Category: EU Members

European Council decided to open accession negotiations with Turkey on 17 Dec. 2004

  • ERDOGAN AND BERLUSCONI WORK TOGETHER TO DEEPEN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP

    ERDOGAN AND BERLUSCONI WORK TOGETHER TO DEEPEN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP

    ERDOGAN AND BERLUSCONI WORK TOGETHER TO DEEPEN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP

    By Saban Kardas

    Friday, November 14, 2008

    Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan hosted his Italian counterpart, Silvio Berlusconi, in the Aegean city of Izmir on November 12. The visit cemented the personal relations between the two leaders and provided a platform for discussing projects to expand bilateral political, economic, and cultural cooperation.  

    Following the model of high-level meetings Italy holds with major European countries, Erdogan and Berlusconi also co-chaired an intergovernmental summit bringing together ministers from the two sides. The gathering brought together ministers of foreign affairs, defense, transport, economy, energy, and the interior from both sides, who discussed, in addition to bilateral relations, joint strategic projects in the Mediterranean, the Balkans, the Caucasus, and the Middle East.

    A statement from the Italian Embassy in Ankara emphasized that by initiating this process with Turkey, Italy made it clear that it considered relations with Turkey as “strategic” (Anatolian Agency, November 11). Similarly, a press brief from the office of the Turkish prime minister emphasized the strategic aspect of the relationship and added that such meetings would be held annually (www.cnnturk.com, November 11).

    The current state of Turkish-European relations was the major item on the agenda. The Justice and Development Party (AKP) government has not achieved any major progress toward EU membership since beginning the process in 2005. What led to the current stalemate in the accession process has been a matter of contention. The AKP government has come under criticism from pro-reform circles as well as EU institutions for slowing down the membership process, while Erdogan has repeatedly put the blame on the EU’s attitude toward Turkey (EDM, November 6).

    Maintaining Italy’s traditional pro-Turkey position, Berlusconi repeated his unconditional support for Erdogan and Turkey during the summit, saying that they had overcome many difficulties “shoulder to shoulder” (www.haberturk.com, November 13). Berlusconi noted that although some EU countries continued to oppose Turkey’s membership, he would continue to emphasize Turkey’s strategic importance and convince the EU that it needed to admit Turkey as a member. Berlusconi criticized the slow pace of Turkey-EU accession negotiations. He called on the upcoming Czech and Swedish presidencies of the EU to accelerate the process and open four negotiating chapters in one year. These remarks definitely pleased Erdogan (Anadolu Ajansi, November 12).

    In an interview with the Turkish daily Hurriyet, Erdogan noted that “Italy is Turkey’s greatest advocate in the EU.” Berlusconi further dismissed the claim that secularism was under threat in Turkey, and he argued that Erdogan had been a great reformer. (Hurriyet, November 12). These emotional remarks were no surprise, given the close friendship that has been cultivated between Erdogan and Berlusconi over the last six years.

    It remains to be seen, however, to what extent Italy can use “Turkey’s strategic importance” to exert leverage on its European partners and deliver on those promises. For Berlusconi, Turkey’s progress on political reforms was satisfactory (Hurriyet, November 12). Only the previous week, however, the European Commission’s progress report criticized Turkey in many areas (EDM, November 6). Chairman of the Turkey-EU Joint Parliamentary Committee Joost Lagendijk said that Turkey’s strategic importance was no guarantee for membership and placing too much emphasis on this thesis undermined domestic reform processes (Anatolian Agency, November 6).

    Nor is it clear whether Berlusconi commands support at home for his Turkish policy. When the news about Berlusconi’s warm remarks on Turkey arrived at a session of the Italian Parliament, representatives from his coalition partner, Lega Nord, were reportedly outraged. They repeated their party’s opposition to Turkey’s membership on geographical, cultural, and religious grounds, and underlined that admitting Turkey would be a grave strategic mistake and undermine European unity (www.tgrthaber.com, Dogan Haber Ajansi, November 13).

    Italy, nonetheless, prefers to approach Turkey from a strategic perspective. In that context, Berlusconi constantly refers to the strategic role Turkey plays as a bridge between European markets and hydrocarbon reserves, a factor that led Italy to invest in pipelines passing through Turkey (Hurriyet, November 13).

    Berlusconi also detailed Italy’s position on expanding membership of the G-8 forum of industrialized countries. He emphasized the need to bring in more countries to make it an inclusive organization, moving first to G-14 and then to G-20. Given Turkey’s constructive role in international diplomacy, Berlusconi vowed to seek ways to include Turkey in the activities of the G-8, when Italy assumes the presidency of the organization next year (www.cnnturk.com, November 12). Both leaders are scheduled to attend the G-20 Summit in Washington, D.C., on November 15 (Today’s Zaman, November 14).

    During the press briefing following their summit, Erdogan and Berlusconi stressed determination to work together for a more peaceful world. Erdogan highlighted the destruction that miscalculated American policies had brought onto the region, particularly to the Iraqi people. He remarked, “If we really want global peace, all world leaders have to work in solidarity…and the G-20 has an important role to play.” In response to a question about whether the two countries would provide additional troops to expand the international mission in Afghanistan, they both declined to rule out the possibility and said that the new U.S. administration would have to clarify its position first and they will be ready to discuss the issue in NATO (ANKA, November 12).

    The joint declaration released after the summit reiterated Italy’s support for Turkey’s EU process and emphasized two countries’ willingness to expand cooperation in other areas. The declaration also noted that the foreign ministers had signed an agreement for the establishment of an Italian university in Istanbul (www.bbm.gov.tr, November 12).

     

  • Baron David de Rothschild: Economic Crisis Will Bring New World Order, Global Governance

    Baron David de Rothschild: Economic Crisis Will Bring New World Order, Global Governance

    The first barons of banking

    Last Updated: November 06. 2008 7:11PM UAE / November 6. 2008 3:11PM GMT

    Nobleman: Baron David de Rothschild, the head of the Rothschild bank. The Rothschilds have helped the British government since financing Wellington

    Among the captains of industry, spin doctors and financial advisers accompanying British prime minister Gordon Brown on his fund-raising visit to the Gulf this week, one name was surprisingly absent. This may have had something to do with the fact that the tour kicked off in Saudi Arabia. But by the time the group reached Qatar, Baron David de Rothschild was there, too, and he was also in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.

    Although his office denies that he was part of the official party, it is probably no coincidence that he happened to be in the same part of the world at the right time. That is how the Rothschilds have worked for centuries: quietly, without fuss, behind the scenes.

    “We have had 250 years or so of family involvement in the finance business,” says Baron Rothschild. “We provide advice on both sides of the balance sheet, and we do it globally.”

    The Rothschilds have been helping the British government – and many others – out of a financial hole ever since they financed Wellington’s army and thus victory against the French at Waterloo in 1815. According to a long-standing legend, the Rothschild family owed the first millions of their fortune to Nathan Rothschild’s successful speculation about the effect of the outcome of the battle on the price of British bonds. By the 19th century, they ran a financial institution with the power and influence of a combined Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and perhaps even Goldman Sachs and the Bank of China today.

    In the 1820s, the Rothschilds supplied enough money to the Bank of England to avert a liquidity crisis. There is not one institution that can save the system in the same way today; not even the US Federal Reserve. However, even though the Rothschilds may have lost some of that power – just as other financial institutions on that list have been emasculated in the last few months – the Rothschild dynasty has lost none of its lustre or influence. So it was no surprise to meet Baron Rothschild at the Dubai International Financial Centre. Rothschild’s opened in Dubai in 2006 with ambitious plans to build an advisory business to complement its European operations. What took so long?

    The answer, as many things connected with Rothschilds, has a lot to do with history. When Baron Rothschild began his career, he joined his father’s firm in Paris. In 1982 President Francois Mitterrand nationalised all the banks, leaving him without a bank. With just US$1 million (Dh3.67m) in capital, and five employees, he built up the business, before merging the French operations with the rest of the family’s business in the 1990s.

    Gradually the firm has started expanding throughout the world, including the Gulf. “There is no debate that Rothschild is a Jewish family, but we are proud to be in this region. However, it takes time to develop a global footprint,” he says.

    An urbane man in his mid-60s, he says there is no single reason why the Rothschilds have been able to keep their financial business together, but offers a couple of suggestions for their longevity. “For a family business to survive, every generation needs a leader,” he says. “Then somebody has to keep the peace. Building a global firm before globalisation meant a mindset of sharing risk and responsibility. If you look at the DNA of our family, that is perhaps an element that runs through our history. Finally, don’t be complacent about giving the family jobs.”

    He stresses that the Rothschild ascent has not been linear – at times, as he did in Paris, they have had to rebuild. While he was restarting their business in France, his cousin Sir Evelyn was building a British franchise. When Sir Evelyn retired, the decision was taken to merge the businesses. They are now strong in Europe, Asia especially China, India, as well as Brazil. They also get involved in bankruptcy restructurings in the US, a franchise that will no doubt see a lot more activity in the months ahead.

    Does he expect governments to play a larger role in financial markets in future? “There is a huge difference in the Soviet-style mentality that occurred in Paris in 1982, and the extraordinary achievements that politicians, led by Gordon Brown and Nicolas Sarkozy, have made to save the global banking system from systemic collapse,” he says. “They moved to protect the world from billions of unemployment. In five to 10 years those banking stakes will be sold – and sold at a profit.”

    Baron Rothschild shares most people’s view that there is a new world order. In his opinion, banks will deleverage and there will be a new form of global governance. “But you have to be careful of caricatures: we don’t want to go from ultra liberalism to protectionism.”

    So how did the Rothschilds manage to emerge relatively unscathed from the financial meltdown? “You could say that we may have more insights than others, or you may look at the structure of our business,” he says. “As a family business, we want to limit risk. There is a natural pride in being a trusted adviser.”

    It is that role as trusted adviser to both governments and companies that Rothschilds is hoping to build on in the region. “In today’s world we have a strong offering of debt and equity,” he says. “They are two arms of the same body looking for money.”

    The firm has entrusted the growth of its financing advisory business in the Middle East to Paul Reynolds, a veteran of many complex corporate finance deals. “Our principal business franchise is large and mid-size companies,” says Mr Reynolds. “I have already been working in this region for two years and we offer a pretty unique proposition.

    “We work in a purely advisory capacity. We don’t lend or underwrite, because that creates conflicts. We are sensitive to banking relationships. But we look to ensure financial flexibility for our clients.”

    He was unwilling to discuss specific deals or clients, but says that he offers them “trusted, impartial financing advice any time day or night”. Baron Rothschilds tends to do more deals than their competitors, mainly because they are prepared to take on smaller mandates. “It’s not transactions were are interested in, it’s relationships. We are looking for good businesses and good people,” says Mr Reynolds. “Our ambition is for every company here to have a debt adviser.”

    Baron Rothschild is reluctant to comment on his nephew Nat Rothschild’s public outburst against George Osborne, the British shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer. Nat Rothschild castigated Mr Osborne for revealing certain confidences gleaned during a holiday in the summer in Corfu.

    In what the British press are calling “Yachtgate”, the tale involved Russia’s richest man, Oleg Deripaska, Lord Mandelson, a controversial British politician who has just returned to government, Mr Osborne and a Rothschild. Classic tabloid fodder, but one senses that Baron Rothschild frowns on such publicity. “If you are an adviser, that imposes a certain style and culture,” he says. “You should never forget that clients want to hear more about themselves than their bankers. It demands an element of being sober.”

    Even when not at work, Baron Rothschild’s tastes are sober. He lives between Paris and London, is a keen family man – he has one son who is joining the business next September and three daughters – an enthusiastic golfer, and enjoys the “odd concert”. He is also involved in various charity activities, including funding research into brain disease and bone marrow disorders.

    It is part of Rothschild lore that its founder sent his sons throughout Europe to set up their own interlinked offices. So where would Baron Rothschild send his children today?

    “I would send one to Asia, one to Europe and one to the United States,” he said. “And if I had more children, I would send one to the UAE.”

    rwright@thenational.ae

    Source: www.thenational.ae, November 06. 2008

  • Is Turkey’s EU membership dream vanishing?

    Is Turkey’s EU membership dream vanishing?

    By Ibon Villelabeitia – Analysis

    ANKARA (Reuters) – Turkey risks seeing its dream of European Union membership vanish unless it urgently pushes reforms, but to rebuild trust between the two sides EU members must send a clear message that Ankara’s bid is not doomed.

    An EU enlargement progress report last week said Turkey had a long way to go, while Croatia, which began accession talks at the same time as Ankara, was at the doors of entering the bloc.

    The report, which raps Turkey for slow progress on issues ranging from human rights to intellectual property protection to curbing the power of the military, has raised fresh doubts over whether this large and predominantly Muslim country of 70 million will ever become a full EU member.

    “The million dollar question is whether Turkey will ever join the European Union,” said Amanda Akcakoca, an analyst at the European Policy Center in Brussels.

    “Trust is starting to ebb away between the EU and Turkey. Turkey has a lot of homework to do but it is important for the EU to send a symbolic message to Turkey,” Akcakoca said.

    Turkey began accession negotiations in 2005, but the pace of reforms has since slowed and talks are moving at snail’s pace.

    Analysts say political distractions at home and little appetite for enlargement among EU member states after the bloc’s costly expansion into central and eastern Europe have pushed the EU agenda to the backburner of Turkey’s ruling AK Party.

    “We have reached a stalemate and it is difficult to see how Turkey and the EU will get out of it and gain momentum,” said Wolfango Piccoli, an analyst for Eurasia Group.

    “The longer it takes the tougher it will be for Turkey to enter the EU. There is a danger that slow progress will fuel a growing estrangement which will be difficult to repair.”

    Turkey has always had a rocky relationship with the EU, clashing frequently over free speech, minority rights and the divided island of Cyprus.

    HUMAN RIGHTS

    Turkey had won praise for its efforts to stamp out police mistreatment in the past, but a rise in complaints of torture mentioned in the report has prompted fears that progress on key reforms may be stalling.

    “There is a danger that in this stalemate we might see some progress slipping back,” said Ozgur Unluhisarcikli, director of the Ankara office of the German Marshall Fund think-tank.

    “It could start at low level and the government could say: ‘Ok, mistreatment of prisoners and torture is getting bad, but we have more pressing issues now’,” he said.

    The EU wants Turkey to make progress on judicial reform, minority rights and to open its ports to traffic from Cyprus.

    The ruling AK Party, which secured Turkey’s decades-long quest to officially launch EU membership negotiations, has repeatedly pledged to revive its EU drive.

    But few observers have any faith Turkey’s bid will regain momentum in the near future, with municipal elections in March and a slowing economy dominating the government’s agenda.

    “We risk being in 2009 with nothing on the menu,” a European Commission source, who declined to be named, said.

    This stand-still would come from a combination of lack of reforms in Turkey and the opposition of some EU states’ to Turkey’s full membership. France, Cyprus and Germany are all blocking one or several areas — so-called chapters of talks.

    Analysts have said it will be decades, rather than years, before Turkey joins the EU.

    Turkish officials complain of double standards, and have cited the example of Croatia, a Roman Catholic country of 4.4 million which has leapfrogged Turkey on the EU path.

    At stake are broader security and energy repercussions for both Europe and Turkey, analysts say.

    Turkey, a NATO member, is a key transit route of Central Asian gas for the West. Europe needs a stable Turkey and the EU membership is an anchor for financial and political stability.

    (Additional reporting by Ingrid Melander in Brussels)

  • EU calls for ‘new deal for new world’ with Obama

    EU calls for ‘new deal for new world’ with Obama

    BRUSSELS: The head of the European Union (EU)’s executive body, the European Commission, congratulated Barack Obama on his victory in the US presidential election and called on him to work with the EU to shape a “new deal for a new world”.

    “This is a time for a renewed commitment between Europe and the US. I want to assure president elect Obama of the support of the European Commission and of my personal support in forging this renewed commitment to face together the many challenges ahead of us,” European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said.

    We need a new deal for a new world. I sincerely hope that with the leadership of President Obama, the US will join forces with Europe to drive this new deal – for the benefit of our societies, for the benefit of the world,” he said in a statement.

    Ahead of Tuesday’s election, politicians across Europe had expressed the hope that the successor to US President George W Bush – whether Obama or his rival, John McCain – would abandon Bush’s unilateral stance in favour of more cooperation with the EU.

    The European Union seems to be in an extraordinary rush for a one world government, commonly reffered to as the New World Order. //11.08.08

    Source: macedoniaonline.eu, 08.11.2008

  • Here comes One World Government Right on cue

    Here comes One World Government Right on cue

    UK’s Brown: Now is the time to build global society

    By Online Sunday, November 9, 2008

    LONDON (Reuters) – The international financial crisis has given world leaders a unique opportunity to create a truly global society, Britain’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown will say in a keynote foreign policy speech on Monday.

    In his annual speech at the Lord Mayor’s Banquet, Brown—who has spearheaded calls for the reform of international financial institutions—will say Britain, the United States and Europe are key to forging a new world order.

    “The alliance between Britain and the U.S.—and more broadly between Europe and the U.S.—can and must provide leadership, not in order to make the rules ourselves, but to lead the global effort to build a stronger and more just international order,” an excerpt from the speech says.

    Brown and other leaders meet in Washington next weekend to discuss longer term solutions for dealing with economic issues following a series of coordinated moves on interest rates and to recapitalize banks in the wake of the financial crisis.

    “Uniquely in this global age, it is now in our power to come together so that 2008 is remembered not just for the failure of a financial crash that engulfed the world but for the resilience and optimism with which we faced the storm, endured it and prevailed,” Brown will say in his speech on Monday evening.

    “…And if we learn from our experience of turning unity of purpose into unity of action, we can together seize this moment of change in our world to create a truly global society.”

    According to a summary of the speech released by his office, Brown will set out five great challenges the world faces.

    These are: terrorism and extremism and the need to reassert faith in democracy; the global economy; climate change; conflict and mechanisms for rebuilding states after conflict; and meeting goals on tackling poverty and disease.

    Brown will also identify five stages for tackling the economy, starting with recapitalizing banks so they can resume lending to families and businesses, and better international co-ordination of fiscal and monetary policy.

    He also wants immediate action to stop the spread of the financial crisis to middle-income countries, with a new facility for the International Monetary Fund, and agreement on a global trade deal, as well as reform of the global financial system.

    “My message is that we must be: internationalist not protectionist; interventionist not neutral; progressive not reactive; and forward looking not frozen by events. We can seize the moment and in doing so build a truly global society.”

    (Reporting by Jodie Ginsberg; Editing by Janet Lawrence)

    Source: canadafreepress.com, November 9, 2008

  • Headed toward one world government

    Headed toward one world government

    Just where are we now? Let’s see. The government has caused the largest financial failure in our country’s history and they blame Wall Street and you and me.

    Oh yes, Wall Street is a major player, but the government overseers were asleep at the switch – Barney Frank, Dodd, Bush, the Senate and the Congress. Politicians all. It is a case where the rich got extremely wealthy and you and I got extremely poorer.

    Where do we go from here? Our government is now the country’s largest bank owner in the world, and that is comforting – not. Bigger government means bigger problems. One candidate wants to tax us more. I think I heard him say something about a “trillion” dollars. Throwing more money at the fire only makes the fire get hotter and harder to control.

    We have seen global responses to this financial situation for the first time in world history. Cutting interest rates in Europe, Japan, China and around the world because of the failure of the system here at home.

    Next step, a one world monetary system, which, by the way, is in place to happen. In Europe it is called the euro. Here in North America it is called the Amero. In other parts of the world they have similar names. However, it will be controlled by a one-world bank. All that was needed was the vehicle to allow this to happen. And it is here.

    When can you expect this one world monetary system? Within the next 18 months. You will hear more about it as they get further into the recovery proposals.

    The funny thing is there is nothing you or I can do to stop this change in our lives. Electing politicians doesn’t help after all they are a major part of the new order. One World Government.

    William Swearingen

    Elgin

    Source: www.dailyherald.com, 03.11.2008