Sometimes we don’t get all the credit. But I do believe that we have an inherent belief that you should ‘do’ first before you talk. And eventually people will understand.”

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Telegraph

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Telegraph

  • Turkish investor KOC sponsors UKTI’s British business showcase

    Turkish investor KOC sponsors UKTI’s British business showcase

    Koc olympics

    The largest Turkish investor in the UK, Beko PLC, has announced it will sponsor the terrace pavilion at UKTI’s British Business Embassy at Lancaster House.

    The British Business Embassy is expected to generate £1bn in benefits to the UK economy by showcasing the best of UK innovation to top UK and international business, and government leaders.

    Sponsorship of the pavilion will take place across the duration of the Olympic and Paralympic games, as the Global Investment Conference on July 26 will kick off the showcasing.

    Following the conference a series of 17 high-growth sector and country days with thousands of prominent UK and international businesses registered to attend.

    Levent Çakıroğlu, President of Koç Holding Consumer Durables Group and CEO of Beko PLC’s parent company Arçelik A.Ş., will be attending the Global Investment Conference, joining 200 global financial and business leaders, Government ministers, investors and policy makers.

    Ragip Balcioğlu, Managing Director of Beko PLC, announcing the sponsorship said: “As a UK-based company, Beko is proud to be supporting the Government’s Olympic trade and investment initiative. This activity is part of the company’s commitment to work closely with the British Government to increase trade and investment ties between the UK and Turkey.

    “This sponsorship comes at a time when the Beko brand in the UK continues to go from strength to strength. We feel very honoured that Beko has been accepted by British consumers and become one of the leading white goods brands as a result.

    “We are now the market leaders in washing machine, refrigeration and freestanding cooker categories and we take great pride in the UK awards we have received for innovation, quality and distribution.”

     

    B Daily Business Network