Category: Germany

With an estimated number of at least 2.1 million Turks in Germany, they form the largest ethnic minority. The vast majority are found in what used to be West Germany. Berlin, Frankfurt,Hamburg, Rhine-Ruhr (Cologne, Duisburg and Dortmund) have large Turkish communities. The state with the largest Turkish population is North Rhine-Westphalia.

  • Is China in the Bible?

    Is China in the Bible?

    From the December 2010 Trumpet Print Edition »

    Bearded Dragon from CyprusThe scriptural, prophetic identity of the most populous nation on the planet.

    BY DAVID VEJIL

    China: The Next Superpower.” “China: America’s Number-One Enemy.”

    Such headlines have become common. It is logical that the nation with nearly 20 percent of the world’s population, the second-biggest economy and the biggest military (in terms of manpower) would inspire such discussion.

    But will China become the world’s next superpower? The truth is, you cannot know China’s future unless you understand that nation’s identity in the Bible, the only source that can reveal the answer!

    Yes, if you believe the Bible, you can actually know for certain—without a doubt—who will dominate the world very shortly!

    Hundreds of think tanks spend countless hours and vast sums of money in search of an answer to this question. Yet, the Bible reveals the answer—if they would only believe!

    The Bible is a book primarily about Israel, physical and spiritual. When other nations are mentioned, it is typically in relation to Israel. In biblical times, the interaction between the Chinese and the Israelites was of no major consequence, and so China was rarely mentioned.

    However, the Bible does speak prophetically of China’s role in end-time events. Technological advances in communication and trade have shrunken the distance between China and the modern descendants of Israel considerably (for an explanation of who these nations are, request our free book The United States and Britain in Prophecy). Today China has considerable global influence: Witness, for example, the amount of U.S. debt China holds and the huge trade imbalance between the two nations, and the fact that China is the world’s most dominant trading nation.

    An understanding of these prophecies hinges on knowing the biblical identity of the Chinese people. Before delving into this, however, we must gain a basic overview of Chinese history.

    A Brief History of a Great People

    The Chinese people comprise one dominant ethnic group and many small minorities. The ethnic Han comprise more than 90 percent of the 1.3 billion people living in China. Though minority ethnic groups—such as the Uygurs, Tibetans, Mongols and Manchu—make up a small percentage of the Chinese population, in absolute numbers they are still large populations. For example, there are actually more Mongols living in China than in Mongolia.

    These other ethnic groups have been absorbed into China through conquest by the Han Chinese. The Han have long dominated the heartland of China, usually defined by the Yellow River in the north, the Yangtze in the middle and the Pearl River on the south. This rich agricultural region is surrounded by border regions occupied by non-Han peoples, such as Tibet, Xinjiang (home of the Muslim Uighurs), Inner Mongolia and Manchuria, the historical name given to the territory north of North Korea.

    Historically, fierce nomadic cavalry armies from the northern border regions have posed a difficult challenge to the agriculture-based Chinese. The incursions motivated the building of the Great Wall.

    When the Han were strong, just like today, the border regions were under their rule. When they were weak, they lost control of those buffer regions and in some cases were even invaded by their Turkic and Mongol neighbors.

    The foreign invaders all achieved measures of success, controlling portions of Chinese territory for various periods, mainly in northern China. The most complete conquest was the Mongol invasion started by Genghis Khan in the a.d. 1200s: The resulting dynasty fully controlled China for a century.

    All these invasions had one thing in common, however: They all met their end by the Han Chinese.

    No matter which foreign invader occupied the throne, China always remained Chinese.

    One remarkable demonstration of the resilience of their society and culture was the survival, amid all the invasions, of the Chinese language—a feat few other languages have managed.

    This was partly due to the size of the Han population. In a.d. 2, the first available census shows a Chinese population of about 60 million, one fourth of the world’s population at the time!

    To better rule this immense population, nomadic invaders typically adopted Chinese administration techniques and the Chinese language, a language quite unrelated to their own. Eventually their descendents adopted Chinese culture and the agricultural lifestyle as well. When the Han reasserted themselves, they easily absorbed the invaders that remained.

    All the mixing and migrating of different peoples has made it impossible to characterize what a pure ethnic Han is. Nevertheless, prophetically speaking, China refers to all the people of China, not just the Han ethnic group. And at any rate, the Chinese and all the minority groups living in China are of the Mongoloid race, which stems from Noah’s son Japheth.

    The Mongoloid Race

    As Herbert W. Armstrong taught throughout his ministry, Noah’s son Japheth married a woman of the yellow race, and went on to father the Mongoloid people. The Hebrew word Japheth means enlargement, according to The Zondervan Pictorial Bible Dictionary,and a glance at the modern world shows that the Oriental populations have been enlarged and multiplied to an unparalleled degree. Japheth’s descendants have long been the most populous people on Earth, with the bulk living in China, Southeast Asia and Japan.

    Genesis 10:2-5 show that the enlargement of Japheth began with the patriarch himself siring seven sons and an untold number of daughters. Obviously, these sons and daughters were a mix between the Caucasoid and Mongoloid races, the latter of which grew more definitive in subsequent generations. Soon after the dispersion at the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:8), Japheth’s descendants migrated through Central Asia to the lands they occupy now.

    One of the seven sons of Japheth bears special importance to the prophetic identity of the Chinese and even their nomadic neighbors. That is Magog, the second son of Japheth mentioned in Genesis 10:2.

    Where Did Magog Go?

    Again, the Bible deals primarily with Israel. Since Magog’s descendants migrated to an area largely independent of the civilizations developing in the Middle East, no sons of Magog are listed in Scripture.

    However, Jewish historian Josephus indicated where Magog’s descendants settled. He wrote in the first century, “Magog founded those that from him were named Magogites, but who are by the Greeks called Scythians” (The Complete Works of Josephus).

    In a prophecy in Ezekiel 38, the Bible labels this vast territory of northern Eurasia where the Scyths lived—a region that stretched from the Russian steppes east into modern-day China and Mongolia—as Magog.

    This territory contained many different tribes of people of the white and yellow races, all of whom were called Scyths or Scythians by the Greeks (see last month’s installment in this series). The Ezekiel 38 prophecy demonstrates this as well, listing numerous nations and peoples associated with or dwelling “in the land of Magog.” The people who most prominently settled this land are typically identified as Mongolic and Turkic. The name Mongol is even derived from the name Magog.

    The ancient history of this land is a story about different Turkic and Mongolic tribes vying for control of the area. Whenever a tribe grew strong enough, it would rule the area; in rare cases—such as with the Huns, Seljuk Turks and Mongols—if these nomadic tribes consolidated enough power, they conquered lands beyond their own.

    The resulting conquests led to much cultural and genetic intermixing with the people of Central Asia—and makes their national borders largely irrelevant to defining their ethnic backgrounds.

    Today the land the Bible calls Magog is dominated in the west by Russia—which is reasserting control over the region it once possessed through the ussr—and China in the east.

    Details of the ancient history of Magog and its people remain obscure since the Turks and Mongols didn’t develop a written language until after their contact with the Chinese or Persian civilizations. Though these nomadic peoples have a sketchy history, they still play an important role in understanding China’s prophetic role.

    While the Mongols’ connection to Magog is most obvious, they were just one tribe of a related people that carry the biblical name Magog. Ezekiel 38 is a prophecy about the land of Magog and all the distant “cousins” that live there and are associated with each other, such as the Russians and Chinese. One of the Mongolic nomadic tribes in this area bears a special relationship with China. They are the Khitan, a people responsible for China’s modern name and one of China’s biblical names, Chittim.

    China Is Chittim

    Isaiah 23:1 has a prophecy about “the land of Chittim.” To which modern nation does this end-time prophecy apply? This biblical name refers to both the island of Cyprus and to the nation of China, whose progenitors first populated Cyprus and gave it its name.

    Jewish historian Josephus records that some descendants of Japheth—such as the families of Gomer, Tubal and Togarmah—first settled in southern Europe before migrating east into Asia. Kittim was one such family, originally settling lands to the west of Mesopotamia before moving to the Far East.

    Genesis 10:4 lists the sons of Japheth’s fourth-born son: “The sons of Javan were Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim” (New King James Version). Kittim is synonymous with the Chittim of Isaiah’s prophecy. Verse 5 mentions that these sons of Javan settled the isles, or the coasts. This occurred shortly after the dispersion of the Tower of Babel, when the sons of Javan migrated to the northern Mediterranean. These tribes gave their names to various cities and islands, such as Cyprus and Rhodes.

    The Mongoloid types of these families, including the Kittim, did not stay in the Mediterranean, however. Over hundreds of years and many generations, some of these families migrated east into Asia from Cyprus, where they are found today, according to research by Dr. Ernest Martin, formerly of Ambassador College.

    The descendants of Javan’s son Kittim came to Asia some time after many of their cousins had already settled there. After their migration through Central Asia, the Kittim made their appearance in modern-day northern China and Mongolia under the name Khitan in the fourth century a.d. In the 10th century, the Khitan people managed to create a dynasty that subjugated the peoples, including the Chinese, in modern-day northern China. Their territory stretched from what is now Korea to eastern Kazakhstan, including Beijing, the seat of government in China today.

    Because the Khitans controlled the overland trade and communication route from China through Central Asia to Europe, China was called Cathay, after the Khitans. The designation first applied to north China, but later designated all of China. It is a name the Russians still use for China today.

    Isaiah 23:1-3 reveal that Chittim, modern-day China, will form a part of a global economic market along with Europe, one that is prophesied to shut out the nations of Israel. It should be no surprise that China will be an integral part of this economic partnership with Europe, as it is now the world’s greatest exporter. These two trading blocs will soon dominate the global economy!

    The history of the Khitan demonstrates what has happened to many of the Mongolic tribes that once roamed the western portions of what the Bible calls Magog. These nomadic tribes were not considered Chinese when they were conquering the Han civilization, but after centuries of living inside China’s borders, much of their populations have been ethnically absorbed by the Han Chinese. Whatever remnants of these Mongolic nomads that have managed to remain distinct, such as the Mongols, are now classified as ethnic minorities in China.

    In the Khitan’s case, their absorption was so complete that an ethnic minority group from their descendants doesn’t even exist!

    The history of these nomads shows just how strong a connection China has with biblical Magog. To a certain degree, they even share the same borders and the same people. But if this explains the Mongolic nomads whose descendants now live in northern China, what about the original Han people who settled and continue to live in China’s heartland?

    Handling the Han

    The history of the Han Chinese is much less obscure. In fact, the Han people record their history all the way back to the time of the Tower of Babel!

    Ancient Chinese records speak of China’s first emperors, Yaou, Shun and Yu.

    One such record, The Shoo King, explains that one of Yaou’s tasks was to deal with the effects of a great flood that ravaged the land: “Destructive in their overflow are the waters of the inundation. In their vast extent they embrace the mountains and overtop the hills.”

    While scholars explain the inundation as a local flood in China, it is clear from the biblical account, God’s sacred Word, that these annals are talking about Noah’s Flood. Consider:

    During Yaou’s lifetime a new leader, Shun, came to power. According to another ancient Chinese manuscript, The Bamboo Annals, Shun is described as having a “black body.” He was obviously not Chinese, and his mother was called “the queen mother of the west,” indicating him as a foreigner. The Shoo King gives the name of Shun’s father as Koo-sow.

    According to Dr. Herman Hoeh’s Compendium of World History, this Shun was none other than the Nimrod of the Bible. Therefore Koo-sow, which can also be spelled Kusou, is Nimrod’s father Cush! And the “queen mother of the west” can only be Semiramis. She was the mother-wife of Nimrod who called herself “queen of heaven,” as documented in Alexander Hislop’s Two Babylons. These are the three principal figures of man’s rebellion at the Tower of Babel.

    Nimrod was a son of Cush and therefore of the black race. The Bible describes him as a mighty rebellious leader who caused the people to revolt against God shortly after the Flood (Genesis 10:8-9). He gathered the different races and peoples together to build the Tower of Babel, but was stopped when God intervened and confused the languages (Genesis 11:1-7). The different races and peoples were then scattered to different areas of the world (verse 8).

    At that point, Yu became the next ruler. Yu, China’s first great hero, founded the Xia dynasty; from that point forward, leadership was given on a hereditary basis. The return of government to a Chinese ruler indicates that the Chinese immediately left the area of Babel and broke free from Nimrod and his successors’ rule. Under Chinese rulers, they migrated to their modern-day location.

    The chronology as presented by The Shoo King places the rules of these three kings toward the end of the third millennia b.c. (The Chinese Classics). This time frame also agrees with the Bible.

    The Chinese have preserved the most complete secular history of their civilization, dating back more than 4,000 years. There is a lot of myth and legend included as well, but the general chronology of emperors is verified by archeological finds, as well as what is recorded in Scripture.

    Archeological Proof

    Western scholars and the Chinese themselves, heavily influenced by Western thought after the 1920s, believed the Xia dynasty and the history immediately following were mere inventions, mythical heroes and kingdoms.

    However, an archeological find in 1959 at Erlitou in the western part of the Henan province revealed an early Chinese society dating back to the same time and place that The Shoo King records the Xia dynasty existed! The city found at Erlitou is the largest of all cities found dating to this time period and is believed to be the capital city of the Xia government.

    Since that find in the North China Plain off the Yellow River, archeologists have found some 200 sites revealing the same culture throughout a broad area, demonstrating a rapid settlement and urbanization during 1900 to 1500 b.c. This was the formation of the first Chinese state! (The Chinese Neolithic: Trajectories to Early States).

    The Bamboo Annals records the existence of other Chinese states and how the Xia rulers expanded their control over them. Archeologists have found evidence of other Chinese states, but none contained as many settlements as those closely identified with the city found in Erlitou where the Xia ruled—clearly the center of power of the first post-Flood Chinese civilization.

    Interestingly, the archeological record shows a period of extremely low-population settlement in the period immediately before the Erlitou culture arrived. The archeologists, steeped in evolutionary thought, call the time before the Flood the Neolithic period. They have found evidence of a thriving civilization in China in this time period, followed by a contraction in settlement, with evidence pointing to drastic flooding in the region (ibid.).

    Though the archeologists won’t admit it, this is evidence of a great flood followed by a resettlement of the area led by the Xia dynasty!

    Back to Gog and Magog

    So if history is clear that Shun is Nimrod, who are Yaou and Yu? How do these names fit in our biblical identity?

    A basic understanding of Ezekiel 38 gives us that information. That chapter speaks of the land of Magog and specific people or peoples living in that land: “Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog” (verse 2). Gog and Magog are also mentioned together in Revelation 20:8, showing a close connection between the land and peoples. When Arab historians talked of the Mongols, they used the terms Yagog and Magog.

    According to Dr. Hoeh, Yaou in Chinese history is likely the same person the Arabs call Yagog in their tradition. Every prophetic indication is that China has a strong connection with Gog and Magog. Ezekiel 38:2 refers to China. Along with Russia, China dominates the entire area of Magog and is associated with the nations listed in subsequent verses.

    Therefore, the Chinese Han people were ruled first by a Japhetic descendant associated with Magog—possibly his son, though the Bible doesn’t say specifically. During Nimrod’s rebellion at the Tower of Babel, the Chinese were ruled by Nimrod. After his reign, when God intervened and changed the languages, government over the Chinese returned to the Japhetic line, under Yu’s rule. These people then migrated north and east to modern-day China, setting up their capital in the North China Plain at the end of the third millennium b.c.

    The location of China helps reveal other biblical identities as well.

    Kings of the East

    In a prophecy recorded in Daniel 11, a clash is foretold between “the king of the north,” a German-led European power, and “the king of the south,” a radical Islamic power led by Iran (these prophetic identities are explained in our booklets Germany and the Holy Roman Empire and The King of the South, both free upon request). Emerging victorious, the European army is then prophesied to conquer the tiny Jewish nation now called Israel. At that point, verse 44 foretells, “tidings out of the east and out of the north shall trouble” this European king.

    Any map will show that north and east of Jerusalem are Russia and China, the two dominant powers of the land biblically referred to as Magog!

    This event is further expounded in Revelation 16:12, where it is prophesied that the “kings of the east” will gather an army that numbers 200 million soldiers! (Revelation 9:14-16). Such a vast army could only be assembled with the massive population of China. Clearly China is one of those kings of the east!

    So back to our original question: Will China become the world’s next dominating superpower after the decline of the U.S.? The answer is no!

    Though it will grow to tremendous world power, even superpower status—especially through economic means, as indicated in Isaiah 23—it will not rise to the top spot. That position will be filled by the European power led by Germany! After a short economic partnership, China will violently contend with the king of the north for global dominance.

    But this war will end when Jesus Christ returns and destroys both powers!

    After that, according to biblical prophecy, Christ will restore His government on Earth, a government that will bring peace and prosperity for 1,000 years. Yet Ezekiel 38 prophesies that not every nation will submit to Christ’s rule voluntarily. Soon after the Second Coming, the people of Asia will form an army in order to attack the people living in Jerusalem!

    This will be the last great rebellion in the 1,000-year period. Christ will utterly destroy it and deliver His people. It is a grand statement from God: “Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the Lord” (Ezekiel 38:23).

    Believing the Bible gives us an understanding of ancient Chinese history that scholars reject, and reveals the future status of China and major events this world power will participate in. But even more, it gives us the final and inspiring end result: Christ establishing His Kingdom on Earth!

    God is offering the wonderful opportunity to know, now, who is the Lord! Horrible wars are prophesied to occur shortly, but God will deliver His people, those who know He is the Lord and rely on Him. That should lead to the next big question: Are you one of those?

    For further study, order a free copy of our booklet Russia and China in Prophecy.

  • Isolation for Germany’s Immigrant Pols

    Isolation for Germany’s Immigrant Pols

    Cabinet appointments in Lower Saxony normally don’t receive much attention. But political success is rare for minorities in Germany, and in April, Aygül Özkan—a little-known politician of Turkish descent—was heralded as a trailblazer for becoming the state’s social-affairs minister. Her quick fall from grace shows how calcified Germany’s system remains against candidates of immigrant descent. The tide began turning against Özkan when she told a German magazine that crucifixes (and other religious symbols, such as headscarves) don’t belong in state-run schools, an opinion shared by Germany’s highest court. The statement led to a media firestorm; members of Özkan’s party—Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservative Christian Democratic Union—rushed to denounce the remarks. Then, in July, she caused another PR fiasco by asking journalists to sign a contract promising supportive coverage of her department’s affairs. Her appointment has since been roundly declared a flop.

    Nigel Treblin / AFP-Getty Images Aygül Özkan
    Nigel Treblin / AFP-Getty Images Aygül Özkan

    The young politician has found herself ensnared in a trap that plagues many minority candidates, says Turkish-German author Mely Kiyak. In addition to letting race and religion (Özkan is Muslim) define her term, Özkan has come across as a neophyte unworthy of her promotion. “There is a cliché, and she made the cliché,” Kiyak says. But Kiyak also criticizes the CDU for hanging Özkan out to dry. Özkan’s appointment was expected to help the party reach out to Germany’s growing segment of ethnic minorities, now 18 percent of the population. Now it has cautiously pulled away its support. “No one is protecting her,” Kiyak says.

    Like minority politicians elsewhere in the EU, such as France’s Rachida Dati—who weathered her own PR storms after receiving a key cabinet post—ethnic Turkish politicians in Germany are often isolated from the pack. During elections, for example, they tend to land in so-called alibi spots—on the party lists somewhere, but out of reach of a seat. Only 21 of the 612 members of the Bundestag have an immigrant background. Two years ago, when veteran pol Cem Özdemir rose to become co-chair of the German Green Party, its leadership denied him an expected Bundestag seat. Özdemir has since kept a low profile. He also keeps his Turkish heritage in the background, addressing hot-button immigration issues such as education in terms of class instead of race—a path ethnic Turkish politicians are too often forced to take.

    Source: Newsweek

  • Germany’s Cem Ozdemir Talks Integration

    Germany’s Cem Ozdemir Talks Integration

    German Green party co-leader Cem Özdemir has lately been a thorn in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s side, challenging her on a controversial rail project in his home state of Baden-Württemberg as the Greens make unprecedented gains there and across the country. With Merkel’s recent claim that multiculturalism has “utterly failed” in Germany, capping months of roiling integration debate, Özdemir—who was the first person of Turkish descent elected to the Bundestag in 1994—is again in the spotlight. He spoke with NEWSWEEK’s Mike Giglio. Excerpts:

    cem ozdemir

    What do you make of the current combative tone of Germany’s immigration debate? Every couple of years we have the same discussion. But every time it gets a little bit more absurd. This time around, [politician] Thilo Sarrazin started the debate with his book [Germany Abolishes Itself] and some of his statements, where he is practically advocating a policy that would take people from certain ethnic backgrounds and promote their having children over others. I don’t have words for it.

    Germany loses far more immigrants than it gains, and overall the population is shrinking. Is this a strange time to be advocating stricter policies? We have a very ironic situation in which the business community and the Greens are fighting together for a more liberal immigration policy, while conservatives who claim to be close to the business community are harming the German economy.

    Why is Angela Merkel jumping into this discussion now? She’s trying to prove to the right wing of the party that she can be tough. She’s trying to push forward a more radical line, and part of it is that she’s now shying away from multiculturalism. A Protestant lady, without children, being divorced, coming from the East as the chancellor of Germany, would have been completely unthinkable without multiculturalism. So in a way she should be thankful that we have a multicultural society. If you talk about multiculturalism, that does not just include people of color.

    You’ve said that what people attribute to integration failure is often an education problem. If I had one free wish to solve the integration problem, it would be to fix our education policy. How do you explain German working-class families that in each generation remain in the same class? Where is the upward mobility in this society? There is no such thing as a German Dream.

    What about Sarrazin’s claim that it’s a problem of religion? It’s obviously not a Muslim problem. People from Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan are extremely successful in Germany. Why? Because these people left their countries as refugees, and most of them are highly skilled. People from Turkey were carefully selected as unskilled labor, because when the [Turkish] guest-worker program was established [in the 1960s], unskilled labor was needed.

    Do you see Germany’s integration debate as part of a larger trend in Europe? The difference is we don’t have a radical populist party so far. Mr. Serrazin is not, to say the least, a very charismatic personality who could unite people under one umbrella. But there is no guarantee that things will stay that way.

    Are you tired of talking about integration? Well, I’ve given up. I know that for the rest of my days I will have to talk about these questions in Germany.

    Source: Newsweek

  • Greens propose simplified citizenship laws for retired immigrants

    Greens propose simplified citizenship laws for retired immigrants

    reisepassGood German is required to get German citizenship. One lawmaker says it’s time to do long-term immigrants a favor and loosen up that rule.

    New legislation introduced in the German parliament could allow certain groups to get a German passport more easily and quickly, as well as granting more people the right to hold dual citizenship.

    Currently, immigrants who want to get German citizenship must take a naturalization test and show that they have a firm grasp of the language. In addition, they generally have to renounce their previous citizenship.

    Pensioners who came to the country as immigrants are one of the groups that would benefit most from a change to the law. If the bill were passed, a person who is over 53 years old and has been living in Germany for at least 15 years could apply for a passport without meeting the language requirements.

    “If a person has made a contribution to this society, I want to make it easier for them to become citizens,” Green party parliamentarian Memet Kilic told Deutsche Welle. “Especially older immigrants – who gave their youth and health to build up this country – should be able to obtain citizenship without a language requirement. That way, we can win the hearts of their children and grandchildren for this country.”

    Integration conversation

    Kilic’s bill comes as the integration of immigrants is under the microscope in Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel, a Christian Democrat, said earlier this month that multiculturalism had failed in Germany. There have also been repeated calls for immigrants to integrate better into German society by learning the language and customs.

    Kilic, who was born in Turkey, said the legislation he sponsored would be welcome news to immigrants.

    “Third-generation immigrant children in Germany hear three times a day that they don’t belong to this country,” he said. “What good is that? I want to turn the tables.”

    In support of the bill, Kilic cited statistics showing that the number of citizens naturalized in Germany each year had fallen by 20 percent since 2004. This was an indication that becoming a German citizen was simply too difficult, he said.

    Without citizenship, many of Germany’s 6.7 million immigrants do not have the right to vote in the country. But citizenship goes beyond the legal realm.

    “Integration means more than simply structural integration,” said Guelistan Guerbey, a political scientist at Berlin’s Free University. “It has a very strong emotional and psychological dimension.”

    This is especially true for dual citizens. If the bill became law, an immigrant would no longer have to give up their passport to become German. Guerbey said this would have a positive effect.

    “A person has emotional ties in both directions,” she said, “and dual citizenship is a legal recognition of this emotional state.”

    Time to learn German

    But while legal benefits and emotional satisfaction might encourage a retired immigrant with less-than-perfect German to apply for citizenship under the loosened rules of the proposed law, they may never get the chance.

    On Thursday in the Bundestag, Reinhard Grindel of the governing Christian Democrats, was clear about what his party thought of the proposal.

    “When someone wants to become a German citizen,” Grindel said, “then I have to be able to say, as an incentive, that you must learn German if you haven’t learned it well enough already. That’s a part of the integration process – to finally learn German.”

    And there is reason to believe that many retired immigrants in Germany wouldn’t apply for a German passport if the rules were loosened. Some come from other European Union countries, where moving across borders isn’t problematic, though they do not have full voting rights in Germany.

    But Kilic says there are some 2,000-3,000 retirees from other countries who would gladly take advantage of the opportunity.

    Author: Matt Zuvela

    Editor: Nancy Isenson

    via Greens propose simplified citizenship laws for retired immigrants | Germany | Deutsche Welle | 29.10.2010.

  • President Wulff describes Turkey trip as extremely successful

    President Wulff describes Turkey trip as extremely successful

    Wrapping up his five-day trip to Turkey, German President Christian Wulff was full of praise for the hosts: In crucial political questions there was broad agreement, he said.

    The German president concluded his trip to Turkey with a call for more exchanges in education, ideas and culture. Christian Wulff and his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul together laid the foundation stone for a new German-Turkish university in Istanbul.

    The project will combine the strength of both of the two countries systems of higher education, President Wulff said. Around 5,000 students are to begin studies at the university next year. German universities are to provide professors and teachers and the courses are to be taught mainly in German.

    Wulff visited the Blue Mosque in Istanbul

    At the close of his visit, Wulff described the five days as “extremely positive.”

    “I have felt at every stage the trust felt towards Germany,” he said on Friday. He said key issues had been discussed openly, and there had been agreement on all the essential political questions. Turkey, he said, was on its way to becoming a successful economy.

    Religion and integration topping the agenda

    Wulff’s visit was the first by a German president to Turkey in more than a decade, and came at a time of heightened tension in Germany itself over the place of its ethnic minorities, of which Turks form the largest group.

    Wulff also became the first German head of state to address the Turkish parliament. In his speech on Tuesday, the president explicitly addressed the problem of the integration of Turkish immigrants in German.

    “Our fellow citizens of Turkish origin are welcome in our country, and belong to our country,” he said. “As their president, I urge every immigrant to actively integrate in German society.”

    Wulff was the first German president to adress the Turkish parliament

    Germany has around four million Muslims among its population of 82 million, with 2.5 million Turks forming the largest ethnic minority.

    Wulff also pushed for more freedom of religion for Christians within Turkey, taking part in a church service in the southern city of Tartus, said to be the birthplace of Paul the Apostle.

    On Friday morning, the German president met with Bartholomew I, the Istanbul-based Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople. He later visited the Blue Mosque and the Hagia Sophia, formerly a Christian church.

    Author: Andreas Illmer (apn, dpa)

    Editor: Chuck Penfold

    via President Wulff describes Turkey trip as extremely successful | Germany | Deutsche Welle | 22.10.2010.

  • German president in Turkey calls for religious freedom

    German president in Turkey calls for religious freedom

    wulff in turkish parliament1

    Germany’s president, visiting Turkey, said Turkish immigrants were a good influence but urged newcomers to “integrate responsibly”.

    Wulff addressed Turkish lawmakers at the parliament in capital Ankara, saying Turkey was a major asset for Europe as a bridge between the East and the West.

    “Many people of Turkish origin have established roots in Germany … many have become German citizens. That is a good sign. I would encourage everyone to integrate responsibly,” Christian Wulff said on Tuesday.

    “Committed to the West with an active and stability-building policy in the East and as a bridge between the East and the West, Turkey is a great asset for Europe,” Wulff said.

    The German president stated that his country monitored closely a recent overhaul of parts of Turkey’s constitution in a referendum, saying “Turkey has moved closer to standards of the European Union by adopting these reforms. I would like to support and encourage you to move ahead on this path.”

    “I believe that Turkey has a great opportunity to show that Islam did not contradict with democracy, the rule of law and pluralism. Turkey reconciles a vibrant Islam with a modern democracy. Turkey looks on both the East and the West. Germany specifically supports the continuation of Turkey’s march on the path to the EU. We are committed to the decision that Turkey’s open-ended negotiations with EU be pursued fairly and expect Turkey to fulfill its own obligations,” Wulff said.

    Wulff noted that Muslims in Germany are “free to practice their religious duties”, which he said was confirmed by the growing number of mosques in the country.

    “We believe that Christian living in Muslim nations also have the same right to live their religions freely. We believe that they must be able to build their churches and train their religious clerks. We believe that people in Turkey and in Germany and in any other country should be granted equal rights and opportunities regardless of their religious backgrounds. We see that Christianity has a long past in Turkey. Christianity obviously belongs to Turkey, too,” Wulff said.

    Wulff said he welcomed the growing number of Turkish people who supported the opening of new churches and the conducting of services there.

    Merkel, who is under pressure from the conservative wing of her Christian Democratic Union, said this weekend Germany’s bid to create a multicultural society had “utterly failed”.

    Earlier this month, following the resignation of central banker Thilo Sarrazin after making blunt comments about Muslims and Jews, Wulff urged Germany to accept its four million Muslims as part of society.

    Wulff said then, “Islam belongs to Germany” and echoed that by saying “Christianity belongs to Turkey”.

    Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan has pledged to expand rights for religious minorities to meet the standards of the European Union.

    President Abdullah Gul met Wulff earlier on Tuesday and thanked him for supporting Germany’s Muslims and backed his calls for newcomers to Germany to integrate.

    “It is a duty for all of us to ensure every citizen speaks the language of the country they reside in fluently,” Gul said. “The use of integration issues for political capital should be avoided, everybody must contribute to a solution instead.”

    Agencies