Category: Asia and Pacific

  • One-sided thinking on Gallipoli an injustice

    One-sided thinking on Gallipoli an injustice

    John MonashMartin Flanagan

    LEGENDS are like earthquakes. They happen. Afterwards, we try to understand the forces that created them. Anzac is an Australian legend that has a roughly analogous place to the Civil War in the American psyche. Both are stories of young nations encountering the horrors of modern warfare for the first time – that is, wars fought with repeating rifles and machineguns and appalling casualty rates. Both conflicts represent massive and unprecedented change.

    As popular culture, however, what the Civil War has that Anzac doesn’t is the view of both sides. In 1983, when his yacht, Australia 2, won the America’s Cup, owner Alan Bond acknowledged that at one stage his crew had been losing but added “it was just like Gallipoli, and we won that one”.
    It would be interesting to know exactly how that comment was received in lounge rooms across Australia. Did it feel “right” to most who heard it? My guess is that it did.
    Gallipoli was a military disaster. We should note that in justice to the young men who died there. Do we owe them less than we owe those who die in bushfires like Black Saturday? We should also note it in justice to future generations. The voices that urged Australia into the invasion of Iraq were of the same character as those that propelled Australia to Gallipoli in 1914. In the context of Anzac, we also need to note the extent of the debacle to appreciate the stature of the major Australian characters who emerged from it – like, for example, General Sir John Monash.
    The planning at Gallipoli was a farce. Six weeks before the landing, by way of military intelligence, the British officer commanding the operation, General Sir Ian Hamilton, was equipped with two small guidebooks on Turkey and a text book on the Turkish army. Ellis Ashmead Bartlett, an English journalist covering the campaign who correctly foresaw from the outset that it was doomed, said intelligence would be acquired “at the point of a bayonet”. And it was.
    Monash was an engineer. Born in West Melbourne to Jewish German immigrants, Monash was of the century just beginning, a man who understood steel and concrete and modern automation. His battles were meticulously planned. The British prime minister Lloyd George described Monash “as the most resourceful general in the whole of the British Army”. Monash is a giant figure in Australian history.
    Propaganda was involved in shaping the popular view of Gallipoli from the start. Take the case of John Simpson Kirkpatrick, the man with the donkey. Within six weeks of his death, he had been conscripted into the propaganda war, a newspaper report describing him as ”a six-foot Australian” with ”a woman’s hands” who said in a British-Australian accent, ”I’ll take this fellow next.”
    Simmo was a five-foot-eight Geordie with a stoker’s hands who spoke in dialect and had fierce Labor politics. His first biographer, a fan of Churchill and acquaintance of Sir Robert Menzies, stripped him of his politics. There was no mention of boozing or fighting. The real Simmo was left in a grave at Gallipoli.
    What the Australians won at Gallipoli was huge respect, including from their enemy. It really is time we started making clear to young Australians that the Anzacs didn’t die protecting Australia from being invaded. Rather, we were invading a country on the other side of the world – to wit, Turkey – with whom we had no difference as a people outside the larger politics of the day.
    Surely it is time we owed Turkey, and Turkish Australians, that respect. Look at the respect Turkey shows our dead.
    I ask this question most seriously. Does any country in the world – other than Turkey – permit a people who tried to invade it to commemorate the fact of that attempted invasion on their shores each year? I know of not a single one. Imagine if the descendants of the Japanese pilots who bombed Darwin held an emotional service beneath the Japanese flag on the shores of Darwin Harbour each year.
    My impression is that within Turkey the legend of Anzac got absorbed into the legend of Ataturk, the so-called father of modern Turkey, who, as a young man, championed the Turkish defence at Gallipoli.
    It was Ataturk who declared to the mothers of Australia that their sons lay in friendly soil. A group of about 80 Turkish Australians march each year in Melbourne on Anzac Day. Anzac Day would not be the same without them.
    Martin Flanagan is a senior writer.

    April 24, 2010

  • Turkey’s preconditions unacceptable, Armenian Premier says

    Turkey’s preconditions unacceptable, Armenian Premier says

    Tigran SargsyanArmenia adopted a foreign policy to normalize relations with its neighbors, Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan stated at the meeting with students at Ural federal University. “We are ready to normalize relations without preconditions with all our neighbors, unlike them,” he said.

    Prime Minister recalled Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan’s initiative to normalize relations without preconditions, but the reconciliation failed because of Turkey. “When the Armenia-Turkey Protocols were signed, Armenia submitted the documents for ratification in the Parliament. Turkey failed to do it and stepped back, setting the issue of Armenian Genocide and Karabakh conflict resolution as preconditions for rapprochement. The preconditions are unacceptable for Armenia,” Sargsyan underscored.

    As to the international recognition of Armenian Genocide, the Prime Minister said activities are conducted to raise public awareness in this direction. Armenian public institutions take effective measures worldwide. Today there are dozens of states, which legally recognized Armenian Genocide under Ottoman Empire. We attach significance to the international recognition of 1915 mass killings of Armenians to present a real picture of Turkey to the world, its history and consequences,” Sargsyan emphasized.

    via Turkey’s preconditions unacceptable, Armenian Premier says | Armenia News – NEWS.am.

  • “Open Armenia-Turkey border” group created on Facebook

    “Open Armenia-Turkey border” group created on Facebook

    A couple of days ago, “Open Armenia-Turkey border” group appeared on Facebook social network. As of October 19, 450 people have joined the group.

    Judging by the posted photos on the page, it may be concluded, “Strong Turkey” Party (GTP) launched the e-campaign. This political force became known in Armenia after its leaders informed of their crossing Armenia-Turkey border. Later, Russian Border Service in Armenia refuted the information, saying nobody crossed the border.  Photo albums “A visit to Armenia,” “Ruins of Ani,” “Crossing the border” are posted on the page. The party leaders are in photos.

    It is clear the moderators of the page keep track on the comments and quickly delete those on Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Empire.

    Artur Stepanyan noticed the deletion of his comment after making comment on Armenian Genocide. A few minutes later, the Armenian’s comment was deleted.

    https://news.am/eng/news/35174.html, October 20, 2010

  • Turkey Analysis: Is Ankara Now in a “Radical Axis of Evil”? (No.)

    Turkey Analysis: Is Ankara Now in a “Radical Axis of Evil”? (No.)

    Ali Yenidunya in EA Middle East and Turkey

    turkish airforce

    Our question for today: is Turkey still a pro-Western country looking forward to entering the European Union. Or has Ankara, “unfortunately, joined the radical axis formed led by Iran and supported by Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah”.

    Let’s start with a statement by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu on 11 October:

    We also had wonderful, friendly relations with another country, with military cooperation, with full diplomatic relations, with visits by heads of state, with 400,000 Israeli visitors to that country. That country is called Turkey.

    What prompts Netanyahu to use the past tense? Is it because Turkey ejected Israel from a planned international air force exercise or because Turkey and Syria held joint military exercises in late April? Is it because Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told off Israeli Prseident Shimon Peres over Israel’s bloody war in Gaza in World Economic Forum in Davos in January 2009 or because Turkey did not stop the Freedom Flotilla which tried to break the Gaza siege?

    Is it because Turkey conditionally accepted NATO’s planned anti-missile system, saying that  it should not be presented as a defence against Iran? (On Friday, Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said: “We do not perceive any threat from any neighbour countries and we do not think ouur neighbors form a threat to NATO.”) Or is it because of a joint Turkish-Chinese air-force exercise held two weeks ago?

    If I may offer an alternative to the “radical axis” thesis at this point….

    Ankara’s new foreign policy under the Justice and Development Party is not a revisionist manoeuvre but a reflection of its rising autonomy due amidst Washington’s decreasing power — from Afghanistan to Pakistan to Iraq to the rest of the Middle East — coupled with regional powers taking more initiative, economically and politically. Ankara, like its regional neighbours, wants to get benefit from this international conjuncture.

    And in order to become a stronger regional power, Ankara had to give up its discourse based on antagonism towards its neighbours (no need even to mention the need to solve its Armenian, Kurdish and ecumenical Greek Orthodox problems). The next step was to increase trade, boost bilateral relationships, build trust with old enemies, and raise your credibility with statements showing you are standing with the “weak”. Erdogan did this for Gazans and for Uighur Turks in northwest China. (How fast do we forget that Erdogan blamed a Chinese official of committing a “a near genocide” after the killing of 184 people last year in the conflict?)

    Some other facts: Turkey signed eight new trade agreements with China in early October, bypassing the US dollar for direct business between the Turkish Lira and Yuan. The goal is to achieve a trade volume of $100 billion in ten years from the current amount of $17 billion. As for the “existential threat” of Iran, the trade volume between Iran and Turkey was $1.4 billion in 2000 but it was $8 billion in 2008. (And of this, only $236 million in 2000 were Turkish exports; by 2007, the figure was $1.3 billion.) Turkey is now carrying out around 14 to 15% of its trade with its neighbours as opposed to 3 to 4% in the previous decade.

    As a champion of privatisation, Turkey is still a relatively “liberal” — perhaps neo-liberal — country, both economically and politically. This is still the same Ankara trying to be a part of European Union, following the adjustment of domestic law to the harmonization code of the EU in 2001 and in 2004. That is not to say Ankara is doing a great job fulfilling all of the democratic criteria to become a member state of the EU, but it has a pro-Western identity.

    I call my closing witness. Who would like to see a stronger Turkey (with reduced tension with Israel, of course) that has close relationships and is diplomatically and economically capable of holding negotiations with Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, and Pakistan?

    Talking to BBC’s “Record Europe”, US Foreign Secretary Hillary Clinton said: “Turkey is becoming a greater global and regional power. Its economy is growing dramatically. They are extending to countries and try to be effective on their own as well as with us.”

    Increasingly autonomous? Yes. Radically evil? No.

    Article originally appeared on EA WorldView (http://www.enduringamerica.com/).

  • Chinese, Turkish scholars discuss bilateral cooperation

    Chinese, Turkish scholars discuss bilateral cooperation

    ANKARA, Oct. 18 (Xinhua) — Chinese and Turkish scholars gathered at a political forum in the Turkish capital of Ankara on Monday to discuss their economic ties, cooperation in the Middle East and coordination within the Group of 20 (G20).

    Wang Zhongwei, deputy director of China’s State Council Information Office which sponsors the forum, said China and Turkey, both G20 members and emerging economies, share interests in such major issues as reforming international financial system and tackling climate change.

    “We should further coordinate and cooperate in those issues. That’s in the interests of the two countries’ people and benefits regional and world peace and stability,” Wang said in an opening speech.

    Fatih Ceylan, deputy undersecretariat of the Turkish Foreign Ministry, said China and Turkey hold similar views on many regional and international issues and have great potential for better cooperation.

    As a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council, Turkey has worked together with China very well in issues related to Afghanistan, the Palestinians and Iran, he said.

    Wang Zhongwei (2nd R), deputy director of China's State Council Information Office, Chinese Middle East envoy Wu Sike (1st L), Fatih Ceylan (2nd L), deputy undersecretariat of the Turkish Foreign Ministry, attend a political forum, a part of a large-scale cultural event termed "Experience China in Turkey", in Ankara, Turkey, Oct. 18, 2010. (Xinhua/Zheng Jinfa)
    Wang Zhongwei (2nd R), deputy director of China's State Council Information Office, Chinese Middle East envoy Wu Sike (1st L), Fatih Ceylan (2nd L), deputy undersecretariat of the Turkish Foreign Ministry, attend a political forum, a part of a large-scale cultural event termed "Experience China in Turkey", in Ankara, Turkey, Oct. 18, 2010. (Xinhua/Zheng Jinfa)

    Zhang Yuyan, a scholar with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, suggested China and Turkey uphold the principle of ” common but differentiated responsibility” on climate change and strive to increase the representation and voice of developing countries in international institutions.

    Kamer Kasim, vice president of Turkey’s International Strategic Research Organization, said it’s good for both China and Turkey to increase cooperation in security, energy, tourism and other areas.

    The forum was a part of a large-scale cultural event termed ” Experience China in Turkey”, which was held in Ankara and the Turkish city of Istanbul.

    The event, starting on Sunday and to last till the end of the month, covers nine major activities, including Chinese-Turkish political and economic forums, Chinese movie and television weeks, Chinese cuisine festival and exchanges between journalists and writers.

  • U.S. expects “more propitious time” for Armenia-Turkey agenda

    U.S. expects “more propitious time” for Armenia-Turkey agenda

    by Emil Sanamyan

    Published: Monday October 18, 2010

    Washington – Washington remains committed to normalization of relations between Armenia and Turkey but is also waiting for more “propitious time” to revisit that agenda, a senior U.S. official indicated.

    In response to a question from The Armenian Reporter if the Armenia-Turkey relations have lost their urgency for the United States, Assistant Secretary of State Philip Gordon indicated in so many words that they have.

    “On Turkey-Armenia we remain committed to the process of normalization,” Mr. Gordon said in his October 18 talk at Johns Hopkins University. “We want to see both countries ratify and implement the protocols.”

    He added, “that hasn’t happened and we regret that, but the protocols continue to exist, they were signed. May be we can find more propitious time to revisit this agenda.”

    Philip Gordon briefing reporters. State Dept.
    Philip Gordon briefing reporters. State Dept.

    U.S. became actively involved in Armenia-Turkey talks as the new Administration came into office with strong pledges by Barack Obama to recognize the Armenian Genocide and as congressional leadership appeared poised to move a resolution recognizing the Genocide forward.

    At the time, Mr. Gordon and other U.S. officials called for normalization of relations to be achieved within a “reasonable timeframe” without a linkage to the Karabakh conflict.

    Since President Obama backtracked on his pledge and indicated opposition to the resolution, Turkey has also backed off its earlier promises to normalize relations with Armenia by establishing diplomatic relations and lifting its embargoes.

    In his October 18 remarks Mr. Gordon also indicated that U.S. “commitment” to Armenia-Turkey reconciliation proceeded in parallel with U.S. efforts to achieve a “reconciliation” between Armenia and Azerbaijan through the Karabakh peace process.

    Speaking earlier it the day at the American Turkish Council’s annual conference Mr. Gordon and Turkey’s Undersecretary of Foreign Affairs Feridun Sinirlioglu did not touch on Armenia-Turkey relations as they discussed other pressing concerns, such as Turkey’s position on U.S.-led sanctions against Iran and recent tensions with Israel.

    Joining that discussion were ex-Congressman Robert Wexler and regional experts Ian Lesser and Omer Taspinar.

    While Mr. Wexler sought to downplay U.S.-Turkish differences and highlight Israel’s importance to Turkey, the two experts sounded less upbeat about U.S.-Turkey relations going forward.

    In his comments Mr. Taspinar also referred to Turkey’s failure to deliver on its promises regarding Armenia as adding to State Department’s concerns about Turkey’s course.

    (c) 2010 Armenian Reporter