Category: Cyprus

“The king departed with the entire armada from Tripoli in Libya, and went toward Cyprus, sacking the Turkish coast and setting it red with blood and flames, and they loaded all the ships with the many riches they had taken.” The White Knight: Tirant To Blanc – written and copyrighted by Robert S. Rudder

  • European Council conclusions on Turkey

    European Council conclusions on Turkey

    COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

    Council conclusions on enlargement/stabilisation and association process
    2984th GENERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting

    Brussels, 7 and 8 December 2009

    The Council adopted the following conclusions:

    “ENLARGEMENT STRATEGY

    1. In line with the renewed consensus on enlargement approved by the European Council on 14 and 15 December 2006, and the conclusions of 8 December 2008, the Council welcomes the Commission communication dated 14 October 2009 on Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2009-2010, and takes due note of the conclusions and recommendations therein. The enlargement process gives strong encouragement to political and economic reform in the enlargement countries and reinforces peace, democracy and stability in Europe.

    2. The enlargement countries have been affected, to different degrees, by the global economic recession. The Council confirms that the EU will continue to help them to alleviate the impact of the crisis and prepare for sound recovery. The implementation of EU-related reforms underpins the efforts of the enlargement countries in this regard.

    3. Coherent implementation of the renewed consensus on enlargement which is based on consolidation of commitments, fair and rigorous conditionality, better communication and the EU’s capacity to integrate new members, continues to form the basis for EU action at all stages of the enlargement process, with each country being assessed on its own merits. The rule of law, in particular the fight against corruption and organised crime, as well as strengthening administrative capacity, remains a major challenge which the enlargement countries need to address from an early stage of the process. The Council underlines that problems affecting the freedom of expression and the media need to be tackled as a matter of urgency. The Council continues to attach importance to the quality of the enlargement process and invites the Commission to make use of all instruments of the enlargement process, in particular benchmarks and impact studies.

    4. The Council points out that the negotiating chapters for which technical preparations have been concluded will be opened or closed provisionally in line with the rules of an Inter-Governmental Conference, according to established procedures and in line with the Negotiating Framework.

    5. The Council welcomes the support provided to the enlargement process through financial assistance, in particular in the form of the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA), and emphasises the essential link between enlargement policy priorities and financial assistance, in line with the results from the recent conferences designed to improve aid effectiveness, and welcomes the efforts by the Commission to closely align IPA annual programmes with the priorities identified in the Progress Reports.

    Turkey

    6. The Council welcomes Turkey’s continued commitment to the negotiation process. Positive steps have been registered in the areas of the judiciary, civil-military relations and cultural rights. The Council now expects that the implementation of the National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis, as well as the appointment of a full-time Chief Negotiator, will further focus the Turkish government’s reform efforts.

    7. Furthermore, the Council is encouraged by the government’s democratic initiative, including on the Kurdish issue. This should lead to concrete measures guaranteeing all Turkish citizens full rights and freedoms and should significantly improve the situation in the South-East. The Council welcomes the government’s efforts towards building of a national consensus, which will also be beneficial to the reform process, including the work on a constitutional reform.

    8. The Council invites Turkey to step up the pace of reforms and to implement measures which have been started. Further efforts to ensure that Turkey fully meets the Copenhagen criteria are required in a number of areas, including freedom of expression, freedom of the press, freedom of religion in law and in practice for all religious communities, respect for property rights, trade union rights, rights of persons belonging to minorities, civilian oversight of the military and women’s and children’s rights, anti-discrimination and gender equality. The Council welcomes the declared intention of the government to step up its efforts in the fight against torture and ill-treatment, including on the issue of impunity.

    9. The Council notes that the negotiations have reached a more demanding stage requiring Turkey to step up its efforts in meeting established conditions. By advancing in the fulfilment of opening and closing benchmarks and of the requirements specified in the Negotiating Framework, which cover inter alia implementation of the Accession Partnership and compliance with the obligations stemming from the Association Agreement, Turkey will be able to accelerate the pace of the negotiations.

    10. Turkey is an important regional player, inter alia for the security in the Middle East and the Southern Caucasus and plays a key role in energy supply and the promotion of dialogue between civilisations. The Council thus welcomes the significant diplomatic efforts made to normalise relations with Armenia, resulting in the historic signature of protocols for the normalisation of relations in October 2009. It looks forward to the ratification and implementation of the protocols as soon as possible. The Council welcomes that in July 2009 Turkey signed the Intergovernmental Agreement on the Nabucco gas pipeline and underlines that the timely completion of the Southern corridor remains one of the EU’s highest energy security priorities.

    11. The Council further welcomes the beginning of the reinforced dialogue on migration with Turkey and calls for concrete steps to be taken rapidly, in particular as regards readmission and border control, in accordance with the conclusions of the European Council of June and October 2009. The Council welcomes the start of a new round of talks on an EU-Turkey readmission agreement and stresses that adequate implementation of already existing bilateral readmission agreements remains a priority.

    12. In line with the Negotiating Framework and previous European Council and Council conclusions, the Council underlines that Turkey needs to commit itself unequivocally to good neighbourly relations and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice. In this context, the Union urges the avoidance of any kind of threat, source of friction or actions which could damage good neighbourly relations and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Furthermore, the EU stresses again all the sovereign rights of EU Member States which include, inter alia, entering into bilateral agreements, in accordance with the EU acquis and international law, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

    13. Recalling its conclusions of 11 December 2006 and the declaration of 21 September 2005, the Council notes with deep regret that Turkey, despite repeated calls, continues refusing to fulfil its obligation of full non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement. In the absence of progress on this issue the Council will maintain its measures from 2006, which will have a continuous effect on the overall progress in the negotiations. Furthermore, Turkey has not made progress towards normalisation of its relations with the Republic of Cyprus. The Council invites the Commission to monitor closely and specifically report on all issues covered by the declaration of the European Community and its Member States of 21 September 2005 in its forthcoming annual report. On this basis, the Council will continue to closely follow and review progress made, in accordance with its conclusions of 11 December 2006. Progress is now expected without further delay.

    14.As emphasised by the Negotiating Framework, the Council also expects Turkey to actively support the ongoing negotiations aimed at a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement of the Cyprus problem within the UN framework, in accordance with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and in line with the principles on which the Union is founded. Turkey’s commitment and contribution in concrete terms to such a comprehensive settlement is crucial.

    1For Turkey the opening and provisional closing of chapters is made subject to the Council conclusions of 11 December 2006.

  • Tarpon Springs to Turkey: ‘Get out of Cyprus’

    Tarpon Springs to Turkey: ‘Get out of Cyprus’

  • EU: NEED TO RESTART TALKS WITH TURKEY, WISE MEN SAY

    EU: NEED TO RESTART TALKS WITH TURKEY, WISE MEN SAY

    euwisemen(ANSAmed) – BRUSSELS – An appeal was launched today in Brussels by the ‘wise men’ of the Independent Commission on Turkey to restart negotiations on EU membership with Ankara, which have been caught in a vicious circle for four years. The wise men – former Finnish President and Nobel prizewinner for Peace Martti Ahtisaari; fomer EU Commissioner Emma Bonino, Italy, and Hans van den Broek, Holland; former French Premier Michel Rocard; former Spanish Foreign Minister Marcelino Oreja; Austria’s former Secretary General for Foreign Affairs Albert Roahn – presented their report ‘Turkey in Europe, breaking the vicious circle’, taking the opportunity to make observations on the recent turbulent years in relations between Ankara and the EU. It all started with a ‘paradox’, said Rohan: ”Since negotiations started in 2005, the virtuous circle has turned into a vicious circle”. There are several reasons for this change of tack: the thorny issue of Cyprus, with the failed 2004 referendum over the reunification of the island following the ‘no’ vote by the Greek-Cypriots, the slowing-down of reforms by Ankara, and also ”the opposition to Turkey’s entry on the part of several European leaders and public opinion in many countries”. The positions of the leaders, said Rohan, ”are in stark contradiction to the unanimous decision to open adhesion negotiations taken by heads of State and government in December 2004. This attitude has given Turkey the impression of not being wanted, of being treated differently from other candidates. But this approach is contrary to European interests: Turkey is a strategic country for energy routes, its presence in the Caucasus, its economic strength in Central Asia, and its negotiating weight in the Middle East”. The result is that now more than half of the 35 chapters of negotiations for adhesion are blocked, either because of Cyprus’ veto, as a response to the lack of full application of the Ankara Protocol on the part of Turkey, which regulates customs relations with the 27 countries, or because of the block placed informally by other chapters. France has blocked five chapters, preferring to focus on partnership rather than integration. Austria, Germany and Holland also have political positions or public opinion overwhelmingly against Turkey’s inclusion in the EU. As for Italy, Bonino said that ”lately, for the first time, opposing positions have been taken very very firmly by the Northern League”. For this reason the former EU commissioner has called on Berlusconi to ”mediate” inside the Government so as to define a clear position ahead on the EU summit on December 9-10, during which the next steps for the adhesion talks will be defined. Emma Bonino said that the question ”of identity is an alibi for not saying anything, for not saying that they are Muslims, there are 80 million of them. I always feel like saying, what is the European identity? For me, Europe is a State of rights, division of power, democracy, open society; I do not believe that Europe is a religious project or a geographic project”. In this negative context, there are only a few signs of a change in tendency, for example the resumption of Turkish-Armenian dialogue. But the ‘wise men’ insist that ”an effort is needed, we need good news from Turkey, on its reform plans, and a greater sense of responsibility on the part of the authorities and the European media”. ‘‘Not just the credibility of Europe towards Turkey, but the international role of the EU are at stake”, concluded Ahtisaari. (ANSAmed).

    Source: 

  • Turkey’s FM sure of eventual EU membership despite critics

    Turkey’s FM sure of eventual EU membership despite critics

    Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt (L) arrives with his Turkish counterpart Ahmet Davutoglu
    Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt (L) arrives with his Turkish counterpart Ahmet Davutoglu

    STOCKHOLM — Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Saturday hit out at opponents of his country’s EU aspirations, such as France and Germany, and said Turkey’s future within the European Union was assured.

    “We have full confidence that our French, British and other colleagues will keep their commitment… There is no need for convincing, it is already sure that Turkey and the European Union will integrate in the future,” Davutoglu told reporters after talks with his EU counterparts in Stockholm.

    Turkey, which has been knocking on Europe’s door for decades, began formal EU accession talks in 2005.

    Today they are stalled by French, German and Austrian opposition as well as Ankara’s refusal to trade openly with EU member Cyprus.

    EU nation Cyprus is also opposed to membership for Turkey, which is the only nation to recognise the Turkish-Cypriot statelet in the north of the island of Cyprus.

    “The negative voices that we keep hearing from some countries in the EU just spread doubt among our citizens and impede our efforts to continue reforms,” Davutoglu wrote in an op-ed piece published in Sweden’s paper of reference Dagens Nyheter on Saturday.

    Davutoglu said Turkey had carried out reforms that were “unthinkable just a few years ago,” citing greater freedom of religion and expression, the abolishment of the death penalty and radio broadcasts in Kurdish.

    He said critics of Ankara’s EU bid were harming the country’s “silent revolution.”

    “Like us, Sweden realises that Europe can never be a strong and united entity as long as Turkey remains outside the EU,” he said.

    “The support from countries like Sweden, with their objective and encouraging attitude, is very important in the process,” the Turkish minister added.

    French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner reiterated his country’s opposition to Turkish membership.

    Asked about Swedish support for Ankara he replied “others (in the EU) are opposed”.

    “They (the Turks) are not first on the list. We have all the Western Balkans to let in (to the EU) and that is necessary,” he added.

    There was also a call on Turkey to open its ports to Cypriot ships, a main hurdle to its EU aspirations.

    France and Germany have suggested a “privileged partnership” for Turkey rather than full EU membership.

    Source:  www.google.com, 6 September 2009

  • CYPRUS- TRNC A VIGIL FOR FREEDOM

    CYPRUS- TRNC A VIGIL FOR FREEDOM

    CALLING ALL TURKS &FRIENDS OF TURKEY
    A VIGIL FOR FREEDOM OF TURKISH CYPRIOTS
    Sunday, July 19, 2009 / 6:00pm to Monday, July 20, 2009 / 12:00pm
    125px Coat of arms of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.svg
    IN FRONT OF THE TURKISH EMBASSY, DC
    2525 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C 20008

    Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA) is leading a VIGIL to respond to the extremist Cyprus Action Network of America (CANA). We will always be grateful to the Turkish Armed Forces for the Cyprus Peace Operation of July 20, 1974 which stopped the savage ethnic cleansing of the Turkish Cypriots by Greek Eoka guerrillas.

    Please contact us at 202.483.9090 or 240.888.2860 and let us know you are coming.

    What is happening to our Uygur brothers and sisters to day, has happened for years to Cypriot Turks and still happening.

    A look at the history of Cyprus, shows that it  was never a Greek island.
    1571-1878 Ottomans ruled, Turkish and Greek Cypriots lived in peace.
    1878 Britain took over the provisional administration.
    1914 Britain annexed Cyprus.Terrorist acts by Greeks started

    Statrting 1955,  the Cypriot Turks were subjected to increased repression, cruelties, intimidation by the terrorist organization EOKA. From 1955 to 1958 Turkish Cypriots were driven from the mixed villages, their houses were burnt.
    EOKA’s aim, supported both the extremist Greek Cypriots and Greece was to annihilate the Turkish Cypriots and achieve union (Enosis) with Greece.

    Turkey and the Turkish Cypriots resisted.
    1960 Republic of Cyprus was established based on the equality and partnership of the Turkish  and Greek Cypriots, with Turkey, Greece and Britain as guarantors.
    After 1960, the terrorist acts and ethnic cleansing by the Greek Cypriots, and EOKA continued and became worse.

    Nearly 30,000 Turkish Cypriots were forced from their homes and became refugees in enclaves which corresponded to 3% of the territory of Cyprus, whereas the Turkish Cypriot community previously inhabited on nearly 30% of the island. The refugees lived according to a UN statement in “veritable siege”. All necessities as well as utilities had to be brought in through the Greek Cypriot lines. The Greek Cypriots placed embargoes, control points and other restrictions on the enclaves which largely cut them off from the outside world. The UN moved in to supply a lifeline to the people in the enclaves.
    More than 100 Turkish Cypriot villages were destroyed, hundreds of Cypriot Turks were murdered, wounded, taken hostages. Many went missing.
    Greeks sent secretly 20,000 troops to the island with the aim of eventual take over of the island to realize Enosis, annexation to Greece.
    The world, especially Western Powers looked the other way.

    July 15,1974 there was a coup in Cyprus, a terrorist group took over the island’s government.
    Of the guarantor nations, Greece itself was instigating the coup, Britain refused to get involved.
    July 20, 1974, Turkey had no choice but to intervene militarily and started the Peace Operation in Cyprus.

    Around that time, US Ambassador to Cyprus, Rodger Davies and his aide were assassinated by Greek EOKA terrorists, one of the many  Greek terrorist acts against US and Turkish diplomats over the years.

    Since July 20, 1974 when the Turkish Armed Forces took over the Northern part of Cyprus and brought order to the island, there were no deaths, terrorist acts, coercion or ethnic cleansing in the island.
    Two communities live in peace, each separate with its own independent government and administration.
    In 1983 Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) was established.
    In 2004 the Turkish Cypriots overwhelmingly voted for the Annan plan (unification of the island) and the Greek Cypriots overwhelmingly rejected it.

    However an unprecedented injustice against the Cypriot Turks continues to this day.
    In 1990 Greek part of Cyprus applied for membership in the European Union(EU). After intense lobbying and extreme propaganda, Greek part of Cyprus was accepted to EU in 1997, an unlawful, illegitimate, and unwise act by the EU making a federal settlement in the island impossible.

    Also since 1974 a most unfair and damaging embargo has been applied to Turkish Cyprus, with the objective to choke the Turkish Cypriots economically.
    To this day the embargo continues with its absurd and cruel rules.

    In 1974 The Washington Post reported that  “the Greek Cypriots wanted to be left alone to kill Turkish Cypriots, and the Turkish Republic put  a stop to that”

    The  Peace Operation led by the Turkish Armed Forces in 1974, is taught throughout American law school human rights classes  as one of few military operations in the world that have resulted in increased human rights and democracy.

    Oya Bain
    oyabain@gmail.com

    Attachment(s)
    1 of 1 File(s)

    Vigil_TurkishCypriots-II.doc

  • Greek Cypriots can claim back land, EU court says

    Greek Cypriots can claim back land, EU court says

     

    Cyprus joined the EU in 2004, but negotiations on its re-unification are still ongoing (Photo: European Commission)

    ELITSA VUCHEVA

    Today @ 09:16 CET

    The EU’s top court on Tuesday (28 April) ruled in favour of a Greek Cypriot reclaiming his land in the Turkish-controlled northern part of Cyprus – a move that could open the way for more Greek Cypriots to follow the example – and potentially harden divisions on the island.

    Meletis Apostolides, who fled his land when Turkish troops invaded the northern part of Cyprus in 1974 following a Greek-inspired coup, is entitled to reclaim it back, the European Court of Justice ruled.

    Linda and David Orams, a British couple who had meanwhile purchased the land and built a villa there, should demolish it and leave, the ECJ said, backing the verdict of a Cypriot court from 2004.

    The ECJ also stressed that the UK had to accept the judgments of the Cypriot court, although application of EU law in Northern Cyprus was suspended for the purposes of Cyprus’ EU accession.

    “The recognition and enforcement of the judgements of the Cypriot court cannot be refused in the United Kingdom,” it stressed.

    “The fact that the land concerned is situated in an area over which the government does not exercise effective control … does not preclude the recognition and enforcement of those judgements in another member state,” it added.

    Mr Apostolides said he was very pleased with the ruling and that it was “what we expected.”

    “This is a difficult issue that has to be decided by the courts,” he was quoted by the BBC as saying.

    ‘A negative impact’

    Cyprus – an EU member state that joined the bloc in 2004 – has been independent since 1960 and divided since 1974. Currently Northern Cyprus is only recognised by Turkey.

    After the Turkish invasion in 1974, some 170,000 Greek Cypriots fled to the south of the island, abandoning their properties, which were then distributed among Turkish Cypriots.

    Many properties were subsequently sold on to foreigners, mainly from the UK, with the island becoming an increasingly attractive destination in recent years.

    The ECJ’s judgment is likely to incite more Greek Cypriot to claim back their land, which is in turn likely to trigger strong opposition among Turkish Cypriots.

    Disputes related to Greek and Turkish Cypriots forced to leave their properties as a result of the partition have been among the main obstacles to the reunification of the divided island.

    A spokesman for Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat said the ruling would “negatively impact” talks between Mr Talat and the island’s Greek Cypriot president, Dimitris Christofias, when it comes to future property arrangements.

    The ECJ ruling “certainly does sour the atmosphere,” Emine Erk, a northern Cypriot lawyer who had been following the case closely, told the Financial Times.

    The verdict will be perceived by Turkish Cypriots as an offence, she added.

    Meanwhile, the Greek Cypriot-run government welcomed the judgement.

    The court “has defended the property right of the citizens of the Republic of Cyprus, as EU citizens, irrespective of whether the property is located in the free or in the occupied areas,” spokesman Stefanos Stefanou was quoted by AFP news agency as saying.

    https://euobserver.com/rule-of-law/28029