Category: EU Members

European Council decided to open accession negotiations with Turkey on 17 Dec. 2004

  • Nicolas Sarkozy orders new Armenian genocide law

    Nicolas Sarkozy orders new Armenian genocide law

    President Nicolas Sarkozy has ordered his government to draft a new law punishing denial of the Armenian genocide after France’s top court struck it down as unconstitutional.

    nic 2152591b

    France election 2012: Nicolas Sarkozy’s EU fiscal pact referendum copout

    Mr Sarkozy was accused of pandering to an estimated 400,000 voters of Armenian origin ahead of an April-May presidential election Photo: REUTERS

    9:49PM GMT 28 Feb 2012

    Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their forebears were killed in a 1915-16 genocide by Turkey’s former Ottoman Empire. Turkey says 500,000 died and ascribes the toll to fighting and starvation during World War I.

    France had already recognised the killings as a genocide, but the new law sought to go further by punishing anyone who denies this with up to a year in jail and a fine of 45,000 euros (£38,000).

    However, the Constitutional Council labelled the law an “unconstitutional attack on freedom of expression” and it said it wished “not to enter into the realm of responsibility that belongs to historians”.

    Turkey quickly welcomed the ruling on the law which Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has denounced as “tantamount to discrimination and racism”.

    Bulent Arinc, Turkey’s deputy prime minister, said on Twitter the ruling “has averted a potentially serious crisis in Turkish-French ties”.

    The decision “does not indulge political concerns,” Arinc said after Mr Sarkozy was accused of pandering to an estimated 400,000 voters of Armenian origin ahead of an April-May presidential election.

    The top court “gave a lesson in law to the French politicians who signed the bill, which was an example of absurdity,” said Arinc.

    Turkey’s EU Affairs Minister Egemen Bagis said France had averted a “historical mistake”, and Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu called the decision “an important step that will legally avert future exploitations”.

    However, Mr Sarkozy’s office quickly put out a statement saying the president “has ordered the government to prepare a new draft, taking into account the Constitutional Council’s decision.”

    Mr Sarkozy noted “the great disappointment and profound sadness of all those who welcomed with hope and gratitude the adoption of this law aimed at providing protection against revisionism.”

    After winning passage in the National Assembly and Senate, the law was put on hold in January after groups of senators and MPs opposed to the legislation demanded that its constitutionality be examined.

    The groups gathered more than the minimum 60 signatures required to ask the council to test the law’s constitutionality.

    At least two ministers, Foreign Minister Alain Juppe and Agriculture Minister Bruno Le Maire, had spoken out against the bill.

    Ankara has already halted political and military co-operation with France and had threatened to cut off economic and cultural ties.

    Trade between the two states was worth 12 billion euros ($15.5 billion) in 2010, and several hundred French businesses operate in Turkey.

    Valerie Boyer, the MP from Mr Sarkozy’s party who proposed the bill, said she was “sad but determined” following the council’s ruling, noting that under French law it was a punishable crime to deny the Holocaust.

    “Today under French law there are two types of victims and two types of descendants of victims … Some are protected from revisionist acts and some are not, and I think this is a serious double standard,” Boyer said.

    Source: AFP

    via Nicolas Sarkozy orders new Armenian genocide law – Telegraph.

  • Ankara remains isolated despite French no to genocide bill

    Ankara remains isolated despite French no to genocide bill

    By Carsten Hoffmann Feb 29, 2012, 16:53 GMT

    Istanbul – The Turkish government has hailed the French Constitutional Council’s striking down of a draft law that would have criminalized the denial of an Armenian genocide by the Ottoman Turks.

    However, the joy in Ankara may be short-lived as discussions are certain to continue, not least because Turkey’s strategy for dealing with the massacres of Armenians does not appear to be paying off, and is increasingly isolating the country.

    Apart from France, there have also been disputes over the issue with the United States, Canada and Switzerland.

    The US ambassador in Ankara, Francis Ricciardone, believes Turkey has to tackle the ghosts of its past.

    ‘We believe that historians have to address this issue openly and honestly in order to reach a genuine acknowledgement of what happened,’ he said.

    Friends and critics alike have called on the Turkish government to show some movement on the issue before 2015, the centenary of the events, in order to prevent the possibility of a more serious conflict developing.

    In the past, Turkey has resorted to diplomatic notes expressing strong protest, angry threats and the withdrawal of ambassadors in its battle against claims that genocide took place in the Ottoman Empire.

    While Turkey does not deny the suffering of the Armenians during the First World War, it objects to what it considers to be a one-sided presentation of the deaths of the hundreds of thousands of Armenian that began in 1915 as a genocide.

    Turkey’s NATO partners have long remained silent on the issue, even though many of them have detailed reports from their own diplomats at the time, who wrote about deportations and death marches.

    However, Ankara has consistently argued that what it often refers to ‘the tragic events of 1915’ resulted from Turkey’s need to defend itself because the Armenians had allied themselves with the Russians and were planning a revolt.

    ‘Turkey does not deny the suffering of the Armenians, including the loss of many innocent lives, during the First World War. However, a greater number of Turks died or were killed in the years leading to and during the War,’ the Foreign Ministry wrote in a press release.

    ‘Parliaments and other political institutions should not legislate history when historians are debating the substance of the issue,’ it added.

    Turkey has denied the substance of much of the genocide claims. In 2005 then Foreign Minister and current President Abdullah Gul said Turkey faced an extremely well organized campaign of genocide allegations.

    ‘This organized campaign is based on prejudices, slander, lies, exaggerations and fabrications concerning our nation and our country, which began to be disseminated nearly one century ago,’ he said.

    At the time Henry Morgenthau, who was US ambassador to the Ottoman Empire in 1913-1916, wrote in his memoirs that he was ‘confident that the whole history of the human race contains no such horrible episode’ as the Armenian genocide.

    Gul argues that Morgenthau was relying on information provided by Armenian extremists.

    In 2008, Turkish intellectuals called in an open letter for forgiveness for the crimes perpetrated against the Armenian people but drew short of describing the events as ‘genocide’.

    Renowned Turkish journalist Mehmet Ali Birand has warned his country against falling into what he describes as a ‘genocide trap’.

    ‘The current situation has only arisen because we always just said no,’ he wrote.

    via Ankara remains isolated despite French no to genocide bill – Monsters and Critics.

  • Merkel apologizes for the neo-Nazi killings

    Merkel apologizes for the neo-Nazi killings

    merkel8Chancellor Angela Merkel has apologized publicly to the relatives of 10 people, mostly immigrants, suspected of being killed by a neo-Nazi group whose actions Germanauthorities failed to detect for more than a decade.

    The group is suspected of killing eight people of Turkish origin and a Greek man between 2000 and 2006. Those killings went unsolved for years. The group is also believed to have killed a policewoman in 2007.

    Merkel told a memorial today the killings were “a disgrace for our country.” She says some victims’ relatives were unjustly suspected in the murders, telling them: “I ask for forgiveness.” The neo-Nazi activities came to light in November when two suspected founders were found dead and a third suspected member turned herself in.

     

     

     

     

    Hürriyet daily news

  • EU and Turkey: talks languish, trade booms

    EU and Turkey: talks languish, trade booms

    (AP)  ISTANBUL — If a project has no deadline, is it really a project? What do you call a negotiation process in which the partners can’t talk about key issues? These are existential times for Turkey’s campaign to join the European Union — an ambitious vision that has become increasingly ambiguous.

    TurkeyEU

    (File/Associated Press) – FILE – In this Sept. 30, 2011 file photo, two landmarks, Sultan Ahmed Mosque, left, and Hagia Sophia, seen with the Bosporus, in Istanbul, Turkey. If a project has no deadline, is it really a project? What do you call a negotiation process in which the partners can’t talk about key issues? These are existential times for Turkey’s bid to join the European Union, an ambitious vision that has become increasingly ambiguous

    At a time when Greece’s survival in the eurozone is in jeopardy, it seems academic to debate a Turkish entry to European ranks that some Turks feel won’t happen in their lifetime, if at all. The more pressing question is whether the suitors should, as with any soured romance, call it quits or rekindle the flame.

    When accession talks began in 2005, the idea was that Turkey’s Muslim population would enrich the continent, culturally and economically, with Turkey itself destined to become a European-style democracy that could serve as an east-west bridge.

    More than six years later, doubt haunts hope.

    Economic troubles mean that Europe, where skepticism toward the Turkish bid was already building, has little energy to expand, while in Turkey reform efforts have slowed and the nation has sought to carve out a leadership role in the Middle East.

    “Without a deadline, without a final aim, there is no process,” said Cengiz Aktar, a political science professor at Bahcesehir University in Istanbul. “There can’t be an endless project.”

    Aktar, who attended the opening of an EU information office at the university on Friday, said it was “high time” for a reassessment of Turkey’s bid. He rejected the argument that EU-backed reform alone was enough, as though the journey was as good as the destination.

    The debate is in limbo partly because France and Germany, which have spoken against full Turkish membership, hold elections this year and 2013 respectively, and no bold initiatives are expected during the political campaign season.

    Even if those European heavyweights choose governments that are more sympathetic to Turkey’s candidacy, there is no sign of progress on a long-running dispute over EU member Cyprus, where the Greek-speaking south observes European rules and Turkey aids and occupies the isolated Turkish Cypriot north.

    Jean-Maurice Ripert, the EU’s new ambassador to Turkey, said more joint teams would be formed to lay technical groundwork for accession in case political conditions improve in the years ahead. He cited 40,000 student exchanges between Turkey and the EU last year, as well as EU plans to spend 800 million euros ($1.06 billion) this year on European development projects in Turkey.

    “Don’t think that nothing is happening,” he said in a meeting with foreign journalists. Since his January arrival, Ripert said, Turkish officials have assured him of their commitment to joining the European Union and voiced frustration with what they see as European opposition.

    In the past decade, Turkey has evolved into a regional powerhouse whose foreign policy remains in step with, but no longer defined by, its allies in NATO. Europe, meanwhile, was signaling fatigue with the idea of expansion well before it sank into recession.

    “In Brussels nowadays, you hear very little talk of enlargement,” said Sinan Ulgen, chairman of EDAM, a research center in Istanbul, and a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe in the Belgian capital. “The main issue is essentially the economic crisis.”

    Numbers tell the story of the failure and potential of the Turkish bid, a legacy of Ottoman sultans who sought to upgrade their crumbling empire with European ideas, as well as Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the national founder who looked westward for inspiration.

    Half of the three-dozen subjects, or chapters, in membership negotiations are blocked. No new chapter has been opened since June 2010. However, Europe accounts for nearly half of Turkey’s foreign trade, as well as about 85 percent of foreign direct investment there.

    Turkey once highly anticipated the EU’s annual report on its membership progress. Interest has dwindled. European officials have expressed concern about minority rights, the right to a fair trial and freedom of expression, and Turkey has slammed Greek Cypriot vetoes of negotiations and a French bill that would criminalize denial that the mass killings of Armenians by Ottoman Turks was a genocide.

    “The Europe that is afraid of speaking and arguing has nothing to give humanity,” Turkey’s Anadolu agency quoted Egeman Bagis, minister for EU affairs, as saying. “But the EU that we always emphasize being the most comprehensive peace project in the history of humanity has to be more courageous and liberal.”

    Andrew Gardner, an Amnesty International researcher, said EU-inspired legislative reform in Turkey had resulted in fewer reported cases of torture in police stations and prisons, but warned of a “regression of the human rights situation” in Turkey, particularly with regard to free expression. He also cited the negative impact of statements by EU leaders suggesting Turkey might not be accepted as a full member even if it fulfills human rights obligations.

    Suat Kiniklioglu, a former ruling party lawmaker and director of the Ankara-based Center for Strategic Communication, captured the ambiguity that shrouds Turkey’s EU campaign by offering two ways to look at it.

    The first: “The process is going nowhere and neither side is willing to admit it. This is heading toward a slow death.”

    The second, which he prefers: “The current impasse is actually not that bad as Europe needs time to sort out its own problems while Turkey will continue to grow and reform domestically at its own pace. The negotiations can be revived any time the two sides feel they are ready.”

    Ulgen, the visiting scholar in Brussels, said a “vicious circle” had developed, in which Turkey, once praised for its reform program, loses enthusiasm for a process that it believes is unfair, while Europe loses leverage over a process that some of its leaders treat with ambivalence.

    “We’re in standstill mode,” he said. According to Ulgen, Turkey and the European Union must eventually decide what kind of a relationship they want because: “We cannot continue to pretend anymore that the negotiations are continuing.”

  • FORMER WORLD BANKER WOLFENSOHN MAKES STUNNING CONFESSION

    FORMER WORLD BANKER WOLFENSOHN MAKES STUNNING CONFESSION

    WOLFENSOHNTHE VIDEO EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE, BUT FOR DIFFERENT REASONS… THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD BANK, JAMES WOLFENSOHN, MAKES STUNNING CONFESSIONS AS HE ADDRESSES GRADUATE STUDENTS AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY. HE REVEALS THE INSIDE HAND OF WORLD DOMINATION FROM PAST, TO THE PRESENT AND INTO THE FUTURE. THE SPEECH WAS MAS MADE JANUARY 11TH, 2010. THE NEXT 19 MINUTES MAY OPEN YOUR MIND TO A VERY DELIBERATE WORLD.

    HE TELLS THE GRAD STUDENTS WHAT’S COMING, A “TECTONIC SHIFT” IN WEALTH FROM THE WEST TO THE EAST. BUT HE DOESN’T TELL THE STUDENTS THAT IT IS HIS INSTITUTION, THE WORLD BANK, THAT’S DIRECTING AND CHANNELING THESE CHANGES.

    WOLFENSOHN’S OWN INVESTMENT FIRM IS IN CHINA, POISED TO PROFIT FROM THIS “IMMINENT SHIFT” IN GLOBAL WEALTH.

  • Berlinale Crowns Crystal Bear Winners: Turkey’s “Lal Gece” & New Zealand’s “Meathead”

    Berlinale Crowns Crystal Bear Winners: Turkey’s “Lal Gece” & New Zealand’s “Meathead”

    The Berlinale’s winners of the Crystal Bears from the Generation 14plus (youth) jury are Reis Çelik’s “Lal Gece” from Turkey as Best Feature Film and Special Mention for Ella Lemhagen’s “Kronjuvelerna” from Sweden.

    lalgeceBest Short Film is Sam Holst’s “Meathead” from New Zealand and the Special Mention short film is Isamu Hirabayashi’s “663114” from Japan.

    Details on the films and reasons for their selection are below. Awards will be given to winners tonight, along with a screening of “Lal Gece” at Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Cinema 1, at 7:30pm CET.

    Crystal Bear for the Best Feature Film: “Lal Gece”

    by Reis Çelik, Turkey 2011

    We were deeply touched by he brilliant actors in this year’s winning film. They let us take part in the feelings of two people who are imprisoned by family traditions which do not leave them any space for their own decision making and needs. We were especially impressed by the film’s setting – a room where the drama unfolds. Just as for the couple, it is impossible for the audience to leave it.

    Special Mention Feature Film: “Kronjuvelerna”

    by Ella Lemhagen, Sweden 2011

    Friendship, love, family, the divide between poor and rich, disabilities and sickness were only a few of the Themes flowing effortlessly into one another in this complex and many-layered Film.

    The fairytale style does not in any way detract from the dramatic sequence of events. The great acting brought forth the entire Spectrum of Emotions, from which the Audience had no escape. This film touched us deeply. A real Masterpiece!

    Crystal Bear for the Best Short Film: “Meathead”

    by Sam Holst, New Zealand 2011

    The film shows us, just in a few minutes, the radical path from childhood to adulthood. Using authentic images the film portrays the rituals of a closed communities which you cannot escape from. The film exemplifies peer pressure and social pressure which can be found in all societies. For us, it has all the qualities necessary for a great short film.

    Special Mention Short Film: “663114”

    by Isamu Hirabayashi, Japan 2011

    Visuals and Sound melded together flawlessly to create a philosophical and layered masterpiece. The director conveys his message, beyond all conventions. Through a simple metaphor he portrays the survival of a culture, even in the face of catastrophe.

    The members of the Youth Jury in the Generation 14plus:

    Klara Kruse Rosset

    Gülcan Çil

    Solveig Lethen

    Jarnail Fang Yu Singh Sekhon

    Sami Yacob

    Nico Palesch

    Lino Steinwärder

    via Berlinale Crowns Crystal Bear Winners: Turkey’s “Lal Gece” & New Zealand’s “Meathead” | Filmmakers, Film Industry, Film Festivals, Awards & Movie Reviews | Indiewire.