Category: Southern Caucasus

  • Turkey To Launch Armenian-Language Radio Station

    Turkey To Launch Armenian-Language Radio Station

    Reuters

    Turkey’s state broadcaster plans to launch an Armenian-language radio station, Anatolian state news agency said on Friday, amid tentative moves by Turkey and its neighbor Armenia towards restoring diplomatic ties.

    Relations between the two countries are haunted by the killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War One, which Armenia says amounted to genocide. Ankara accepts many Armenians were killed, but denies genocide was committed. Since then large numbers of Armenian speakers have left Turkey but some 40-50,000 remain, mostly in Istanbul.

    “At this stage, we will refrain from any comments,” an Armenian Foreign Ministry spokesman said when asked about the report of the planned radio station on Friday.

    The announcement comes as some U.S. lawmakers, ahead of a visit by President Barack Obama to Turkey on April 6-7, are renewing a push to brand the 1915 massacre genocide.

    Ankara has warned that a new resolution by the U.S. Congress could seriously hurt Washington’s ties with NATO ally Turkey. It also argues such a resolution would derail the drive to mend relations with Armenia, including moves to open the border.

    Anatolian said the Armenian-language channel should go on air in “two to three months.” The official day of remembrance in Armenia is April 24.

    The genocide issue, which caused U.S.-Turkish relations to plummet in 2007, threatens to complicate Obama’s trip as Washington hopes to work closely with Turkey on Afghanistan, Iraq, the Middle East and the Caucasus. During his 2008 campaign for the White House, Obama referred to the killings of Armenians in World War One as genocide. Obama is now confronted with a choice between breaking a campaign pledge or risking defense ties with Turkey.

    Turkey and Armenia have no formal diplomatic relations but officials have held recent tentative discussions. Anatolian said state-run Turkish Radio and Television Corp (TRT), which launched a television channel in the once-banned Kurdish language in January, also planned to launch a Kurdish radio channel.

  • Sarkisian In Phone Call With Clinton

    Sarkisian In Phone Call With Clinton

     

     By Emil Danielyan

    President Serzh Sarkisian discussed a wide range of issues, including Armenia’s ongoing rapprochement with Turkey, in a phone call with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reported by his office on Wednesday.

    As they spoke, U.S. lawmakers formally introduced a fresh draft resolution that refers to the mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide and urges President Barack Obama to do the same. The Obama administration did not immediately react to the initiative strongly backed by the influential Armenian community in the United States.

    A short statement issued by the Armenian presidential press service said Sarkisian and Clinton discussed U.S.-Armenian relations and, in particular, the recent extension of a freeze on some of American economic assistance to Yerevan. The U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation made the decision, citing the “status of democratic governance” in Armenia, at a March 11 meeting of its governing board chaired by Clinton.

    The statement said that Sarkisian and Clinton also touched upon international efforts to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and “the Turkish-Armenian political dialogue.” It gave no details.

    The U.S. State Department issued no statements on Clinton’s first-ever conversation with the Armenian leader. The acting department spokesman, Robert Wood, did not mention it at a daily press briefing in Washington on Tuesday.

    The current and previous U.S. administrations have welcomed the dramatic thaw in the traditionally strained Turkish-Armenian relations. After months of high-level negotiations, the two neighboring states appear to be on the verge of to establishing diplomatic relations and opening their border.

    Official Ankara has repeatedly warned that Obama will set back the long-awaited normalization of Turkish-Armenian ties if he publicly describes the 1915-1918 massacres of Armenians as genocide. “A bad step by the United States would only worsen the process,” Foreign Minister Ali Babacan said on March 8.

    Babacan’s Armenian counterpart, Eduard Nalbandian, dismissed Turkish warnings during a visit to Paris last week.

    The highly sensitive issue is expected to feature large during Obama’s trip to Turkey scheduled for April 5. Turkish leaders already raised their concerns with Clinton when she visited Ankara earlier this month.

    During the U.S. presidential race, both Obama and Clinton repeatedly called the slaughter of more than a million Ottoman Armenians a genocide and pledged to reaffirm such declarations once in office. Neither leader has publicly commented on the subject since taking office.

    “The Los Angeles Times” reported on Tuesday that the Obama administration is now considering postponing an official U.S. recognition of the genocide in view of the unprecedented Turkish-Armenian rapprochement and Turkey’s importance for the success of U.S. plans on Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq. “At this moment, our focus is on how, moving forward, the United States can help Armenia and Turkey work together to come to terms with the past,” Michael Hammer, a spokesman for the U.S. National Security Council, told the paper.

    The Armenian-American community and its allies in the U.S. Congress, meanwhile, hope that Obama will honor his campaign pledges. “We do not minimize Ankara’s threats of adverse action when you recognize the genocide, or when Congress takes action to formally recognize the genocide, but we believe that our alliance is strong enough to withstand the truth,” a group of congressmen wrote in a recent letter to the president.

    Stepping up the pressure on the White House, the lawmakers on Tuesday submitted to the House of Representatives a bill that calls on Obama to “accurately characterize the systematic and deliberate annihilation of 1,500,000 Armenians as genocide” in his statement due on April 24, the genocide remembrance day.

    Armenian-American lobbying groups, meanwhile, seem confident that Obama will not bow to the Turkish pressure. “The Armenian government has been clear that no linkage exists between normalizing relations and U.S. genocide recognition, and aside from Turkish lobbying efforts, no one seriously thinks that President Obama, Vice President Biden or Secretary Clinton will jeopardize U.S. and their own credibility in opposing genocide recognition,” Van Krikorian, a senior member of the Armenian Assembly of America, told RFE/RL. “Turkey continues to come to terms with its own past and a reversion to the policy of accommodating denial will cut that off at the knees.”

    https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1600437.html

  • Another Armenian genocide resolution

    Another Armenian genocide resolution

    By MICHAEL DOYLE

    McClatchy Newspapers

    The perennial political battle over an Armenian genocide resolution is joined again, as lawmakers Tuesday introduced a symbolic measure that puts President Barack Obama in a bind.

    The resolution backed by lawmakers who represent large numbers of Armenian-American constituents calls on Obama to “accurately characterize the systematic and deliberate annihilation of 1,500,000 Armenians as genocide.”

    The bill introduced with 77 co-sponsors in the House of Representatives largely tracks similar resolutions introduced in previous years. Its fundamental point is to apply the term “genocide” to events that occurred between 1915 and 1923 during the Ottoman Empire’s final years. The empire was based in what is now the Republic of Turkey.

    “It has never served our national interest to become complicit in the denial of genocide, and it never will,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. “While there are still some survivors left, we have a compelling moral obligation to speak plainly about the past.”

    But what some call a moral obligation strikes others as a diplomatic conundrum. Obama had one of the first telephone calls of his presidency with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan, with whom Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has met personally. Obama in early April will visit Turkey, where the genocide resolution is anathema.

    The biggest test for the Obama administration is what the president will say on or around April 24, the traditional date for any Armenian genocide commemoration. A Los Angeles Times story published Tuesday suggested that Obama might postpone the traditional commemorative statement. A White House spokesman could not be reached Tuesday to elaborate.

    “The resolution would be insulting to Turkey and would be very poorly received,” said James H. Holmes, a retired U.S. ambassador who is now president of the American Turkish Council. He added that “some very significant commercial opportunities” might be put at risk.

    As a presidential candidate, Obama bluntly characterized the deaths of Armenians.

    “There was a genocide that did take place against the Armenian people,” Obama said during one filmed campaign appearance. “It is one of these situations where we have seen a constant denial on the part of the Turkish government and others that this has occurred.”

    Clinton, while a senator, co-sponsored the Senate’s version of a genocide resolution. National Security Council staffer Samantha Power, a high-profile foreign policy adviser during the campaign, filmed a video specifically aimed at Armenian-American voters considering a vote for Obama.

    President Ronald Reagan in 1984 issued an Armenian genocide recognition. But other presidents, including George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, have made similar campaign attestations only to retreat from the genocide term once in office.

    State Department officials have testified that historians differ as to whether the word genocide properly applies. More generally, diplomats have warned of potential diplomatic fallout.

    “America can ill afford to lose the support of a critical ally like Turkey,” Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla., a leader in the Congressional Caucus on Turkey, declared at one 2007 House hearing.

    Schiff and Rep. George Radanovich, R.-Calif., have traded off as the resolution’s chief sponsor, depending upon which party controls the House. Neither, though, has yet advanced the resolution to the House floor.

    In 2007, amid intense pressure from the Pentagon, the White House and Turkey, 25 House members withdrew their support for a similar Armenian genocide resolution. At the time, military leaders warned that the resolution would undermine U.S. relations with a valued ally whose support was needed for success in Iraq.

    Seven years before, literally minutes before Radanovich was going to bring a genocide resolution to the House floor, then-Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., pulled the plug following an urgent phone call from the White House.

    Posted on Tue, Mar. 17, 2009 06:04 PM

  • Armenia and Armenians in Int’l Treaties, Ann Arbor, Mar. 19-21

    Armenia and Armenians in Int’l Treaties, Ann Arbor, Mar. 19-21

    International Conference
    Armenia and Armenians in International Treaties

    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, March 19-21, 2009

    Day 1 – Thursday, March 19, 2009 – Michigan Union (Anderson D)

    Session I – 9:00-12:00

    Dr. Levon Avdoyan, “Unintended Consequences: Three Ancient Treaties
       and the Armenians” (63,299, 387 CE)
    Prof. Robert H. Hewsen, “Armenia in the Treaty of Nisibis of 299 CE”
    Prof. Seta B. Dadoyan,”From the ‘Medinan Oaths’ to the Shah’s
       ‘Compact’ for New Julfa-Isfahan: The Millennial Record of
       Islamic-Armenian Protocols”
    Prof. Johannes Preiser-Kapeller, “Armenian Aristocrats as Diplomatic
       Partners of Eastern Roman Emperors, 387-884/885 AD”

    Session II – 2:00-5:00

    Prof. Azat Bozoyan, “The Treaty of Deapolis (1107) as an Example of
       the Byzantine Policy of ‘Divide and Rule’”
    Prof. Claude Mutafian, “The International Treaties of the Last Kingdom
       of Armenia

    Mr. Armen Kouyoumdjian, “When Madrid Was the Capital of Armenia
    Prof. Ali Kavani, “The Treaty of 1639 and its consequences for Armenia
       and Armenians”

    Day 2 – Friday, March 20, 2009 – Michigan Union (Anderson D)

    Session III – 9:00-12:00

    Dr. Sebouh Aslanian, “Julfan Agreements with Foreign States and
       Chartered Companies: Exploring the limits of Julfan Collective
       Self-Representation in the Early Modern Age”
    Prof. Kevork Bardakjian, “The National ‘Constitution’ of 1863: A
       Dhimmi-Muslim Contract?”
    Prof. Aram Yengoyan, “No War, No Peace: The Treaty of Brest Litovsk, 1918″
    Prof. Richard Hovannisian,”The Unratified Treaty of Alexandropol as
       the Basis for Subsequent Russian-Turkish-Armenian Relations”

    Session IV – 2:00-4:00

    Dr. Fuat Dundar, “Diplomacy of Statistics: Discussing the Number of
       Armenians during Diplomatic Negotiations (1878-1914)”
    Dr. Vladimir Vardanyan, “Peace Treaties of Armenia and Relating to
       Armenia: A Legal Analysis”
    Prof. Dennis Papazian, “The Treaty of Lausanne

    Day 3 – Saturday, March 21, 2009 – Michigan Union (Wolverine ABC)

    Session V – 8:30-12:00

    Dr. Lusine Taslakyan, “Armenia in International Environmental Conventions”
    Mr. Emil Sanamyan, “The OSCE-CFE Treaty and Breaches in the
       International Legal System: Armenia’s Predicament Today”
    Mr. Rouben Shougarian, “Yielding More to Gain the Essential: The
       Russo-Armenian Treaty of 1997”
    Prof. Sevane Garibian, “From the 1915 Allied Declaration to the Treaty
       of Sevres
    : The Legacy of the Armenian Genocide in International
    Criminal Law”

    Session VI – 1:30-4:00

    Prof. Keith Watenpaugh, “The League of Nations and the Formation of
       Armenian Genocide Denial
    Pascual Ohanian, JD, “International Treaties in International Penal
       Law Concerning Crimes Against Humanity: Applicability of the Juridical
       Experience in Argentina and Chile to the Turkish-Ottoman State and
       Turkish Republic for Acts Perpetrated from 1910 to 1923 and Beyond”
    Prof. Catherine Kessedjian, “Beyond Treaties”

    Live webcast:

  • Armenian, Turkish Civic Groups Hold Conference

    Armenian, Turkish Civic Groups Hold Conference

    By Tigran Avetisian

    Representatives of more than 30 Armenian and Turkish non-governmental organizations met for a first-ever joint conference in Yerevan at the weekend to discuss ways of assisting in the ongoing dialogue between their estranged nations.

    The event highlighted a dramatic thaw in relations between Armenia and Turkey. After months of intensive diplomatic contacts the governments of the two neighboring states appear close to establishing diplomatic relations and opening the Turkish-Armenian border.

    According to Artak Kirakosian of the Yerevan-based Civil Society Institute, one of the Armenian organizers of the conference, it was initiated by Turkish civil society activists with the financial assistance of the British embassy in Turkey. He said they were emboldened and inspired by Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s historic September 2008 visit to Yerevan.

    Participants of the two-day conference broadly agreed on the need for an unconditional normalization of bilateral ties. Some of them were optimistic about chances of that happening in the nearest future. “I am very hopeful and positive,” said Hakan Ataman of the Ankara-based Civil Society Development Center (CSDC).

    The conference skirted sensitive problems hampering the border opening, focusing instead on the situation with democracy and human rights, environmental problems as well as youth and women’s issues in the two countries. Kirakosian told RFE/RL that the participants, among them the daughter of the slain Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, Delal, agreed to meet on a regular basis and take joint actions in each of these areas.

    “We live in the same region and naturally have the same problems,” said Lilit Asatrian, chairwoman of the Armenian Association of Young Women. “I believe that young people can make a very big contribution to settling historical problems that we have with our neighbor.”

    The most sensitive and significant of those problems is differing interpretations of the World War One-era mass killings and deportations of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire seen by many historians as the first genocide of the 20th century. “I think that the Armenian genocide is the most important problem of the Turkish people,” Ataman told RFE/RL. “The Armenian genocide is not only an Armenian question. It’s also a Turkish question.”

    Gokhan Kilinc, another Turkish participant, said Turkish-Armenian civil society contacts should concentrate on the future. “We should discuss not the past but what we can do for the future,” he said.

    https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1600398.html

  • Armenian Studies at a Threshold Society for Armenian Studies

    Armenian Studies at a Threshold Society for Armenian Studies

    35th Anniversary Conference
    March 26-28, 2009
    University of California, Los Angeles

    Session 1. Thursday, 1:00-2:30 p.m.
    Medieval Literature and the Arts
    Theo van Lint, Oxford University, Chair

    * Andrea Scala, University of Milan, “About the Name of the Latin
       Language in Classical Armenian”
    * Robert Thomson, Oxford University, Emeritus, “Armenian Biblical
       Commentaries: The Present State of Research”
    * Sona Haroutyunian, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, “Dante
       Alighieri and the Mekhitarist School of Translation”

    Session 2. Thursday, 2:30-4:00 p.m.
    Medieval History and Culture
    Anne Elizabeth Redgate, Newcastle University, Chair

    * Sergio La Porta, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, “Cultural
       Interaction and Cultural Strategies in Post-Seljuk Armenia”
    * Sara Nur Yildiz, Bilgi University, Istanbul, “Competing for the
       Il-Khan’s Favor: Seljuk and Armenian Rivalry in Thirteenth Century
       Mongol-Dominated Anatolia”
    * Tom Sinclair, University of Cyprus, “Coins, Trade, and Cities in
       Greater Armenia during the Il-Khanid Period”

    Refreshments, 4:00-4:15 p.m.

    Session 3. Thursday, 4:15.6:30 p.m.
    Researching the Contemporary Armenian Diaspora: Consolidating the
       Past, Situating the Future
    Khachig Tölölyan, Wesleyan University, Chair

    * Sossie Kasbarian, Graduate Institute of International and
       Development Studies, Geneva, “From Exile to Empowerment Reinvigorating
       the Concept of Diaspora: The Armenian Case”
    * Aida Boudjikanian, Montreal, “The Literature on the Armenian
       Diaspora in France and Canada”
    * Susan Pattie, University College London, “Twenty-First Century
       Armenians: Is Anyone Paying Attention?”
    * Anny Bakalian, City University of New York, “Still Alive and
       Thriving: Assimilation and Identity among Armenian Americans in the
       21st Century”
    * Nelida Boulghourdjian, University of Buenos Aires, “Migration
       Studies in Argentina: The Armenian Case”
    * Discussant: Aram Yengoyan, University of California, Davis

    Friday, March 27, 2009, 1200 Rolfe Hall, 9 A.M. 9 P.M.

    Session 4. Friday, 9:00 a.m.
    Armenian History as Connected History
    Houri Berberian, California State University-Long Beach, Chair

    * Sebouh Aslanian, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, “From
       ‘Autonomous’ to ‘Interactive’ Histories: World History’s Challenge to
       Armenian Studies”
    * Peter Cowe, UCLA, “The Armenian Oikoumene of the 11th to 14th
       Century in Search of a Holistic Discourse”
    * Rachel Goshgarian, Zohrab Center, New York, “The Futuwwa and
       Armenian History in the Late Medieval ‘Islamicate’ World of Anatolia”
    * Elyse Semerdjian, Whitman College, “Morality, Communalism, and the
       Armenians of Ottoman Aleppo”

    Refreshments, 11:00-11:15 a.m.

    Session 5. Friday, 11:15 a.m.1:00 p.m.
    Economy, Society, and Culture of Early Modern East Central Europe
       (14th 19th Centuries)
    George Bournoutian, Iona College, Chair

    * Andreas Helmedach, Center for the History and Culture of East
       Central Europe (GWZO), Leipzig, “Armenian Minorities as Actors in
       Early Modern Globalization”
    * Bálint Kovács, Center for the History and Culture of East Central
       Europe (GWZO), Leipzig, “Interregional Cultural Relations of the
       Transylvanian Armenians in the 17th and 18th Centuries”
    * Judit Pál, Babes-Bolyai-University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, “The
       Social and Economic History of the Armenians in Transylvania in the
       18th and 19th Centuries”

    Lunch Recess, 1:00-1:45 p.m.

    Session 6. Friday, 1:45-3:45 p.m.
    Between Perversion and Representation: Sexual Allegories in Armenian Literature
    Rubina Peroomian, UCLA, Chair and Discussant

    * Tamar Boyadjian, UCLA, “The Female City and Its Textual Function:
       Grigor Tghay’s Lament over the City of Jerusalem”
    * Talar Chahinian, UCLA, “The Crisis of Incest: Reconfiguring the
       Catastrophe in Orpuni’s ‘Vartsu Seniag, ‘ Sarafian’s Ishkhanuhin, and
       Shahnur’s ‘Buynuzlenere’”
    * Myrna Douzjian, UCLA, “Challenging Social and Literary Norms:
       Sexual Agency in Violet Grigorian’s Poetry”
    * Lilit Keshishyan, UCLA, “Sexual Perversion as Political Allegory in
       Gurgen Khanjian’s Hivandanots”

    Session 7. Friday, 4:00-6:00 p.m.
    New Perspectives on The Armenian Genocide
    George Shirinian, Zoryan Institute, Chair

    * Taner Akçam, Clark University, “Ottoman Documents and Genocidal
       Intent of the Union and Progress Party”
    * Janet Klein, University of Akron, “The Kurds and the Armenian
       Genocide: Reflections on Historiography”
    * Lerna Ekmekcio lu, New York University, “Approaching the Unlucky
       Sister and Her Child: Sexual Violence as a Marker during and after the
       Armenian Genocide”
    * Vahram Shemmassian, California State University-Northridge, “The
       Rescue of Captive Genocide Survivors, 1919-1921”

    Light Dinner Recess (on site), 6:00-7:00 p.m.

    Session 8. Friday, 7:00-9:00 p.m.
    Contemporary Armenia
    Hovann Simonian, University of Southern California, Chair

    * Khatchik Der Ghougassian, Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires,
       “Market Fundamentalism, Economic Hardship, and Social Protest in Armenia”
    * Konrad Siekierski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland,
       “Nation and Faith, Past and Present: The Contemporary Discourse of the
       Armenian Apostolic Church in Armenia”
    * Tamara Tonoyan, National Institute of Health, Yerevan, “HIV/AIDS in
       Armenia: Migration as a Socio-Economic and Cultural Component of
       Women’s Risk Settings”
    * Anahid Keshishian-Aramouni, UCLA, “Inknagir Magazine: Frivolous
       Iconoclasm or Marker of Artistic Liberty?”
    * Gregory Areshian, UCLA, Pavel Avetisyan and Armine Hayrapetyan,
       Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Yerevan, “Archaeology in
       Post-Soviet Armenia: New Discoveries, Problems, and Perspectives”

    Session 9. Saturday, 9:00-10:30 a.m.
    Discourse and Violence: Revisiting the Adana Massacres of 1909
    Richard Hovannisian, UCLA, Chair

    * Ohannes Kiliçdagi, Bilgi University, Istanbul, “Ottomanism among
       the Anatolian Armenians after the 1908 Revolution”
    * Bedross Der Matossian, MIT, “From Verbal to Physical Violence:
       Ihsan Fikri’s Itidal and the Massacres of Adana in 1909”
    * Rubina Peroomian, UCLA, “The Poetics of Violence in Literary
       Responses to the Adana Massacres”

    Session 10. Saturday, 10:30 a.m.12:45 p.m. The State of Armenian
    Studies Chairs and Programs in the United States Marc Mamigonian,
    NAASR, Chair (with comments on prehistory of Armenian programs)

    * Taner Akçam, Clark University
    * Kevork Bardakjian, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
    * Peter Cowe, UCLA
    * Richard Hrair Dekmejian, USC
    * Barlow Der Mugrdechian, California State University-Fresno
    * Roberta Ervine, St. Nersess Seminary
    * Richard Hovannisian, UCLA
    * Jirair Libaridian, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
    * Christina Maranci, Tufts University
    * Simon Payaslian, Boston University
    * Ara Sanjian, Armenian Research Center, UM-Dearborn
    * Vahram Shemmassian, California State University-Northridge

    Lunch Recess, 12:45-1:30 p.m.

    Session 11. Saturday, 1:30-3:00 p.m.
    Church Politics and Identity
    Abraham Terian, St. Nersess Seminary, Chair

    * Paul Werth, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, “Rumors and Projects
       of Ecclesiastical Union: Armenians, Orthodoxy, and the Problem of
       Confessional Distinctions in Imperial Russia”
    * Ara Sanjian, University of Michigan-Dearborn, “The British Foreign
       Office, the Church of England, and the Crisis in the Armenian Church
       at Antelias, 1956-1963”
    * Marlen Eordegian, Vanderbilt University, “Straddling Religion and
       Politics: The Case of the Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem”

    Session 12. Saturday, 3:15-5:45 p.m.
    Armenians, World War II, and Repatriation
    Barbara Merguerian, Armenian International Women’s Association, Chair

    * Vartan Matiossian, Hovnanian School, New Jersey, “‘White’
       Armenians, ‘Aryan’ Armenians: Combating Racial Views during the First
       Half of the 20th Century”
    * Gregory Aftandilian, Washington, D.C., “World War II as an Enhancer
       of Armenian-American Second Generation Identity”
    * Levon Thomassian, California State University-Northridge, “Summer of ’42”
    * Astrig Atamian, National Institute of Oriental Languages and
       Civilizations, Paris, “Being an Armenian Communist in France during
       the Cold War”
    * Sevan Yousefian, UCLA, “The Formation of Soviet Armenian
       Immigration Policy: Diaspora Networks, Armenian Cadres, and the
       Postwar Repatriation Campaign”
    * Joanne Laycock, University of Manchester, “‘Belongings’: People and
       Possessions in the Armenian Repatriations, 1947-1949”

    Concluding Comments and Discussion, 5:45-6:00 p.m.

    Architectural Exhibit by US Chapter of Armenian Architects Association

    Conference Sponsors: Society for Armenian Studies UCLA Center for Near
    Eastern Studies UCLA Center for European and Eurasian Studies USC
    Institute of Armenian Studies National Association for Armenian
    Studies and Research

    and The Armenian Studies Programs of Armenian Center, Columbia
    University Armenian Research Center, University of Michigan-Dearborn
    California State University-Fresno California State
    University-Northridge University of California, Los Angeles University
    of Michigan-Ann Arbor

    Thirty-Fifth Anniversary Banquet, Taghlyan Center 1201 N. Vine Street,
    Hollywood, California, 7:30 p.m.
    Banquet Sponsor: Armenian Educational Foundation