Category: Germany

With an estimated number of at least 2.1 million Turks in Germany, they form the largest ethnic minority. The vast majority are found in what used to be West Germany. Berlin, Frankfurt,Hamburg, Rhine-Ruhr (Cologne, Duisburg and Dortmund) have large Turkish communities. The state with the largest Turkish population is North Rhine-Westphalia.

  • Turkey, Germany arrest Iranians in nuclear smuggling scheme

    Turkey, Germany arrest Iranians in nuclear smuggling scheme

    Germany and Turkish security officials have caught smugglers suspected of transporting nuclear materials from India to the Iranian city of Arak, overseas media reports.

    Ynet News says the security officials conducted a simultaneous raid in Germany and in Istanbul. The raid led to several arrests: A Turkish citizen who was born in Iranian was found with documents that detailed the smuggling and was arrested in Istanbul. And another Iranian suspect was detained and arrested at Ataturk Airport. German police, meanwhile, are holding five Iranian suspects, Ynet says.

    Two other suspects are at-large. Ynet reports that Turkish customs officials raided the home of an Iranian couple suspected of involvement in the smuggling operation. But the two weren’t at the house, and police are still seeking their whereabouts, Ynet says.

    via Turkey, Germany arrest Iranians in nuclear smuggling scheme – Washington Times.

  • Dual citizenship in Germany

    Dual citizenship in Germany

    The Economist March 2nd 2013

    Jus sanguinis revisited

    BERLIN

    How not to treat people with more than one passport

    THE case of a woman from Hanau, in Hesse, shows why Kenan Kolat, leader of Germany’s Turks, calls the German citi­zenship law “absurdity cubed.” Born in Germany to Turkish parents, she was a dual citizen. According to the law, she had to relinquish one passport between her 18th and 23rd birthday. She chose to forgo the Turkish one. But the Turkish bureauc­racy was slow, her birthday came and her German citizenship went instead.

    International law has never fully em­braced multiple citizenship. Many coun­tries frown on it, though others take a more relaxed attitude. Germany, however, man­ages to make it especially complicated for citizens of foreign origin. Its traditional ap­proach goes back to a law passed before the first world war. Based on jus sanguinis (“right of blood”), it gave citizenship to any­body of German descent, but not to for­eigners born in Germany, as countries such as America and France that practise jus soli (“right of soil”) do. Then, in 1999, a centre-left government added the two no­tions together. This would have let a wom­an born in Germany to Turkish parents be simultaneously German and Turkish. But that law coincided with a regional election in Hesse, where the centre-right Christian Democratic Union (cdu) seized on the is­sue to mobilise its conservative base in op­position. The cdu won the state and took control of the upper. house, where it blocked the new law.

    A compromise was reached in 2000. Children born in Germany to foreign parents after 1990 can get two passports but have to choose one citizenship before they are 23. This year, the first cohort of such children, about 3,300, reach that age. From 2018 the number will reach 40,000 a year or more. There are about half a million such cases all told, more than two-thirds of them of Turkish descent.

    Yet not all young dual citizens must choose. A child born to a German parent in America, say, retains both passports for life. So does a child born to a Greek or Spanish parent in Germany, because dual citizenship is allowed for members of the European Union and Switzerland. This seems unfair to the Turks. This week Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish prime minis­ter, said as much to Angela Merkel, Ger­many’s chancellor, during her visit to Tur­key. (Mrs Merkel also explained that, though happy for Turkey’s eu accession talks to continue, she retained her “scepti­cism” about its ever becoming a member.)

    Besides being unjust and creating two classes of citizens, the law is a nightmare to administer, says Ulrich Kober at Bertels­mann Stiftung, a think-tank. Because coun­tries like Iran do not let citizens renounce their citizenship and others make it costly or difficult, German law in theory grants exceptions. But the rules are not clear, reck­ons Kay Hailbronner, a lawyer. To make the decisions even more arbitrary, the 16 German states process the paperwork, and each uses different forms.

    dualcitizen

    Backing Turkey and Germany together

    What better way to irritate those citi­zens whom Germany’s politicians say they want to integrate? Mr Kober thinks Germany should simply allow dual citi­zenship. So do the centre-left parties hop­ing to replace Mrs Merkel’s government in September’s election, as well as the cdu’s coalition partner, the Free Democratic Party. It may yet happen. •

  • German defense minister vows to address troop ‘problems’ in Turkey

    German defense minister vows to address troop ‘problems’ in Turkey

    German Defense Minister Thomas de Maiziere has admitted that conditions could be better for Bundeswehr troops stationed in Turkey. After a report that was critical of the situation, the minister promised improvements.

    0,,16536170_303,00German Defense Minister Thomas de Maiziere admitted he had noted that there were issues to address while on a visit to the site where German soldiers are deployed.

    “Even though I tend to be shown the better side of how things are, I also perceived that there were certain problems,” de Maiziere told the German mass circulation daily Bild’s Saturday edition.

    De Maiziere stressed that the armed forces first had to ensure that they could fulfil their mission. At present, he said, the most important aspect was to improve troop conditions.

    Striking a diplomatic note, de Maiziere said that Turkey had gone to great lengths to provide good accommodation. He added that work on new quarters was being completed.

    “When this new accommodation is ready, a lot of things will change when it comes to the issues that have been brought up,” he said.

    DW.DE

    Why were German soldiers ‘attacked’ in Turkey?

    The recent attack on German soldiers by a group of Turkish nationalists in Iskenderun reveals the distrust some Turks feel toward the West, NATO and the US. It seems likely that more protests will follow. (24.01.2013)

    De Maiziere made the comments after a report by Germany’s special commissioner for the armed forces, Hellmut Königshaus, which said that cooperation between the German and Turkish contingents was “perceived mainly as a problem.”

    The report said that meals were monotonous and that usually there was only cold food. Toilets were described as “filthy,” most of them having no flush. The bodies of dead dogs, shot by the Turkish soldiers, had been left to decompose on the site.

    ‘No fraternization’

    Soldiers’ post was being held back so that it did not reach them for days, or even weeks, the document went on. Soldiers had to change euros in privately owned currency exchange offices, at poor rates.

    He said Turkish officials have reprimanded German soldiers for contact with their Turkish counterparts. One German female soldier was allegedly pushed by a Turkish general during a visit by de Maiziere to the base at Kahramanmaras. She later complained of bruising.

    De Maiziere made the visit in February with his Dutch counterpart Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaer. Kahramanmaras lies some 100 kilometers (60 miles) from the Syrian border, with some 300 German troops manning NATO-deployed anti-missile batteries.

    Germany, the Netherlands and the US are each operating two batteries to help protect Turkey from possible missiles launched in Syria.

    rc / ccp (AFP, dpa, Reuters)

    via German defense minister vows to address troop ‘problems’ in Turkey | News | DW.DE | 02.03.2013.

  • Germany Opposition Says Turkey’s EU Membership ‘Win-Win’

    Germany Opposition Says Turkey’s EU Membership ‘Win-Win’

    The leader of Germany’s opposition voiced support on Friday for Turkey’s full membership of the EU, describing it as a “win-win” for Ankara and Europe.

    w460

    Turkey’s efforts to join the 27-member bloc have stalled in recent years, largely due to its long-running dispute with Cyprus and fierce opposition from other EU states.

    “I don’t know at which time Turkey can join the European Union but I know that for the future of the union, it is necessary to have Turkey in,” Sigmar Gabriel, of the Social Democrats, told reporters in Ankara.

    “For the future of the EU, cooperation with Turkey is a key,” he said, adding that Ankara’s membership was a “win-win situation for Turkey and Europe”.

    Turkey, an associate member of the old European Economic Community since 1963, first sought to become an EU member in 1987 but only launched formal accession talks eight years ago.

    Germany, one of the EU heavyweights along with France that opposes Turkey’s membership, has offered a “privileged membership” compromise that falls short of Ankara’s aspirations.

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel, on an official visit to Ankara on Monday, said she had concerns over Turkey’s full membership but added that the entry process should be kept on track.

    Gabriel said the bloc’s influence would diminish “if we are not able to have Turkey on board”.

    But he called on Ankara to reform its justice system when asked about its record of jailing journalists.

    “We cannot understand (why) people are jailed because of only their opinion,” he said.

    Turkey is under fire from the EU and human rights groups over the number of journalists it holds behind bars, tainting its prospects as a candidate nation.

    Ankara insists no one is jailed because of their profession but due to membership of an illegal organization.

    via Germany Opposition Says Turkey’s EU Membership ‘Win-Win’ — Naharnet.

  • Merkel’s Visit to Turkey Marks a Positive Change of Mind

    Merkel’s Visit to Turkey Marks a Positive Change of Mind

    As the eurozone crisis shows signs of further deepening with the new uncertainties in the wake of Italian ‘non-elections’, Germany is increasingly under strain to keep the European Union intact.

    Berlin has to deal not only with the brewing anti-austerity and anti-unionism in the Mediterranean strip of the EU (all the way from Cyprus through Portugal, except, perhaps, France), but also with an uneasy Britain and loudly impatient Turkey on the continent’s both flanks.

    In that context, German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s visit to Turkey must be added as another positive step toward melting the icy relationship between Ankara and the EU.

    It follows two other important recent steps. First, France unblocked a chapter (of five) of Ankara’s negotiations with Brussels, coming during its current peace talks with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), and secondly, Greek Cypriots overwhelmingly (57.5 percent) voted for the Democratic Rally (DISY) leader, Nicos Anastasiades in the presidential election, a strong signal of a mood change on the island.

    Merkel’s visit was long overdue. It has been well-noted that she has visited Turkey only once in three years, while Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has visited Germany four times.

    Should it be interpreted as the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) now being in accord with its coalition partner, the Free Democratic Party (FDP), about the strategic importance, economic performance and crucial democratic transformation of Turkey? Perhaps. Does this mean that the German chancellor comes closer to CDU heavyweights who have been vocally pro-Turkish membership, such as Ruprecht Polenz, Chariman of the Bundestag’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, and gets ready to be challenged by others within?

    Could be. Deep down she knows that she has the backing of those CDU strong figures, on central and local level, although a few, about remaining committed to coalition protocol on Turkey’s accession and support for it to continue. But a slight challenge nevertheless.

    No matter what,one can hope that the visit and the positive sound of her messages indicate a long-lasting change of mind.

    Cynics in Turkey and Germany think they have seen “no progress” between Erdoğan and Merkel on Turkey’s EU accession process. Populist Bild Zeitung, in another outburst of sensationalist Turkophobia, totally insensitive to Turkey’s internationally important democratization process as ever, declared that ‘Turkey would never be a full member of the EU’ — despite its powerful economy. (This view reveals more about some parts of the Europe than Turkey itself).

    Bild is joined in Turkey by voices that have been anti-reform, anti-AKP and anti-Europe.

    The truth, and the good news, is, Merkel not only endorsed France’s unblocking move, but also signaled that other chapters may follow, with perhaps a second one even before the end of the Irish term presidency in the EU. One understands that she needs to balance very carefully in an election year for Germany on a subject which can shake and stir the votes.

    There are many aspects to why Germany should be more active, frank and clear about its relations with Turkey and its policy on the EU negotiations. Pro-EU arguments based on today’s Turkish economy speak for themselves, as outlined by Kemal Derviş, the vice president of the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., and a former minister of economic affairs of Turkey, for the daily Handelsblatt on Feb. 25, 2013 in an article titled “Die Politik ist am Zug” (“The policy is on track”).

    Apart from fine figures on inflation, growth, reduced deficit, employment, strong currency and reserves, German politicians do look with admiration at “hardworking” Turks (a virtue they value highly), when they compare them with the Mediterranean citizens of the EU.

    Turkey with such an economy is now too big for Germany to ignore, and far too important to be seen only as a simple trading partner, no doubt. Therefore, the tough visa regulations and the particularly rigid implementation of it attributed to German general councils in Turkey must be eased — liberalized in the sense that, once having passed a security check, Turkish citizens must be given five-year, multiple-entry Schengen visas.

    Nor should there be any doubt that increasing defense cooperation through NATO on Syria creates a new momentum for Berlin to realize more deeply Turkey’s significance on the southeastern flank of the continent, as it shoulders increasing burdens. Stability in Turkey, in that sense, can be said to be serving the stability of Germany, and of Europe as a whole.

    Merkel did not say much on Turkey’s Kurdish peace process, but given the presence of large, politicized Turkish communities; Alevi and Kurdish diasporas in her own country — take it for granted that solutions on all social rifts here will ease tensions there. Interests overlap.

    And in that case, it is demanded that Germany more thoroughly consider indirect, discreet assistance to endorse Turkey in its struggle against historical demons. The EU membership process, kept alive and well, is the best help.

    What Bild Zeitung and other populist tabloids do miss is that, what still matters most for Turkey’s reformist camp is the perspective of, and not necessarily, membership.

    Given the current turmoil and identity crisis the EU is in, it can be said that there will have to be referendums on Turkish membership — in Europe and Turkey – between now and the final decision. The process is still premature: It needs a decade or more. So, no need for myopia.

    Merkel is certainly right in her arguments about Cyprus (that Turkey opens its sea and airports to its flights and vessels), even if it is an issue that still needs time, given the stalemate. Before that, both sides on the island must show a concrete, willful progress on reaching a settlement.

    It has become also clear that Erdoğan is willing to resolve the issue in a broader context.

    He expects a complementary signal from Anastasiades, and has in mind a “package solution” that should involve Cypriots as well as Greece, energy, security and economic cooperation in Eastern Mediterranean, with the backing of Britain and the U.S.

    Germany can play a crucial role, in both EU and NATO context, if Erdoğan’s ideas make any sense.

  • Germany Shuts Down Reactors, Turkey Builds, Why?

    Germany Shuts Down Reactors, Turkey Builds, Why?

    NİLAY VARDAR REPORTED FROM GERMANY

    Germany Shuts Down Reactors, Turkey Builds, Why?

    While Turkey is eagerly signing deals to establish its first nuclear power plant in a foreseeable future without discussing potential perils of nuclear energy, Germany has been dealing with nuclear waste for the past 35 years.

    Nilay VARDAR

    490-254

    * At a salt mine 930 meters below ground

    Following the disaster in Fukushima, Germany has decided to shut down all its nuclear reactors by 2022. The decision also re-ignited the nuclear waste storage issue that troubled the country for 35 years.

    Located two hours away from Berlin, the district of Gorleben has become a major destination in Germany anti-nuclear lobby, especially when truck loads of nuclear waste are being transferred to a storage facility at a nearby salt mine underground.

    Along with a dozen journalists from Turkey, I was invited by Henrich Böll Stiftung Foundation to visit nuclear waste storage facilities in Gorleben, Germany.

    No consensus on ultimate storage facilities

    One of the most controversial aspects of nuclear energy is its waste storage. No country, so far, has resolved this issue. Scientists have yet to reach an agreement on whether it is safer to store nuclear waste in ultimate storage facilities underground or just on more ordinary storage facilities on the ground. In 2005, Germany banned the re-usage of nuclear waste in various side industries, saying that it might fall into the hands of terrorists who might potentially use it as a weapon.

    Turkey never discussed nuclear waste

    No nuclear waste management plan has been announced by Turkish government yet. There are rumors that Russia might purchase nuclear waste produced from Turkey’s first reactor in Akkuyu, Mersin province.

    Upon their activation, nuclear reactors start producing nuclear waste. Initially, this waste is contaminated in barrels and transferred to an intermediate storage facility where it is kept for 40 years. Nonetheless, some waste material doesn’t lose radioactivity for 250,000 years and there are endless debates on how to store or restore them.

    More than 35 years to complete facility

    * Ultimate nuclear waste storage facility located 3 kilometers away from a river

    Pioneers in nuclear waste storage research, Finland and Sweden are making plans to store their nuclear waste in granite rocks, while Germany decided to do the same in salt mines. The decision on the storage material depends on the distribution of geological resources. Establishing its first nuclear power plant in 1968, Germany has chosen the salt mines located in Gorloben as its major nuclear waste storage area. However, the decision has been out off for 10 years due to political reasons, and now an implementation is on the way to resolve the political disagreement. Because the inhabitants of Gorloben has never been persuaded on the security of nuclear waste storage facility with a solid scientific evidence.

    Waste to be store in salt

    A delegation of 9 journalists from Turkey have been 930 meters below ground to see the salt mines in Gorloben. Germany spend over 1,6 million euros to establish the facility and there is still the risk that it cant be activated due to pressure from local lobbies.

    The facility experts claim that salt mineral doesn’t contaminate gases for at least 250 million years. In this way, they hope to store the waste in salt crystals.

    There is no “0 risks”

    There is no “0 risks”, experts said. “The whole point is to store the waste as secure as possible.” The German government is looking for ways to reach the waste 500 years later in case new technologies will make it possible to re-use or recycle the nuclear material. However, nobody can estimate from now what earth will look like in 500 years.

    At the intermediate storage level

    After visiting the ultimate waste storage area below ground, we went to the intermediate storage level which costs 50 million euros to Germany and two thirds of it full already. The facility will leave its post to the ultimate storage facility once the project is complete.

    Jürgen Auer, PR representative of the facility, said the barrels did not contaminate any radiation at all, but it risked becoming a target of terrorist attacks. “The ultimate storage facilities are cost-efficient and we are insisting to build them because of moral responsibility,” he said.

    Salt mine security issues

    Lately, there has been a flooding accident in another salt mine in Asse, Germany. Even though Germany insists that below ground facilities are the safest way to store nuclear waste, the incident proved once more of potential risks. Now nobody knows how water will evacuated from the storage facility. The situation of stored nuclear waste is also unknown.

    Farmers of Gorloben

    Following our facility visits, we went to downtown Gorloben where people seemed not happy at all to have a nuclear storage facility right outside their city.

    “We chose a yellow cross (which looks like the letter x) sign to represent the arrival of trainloads of nuclear waste, because we don’t know when they are coming,” a farmer said.

    These yellow cross signs are ubiquitous around the city. Some farmers attempt to block the railway with their vehicles. Others even pave the railway with yellow pyramid-shaped bricks and out their hand in them. Farmers claimed that they have been assaulted by police forces to stop their protests. During the latest protest, the farmers blocked the railway for 15 hours.

    Farmer struggle resumes

    Monica Tietke, an organic farmer, said her family was in the business for 450 years.

    “We don’t know how this facility will affect our farms here. There is no guarantee that it won’t affect the environment and people surrounding the area,” she said.

    Tietke said Gorlebon farmers has been struggling to stop the facility construction for the past 35 years.

    “There are controversies surrounding the facility. We had pine forests in the forests and many believe that a recent arson was caused by the facility construction. It might be a sabotage even.”

    Gorleben farmers also said they have taken legal action to stop the facility from activating in the near future. “We want a reassessment of environmental costs. Until then, we will continue blocking the railways.” (NV/BM)