Category: Azerbaijan

  • Georgia’s reaction

    Georgia’s reaction

    Georgia Overreacts to Defeat in War Against South Ossetia by Resorting to Harassment, Political Repression Against Javakheti Armenians

    By Appo Jabarian
    Executive Publisher / Managing Editor
    USA Armenian Life Magazine
    Friday,  February 6, 2009 

    On January 27, the Virk Party in Samtskhe-Javakheti released a statement concerning recent developments in the region referring to arrests of prominent Georgian Armenians, saying: “It is not the first time such incidents have occurred in Javakhk,” and that “they clearly have an anti-Armenian subtext.” Virk urged the Georgian authorities to release Grigor Minasian and Sarkis Hakobjanian immediately. They are a youth club director and local representative of Aznavour pour l’Arménie, respectively, in the town of Akhaltsikhe. 

    These two Armenian leaders’ arrests were preceded by:
    – The March 9, 2006 murder of an ethnic Armenian, Gevorg Gevorgyan in Tsalka region; and
    – The July 21, 2008 illegal arrest of the leader of the United Javakhk Democratic Alliance Vahagn Chakhalian. Chakhalian is credited for having led the protest rallies condemning the brutal murder of Gevorgyan in Tsalka.
    Chakhalian, the leader of the United Javakhk Democratic Alliance said in a statement issued on 28 January: “The Georgian authorities undertake successive actions to encourage the immigration of the Javakheti Armenians and to change the ethnic picture of the region. Thus … attempts to georgianize the Armenian churches are made… In Javakheti there is no alternative to using the Georgian language, which is imposed at all levels of social life. The Javakheti Armenians are refused the right to establish an Armenian language based university.”
    He continued: “After the murder of the ethnic Armenian – Gevorg Gevorgyan in Tsalka region on March 9, 2006, his relatives and friends organized a protest action which was forcefully broken up by the police. This caused a well-grounded discontent of the Javakheti Armenians. The ‘United Javakhk Democratic Alliance’ placed itself at the head of this wave of protests.”
    He added: “After each protest action I, as a leader of the ‘United Javakhk Democratic Alliance,’ had a meeting with the Georgian authorities. The latter kept on promising to solve the problems regarding the Javakheti Armenians, however, the promises remained unfulfilled. The authorities advised us to refrain from mass protest actions and to pursue our objectives through participation in elections and other democratic processes. The ‘United Javakhk Democratic Alliance’ followed this advice. In October 2006 we took part in the elections to the local self-administration bodies, however blatant falsifications of the voting results by the authorities deprived the ‘United Javakhk Democratic Alliance’ of the opportunity to have any visible participation in the local self-administration bodies. The protest action organized by the ‘United Javakhk Democratic Alliance’ was put down by police by means of provocation and use of force. Throughout the year 2007 the Georgian authorities had been undertaking successive actions to liquidate the ‘United Javakhk Democratic Alliance’ and to ensure my political isolation and neutralization. The culmination of these actions became the events that took place in July 17-21, 2008.”
    Chakhalian concluded: “Today, 6 months after my imprisonment, the Georgian authorities charge me with organizing protest actions in Akhalkalaki in 2006, – the actions by means of which the Javakheti Armenians voiced the problems and issues they were concerned about and requested the Georgian authorities to solve them; -the protest actions during which the Javakheti Armenians voiced their discontent about the blatant falsifications made by the authorities during the elections to the local self-administration bodies, claiming to declare the election results invalid. Thus, in this courtroom I am stating the following: this lawsuit is a farce, and the reason for continuously delaying the trial lies in the fact that the Georgian authorities are afraid of me, as a political activist, who is a mouthpiece for the rights of the Javakheti Armenians. By charging me you charge the Armenian minority of your country. The arrests of Akhaltsikha Armenian activists Grigor Minasyan, and Sargis Hakobjanyan are also the result of this fear. This is a new provocation, which aims to impel the Javakheti Armenians to extremist actions and by this to discredit the peaceful struggle of Javakheti Armenians for their language, educational and religious rights.”
    This writer along with other peace- and freedom-loving activists worldwide, joins Mr. Chakhalian in urging the Georgian authorities to:
    – Stop all the fabricated criminal cases brought against the members of the “United Javakhk Democratic Alliance;”
    – Stop all illegal political and economic persecutions. Release all political prisoners who were arrested for their activities aimed at protection of the rights of the Armenian minority, including those arrested in Akhaltsikhe;
    – Cease all the undemocratic programs aimed at the artificial change of the demographic picture of the Samtskhe-Javakheti and Tsalka regions;
    – Solve all the linguistic-educational, socio-economic and cultural problems the Armenian minority of Georgia is concerned about;
    Register the Armenian Apostolic Church and return to its jurisdiction all the churches that have been confiscated during the Soviet era;
    – Legally authorize the use of the Armenian language in the work of the local self-administration bodies and in general office work in Samtskhe-Javakheti and Tsalka regions;
    – Respect the right of the Georgian-Armenian community to establishing an Armenian university in Akhalkalaki.
    Armenians are the largest ethnic minority in Georgia at about 10% of the population. The Armenian community is mostly concentrated in the capital Tbilisi and the Samtskhe-Javakheti region, which borders Armenia to the south. Armenians form the clear majority (over 58%) in this region. Javakhk is the historic name of the region in the southwest of Georgia, where 3 regions out of 6 are mainly Armenian populated, with some 100,000 Armenians living there. Another 100,000 or more Armenians live in Tbilisi and elsewhere in Georgia.
    Armenians living in Georgia demand respect for their rights as a national minority which they claim are being violated by the Georgian authorities.
    Minasian and Hakobjanian remain in detention in Tbilisi on fabricated and politically motivated charges of “espionage” among others. So far, the Georgian authorities have given no information about what country they had “spied for” and what kind of “armed group they had formed.”
    Yerevan-based Doctor of Philology Haykazun Alvrtsyan said the accusations of the Georgian authorities were nonsense. The Georgian authorities “want to give a criminal implication to a political problem,” in order to justify a witch-hunt.
    According to Alvrtsyan, the Georgian officials are trying to destabilize the situation and to ultimately cleanse Javakhk from Armenians, thus allowing Turkey to surround Armenia. He said: “Let’s not forget that Javakhk is the only link connecting Armenia” with the outside world and Europe.
    Spokesperson for the Interior Ministry Shota Khizanishvili told Civil.ge on January 23 “further statements on the matter will be made later.” According to Armenian Public Radio, those statements were expected on January 26. No statements were made as of press time on Monday Feb. 2.
    Following the separation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, many Georgians have suspected the country’s other ethnic minorities – currently comprising about 22 percent of the population and living outside the Georgian mainstream – of harboring separatist intentions.
    Shirak Torosian is a parliament member from the governing Republican Party and leader of the Javakhk Compatriotic Union. He visited Akhhaltsikhe in late January.
    Torosian, a proponent of Georgian-Armenian cooperation, reportedly warned that “Javakhk would not become another Nakhichevan,” referring to the Azerbaijani-controlled region from which all ethnic Armenians were expelled in the 19th century.
    He said that either Javakheti’s issues are addressed through Armenian-Georgian cooperation, or the current tensions could lead to an outright war. He urged immediate involvement of the Armenian government.
    The arrests were intended to “cement” Tbilisi’s control in Armenian-populated territories in the aftermath of Georgian reversals in South Ossetia and Abkhazia last August, Vahe Sargsian of the Yerevan-based Mitq analytical center suggested on January 26.
    On Aug 29, 2008 F. William Engdahl, the author of A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order (Pluto Press), and Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation (www.globalresearch.ca), and a contributing writer of Online Journal wrote: “An examination shows 41-year-old Mikheil Saakashvili to be a ruthless and corrupt totalitarian who is tied to not only the US- NATO establishment, but also to the Israeli military and intelligence establishment. The famous ‘Rose Revolution’ of November 2003 that forced the aging Edouard Shevardnadze from power and swept the then 36-year-old US university graduate into power was run and financed by the US State Department, the Soros Foundations, and agencies tied to the Pentagon and US intelligence community.”
    Further bringing the controversial Georgian Pres. Saakashvili’s real persona to light, Engdahl reported: “Since coming to power in 2004 with US aid, Saakashvili has led a policy of large-scale arrests, imprisonment, torture and deepened corruption. Saakashvili has presided over the creation of a de facto one-party state, with a dummy opposition occupying a tiny portion of seats in the parliament, and this public servant is building a Ceausescu-style palace for himself on the outskirts of Tbilisi. According to the magazine, Civil Georgia (Mar. 22, 2004), until 2005, the salaries of Saakashvili and many of his ministers were reportedly paid by the NGO network of New York-based currency speculator Soros — along with the United Nations Development Program.” 

    Engdahl ominously noted that “With Russia openly backing and training the indigenous military in South Ossetia and Abkhazia to maintain Russian presence in the region, especially since the US-backed pro-NATO Saakashvili regime took power in 2004, the Caucasus is rapidly coming to resemble Spain in the Civil War from 1936-1939, where the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany and others poured money and weapons and volunteers into Spain in a devastating war that was a precursor to the Second World War.”

    Back in August 2008, by his misguided military move against Russia/South Ossetia, Saakashvili has triggered Russia’s trashing of Georgia’s army. One hopes that he does not commit a new set of political mistakes that can cause Georgia’s international isolation and further dismemberment.

    Saakashvili’s mishandling of the Georgian-Armenians’ case is among other problems faced by his embattled presidency. The leaders of around a dozen opposition parties, in a rare show of unity, issued a joint declaration on Thursday (29 January), calling on Saakashvili to quit and hold free and fair elections for president and parliament.  “Mikheil Saakashvili and his team, in their five years in power, have led the country to catastrophe,” it read.

    The Georgian authorities can ill afford to cause the West yet a new political embarrassment with another poorly devised decision igniting yet another losing war which could threaten its very existence. Obviously Georgia is over-reacting to its defeat in its war against Russia/South Ossetia by resorting to increasing judicial harassment and intensifying political repression against the Javakheti Armenians.
    The politically-driven Georgian abuse of power against its own ethnic Armenian citizens will surely augment the level of discontent not only in Georgia but also around the world and will enable the Javakheti Armenians to earn worldwide empathetic understanding for their political struggle for cultural survival.
    If Georgia continues its reprehensible policies, it will re-enforce its critics’ assertions that contrary to the Washington neo-cons’ propaganda, Georgia is not a beacon of democracy. And as such it shall pay the price by way of reduced foreign aid flowing from the United States and Europe.
    Additionally, Georgia’s membership to world bodies, including Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, should be suspended for the mistreatment of its ethnic minorities, and especially the Georgian Armenians. 

    In a Feb 3 commentary in The Daily Star of Lebanon, Joseph S. Nye, a professor at Harvard and author of “The Powers to Lead,” wrote: “”In situations where groups have difficulties living together, it may be possible to allow a degree of autonomy in the determination of internal affairs. Internal self-determination could allow degrees of cultural, economic, and political autonomy similar to that which exists in countries like Switzerland or Belgium. Where such loosening of the bonds is still not enough, it may be possible in some cases to arrange an amicable divorce, as happened when Czechoslovakia peacefully divided into two sovereign countries in 1993.”

    But will Georgia learn from Czech Republic’s and Slovakia’s wise handling of their political problem?
    Not Saakashvili’s Georgia.
    Change is needed in Tbilisi.
  • Temper tantrums

    Temper tantrums

    Temper tantrums

    Feb 5th 2009 | ANKARA
    From The Economist print edition

    A dramatic Davos walkout raises new questions about Recep Tayyip Erdogan

    WAS it premeditated? Or did Turkey’s prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, lose control? Mr Erdogan’s walkout from a debate with Israel’s president, Shimon Peres, in Davos has made him the most talked about Turkish leader since Kemal Ataturk. His audience of financiers and policy wonks was stunned. But Muslims worldwide cheered as Mr Erdogan scolded Mr Peres over Israel’s war in Gaza. “When it comes to killing, you know very well how to kill. I know well how you hit and kill children on beaches,” thundered a crimson-faced Mr Erdogan.

    The incident has led to new debate over Turkey’s strategic alliance with Israel, whether an increasingly erratic Mr Erdogan is fit to lead Turkey at all and, if so, in what direction: east or west? There is no question of Turkey walking away from NATO or the European Union, or scrapping military ties with Israel and America. Mr Erdogan’s critics say his outburst was a ploy to please voters. If so, it worked: his approval ratings have shot up. Polls suggest that 80% of Turks support Mr Erdogan’s actions. His mildly Islamist Justice and Development party will reap dividends in municipal elections on March 29th.

    Mr Erdogan’s defiance has also helped to assuage his people’s long-running feelings of humiliation and inferiority, which date back as far as the Ottoman defeat in the first world war. Many insist that Mr Erdogan’s reaction was spontaneous and utterly sincere. Turkey has assumed “moral leadership” based on Western values, opined Cengiz Candar, a liberal commentator. Mindful of the public mood, Turkey’s secular opposition leader, Deniz Baykal, grudgingly declared that his rival had done the right thing.

    Not everybody agrees, however. Mr Erdogan’s behaviour makes it less likely that Turkey can successfully mediate between Israel and Syria. His call to Barack Obama to “redefine” what terrorist means has been seen as an appeal to remove the label from Hamas. Although European and American reaction has been muted, in private officials are unhappy. “What [the Davos spat] does leave in Europe is the feeling that Mr Erdogan is unpredictable,” says a European diplomat. Mr Obama is highly unlikely now to pay Turkey an early visit.

    Mr Erdogan’s temper tantrums are not new. But they used to be reserved for his critics at home. The Davos affair, says another foreign diplomat, is further evidence of “Mr Erdogan’s conviction that the West needs Turkey more than Turkey needs it.” It is of a piece with Mr Erdogan’s threat to back out of the much-touted Nabucco pipeline to carry gas from the Caspian Sea to Europe via Turkey. In Brussels recently Mr Erdogan said that, if there were no progress on the energy chapter of Turkey’s EU accession talks then “we would of course review our position”. Meanwhile, Turkey sided with Saudi Arabia and the Vatican in opposing a UN statement suggested by the EU to call for the global decriminalisation of homosexuality.

    Mr Erdogan’s supporters argue that EU foot-dragging on Turkey’s membership bid explains why Turkey is now seeking new friends in the Middle East and beyond. Its growing regional clout is another reason why the EU should embrace Turkey. But the reverse is also true. It is because it is the sole Muslim country that is at once secular, democratic and allied with the West that Turkey commands such respect in the rest of the world. Growing numbers of Arab investors have flocked to Turkey, “because we see it as part of Europe, not the Middle East,” says an Arab banker in Istanbul.

    To retain its allure, Turkey will need to swallow its pride and make further concessions on Cyprus. The EU may suspend membership talks altogether unless Turkey meets a December 2009 deadline to open its ports to Greek-Cypriots. The hope is that Egemen Bagis, who was chosen as Turkey’s official EU negotiator in January, will remind Mr Erdogan that, at least in these talks, it is Turkey that is the supplicant not the other way round.

    Source:  Economist, Feb 5th 2009

  • CONF./CFP- The Turkic World, the Caucasus, and Iran, July 10-12, Yerevan

    CONF./CFP- The Turkic World, the Caucasus, and Iran, July 10-12, Yerevan

    International Conference
    The Turkic World, the Caucasus, and Iran: Civilisational Crossroads of
    Interactions
    July 10-12, 2009
    Yerevan, Armenia
    http://www.armacad.org/civilizationica

    The International Journal Iran and the Caucasus
    (; Brill: Leiden-Boston), the Department of
    Iranian Studies at Yerevan State University, the Makhtumquli Feraqi
    Centre for Turkic Studies at ARYA International University (Yerevan),
    the Association for the Study of Persianate Societies (Armenian
    Branch), in collaboration with the International Society for the Study
    of Iran and the Caucasus (ISSIC;
    http://www.armacad.org/iranocaucasica), Caucasian Centre for Iranian
    Studies (Yerevan), the Armenian-Turkmen Cooperation Centre “Partev”
    (Yerevan), and the Armenian Association for Academic Partnership and
    Support – ARMACAD (http://www.armacad.org/; Yerevan) are organising an
    international conference entitled “The Turkic World, the Caucasus, and
    Iran: Civilisational Crossroads of Interactions”.

    The Conference will be held on July 10-12, 2009.
    Venue: ARYA International University, Yerevan, Armenia.

    The region of civilisational interactions from Central Asia to Eastern
    Europe and from Southern Russia to Iran has been one of the focal
    geographical points in world history. The main cultural, political and
    civilisational players in this domain have been the Iranian and Turkic
    peoples, while the Caucasus and the Transcaucasian region with their
    cultural, ethnographical and linguistic uniqueness have served as a
    connecting link and an arena for wars and peaceful cohabitation.
    Though the main stress of the conference will be on cultures,
    histories (including archaeology, etc.), languages and the literatures
    of this vast area, presentations on modern political and regional
    issues, as well as the human ecology topics are also welcomed. The
    conference seeks to emphasise links between the Turkic world, the
    Caucasus, and Iran.

    Working languages – English and Russian.

    Abstracts (not to exceed 300 words) are to be submitted via the web
    form (http://www.armacad.org/civilizationica/abstracts.php) by
    February 20, 2009.  A brief biography, including contact details, is
    also to be included.

    Once your materials have been submitted, a confirmation letter will be
    returned. If you do not receive a confirmation e-mail within 7 days,
    then we have not received your materials. Only in this case, please
    contact: [email protected]

    A notification of acceptance will be sent by March 30, 2009.

    All whose abstracts are accepted for presentation at the conference
    have to send to the Conference Organising Committee 10 Euros before
    June 10 in order to ensure their participation. This amount of money
    will be reduced from the participation fee.

    Participation Fee:

    The conference participation fee is 70 Euros and a reduced rate of 35
    Euros for postgraduate students. Participants from the Caucasus and
    Central Asia will pay 35 Euros.

    For further information do not hesitate to contact:

    Dr. Khachik Gevorgyan,
    Secretary of the Organising Committee
    [email protected]

    Makhtumquli Feraqi Centre for Turkic Studies,
    Arya International University
    Shahamiryanneri street, 18/2
    Yerevan
    Armenia
    Tel: +374 (10) 44-35-85
    Fax: +374 (10) 44-23-07
    www.arya.am
    Email: [email protected]

    International Organising Committee

    Prof. Dr. Garnik Asatrian (Yerevan)
    Prof. Dr. Uwe Blaesing (Leiden)
    Prof. Dr. Ralph Kautz (Vienna)
    Prof. Dr. Vladimir Livshits (Saint Petersburg)
    Prof. Dr. Levon Zekiyan (Venice)
    Prof. Dr. Said Amir Arjomand (New York)
    Prof. Dr. Murtazali Gadjiev (Makhachkala)
    Prof. Dr. Rovshan Rahmoni (Dushanbe)
    Prof. Dr. George Sanikidze (Tbilisi)
    Dr. Gulnara Aitpaeva (Bishkek)
    Dr. Behrooz Bakhtiari (Tehran)
    Dr. Habib Borjian (New York)
    Dr. Babak Rezvani (Amsterdam)
    Dr. Mher Gyulumian (Yerevan)
    Dr. Mahmoud Joneydi Ja’fari (Tehran)
    Dr. Seyyed Said Jalali (Tehran)
    Dr. Kakajan Janbekov (Ashgabat)
    Dr. Filiz Kiral (Istanbul)
    Dr. Irina Natchkebia (Tbilisi)
    Dr. Vahram Petrosian (Yerevan)
    Dr. Tamerlan Salbiev (Vladikavkaz)
    Dr. Alexander Safarian (Yerevan)

  • Chief of Poland’s General Staff: “Nagorno Karabakh conflict can be settled only in the framework of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan”

    Chief of Poland’s General Staff: “Nagorno Karabakh conflict can be settled only in the framework of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan”

    On January 23 Azerbaijani Defense Minister Safar Abiyev received chief of the General Staff of the armed forces of Poland, general Franchishek Gagor, said the press service for the Defense Ministry of Azerbaijan.

    As is reported, the meeting was attended by Poland’s ambassador to Azerbaijan Kshishtof Krayevski. (more…)

  • Nalbandian Confirms Progress In Turkish-Armenian Talks

    Nalbandian Confirms Progress In Turkish-Armenian Talks

     

     

     

     

     

    By Ruben Meloyan

    Echoing statements by his Turkish counterpart, Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian said on Wednesday that Armenia and Turkey have come close to normalizing their historically strained relations. He also dismissed Ankara’s warnings that the new U.S. administration will set back the process if it recognizes the 1915 mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide.

    The two neighbors embarked on a dramatic rapprochement last year culminating in Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s historic September trip to Yerevan. In a series of follow-up negotiations, Nalbandian and Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan reportedly made further progress towards the establishment of diplomatic relations and the opening of the Turkish-Armenian border.

    “Turkey and Armenia have never been closer to a plan on normalizing relations,” Babacan stated late last week.

    Commenting on this statement, Nalbandian said Yerevan continues to stand for an unconditional normalization of bilateral ties. “Our position is unchanged and we expect the same approach from Turkey,” he told a news conference. “In that case, we are really very close to solving the issue. In that sense, I share Babacan’s view that we are very close to normalizing relations.”

    But he stressed that Ankara should drop its preconditions for diplomatic relations and an open border if the process is to reach a successful conclusion. A resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict acceptable to Azerbaijan has been one of those preconditions.

    Turkey also wants an end to the decades-long Armenian campaign for international recognition of the 1915 genocide. Babacan warned that U.S. President Barack Obama “will harm the process” if he honors his election campaign pledge to term the Armenian massacres a genocide once in office.

    Nalbandian disagreed with that. “If there is a genuine desire to normalize relations between Turkey and Armenia, then nothing can impede that,” he said.

    The minister also sounded a note of caution about international mediators’ stated hopes to broker a framework agreement on Nagorno-Karabakh in the first half of this year. Matthew Bryza, the U.S. co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, told RFE/RL on Tuesday that the mediators “try to have it signed in the beginning of summer.” He said the success of those efforts depends not only on the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan but public support in both countries for the proposed basic principles of a Karabakh settlement.

    “The societies will be presented with principles that have been agreed on,” said Nalbandian. “Negotiations are continuing on the basis of the principles proposed by the co-chairs, and there is no agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan.”

    “If we reach such agreements, we will come to a point where they will be presented to the publics in both Armenia and Karabakh,” he added. “And if there is popular support for them, the leadership will be able to make some decisions. But I wouldn’t set any time frames.”

    https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1599404.html

  • Mubariz Ahmedoghlu: “I do not think that US President Barack Obama will call 1915 events in Osman Turkey as an “Armenian genocide”

    Mubariz Ahmedoghlu: “I do not think that US President Barack Obama will call 1915 events in Osman Turkey as an “Armenian genocide”

    “I do not think that US President Barack Obama will call 1915 events in Ottoman Turkey as the “Armenian genocide”, considers Mubariz Ahmedoghlu, head of the Baku based Center of Political Innovations and Technologies. He said the shift of powers in the United States does not mean changes in the external political course of the United States. “Certainly, there will be some changes in the external policy of the United States, but on the whole I think these changes will make about 5-10%, that is, they will be insignificant. (more…)