Category: Southern Caucasus

  • UN GA Session: Statement of Elmar Mammadyarov, Minister of  Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan

    UN GA Session: Statement of Elmar Mammadyarov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan

    General Debate of the 64th Session (2009)

    Azerbaijan
    H.E. Elmar Maharram oglu Mammadyarov, Minister for Foreign Affairs

    25 September 2009

    Statement summaryELMAR MAMMADYAROV, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan, said that, unfortunately, the unlawful use of force had still not been removed from the context of international relations.  Today, civilian populations were still suffering from the manifest failure of individual States to fulfil their most basic responsibilities.  Governments failing to obey the rules of international conduct inevitably infringed upon individual liberties and freedoms at home, thus undermining democratic development.  The most vivid example of misconduct against the norms and principles of international law was the still unresolved Nagorny Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

    As a result of Armenia’s aggression, almost one fifth of Azerbaijan’s territory had been occupied and some 1 million Azerbaijanis had become refugees and internally displaced persons, he said.  Four Security Council resolutions recognized Nagorny Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, and called for the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of the occupying forces.  General Assembly resolution 62/243 expressed support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, and the advocated a step-by-step approach to settling the conflict.

    He said a number of important steps must be taken, starting with the withdrawal of Armenian forces from all occupied territories and the return of internally displaced persons to their homes.  That would pave the way for durable peace and stability in the region, which would be conducive to the elaboration of the legal status of Nagorny Karabakh within Azerbaijan, taking due account of the wishes of both Azeri and Armenian communities of the region.  Armenia’s acceptance of the step-by-step approach based on the decisions reflected in the Joint Declaration signed in Moscow in 2008 by the Presidents of Azerbaijan, Armenia and the Russian Federation was a positive sign.

    Azerbaijan had minimized the impact of the global economic downturn and managed to sustain its growth, he said, adding that, since 2003, the poverty rate had dropped from 44 to 13 per cent.   The country’s modern energy infrastructure, coupled with vast energy resources, had transformed Azerbaijan into an energy hub of international importance and contributed to the development of neighbouring States.  Today was a time of heightened religious and ethnic awareness, which in certain instances was maliciously exploited to fuel conflicts on ethnic, religious or cultural grounds.  Azerbaijan supported fully the Secretary-General’s recommendations to remove hate messages, distortions, prejudice and negative bias from educational media and to ensure basic knowledge and understanding of the world’s main cultures and religions.  Azerbaijan had been among the first countries to join the Alliance of Civilizations initiative of Turkey and Spain.


    Source: GA/10863

    PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN
    TO THE UNITED NATIONS
    K66 United Nations Pl»™, Suite 5<M, New York, N,Y. 10017 TYI.: (212)171-2559 Fax: (212)371-2784
    Check against delivery
    Statement
    by H.E. Mr. Elmar Mammadyarov
    Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan
    General Debates
    of the 64th session of the United Nations General Assembly
    25 September 2009, New York
    Excellencies,
    Ladies and gentlemen,
    I would like to join the previous speakers and congratulate H.E. Mr. Ali Abdussalam
    Treki of Libya on his election to the post of the President of the 64th session of the
    United Nations General Assembly and wish him every success, and I thank his
    predecessor Mr. Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann for his work.
    I also express my profound respect and appreciation to the Secretary-General of the
    United Nations H.E. Mr. Ban Ki-moon for his leadership in mobilizing the
    international community to make our world a better place to live.
    Mr. President,
    We all recognise that the security of every State in the world can be better promoted
    and ensured with a multilateral security system. This paradigm was a principal reason
    behind creation of the collective security system with the United Nations
    Organization at its core.
    Yet, after more than 60 years since the United Nations was founded, the question still
    remains valid whether the contemporary international security architecture is
    effectively and timely addressing the multifaceted and interconnected challenges and
    threats confronting our today’s world?
    -1-
    The global character of today’s challenges and threats makes the geographic distance
    irrelevant in security policy formulation, since the threats as we know them today
    transcend the national frontiers and the whole continents. The indirect repercussions
    of the threats may be as much devastating and costly as the direct impact. The
    interconnected and intertwined nature of the threats requires reconsidering the very
    concept of security in broader terms that is not confined to the traditional military
    aspect of security, but comprises also political, economic, energy, cultural,
    information and other dimensions.
    The security of each State, and more broadly, the international peace and security will
    depend on whether States follow the norms and principles of international law and
    use them as a guiding tool for shaping their foreign and security policies. Following
    common set of norms and rules on the international arena contributes to the
    transparency and predictability of State behaviour and hence consolidates
    international peace and security.
    Unfortunately, unlawful use of force is still not removed from the context of
    international relations. Today civilian populations are still suffering in many places
    around the world due to the manifest failure of individual States to fulfil their most
    basic and compelling responsibilities. Armed conflicts, military aggression and
    foreign occupation involving the most serious international crimes are only a few
    vivid examples from our recent history of the bitter consequences of noncompliance
    by individual States with the norms and principles of international law. Governments
    failing to obey the rules of international conduct will inevitably infringe upon the
    individual liberties and freedoms at home, thus undermining the democratic
    development.
    Ladies and gentlemen,
    The most vivid example of misconduct of the norms and principles of international
    law is almost two decades long and still unresolved Armenian-Azerbaijan Nagorno-
    Karabakh conflict which also stands out as a major threat to international and
    regional peace and security. As a result of the aggression conducted by Armenia
    almost one-fifth of the territory of Azerbaijan has been occupied, approximately 1
    million ethnically cleansed Azerbaijani population has become internally displaced
    and refugees, thousands of Azerbaijani historical-cultural heritage devastated and
    looted.
    The United Nations Security Council in its four resolutions on the conflict reaffirmed
    the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and the inadmissibility of the
    use of force for the acquisition of territory of the other state. It has also recognized
    Nagorno-Karabakh as a part of Azerbaijan and called for immediate, complete and
    unconditional withdrawal of the occupying forces from all occupied territories of
    Azerbaijan. The United Nations General Assembly in its resolution 62/243 of 14 March

    2008, entitled “The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan”, expressed
    respect and support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Azerbaijan within its
    internationally recognized borders.
    The approach of the United Nations Security Council and the General Assembly reflected
    in the above-mentioned resolutions is fully consistent with the position of Azerbaijan,
    which from the beginning advocated for a step-by-step approach to the conflict settlement
    as the only viable option. A number of important steps have to be taken, starting with
    the withdrawal of Armenian forces from all the occupied territories, rehabilitation of
    these territories and return of the internally displaced persons to their homes in and
    around the Nagorno-Karabakh region, opening of all communications for the mutual
    use. This will allow removing the consequences of the conflict and will pave the way for
    the establishment of durable peace and stability in the region conducive to the
    elaboration of the legal status of the Nagorno-Karabakh region within Azerbaijan
    with due account of the equally heard voices of the Azerbaijani and Armenian
    communities of the region.
    The current settlement process gives some hopes for breaking the stalemate in the
    resolution of the conflict. The acceptance by Armenia of the step-by-step approach to
    the settlement of the conflict on the basis of the principles and norms of international
    law and the decisions and documents adopted in this framework as reflected in the
    Joint Declaration signed in Moscow in November 2008 by the Presidents of
    Azerbaijan, Armenia and the Russian Federation is a positive sign.
    Azerbaijan is ready to continue talks with Armenia’s leadership for the secure and
    stable South Caucasus region and beyond which will allow using the ample regional
    opportunities for the benefit of all.
    Excellencies,
    Against the background of the above-mentioned negative developments in the region
    let me briefly share positive economic performance of my country. Azerbaijan
    minimized the impact of the global economic downturn on its economy and
    managed to sustain the growth. In 2009 the national economy has retained its
    dynamism and as of today the GDP growth is recorded at almost 4 %. Since 2003 we
    have recorded the drop in the poverty rate to 13 percent from 44 percent. The
    Government of Azerbaijan has substantially improved trade and investment
    conditions in an effort to strengthen national competitiveness and spur private sector
    development, especially in the non-oil segment. Non-oil GDP grew at almost 16%,
    the highest rate in 5 years. In recognition of the results-oriented reforms and thoughtthrough
    economic policy Azerbaijan are qualified by the World Bank as one of the
    world’s top reformers.
    – 3 –
    Strategically located Azerbaijan with young, skilled population, ample resources and
    dynamic economy is inevitably taking a leading role in the region and increasingly
    becomes a pivotal player and credible actor beyond the region.
    The successful implementation of the infrastructure projects such as Baku-Supsa,
    Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan export oil pipelines and Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas pipeline
    boosted not only our economy, but also contributed to the development of
    neighbouring States. The modern energy infrastructure coupled with the vast energy
    resources transformed Azerbaijan into an energy hub of international importance.
    Azerbaijan has proven itself as a reliable partner and indispensable, secure energy
    source for Europe and beyond.
    Location of Azerbaijan at the crossroads of the East-West and North-South major
    transport corridors and rapidly developing national transportation infrastructure
    connected to the regional highway and railroad networks highlights the strategic
    importance of Azerbaijan. Completion of the construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars
    railroad and commissioning of the brand new seaport Alat on the Azerbaijani coast of
    the Caspian Sea will increase the role of Azerbaijan as a communication hub linking
    Europe with Asia.
    Azerbaijan also has put forward an initiative to establish a Trans-Eurasian Super
    Information Highway, which is expected to serve as a major element of the East-
    West transport corridor and facilitate the supply of 20 regional countries with
    internet, telecommunication systems, e-information resources and e-economies.
    Ladies and gentlemen,
    Today, we are living at a time of heightened religious and ethnic awareness, which in
    certain instances takes on exaggerated forms and sometimes is being maliciously
    exploited to fuel conflicts on ethnic, religious or cultural grounds. The broad
    recognition by the Member States of the United Nations of the role of the dialogue
    among civilizations, and specifically of inter-cultural and inter-religious harmony in
    maintaining international peace and security can only be praised.
    We fully support the recommendations of the Secretary-General on the importance of
    increasing educational efforts to remove hate messages, distortions, prejudice, and
    negative bias from textbooks and other educational media, and ensuring the basic
    knowledge and understanding of the world’s main cultures, civilizations and
    religions.
    As a country where long-standing traditions of tolerance and peaceful coexistence of
    different religions and ethnic groups over centuries became an inseparable part of the
    culture, Azerbaijan has repeatedly demonstrated its determination to act as a natural
    bridge bringing together different continents, cultures and civilizations through
    -4-
    promotion of inter-religious and intercultural dialogue based on mutual respect and
    understanding among peoples of different cultures and religions.
    Azerbaijan was among the first countries to join the Alliance of Civilizations
    initiative of Turkey and Spain. With a view to translating the recommendations
    contained in the “Alliance of Civilizations” report of the High-Level Group appointed
    by the U.N. Secretary-General into concrete actions, over the past years Azerbaijan
    hosted a number of important events. Most recently, we held Baku Forum on
    Expanding the Role of Women in Cross-cultural Dialogue, which we believe will
    raise the awareness of the role of women in intercultural dialogue. In December 2008
    we hosted the Conference of Culture Ministers of the Council of Europe Member
    States. For the first time in the history of the Council of Europe the ministers of the
    Member States of ISESCO and ALECSO joined the event. The adopted Baku
    Declaration envisages inter alia intercultural dialogue between European and
    neighbouring States.
    At the Fifth Islamic Conference of Culture Ministers the capital of Azerbaijan Baku
    was declared the Islamic Culture Capital for 2009. This autumn we will be hosting
    the Sixth Conference of Culture Ministers of the Organization of Islamic Conference,
    where we will continue discussions of our future actions in fostering dialogue among
    civilizations.
    Mr. President,
    The multilateral system with the United Nations at its heart undergoes serious
    changes that test its strength, viability and credibility. This requires more dedicated
    efforts aimed at strengthening the United Nations and promoting the effectiveness of
    the Organization through the implementation of its decisions and resolutions.
    Azerbaijan believes that, as the only truly global organization, the United Nations has to
    be stronger and capable in engaging in a range of pressing global issues in every part
    of the world, as well as in addressing aspirations and concerns of each Member State.
    We continue supporting the reform of the Organization, so that it could be renewed,
    revitalized and more responsive.
    Thank you!

  • Armenians Lick Lips at Prospect of Turkish Trade

    Armenians Lick Lips at Prospect of Turkish Trade

    Economists predict huge boost for Armenian economy if ties between Yerevan and Ankara are normalised.

    By Hasmik Hambardzumian in Yerevan (CRS No. 512, 25-Sep-09)

    Economists have welcomed the progress Yerevan and Ankara have made towards normalising relations, anticipating it will open up vast new markets for Armenian producers.

    There is currently a near-total blockade on Armenian goods going to Turkey. In 2008, according to Armenia’s National Statistics Service, less than two million US dollars worth of Armenia products were exported to Turkey, whereas more than 250 million dollars of Turkish goods were imported.

    Correcting this imbalance could prove revolutionary for Armenia, which currently depends on exporting most of its goods to Russia via Georgia, since its borders with both Turkey and Azerbaijan are closed.

    “A significant growth in the economy is expected, with an increase in the volume of exports and a growth in investment, as well as an improvement in the population’s living conditions,” said Mark Lewis, the head of the International Monetary Fund’s mission in Yerevan.

    Armenia and Turkey have lacked diplomatic relations since shortly after Yerevan gained independence from Moscow. Ankara, in a mark of support for its allies in Azerbaijan, who were fighting Armenian forces for control of the region of Nagorny Karabakh, cut ties in 1993 and has not restored them. Armenians still rule Karabakh, and the Azerbaijan-Armenia peace process is mired in difficulties.

    Armenia and Turkey, however, have made significant progress since the two presidents met at a football match between their national sides a year ago.

    They issued two protocols at the end of August, pledging to sign them after six weeks of public discussion. Appropriately, the six week discussion period, which should end with the border being opened, is due to end just before the return fixture.

    The initial meeting also featured a deal between the Turkish UNIT company and High-Voltage Electric Networks of Armenia to sell 1.5 billion kilowatt/hours of Armenian electricity to Turkey. The size of the contract is a clear sign of the potential for cooperation.

    Harutiun Khachatrian, an economic analyst from the Noyan Tapan agency, did not believe the official explanation for why no electricity has been sold so far. Officials say technical complications have prevented progress being made, but Khachatrian said its failure was linked to the progress of the peace talks.

    “The fact that the project is not yet completed is obviously political,” he said. “You cannot even imagine how beneficial this cooperation will be for Armenia. Completely new possibilities will be opened, joint ventures will appear, products will be exported.”

    Some economists have predicted, however, that the businessmen who currently dominate the Armenian market will object to the border with Turkey being opened, since it would let in a flood of competing products and services that could well undercut them on price.

    Few of the so-called oligarchs Armenian have actually expressed a negative opinion of the peace process, with just Hrant Vardanian, president of the tobacco and confectionary company Grand Holding, being quoted in April as saying he looked on it “without particular enthusiasm”.

    “The opening of the Turkish border means an end to monopolies. This is a significant step,” said Hrant Bagratian, a former prime minister and an economist by training.

    Bagratian said some reluctance to open the border to competition from Turkish operators was natural, since Armenian businesses have faced little competition since independence.

    He said Armenia just had to exploit its strengths, and trust its producers to become efficient enough to combat Turkish competitors.

    “Whatever they do in Turkey, they won’t have the same harvest of tomatoes, apricots and grapes that we have and in this sense, I think the opening of the border won’t do much harm to our farmers. It’s possible that there will be a temporary shock, but within one or two years we will see that we have good chances for development,” he said.

    Other businessmen agreed that Armenians should not be concerned, and should just rely on their country’s natural advantages. Besides the agricultural sector, the energy business, for example, is one where Armenia has a clear advantage, thanks to the Soviet legacy of decent infrastructure.

    “With the correct implementation of international standards, there is no cause for concern, since in Armenia the industrial base, the infrastructure and the workforce are cheaper than in Turkey, where there are high salaries. It is necessary to occupy ourselves with increasing the productivity and efficiency of our production methods,” said Gurgen Arsenian, founder of the Arsoil company.

    Hasmik Hambardzumian is a correspondent from www.panorama.am. IWPR country director Seda Muardyan contributed to this report.

  • Azerbaijan sends note to Turkey

    Azerbaijan sends note to Turkey

    25 September 2009 [17:09]

    The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry has presented a note to the Turkish Embassy in Azerbaijan.

    “The note stated that a while ago journalists of the Turkish NTV TV channel, who were issued accreditation in the so-called “Foreign Ministry of the Nagorno-Karabakh”, visited the occupied Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan. The fact disappointed Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry strongly opposes such visits to country’s occupied territory and requests the Turkish Foreign Ministry to investigate this fact and take measures,” Foreign Ministry’s Spokesperson Elkhan Polukhov said.

    http://www.today.az/news/politics/55915.html

  • Erdogan Hopes Sarkisian Will Visit Turkey

    Erdogan Hopes Sarkisian Will Visit Turkey

    E4C90BCF AC7D 4D60 94C1 691A16D63AE9 w393 sU.S. — Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan attends the United Nations Security Council meeting during the UN General Assembly at UN Headquarters in New York, 24Sep2009
    25.09.2009

    Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has expressed hope that President Serzh Sarkisian will pay a landmark visit to Turkey next month and said Ankara’s fence-mending agreements with Yerevan could be submitted to the Turkish parliament for ratification before that.

    Sarkisian has been invited by his Turkish counterpart, Abdullah Gul, to watch with him the return match of the two countries’ national football teams in the Turkish city of Bursa on October 14. The two presidents’ presence at their first World Cup qualifying played in Yerevan in September last year gave new impetus to the Turkish-Armenian rapprochement.

    “If the Turkish president can easily go to Armenia to watch a game, then it should be just as easy and simple for the Armenian president [to visit Turkey,]” Turkish media on Thursday quoted Erdogan as saying in a speech at Princeton University in the United States said. “I think asking for certain conditions to be met to decide to come is not the right way forward in international politics anymore.”

    Sarkisian has repeatedly stated that he will accept Gul’s invitation only if Turkey takes “real steps” to establish diplomatic relations and open its border with Armenia. The August 31 publication of two relevant draft protocols finalized by Ankara and Yerevan is thought to have made his visit much more likely.

    The trip would come just days after the anticipated signing of the Turkish-Armenian protocols, most probably in a third country. Various Turkish sources said last week that the signing ceremony has been tentatively scheduled for October 11-13.

    But Erdogan implied in his speech that the two sides could put pen to paper on the Western-backed deal even before that. “If we don’t see prejudice or some domestic political considerations at play, I believe the preparation for the agreement, which has been initialed between Turkey and Armenia, could be taken to Parliament to be ratified,” he said, according to “Today’s Zaman” newspaper. “We hope to take those steps by the 10th or 11th of next month.”

    Erdogan did not specify whether his government will seek to push the documents through Turkey’s Grand National Assembly, in which his ruling Justice and Development Party has a majority, if Armenia and Azerbaijan fail to achieve a breakthrough in their peace talks on Nagorno-Karabakh. Sarkisian and Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev are expected to a potentially decisive meeting on October 6.

    The Turkish premier reportedly said late last week that the Turkish-Armenian frontier will not be reopened until “Azerbaijan’s occupied territories are returned.” Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian swiftly criticized the remark, saying that it contradicts “the letter, spirit and aims” of the Turkish-Armenian agreements.

    https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1836254.html
  • Armenian Academicians Back Deal With Turkey

    Armenian Academicians Back Deal With Turkey

    A5CC9853 9FF9 4BDC B71C A59A66E38DED w393 sArmenia — The headquarters of the National Academy of Sciences.
    24.09.2009

    Armenia’s National Academy of Sciences officially expressed support on Thursday for the government’s policy of rapprochement with Turkey and the recently publicized Turkish-Armenian relations in particular.

    The state-funded institution, which rarely challenges government decisions, discussed the matter at a special meeting of its top decision-making body, the General Assembly, held late Wednesday. The meeting, attended by more than 150 members of the academy and directors of its research institutes, took place behind the closed doors. Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian also took part in the discussion.

    Journalists were only allowed to be present at the opening remarks made by Radik Martirosian, the president of the Academy. He was reported to claim that public attitudes towards the two draft protocols on the normalization of Armenia’s relations with Turkey have been “mainly positive” despite existing “concerns” about some of their provisions.

    Martirosian noted that all Armenian presidents sought to mend times with Turkey but that only Serzh Sarkisian has managed to achieve major progress with his “dynamic and active foreign policy.”

    In a statement issued the next day, the academy’s press service said the meeting overwhelmingly adopted a resolution welcoming Sarkisian’s efforts to “settle relations with neighbors and get Armenia out of the [Turkish] blockade.” “It is said in the resolution that the normalization of relations with Turkey and the opening of the Turkish-Armenian border without preconditions would contribute to the strengthening of Armenia’s geopolitical positions,” the statement said. The agreements allow for the “continuation of that policy,” it added.

    The academy meeting was part of “internal political consultations” which Ankara and Yerevan have pledged to undertake before signing the deal next month. Sarkisian discussed the sensitive issue with leaders of 52 political parties mostly loyal to him last week.

    https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1835693.html
  • Sarkisian To Seek Diaspora Support For Turkey Diplomacy

    Sarkisian To Seek Diaspora Support For Turkey Diplomacy

    D5F8D22F 4CFA 49BD AB79 ABED1716AF6F w393 sArmenia — President Serzh Sarkisian and Catholicos Garegin II meet on 24Sept., 2009
    24.09.2009
    Emil Danielyan, Karine Kalantarian

    President Serzh Sarkisian said on Thursday that he will tour major Armenian communities abroad early next month to explain and promote his far-reaching diplomatic overtures to Turkey which many in the Diaspora have been following with unease.

    Sarkisian made the announcement as he met with Catholicos Garegin II at the Echmiadzin headquarters of the Armenian Apostolic Church. He said he will start on October 1 a series of visits to Paris, New York, Los Angeles, Beirut and Rostov-on-Don, Russia.

    All of those cities and their surrounding areas have sizable ethnic Armenian populations. Sarkisian was quoted by his press service as telling Garegin that he wants to hear community leaders’ “views on the process of the normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations.”

    The supreme head of the Armenian Church welcomed the initiative. “The Diaspora is an important and inseparable part of our people and it is only right for our Diaspora sons … to be able to hear answers from you personally to questions preoccupying them,” Garegin said, according to the presidential press service. “Also, you will expose yourself to the thoughts, opinions and concerns of our Diaspora sons.”

    Some Diaspora leaders have expressed serious concern about key points of two Turkish-Armenian draft protocols envisaging the normalization of bilateral relations. They are particularly critical of the planned creation of a Turkish-Armenian panel of historians that would look into the 1915 mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire.

    Diaspora groups also object to another protocol clause that commits Armenia to recognizing its existing border with Turkey. They argue that it would preclude future Armenian territorial claims to areas in eastern Turkey that were populated by their ancestors until the 1915-1918 massacres.

    The Beirut-based Catholicos Aram I, the number two figure in the Armenian Church hierarchy, added his voice to those concerns in a letter to Sarkisian made public on Thursday. “The ongoing developments in the establishment of diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey have become a cause for serious concern in the Diaspora,” he wrote.

    Aram singled out the planned “sub-commission” of historians for criticism. He said its existence would make it easier for Ankara to deny that the slaughter of more than one million Ottoman Armenians was a genocide.

    Aram and Diaspora dioceses of the Armenian Church subordinated to him are reputedly close to the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun), one of the most vocal critics of Sarkisian’s Turkish policy which is particularly influential in the Diaspora. Dashnaktsutyun’s organization in Armenia is now actively campaigning against the signing of the Turkish-Armenian agreements.

    The church’s main, Echmiadzin-based Catholicosate has rarely challenged Yerevan governments and will likely be more supportive of the Turkish-Armenian rapprochement. Garegin told Sarkisian that the church’s Supreme Spiritual Council will meet soon to discuss and formulate its position on the issue.

    The planned meetings will be part of “internal political consultations” which Ankara and Yerevan pledged to initiate before signing the controversial protocols by mid-October. Sarkisian described the intensifying debates on the matter as “very useful.”

    “Of course, they have some emotional manifestations and elements,” he told Garegin. “And it could not have been otherwise because a huge segment of our people are a generation of persons subjected to genocide. Besides, we have our shrines, our churches, our [medieval] capital and the remnants of many, many people’s ancestral homes across the [Turkish] border.”

    “I do realize this because often times I myself internally struggle with my emotions,” added Sarkisian.

    https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1835696.html