Category: EU Members

European Council decided to open accession negotiations with Turkey on 17 Dec. 2004

  • Fule urges Turkey to implement Additional Protocol

    Fule urges Turkey to implement Additional Protocol

    FAMAGUSTA GAZETTE • Wednesday, 27 February, 2013

    2-27-2013-4-56-52-AM-2021844

    Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy Stefan Fule said that Turkey must urgently comply with its obligation to fully implement the additional protocol and to make progress in normalizing its bilateral relations with the Republic of Cyprus.

    Fule made the remark in a reply to Cypriot MEP Antigoni Papadopoulou who submitted a written question to the European Commission, urging it to take a more decisive stance toward Turkey to immediately implement the Ankara Protocol and stop the Turkish side acting provocatively towards the Republic of Cyprus.

    In his reply, Fule refers to the European Commission’s conclusions, which said that Turkey’s compliance with its European obligations would give a new push to the accession procedure.

    He said that if no progress is achieved in implementing its commitments, then according to the Commission, there could not be conditions to lift the measures taken in 2006.

    Fule refers to the Council’s conclusions of 10th December 2012, adding that it is sad that Turkey did not make any progress towards normalizing its relations with the Republic of Cyprus.

    Accession negotiations with Turkey began in October 2005. Turkey has so far managed to open 13 of the 34 chapters. Only one chapter has opened and closed, the chapter on science.

    In December 2006, due to the Turkish failure to apply the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement, the European Council decided that eight relevant chapters will not be opened and no chapter will be provisionally closed until Turkey has fulfilled its commitment.

    The eight chapters are: Free Movement of Goods, Right of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services, Financial Services, Agriculture and Rural Development, Fisheries, Transport Policy, Customs Union and External Relations.

    In addition, France has frozen other five chapters, while Cyprus froze in December 2009 other six chapters. The last time that a negotiating chapter opened was during the Spanish EU presidency in June 2010.

    Three more chapters could open but the Commission believes they are too difficult for the current stage of negotiations, while Turkey believes that the cost of opening them is not affordable for now. Turkey, whose troops occupy Cyprus` northern part since 1974 does not recognise the Republic of Cyprus and refuses to normalize relations with Nicosia.  — Copyright © Famagusta Gazette 2012 All comments are now moderated

    via Fule urges Turkey to implement Additional Protocol.

  • Merkel’s Visit to Turkey Marks a Positive Change of Mind

    Merkel’s Visit to Turkey Marks a Positive Change of Mind

    As the eurozone crisis shows signs of further deepening with the new uncertainties in the wake of Italian ‘non-elections’, Germany is increasingly under strain to keep the European Union intact.

    Berlin has to deal not only with the brewing anti-austerity and anti-unionism in the Mediterranean strip of the EU (all the way from Cyprus through Portugal, except, perhaps, France), but also with an uneasy Britain and loudly impatient Turkey on the continent’s both flanks.

    In that context, German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s visit to Turkey must be added as another positive step toward melting the icy relationship between Ankara and the EU.

    It follows two other important recent steps. First, France unblocked a chapter (of five) of Ankara’s negotiations with Brussels, coming during its current peace talks with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), and secondly, Greek Cypriots overwhelmingly (57.5 percent) voted for the Democratic Rally (DISY) leader, Nicos Anastasiades in the presidential election, a strong signal of a mood change on the island.

    Merkel’s visit was long overdue. It has been well-noted that she has visited Turkey only once in three years, while Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has visited Germany four times.

    Should it be interpreted as the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) now being in accord with its coalition partner, the Free Democratic Party (FDP), about the strategic importance, economic performance and crucial democratic transformation of Turkey? Perhaps. Does this mean that the German chancellor comes closer to CDU heavyweights who have been vocally pro-Turkish membership, such as Ruprecht Polenz, Chariman of the Bundestag’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, and gets ready to be challenged by others within?

    Could be. Deep down she knows that she has the backing of those CDU strong figures, on central and local level, although a few, about remaining committed to coalition protocol on Turkey’s accession and support for it to continue. But a slight challenge nevertheless.

    No matter what,one can hope that the visit and the positive sound of her messages indicate a long-lasting change of mind.

    Cynics in Turkey and Germany think they have seen “no progress” between Erdoğan and Merkel on Turkey’s EU accession process. Populist Bild Zeitung, in another outburst of sensationalist Turkophobia, totally insensitive to Turkey’s internationally important democratization process as ever, declared that ‘Turkey would never be a full member of the EU’ — despite its powerful economy. (This view reveals more about some parts of the Europe than Turkey itself).

    Bild is joined in Turkey by voices that have been anti-reform, anti-AKP and anti-Europe.

    The truth, and the good news, is, Merkel not only endorsed France’s unblocking move, but also signaled that other chapters may follow, with perhaps a second one even before the end of the Irish term presidency in the EU. One understands that she needs to balance very carefully in an election year for Germany on a subject which can shake and stir the votes.

    There are many aspects to why Germany should be more active, frank and clear about its relations with Turkey and its policy on the EU negotiations. Pro-EU arguments based on today’s Turkish economy speak for themselves, as outlined by Kemal Derviş, the vice president of the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., and a former minister of economic affairs of Turkey, for the daily Handelsblatt on Feb. 25, 2013 in an article titled “Die Politik ist am Zug” (“The policy is on track”).

    Apart from fine figures on inflation, growth, reduced deficit, employment, strong currency and reserves, German politicians do look with admiration at “hardworking” Turks (a virtue they value highly), when they compare them with the Mediterranean citizens of the EU.

    Turkey with such an economy is now too big for Germany to ignore, and far too important to be seen only as a simple trading partner, no doubt. Therefore, the tough visa regulations and the particularly rigid implementation of it attributed to German general councils in Turkey must be eased — liberalized in the sense that, once having passed a security check, Turkish citizens must be given five-year, multiple-entry Schengen visas.

    Nor should there be any doubt that increasing defense cooperation through NATO on Syria creates a new momentum for Berlin to realize more deeply Turkey’s significance on the southeastern flank of the continent, as it shoulders increasing burdens. Stability in Turkey, in that sense, can be said to be serving the stability of Germany, and of Europe as a whole.

    Merkel did not say much on Turkey’s Kurdish peace process, but given the presence of large, politicized Turkish communities; Alevi and Kurdish diasporas in her own country — take it for granted that solutions on all social rifts here will ease tensions there. Interests overlap.

    And in that case, it is demanded that Germany more thoroughly consider indirect, discreet assistance to endorse Turkey in its struggle against historical demons. The EU membership process, kept alive and well, is the best help.

    What Bild Zeitung and other populist tabloids do miss is that, what still matters most for Turkey’s reformist camp is the perspective of, and not necessarily, membership.

    Given the current turmoil and identity crisis the EU is in, it can be said that there will have to be referendums on Turkish membership — in Europe and Turkey – between now and the final decision. The process is still premature: It needs a decade or more. So, no need for myopia.

    Merkel is certainly right in her arguments about Cyprus (that Turkey opens its sea and airports to its flights and vessels), even if it is an issue that still needs time, given the stalemate. Before that, both sides on the island must show a concrete, willful progress on reaching a settlement.

    It has become also clear that Erdoğan is willing to resolve the issue in a broader context.

    He expects a complementary signal from Anastasiades, and has in mind a “package solution” that should involve Cypriots as well as Greece, energy, security and economic cooperation in Eastern Mediterranean, with the backing of Britain and the U.S.

    Germany can play a crucial role, in both EU and NATO context, if Erdoğan’s ideas make any sense.

  • Germany Shuts Down Reactors, Turkey Builds, Why?

    Germany Shuts Down Reactors, Turkey Builds, Why?

    NİLAY VARDAR REPORTED FROM GERMANY

    Germany Shuts Down Reactors, Turkey Builds, Why?

    While Turkey is eagerly signing deals to establish its first nuclear power plant in a foreseeable future without discussing potential perils of nuclear energy, Germany has been dealing with nuclear waste for the past 35 years.

    Nilay VARDAR
    nilay@bianet.org

    490-254

    * At a salt mine 930 meters below ground

    Following the disaster in Fukushima, Germany has decided to shut down all its nuclear reactors by 2022. The decision also re-ignited the nuclear waste storage issue that troubled the country for 35 years.

    Located two hours away from Berlin, the district of Gorleben has become a major destination in Germany anti-nuclear lobby, especially when truck loads of nuclear waste are being transferred to a storage facility at a nearby salt mine underground.

    Along with a dozen journalists from Turkey, I was invited by Henrich Böll Stiftung Foundation to visit nuclear waste storage facilities in Gorleben, Germany.

    No consensus on ultimate storage facilities

    One of the most controversial aspects of nuclear energy is its waste storage. No country, so far, has resolved this issue. Scientists have yet to reach an agreement on whether it is safer to store nuclear waste in ultimate storage facilities underground or just on more ordinary storage facilities on the ground. In 2005, Germany banned the re-usage of nuclear waste in various side industries, saying that it might fall into the hands of terrorists who might potentially use it as a weapon.

    Turkey never discussed nuclear waste

    No nuclear waste management plan has been announced by Turkish government yet. There are rumors that Russia might purchase nuclear waste produced from Turkey’s first reactor in Akkuyu, Mersin province.

    Upon their activation, nuclear reactors start producing nuclear waste. Initially, this waste is contaminated in barrels and transferred to an intermediate storage facility where it is kept for 40 years. Nonetheless, some waste material doesn’t lose radioactivity for 250,000 years and there are endless debates on how to store or restore them.

    More than 35 years to complete facility

    * Ultimate nuclear waste storage facility located 3 kilometers away from a river

    Pioneers in nuclear waste storage research, Finland and Sweden are making plans to store their nuclear waste in granite rocks, while Germany decided to do the same in salt mines. The decision on the storage material depends on the distribution of geological resources. Establishing its first nuclear power plant in 1968, Germany has chosen the salt mines located in Gorloben as its major nuclear waste storage area. However, the decision has been out off for 10 years due to political reasons, and now an implementation is on the way to resolve the political disagreement. Because the inhabitants of Gorloben has never been persuaded on the security of nuclear waste storage facility with a solid scientific evidence.

    Waste to be store in salt

    A delegation of 9 journalists from Turkey have been 930 meters below ground to see the salt mines in Gorloben. Germany spend over 1,6 million euros to establish the facility and there is still the risk that it cant be activated due to pressure from local lobbies.

    The facility experts claim that salt mineral doesn’t contaminate gases for at least 250 million years. In this way, they hope to store the waste in salt crystals.

    There is no “0 risks”

    There is no “0 risks”, experts said. “The whole point is to store the waste as secure as possible.” The German government is looking for ways to reach the waste 500 years later in case new technologies will make it possible to re-use or recycle the nuclear material. However, nobody can estimate from now what earth will look like in 500 years.

    At the intermediate storage level

    After visiting the ultimate waste storage area below ground, we went to the intermediate storage level which costs 50 million euros to Germany and two thirds of it full already. The facility will leave its post to the ultimate storage facility once the project is complete.

    Jürgen Auer, PR representative of the facility, said the barrels did not contaminate any radiation at all, but it risked becoming a target of terrorist attacks. “The ultimate storage facilities are cost-efficient and we are insisting to build them because of moral responsibility,” he said.

    Salt mine security issues

    Lately, there has been a flooding accident in another salt mine in Asse, Germany. Even though Germany insists that below ground facilities are the safest way to store nuclear waste, the incident proved once more of potential risks. Now nobody knows how water will evacuated from the storage facility. The situation of stored nuclear waste is also unknown.

    Farmers of Gorloben

    Following our facility visits, we went to downtown Gorloben where people seemed not happy at all to have a nuclear storage facility right outside their city.

    “We chose a yellow cross (which looks like the letter x) sign to represent the arrival of trainloads of nuclear waste, because we don’t know when they are coming,” a farmer said.

    These yellow cross signs are ubiquitous around the city. Some farmers attempt to block the railway with their vehicles. Others even pave the railway with yellow pyramid-shaped bricks and out their hand in them. Farmers claimed that they have been assaulted by police forces to stop their protests. During the latest protest, the farmers blocked the railway for 15 hours.

    Farmer struggle resumes

    Monica Tietke, an organic farmer, said her family was in the business for 450 years.

    “We don’t know how this facility will affect our farms here. There is no guarantee that it won’t affect the environment and people surrounding the area,” she said.

    Tietke said Gorlebon farmers has been struggling to stop the facility construction for the past 35 years.

    “There are controversies surrounding the facility. We had pine forests in the forests and many believe that a recent arson was caused by the facility construction. It might be a sabotage even.”

    Gorleben farmers also said they have taken legal action to stop the facility from activating in the near future. “We want a reassessment of environmental costs. Until then, we will continue blocking the railways.” (NV/BM)

  • Is Turkey’s EU Membership Inching Closer?

    Is Turkey’s EU Membership Inching Closer?

    Is Turkey’s EU Membership Inching Closer?

    eu-flagFor decades now, Americans have been telling the EU that if it wants the world to take it seriously, it needs to admit Turkey as a member. Turkey’s strong military forces, its growing economy and its key position in the Middle East would add considerable weight to Europe’s global position and deliver a boost to the struggling European economy.

    The Europeans may be finally warming to this suggestion—the Germans and the French in particular. The NYT reports:

    Ms. Merkel’s government and the Christian Democrats have for years called on the bloc to allow Turkey to achieve what they call a “privileged partnership,” instead of full membership. But important party members have begun to indicate their apprehensions toward Ankara may be changing.

    France has also resisted the idea of Turkey’s full accession and, with Cyprus and the European Commission, has blocked movement on all but 13 of the 35 policy areas, called chapters, that countries striving for membership must complete. Turkey has so far completed only one.

    But President François Hollande of France signaled last week that he was ready to open talks on one chapter blocked under the government of his predecessor, Nicolas Sarkozy.

    There’s still a long road ahead. Fears of mass migrations of poor, Muslim Turks are still there. Historical enmities and rivalries have led Greece and Cyprus to use every trick in the book to delay and obstruct Turkish membership. And France hates the thought of admitting another powerful, populous country: Paris’ influence in Europe would inevitably be diluted if Turkey joins.

    There are also problems of human rights. Turkey’s war with the Kurds and its record of abuses under both the Kemalist governments and the current Islamist one give many Europeans pause.

    For their part, many Turks have written the EU off as too unwelcoming, too anti-Islamic, and now too economically sluggish.

    Is this dynamic about to change? It’s certainly something to keep an eye on.

    – See more at:

  • Merkel: Cyprus still a stumbling block for Turkey

    Merkel: Cyprus still a stumbling block for Turkey

    GERMAN Chancellor Angela Merkel said yesterday she was in favour of reviving Turkey’s stalled talks on its relationship with the European Union but Cyprus remained a stumbling block.

    Speaking during a two-day visit to Turkey, Merkel, who favours a “privileged partnership” for Turkey in place of full membership, said it would be right to open a new chapter in Ankara’s negotiations with Brussels.

    But she said failure to agree on the Ankara Protocol, which would extend Turkey’s customs agreement with the EU by opening its ports to goods from Cyprus, was hindering Turkey’s membership ambitions. “I said today that we should open a new chapter in the negotiations,” Merkel told a news conference in Ankara.

    “I must say however, that so long as the question of the Ankara protocol, which hangs closely together with Cyprus, is not solved, we will have problems in opening as many chapters as would be perhaps good and proper,” she said.

    “We can sign the Ankara Protocol only if the visa dialogue process with the EU is signed at the same time,” Erdogan said at a joint press conference, underlining a long-standing demand that Turkish citizens be allowed visa-free travel in Europe.

  • Germany revises position on Turkey’s EU bid to boost economic cooperation

    Germany revises position on Turkey’s EU bid to boost economic cooperation

    ANKARA, Feb. 26 (Xinhua) — German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s two-day visit to Turkey has demonstrated that Germany is ready to accentuate its support to Turkey’s accession talks with the European Union (EU) despite lingering concerns for the eventual membership prospects.

    Merkel’s cautious remarks while she was in Turkey signaled that Germany is ready to toe in the new line adopted by French President Francois Hollande, who agreed to lift the French veto on the opening of talks on one of the five chapters blocked by Paris.

    “The French offering of olive branch as part of the goodwill gesture towards Turkey by Hollande seems to have forced Germany to decide to downplay its opposition to Turkey’s full membership,” Mehmet Seyfettin Erol of the Ankara-based Gazi University told Xinhua.

    “It looks like both France and Germany is vying for an influence in Ankara using the EU talks as leverage,” he added.

    Merkel, a conservative Christian Democrat leader, personally opposed to Turkish membership and has always advocated a watered- down link with Ankara called “privileged partnership.”

    In Ankara on Monday, Merkel reiterated her skepticism, but said that “I fully support that the negotiations take place openly.”

    “The change of heart in Berlin and France has to do with the economic benefits Turkey can bring to these countries that are already under heavy pressure due to lingering Eurozone woes,” Idris Gursoy, a Turkish analyst, told Xinhua.

    “Germany is Turkey’s number one trading partner and as such Merkel’s visit was aimed to compartmentalize issues with Turkey with a view that political differences remain separated from economic cooperation,” he explained.

    Merkel was accompanied by a delegation of German businessmen during her trip to Turkey and she attended the Turkish-German CEO Forum, jointly organized by the Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen Association (TUSIAD) and the German Industrialists Federation (BDI).

    Turkey’s growing clout in the region, both economically and politically, may have given a boost to Turkish membership bid. Most EU member states support Turkish membership while the other few, led by Germany and France, are finding it increasingly difficult to make their case for the opposition to Turkey.

    The 27-member bloc’s highest decision-making body, the EU Council, in December reiterated the bloc’s commitment to active accession negotiations with Turkey, while calling for a new momentum in these negotiations. This was interpreted as an indication that France and Germany increasingly find themselves isolated in the bloc in their opposition to Turkish membership.

    EU Energy Commissioner Gunther Oettinger’s prediction that Germany and France would beg Turkey to join the EU within the next decade has started huge controversy in the bloc last week. Interestingly, Oettinger is a member of Merkel’s conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU).

    Turkey opened accession talks with the EU in 2005, but has only been able to finish talks on one of the 35 chapters that a candidate country has to complete before joining the bloc. No chapter has been opened for talks for the past two and a half years.

    Nicole Pope, another analyst based in Istanbul, said she believes that Merkel gave tentative support to Turkey’s EU accession process and shied away from full endorsement because of upcoming German elections.

    “With elections coming up later this year, the German chancellor is unlikely to be vocal in her support of Turkey’s membership bid,” she noted.

    Merkel’s visits to the German military troops deployed to man two German-supplied Patriot missile batteries near the Turkey- Syria border and to the ancient churches in the region of Cappadocia were seen as efforts to score political points back at home.

    Merkel said her government wanted religious foundations to operate freely in Turkey and in every country in the world.

    “This is a clever move by a conservative leader to gain some backing ahead of elections,” Erol underlined.

    Germany is also under pressure from Turkey on the lack of cooperation on terrorism. Ankara claims that German authorities are not doing enough to tackle fund-raising activities of the terrorist organizations that target Turkey and its citizens.

    Editor: Zhu Ningzhu

    via Germany revises position on Turkey’s EU bid to boost economic cooperation – Xinhua | English.news.cn.