Category: Asia and Pacific

  • Number of Azerbaijani citizens visiting Istanbul grows

    Number of Azerbaijani citizens visiting Istanbul grows

    Number of tourists who visited the Turkish megalopolis increased by 15%.

    61552In the first seven months of 2011, Turkey’s Istanbul saw over 84,600 Azerbaijani tournaments which is twice as high as last year’s indicators of the same period.

    According to Turkish mass media, in the said period the number of tourists who visited the Turkish megalopolis increased by 15% to settle at 4,670,000.

    Istanbul attracts tourists with its historical and cultural values.

    In the past years, the number of tourists, who prefer Turkey, is gradually growing thanks to the steps taken by the Turkish government. Today the country is seventh by the number of tourists and eighth by the profitability of the tourism sector.

    According to TurkStat, in 2010 foreign tourists brought $25bn. By the end of the year the tourism sector will bring at least $30bn to Turkey.

    via News.Az – Number of Azerbaijani citizens visiting Istanbul grows.

  • Yusuf Halacoglu: Turkey and Azerbaijan come closer as Sargsyan admits occupation

    Yusuf Halacoglu: Turkey and Azerbaijan come closer as Sargsyan admits occupation

    “The recent processes show how wrong Turkey’s policy of rapprochement with Armenia was”

    YusufHalachoqlu300310Istanbul. Mayis Alizadeh – APA. “Encouraged by some actions of the separatists in Turkey, Armenia has recently made senseless statements. But one must not forget that Turkey is not a weak country that will give way to the separatists and senseless Armenian claims,” former head of Turkish Historical Society, parliamentarian from the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), professor Yusuf Halacoglu told APA’s Turkey bureau.

    He said Armenia does not know what to do.

    “The US does not support Armenia concerning “genocide” any more, because the US needs Turkey more in order to solve the problems in the Middle East. Therefore, Armenia’s “Agri Dagh illusions” are meaningless. These processes show how wrong Turkey’s policy of rapprochement with Armenia was. Actually, these processes strengthen the relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan. Maybe it is for the better. So, let them make senseless statements. One of the major issues is that Azerbaijan should benefit from this situation. Azerbaijan should complete the development of its economy. You know that economic power of a country means its political power. In this respect, Azerbaijan, which is strengthening its economy, is on the right way. Every country, which is in danger of economic collapse, sooner or later feels the need for its neighbors. For example Greece, they sell islands. Armenia will be in worse condition. Armenia has problems with all of its neighbors with which it could establish economic relations – with the exception of Iran. There is a need to establish new joint organizations. Enhancement of the relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan is of great importance in this respect,” he said.

    via APA – Yusuf Halacoglu: Turkey and Azerbaijan come closer as Sargsyan admits occupation.

  • The rise of the dragon and its lessons for the Turks

    The rise of the dragon and its lessons for the Turks

    Historically, China has always been an important country for Turkey. The problems of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region makes Turkish-Chinese relations very sensitive, but it is also necessary to state that Turkey’s intellectuals have very little knowledge of China.

    Therefore China for Turks is not so much an ‘interesting but distant’ country as a black box important to Turkey in several distinct ways, but about which we do not really possess deep knowledge.

    At a time when the world’s center of gravity is shifting from West to East, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has topped the list of countries about which people express the most interest.

    According to several analysts, this power whose economy is rapidly increasing will become the world’s largest economy in the next quarter of a century.

    Along with the growth of its economy, Beijing has come to be mentioned as an important power to consider in military strategy and in the arms race.

    China is changing at a dizzying speed, and there is no shortage of people who claim that it is shifting the axis of world politics and may upset the existing balances.

    No matter how much China may base its external relations on a ‘world in peace’, the question of whether China might adopt a more aggressive attitude in the coming ten to twenty years has become an extremely popular topic of debate in the West.

    And, though they are not quite on this scale, the policies which China follows in Xinjiang, in the Kashmir-Jammu dispute between India and Pakistan, and in Tibet do not seem particularly conciliatory.

    Turkey remains obscure to China

    Turkey is a natural product of both Western and Eastern civilizations, and it is fairly clear that very few people here have been concerned about the rise of China. Indeed, there has been virtually no interest in the topic.

    The thing that has interested Turks most, as a consumer society, is our importation of cheap goods from China. Although in fact, our relations with China began before relations with the West, and continued for centuries as neighboring states. The struggles for territory and dynastic rights between Turks and Chinese lasted for many years and led to the construction of the Great Wall of China, the one man-made structure visible from space.

    This special relationship derived from history continues even today, even if it is not as intense as in the past. The top item on our agenda at contact points is the situation of our kinsmen in Xinjiang.

    Stick a pin into Xinjiang and it produces an immediate reaction on the streets of Istanbul and Ankara, and large crowds gather at either the Chinese Consulate or the Chinese Embassy.

    So whether or not Turkey likes it, it is obliged to concern itself with events in China. In just the same way, the Bosnian tragedy drew Ankara’s attention to the Balkans and the Chechen problem directed it to the Caucasus, and the Arab spring to the Middle East , so a similar development may be anticipated in the years ahead of us in Turkish-Chinese relations.

    Therefore China for Turks is not so much an ‘interesting but distant’ country as a black box important to Turkey in several distinct ways, but about which we do not really possess deep knowledge.

    China’s rapidly growing economy has brought with it a culture of spending, led by the newly-emerging middle classes. A class structure based on a culture of spending does not intend to be satisfied with limitations in the sphere of freedom.

    The awakening giant may hold that ‘the individual is for the society’, but this approach is now being given a serious test through the rapid growth of the economy’s influence on society.

    Oppositional political currents

    It is obvious that oppositional political currents inside China will not be resolved through the shortcut of putting them down with tanks, as happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

    If we examine the question of whether or not China will follow a second Tiananmen Square incident to its logical conclusion, we are confronted by an even bigger problem.

    What will China’s contribution be as far as values are concerned to the global order? We now know the international balance in the centers of the West which came into being in 1648 with the Westphalia system, and the systemic parameters of the values upon which it was based.

    It is generally possible to predict the approximate opinions and means of the countries of Europe, which the European Union and the United States will use to reach a settlement when new problems emerge in the world. T However it is hard to grasp how China, which now has more sway over these problems in the world system, will react. For example regarding the Arab spring, China has stayed silent or not offered any response beyond its familiar subdued policies. Regardless, it is more or less impossible to guess what China will think about it tomorrow.

    So there is great uncertainty about how opinions will be produced and what values will be defended in an international system in which China is one of the principal decision makers.

    For example, how will China perform on matters such as the expansion of democracy, human rights, the supremacy of law, and freedom of expression? The performance given on these matters so far by China does not offer us a very praiseworthy score.

    Nonetheless, the future of China concerns Turkey considerably just as it does the whole world. The picture to date is not very encouraging, but Turkey’s intellectuals are strikingly lazy when it comes to keeping up with China’s present and its past. When meetings are held to discuss China, genuine experts are in short supply. It is not just think-tanks and universities but everyone concerned with the region, starting with companies that do business with China.

    They should step up the speed of efforts to study it and ensure that it continues on a stable basis.

    The first half of the twenty-first century will see more debates on China’s growing influence on world affairs. Shifts in power on a global scale clearly concern regional actors like Turkey.

    Because like all medium-sized powers, Turkey has to study the strategies of the key actors in the global equation in order to be able to have a secure place in the system.

    China is a global power which will be costly to neglect. So without delay, Turkey should abandon its habit of regarding China as simply a player in the area of consumer products, and must start generating some expertise on the world’s awakening giant.

    (Source: The Journal of Turkish Weekly)

  • Turkey warns it may buy nuclear tech from another country if Japan doesn’t clarify stance

    Turkey warns it may buy nuclear tech from another country if Japan doesn’t clarify stance

    Turkey has recently warned that unless the Japanese government clarifies its position on exporting nuclear power plants, from the end of the month Turkey might open up discussions with other countries on buying nuclear plant technology.

    In this March 11, 2011 file photo released by Tokyo Electric Power Co., waves of tsunami come toward tanks of heavy oil for the Unit 5 of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan. (AP Photo/Tokyo Electric Power Co.)
    In this March 11, 2011 file photo released by Tokyo Electric Power Co., waves of tsunami come toward tanks of heavy oil for the Unit 5 of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan. (AP Photo/Tokyo Electric Power Co.)

    In December 2010, Japan won Turkey’s agreement to be given top priority in negotiations for a supplier as Turkey plans its first nuclear power plants. However, after the Great East Japan Earthquake in March, negotiations were frozen at the request of the Japanese side. Turkey extended the negotiations to the end of July, but it appears to hold doubts over the Japanese government’s support for nuclear technology exports after Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s comments that Japan should free itself from dependence on nuclear energy and review its exports of nuclear plant technology.

    The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) appeared unshaken by Turkey’s warning, with a high-ranking member saying, “It’s not an unusual tactic in such negotiations. We will respond calmly.”

    Behind that confidence is the view, expressed by METI minister Banri Kaieda, that similarly quake-prone Turkey “has faith in Japanese nuclear power technology” even after the March 11 earthquake.

    Additionally, a high-level executive at a nuclear power equipment maker says, “There are many countries that say they want Japan’s nuclear power plant technology.”

    METI, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) and related corporations have showed their intention to continue trying to sell nuclear technology.

    However, the Cabinet is divided. While METI minister Kaieda holds to his support for exporting Japan’s nuclear technology, Prime Minister Kan has shown his support for a review of such exports. Under such circumstances, one METI official said, “It’s understandable that Turkey would be unsettled.”

    A high-ranking official of METI’s Agency for Natural Resources and Energy will visit Turkey within the week to better grasp its position, but until the Japanese government’s position on the issue is decided, it will likely be difficult for Japan to move negotiations in a favorable direction.

    In the case of Turkey, Toshiba Corp. has been negotiating for equipment orders with the Japanese government’s support. On Toshiba’s request, Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) had been planned to provide technical knowledge. However, on July 26 TEPCO, saddled with the issue of compensation for the Fukushima nuclear disaster, emphasized that it “will not be involved with nuclear power plant exports.”

    Furthermore, on May 20 TEPCO had announced, “To reduce costs, we will not be involved with projects other than those absolutely necessary,” showing that it views itself as in no position to be expanding overseas.

    Separately, on July 14, Hitachi Ltd. secured top priority from Lithuania in negotiations for selling nuclear plant technology.

    In this photo released by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), gray smoke rises from Unit 3 of the tsunami-stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, Monday, March 21, 2011. (AP Photo/Tokyo Electric Power Co.)

    A Toshiba spokesperson said, “Unlike Lithuania, where the equipment maker negotiated directly with the other country, the Turkey case depends on Japanese government policy. Unless both governments decide on a framework, we cannot act.”

    A high-ranking executive of one equipment maker said, “We will feel out the possibility of independently negotiating with countries, without relying on the government.”

    (Mainichi Japan) July 27, 2011

    via Turkey warns it may buy nuclear tech from another country if Japan doesn’t clarify stance – The Mainichi Daily News.

  • Turkey uses fight against trafficking for political goals

    Turkey uses fight against trafficking for political goals

    68779YEREVAN. – Turkey tries to bring the issue of fight against trafficking into politics, head of Armenian police department for fight against trafficking Tigran Petrosyan told at a press conference on Friday.

    Turkey is a problematic state concerning the issue of possible cooperation between Turkey and Armenia on fight against trafficking, as there is no diplomatic relations with Turkey. The Interpol provides the only way to communicate between Armenian and Turkish law enforcement agencies.

    At present negotiations are run on transferring an Armenian citizen to Armenia through Georgian side. He is wanted for organizing trafficking.

    At the same time Turkish media spreads information that mostly does not correspond to reality. For example they say that Armenian women who are either victims of trafficking or intended prostitution were arrested. However, later, after Armenian side checks the information, it turns out that although people mentioned in publications arrived in Turkey indeed, they appeared in police not because they had something in common with trafficking or prostitution.

    via Turkey uses fight against trafficking for political goals – Armenian police | Armenia News – NEWS.am.

  • Armenia Ready, Target 2015

    Armenia Ready, Target 2015

    Turkish foreign policy recently intensified its attention on the Arab Spring, carrying out extensive diplomatic efforts to secure an immediate resolution for the turmoil in the region. (more…)