Category: Asia and Pacific

  • Turkish Minister of Energy and Natural Resources says no electricity agreement signed with Armenia

    Turkish Minister of Energy and Natural Resources says no electricity agreement signed with Armenia

     [ 11 Sep 2008 16:05 ]

    Ankara–APA. Turkey’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Hilmi Guler said they had not signed any agreement to purchase electric energy from Armenia. Guler said some private companies negotiated this issue with Armenia, but no documents were signed, APA quotes the Turkish news agencies.

    Armenia’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisyan said they would sell electric energy to Turkey beginning from 2009. He said during President Abdullah Gul’s visit to Armenia they had signed agreement about the export of electricity from Armenia to Turkey via Gars.

  • Armenia to Supply Electricity to Turkey

    Armenia to Supply Electricity to Turkey

     

     

     

     

     

    By Ruben Meloyan

    A senior government official has confirmed that Armenia will start exporting electricity to neighboring Turkey by the end of this year.

    Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisian told RFE/RL on Thursday that an agreement on that had been reached “at the high level” and that he expects no “political obstacles” to the project that he says will be of a long-term nature.

    The announcement of the deal came days after the first-ever visit of a Turkish head of state to Armenia. While in Yerevan last Saturday Turkey’s President Abdullah Gul and his Armenian counterpart Serzh Sarkisian discussed possibilities of normalizing bilateral ties between the two countries with historically strained relations.

    Representatives of the UNIT Company engaged in importation and distribution of high-voltage electricity in Turkey also reportedly attended the visit of President Gul to Yerevan.

    Minister Movsisian said Armenia’s energy infrastructure is mostly ready to start supplying electricity to Turkey but added that some work still needs to be done by the Turkish party before the deliveries can begin.

    “The lines on our side are mainly ready. We only have to do an overall check. The Turkish party has asked for four months to complete their part of the work, after which we will start electricity supplies for a few days experimentally and then on a regular basis,” Movsisian said, adding that electricity supplies are expected to be on a year-round basis rather than have a seasonal nature.

    “It is a long-term and quite a serious program,” Movsisian said. “I can not say what part of Turkey will the imported electricity be used for, but since Turkey experiences a shortage of electricity, the volume of supply will be quite sizable, and I think it will tremendously ease their problems.”

    According to Movsisian, the price of supplied electricity will be economically effective and will depend on thermal energy and gas prices. According to current estimates, it may make 5.7 cents per kilowatt.

    Armenian Nuclear Power Plant Director-General Gagik Markosian also considers the deal to be lucrative.

    “I think it is very lucrative as an energy project. As all know, Armenia has a lot of untapped capacities and this potential that we have is not being used either,” Markosian said. “We have stations, specialists, personnel. And in all cases, exporting electricity is a very profitable deal for Armenia.”

    The nuclear station in Metsamor currently produces an average of 2.5 billion kilowatt per hour of electricity a year, according to its head manager.

    Markosian says the preliminarily agreed volume of annual electric power supplies to Turkey estimated at 1.5 billion kilowatt/hour with a possibility to grow up to 3.5 billion is a “very serious figure.”

  • Nabucco Gets A Boost In Baku

    Nabucco Gets A Boost In Baku

    September 10, 2008
    By Bruce Pannier

     

    Turkey’s Hilmi Guler (left) says his country backs Nabucco.

    Western hopes for Caspian gas that doesn’t arrive via Russia are alive and well.

    The future of the Nabucco natural-gas pipeline project have appeared to be in serious jeopardy since war broke out between Russia and Georgia.

    Some export routes leading to the planned pipeline would run through Georgia, where Russian forces remain entrenched in unilaterally declared buffer zones nearly a month after an EU-brokered cease-fire.

    Of course, Nabucco’s viability also hinges to some extent on gas supplies from Caspian countries Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan, all of whom have been courted by Russia’s Gazprom, which recently offered to purchase all of the three countries’ gas.

    But at a “strategic-cooperation conference” in Baku this week, there was broad support for participation in the Nabucco project.

    “Azerbaijan is not giving up on the Nabucco project,” Azerbaijani Industry and Energy Minister Natiq Aliyev vowed. “This is a project that has a future.”

    Turkish Energy Minister Hilmi Guler also seized on the opportunity to pledge his country’s support for Nabucco. “Nabucco will work. We will implement it,” he said. “The Nabucco project will strengthen not only Turkey’s energy security, but Europe’s too. No one should doubt it.”

    The Nabucco plan calls for a 3,300-kilometer pipeline that will transport 31 billion cubic meters of gas to Europe every year once it is fully operational.

    Crucially for Western backers like the European Union and the United States, Nabucco’s route avoids both Russian and Iranian territory entirely.

    Importance Of Diversity

    “The cooperation between these two countries [Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan] and others such as Kazakhstan to create a diversity of export possibilities helps ensure each country’s independence and economic strength,” said U.S. special representative to the EU Boyden Gray, who was at the Baku conference.

    “In addition, there is strength in numbers and in cooperation. These countries in this region are stronger and more influential acting in concert than individually,” he added. “This is especially the case given the closed nature of the Caspian. If they are united on energy issues, these countries can better promote diversification and competition for their exports and, also, over the long haul promote the diversification of their economies through expanded regional and world trade.”

    Gray noted that the United States will not benefit directly from Nabucco but that Washington hoped “that the [Caspian] region and Europe both benefit and that we, as a trading nation, will also indirectly benefit and we very much want for [Europe] to have a strong independent existence to promote your own economies to their fullest potential.”

    Despite having no “direct” interest in the Nabucco project, the United States has been engaged in substantial lobbying for the project in the Caspian region. U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney was in Azerbaijan last week to promote diversification of energy export routes.

    The Nabucco pipeline itself would start from the Georgian-Turkish and/or Turkish-Iranian borders and run to Austria. Nabucco project head Reinhard Mitschek told RFE/RL earlier this year that Nabucco does not contract for gas supplies, it is only an energy import route for Europe. It is up to shareholders in the project and other companies to arrange the purchase of gas and feed it into the Nabucco pipeline.

    But without gas from Caspian countries such as Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan it could be difficult to fill the pipeline, so the participation of those countries in Nabucco is vital.

    Enough Gas?

    The progress in Baku does not yet mean that Nabucco’s problems are all settled. Charles Esser, an energy analyst with the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, points out that Azerbaijan’s participation alone does not remove all the obstacles to Nabucco.

    “The Azeri minister was tentative in his support because he said certainly Nabucco is still on track, he said, though, that ‘we in Azerbaijan don’t have enough gas to, by ourselves, supply [Nabucco] so it will require other sources.’ [Without other sources] he was doubtful that [Nabucco] would happen,” Esser says.

    Turkmen officials at the Baku conference have not yet said what level of participation, if any, Turkmenistan would have in Nabucco. Furthermore, Turkmenistan has committed itself to pumping more gas to Russia and China in recent weeks. And Esser notes that the Russia-Georgia conflict is still fresh in the minds of many and will play a role in how Nabucco fares in the coming weeks.

    “I think there’s a renewed political push for Nabucco; however, at the same time I think commercial risk has increased,” Esser says. “There is no way around it and because of that risk investors will want guarantees. I think we’ll have to see whether the increased political will for Nabucco translates into guarantees and perhaps subsidies.”

    Nabucco is planning to hold a meeting of shareholders, potential investors, and potential suppliers in Budapest next month to discuss the pipeline project’s future.

    RFE/RL Azerbaijani Service Director Kenan Aliyev contributed to this report

  • Greece in urgent need of 1 bln m3 of natural gas: BHMA

    Greece in urgent need of 1 bln m3 of natural gas: BHMA

    11 September 2008 | 15:04 | FOCUS News Agency

    Athens. Greece finds itself in an urgent need of 1 billion cubic meters of gas, Greek BHMA newspaper writes.
    The newspaper states that Turkey turns to be the big obstacle for the natural gas supply from Azerbaijan to Greece. According to diplomatic sources, the recent visit of Greece’s Minister of Development Christos Folias to Baku assured that Azerbaijan is ready to sell 3 billion cubic meters of gas by 2010 but pointed at the difficulties caused by Ankara. The key that opens the gas.

    Source: www.focus-fen.net, 11 September 2008

  • Armenia Inclined to Free Azerbaijan’s Lands: Turkish President

    Armenia Inclined to Free Azerbaijan’s Lands: Turkish President

    Azerbaijan, Baku, 11 September/ TrendNews/ President of Turkey Abdullah Gul has stated that Armenia is inclined to free occupied lands of Azerbaijan, Dunya bulteni news agency of Turkey reported.

    Abdullah Gul said to journalists after his visit to Baku that Armenia is inclined to free occupied lands of Azerbaijan and that Sarkisyan understands significance of resolution of Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.

    “Armenia is inclined to free occupied lands of Azerbaijan. I witnessed it during my meeting with Sarkisyan,” Gul said.

    Gul said he believes Russia also has a positive attitude toward the resolution Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. “I think Russia also wants Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict to be solved. Because Russia will not accept its isolation in the region,” he added.

    Source: news.trendaz.com, 11.09.08

  • Anwar Ibrahim: rise after the fall

    Anwar Ibrahim: rise after the fall

    The leader of Malaysia’s resurgent opposition has declared that he will take power on September 16

    Anwar has said he will claim power by September 16. Photograph: Ahmad Yusni/EPA

    The Malaysian government has tried its utmost to keep Anwar Ibrahim, the leader of Malaysia’s resurgent opposition, from power ever since he fell out of favour a decade ago.

    In the late 1990s, Anwar looked set to take over from Mahathir Mohamad, who guided Malaysia over 22 years to economic success. But mentor and protege had a bitter falling out over Malaysia’s response to the Asian economic crisis in July 1997.

    Mahathir favoured currency and foreign investment controls. Anwar, who was then deputy prime minister and finance minister, implemented an austerity programme that slashed government spending and deferred infrastructure projects dear to Mahathir.

    The rift became irreparable, when Anwar — named by Newsweek as man of the year in 1998 — went on a campaign against corruption and cronyism that rankled many of the elite, including Mahathir’s son, Mirzan who had myriad business dealings.

    In 1998, Anwar was accused of sodomising his wife’s driver, convicted in 2000 and sentenced to nine years in prison amid widespread international protests. Anwar remains grateful to the British prime minister, Gordon Brown, among others who pleaded his cause and in 2004 Malaysia’s supreme court overturned the verdict, although corruption charges against him stood. He was released later that year but was barred from standing for office until April this year.

    Following his release, Anwar held teaching posts at Oxford University and Georgetown University in Washington and pursued his campaign against corruption through his post as honorary president of AccountAbility, a London thinktank advocating better corporate governance.

    In his capacity as a campaigner against corruption, Anwar strongly criticised Britain’s decision to halt a major corruption investigation into BAE, Britain’s biggest arms company, in its dealings with Saudi Arabia. What signal did that send leaders in developing countries, he argued, as he submitted a letter to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development that was scathing of the government’s decision.

    Even as he spoke out against international corruption, Anwar was plotting a political comeback. In an interview early last year he said was getting round his ban on speaking at public forms by addressing the public at funerals and feasts. He made it clear that he was ready to challenge the Malaysian political elite that sacked and imprisoned him.

    “I am committed to a reform agenda, I believe in a democratic process and a more accountable government,” he said then. “I can’t reasonably expect this to happen without political involvement. If I chose to submit, then I would give credence to the government and support their repressive measures.”

    It was not just brave talk. First he helped the disparate opposition parties make huge inroads in parliamentary elections in March. The Barisan Nasional, a coalition of three racially based parties led by the United Malays National Organisation (Umno) that has dominated Malaysian politics since independence from Britain in 1957, saw its two-thirds majority evaporate. By contrast, the opposition parties saw their seats in the 222-member parliament jump to 82 from 19.

    Anwar’s march back to power seemed unstoppable when he easily won a seat that he had previously held for 17 years. Out of the blue came new sodomy charges, when a 23-year-old aide, Saiful Bukhari Azlan, accused Anwar of sodomising him, a charge that a prison sentence of 20 years in Malaysia, even between consenting adults.

    Despite the accusations, which he maintains are a transparent attempt to stop his political comeback, Anwar has raised the stakes by declaring that he will take power on September 16, Malaysian national day, by persuading enough government MPs to defect to the opposition. The government was rattled enough to send 50 MPs on a trip to Taiwan due to last more than a week to forestall such a move.

    As the government goes into political contortions to keep Anwar at bay, the opposition leader says he can get the 30 MPs he needs to bring down the government. If — and it remains a big if as the ruling party will do all it can to cling on to power — Anwar finally gets to lead Malaysia, what will this multi-racial country look like?

    Raja Petra Kamarudin, fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, wrote on Malaysia Today, a website the Malaysian government is trying unsuccessfully to block: “Anwar has to balance the aims of the parties in his coalition, and we will see compromises being made. That is the reality in Malaysia. But I think a culture of dialogue will be developed under his watch and that will be a great achievement indeed. I think at least that can be accomplished by him.”

    Like Turkey, another Muslim country with its interplay of democracy and Islam, Malaysia will be closely watched to see how it copes with forces for change. Anwar firmly rejects the notion that Malaysia’s “democratic deficit” has anything to with the fact that it is Muslim.

    “The newly independent Muslim states were democracies,” Anwar said. “Indonesia had a free election in 1955 until it was hijacked by Sukarno. Iran had democratic elections only to be hijacked by the CIA, British intelligence and the oil companies. Seventy five to 80% of Muslims are familiar with the democratic process.”

    Source: www.guardian.co.uk, September 10 2008