Category: Asia and Pacific

  • Free world allies fought for South Korea during war

    Free world allies fought for South Korea during war

    Free World Allies
    Turkish troops arrive in the southeastern port city of Busan in 1950 to join the Korean War. Some 21 countries took part in the conflict. / Korea Times file

    UNC waged crusade against communism

    By Andrew Salmon

    On 29 August, 1950, a bright summer day, a startlingly alien sound blasted across Busan docks: A series of flatulent drones followed by a piercing wail.

    The sound was emanating from a group of young men pacing the gun turrets of an approaching heavy cruiser. Their appearance was even more bizarre: They were clad in skirts and chequered, tasseled headgear. The cacophonous lilt emanated from sack-like objects the men were plying.

    The objects were bagpipes; the men were Scottish troops of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders, the lead battalion of 27th British Brigade. At an urgent American request, and in response to the deteriorating military situation, this unit had been dispatched. post-haste, from Hong Kong with such speed that they dubbed themselves the “For-God’s-sake-send-something Brigade.”

    27th Brigade were just the first of the non-American contingents to arrive in Busan to help stem Kim Il-sung’s invasion. On the embattled peninsula, a new concept in world affairs was being born: A United Nations military intervention force, or, to give it its formal title in Korea, the United Nations Command, or UNC.

    This was the force enabled by UN Security Council resolutions of 25th and 27th June and 7th July 1950 calling for the “restoration of international peace and security in the area” following Pyonyang’s 25th June invasion. Several contingents, however, would not land until 1951, by which time the South had been saved, the North defeated and counter-invaded – and then the entire situation reversed by the Chinese intervention at the end of 1950.

    Under the U.N. banner, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Columbia, Ethiopia, France, Greece, India (Field Ambulance), Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Philippines, the United Kingdom, Thailand and Turkey supplied ground combat troops, while South Africa deployed its “Flying Cheetah” fighter squadron. Denmark, Italy, Norway and Sweden provided non-combatant medical units.

    The United States commanded this polyglot force, and, after South Korea, provided its main muscle, contributing seven infantry division and a marine division, as well as logistical support, and the largest naval and air units. In July 1953, a survey showed that South Korea had 590,911 troops in the UNC; the US, 302,482; and other U.N. contingents totaled only 39,145.

    Most of the non-American UNC contingents were small. Once the war entered its static stage in late 1951, the Australian, British, Canadian, Indian and New Zealand units fought together, but the Commonwealth Division was the only unit in the UNC that was operationally independent. Turkey provided a brigade, but all other contingents ― except for little Luxembourg’s, which was a platoon fighting within the Belgian battalion ― were battalion-sized and were absorbed into American parent formations.

    The cosmopolitan expansion of the coalition defending South Korea provided the U.S.-run logistics chain with a range of problems. While the U.S. Army was dry, the Dutch wanted gin, the French wine, and the Australians, Belgians and British, beer to fight on. On the rationing front, the Turks would not eat pork and like the Dutch, demanded fresh bread. The Greeks wanted figs, raisins and olive oil.

    Yet, while these UNC units might cause cultural, linguistic and logistical headaches for U.S. commanders, and while they did not compare in size with the Americans, many of them proved to be exceptionally high quality fighting units. This was particularly so in the first six months of the war when, by comparison, the U.S. Army was suffering significant morale and leadership problems.

    The Turks forged a legend in their first action. Sent to hold the flank of the U.S. 2nd Infantry Division, disintegrating under Chinese onslaught at the end of November 1950, the ferocity with which they employed their bayonets earned them global fame. At the same time, they took massive casualties, partly due to linguistic problems and poor liaison with American forces.

    The French battalion proved a lynchpin at Chipyong-ni, a battle of encirclement in February 1951 that was widely considered the first UNC tactical victory against the onrushing Chinese.

    At the heart of the greatest enemy offensive of the war in April 1951, stood the British 29th Brigade, which earned global attention for its tragic stand on the Imjin River. On the opposite end of the front, the Australian and Canadian battalions of 27th Commonwealth Brigade won plaudits for their masterly defensive battle at Kapyong during the same Chinese offensive.

    The fighting quality of the Commonwealth Division would be evident in the key ground they were assigned to once the war entered its static stage: Flanking the U.S. Marine division, generally considered the best of the U.S. ground units, along the Samichon Valley, at the northern end of the so-called “Uijongbu Corridor” the traditional invasion route to Seoul.

    The Belgians were noted for their enthusiastic professionalism, and the Greeks for their excellence in mountain warfare.

    What compelled such a disparate group of nations to fight for a country that very few of their citizens had even heard of before 25 June 1950?

    Although the ostensible causus belli was the defense of South Korea, Rhee Syngman’s government – a regime of questionable democratic credentials, and one which operated, in the view of many UNC men, with comparable brutality to Kim Il-sung’s – hardly made a compelling case for intervention.

    There were, instead, three main reasons. National desires to win the goodwill of Washington; national suspicions of militant communism; and a more general desire to support the efforts of the then-fledgling, but promising, U.N.

    For the U.K., which fielded the second-largest contingent, it was a fight to stem global communism, but the country was also under pressure to maintain its “special relationship” with the U.S. France, heavily engaged in Indochina, needed to earn American goodwill for aid in that struggle. It is fair to say that all the northern European contingents felt a debt of honor toward the U.S. after World War II, and the Greeks had even more recent reasons to thank the U.S. for its assistance in winning the Greek Civil War.

    Two units that UNC officers were careful not to deploy alongside one another were the traditional enemies of southern Europe, the Greeks and the Turks. Ankara was keen to cement ties with Washington, in order to gain membership in NATO; ironically, Athens shared the same motive.

    After the armistice was signed in July 1953, this international legion, a force as polyglot as any since the Crusades, dispersed. Australian and British veterans headed for a less intense anti-communist struggle in the jungles of Malaya, but for one contingent, the end of the Korean War spelled disaster. The French battalion was assigned to Indochina, where Paris’ position was deteriorating. The much-admired battalion was wiped out by Viet Minh forces in 1954.

    Some who fought under the U.N. banner in Korea were disappointed at the organization’s less effectual role thereafter. The original U.N. resolutions that had underwritten the UNC’s existence had been made possible by the absence of the USSR’s envoy to the body, Josef Malik, who was boycotting the body in summer of 1950 (due to the U.N.’s refusal to grant a seat to communist China).

    Once Moscow rejoined the world body and Cold War politics began affecting its operation, it became difficult to employ U.N. forces on anything other than “peacekeeping” missions — many of questionable effectiveness. It would not be until the end of the Cold War, and the U.N. intervention in the Gulf War of 1991, that the U.N. would again field a military force with real teeth.

    Sixty years later, the leading nation in the UNC, the United States, is still South Korea’s most important political ally, but it is fair to say that the trade and commercial links forged between Seoul and other UNC capitals have fallen in importance since the end of the Cold War. Then-enemy China, for example, has replaced the United States as Korea’s top trade partner.

    Still, emotional ties endure: South Korea and Turkey, for example, displayed a mutual affection during their World Cup semifinal match in 2002 that was born in the war years and after, when Turkish troops founded the “Ankara” orphanage.

    The peninsula had seen international contingents fighting on its soil before. Kublai Khan’s multi-ethnic legions used Korea as a staging area for their doomed invasions of Japan in the 13th century, and Japanese, Manchu, White Russian, Chinese and Soviet troops would all leave blood on Korean soil in succeeding centuries.

    But the UNC troops of 1950 made up of the most cosmopolitan army the peninsula had ever hosted; their ethnic and national diversity would not be witnessed again in Korea until the 1988 Summer Olympics. For modern Korea, the internationalization of its fight for survival in late 1950 was the first, if unacknowledged, step in a process that few South Koreans would start talking about until the early 1990s: Globalization.

    andrewcsalmon@yahoo.co.uk

    http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2010/09/117_73312.html, 19/09/2010

  • Ready, set — wait. . . India not ready for Commonwealth Games yet

    Ready, set — wait. . . India not ready for Commonwealth Games yet

    The sporting event is set to start Oct. 3 in New Delhi, but preparations are running behind, with new stadiums unfinished and financial irregularities reportedly rampant.

    By Mark Magnier

    Reporting from New Delhi — About the only thing beating expectations ahead of the Commonwealth Games here is the mosquito population, helpfully delivering a dengue fever epidemic that is expected to peak just in time for the opening ceremony early next month.

    The mosquito-borne illness has struck more than 7,000 people across India, including two top cyclists. (The 7,000 athletes and team officials who are about to descend on New Delhi might want to pack some bug spray: Their village is in a prime mosquito breeding area along the fetid Yamuna River. Unusually heavy monsoon rains have worsened the situation)

    When India won the bid in 2003 to host one of the world’s biggest sporting events, boosters said it would propel New Delhi into the ranks of Tokyo, New York and other world-class cities. Others, mindful that a certain faster-developing Asian neighbor successfully hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics, saw it as a practice run in “shining India’s” bid for the 2020 Olympics.

    With the Games opening in less than three weeks, there’s more tarnish than shine amid reports of massive budget overruns, rampant alleged corruption, shoddy workmanship, poor planning, weak accountability and bureaucratic infighting.

    The lead-up to the event has been a litany of unfinished stadiums, collapsed roofs and caved-in roads — some resurfaced more than once after someone forgot to lay sewer and power lines first.

    At least one official has compared the preparations to a big Bollywood wedding in which, after the initial pandemonium, everything comes together for a happy ending.

    But even the most blushing of brides wouldn’t forget the caterers: Despite seven years to prepare, the contract to feed many of the athletes, coaches and support staff was awarded only late last month, with organizers forced to have the specialized equipment needed to prepare hundreds of thousands of meals shipped by air at an added cost of $7.5 million.

    At least seven “final” deadlines have been blown, and construction at venues and related urban-renewal projects is woefully behind. The latest deadline was Sept. 15. But Connaught Place, the city’s showcase shopping district, remains a maze of trenches and debris, prompting one newspaper to dub it “Chaos Place.”

    “Even if the [prime minister] starts wiping the floor, the venues won’t be ready for the Games,” said opposition politician and Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi, who called the event preparation a “debacle.”

    Reports of financial irregularities have also dogged preparations in a nation rated 84th on watchdog Transparency International’s corruption perception index of 180 countries — one novelist termed the Games a “lootfest” — including $85 toilet paper dispensers, $19,500 rented treadmills, $130 wastebaskets, and questionable consulting and real estate deals. The original $133-million administrative budget could reach $516 million, not counting more than $6 billion spent on stadiums and upgrading the capital.

    “The obvious issue of corruption has tainted the whole thing,” said Boria Majumdar, coauthor of the book “Sellotape Legacy” about the Oct. 3-14 Games. “This was supposed to be a portrayal of ‘India shining.’ What a disappointment.”

    As near-daily disclosures of alleged irregularities surfaced in August, Sonia Gandhi, leader of the ruling Congress Party, announced that a full investigation would be held, but only after the Games.

    Those in charge have denied wrongdoing and defended their oversight. “It is normal for every Games to have some charges or the other,” said Suresh Kalmadi, head of the organizing committee.

    With political careers, and India’s reputation, at stake, there’s a lot riding on the Games, the third-largest multidisciplinary sporting event after the Olympics and the Asian Games, a 1930s legacy of British colonialism born amid concern that the United States was dominating the Olympics.

    “We are on track,” Kalmadi told foreign reporters recently. “Leaving aside some minor glitches, the infrastructure are in place and they are world class.”

    Most cities hosting big events have last-minute problems, and New Delhi has had a particularly heavy monsoon season this year, further delaying construction.

    But some say the bigger problem is man-made as weak oversight undermined coordination in India’s legendary bureaucracy. When India successfully hosted the 1982 Asian Games, then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi took personal charge.

    Awarded the Commonwealth Games in 2003, India didn’t form an organizing committee until 2005, and construction, enmeshed in legal challenges, didn’t begin in earnest until 2007. The committee resisted outside expertise, contending it was too expensive, even as a 2009 report warned that 20 of 34 basic requirements for successful Games were deficient.

    New Delhi has received good marks for its security arrangements, even as one humorous Hindustan Times column suggested that Islamic extremists might be flummoxed by all the unfinished construction. “Setting off bombs inside your vest will take more than a little skill when you are five feet deep in mud and cement,” it said.

    In an eleventh-hour bid to hit reset, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh late last month appointed 10 top officials to assume greater oversight, although some observers fear it could be too little.

    “It’s like trying to save a cancer patient at the end, rather than catching it early,” said Novy Kapadia, a sports commentator. “Unfortunately, not meeting the deadlines will make a lot of stereotypes come out, that Indians are lazy, not efficient. India’s reputation is taking a massive beating.”

    Local enthusiasm remains weak, with more than 70% of residents surveyed saying the expense was unjustified. Ticket and merchandise sales started only in late August, and sponsors, foreign visitors, dignitaries and headline athletes are shying away as broadcasting revenues fall well below projections.

    The shoddy construction, meanwhile, has some wondering what lasting legacy the Games will leave beyond a new subway, an airport terminal and some highway overpasses.

    “There’s been so much focus on pomp and glitter in the obsession with being a global city, when what we need is drainage, sewers, basic health issues,” said Gautam Bhatia, an architect. “Without the budget for maintenance, I’m afraid the stadiums will fall apart.”

    Although many are still hoping for a last-minute miracle, the growing list of problems has some questioning the wedding analogy. As an editorial in the business newspaper Mint put it, “This is turning out to be a wedding that will make prospective in-laws think twice about India.”

    mark.magnier@latimes.com

    Anshul Rana in The Times’ New Delhi Bureau contributed to this report.

    , September 17, 2010

  • Weeks out, India’s Commonwealth Games in crisis

    Weeks out, India’s Commonwealth Games in crisis

    forbes home logoBy RAVI NESSMAN

    NEW DELHI —

    The sporting event which India hoped would herald its emergence as a regional power and serve as a springboard to an Olympic bid has instead turned into a chaotic mess.

    Less than seven weeks before New Delhi is to host to the Commonwealth Games, venues are still under construction, top officials have been forced out in scandal, costs have soared and many are questioning the wisdom of spending so much money on an event in a nation riddled with social ills.

    To make matters worse, many top athletes, including Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt, pulled out and even Queen Elizabeth II has said she won’t come to the Games, which brings together the 71 countries of the Commonwealth, or former British Empire.

    After China showcased its economic clout during an impressive Beijing Olympics, India’s Commonwealth Games organizers were under pressure to deliver a comparable spectacle to promote “India Rising.”

    Instead, the bungling of the preparations for this second-tier sports event has highlighted the government corruption and malaise that continues to plague the nation, said Harsh V. Pant, a political analyst.

    “When it comes to implementation, I don’t think India has moved an inch from where we used to be,” he said.

    Hoping to stem the cascade of problems, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh stepped in last weekend, ordering a corruption probe and appointing a group of Cabinet ministers to oversee the final preparations and try to salvage the event.

    The move came as criticism of the Games, to be held in New Delhi from Oct. 3-14, reached fever pitch, with everything from traffic jams to mosquito breeding blamed on preparations.

    The Times of India newspaper showed Shera, the Games’ jaunty, cartoon tiger mascot, on a respirator, and a former sports minister publicly hoped the Games would collapse in disarray so India would not be tempted to bid for future events.

    Delhi’s chief minister, Sheila Dikshit, called the broadsides “unpatriotic.”

    “I plead with people to look at the better side of the Games – the rest will fall into place,” she told The Sunday Express newspaper.

    But the problems are hard to ignore.

    Venues that were supposed to be completed last year to allow for test events, are still in what officials promise is the final phase of construction.

    Workers are still building the corrugated tin roof at the new weightlifting arena, which partially collapsed after springing a leak during recent monsoon rains.

    The Shivaji stadium in central Delhi, which is to be used as a practice field for hockey teams, has been stripped down, its facade left with gaping holes as hundreds of workers navigated large piles of red bricks, gray concrete blocks and rusting reinforcing rods.

    A 4-kilometer-long 4 (2.5-mile-long) road-bridge connecting the athletes village to the main stadium has gaps in it.

    “We have to accept where we are and look forward,” said Mike Hooper, the CEO of the Commonwealth Games Federation, who is in New Delhi helping oversee the preparations. “Everyone’s got a lot of work to do, and that’s what they’ve got to focus on.”

    Much of central Delhi remains torn up by projects that had been intended to beautify the city for the 100,000 foreign tourists the Games committee had anticipated. Many of the projects are so far behind schedule they are being covered up, to be worked on again after the event.

    And there are doubts the tourists are even coming.

    Hotels that expected to be sold out have received only anemic bookings for the Games and regular tourists seem to be deferring travel during what would usually be high season to avoid the spectacle, said Rajindera Kumar, president of Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India.

    “The response is so weak,” he said. “I’m really fearing for the industry.”

    The cost of hosting the Games – which the government initially pegged at less than $100 million in 2003 – has skyrocketed, with estimates ranging from $3 billion to more than $10 billion.

    A recent report by a government watchdog said contractors were charging unreasonable rates, producing shoddy work and fabricating tests to show the quality of their construction was up to standards.

    Meanwhile, ticket sales have been delayed, sponsorships have not met expectations and over the weekend the official merchandiser pulled out, saying delays in launching his products were costing him unbearable losses. On Thursday, two power companies announced they were canceling their multimillion dollar sponsorship deals with the event.

    Three top officials were fired this month over alleged financial irregularities with the London launching of the Queen’s Baton Relay – a monthslong odyssey akin to the Olympic torch relay. That came a week after the organizing committee’s treasurer resigned amid accusations his son’s firm was given a contract to help build the tennis courts.

    As part of a drive to clean up the city ahead of the event, the government demolished thousands of slum homes and arrested homeless people and beggars, according to a coalition of human rights groups.

    At the venue sites, construction workers earned just half the minimum wage, were not given helmets, gloves or other safety gear and worked in conditions so dangerous that 42 of them were killed in accidents, the group said.

    “Even if the games are a success, even if we are miraculously able to pull out a successful games, the negative social legacy is going to be with us for years to come,” said Miloon Kothari, director of the Housing and Land Rights Network, one of the groups in the coalition.

    Sonia Gandhi, head of the ruling Congress Party, said Thursday that all the allegations would be investigated after the closing ceremony. In the meantime, she called on Indians to unite behind the Games, the biggest sporting event to be held here since the 1982 Asian Games.

    “The prestige of the nation is involved,” she said.

    But the event has turned into an embarrassment for a country that should be focusing instead on fixing its medical and education system and dealing with the hundreds of millions mired in poverty, said Rajan Singh, 29, a software engineer.

    “With a developing country like India, we need to invest in other infrastructure,” he said. “Once that is complete, we can go for Games like this.”

    , 20.08..20rica10

  • Azerbaijan to invest $5bn in Turkey

    Azerbaijan to invest $5bn in Turkey

    Natiq AliyevAzerbaijani state companies are planning to invest some $5bn in Turkey in the next two to three years, a minister has said.

    “The investments of Azerbaijani state companies in Turkey top $3bn today. In the coming two to three years our state companies are planning investments of $5bn in the Turkish economy, not to mention investment from the private sector,” Azerbaijan’s minister of industry and energy, Natig Aliyev, told a conference in Baku today.

    Azerbaijan invests in Turkish energy projects in particular, with state oil company SOCAR holding the majority of shares in Turkey’s petrochemical giant, Petkim

    Natig Aliyev told the international conference, entitled the Azerbaijani Model of Economic Development, that Azerbaijani companies were actively investing in Georgia too. He said that Azerbaijan met 90% of Georgia’s needs for gas and Azerbaijan’s state company, SOCAR, was modernizing the gas distribution network in Georgia.

    Natig Aliyev also said that Azerbaijan was working to increase oil and gas production.

    Economic Development Minister Shahin Mustafayev told the conference that Azerbaijan had become the region’s economic power house, accounting for 75% of the total gross domestic product (GDP) of the three South Caucasus states.

    “In Azerbaijan, the years of reform by late President Heydar Aliyev and current President Ilham Aliyev have created a liberal and independent economy, relying on its own resources and integrated into the global economy,” Mustafayev said.

    He said that Azerbaijan’s status was reflected in the country’s international credit rating and in global assessments on the ease of doing business.

    Interfax-Azerbaijan, Fineko/ABC

    , 17 September 2010

  • Turkic summit in Turkey concludes with declaration

    Turkic summit in Turkey concludes with declaration

    5 TurkThe 10th Summit of Heads of State of Turkish Speaking Countries in Istanbul ended after signing of a declaration.

    The 10th Summit of Heads of State of Turkish Speaking Countries in Istanbul ended after signing of a declaration.

    President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan, President Nursultan Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan’s interim President Roza Otunbaeva and Turkmenistan’s President Gurbanguli Berdimuhammedov were in attendance at the summit hosted by Turkish President Abdullah Gul.

    During the summit, the leaders agreed to appoint Turkish diplomat Halil Akinci as the first Secretary-General of the Secretariat who would officially assume his responsibilities following the entering into force of the Nakhchivan Agreement.

    During last year’s summit in Nakhchivan on October 3, 2009, the leaders signed an agreement about establishment of the Council of Cooperation of Turkish Speaking States.

    The headquarters of the Council will take place in Istanbul.

    The leaders also decided to celebrate the signing day (3 October) of the Nakhchivan agreement as the Turkish Speaking States Cooperation Day.

    They confirmed the importance of putting into practice the initiative aiming at establishment of a special foundation for support of Turkish culture and preservation of Turkish heritage in Baku in order to preserve the rich Turkish cultural heritage.

    The leaders stated that they would promote the establishment of a union among universities to support the studies of the Turkish Academy in Astana.

    They decided to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the independence of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan in 2011 through joint activities.

    Accordingly, they welcomed the proposal of Turkmenistan to organize a Turkish Speaking States cultural festival in Ashkhabad in 2011.

    The leaders also expressed their satisfaction about the successful completion of the referendum in Kyrgyzstan on June 27, 2010. Highlighting importance of the parliamentary elections on October 10 for regional peace and stability, they confirmed that they would continue to support Kyrgyzstan during this transitional period.

    The leaders invited international community to actively participate in the International Donor Conference for assistance to Kyrgyzstan to be organized by Kazakhstan in Almaty.

    They expressed their deep regret over the raid of Israel to the humanitarian aid convoy sailing in international waters on May 31, 2010, causing the death of nine innocent civilians.

    The leaders emphasized the importance of the settlement of the disagreement concerning the nuclear programme of Iran through dialogue and diplomacy for regional and global peace and stability.

    The leaders also agreed to establish Turkish Speaking States Business Council in order to foster economic cooperation and decided to explore the possibility of the establishment of the ‘Turkic Speaking States’ Development Bank’ in Istanbul and a joint Insurance Company in order to support development of non-oil sectors and create new opportunities for private sector.

    The first summit of Turkish Speaking Countries Cooperation Council will be held in Kazakhstan in 2011 and Kyrgyzistan will host the second summit in 2012.

    AA

  • Blair postpones book party at Tate Modern

    Blair postpones book party at Tate Modern

    (Reuters) – Former premier Tony Blair has postponed a party at the Tate Modern art gallery celebrating the launch of his autobiography because of threats from protesters, his office said on Wednesday.

    Anti-war demonstrators had planned to disrupt the reception on Wednesday evening and a group of celebrated artists including Tracey Emin and Vivienne Westwood had called on the gallery to cancel the “disgraceful” event.

    Blair has also been forced to cancel a signing session for “A Journey” at a bookstore in central London.

    “It has been postponed for the same reason as the book signing,” a spokesman for Blair said.

    “We don’t want to put our guests through the unpleasant consequences of the actions of demonstrators.”

    At the weekend, protestors hurled eggs and shoes at the former prime minister during a promotional event in Dublin.

    Blair, prime minister for Labour between 1997 and 2007, led Britain into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In particular, the occupation of Iraq by Western coalition forces was widely opposed and contributed to a dive in Blair’s popularity.

    Emin, Westwood and musician Brian Eno, were among figures from the arts world who wrote a letter to the Guardian newspaper on Wednesday to voice their concern about the Tate Modern event.

    “It is disgraceful that the Tate is being used for this purpose,” they said.

    (Reporting by Matt Falloon; Editing by Steve Addison)

    The Reuters