Category: Asia and Pacific

  • Dialogue Bridge Between Malatya and Yerevan

    Dialogue Bridge Between Malatya and Yerevan

    golden apricotAfter the new political steps of Turkish government to Armenia, some Anatolian cities started to act on government’s way. At Akhdamar Ceremony, we witnessed possibility of tolerance and friendship situation among us. Thousands of people visited Van for joining to religious ceremony. Turkish Armenians and Armenians from Armenia lived in a different atmosphere in Van. Turkish people shared Turkish hospitality for visitors. Armenian visitors stayed a few days in Van and they understood that states should have done normalisation process two years ago. Political approaches are not efficient. Mainly, people can be successful to create a dialogue bridge between Turkey and Armenia.

    Akhdamar Ceremony ended and it has been first step to new age for neighbors. People of Van created good conditions and a newspaper which is called Van Times published Armenian pages for this important day. There was no any provocation against to joiners. But some groups declared their ideas against to this ceremony with saying that it was a political game of Turkish government to be member of European Union. Armenian authorities could give directions people to support this peace process. Leader of Turkish Armenian Patriarchate, Tatul Anushyan criticized Echmiadzin and other opponent Armenian authorities. Anushyan says that “This ambiance is very important. I would have wanted to see other people who are against to this ceremony. We’ll realize peace with these initiatives” Responsible reverend Drtad Uzunyan says that “I can’t express my feelings, this is an enormous happening to be here after 95 years. Thanks to Turkish state and government” We can not be pioneers under this political atmosphere. Two sides should have responsibilities without same political feelings. Turkish government has a big vision about this issue. Armenia should trust in Turkey and come together with this country. President of the Chamber of Industry and Trade in Van, Zahir Kandashoglu defended importance of free trade with Armenia. He promised to employ 50.000 people if borders will be opened.

    Today we witness a new peaceful approach of Malatya. Carmuzu Tepebasi Mosque Foundation decided to restore historical Tashoron Armenian Church which is situated in Hrant Dink’s street in Malatya. It is a very important circumstance. It shares a great tolerance of Islamic idea. A foundation of mosque restores an Armenian church. Also we expect same sensitivity from Yerevan to save Turkish and Islamic historical buildings in Armenia. Also another happening is important. Yerevan complained about symbol of Malatya’s International Film Festival. Because Malatya uses Golden Apricot emblem for this festival. Armenia has used Golden Apricot symbol for many years at its film festival. Authorities in Yerevan declared to not use it by Malatya. Governor of Malatya, Ulvi Saran says thay “ I couldn’t understand approaches of Yerevan. Apricot is a natural symbol of Malatya. Also %75 production of apricot is provided by Malatya. Yerevan can be our  partner about this subject. We can create new works under the name of Golden Apricot with Yerevan, it is possible”

                Demand of Ulvi Saran is very important to realize a peace bridge. I think Malatya and Yerevan can be pioneers for normalisation process between Turkey and Armenia. Yerevan should create committes to share cultural values in Malatya like a festival. Also Malatya can do it in Nor-Malatia, Yerevan. We are ready for cooperation. In some sources I learned that Atom Egoyan who is chief of Armenian Golden Apricot Film Festival, is from Arapkir. His grandfather went to another region from Arapkir. Today this region is within Malatya. Also it can be a common value between states. We have too many tools for establishing this bridge. Are we ready?

    Mehmet Fatih ÖZTARSU – Aravot Newspaper

    Armenian version was published for Aravot Newspaper / Armenia

  • Iran opens airspace to China warplanes

    Iran opens airspace to China warplanes

    china+iranThe Islamic Republic of Iran has reportedly opened its airspace to Chinese warplanes taking part in joint military maneuvers with Turkey.

    Ankara and Beijing conducted the drills in Turkey’s Central Anatolia region last month.

    The war games, codenamed the Anatolian Eagle, were the first involving Turkey and China. Turkey had previously carried out Anatolian Eagle maneuvers with the US and other NATO members as well as Israel.

    Turkish F-16, Chinese Su-27 and Mig-29 fighter jets took part in mock dogfights during the drills.

    The maneuvers come ahead of a planned visit by Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao to Turkey.

    Turkey and China took their first step in military cooperation in the late 1990s with joint missile production, manufacturing weapons with a 150-kilometer range, the Hurriyet daily reported on its website.

    The multinational Anatolian Eagle exercise is hosted by the Turkish Air Forces and is aimed at boosting aerial cooperation and training. The exercises have been performed since June 2001.

    NN/HGH/MMN

    , Oct 3, 2010

  • Turkish speaking countries declare Oct 3 as day of coop

    Turkish speaking countries declare Oct 3 as day of coop

    TSC CoopTurkey’s Foreign Ministry said on Sunday that October 3 was declared as the day of cooperation among Turkish speaking countries.

    Turkey’s Foreign Ministry said on Sunday that October 3 was declared as the day of cooperation among Turkish speaking countries.

    A ministry statement said the anniversary of signature of the Nakhichevan Agreement on establishment of Cooperation Council of Turkish Speaking Countries would from now on be celebrated as the “Day of Cooperation Among Turkish Speaking Countries”.

    “This day will be marked with comprehensive activities in coming years,” the statement said.

    On October 3, 2009, heads of state of Turkish speaking countries, including Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan held their ninth summit in Nakhichevan and signed the Nakhichevan Agreement.

    Heads of state of the same countries met in Istanbul on September 16, 2010 for their tenth summit and decided to celebrate October 3 as the “Day of Cooperation Among Turkish Speaking Countries.”

    The first meeting of the Turkish Cooperation Council Summit will take place in Kazakhstan in 2011 and the second will be in Kyrgyzstan in 2012.

    “Turkey believes a synergy that will contribute to peace, stability and welfare in Eurasia will ocur as the historical experiences of the Turkish nation unite with today’s vision of Turkic states, and the Cooperation Council of Turkish Speaking Countries will strengthen regional cooperation mechanisms,” the statement also said.

    AA

  • Turkey and Russia Defy America’s Imperial Design in the Middle East and Central Asia

    Turkey and Russia Defy America’s Imperial Design in the Middle East and Central Asia

    by Eric Walberg
     
    Global Research, October 1, 2010
    Al-Ahram Weekly

    The new Ottomans and the new Byzantines are poised for an intercept as the US stumbles in the current Great Game.

    The neocon plan to transform the Middle East and Central Asia into a pliant client of the US empire and its only-democracy-in-the-Middle-East is now facing a very different playing field. Not only are the wars against the Palestinians, Afghans and Iraqis floundering, but they have set in motion unforeseen moves by all the regional players.

    The empire faces a resurgent Turkey, heir to the Ottomans, who governed a largely peaceful Middle East for half a millennium. As part of a dynamic diplomatic outreach under the Justice and Development Party (AKP), Turkey re-established the Caliphate visa-free tradition with Albania, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya and Syria last year. In February Turkish Culture and Tourism Minister Ertugrul Gunay offered to do likewise with Egypt. There is “a great new plan of creating a Middle East Union as a regional equivalent of the European Union” with Turkey, fresh from a resounding constitutional referendum win by the AKP, writes Israel Shamir.

    Turkey also established a strategic partnership with Russia during the past two years, with a visa-free regime and ambitious trade and investment plans (denominated in rubles and lira), including the construction of new pipelines and nuclear energy facilities.

    Just as Turkey is heir to the Ottomans, Russia is heir to the Byzantines, who ruled a largely peaceful Middle East for close to a millennium before the Turks. Together, Russia and Turkey have far more justification as Middle Eastern “hegemons” than the British-American 20th century usurpers, and they are doing something about it.

    In a delicious irony, invasions by the US and Israel in the Middle East and Eurasia have not cowed the countries affected, but emboldened them to work together, creating the basis for a new alignment of forces, including Russia, Turkey, Syria and Iran.

    Syria, Turkey and Iran are united not only by tradition, faith, resistance to US-Israeli plans, but by their common need to fight Kurdish separatists, who have been supported by both the US and Israel. Their economic cooperation is growing by leaps and bounds. Adding Russia to the mix constitutes a like-minded, strong regional force encompassing the full socio-political spectrum, from Sunni and Shia Muslim, Christian, even Jewish, to secular traditions.

    This is the natural regional geopolitical logic, not the artificial one imposed over the past 150 years by the British and now US empires. Just as the Crusaders came to wreak havoc a millennium ago, forcing locals to unite to expel the invaders, so today’s Crusaders have set in motion the forces of their own demise.

    Turkey’s bold move with Brazil to defuse the West’s stand-off with Iran caught the world’s imagination in May. Its defiance of Israel after the Israeli attack on the Peace Flotilla trying to break the siege of Gaza in June made it the darling of the Arab world.

    Russia has its own, less spectacular contributions to these, the most burning issues in the Middle East today. There are problems for Russia. Its crippled economy and weakened military give it pause in anything that might provoke the world superpower. Its elites are divided on how far to pursuit accommodation with the US. The tragedies of Afghanistan and Chechnya and fears arising from the impasse in most of the “stans” continue to plague Russia’s relations with the Muslim Middle East.

    Since the departure of Soviet forces from Egypt in 1972, Russia has not officially had a strong presence in the Middle East. Since the mid- 1980s, it saw a million-odd Russians emigrate to Israel, who like immigrants anywhere, are anxious to prove their devotion and are on the whole unwilling to give up land in any two-state solution for Palestine. As Anatol Sharansky quipped to Bill Clinton after he emigrated, “I come from one of the biggest countries in the world to one of the smallest. You want me to cut it in half. No, thank you.” Russia now has its very own well-funded Israel Lobby; many Russians are dual Israeli citizens, enjoying a visa-free regime with Israel.

    Then there is Russia’s equivocal stance on the stand-off between the West and Iran. Russia cooperates with Iran on nuclear energy, but has concerns about Iran’s nuclear intentions, supporting Security Council sanctions and cancelling the S-300 missile deal it signed with Iran in 2005. It is also increasing its support for US efforts in Afghanistan. Many commentators conclude that these are signs that the Russian leadership under President Dmitri Medvedev is caving in to Washington, backtracking on the more anti-imperial policy of Putin. “They showed that they are not reliable,” criticised Iranian Defence Minister Ahmad Vahidi.

    Russia is fence-sitting on this tricky dilemma. It is also siding, so far, with the US and the EU in refusing to include Turkey and Brazil in the negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme. “The Non-Aligned countries in general, and Iran in particular, have interpreted the Russian vote as the will on the part of a great power to prevent emerging powers from attaining the energy independence they need for their economic development. And it will be difficult to make them forget this Russian faux pas,” argues Thierry Meyssan at voltairenet.org.

    Whatever the truth is there, the cooperation with Iran and now Turkey, Syria and Egypt on developing peaceful nuclear power, and the recent agreement to sell Syria advanced P-800 cruise missiles show Russia is hardly the plaything of the US and Israel in Middle East issues. Israel is furious over the missile sale to Syria, and last week threatened to sell “strategic, tie-breaking weapons” to “areas of strategic importance” to Russia in revenge. On both Iran and Syria, Russia’s moves suggest it is trying to calm volatile situations that could explode.

    There are other reasons to see Russia as a possible Middle East powerbroker. The millions of Russian Jews who moved to Israel are not necessarily a Lieberman-like Achilles Heel for Russia. A third of them are scornfully dismissed as not sufficiently kosher and could be a serious problem for a state that is founded solely on racial purity. Many have returned to Russia or managed to move on to greener pastures. Already, such prominent rightwing politicians as Moshe Arens, political patron of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, are considering a one-state solution. Perhaps these Russian immigrants will produce a Frederik de Klerk to re-enact the dismantling of South African apartheid.

    Russia holds another intriguing key to peace in the Middle East. Zionism from the start was a secular socialist movement, with religious conservative Jews strongly opposed, a situation that continues even today, despite the defection of many under blandishments from the likes of Ben Gurion and Netanyahu. Like the Palestinians, True Torah Jews don’t recognise the “Jewish state”.

    But wait! There is a legitimate Jewish state, a secular one set up in 1928 in Birobidjan Russia, in accordance with Soviet secular nationalities policies. There is nothing stopping Israeli Jews, orthodox and secular alike, from moving to this Jewish homeland, blessed with abundant raw materials, Golda Meir’s “a land without a people for a people without a land”. It has taken on a new lease on life since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Russian President Dmitri Medvedev made an unprecedented visit this summer, the first ever of a Russian (or Soviet) leader and pointed out the strong Russian state support it has as a Jewish homeland where Yiddish, the secular language of European Jews (not sacred Hebrew), is the state language.

    There has been no magic hand guiding Turkey and Russia as they form the axis of a new political formation. Rather it is the resilience of Islam in the face of Western onslaught, plus — surprisingly — a page from the history of Soviet secular national self-determination. Turkey, once the “sick man of Europe”, is now “the only healthy man of Europe”, Turkish President Abdullah Gul was told at the UN Millennium Goals Summit last week, positioning it along with the Russian, and friends Iranian and Syrian to clean up the mess created by the British empire and its “democratic” offspring, the US and Israel.

    While US and Israeli strategists continue to pore over mad schemes to invade Iran, Russian and Turkish leaders plan to increase trade and development in the Middle East, including nuclear power. From a Middle Eastern point of view, Russia’s eagerness to build power stations in Iran, Turkey, Syria and Egypt shows a desire to help accelerate the economic development that Westerners have long denied the Middle East — other than Israel — for so long. This includes Lebanon where Stroitransgaz and Gazprom will transit Syrian gas until Beirut can overcome Israeli-imposed obstacles to the exploitation of its large reserves offshore.

    Russia in its own way, like its ally Turkey, has placed itself as a go-between in the most urgent problems facing the Middle East — Palestine and Iran. “Peace in the Middle East holds the key to a peaceful and stable future in the world,” Gul told the UN Millennium Goals Summit — in English. The world now watches to see if their efforts will bear fruit.

    Eric Walberg writes for Al-Ahram Weekly http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/ You can reach him at http://ericwalberg.com

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/turkey-and-russia-defy-america-s-imperial-design-in-the-middle-east-and-central-asia/21273

  • Turkish, Chinese air forces secretly participated in military drill

    Turkish, Chinese air forces secretly participated in military drill

    Turkey conducted war games with China.

    TR CNThe Turkish and Chinese air forces secretly participated in a military drill in Konya as part of the “Anatolian Eagle” war games, prompting a reaction from Washington, daily Taraf reported Thursday.
    Taraf based its report on Turkish and Western military sources, who confirmed that the military drills took place but did not state the exact dates of the games or what kind of aircraft were involved.
    Washington has requested information on the matter from Turkey, the report added.
    Last year, Ankara excluded Israel from the war games, reportedly because of political tension that arose with Tel Aviv after the Israeli-led war in Gaza in January 2009.
    The Turkish government decided to freeze all military exercises with Israel in response to the killing by Israeli commandos of nine people on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla in May. Last year, Ankara excluded Tel Aviv from the same exercise, which prompted fellow NATO members the United States and Italy to withdraw from the drills. Turkey had to conduct the exercise on a national instead of an international level.
    Since the early 2000s, Turkey, a NATO member, has conducted war games in the central Anatolian province of Konya with other members of the alliance or non-member friendly nations. But this year was the first time a military drill was conducted with China.
    The US administration reportedly contacted the Turkish foreign and defense ministries and asked why the drill was conducted and what kind of maneuvers were practiced.

    http://news.az/articles/turkey/23775, 01 October 2010

  • What Cyprus tells us about Turkey

    What Cyprus tells us about Turkey

    By David Kenner

    trncresized

    Cypriot President Dimitris Christofias gave Foreign Policy an interview earlier this week, where he offered an eloquent explanation of the factors that have conspired to leave his country his country divided [sic.], even after 36 years of diplomacy. But his answer to why the average U.S. citizen — or even the average diplomat in Foggy Bottom — should care about Cyprus’s plight was rather unsatisfying. “The United States of America is a bastion of freedom and human rights, isn’t it?” he said. “I call upon the Americans to respect the Cypriots as they respect themselves.”

    That’s true, of course. Human rights are inalienable and universal, and if the approximately 1 million Cypriots are forced to live in a bifurcated nation, and the quarter million citizens of northern Cyprus exist in a state of international isolation, that’s an issue that deserves our concern. We should also be concerned with the treatment of the Uighur population in China, the work of Cambodia’s international tribunal, and the ongoing chaos in the Congo. In a world of finite resources, however, concern doesn’t necessarily translate into the United States spending time and money to resolve a problem.

    However, there is a good reason that the United States should be paying active attention to the progress, or lack thereof, in resolving the Cyprus dispute. It just has less to do with the plight of Cypriots themselves, and more to do with the fate of Christofias’s primary rival: Turkey. The Turkish government, which is increasingly throwing its weight around in the Middle East, still refuses to recognize the Republic of Cyprus or let its vessels dock in Turkish ports. Cyprus, as a full member of the European Union, can be expected to continue to block Turkey’s EU accession bid until a resolution is reached. The fear is that, if Prime Minister Erdogan’s government finds its path blocked to the West, it will increasingly drift into the orbit of Iran and Syria.

    Indeed, the lack of progress on the Cyprus issue is just one instance of how Erdogan’s ambitious foreign policy has been unable to resolve issues closer to its borders. While Erdogan travels the globe blasting Israel for its policy toward Gaza or mediating the dispute over Iran’s nuclear program, his diplomats have also made little progress in normalizing relations with Armenia; efforts to resolve the increasingly violent conflict with Turkey’s Kurdish population have also stalled. Issues like Cyprus, Armenia, and Kurdish integration might not command the international spotlight in the same way as Iran and Israel can, but they are arguably more important for Turkey’s long-term well being.

    ,October 1, 2010