Category: Non-EU Countries

  • Councils apologise over ‘British Fritzl’ failures

    Councils apologise over ‘British Fritzl’ failures

    Councils, health officials and police yesterday apologised for failing to take action against a man who repeatedly raped and abused his two daughters for over three decades

    British Fritz

    A serious case review published yesterday condemned councils, NHS and police in south Yorkshire and Lincolnshire for a catalogue of failures over 35 years of torment.

    The incest carried on despite the authorities receiving numerous complaints over the years that the abuse was going on.

    The man, 57, now serving life in jail, fathered nine of his own grandchildren. Eventually it took one of his victims to come forward and make a direct allegation before he was arrested, in 2008.

    Sue Fiennes, chairman of Sheffield Safeguarding Children Board, said: “We want to apologise to the family at the heart of this case. It is clear that we failed this family.”

    Despite the failings it emerged that none of the 100 professionals, working for 28 agencies, who had contact with the family, have been disciplined.

    The Telegraph

  • The NHS: Health care needs to be depoliticised and patient led

    The NHS: Health care needs to be depoliticised and patient led

    Reforming the NHS is so vital that we shouldn’t have to wait until after the next election, says Helen Evans .

    Gordon Brown

    With the NHS again moving centre stage in the run-up to the general election, the mainstream political parties will be quick to reassure voters that nationalised health care will only be safe in their hands. Indeed, we have already seen campaign messages from David Cameron’s Conservatives promising that they will “cut the deficit, not the NHS”.

    However, in reality, the UK’s structural financial situation is now so dire that the NHS will have to be substantively overhauled, irrespective of who wins the next general election or whatever they say beforehand. Rather than simply wait for the next government, Nurses for Reform (NFR) believes that as front-line carers, nurses must now put the case for a fundamentally different and better health-care system.

    That is why NFR not only recognises the urgent need for reform, it also believes too many nursing and medical trade unions remain wedded to fundamentally old and outdated ideas. Instead of promoting substantive reform – and in doing so, championing the rights of patients and consumers – they predictably default to the short-term platitudes of demanding more taxpayers’ money or new forms of legislative favour. Such an approach is not only disastrous for nurses and the other medical professions, it is also catastrophic for patients.

    NFR believes that the next government must liberate health provision from the costly and counterproductive world of top-down and un-innovative state control. On a practical level, this means a detailed consideration of the following key points:

    • All health provision in the UK, such as hospitals, clinics and care homes, should be placed in the independent sector, be it for-profit, co-operative, or not-for-profit forms of ownership. What matters here is genuine diversity and openness.
    • Following the logic of planned Conservative Party changes to education and schools, local planning laws must be reformed in order to enable a much greater diversity of – and non-government investment in – health facilities. In a truly post-bureaucratic age, the Secretary of State for Health should no longer have any say over when or where hospitals are built, opened or closed, and nor should local politicians.
    • The laws surrounding health censorship should be repealed so that patients can be empowered with much greater information. In this context, hospitals, GP practices and pharmaceutical enterprises should all be free to advertise and build trusted brands. Only by allowing reputations to be freely built will people be able to realise the advantages of competitive standards and judge for themselves who they can trust in a health-care market.
    • National collective pay- bargaining for health professionals should be ended, monopoly bodies such as the General Medical Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council should be opened up to genuine private alternatives, and all health-related training should be paid for by independent providers – thereby boosting the diversity and opportunities available in a more vibrant labour market.
    • Finally, tax-funded “public health” should regain the trust of people by only concerning itself with those areas that specifically overlap with, and are akin to, warfare: for example, natural disasters and pandemics. Beyond these limits, any further health initiatives aimed at informing or nannying people should only be undertaken by independent-sector organisations, be they for-profit or not-for-profit, and providing they do not use any taxpayers’ money in their execution. All initiatives should be created and funded without any involvement from any aspect of the public sector, again including local government.

    Today, more than ever, such a package of reforms is necessary so that health care is finally depoliticised and led by the people who matter most: patients as consumers. In short, we can do a lot better than the NHS without ever going the way of highly regulated and state-funded American health care. What we need is a genuine market.

    The Telegraph

  • Chatham House Prize 2010

    Chatham House Prize 2010

    All members are now invited to take part in choosing this year’s winner of the Chatham House Prize. The details of the three short-listed nominees can be found below. The award ceremony will take place in the autumn.

    PROCEED TO VOTING FORM >>

    Voting closes at 17.00 on Monday 15 March 2010. Members must be logged in to the website in order to vote.

    All those voting will be automatically entered into a draw for two pairs of free tickets for the award ceremony and dinner.

    Chatham House Prize 2010 Nominees

    HE Abdullah Gül, President of Turkey

    Abdullah Gül has been a significant figure for reconciliation and moderation within Turkey and internationally, and a driving force behind many of the positive steps that Turkey has taken in recent years.

    Mr Gül has worked to deepen Turkey’s traditional ties with the Middle East, mediate between the fractious groups in Iraq and bring together the Afghan and Pakistani leaderships to try to resolve disputes during 2009. He has also made significant efforts to reunify the divided island of Cyprus and has played a leading role, along with his Armenian counterpart, in accelerating the unprecedented search for reconciliation between Turkey and Armenia, including through the so-called ‘football diplomacy’.

    President Gül is an unwavering proponent of anchoring Turkey in the European Union. Under his leadership, Turkey has consolidated civilian democratic rule and pursued extensive political and legal reforms to bring the country closer to European standards of democracy and human rights.

    HE Christine Lagarde, Finance Minister, France

    Christine Lagarde has adeptly steered the French economy through stormy economic times while being a leading protagonist in efforts during 2009 to forge international consensus on reforming the international financial and monetary architecture.

    Ms Lagarde was a key spokesperson for the euro area on the international stage throughout the year. She consistently and eloquently promoted the need for debate on stronger and more effective regulation of the international financial and monetary system. In particular she pushed for the end of guaranteed bonus payouts, which some regarded as having encouraged excessive risk-­taking in the banking sector, and keeping a close watch on the openness of the international economy in the face of the rising risk of protectionism.

    Ms Lagarde’s credibility in financial matters has already been recognized by the Financial Times, which voted her European Finance Minister of the Year in 2009 for her handling of the financial crisis – as demonstrated by the greater resilience of the French economy relative to its European partners.

    Stjepan Mesić, President of Croatia (2000­-10)

    Stjepan Mesić has shown consistently strong and effective leadership in Croatia at a time when the country has been transformed into a modern democratic European state following the regional wars of the 1990s.

    During his two terms in office as President of Croatia the country evolved from a post­-war state on the fringes of Europe to one integrated into NATO and well advanced in negotiations to join the European Union.

    From early on in his presidency Mr Mesić showed courage in his efforts to foster better relations with Croatia’s neighbours. In the face of domestic criticism he sent alleged Croatian war criminals to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and dismissed a number of generals when they publicly protested against that decision, thereby setting the tone for the rest of his tenure and opening Croatia’s accession route to EU membership.

  • Britain has ‘no financial interest’ in Armenia

    Britain has ‘no financial interest’ in Armenia

    UJGreat Britain will not recognize the ‘Armenian genocide’ in the near future.

    Turkey is an important economic, political and strategic partner for Great Britain and as long as this continues, the issue of the Armenian genocide will not be on the agenda of the British parliament or government, the former British ambassador to Armenia, David Miller, said on 9 March, according to Aykakan zhamanak newspaper.

    Miller was speaking at the screening of a film about the Armenian genocide at the London School of Economics.

    ‘Armenia is not Azerbaijan with which Britain has financial interests. Armenia is not Georgia which is of great strategic importance. Armenia is interesting for Britain only in terms of the prevention of war in the region,’ Miller said.

    News-Armenia

  • Georgian Human Rights Groups Meet Western Diplomats

    Georgian Human Rights Groups Meet Western Diplomats

    Civil Georgia, Tbilisi / 10 Mar.2010

    Georgian human rights and advocacy groups met with British, French and U.S. ambassadors in Tbilisi on March 10 to convey their concerns regarding recent cases of, as they put it, targeting human rights groups and activists.

    Representatives from Human Rights Centre (HRC), Georgian Young Lawyers Association (GYLA) and Multinational Georgia, an umbrella organization for dozens of NGOs working on ethnic and religious minority issues, participated in the meeting held in the office of HRC.

    “There have been cases of direct or indirect pressure on activists and human rights groups and we wanted to inform ambassadors about these cases,” Ucha Nanuashvili, head of Human Rights Centre, said.

    He said, among other issues, the case of Arnold Stepanian, founder of Multinational Georgia and representative of Armenian community in Georgia, was raised during the meeting.

    Some Georgian media outlets alleged recently Stepanian was working for the Russian intelligence. Posts made by anonymous users on several Russian internet discussion forums were cited as source of information.

    One of such reports was aired recently by Tbilisi-based Real TV, a station going out in Tbilisi through cable. Its 9-minute long report on the issue opens with footage from a meeting of leaders of Alliance for Georgia (Irakli Alasania, Davit Usupashvili, Davit Gamkrelidze and Sozar Subari) with representatives of Armenian community, also attended by Arnold Stepanian; the footage is accompanied by voiceover saying: “Irakli Alasania, Davit Usupashvili, Davit Gamkrelidze and Sozar Subari are sitting alongside with a presumed special agent of Russia’s Federal Security Service Arnold Stepanian.

    In general targeting opposition politicians has become a hallmark of Real TV; but the way how the station does it has become a source of criticism from many journalist and media experts saying that the station’s reports are often mudslinging.

    After the meeting in HRC office, French Ambassador Eric Fournier told a reporter from Real TV: “Your channel has specifically targeted some members of the opposition to make a very cynical portrait of them and it has been considered as concern by many of us.”

    John Bass, the U.S. ambassador, said the meeting aimed at getting “first-hand impression, first-hand assessment” about the human rights landscape in Georgia.

    “It’s part of our broad interaction with wide range of organizations so that we can assess human rights situation as part of our broad commitment to help Georgia to realize its goals of membership in Euro-Atlantic community,” Bass said.

    Denis Keefe, the British ambassador, said work of human rights groups was “fundamental to Georgia’s democratic development.”

    “We have good cooperation with number of these NGOs… and we have very useful and serious discussion,” Keefe said.

    Ucha Nanuashvili of HRC said that another case raised with the diplomats was related to a long-time investigative journalist Vakhtang Komakhidze, who has requested asylum in Switzerland, citing pressure from the authorities.

    On February 26 eighteen human rights and advocacy groups released a joint statement expressing concern over, as they put it, smear campaign against them.

    “Information campaign against human rights organizations has intensified since December 2009. Those media outlets, which are either controlled by or have links with the authorities, have reported biased stories one after another, where some human rights groups were portrayed as the country’s enemies working against public interests,” a joint statement by 18 non-governmental organizations.

  • Great Britain for open Armenian-Turkish border

    Great Britain for open Armenian-Turkish border

    CharlesLonsdaleGreat Britain wants the South Caucasus countries to establish friendly relations with each other, as well as with their neighbors, British Ambassador to Armenia Charles Lonsdale told NEWS.am. He pointed out that Great Britain is for both the Armenian-Turkish protocols and reopening of the Armenian-Turkish border. The past must by no means be forgotten, but good neighborly relations must be established and maintained, the Ambassador said. Mr. Lonsdale pointed out that Armenia and Great Britain are both interested in the Armenian-Turkish border being reopened.

    Ambassador Lonsdale refused to comment on the approval of the Armenian Genocide resolution by the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs. He said that it us up to the U.S. Congress to make a decision.

    T.P.

    , 05/03/2010