Category: Non-EU Countries

  • Turkish President Gul To Visit Switzerland

    Turkish President Gul To Visit Switzerland

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul will travel to Switzerland on Thursday.

    241110 gul1A statement by Presidential Press Center said on Wednesday that Gul would pay a state visit to Switzerland upon invitation by Doris Leuthard, President of Swiss Confederation, on November 25 and 26.

    “Our relations with Switzerland gained a significant momentum in the recent years. The two parties have sound will and determination to boost bilateral ties and cooperation in the coming period,” the statement said.

    President Gul will be accompanied by Interior Minister Besir Atalay, Enviroment & Forestry Minister Veysel Eroglu, lawmakers and academicians during his visit.

    Gul will hold talks with President Leuthard, the Council of States President Erika Forster-Vannini and other officials.

    AA

  • Cyprus: Time for formal partition?

    Cyprus: Time for formal partition?

    For more than three decades now, efforts to resolve the territorial dispute in Cyprus between its Greek and Turkish residents have failed. Since reunification plans have been rejected, is it time to officially partition the island?

  • Universities in the UK: Muslims Need Not Apply

    Universities in the UK: Muslims Need Not Apply

    Nabil Ahmed – President of the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS) – guest writes about a new dilemma facing young British Muslims.
    With over 100,000 Muslim students in the UK now in higher education one would imagine that the future of Muslims in the UK, academically at least, would be extremely positive. Over the years the numbers of Muslim students attending university has rapidly progressed from a time when it was simply international students to a point now where the majority of Muslim students are British born and emerging as leaders of our communities. The importance of British Muslims who are able and willing to go to University cannot be understated.

    Through education we are living those timeless teachings that we all know: “Read! In the name of your Lord”, “Are those equal, those who know and those who do not know?”, “Behold! in the creation of the heavens and the Earth, and the alternation of night and day, there are indeed signs for people who have understanding”. Education is at the heart of a change of condition and the fulfilment of a command; at an individual as well as a collective level.

    Let us realise the particular immense value of higher education. Through educating our youth in Universities today we are insha’Allah planting a seed, where we will grow Muslims who are successful leaders, business people, academics, politicians, community leaders, scientists and so forth. We will insha’Allah through this develop individuals who are not only able to achieve and contribute from a level playing field in a country where many go to University, but who are also serious leaders able to tackle the challenges of our time and reform the world we live in.

    The UK’s reputation for providing world-class higher education and facilities is clearly evident and is something that Muslim students have long been privileged with. That four out of the top 10 universities in the world were UK-based institutions, with Cambridge knocking off Harvard from the top spot for the first time since 2004, is telling. Moreover, there are thousands who seek to apply each year to the country’s top institutions. For Muslims in the UK, it has almost been taken for granted that we will naturally enter higher education.

    However, this is where the good news stops. This could all change very quickly as government proposals seek to radically change the funding structures to higher education. As well as poorer communities, Muslim students in particular face being disproportionately affected by these proposals.

    Amid the global financial crisis, universities in the UK face major cuts to teaching budgets and the former system of a maximum £3,290 per year tuition fee has been deemed unsustainable. Thus the UK’s coalition government last week announced proposals that universities could charge students £9,000 a year, meaning students studying a 3 year university course could end up with an average debt of at £25,000 – before even considering the cost of living at University. Of particular concern for Muslim students is that any student loans taken out to pay for the tuition fees would have to be paid with a market-rate of interest of 3% plus inflation. This differs to the current system where student-loan interest is linked to the rate of inflation.

    These proposals are contrary to the pursuit of a fair and accessible education system and would increase social inequalities. The prospect of a £25,000 debt in university fees alone will not only serve to deter people from less advantaged backgrounds from applying to university, it will result in our highest quality institutions becoming financially ring-fenced, outside the reach of the majority of students.

    Secondly, these proposed changes will have a devastating impact on Muslim and black and minority ethnic (BME) communities who are under-represented in Higher Education and already face a number of barriers towards participation. The encouragement of BME and Muslim participation in Higher Education is crucial, however, if enforced, these proposals will further discourage Muslim students, a significant number of whom are from deprived backgrounds, from continuing onto university.

    Unlike the US, where high tuition fees are often subsidised by scholarships, the UK has only recently began charging students to enter into higher education, and as such, there are no effective systems or processes to ensure that the poor are not priced out of university. When one takes into consideration that the Muslim community is the poorest in the UK – nearly 50% of Pakistani and Bengali people in the UK are below the poverty line and are likely to earn less money than any other ethnic community – we can begin to see the dire ramifications of these new proposals.

    Finally, this issue is compounded by the market rate of interest on student loans, the main form of “assistance” provided by the government. In the past there has been a discussion in the Muslim community as to whether such loans are permissible, as the interest due would be paid back at the rate of inflation. However, at a market rate of interest of 3% plus inflation this is the point-of-no-return for a number of Muslim students.

    As responsible leaders we realise that this is an issue for communities around the UK; and in particular, we realise the impact on Muslim students. It is wrong for the poor to be priced out of education and face a debt of over £25,000 before even starting; education should be accessible to those able and willing, not just those that can afford it. And we realise that a market-rate of interest is no solution to rising debt-levels for students – interest is at the heart of social inequality and will only increase debt for all students. We cannot accept the door of higher education being shut to young Muslims.

    Unless of course, we work hard to prevent these proposals from being passed.

    The Federation of Student Islamic Societies has been working with a number of Muslim organisations, scholars, community leaders and the National Union of Students (NUS) to campaign against the proposals. The response has been fantastic, and in collaboration with the Muslim Council of Britain, we disseminated a khutbah to a number of Masaajid and university Islamic Societies on the topic.

    We have had phenomenal support from a number of scholars and community leaders, including Abu Eesa Niamatullah, who realise the significance of these proposals and the negative impact this will have on the Muslim community. The response from Islamic Societies has been equally impressive and in conjunction with FOSIS, many Islamic Societies have signed a joint statement expressing concern with the HE funding review. FOSIS have also been working closely with the NUS, highlighting the issue to raise concerns with MPs, and worked to get as many students to attend a national demonstration that took place on 10th November 2010 in Central London.

    We will continue to publicise the issue and work to campaign on behalf of Muslim students. We were interviewed by BBC News, and we hope that this is just the start, but we need your support!

    What can you do?

    It is vital that the Muslim community takes an active role in opposing these proposals and here are ways to get involved:

    * Lobby your local MP, particularly Liberal Democrat MPs who were looking to scrap tuition fees altogether before the general election
    * Raise awareness locally about the issue – for example, for a copy of the khutbah on education and higher education for Muslims please contact us (see below) – add this article to your Facebook or post-up Abu Eesa’s video
    * If you are a local institution or mosque please sign our statement (email to below)
    * Contact FOSIS and get involved in some of the initiatives we are running: vp.studentaffairs[@]fosis.org.uk
    …………………………………….UNN

  • David Cameron: waterboarding does not save lives

    David Cameron: waterboarding does not save lives

    Terrorism in the UK

    David Cameron has flatly contradicted George W Bush and said he does not believe that waterboarding, the controversial interrogation technique, saves lives.

    waterboard
    Protesters demonstrate the use of waterboarding in front of the Justice Department in Washington Photo: AP

    By Andrew Porter in Seoul

    The British prime minister, speaking at the G20 summit in South Korea, repeated the official British line that torture was wrong, and he went further, attacking policies pursued by the Bush administration on the detention and treatment of prisoners which he said had helped to radicalise people and made the West “less safe”.

    Mr Bush memoirs, which were published this week, asserted strongly that the waterboarding of prisoners had averted huge terrorist attacks on key London targets. The former US president also said that he did not believe that waterboarding constituted torture.

    In an interview on Thursday. Mr Cameron said he disagreed with Mr Bush, though he did not deal directly with the belief that specific attacks had been headed off. “Look, I think torture is wrong and I think we ought to be very clear about that,” Mr Cameron said. “And I think we should also be clear that if actually you’re getting information from torture, it’s very likely to be unreliable information.”

    When pressed on whether torture saves lives, he added: “I think there is both a moral reason for being opposed to torture – and Britain doesn’t sanction torture – but secondly I think there’s also an effectiveness thing … if you look at the effect of Guantánamo Bay and other things like that, long-term that has actually helped to radicalise people and make our country and our world less safe. So I don’t agree.”

    Mr Bush has claimed attacks on Canary Wharf and Heathrow airport were foiled as a result of the controversial interrogation technique. Speaking on the release of his book Decision Points, he said of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the supposed architect of 9/11: “We capture the guy, the chief operating officer of al-Qaeda, who kills 3,000 people. We felt he had the information about another attack. He says, ‘I’ll talk to you when I get my lawyer’. I say, ‘What options are available and legal?’”

    Last month, Sir John Sawers, the head of the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, said: “Torture is illegal and abhorrent under any circumstances and we have nothing whatsoever to do with it.” But the Foreign Office has accepted that information gained from waterboarding would be used if it could stop an imminent terrorist attack.

    Mr Bush’s views have run into opposition from a number of experts in the UK. Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, the former Director of Public Prosecutions said: “These stories about waterboarding thwarting attacks on Canary Wharf and Heathrow – I’ve never seen anything to substantiate these claims. It’s an easy claim to make, it’s much more difficult to prove. These claims are to be treated with a great deal of scepticism.”

    However US intelligence officials involved in the 9/11 investigation have said Mr Bush’s claim was supported by a welter of evidence, including a confession made by Mohammed to a military tribunal at Guantánamo Bay.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8126623/David-Cameron-waterboarding-does-not-save-lives.html, 11 Nov 2010


  • Turkey in the Axis of Radicalism? An Alternative View of Europe (Dedeoglu)

    Turkey in the Axis of Radicalism? An Alternative View of Europe (Dedeoglu)

    Sunday, November 14, 2010 at 7:32AM | Scott Lucas in EA Middle East and Turkey

    TURKEY EUWriting in Zaman, Professor Beril Dedeoglu of the University of Galatasaray in Istanbul intervenes in the discussion of whether Turkey has been aligning itself with non-Western powers under the rule of Justice and Development Party (AKP). Beyond questioning the existence of an ‘axis’, Dedeoglu asks if the real shift is occurring within the European Union, seeing a possible UK-French alliance v. a German-Russian front following a deep economic crisis:

    The term “axis shift” is used for countries that are supposedly changing their overall political positions, meaning that they abandon their current system of security and values to replace them with a new system.

    This term, which is used as a political tool, would have meaning if axes existed in the current global circumstances. Nevertheless, even if this political qualification is now used, it is not right to use it solely for Turkey; one must be able to test it elsewhere as well.

    The EU’s values and policies are dictated by the West’s stable and developed structures, which are marked by principles and rules. However, its practice does not always match the principle. The EU became what it is today because it has managed to regulate the rivalry between its members. Particularly in the security domain, rivalry has been thoroughly organized with every treaty and mechanism imaginable put in place in order to prevent one member state from becoming a security threat for another.

    However, the changing global conditions are pushing the member countries to progressively abandon the idea of mutual interdependence, which is at the basis of their partnership. Some serious problems have already started to appear, with the current economic and financial crisis stimulating debate over necessary reform in the security and defense architecture. Member states would like to reduce their defense spending without causing gaps in security, as they are afraid any such gap will be filled by the US.

    In order to find a solution, France and the UK have decided to make an agreement reminiscent of the Treaty of Dunkirk of 1947. For now, we do not know whether this will open a path to reunite the armed forces of these two countries, but we can say that this agreement symbolizes the beginning of a serious strategic cooperation. It is different from strategic cooperation initiatives witnessed elsewhere, such as the one between Turkey and Russia. The UK-France cooperation is more intense, and the two have not required a long process of confidence-building. It does not look like the cooperation between Turkey and Syria, either, as cooperation between the UK and France extends to the whole military domain rather than just a common fight against terrorism.

    Perhaps the first question to ask about the UK-France cooperation is which actors are expected to be disturbed by this rapprochement. History shows that we do not need to look far to get an answer. It seems that France has grown sufficiently away from de Gaulle’s approach to foreign policy and it is no longer filled with mistrust toward the UK. Maybe France hopes that an agreement with the UK will reduce Paris’ dependence on Germany. Such an effort risks replacing the German-French axis in Europe with another axis, one situated a little bit more to the north and with the US on one end. The UK’s new cabinet has already promised that they care about Europe more than their predecessors. Apparently they intend to keep that promise.

    If cooperation between France and the UK compels Germany to reinforce ties with Russia, then we will witness a real axis shift within the EU. If that happens, the debates on Turkey will also change as the “non à la Turquie” front collapses. The EU member countries may start competing with each other through Turkey, and some countries may stop refusing Turkey’s accession and while others increase their level of opposition.

    via EA WorldView – Home – Turkey in the Axis of Radicalism? An Alternative View of Europe (Dedeoglu).

  • Other Turkey holiday villas destinations ‘catching up on Mugla’

    Other Turkey holiday villas destinations ‘catching up on Mugla’

    Brits planning on villa holidays in Turkey have been told the country has much more to offer than just Mulga – currently the location of choice among UK travellers.

    villa holidays

    Izmir, Aydin, Canakkale, Bursa, Mersin, Edirne, the Black Sea, Eastern Anatolia, Cappadocia, Antalya and Istanbul are all worth a visit and are catching up on Mulga, according to the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism.

    Turkey offers all sorts of tourist alternatives, explained deputy undersecretary at the ministry Mr Ozgur Ozaslan, such as thermal and spa, congress, faith, gastronomy, yachting, winter sports and golf.

    “We wish to make our country even more attractive as a holiday destination to British tourists and we are working very hard to exhibit the myriad diverse offerings of our country,” he added.

    Mr Ozaslan went on to say that the country is investing heavily in the realms of sustainable tourism.

    His comments come after readers of Conde Nast Traveller magazine voted Turkey their favourite holiday destination.

    Posted by Iain Cliffe

    via Other Turkey holiday villas destinations ‘catching up on Mulga’.