Category: Russian Federation

  • Meteor is shot down over Russia!

    Meteor is shot down over Russia!

    MeteorMorgan Freeman warned us in 1998, in the film ‘Deep Impact’.

    The first ever Black American president appeared on television and said:
    “My fellow Americans…  We are facing an ‘Extinction Level Event’.”

    You probably saw in the news that a meteor exploded over Russia last
    month, injuring 1,000 people…

    From The Economist, 23rd February 2013:

    “A 10,000 tonne meteor disintegrated over Chelyabinsk, a city in Russia 
    near the border with Kazakhstan. Its break-up released 500 kilotonnes 
    of energy, equivalent to the yield of a large nuclear bomb, blowing out 
    windows and injuring more than 1,000 people. 

    In 1908 a rock the size of a city block hit the Earth’s atmosphere at 15km 
    (9 miles) a second. The explosion flattened an area the size of London. 

    But the land in question was in Siberia, so few people noticed and those 
    who did had little influence. Suppose, though, it had devastated a city in 
    Europe or North America. 

    Well, it has happened again, when a meteor crashed int he Urals on 
    February 15th, injuring more than 1,000 people. Moreover, on the same 
    day, another, larger rock called 2012 DA14 passed within 27,000km
    of 
    Earth. 

    By astronomical standards, that is a hair’s breadth. It is time to think 
    seriously about stopping such incidents by building a system that can 
    detect space rocks with sufficient warning, and then either blast them 
    or push them out of the way.” 

    What you probably don’t know, is that another meteor exploded over
    Cuba just one day later…

     

    Meteor Explosion Over Cuba One Day After Russian Event

    According to Red Orbit just one day after a spectacular meteor exploded over Russian skies, shattering windows and injuring more than a 1,200 people, Cubans were treated to a similar event, albeit on a much smaller scale.

    Many of Cuba’s citizens watched in wonderment as a small fireball soared across the early evening skies on Friday before exploding. Startled residents described seeing the bright light in the sky just seconds before a thunderous boom sent shockwaves through the air, shaking windows and walls. While the Cuban meteor explosion was similar to the Russian event, it was by far smaller and, as a result, no injuries or damages were reported.

    The Cuban event also occurred on the same day many Californians witnessed a small shooting star (meteorite) burning up in the night sky as it fell through Earth’s atmosphere over San Francisco.

    According to NBC, one couple said they were surprised by the “bright, white fireball” streaking across the night sky. Around the same time residents in northern California witnessed a meteorite blazing across the skies overhead.

    Jonathan Braidman, an instructor at the Chabot Space and Science Center in Oakland, told NBC that the California fireball was actually a small piece of asteroid. He said it is a fairly “common occurrence,” although they occur more commonly over sparsely-populated areas, perhaps where it is less likely that witnesses will observe them.

    Several anonymous reports from citizens in Cuba said the explosion was impressive. One woman told state TV news agency CubaSi that her “home shook completely” and that she “never heard such a strange thing.”

    It is not clear yet if the Cuban explosion was indeed from a meteor. Because Cuba lies so closely to the shores of southern Florida, it seems a major meteor streaking across the skies would have likely been spotted there as well, to which no reports have yet to surface. And a California-based telescope monitoring that specific area of sky had not picked up any unusual activity.

    Scientists say that small meteorites hit the Earth several times per year, but larger events like the one over Russia are much rarer.

    Professor Edwin Bergin, of the University of Michigan’s Astronomy department, told redOrbit on Friday that meteors like the Russian one “occur every 10 to 30 years or so.” And even larger ones, those larger than a half-mile wide, “occur once or twice every million years.”

    As for the Russian event, a local scientist today recovered the first fragments of the giant meteor on the edge of a giant hole in a frozen lake near Chelyabinsk after a sizeable chunk of the exploded meteor came crashing down, according to RIA Novosti news agency.

    Russian officials had searched the lake on Friday and Saturday but had turned up no results and suggested the hole may not have actually been caused by a meteor fragment.

    However, Mikhail Udovinko, who is studying metallurgy at a local university, said he had found a small stone near the edge of the hole at the lake, and believes it is part of Friday’s meteor. He said that the stone responds to magnetism and has some weak radioactive properties.

    Paul Abell, a scientist at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, has compiled new data for the meteor strike and said it was traveling at 46,000 mph when it hit the Earth’s atmosphere. Earlier reports placed the top speed at around 33,000 mph.

    Abell said, according to ABC News, the meteor exploded in the atmosphere because its composition is stony, rather than metallic. The famous Tunguska asteroid that exploded over Siberia in 1908 was also stony, which is why it didn’t impact the Earth.

    Metallic meteors are more likely to impact earth, leaving huge craters, much like a famous one found in Arizona.

    More astonishing, was the fact that the Russian, Cuban and Californian events occurred on, or around, the same day that the 2012 DA14 asteroid made a historic close approach of Earth, flying by at nearly 17,000 miles overhead, closer than our own geosynchronous satellites, which typically orbit us at 22,000 miles.

    But despite the occurrences coming on the same day as the 2012 DA14 flyby, experts said that none of the meteor events are associated with that asteroid.

    However, these events are causing some level of concern about what else may be out there lurking in the dark and whether the planet can be protected from future events– ones that could possibly be ten, or even a hundred, times more destructive than the Russian event.

    Members of The United Nations, The White House, and even Congress have all asked to be briefed on these events, Abell said.

    One ambitious plan to take out asteroids and large meteors before they take us out has already been proposed by two California scientists on Friday as well.

    The proposed system, called DE-STAR, would be designed to shift the orbit of large asteroids, possibly deflecting them away from the Earth. This system is designed to utilize the energy of the Sun, converting it into an array of lasers that can also destroy, or evaporate comets and meteors.

    Another system is already in the works.

    Planetary Resources, a company that has lofty ambitions to mine asteroids and meteors in space, recently announced that its Arkyd-100 Series spacecraft would assist in the assessment of potentially hazardous asteroids that could impact Earth.

  • Russia and Turkey open Samsun-Caucasus train ferry – exclusive interview

    Russia and Turkey open Samsun-Caucasus train ferry – exclusive interview

    TURKEY SPAIN ALVAREZ

    Binala Yildirim

    Photo: EPA

    The opening ceremony of the Samsun-Caucasus train ferry, which links the North of the country to the South of Russia, will be held on February 19 in the Turkish city of Samsun. This project will give a new dimension to the two country’s bilateral relations, Turkey’s Minister of Transport Binala Yildirim stated in an exclusive interview with the Voice of Russia.

    The Samsun-Caucasus will be the shortest transport corridor between the countries.

    Its connection to the internal areas of the country will be established in the Russian territory.

    Northern and Southern corridors in the territory of Turkey will also be connected to provide a combined and fully integrated transportation network.

    Meanwhile, Russia will be able to establish transport links with the Mediterranean region and the Middle East; and Turkey – with Turkic states (former Soviet republics) and Siberia.

    The Minister pointed out that there was road, air, railway and sea communication between Russia and Turkey.

    As for relations between the two countries as a whole, they continue to develop in a friendly vein, in the framework of mutual respect, Binala Yildirim is sure.

    He expressed hope that in 5-10 years bilateral trade would increase three times and would amount to 100 billion dollars.

    via Russia and Turkey open Samsun-Caucasus train ferry – exclusive interview: Voice of Russia.

  • Leviathan gas sales to Turkey worth $3-4b a year

    Leviathan gas sales to Turkey worth $3-4b a year

    Leviathan is not big enough for exports by pipeline and LNG, and this could harm Woodside’s plans to build an LNG facility.

    17 February 13 17:43, Amiram Barkat and Hillel Koren

    A natural gas export contract with Turkey could generate $3-4 billion revenue a year for the Leviathan partners, Noble Energy Inc. (NYSE: NBL), Delek Group Ltd. (TASE: DLEKG), and Ratio Oil Exploration (1992) LP (TASE:RATI.L), according to an analysis of market prices and the quantities of gas under discussion by the parties. Turkey currently pays $11-16 per million BTU for natural gas it buys via pipeline, depending on the contracts with natural gas suppliers.

    Turkish daily “Sunday’s Zaman” reports that Turkey’s main gas supplier, Russia, which supplies 55% of the country’s gas, charges $400 million per billion cubic meters, or $11 per million BTU. Azerbaijan, which supplies 10% of the country’s gas, charges $300 million per billion cubic meters, and Iran, which supplies 25% of the country’s gas, charges $505million per billion cubic meters. Turkish complaints about the high price of Iranian gas resulted in the opening of arbitration proceeding in March 2012. Nonetheless, Turkey increased its gas purchases from Iran by 10%, compared with 2011, to 8 BCM, at a cost of over $4 billion.

    Talks between Turkish companies and the Leviathan partners mention gas deliveries equal to Turkey’s imports from Iran.

    Energy analysts are currently skeptical about a deal, saying that there is nothing to price at this time, and that Egyptian gas affair demonstrates the geopolitical risks of any gas contract. “If the gas flow stops after two years, how will that affect the return on investment and yields? After all, no one can guarantee such large gas sales,” a market source says.

    Noble Energy executives have said in the past that any deal with Turkey would require changes in the diplomatic landscape. In addition, any large gas deal with Turkey could have ramifications on liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plans and on plans by Australia’s Woodside Petroleum Ltd. (ASX: WPL) to become a partner in Leviathan for the purpose of building such a facility.

    The size of gas discovery at Leviathan and other fields are not big enough for simultaneous exports by pipeline and LNG, even assuming that the Tzemach Committee does not reduce its gas export recommendations, following disappointing results from wells drilled after the report was published.

    Market sources believe that that Leviathan partners will soon announce an update on the discovery. Source close to the matter are optimistic about an upward revision from the current estimate of 17 trillion cubic feet of gas. The Leviathan 4 verification well, begun in mid-November, will take four months to complete. The well is targeting strata at a depth of 5,300 meters, including 1,600 meters water depth. The well will later serve as the gas production rig as part of Leviathan’s development plan.

    Published by Globes [online], Israel business news – www.globes-online.com – on February 17, 2013

    © Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd. 2013

    via Leviathan gas sales to Turkey worth $3-4b a year – Globes.

  • Turkey wants more Russian gas

    Turkey wants more Russian gas

    4highres_00000401589303

    Photo: EPA

    Russia and Turkey are ready to begin talks about an increase in Russian export gas supplies. For the time being, under discussion are additional 3 billion cubic metres of gas annually. However, experts are sure that the consumption of fuel in Turkey as well as the demand for Russian gas will grow in the country in the coming few years.

    Turkey has limited reserves of natural gas. Today Turkey is spending billions of dollars on prospecting for new gas deposits in the south-east of the country and in the Black Sea. 17 new oil and gas deposits have already been discovered. Some experts say that there are big reserves of shale hydrocarbons in Turkey. In any case, Turkey can effectively handle only the natural gas it imports. In compliance with the Russian-Turkish contract, the Russian gas giant Gazprom supplies nearly 26 billion cubic metres of gas to Turkey annually. In the future Turkey would like to receive from 29 to 30 cubic metres of gas per year. Gas consumption in the country is growing. Russian fuel is transported to Turkey through the Western Corridor and the Blue Stream gas pipelines. If Turkey wants, their capacity could be increased, Head of the Analytical Research Department at the URALSIB Company Alexander Golovtsov says.

    “Turkey’s population is growing. Therefore, gas consumption in the country will grow too. Hence, unless the global situation with Iran is settled and torrential gas flows start coming from it to Turkey, the demand for Russian gas will grow, and with the existing growth rates another 5 years will be needed to fill the Blue Stream gas pipeline with gas.”

    Russia is not the only supplier of natural gas to Turkey, the partner of the consulting RusEnergy Company Mikhail Krutikhin says.

    “Another stage of the gas project leading to Azerbaijan will be launched by 2018, and the volume of the pumped Azeri gas to Turkey will increase as well. Besides, Turkey plans to receive gas from Iraqi Kurdistan, in addition to the liquefied natural gas (LNG). Although Russia is Turkey’s very important partner, it is not its only partner.”

    Thus, Turkey is trying to receive the maximum benefit from its geographic position – between the countries involved in gas extraction. Besides, Turkey holds a monopoly on the transit of natural gas because it has established its control over the Black Sea’s outlet to the Mediterranean Sea, Mikhail Krutikhin said.

    “Turkey does not let large gas carriers to enter the Black Sea. Thus, the capacity of the Bosporus Strait and the Dardanelles hamper Ukraine’s plans to build a terminal for the import of liquefied natural gas.”

    In fact, Russia and Turkey have similar views regarding gas issues. Russia’s Gazprom is seeking to diversify its export flows and to sell its gas to various countries. The Turkish market, which is more dynamic than the European market, remains more attractive. And as regards Turkey, it is trying to develop its own system of gas import, buying gas from numerous buyers – a little at a time, aiming to become dependent on nobody. But even with the existing arrangement, Russian gas pipelines remain the most effective mechanism.

    via Turkey wants more Russian gas: Voice of Russia.

  • Turkey looking at EU alternative

    Turkey looking at EU alternative

    Editor’s Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports.

    WASHINGTON – Turkey is no closer to membership in the European Union now than when it first applied in 1959 and instead it is looking eastward to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization out of total exasperation, according to a report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

    The SCO is comprised of Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

    Turkey, which is a long-standing member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, still holds out faint hope of joining the E.U.

    The reality, however, is that fellow NATO members Germany, France and Greece have opposed Ankara’s membership, even though Turkey can ship its products duty-free to E.U. nations under a prior arrangement but people sending the products still need to file for a visa.

    Turkey hopes to allow its citizens to enter into E.U. countries under the Schengen Treaty, which allows E.U. members to travel among the E.U. member countries without a visa.

    “There is one issue that has been on top of our agenda still pending to be resolved,” said Egemen Bagis, Turkey’s Minister for E.U. relations, “the Schengen visa preventing the free travel of Turkish citizens.”

    “It is not fair,” he said. “Turkey is the only E.U. candidate country, whose citizens are still subject to visas. Turkey is the only country that had formed a Customs Union with the E.U. without becoming a member. The products of Turkish businessmen can freely flow into the Union, but the owners of those products cannot freely travel.”

    Bagis said that Turkey still seeks membership. However, the E. U. “actually wants to forget us. We are not the ones that are undecided – the European Union is. Whereas, if they would just reveal their true intentions to us, we would be at ease. We could just look after our own business and go our own way. The European Union needs to stop stalling us.”

    Turkey’s total exasperation recently was exhibited by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

    “I told Russian President (Vladimir) Putin, ‘You should include us in the Shanghai Five and we will say farewell to the European Union.’”

    Separately, Erdogen let his feelings be known that the SCO “is better and more powerful, and we have common values with them. We told them ‘if you say come, we will.’ Pakistan wants to join, as does India. They have also made requests. We could all join together. In terms of population and markets, the organization significantly surpasses the European Union in every way.”

    Some observers believe Erdogan is using the SCO as leverage to get into the E.U. Others aren’t so sure. They point to the fact that Erdogan has made such statements in the past.

    Given the E.U.’s economic problems, Erdogan may be looking to the developing markets such as China and India for future opportunities. Turkey’s membership would especially be an asset to China and Russia, which would have greater access to Western technology as a result of Turkey being a NATO member.

    For Turkey, this arrangement also would be of political benefit since it would be able to reassert its influence in a fast-expanding market of Central and East Asian countries, where Turkey under the Ottoman Empire asserted great influence.

    Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND.

    For the complete report and full immediate access to Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, subscribe now.

    via Turkey looking at EU alternative.

  • Turkey Turning to Coal to Reduce Gazprom Dependence

    Turkey Turning to Coal to Reduce Gazprom Dependence

    LONDON — Worried about dependence on pricier gas from Iran and Russia, Turkey is turning to its own coal.

    The country signed a deal with a United Arab Emirates company that will boost its coal-fired power capacity 67 percent.

    Turkey’s biggest gas supplier is Gazprom, which accounts for about half of imports, but it is long-term supply from Iran that could pose the biggest concerns.

    Turkey might not be able to continue to ignore further tightening of international sanctions aimed at curtailing the Iran’s nuclear program.

    Ankara signed a $12 billion deal with TAQA to mine lignite coal and by 2020 build new power plants capable of generating up to 8,000 megawatts.

    “The TAQA deal is first and foremost motivated by the need to refurbish and build new coal-fired power plants, but the move to develop coal stems from a general concern that Turkey is hugely dependent on others for its energy needs,” said Andrew Neff, a senior analyst for IHS Energy.

    The European Association for Coal and Lignite, or Euracoal, said Turkey imports more than 70 percent of its primary energy needs. Most of the 30 million tons of hard coal it annually uses is supplied by Russia, Colombia, the United States and South Africa, according to Euracoal.

    Natural gas imports, mainly from Russia, Iran, and Azerbaijan, meet about 45 percent of Turkey’s demand for heat and power, according to the IEA, a dependency that comes with frequent price disputes with suppliers.

    In another sign that Turkey’s policymakers are keen to reduce dependence on gas imports, the government said in December that it would not take part in Russia’s South Stream gas pipeline project.

    The pipeline was designed to pump more than 60 billion cubic meters, almost twice Turkey’s annual gas demand, via the Black Sea into southern Europe. High gas prices, which make gas-fired power generation less attractive than coal, as well as concerns over gas-import dependence, have been shared by several European countries.

    Consuming countries complain that Gazprom charges too much for its gas and that its long-term supply contracts are too inflexible. The European Union opened an antitrust case against Gazprom last year, sparking a political feud with Moscow.

    In Germany, cheap coal prices have led to strong growth in coal-fired power generation.

    In Poland, which relies heavily on Russian gas supplies but is also a big user of the more-polluting lignite that Turkey mines, the government is eying potentially large domestic supplies of unconventional natural gas sources, such as shale gas.

    Ukraine said last month that it had secured a $3.6 billion loan from China that will switch power plants from imported natural gas to gasified coal.

    Despite Turkey’s long-term aim of becoming less reliant on imports, its demand for Russian gas in the short term will likely rise to meet booming demand, Neff said.

    via Turkey Turning to Coal to Reduce Gazprom Dependence | Business | The Moscow Times.