Category: Non-EU Countries

  • The spectacular rise and fall of Asil Nadir

    The spectacular rise and fall of Asil Nadir

    Asil Nadir turned Polly Peck into a shareholders dream, until the company collapsed amid accusations of fraud

     

    Jason Rodrigues

    guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 22 August 2012 14.01 BST

    Asil Nadir director of Po 008

    Asil Nadir, director of Polly Peck.

    Asil Nadir, director of Polly Peck, during the company’s heyday. Photograph: Tony Mcgrath/Picture library

    Though not entirely a rags to riches story, a young Asil Nadir once sold newspapers on the streets of Northern Cyprus before moving to Istanbul to study economics at university. During his college days, he supported himself by performing with his band, The Asils.

    On graduating in 1963, Nadir moved to London’s east end, a journey his family had already made from Cyprus. Before long, Asil made his mark in the rag trade as chairman of garment firm Wearwell, before turning the loss-making ladies fashion group Polly Peck into a business empire.

    Polly Peck sold Published in the Guardian on 14 February 1980, click on image for full story

    He added packaging, electronics and fresh produce companies to the Polly Peck conglomerate, which later became listed as a FTSE 100 company.

    Polly Peck’s rapid growth saw its value rise to £2 billion, making City traders fall in love with it during the boom times of the 1980s, some in the Square Mile calling it “wonder stock”. By 1990, Nadir was in the Sunday Times rich list, and a generous donor to Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government.

    Polly Peck shares Published in the Guardian on 25 October 1990, click on image for full story

    Then in August 1990, in a move that baffled the city, Nadir tried to buy up Polly Peck shares from investors, only to retreat from this position days later. It was too late: Nadir had spooked the market and Polly Peck’s shares plunged. The value of Nadir’s personal holding was rumoured to have dropped by more than £160m.

    Worse was to come, when trading in Polly Peck was suspended and Nadir was quizzed by the Serious Fraud Office. When Polly Peck was forced into liquidation in October 1990, its creditors were owed £1.3bn.

    PP fraud Published in the Guardian on 21 September 1990, click on image for full story

    Nadir, who has always denied the 66 charges of false accounting and theft made against him, was alleged to have secretly transferred £34m out of the company, leading to its collapse.

    In 1993, just days before he was due to face charges, Nadir was driven to an airfield near London, boarded a waiting business jet and fled to his native Northern Cyprus – which has no extradition treaty with Britain.

    In 2010, having evaded the British courts for nearly 20 years, Nadir flew back to the UK, and declared himself delighted at the prospect of finally standing trial and “clearing his name”.

    At his trial at the Old Bailey in 2012, Asil Nadir was found guilty of 10 charges involving the theft of millions of pounds from his Polly Peck empire.

    The jury found him not guilty on three counts – all similar theft offences.

     

    via The spectacular rise and fall of Asil Nadir | From the Guardian | guardian.co.uk.

  • Tariq Ali, Ex-U.K. Ambassador Craig Murray Praise Ecuador for Granting Asylum to Julian Assange

    Tariq Ali, Ex-U.K. Ambassador Craig Murray Praise Ecuador for Granting Asylum to Julian Assange

    tarik azizShortly before Julian Assange spoke on Sunday, a number of his supporters spoke outside the Ecuadorean embassy. Speakers included writer and activist Tariq Ali, as well as Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. Murray, a whistleblower himself, was removed from office in 2004 after he exposed how the United States and Britain supported torture by the Uzbek regime. “The fact that [British Foreign Secretary] William Hague now openly threatens the Ecuadoreans with the invasion of their sovereign premises is one further example of a total abandonment of the very concept of international law by the neoconservative juntas that are currently ruling the former Western democracies,” Murray says.

    Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. He was removed from office in 2004 after he exposed how the United States and Britain supported torture by the Uzbek regime.

    Tariq Ali, British-Pakistani author and activist. He is editor of New Left Review and author of many books, including Pirates of the Caribbean: Axis of Hope.

     

    Transcript

    AMY GOODMAN: There have been a number of developments surrounding the Julian Assange case over the weekend. The Organization of American States has voted to hold a meeting next Friday to discuss the diplomatic crisis between Ecuador and Britain. The OAS vote was 23 to three, with five abstentions. The United States, Canada, and Trinidad and Tobago opposed the resolution. On Friday, Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa defended his decision to grant Julian Assange asylum.

    PRESIDENT RAFAEL CORREA: [translated] The fundamental factor for granting political asylum to Mr. Julian Assange was because there was no guarantee that he would not be extradited to a third country—nothing to do with blocking the Swedish criminal investigation over the supposed crime. Nothing. It is not that I agree with everything that Julian Assange has done. But does he deserve the death penalty, life imprisonment, to be extradited to a third country for this? Please, what’s the balance between the crime and the punishment, the offense and the punishment? What about due process? I want to point that out because they’re already misrepresenting things. I look for when I said that the only thing that Julian Assange did was use his freedom of expression, etc. We aren’t denying that he might have committed an offense, but he should be tried with due process.

    AMY GOODMAN: Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa speaking Friday. Shortly before Julian Assange spoke Sunday, a number of his supporters also took to the microphone outside the Ecuadorean embassy in London. Among the speakers, writer and activist Tariq Ali, as well as Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. Murray, a whistleblower himself, was removed from office in 2004 after he exposed how the United States and Britain supported torture by the Uzbek regime. On Sunday, Ambassador Murray criticized the British government for threatening to raid the embassy to arrest Julian Assange.

    CRAIG MURRAY: The Vienna Convention is absolutely plain. The Vienna Convention of 1961 is the single most subscribed international treaty in existence, and it states in Article 22, Section 1, that the diplomatic premises of an embassy are inviolable. Full stop. Are inviolable. You cannot invade the embassy of another country. As Tariq rightly said, there were times when I sheltered Uzbek dissidents from their government within the confines of the British embassy in Uzbekistan. Even during the height of the tensions of the Cold War, the opposing parties never entered each other’s embassies to abduct a dissident. The fact that William Hague now openly threatens the Ecuadoreans with the invasion of their sovereign premises is one further example of a total abandonment of the very concept of international law by the neoconservative juntas that are currently ruling the former Western democracies. […]

    And I can tell you something else for certain: the position I’ve just outlined, that the invasion of a diplomatic premises is a crime in international law and a crime in the state whose premises are invaded, that is the position which is taken by virtually every country in the world, and it is a crime which is eminently extraditable. So any policeman who forcibly enters the premises of the embassy of Ecuador will find himself liable for extradition to Ecuador as soon as he leaves the United Kingdom.

    Ladies and gentlemen, I thank you all for coming here to listen. I thank deeply and from my heart those of you who have come to support Julian Assange and support his continuing struggle for freedom and to support the continuing cause of whistleblowing and revealing that which government does not want you to know. We are here today for freedom. Here we stand. We thank the Ecuadorean government for their support, and we stand with Julian Assange. Thank you very much.

    AMY GOODMAN: Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. He was a whistleblower himself, removed from office in 2004 exposing how the United States and Britain supported torture by the Uzbek regime. He was speaking outside the Ecuadorean mission—the Ecuadorean embassy in London. We now turn to Tariq Ali, the famed British-Pakistani author, who also spoke outside the embassy, praising Ecuador’s decision to grant Julian Assange political asylum.

    TARIQ ALI: And so, the social—radical social democratic governments in South America are today—in my opinion, offer more social and human rights to their citizens than the countries of Europe, leave alone the United States. And that is why Julian Assange applies for asylum to Ecuador, because this is a country which is determined to be independent. It has asked the American military base in Manta to leave the country. And when the United States objected, Rafael Correa, the president of Ecuador, said, “OK, if you want a base here, let’s have equality. Why can’t we have a military base in Florida?” To even ask the question is considered crazy. And there was no agreement. Out went the base.

    A new constitution that defends human rights. A serious attempt to defend the ecology of the country. Social spending has doubled. And, for me, human rights mean nothing unless there’s social rights, as well, for the ordinary people of a country. The two go hand in hand. And it is these changes in South America which have now come to the fore in a big way by this one event, but that is why Julian Assange appealed to Ecuador for asylum, and that is why I think in this week that lies ahead he will receive the backing of a large majority of the South American continent.

    And the Europeans, European governments and European citizens, if they wish to, could learn a lot from South America today. Just change your gaze. The gaze of Europe is constantly fixed in the direction of North America. They should just shift it, at least for a year or two, to South America, and maybe conditions in the lives of ordinary people who live in Europe would be improved as a result. Instead, despite this huge social and economic crisis, they go on as if nothing’s happened. Well, for them, nothing’s happened. For ordinary people who live in this country, whatever their class, their creed, their color, they suffer. And they react angrily sometimes. And South America offers the beginnings of a model against that.

    AMY GOODMAN: British-Pakistani writer and activist Tariq Ali, speaking outside the Ecuadorean embassy in London. And you can go to our website at democracynow.org to get the full addresses outside the embassy.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Democracy Now

  • It Can not happen to Me Chapter 18

    It Can not happen to Me Chapter 18

    IT CAN NOT HAPPEN TO ME.  GUESS WHAT?  IT WILL!!!

    Chapter 18

    The SHADY SIDE OF SILVER

    While everyone seems to ignore the casino atmosphere of the securities markets worldwide, there is a time bomb about to explode.

    The volatility of the silver futures market is like bungee jumper without a rope.

    It seems a complex game, but when you break it down, we all going to pay the devil. We all know it is wrong, but few speak up.

    For starters , The Federal Reserve Board of the United States and other central bankers around the world are keeping their funds which they transact business with other member banks artificially low.   This was done during the banking crisis, but they have failed investigate the abuses.

    One glaring abuse is a major bank can “borrow” a million dollars and with high frequency trades [i]and short the  silver contracts on the COMEX .[ii] They are selling contracts that they do not own. Another scheme is to place factious orders to sell to scare the buyers away. This drops the bids temporarily low. In an nano second the computers cancels the sells and instead buy at the depressed prices. These trades place an artificial cap on the price. Now the computers , some instances are trading among themselves with no human benefit.

    AS is the case of silver, the industrial demand far outstrips the world’s supply. The total amount used is 755.7 million ounces. Here is the breakdown for industrial uses. One can quickly observe that over half is for industrial use.

    Silver has unlimited applications in science, industry and art plus investments. Total demand in 2010 was 487.4 million ounces for industrial use only. 167 million ounces were used  for jewelry and 101.3 million ounces  were used in medals and coins which were probably increased in 2012 because of the Olympics. Silver is used 1000 ounce bars for industrial use. There is about 1.25 billion ounces of silver in the entire world in 1000 bars. These bars are not just floating to be plucked out of thin air. They are often broken down for use in computers and solar panels and mirrors just to name a few.

    J P Morgan Chase was reported to be short 95 million ounces as of August 18, 2012. The 8 largest silver traders are short 40.9% of the entire COMEX future trading on a net basis. These contracts are in 1000 ounce bars. This will take over 100 trading days for them to cover(buy back) their shorts sales. This could be the straw that broke the camel’s back as far as inflation is concerned.

    When industrial users discover they might have a delivery problem they more than likely double order. This in itself will put added pressure on the shorts and send silver on a par with gold. There is three times more gold around than silver. If silver ever reached the price of gold, forget the Euro and everything else. Heaven Forbid!!!

    What one can do. Own silver  for cash only. NOW

    What the authorities must do  worldwide.

    Raise Interest rates NOW.

    Abolish margin rates NOW.

    Bring back the uptick rule NOW.

    Reinstate the usury laws NOW.

    Hire outside Law firms  that will sue or try violators ona contingency basis. There only fee will be a fee based upon a predetimined percentage of the judgement. If they loose – no fee.  This will give would be violators second thoughts of breaking laws.  

    Finally go back to chapter one and review every chapter that I have written so far

    Cheerio !!!

       


    COMEX(Commodity and metal exchange) offers gold, silver, copper and aluminum contracts as well as FTSE Eurotop 100 and 300 stock indices.

     

    [ii] High frequency trades (HFT) are done by computing an allogrintem into a computer program that will trade silver contracts in nano seconds. This can also be done by posting factious offerings to scare away would be buyers causing the security to drop in value quickly. Then in a nano second it will buy back  the security. The difference in sale price and buy price is the profit. Using a million dollars on margin;  fractional change in price can be a tidy sum. It is estimated that 80 to 90% of all trades are  now HFT’s.

  • It Can Happen to Me. Guess what? It Will ! Chapter 17 Breaking Up the Banks

    It Can Happen to Me. Guess what? It Will ! Chapter 17 Breaking Up the Banks

    IT CAN NOT HAPPEN TO ME. GUESS WHAT? IT WILL !!
    Chapter 17   Breaking Up the Banks.

    “A GREEDY MAN BRINGS TROUBLE TO HIS FAMILY, BUT HE WHO HATES BRIBES WILL LIVE.” PROVERBS 15:27       When an industry is at the top or number one it has no place to go but down. This has been my observation for over 55 years. In the US Army it is called OJT (On the Job Training).  WE as citizens going into our local bank should be warned   WATCH OUT- THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FREE LUNCH.

    Albert Einstein said man’s greatest invention is compound interest. Banks love it when they can put it to  use to an unsuspecting public.  Any funds one gets to work down the principal will find that it has expanded.  At some point one will not be able to pay that principal or off.

    A funny thing happen on the way to the bank. They did it to themselves. Easy credit will kill the goose every time. You see in order to gain more wealth , banks had to issue more debt in order to lend more.  GREED – it is a killer. Once one starts making and spending money; one needs more. It is at the very top that one takes chances in order to gain more. Usually these chances are at the detriment of us the average citizen trying to provide for a family.

    The names of Corzine, LIBOR, JP Morgan-Chase; Dimon and Weill mean little to the average citizen-until  they want to pay off debt. This is when the “Rule of 72” comes into play. It is very simple. Just divide the interest rate you are paying into 72.  Your answer is how many years the bank is doubling its money on you. So if you are paying an 8% mortgage for 30 years divided by 72 is every 9 years. To me that seems fair because you are using the banks money.  Credit cards can work on a monthly basis and now one is “going where no man has gone before”-STAR TREK. Once a debt is in outer space it is up to the courts (and the courts have to follow the law) the debtor is a pawn to spineless attorneys who seek a quick reward for returning a pittance to the lender. This is legal larceny and a USURY law supported by all nations would halt this practice and create more jobs and distribute more wealth over a wider area.

    Once a bank has you in their indebtedness you lose your freedom. The more debt you take on; the deeper the hole you are in. If you are a lawmaker, one should open their safe deposit boxes. IN the days of yesteryear, politicians would accept tax free municipal bonds, but today they have to be registered. Now one finds cash that has been unreported?

    So Nothing big can happen until elections are held, because it is more likely that the legislators involved with any kind of finances are on the take. So our votes are very important. We must elect enough new members that a group can control any committee. This has to be done in a bipartisan spirit.

    So to break up the banks in a meaningful term we must have a majority turnover in world wide elections.  WE must enforce a strong Usury Law for the protection of us all.

    When JP Morgan has outrageous short positions in Gold and Silver futures on the COMEX and the CFTC is powerless to enforce them against this giant bank. The CFTC entire budget is around $200-$300 million while JP Morgan could spend $5 billion defending their illegal position. When a giant bank can out maneuver their government of laws – the bank should be broken up rather quickly.

    My next chapters will have to do with the brokerage and financial management part of the break up.

  • UK : Pc charged with keeping a brothel

    UK : Pc charged with keeping a brothel

    UKNews060820121247538 11

    A police officer has been charged with keeping a brothel, misconduct in a public office and a drugs offence, his employers said.

    Northumbria Police Constable Philip Tate, 37, faces nine charges and has appeared before Newcastle Crown Court after being charged on May 28.

    He faces five counts of misconduct in a public office, one of supplying a class C drug, one of money laundering, one of keeping a brothel and one offence under the Consumer Credit Act, a force spokeswoman said.

    “As the case is currently going through the courts, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time,” she said.

    At a preliminary hearing held previously, Tate and two co-accused were granted bail.

    The Pc, currently suspended, will appear before the same court in October for a plea and case management hearing.

     

     

     

     

     

    Press Association

  • Coca-Cola CEO ‘who is of a Turkish origin’: ‘The Olympics needs sponsors to flourish’

    Coca-Cola CEO ‘who is of a Turkish origin’: ‘The Olympics needs sponsors to flourish’

    Muhtar kentIn a rare interview, Muhtar Kent, Coca-Cola chief executive, explains why the Games’ backers deserve credit and outlines his company’s future plans.

    As far as Muhtar Kent is concerned, understand the new Coca-Cola vending machine, Freestyle, and you understand the business. The machine is so important to Coke it has copyrighted the name.

    The Freestyle machine, designed by Pininfarina, sells up to 100 different Coke products using pharmaceutical micro-dosing technology. It is in widespread use in America and is being tested in the UK. It is much greener than its predecessor, the old vending machine that used heavy bags of syrup base and provided consumers with a choice of eight. Its development is Coke’s story in a microcosm.

    That story is about choice, choice, and more choice. Followed by innovation. And then some more choice tacked on at the end – normal, low calorie, no calorie, ready made, syrup, coffee, tea, juice, energy drinks, water.

    Coke used to make one drink. It now has 500 brands and 3,000 products. It makes drinks you can have in the early morning, the late morning, for elevenses, over lunch, after lunch, in the afternoon, in the early evening, in the late evening.

    Markets have been segmented and re-segmented, layer upon layer of different offers to different consumer groups, from New York to Chongqing, Bristol to Durban, Rio de Janeiro to Hyderabad. Coca-Cola is available in more than 200 countries throughout the world. The United Nations has 192 members.

    Turn up in almost any corner of the world and rest assured you will not be very far from a guy with a trolley selling Coke. Virgin tried, and failed, to break into the cola market in the 1990s, blown out of the water by Coke which launched aggressive advertising campaigns and brand pushes against the young upstart.

    Sir Richard Branson said the lesson he learnt was: “I’ll never again make the mistake of thinking that all large, dominant companies are sleepy.”

    As arch-rival PepsiCo struggles to retain market share and Reutersdescribes its share price as “languishing”, Coca-Cola seemingly goes from strength to strength.

    Last month, it revealed higher-than-expected second-quarter profits as strong emerging-market sales offset European decline. If you are not expanding, Kent says, you don’t have much of a business. He calls it “cracking the calculus for growth”.

    “We have made sure that we have not wasted this crisis,” says Kent, who has been Coke’s chairman and chief executive since April 2009.

    “Back in 2009 we developed a zero-waste programme – cut out all duplications, cut out all unnecessary expenses and re-allocate those funds to continue to invest in our brands through the crisis.

    “Not save our way to prosperity – which you can’t – but invest our way to prosperity. We have increased our investments counter-intuitively at a time when normal logic would say cut. That has worked for us.

    “This is a crisis unlike some in the past. It is not going to go away quickly, unemployment is not going to come down quickly, volatility and uncertainty in the macro-sense is here to stay for a while, I think at least for the next three years. One will not be able to say we are out of the crisis – it may even take longer.”

    Kent is in the UK for the Olympics, with Coca-Cola taking over the Langham Hotel in central London for the duration of the Games. The company has been sponsoring the Olympics since 1928 and is the longest continuous commercial partner of the Games. It also sponsors the Olympic Torch, the Paralympics and the Special Olympics, of which is was a founding partner.

    Kent doesn’t really do negative, he is American after all. But a sense of irritation does infuse his words as he tackles head-on the main criticisms of the Olympic sponsors – makers of sugary drinks shouldn’t have such a high profile at the world’s biggest sporting event and corporate control means that the Olympic spirit is lost under a welter of lawyers’ letters on whether a baker can make a cake with the Olympic rings on it or someone can bring a can of Pepsi into the Olympic Park.

    Kent says the criticisms miss the point. If it wasn’t for the major sponsors putting tens of millions of pounds into the Olympics every year (Coke refuses to say how much) the Games would not exist in their present form. He also points out that Coke has moved a long way from the days when it made one drink called Coke and sold it around the world.

    “Take a country like Britain,” Kent says. “Twenty years ago, everything sold under the Coca-Cola trade mark would be with full calories. Today, 20 years later, 40pc sold under the Coca-Cola trade mark are with no calories.

    “I would say [to the critics] ‘show me another category of branded food or branded fast-moving consumer goods that have been able to innovate to the level where 40pc and going up are calorie free’.”

    Kent argues that Coke has a series of major health campaigns including Street Games which involves 100,000 young people in Britain. People have a choice about what they drink and even a choice about how much they exercise.

    “You have to raise awareness,” Kent says simply. “There is a need for energy balance, so people spend more energy, spend more calories. One of the biggest issues in society is that society moves less.”

    On sponsorship, Coke argues that the company must have some protection of its intellectual property. It supports smaller businesses in other ways, often through the supply chain.

    Its main adverts during the past week have focused on employment in the UK, saying that 97.5pc of Coke products sold in Britain are made in the country in factories stretching from Sidcup in Kent to East Kilbride in Scotland.

    Coke employs 4,700 people in the UK, with a multiplier effect adding another 40,000 to that in associated supplier roles.

    “I think there is a fine balance,” Kent says on the protection of rights. “But at the same time, it is wrong to say you should provide total freedom and not have any IP control and not have any protection of our intellectual rights. There is a fine line between protecting the small guys and giving them opportunities and protecting intellectual property rights and brands.

    “In today’s world, many countries may not be able to put teams together [if there wasn’t the level of sponsorship presently available].

    “A big portion of all the funds generated through partners like Coca-Cola and others are channelled through the International Olympic Committee back to the countries, which helps the Olympic movement and national Olympic committees.

    “You can’t just say, ‘I’ll take all the benefit and I’m always going to be critical’. There has to be a balanced approach.”

    Francois Hollande, the French president, poked his baguette into the debate when he said that the hundreds of seats left empty at various venues were because the London organisers had given away too many tickets to sponsors, a mistake he said the French would never make. “The problem is that there are simply too many corporate seats,” he argued.

    Kent, speaking before Hollande’s interjection, would beg to differ. “We have a very, very high usage of tickets allocated to us so I’m not sure if there are empty seats where that is emanating from. Is it price, is it the local spectators?”.

    Most reports have said the empty seats have appeared because national Olympic federations have not used up their allocations.

    And far from giving all its seats to men in suits (Kent points out he hasn’t worn a tie all week), Coke insists that much of the allocation has gone to customers, “future flames” – Cokes partnership with young people at a community level – and partners such as suppliers.

    Kent admits it is a changing world and that for consumer-focused companies there has to be a visible commitment to issues such as sustainability that motivate consumers and particularly the young.

    Speaking at a conference earlier this year, Joe Tripodi, Coke’s executive vice president and head of global marketing, argued that the company and its investors have to become used to talking about a different kind of EPS – not earnings per share, but a partnership bringing together the economics of the business, the partnerships in the supply chain and the social value of the business.

    “If you’re not doing all three, it’s no longer optimal, it’s no longer acceptable, even, to just build value for yourself and not build value for broader society,” Tripodi said.

    Critics may dismiss such ideas as so many warm words, but Kent argues that in today’s global and inter-connected worlds, companies that do not play by the new rule book will soon be found out. He talks about “expressions of support” rather than simple sales.

    “Because of social media and the strength of social media, it is no longer important to just create positive news and tell people that,” Kent says.

    “People like to talk about something once they believe in it. That is why sustainability is so important. Consumers no longer vote for a product or buy a product because it tastes good. That is not enough any more. They want to essentially believe in the character of the company. They want to associate themselves with the character of the company. That is why sustainability is no longer a corporate social responsibility report.

    “Our Facebook page, which is the largest Facebook page in the world for any brand, is not managed by us, it is managed by two people who created it.

    “You have to have a lot of courage to let that happen as not everything that is said on that page is positive. But it would never have been the biggest Facebook page in the world if we managed it. We know that.”

    Kent is aware that after the financial crash of 2007 and 2008, public suspicion of business and even the functioning of capitalism itself has raised a number of difficult issues for corporates.

    In the UK, if not in America, the very concept of profit and levels of remuneration are regularly questioned. Frank Luntz, the Republican polling expert, has spoken of an increasing suspicion of “elites”, whether in politics or business.

    “I think there has never been a time in the world where people on the street – it doesn’t matter whether you are in San Francisco or New York or London or Lyon – have had this low level of trust in institutions, including business, government, civil society organisations, NGOs, education, health. The level of trust is really bad. That is why the ‘golden triangle’ is so important,” says Kent.

    “The future world of successful governments, successful businesses and successful NGOs and civil society organisations lies in their ability to be able to increase effective collaboration between government, business and civil society.

    “Each of us have a role to play here. Societal problems that face us, take obesity, are not going to be solved only by government, not going to be solved only by businesses, only by NGOs. It is going to take a major collaborative effort to increase awareness.”

    Coke has its own “Big Hairy Audacious Goal”, as defined by Tripodi – to double the size of its business in a decade. The company’s 2020 Vision mapped out 2pc to 4pc growth in volume of products sold, 6pc to 8pc growth in operating income and “high single-digit” earnings growth.

    Surely, in a world struggling to find growth momentum, those are pretty punchy figures?

    “[This is the] fastest-growing FMCG [fast moving consumer goods] sector in the world,” Kent says.

    “Non-alcoholic ready-to-drink beverages are growing at a clip of 4pc to 5pc. We are in a growth industry. No matter how bad the macro-economics are, in the world today versus 10 years from now, there is going to be another 800m or so people coming in to the middle class. Where are these people going to come from?

    “Obviously from Africa, Latin America and Asia – the bulk of them. Then another 700m to 800m people are going to move from rural areas to urban areas and migration will continue.

    “So, that’s almost a billion, urbanised middle class coming into the world that doesn’t exist today – that generates a tremendous demand. We feel we are the best poised to capture that growth.

    “In the last three years, we’ve captured 40pc of the growth – much larger than our fair share. And we feel we can continue to do that. That’s what gives us confidence.”

    He says that Coke is in “bolt-on” mode and is interested in targets similar to the recent $980m (£632m) acquisition of the Middle East drinks company Aujan.

    Coke already has a majority stake in the British fruit-smoothie maker Innocent, and that could grow. “We have the evolving right that continues into the future that we would own more than now,” Kent says when asked if Coke wants to wholly own the company.

    “Currently we own the majority and we manage it jointly with the founders. We have a great position and it is doing very well and nothing will change [for the company] if we own more than the current amount of the shares. We are in a good place that everyone is very happy with.”

    There have also been reports that Coke is looking at a major sponsorship deal with Formula One, rumours that Kent does not deny or confirm.

    “We have wonderful events that we are long time supporters of, such as the Olympics, Fifa World Cup and many other programmes like NASCAR and tennis in the United States,” he says.

    “So, there have always been rumours [about F1] and they’ll stay rumours.”

    Kent is American and a chief executive, so confidence is built into his DNA. He says this will be the greenest Games ever for Coke, with every bottle produced recycled and back on the streets within six weeks, the fastest ever turnaround.

    He says the company will continue to pump its millions of dollars into the Games and is already looking ahead to Rio de Janeiro in 2016. On the corporate front, many believe that Coke will continue to stick it to PepsiCo.

    “There is a tendency at times to get a lot of unfair criticism,” he says of the view held by some that “big business” must in some way always be bad.

    “Sometimes we don’t get all the credit. But I do believe that we have an inherent belief that you should ‘do’ first before you talk. And eventually people will understand.”

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Telegraph

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Telegraph