Category: EU Members

European Council decided to open accession negotiations with Turkey on 17 Dec. 2004

  • Turkey to select next-generation helicopter

    Turkey to select next-generation helicopter

    Monday, October 26, 2009

    ÜMİT ENGİNSOY

    ANKARA – Hürriyet Daily News

    A15Turkey is preparing to select a new utility helicopter model, which it plans to produce and use for both military and civilian purposes over the next 20 years.

    Turkey’s procurement office is presently holding talks with a U.S. company and a European consortium. One of them will lead the work with local partners to jointly produce hundreds of utility platforms worth billions of dollars.

    The two firms are the U.S. Sikorsky Aircraft and the Italian-British AgustaWestland. Sikorsky is competing with its S-70 Black Hawk International and AgustaWestland is offering a platform currently being developed for the Turkish contract.

    The two companies presented their best offers in September, and Turkey’s Defense Industry Executive Committee is expected to choose a winner before the year-end, senior procurement officials told the Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review.

    The members of the Defense Industry Executive Committee, Turkey’s top decision-making body on procurement matters, include Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ, Defense Minister Vecdi Gönül and Chief Procurement Officer Murad Bayar.

    The first batch of utility helicopters to be jointly produced will comprise 109 platforms, worth more than $1 billion.

    Some 40 of those platforms will go for civilian purposes, and the rest will be military helicopters for the Army, the Navy, the Air Force and the Gendarmerie.

    20 helicopters a year

    “After the first batch of 109 helicopters, we expect to order nearly 20 helicopters a year from this assembly line for many years,” one procurement official said.

    “So the model we choose will be Turkey’s standard utility helicopter model for the next 20 years,” said the official. Turkey also plans to export this jointly manufactured utility platform.

    Presently, the Turkish military is operating several different types of helicopters. The military has more than 100 S-70s, more than 100 older U.S.-made UH-1 Hueys and 19 French-designed AS-532 Cougars.

    Separately, the procurement office is holding government-to-government talks with the United States for the purchase of 10 CH-47 Chinook heavy-lift helicopters, made by Boeing. In the long run, Turkey wants to design, develop and manufacture its own light utility helicopter.

    Hürriyet Daily News

  • ‘Iran is our friend,’ says Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan

    ‘Iran is our friend,’ says Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan

    • We have no difficulty with Ahmadinejad – Erdogan
    • Warning to Europe not to ignore Turkey’s strengths

    A13With its stunning vistas and former Ottoman palaces, the banks of the Bosphorus – the strategic waterway that cuts Istanbul in half and divides Europe from Asia – may be the perfect place to distinguish friend from foe and establish where your country’s interests lie.

    And sitting in his grandiose headquarters beside the strait, long the symbol of Turkey‘s supposed role as bridge between east and west, Recep Tayyip Erdogan had little doubt about who was a friend and who wasn’t.

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran‘s radical president whose fiery rhetoric has made him a bête noire of the west? “There is no doubt he is our friend,” said Erdogan, Turkey’s prime minister for the last six years. “As a friend so far we have very good relations and have had no difficulty at all.”

    What about Nicolas Sarkozy, president of France, who has led European opposition to Turkey’s bid to join the EU and, coincidentally, adopted a belligerent tone towards Iran’s nuclear programme? Not a friend?

    “Among leaders in Europe there are those who have prejudices against Turkey, like France and Germany. Previously under Mr Chirac, we had excellent relations [with France] and he was very positive towards Turkey. But during the time of Mr Sarkozy, this is not the case. It is an unfair attitude. The European Union is violating its own rules.

    “Being in the European Union we would be building bridges between the 1.5bn people of Muslim world to the non-Muslim world. They have to see this. If they ignore it, it brings weakness to the EU.”

    Friendly towards a religious theocratic Iran, covetous and increasingly resentful of a secular but maddeningly dismissive Europe: it seems the perfect summary of Turkey’s east-west dichotomy.

    Erdogan’s partiality towards Ahmadinejad may surprise some in the west who see Turkey as a western-oriented democracy firmly grounded inside Nato. It has been a member of the alliance since 1952. It will be less surprising to Erdogan’s secular domestic critics, who believe the prime minister’s heart lies in the east and have long suspected his Islamist-rooted Justice and Development party (AKP) government of plotting to transform Turkey into a religious state resembling Iran.

    Erdogan vigorously denies the latter charge, but to his critics he and Ahmadinejad are birds of a feather: devout religious conservatives from humble backgrounds who court popular support by talking the language of the street. After Ahmadinejad’s disputed presidential election in June, Erdogan and his ally, the Turkish president, Abdullah Gul, were among the first foreign leaders to make congratulatory phone calls, ignoring the mass demonstrations and concerns of western leaders over the result’s legitimacy.

    Talking to the Guardian, Erdogan called the move a “necessity of bilateral relations”. “Mr Ahmadinejad was declared to be the winner, not officially, but with a large vote difference, and since he is someone we have met before, we called to congratulate him,” he said.

    “Later it was officially declared that he was elected, he got a vote of confidence and we pay special attention to something like this. It is a basic principle of our foreign policy.”

    The gesture will be remembered when Erdogan arrives in Tehran this week for talks with Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, that will focus on commercial ties, including Turkey’s need for Iranian natural gas. Ahmadinejad has voiced his admiration for Erdogan, praising Turkey’s recent decision to ban Israel from a planned Nato manoeuvre in protest at last winter’s bombardment of Gaza.

    Since the election, Iran has witnessed a fierce crackdown on opposition figures that has resulted in activists, students and journalists being imprisoned and publicly tried. Detainees have died in prison, and there have been allegations of torture and rape. Some of those alleging mistreatment have sought refuge in Turkey.

    But Erdogan said he would not raise the post-election crackdown with his hosts, saying it would represent “interference” in Iranian domestic affairs.

    He poured cold water on western accusations that Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon, saying: “Iran does not accept it is building a weapon. They are working on nuclear power for the purposes of energy only.”

    Erdogan has overseen a dramatic improvement in the previously frigid relations between Turkey and Iran, which was viewed with suspicion by the pro-secularist high command of the powerful Turkish military. Trade between the two countries last year was worth an estimated £5.5bn as Iran has developed into a major market for Turkish exports.

    Erdogan’s views will interest US foreign policy makers, who have long seen his AKP government as a model of a pro-western “moderate Islam” that could be adopted in other Muslim countries. They will also find an audience with President Barack Obama, who signalled Turkey’s strategic importance in a visit last April and has invited the prime minister to visit Washington. They are unlikely to impress Israel, which has warned that Erdogan’s criticisms risk harming Turkey’s relations with the US.

    Erdogan dismissed the notion, saying: “I don’t think there is any possibility of that. America’s policy in this region is not dictated by Israel.”

    He insisted that the Turkey-Israel strategic alliance – which some AKP insiders have said privately is over – remains alive but chided the Israeli foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, who he said had threatened to use nuclear weapons against Gaza.

    The Guardian

  • EU launches digital library at Frankfurt Book Fair

    EU launches digital library at Frankfurt Book Fair

    (FRANKFURT) – The European Union used the world’s biggest book fair to launch the EU Bookshop’s digital library, making more than 50 years of documents in about 50 languages available for free on the Internet.

    Individuals, companies and isolated libraries from Australia to Zambia can download files dating back to 1952 when six countries created what is now the 27-member EU.

    “With the digital library, we have total transparency” of EU legislative and cultural publications, Commissioner for Multilinguism Leonard Orban told AFP on Sunday.

    The project also underpins “the commitment of the European Union to preserve and encourage the history of the union in its linguistic diversity,” he added.

    The library’s oldest document is a speech by Jean Monnet to inaugurate the High Authority of the Coal and Steel Community, the EU’s precursor.

    From four official languages at its start, the union now counts 23, but some publications are also available in Chinese, Russian and around 20 other languages.

    Orban voiced hope that the digital library would be “an additional tool for combating prejudices.”

    On a practical level he added: “No one can complain now of problems consulting legislative texts and associated documents.”

    Roughly 110,000 publications or 12 million pages — the equivalent of four kilometres (2.5 miles) of bookshelves — were scanned from EU archives from February 2008 at a cost of about 2.5 million euros (3.75 million dollars).

    The library counts around 140,000 publications today, and 1,500 “born digital” ones are added each year. More pre-digital documents will also be scanned into the system.

    Topics covered by EU institutions, agencies and other bodies include education, the environment, health and transport, an EU statement released at the Frankfurt Book Fair said.

    Official statistics from 1953 to the present are also available.

    The library’s contents will also be a part of Europeana, a project of prominent national European libraries and archives that Claudia Lux, president of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions called the largest digital library worldwide.

    EU Business

  • Israel’s attacks will lead to its isolation

    Israel’s attacks will lead to its isolation

    By Gideon Levy

    A8Israel has been dealing one blow after another to the rest of the world. While China has still not recovered from Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman’s absence from the reception at its Tel Aviv embassy – a serious punishment for China’s support for the Goldstone report – France is licking its wounds after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “vetoed” a visit by the French foreign minister to Gaza. And Israel has dealt another blow: Its ambassador in Washington, Michael Oren, will boycott the conference next week of the new Israel lobby J Street.

    China, France and J Street will somehow get by despite these boycotts, Turkey will also recover from the great vacationers’ revolt, and we can expect that even the Swedes and Norwegians will recover from Israel’s loud reprimands. But a country that attacks and boycotts everyone who does not exactly agree with its official positions will become isolated, forsaken and detestable: North Korea of today or Albania of yesterday. It’s actually quite strange for Israel to use this weapon, as it is about to turn into the victim of boycotts itself.

    Israel strikes and strikes again. It strikes its enemies, and now it strikes out at its friends who dare not fall exactly in line with its official policies. The J Street case is a particularly serious example. This Jewish organization rose in America along with Barack Obama. Its members want a fair and peace-seeking Israel.

    Advertisement
     

    That’s their sin, and their punishment is a boycott.

    Oren, meanwhile, is a devoted representative: He also is boycotting. After criticizing Israeli columnists, including this one, in an article in The New Republic for daring to criticize Netanyahu’s speech at the UN – an outrage in its own right – the ambassador-propagandist uses the boycott weapon against a new and refreshing Jewish and Zionist organization that is trying to battle the nationalistic and heavy-handed Jewish-American establishment.

    In whose name is Oren doing that? Not in the name of Israeli society, whose ambassador he supposedly is. The former ambassadors from Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union would have acted the same way.

    Such aggressiveness is a bad sign. It will drive away our last true friends and deepen our isolation. “A nation alone” has turned into our goal, our isolation has become an aspiration. Whom will we have left after we attack and boycott everyone? Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League? Our propagandist-attorney Alan Dershowitz?

    Dividing the world up between absolute good and evil – our side and our enemies, with no middle ground – is a sign of despair and a complete loss of direction. It’s not just our ambassador in Washington, who knows nothing at all about democracy and pluralism and only wants to please his masters. Such behavior – kicking and barking crazily in every direction – is destroying Israel.

    Without giving us a chance to voice our opinion, Israel is falling to the status of an international pariah, the abomination of the nations. And whom can we thank for that? Operation Cast Lead, for example. Only the United States remains our automatic and blind ally for all our mistakes. Another democracy that saw its status deteriorating so much would ask itself first and foremost what mistakes it had made.

    In Israel our approach is exactly the opposite: The rest of the world is guilty. The Scandinavians are hostile and the Turks are enemies, the French and British hate Israel, the Chinese are only Chinese and the Indians can’t teach us anything.

    Any legitimate criticism is immediately labeled here as anti-Semitism, including Richard Goldstone, the Jewish Zionist. We are pushing everyone into a corner roughly and hope they will change their opinions and suddenly be filled with a deep understanding for the killing of children in Gaza. Now America too, even its Jews, are no longer immune to this aggressive Israel mad with grandeur.

    The damage is piling up from Beijing all the way to New York. After the J Street boycott even American Jews will know that Israel is not a tolerant, open-minded or liberal country, despite what they are being told.

    Now they will know that “the only democracy in the Middle East” is not exactly that, and whoever does not repeat and proclaim its propaganda messages will be considered an enemy – they may also be punished severely.

    They should just ask the billion Chinese who are licking their wounds from the mortal blow the Israeli Foreign Minster dealt them personally.

    Haaretz

  • New U.S. Missile-Defense Plan

    New U.S. Missile-Defense Plan

    Poland Ready To Participate In

    39E0D69C A5C3 4153 B9A0 E68CD01138FB w393 sU.S. Vice President Joe Biden talks to the press in Warsaw.
    October 21, 2009
    By Brian Whitmore
    (RFE/RL) — Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk says Warsaw is ready to take part in a new, reconfigured U.S. missile-defense system in Europe.

    Tusk made his comments after meeting U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, who is in Warsaw as he kicks off a tour of Eastern European capitals, part of an effort to reassure allies in the region that Washington’s “reset” in relations with Russia won’t come at their expense.

    “Poland sees this concept, this project, this new configuration of missile defense, as very interesting and necessary. And we are ready to take part in it to the extent that is needed,” Tusk said at a joint press conference with Biden.

    Officials in many former communist Eastern European countries are concerned their security interests will be sacrificed as U.S. President Barack Obama seeks to improve relations with Russia, which sank to a post-Cold War low under the George W. Bush administration.

    Polish and Czech officials are especially nervous about Obama’s decision in September to reconfigure U.S. missile-defense plans in Europe.

    Obama scrapped a Bush administration plan to place interceptor missiles in Poland and an advanced radar in the Czech Republic in favor of a more mobile system that will initially rely on sea-based interceptors. Moscow fiercely opposed the earlier plan.

    U.S. officials say the new plan is designed to counter a current threat from short- and intermediate-range Iranian missiles. The White House and Pentagon say Obama’s proposal is superior to the Bush plan, which was designed to defend against a long-range missile threat from Iran that does not yet exist.

    “Simply put, our missile plan is better security for NATO and is better security for Poland,” Biden said.

    Obama’s missile shield plan would initially deploy sea-based SM-3 interceptor missiles in 2011. An updated version would later be positioned at sea and land — possibly in Poland and the Czech Republic — in 2015.

    The White House says a more advanced system would be built in 2018 and 2020, with the capability to intercept long-range Iranian missiles, should that need arise.

    No ‘Reset’ For U.S. Allies

    But for many Eastern Europeans, the missile-defense plan was less about Iran and more about their own fears of Moscow.

    Czech and Polish officials in particular believed hosting components of a missile-defense system provided symbolic security against a threat from Russia, and saw Obama’s move as a dangerous capitulation to Moscow.

    Frantisek Sulc, a reporter for the Czech weekly “Tyden” and the co-author of a book on missile defense, says despite being NATO members and beneficiaries of the alliance’s Article 5 collective security guarantee, many Poles and Czechs still fear Moscow.

    “It is psychological. The Poles and the Czechs want to have bigger assurances because of the past — because of the history with the Soviet Union, because of the invasions, because of the sphere of influence. There is still a fear of Russia,” Sulc says.

    Sulc says that those in favor of deploying the radar in the Czech Republic country “usually mentioned that if the United States troops would be stationed here then we would be more secure. The physical presence, for a portion of the population of the Czech Republic, is really important.”

    In an interview before his trip with the Polish daily “Rzeczpospolita,” Biden said the United States would not sign any agreements with Moscow that harm the security of its allies in Central and Eastern Europe. The United States will decide “nothing about you without you,” Biden said.

    Biden also defended the Russia reset in general, saying, “improving the mood between the United States and Russia will contribute to improving security in Europe and will bring benefits to our allies.”

    Biden is expected to propose that Poland host SM-3 interceptors to target short- and intermediate-range Iranian missiles. Obama’s plan calls for initially deploying sea-based interceptors before later adding the land-based SM-3 missiles.

    Warsaw also wants Washington to deploy a Patriot interceptor missile battery to Poland to help upgrade the country’s air defenses. Under the Bush plan, Warsaw had secured a commitment for the temporary deployment of Patriot missiles several times a year.

    Biden’s trip marks the second time in recent months the White House has dispatched the vice president to calm jittery U.S. allies over Washington’s policy of improving ties with Moscow. Biden visited Georgia and Ukraine in July.

  • JOINING BATTLE FOR CRIMEA

    JOINING BATTLE FOR CRIMEA

    RUSSIA IS LOSING THE BATTLE OVER THE CRIMEA TO WASHINGTON AND BRUSSELS
    Author: Tatiana Ivzhenko
    [The European Union vies for clout with the Crimea.]

    Nezavisimaya Gazeta
    October 20, 2009

    The European Union joins the Russian-American backstage battle for
    the Crimea. Web site of the Ukrainian government posted a brief
    note to the effect that implementation of the EU’s Joint
    Initiative of the Commonwealth in the Crimea was going to begin
    right after election of the president. The program in question
    included investment projects in all economic and social spheres.
         Sources in the government claim that European countries’ plan
    of actions on the peninsula was already charted and that its
    endorsement was scheduled for spring 2010. Each EU participant
    will be put in charge of some particular sphere like economic
    development (Great Britain), environmental protection (Sweden),
    and civil society (the Netherlands). Finland, Germany, Hungary,
    Poland, Lithuania and, perhaps, Estonia are prepared to join the
    program too. Kiev counts on up to 12 million euros worth of
    investments in the Crimea in 2010 alone. Gunnar Wiegand who
    represents the European Commission in the project recently met
    with the government of Ukraine. He informed the Ukrainians that
    the European Union regarded the Crimea as an extremely important
    region, “one with a powerful potential for all of Europe”.
         As far as Senior Deputy Premier Alexander Turchinov was
    concerned, the new Crimean project meant rapid rapprochement with
    Europe and a wholly new level of relations with it.
         “The project is of paramount importance for the government of
    Ukraine and for Yulia Timoshenko… particularly at the onset of
    the presidential campaign,” Konstantin Bondarenko of the Gorshenin
    Institute of Management Issues confirmed. “It offers them an
    opportunity to show that the Crimea is part of Ukraine and, also
    importantly, that Ukraine is a country to invest in.” Bondarenko
    recalled that President Leonid Kuchma had approached the Russians
    with analogous ideas in 2002 – 2003 [with the idea of joint
    investments in development of the peninsula]. “Unfortunately, I
    cannot call the Russians particularly enthusiastic or energetic,”
    he said. “At the very least, I do not think much of the economic
    results of the Russians’ activeness. The impression is that they
    erroneously made an emphasis on politics but people cannot be
    expected to last long on slogans alone.”
         Vladimir Kazarin of the Sevastopol administration seconded
    this opinion. “It is clear now that Russia is losing the battle
    for influence with the Crimea. It was Russia and the United States
    vying for clout with the peninsula once, but no longer. The
    European Union is joining them too, these days, and Brussels makes
    an emphasis on investments rather than on politics.”
         Kazarin pointed out that the new player moved in just as
    Russia was losing ground. “We witness these days what would have
    been considered impossible barely a year ago,” he said. “We see
    pickets with anti-Russian slogans and posters in front of the
    Black Sea Fleet HQ. What counts is that these protest actions are
    organized by Black Sea Fleet’s ex-employees. I can only surmise
    that the Russian authorities are not informed, that they do not
    grasp long-term political consequences of the current underfunding
    of the Black Sea Fleet… when 8,000 employees including 1,000
    officers are to be laid off, when wage arrears mount along with
    debts to Sevastopol’s department of public works and to the
    pensions foundation. The situation is challenging indeed. Anyone
    capable of solving economic problems of Sevastopol and, broader,
    all of the Crimea will earn the locals’ gratitude,” Kazarin said.
         Neither did the United States withdraw from the battle for
    the peninsula. Establishment of a diplomatic mission or
    information bureau in Sevastopol was suggested this spring but
    protests from the population and the local authorities persuaded
    Washington to table the idea then. It is on the agenda again,
    these days. It is the US Consulate General that the Americans want
    to set up in the Crimea now. “The way I see it, problems were
    encountered because the Crimean authorities had deliberately gone
    too far in their efforts to make the whole matter political,”
    Vladimir Nalivaichenko of the Ukrainian Security Service said.
    “What can be so political about an American mission? We all see
    how the Russian Consulate General operates in the Crimea.
    Diplomats were the first to arrive, followed by Russian
    businesses, capitals, and so on.”
         Valery Chaly of the Razumkov Center did not think that the
    Americans could really count on unproblematic existence in the
    Crimea. The population was thoroughly suspicions of all and any
    Washington’s initiatives concerning the peninsula, he said. Not so
    the EU’s initiatives which the locals never associated with
    politics.
         Political scientists meanwhile comment that Russia does not
    even try to counter these Western moves. Crimean pro-Russian
    organizations complain of the lack of support. The Russian
    Community of the Crimea, Russian Bloc, Russian Crimea, Tavria
    Alliance, Faith, Crimean Civil Activists, and Crimean Russian
    Youth Center set up a coordinating council. This body will chart a
    common strategy and coordinate joint efforts aimed at “promotion
    of the Russians’ legitimate rights and interests.”
         One of the activists explained that interests of the Russians
    were vulnerable and needed promotion because “the Ukrainian
    authorities and their Western patrons are determined to drive the
    Black Sea Fleet out of the Crimea while everyone is distracted by
    the crisis.” The activist commented that the news of the EU’s
    initiatives was released in the midst of fresh scandals involving
    the Black Sea Fleet. Ukrainian media outlets reported movement of
    the fleet’s units and forces – allegedly to training grounds – the
    Ukrainian authorities had never been notified of in advance. Local
    nationalists appealed to the authorities to confiscate military
    hardware of the Black Sea Fleet for violation of the terms of
    presence specified by Ukrainian-Russian agreements.
         Ukrainian experts point out that Moscow deliberately refuses
    to acknowledge the latest scandals involving the fleet and the
    Ukrainian organizations that volunteer to promote interests of
    Russia. Political scientists agree that political actions are
    pointless when there is an economic crisis to grapple with.
    Economic projects, ones that offer jobs, salaries, and security
    are the only thing capable of swaying public opinion. Economic
    projects are precisely what the European Union might beat the
    United States and Russia with.