Category: Southern Caucasus

  • PIRATES OF THE BLACK SEA

    PIRATES OF THE BLACK SEA

    Nezavisimaya Gazeta
    September 1, 2009

    Backed by Russia, Abkhazia promises to seize Georgian ships
    Author: Yuri Simonjan
    RUSSIA MIGHT FIND ITSELF DRAGGED INTO A CONFLICT BETWEEN
    TBILISI AND SUKHUMI AGAIN

    Backed by Russia, Abkhazia is prepared to challenge Georgia in the
    Black Sea. “They leave us no choice. We will seize Georgian
    ships,” Abkhazian Foreign Minister Sergei Shamba said. Georgia had
    seized and arrested several ships on the run to and from Abkhazia
    last month.
         Tbilisi in its turn only emphasized the resolve to board and
    detain all vessels entering territorial waters of Georgia,
    including the Abkhazian part, without permit.
         Sukhumi turned to Moscow and immediately obtained its promise
    of assistance. Ships navigating territorial waters of Abkhazia
    will be protected by Russian and Abkhazians border guards. “All
    attention was focused on the Abkhazian-Georgian land border. The
    situation at sea requires attention too,” Shamba announced.
         The Georgian Coast Guard detained 23 ships for “violation of
    the entry regulations” this year and nearly 70 over the last four
    years. The ships are almost always Turkish, Ukrainian, Russian,
    and Greek.
         “Seizing ships in neutral waters, Georgia commits acts of
    piracy. Our appeals to the UN and EU remain unanswered which only
    encourages Georgia. Tbilisi must have forgotten that Georgian
    ships pass us by on the way to Ukrainian, Bulgaria, and Greece and
    that we can respond in kind,” Shamba said.
         The minister said that the situation had been more or less
    tolerable until US Vice President Josef Biden’s visit to Georgia
    this spring. “The Georgian authorities must have been given
    assurances of some sort,” Shamba assumed. He announced that
    Georgia’s actions constitute a violation of the settlement
    agreement reached with the European Union’s help.
         Official Tbilisi pays no heed to Sukhumi’s protestations. It
    maintains that sailing into Abkhazian ports without authorization
    from the central government of Georgia is a violation that will
    not be tolerated.
         Georgian Deputy Foreign Minister David Dzhalagania said at
    the press conference this Monday that participation of Russia
    would be a height of cynicism. He added that Russia had already
    assaulted Georgia once.
         “Russia’s attempts to protect trespassers in the Georgian
    territorial waters will be appraised and treated as piracy.
    Freight traffic to Abkhazia without Tbilisi’s permit is a gross
    violation of the Georgian legislation,” State Minister for
    Reintegration Temur Yakobashvili said.
         Military expert Irakly Sesiashvili said that Tbilisi was
    trying to bite more than it could possibly chew. Attempts to
    prevent Russian ships from entering the local waters will lead to
    a dangerous confrontation or Georgia will have to cry uncle.
    Sesiashvili said the international community alone could settle
    the issue.

  • “PM Erdogan should keep the words he said in Azerbaijan”

    “PM Erdogan should keep the words he said in Azerbaijan”

     

     
     

    [ 01 Sep 2009 16:36 ]
    Ankara. Mayis Alizadeh – APA. Deputy Chairman of Turkey’s leading opposition party – Republic People’s Party, former officer of Turkish Foreign Ministry, former ambassador of Turkey to Germany, Denmark and NATO, MP Onur Oymen interviewed by APA’s Turkey bureau

    -Some days ago you said there will be improvements in Turkey-Armenia relations. You were right. How do you assess the recent situation?

    -We were confused, because Prime Minister Erdogan promised in May in Azerbaijani parliament that Turkey-Armenia relations will not be normalized unless the occupation by Armenia ends. There is no information that Armenia will end the occupation – they do not step back. How will the relations be normalized under these circumstances? We can not approve it. We must think about Turkey-Azerbaijan relations. Azerbaijan is our brother. The problems worrying Azerbaijan will worry us, too. That’s why, we consider that Turkey should not normalize the relations with Armenia, unless Armenia releases Azerbaijani territories and one million Azerbaijanis return home.

    -Head of Turkish Foreign Ministry’s office and his assistant visited Azerbaijan last week. As far as we know Turkish diplomats assured Baku that Azerbaijan’s interests will not be damaged.

    -They had said it earlier and noted that they informed Ilham Aliyev about the negotiations held in Switzerland. Later, serious protests came from Azerbaijan. Does it damage Azerbaijan, if relations are established before Armenians release Azerbaijani territories?

    -It seems that these steps are taken to pave the way for Serzh Sargsyan’s arrival in Turkey. Doesn’t this atmosphere show this?

    -Sargsyan may come to Turkey by plane. Abdullah Gul also left for Yerevan by plane. They exert pressure on Turkey under the pretext of the match. “I will not come, if do not reopen the borders.” No one will mourn in Turkey, if Sargsyan does not come to watch the match. We can not change our targets and policy only because he will come to watch the match. Turkey should demonstrate a decisive position.

    The Prime Minister promised during his visit to Azerbaijan that the borders will not be opened until the solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

    – Sargsyan is one of the separatists who occupied Nagorno Karabakh. Sargsyan shows Karabakh Armenians as soon as Turkey and Azerbaijan pressure upon Armenia.

    – We understand these games very well. Is there any sign of Armenia’s willingness to withdraw from Karabakh lands?

    – No.

    – Why we have to step back? Why we closed the borders? We closed borders because Armenia occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijani lands. Why we have to re-open the borders while the lands were not liberated so far?

    – As a veteran diplomat and politician, you know the Russian influence on Armenia. What do you think, can the West to win Armenia making these steps over Turkey?

    – Russia has own interests and goals as every country has. We want normal relations with Russia, but the countries have to be able to protect their interests and targets. Otherwise they can’t win anyone’s trust. If the Prime Minister promised something on behalf of his country, he must not leave it later. I am concerning about our Azerbaijani brothers. The re-opening of the borders will hurt them. We didn’t hear Azerbaijan’s reaction yet. It will be better to know thoughts of Azerbaijani president about the last developments. In our opinion, Turkey must not step back in its policy.

    – Probably you will express your opinion during the discussion on the protocols agreed between the governments of Turkey and Armenia at the Turkish parliament.

    – Of course. But the ruling party has a majority in the parliament and it has a power to pass any law there. Unfortunately we have no enough power to prevent it. But the Turkish people will show necessary reaction. The government should report to the people about its actions.

  • “Turkish-Armenian agreements do not include any condition about Nagorno Karabakh”

    “Turkish-Armenian agreements do not include any condition about Nagorno Karabakh”

     

     
     

    [ 01 Sep 2009 17:07 ]
    Baku – APA. “Armenia moves closer to the opportunity for solution of problems with Turkey”, said Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan in an annual meeting with the staff members of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and ambassadors, APA reports quoting News Armenia.

    He said the international community had more information and more obligations on this issue. “We worked hard to normalize our relations with the neighboring country. I consider that the coherent protocols enable us to do that”.

    Sargsyan said the Turkish-Armenian agreements did not include any condition about Nagorno Karabakh and related issues. “The history of Armenia-Turkey relations should be discussed not by the historians, but by the subcommittees of the intergovernmental commission”.

    Sargsyan said for the first time in the history of Armenia the signing of important international document would be accompanied by the public debates. “I prefer nationwide activity in this issue. You have to play active role in the public debates in Armenia and Diaspora and to make clear all positive and problematic components of the protocols”.

  • West Hails Turkish-Armenian Statement

    West Hails Turkish-Armenian Statement

    2B732071 87D2 4987 8776 3E7A47C07037 w393 s

    Turkey – US President Barack Obama (R) meets with the foreign ministers of Armenia, Turkey and Switzerland in Istanbul, 06Apr2009

    01.09.2009

    The United States and the European Union have welcomed the latest agreement announced by Armenia and Turkey and urged the two estranged neighbors to promptly complete the normalization of their relations.

    “The United States warmly welcomes the joint statement made today by Turkey and Armenia, with Swiss participation, outlining further steps in the normalization of their bilateral relations,” U.S. State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said late Monday.

     

    “It has long been and remains the position of the United States that normalization should take place without preconditions and within a reasonable timeframe,” he said. “We urge Armenia and Turkey to proceed expeditiously, according to the agreed framework as described in today’s statement.”

     

    The Turkish-Armenian statement, which set concrete time frames for the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two states and reopening of their border, also drew strong praise from the EU on Tuesday. Javier Solana, the bloc’s foreign and security policy chief, called it a “crucial step towards normalization of bilateral relations.”

     

    “I commend the  courage and vision of both sides to move forward with this historic process,” Solana said in a statement. “I hope the two protocols can be signed, ratified, and implemented in the near term.”

     

    The European Commission attaches high importance to a rapid and steady implementation of the protocols on the establishment of diplomatic relations and on the development of bilateral relations,” read a separate statement by Benita Ferrero-Waldner and Olli Rehn, the EU commissioners for external relations and enlargement respectively. “This agreement should contribute to peace and stability in the South Caucasus.”

     

    Both the EU and the U.S. have been highly supportive of the unprecedented Turkish-Armenian rapprochement that gained momentum with Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s historic September 2008 visit to Yerevan. Washington is understood to have also been involved in fence-mending negotiations held by Turkish and Armenian diplomats over the past year. U.S. President Barack Obama personally encouraged Ankara and Yerevan to bring the process to a successful conclusion when he visited Turkey in April.

     

    https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1812260.html

  • Stalin Planned to Annex Parts of Iran, Turkey and China Using Molotov-Ribbentrop ‘Model,’ Azerbaijani Scholar Says

    Stalin Planned to Annex Parts of Iran, Turkey and China Using Molotov-Ribbentrop ‘Model,’ Azerbaijani Scholar Says

    Paul Goble

    Vienna, August 31 – Stalin viewed the secret protocols of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact which allowed Moscow to seize the Baltic countries, Bessarabia, and part of Poland as “a model” for the subsequent annexation of portions of Iran, Turkey and China, an Azerbaijani scholar has suggested.
    And while the Soviet dictator did not succeed in doing so in any of these cases, largely because of Stalin’s dependence on the West after Hitler invaded his former ally in June 1941 and because of Western opposition in each, the existence of these plans demolishes the arguments of those who insist that the pact was only a defensive rather than also an offensive accord.
    In an analysis of recent research on these questions posted on the 1news.az site over the weekend, Jeyhun Najafov calls attention to an aspect of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact that has attracted little attention during this year’s debate on the 70th anniversary of the accord between Hitler and Stalin (1news.az/analytics/20090829104314684.html).
    As almost all sides in that debate concede, the secret protocol attached to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact put part of Poland, Finland, Bessarabia, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in Moscow’s sphere of influence, opening the way for the Soviet Union to expand it borders to the West.
    Stalin’s supporters argue that this was a defensive maneuver, designed to protect the Soviet Union from what the Soviet dictator assumed would be an eventual German attack on the USSR, while critics of Stalin argue that the Soviet agreement with the Nazis was simply about the territorial aggrandizement of Stalin’s empire.
    Research conducted by Dzhakhangir Nadzhafov, a scholar at the Moscow Institute of General History, clearly shows that Stalin’s critics have the better argument, given that documents he published in Moscow’s “Voprosy istorii” show that Stalin planned to use the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact as “a model” for annexing other neighboring regions.
    Not surprisingly, Nadzhafov focused on Stalin’s plans to annex the northern regions of Iran, the population of which was and remains predominantly ethnically Azerbaijani, but he also explored the Soviet dictator’s plans to annex the Xinjiang Region of China and some of the eastern districts of Turkey.
    In 1941, Nadzhafov wrote, Mirdzhafar Bagirov, the Communist Party boss of Azerbaijan, invoking Stalin, said that “in Iran it is necessary to undertake the tactic and strategy of the model of uniting Polish territories to Ukraine and Belorussia,” an indication that Moscow’s plans for annexing portions of Iran were “practically ready.”
    Additional evidence of the way in which Stalin viewed the secret protocols as a model concerns Xinjiang and the eastern portions of Turkey, Nadzhafov pointed out. “The Politburo planned to annex completely the Turkish districts of Kars, Ardahan and part of Avdina and divide the 26,500 square kilometers of territory between Armenia and Georgia.
    Moscow had also defined the exact dimension of the territory of Iran that would be united with the Azerbaijan SSR, so all three of the republics of the South Caucasus would have expanded significantly, Armenia by 80 percent, Georgia by eight percent, and Azerbaijan more than doubled.
    The Politburo was so committed to these territorial transfers and so certain that it they would take place that it had the foreign ministry work up the necessary documents and had decided on both the exact dates – the Iranian provinces were to be absorbed on November 7, 1941 – and the names of the Communist officials who would be assigned to these places.
    Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941 put all these plans on hold. Stalin needed Western assistance, and much of it flowed through Iran. As a result, the British insisted that Moscow recognize the territorial integrity of that country, something the Soviet Union did in a trilateral agreement with the US and the United Kingdom in January 1942.
    But as Soviet forces moved westward and victory over Hitler seemed assumed, Moscow appears to have taken up the Southern Azerbaijan project once again, not only because many ethnic Azerbaijanis on both sides of the border were interested but because of the growing importance of oil, large amounts of which were located in this region.
    Toward that end, the Soviets created the Democratic Republic of Southern Azerbaijan, a regime backed by the present of Red Army troops. But after the end of World War II, those troops were withdrawn, and the Soviet-backed puppet government of Southern Azerbaijan collapsed.
    As Najafov noted in his article on Saturday, “certain [Azerbaijani] scholars connect the fall of the Democratic Republic of Southern Azerbaijan with what they see as a manifestation of the negative attitude toward Azerbaijan by Stalin, Beria, Mikoyan” and other Soviet leaders. But, the journalist says, such conclusions “do not have any basis in fact.”
    Instead, he writes, “the Western powers considered that Stalin and the Soviet leadership had received an enormous zone of influence in Europe and therefore must not be permitted in any way to expand into Central Asia.” Indeed, Najafov argues, “the West was united on this question.”
    “For Azerbaijanis,” he says, Southern Azerbaijan “was a question of the future of the nation. For the USSR, Iranian Azerbaijan was about the annexation of new territories, but for the West this was the expansion of communism.” And the West, possibly according to some accounts using the threat of a nuclear attack against the USSR, was not prepared to tolerate that.
    But however that may be – and this question is still a matter of dispute – the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact not only was the product of a far more aggressive Soviet policy than its defenders want to admit but also cast a larger and more ugly shadow than even the victims and opponents of the Hitler-Stalin accord had thought.

    http://windowoneurasia.blogspot.com/2009/08/window-on-eurasia-stalin-planned-to.html

  • Russia to stop Georgian border guards from detaining ships in ‘Abkhaz waters’

    Russia to stop Georgian border guards from detaining ships in ‘Abkhaz waters’

    RIA-Novosti

    Moscow, 28 August: The Russian FSB (Federal Security Service) Coastguard, together with the Abkhaz border guards, will ensure the security of vessels entering Abkhaz territorial waters against their detention by Georgia. In part this is being done as part of the preparations for the 2014 Olympic Games in Sochi, the head of the border guard department – deputy head of the Russian FSB Border Guard Service, Lt-Gen Yevgeniy Inchin, told RIA Novosti on Friday (28 August).

    Georgia views Abkhazia as part of its territory and regards the delivery of cargo to Abkhazia by sea without Tbilisi’s permission as breach of the country’s legislation. Since the start of 2009 Georgia’s coastguard has detained 23 vessels in Abkhaz waters for various violations. Four of them were detained for the violation of the rules for entering waters of “occupied territories”.

    “At sea they are quite aggressive. Georgia regards entry into Abkhazia’s territorial waters as basis for taking various measures against vessels sailing under third countries’ flags, including measures of judicial nature,” said Inchin.

    In his words, the agreement between the Russian Federation and Abkhazia on border protection envisages taking joint action to ensure security in Abkhazia’s territorial waters.

    Asked whether Russian FSB’s coastguard will deprive the Georgian side of the ability to detain vessels sailing to and from Abkhazia Inchin said: “The FSB’s border guard department for Abkhazia has a group of boats which will be addressing this task, that is to say ensuring the untouchability (of vessels).”

    “Trust me, they will be doing this in an efficient and productive manner, as the ‘factor of Sochi’ and the forthcoming Olympic Games is in this case the determining one. All of this will happen, in the near future. At present we need to create all the conditions for this,” the FSB general said.

    Abkhaz border guards too will have border guard boats. They will be addressing the tasks relating to ensuring security in the water zone together with their colleagues from Russia, he added.

    “The tasks aren’t easy, but we will fulfil them,” he said. (Passage omitted: RIA recalls recent detention)

    (Interfax news agency quoted the head of the border guard squad of Abkhazia’s state security service, Zurab Marghania, as saying: “At present the Russian and Abkhaz border services are drawing up a joint action plan for the prevention of the Georgian border guards’ pirate-like actions in the Black Sea.”)