Category: East Asia & Pacific

  • General: China Could Be Planning Surprise Missile Attack on United States

    General: China Could Be Planning Surprise Missile Attack on United States

    Is China Planning a Surprise Missile Attack?

    Gordon G. Chang

    china.red army

    A retired Chinese general recently revealed that his country might be planning a surprise missile attack on the United States. The public comment of Xu Guangyu came in response to WikiLeaks revelations that last year Washington had warned its allies beforehand of China’s test of a missile interceptor.

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in a classified cable sent last January 9th, instructed American embassies in Australia, Britain, Canada, and New Zealand to notify those countries of upcoming Chinese launches two days later. The cable included details of the launch sites for the interceptor and the target, the models of the missiles, the purpose of the test, and the test date.

    Yesterday, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post carried comments from Xu, now at the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association, to the effect that American satellites would have detected activity at the launch sites but that some of the information in the cables—specifically the types of missiles and the day of the test—must have come from a source on the ground. WikiLeaks’s release of this cable, revealing one or more American spies in China’s strategic missile corps, is perhaps the website’s most significant compromise of US security to date.

    The Hong Kong paper noted that Xu said that “if China could no longer keep secret its missile launches, it would not be able to launch a surprise attack on the US.”

    Is China really in the process of planning to destroy the American homeland with a preemptive barrage of nuclear-tipped missiles? Xu’s comment, of course, is not proof, but it does reveal that Chinese flag officers are thinking about doing so.

    Unfortunately, Xu’s hostile sentiment fits within a worrisome trend.  Especially since the beginning of last year, there has been a series of belligerent comments from China’s generals, admirals, and colonels, some talking about war with the US in the near future. Last February, for instance, Colonel Meng Xianging said the People’s Liberation Army would “qualitatively upgrade” its capabilities to force a showdown on US policy toward Taiwan within the decade “when we’re strong enough for a hand-to-hand fight with the US.”

    Given the belicose statements coming from some of China’s military brass—along with China’s well-documented aggressive behavior in the South China Sea and other peripheral waters—it is difficult to imagine how Western observers can deny China’s intentions and the clashes that lie ahead. Thank you, General Xu.

    www.worldaffairsjournal.org, 30 August 2011

  • Turkey Amenable to South Korea’s Nuclear Energy Proposals

    Turkey Amenable to South Korea’s Nuclear Energy Proposals

    By. Joao Peixe

    Turkey’s Economy Minister Zafer Caglayan told reporters during a meeting with South Korean Knowledge Economy Minister Choi Joong-Kyung in Seoul, “My ministry and the Turkish government are open to every proposal by South Korean companies over the issue of nuclear power plants.”

    Turkey is expected to attract new investment from South Korea totaling $2.5 billion following the anticipated signing of a free trade agreement between the countries soon, Turkey’s Anadolu Ajansi reported.

    Caglayan told journalists, “More investments will come to Turkey under the FTA. We have solved many problems during the visit. We have removed the obstructions in front of the FTA to a great extend. Hyundai earlier said it could not invest in Turkey as there was not a FTA. A Free Trade Agreement will enable many South Korean companies to invest in Turkey.”

    Turkey intends to build two nuclear plants, one in Akkuyu on the Mediterranean coast, to be constructed by Russia’s state-owned atomic power company ROSATOM with an estimated cost around $20 billion. The Akkuyu facility’s construction will start in two years, with its first reactor planned to come online and begin generating electricity in 2018. Turkey’s second nuclear plant is planned to be built in the Black Sea province of Sinop. Turkey had been negotiating with Japan’s Tokyo Electric Power company, the owner and operator of Japan’s stricken Fukushima facility, which last week informed Turkey that it had withdrawn from the project, opening the way for potential South Korean involvement.

    Source: https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Turkey-Amenable-To-South-Koreas-Nuclear-Energy-Proposals.html

    By. Joao Peixe, Deputy Editor OilPrice.com

    via Turkey Amenable to South Korea’s Nuclear Energy Proposals.

  • More Thais travelling to Turkey and Middle East

    More Thais travelling to Turkey and Middle East

    Natural disasters and lingering global economic problems, especially in Europe and the US, are influencing where Thai tourists travel.

    After the powerful earthquake and tsunami took place in Japan, one of the most popular destinations for Thais, many Thai tourists moved their focus to Turkey and the Middle East.

    “Turkey and the Middle East are still fresh and cheaper than travelling to Europe,” said Luecha Binsalem, managing director of Paradise on Earth Travel Co.

    “Thai tourists who have already visited Europe are looking for new destinations with reasonable prices. They want new experiences and memories.

    “Although many of them are concerned about political turmoil in the Middle East, there are still many tourist destinations welcoming tourists with interesting Muslim culture and beautiful architecture. Our main clients are Buddhists and Thai-Chinese tourists.”

    He said Turkey was the company’s most popular destination, contributing more than half of its total revenue. Turkey package sales have grown continuously by 15-30% per year.

    The company sold around 2,000 tour packages in 2010 and expects to sell 2,400 this year. The average price is 59,000 baht for eight days, about 30,000 baht cheaper than European packages.

    “There are only two or three tour agencies in this market, but I think the number will increase significantly by 2013. Therefore we are promoting Uzbekistan. Thai tourists are concerned about accommodation, food, and tourist sites, and I strongly believe Uzbekistan has all of these,” he said.

    Thanapol Cheewarattanaporn, general manager of Quality Express Co, a leading Thai travel agent, said sales to Chinese and Japanese destinations should be fair this year.

    Europe still has demand but visa quotas limit visitors. Quality Express is selling package tours in Europe four to five months in advance to have enough time to seek visas for its clients, he said.

    Tour packages to India continue to sell like hotcakes. This is because Thai travellers love comfort and good memories, he said. Tours to India should increase to 3,000 this year, up from 1,000 last year.

    “I think this market still has room to grow because there are only 10 key players now,” said Mr Thanapol.

    via Bangkok Post : More Thais travelling to Turkey and Middle East.

  • The rise of the dragon and its lessons for the Turks

    The rise of the dragon and its lessons for the Turks

    Historically, China has always been an important country for Turkey. The problems of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region makes Turkish-Chinese relations very sensitive, but it is also necessary to state that Turkey’s intellectuals have very little knowledge of China.

    Therefore China for Turks is not so much an ‘interesting but distant’ country as a black box important to Turkey in several distinct ways, but about which we do not really possess deep knowledge.

    At a time when the world’s center of gravity is shifting from West to East, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has topped the list of countries about which people express the most interest.

    According to several analysts, this power whose economy is rapidly increasing will become the world’s largest economy in the next quarter of a century.

    Along with the growth of its economy, Beijing has come to be mentioned as an important power to consider in military strategy and in the arms race.

    China is changing at a dizzying speed, and there is no shortage of people who claim that it is shifting the axis of world politics and may upset the existing balances.

    No matter how much China may base its external relations on a ‘world in peace’, the question of whether China might adopt a more aggressive attitude in the coming ten to twenty years has become an extremely popular topic of debate in the West.

    And, though they are not quite on this scale, the policies which China follows in Xinjiang, in the Kashmir-Jammu dispute between India and Pakistan, and in Tibet do not seem particularly conciliatory.

    Turkey remains obscure to China

    Turkey is a natural product of both Western and Eastern civilizations, and it is fairly clear that very few people here have been concerned about the rise of China. Indeed, there has been virtually no interest in the topic.

    The thing that has interested Turks most, as a consumer society, is our importation of cheap goods from China. Although in fact, our relations with China began before relations with the West, and continued for centuries as neighboring states. The struggles for territory and dynastic rights between Turks and Chinese lasted for many years and led to the construction of the Great Wall of China, the one man-made structure visible from space.

    This special relationship derived from history continues even today, even if it is not as intense as in the past. The top item on our agenda at contact points is the situation of our kinsmen in Xinjiang.

    Stick a pin into Xinjiang and it produces an immediate reaction on the streets of Istanbul and Ankara, and large crowds gather at either the Chinese Consulate or the Chinese Embassy.

    So whether or not Turkey likes it, it is obliged to concern itself with events in China. In just the same way, the Bosnian tragedy drew Ankara’s attention to the Balkans and the Chechen problem directed it to the Caucasus, and the Arab spring to the Middle East , so a similar development may be anticipated in the years ahead of us in Turkish-Chinese relations.

    Therefore China for Turks is not so much an ‘interesting but distant’ country as a black box important to Turkey in several distinct ways, but about which we do not really possess deep knowledge.

    China’s rapidly growing economy has brought with it a culture of spending, led by the newly-emerging middle classes. A class structure based on a culture of spending does not intend to be satisfied with limitations in the sphere of freedom.

    The awakening giant may hold that ‘the individual is for the society’, but this approach is now being given a serious test through the rapid growth of the economy’s influence on society.

    Oppositional political currents

    It is obvious that oppositional political currents inside China will not be resolved through the shortcut of putting them down with tanks, as happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

    If we examine the question of whether or not China will follow a second Tiananmen Square incident to its logical conclusion, we are confronted by an even bigger problem.

    What will China’s contribution be as far as values are concerned to the global order? We now know the international balance in the centers of the West which came into being in 1648 with the Westphalia system, and the systemic parameters of the values upon which it was based.

    It is generally possible to predict the approximate opinions and means of the countries of Europe, which the European Union and the United States will use to reach a settlement when new problems emerge in the world. T However it is hard to grasp how China, which now has more sway over these problems in the world system, will react. For example regarding the Arab spring, China has stayed silent or not offered any response beyond its familiar subdued policies. Regardless, it is more or less impossible to guess what China will think about it tomorrow.

    So there is great uncertainty about how opinions will be produced and what values will be defended in an international system in which China is one of the principal decision makers.

    For example, how will China perform on matters such as the expansion of democracy, human rights, the supremacy of law, and freedom of expression? The performance given on these matters so far by China does not offer us a very praiseworthy score.

    Nonetheless, the future of China concerns Turkey considerably just as it does the whole world. The picture to date is not very encouraging, but Turkey’s intellectuals are strikingly lazy when it comes to keeping up with China’s present and its past. When meetings are held to discuss China, genuine experts are in short supply. It is not just think-tanks and universities but everyone concerned with the region, starting with companies that do business with China.

    They should step up the speed of efforts to study it and ensure that it continues on a stable basis.

    The first half of the twenty-first century will see more debates on China’s growing influence on world affairs. Shifts in power on a global scale clearly concern regional actors like Turkey.

    Because like all medium-sized powers, Turkey has to study the strategies of the key actors in the global equation in order to be able to have a secure place in the system.

    China is a global power which will be costly to neglect. So without delay, Turkey should abandon its habit of regarding China as simply a player in the area of consumer products, and must start generating some expertise on the world’s awakening giant.

    (Source: The Journal of Turkish Weekly)

  • Turkey warns it may buy nuclear tech from another country if Japan doesn’t clarify stance

    Turkey warns it may buy nuclear tech from another country if Japan doesn’t clarify stance

    Turkey has recently warned that unless the Japanese government clarifies its position on exporting nuclear power plants, from the end of the month Turkey might open up discussions with other countries on buying nuclear plant technology.

    In this March 11, 2011 file photo released by Tokyo Electric Power Co., waves of tsunami come toward tanks of heavy oil for the Unit 5 of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan. (AP Photo/Tokyo Electric Power Co.)
    In this March 11, 2011 file photo released by Tokyo Electric Power Co., waves of tsunami come toward tanks of heavy oil for the Unit 5 of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan. (AP Photo/Tokyo Electric Power Co.)

    In December 2010, Japan won Turkey’s agreement to be given top priority in negotiations for a supplier as Turkey plans its first nuclear power plants. However, after the Great East Japan Earthquake in March, negotiations were frozen at the request of the Japanese side. Turkey extended the negotiations to the end of July, but it appears to hold doubts over the Japanese government’s support for nuclear technology exports after Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s comments that Japan should free itself from dependence on nuclear energy and review its exports of nuclear plant technology.

    The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) appeared unshaken by Turkey’s warning, with a high-ranking member saying, “It’s not an unusual tactic in such negotiations. We will respond calmly.”

    Behind that confidence is the view, expressed by METI minister Banri Kaieda, that similarly quake-prone Turkey “has faith in Japanese nuclear power technology” even after the March 11 earthquake.

    Additionally, a high-level executive at a nuclear power equipment maker says, “There are many countries that say they want Japan’s nuclear power plant technology.”

    METI, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) and related corporations have showed their intention to continue trying to sell nuclear technology.

    However, the Cabinet is divided. While METI minister Kaieda holds to his support for exporting Japan’s nuclear technology, Prime Minister Kan has shown his support for a review of such exports. Under such circumstances, one METI official said, “It’s understandable that Turkey would be unsettled.”

    A high-ranking official of METI’s Agency for Natural Resources and Energy will visit Turkey within the week to better grasp its position, but until the Japanese government’s position on the issue is decided, it will likely be difficult for Japan to move negotiations in a favorable direction.

    In the case of Turkey, Toshiba Corp. has been negotiating for equipment orders with the Japanese government’s support. On Toshiba’s request, Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) had been planned to provide technical knowledge. However, on July 26 TEPCO, saddled with the issue of compensation for the Fukushima nuclear disaster, emphasized that it “will not be involved with nuclear power plant exports.”

    Furthermore, on May 20 TEPCO had announced, “To reduce costs, we will not be involved with projects other than those absolutely necessary,” showing that it views itself as in no position to be expanding overseas.

    Separately, on July 14, Hitachi Ltd. secured top priority from Lithuania in negotiations for selling nuclear plant technology.

    In this photo released by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), gray smoke rises from Unit 3 of the tsunami-stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, Monday, March 21, 2011. (AP Photo/Tokyo Electric Power Co.)

    A Toshiba spokesperson said, “Unlike Lithuania, where the equipment maker negotiated directly with the other country, the Turkey case depends on Japanese government policy. Unless both governments decide on a framework, we cannot act.”

    A high-ranking executive of one equipment maker said, “We will feel out the possibility of independently negotiating with countries, without relying on the government.”

    (Mainichi Japan) July 27, 2011

    via Turkey warns it may buy nuclear tech from another country if Japan doesn’t clarify stance – The Mainichi Daily News.

  • China, Russia invited to Libya talks in Istanbul

    China, Russia invited to Libya talks in Istanbul

    ANKARA — Turkey has invited China and Russia to join for the first time discussions on Libya as part of a contact group of major powers, to convene this week in Istanbul, a Turkish official said.

    “Russia and China have been invited as permanent members of the UN Security Council. We think they will participate but no information has reached us so far on what level,” foreign ministry spokesman Selcuk Unal told reporters.

    The so-called International Contact Group on Libya, scheduled to meet on Friday in Istanbul, includes the countries participating in the Nato-led campaign targeting Muammar Gadhafi’s regime and regional players.

    Russia abstained from a vote on a Security Council resolution in March that opened the way for international involvement in Libya and has since criticised the scale and intent of the Nato-led strikes.

    China, for his part, had maintained a policy of non-interference in the conflict, but has appeared more involved recently and its officials have met several times with Libyan opposition representatives.

    Along with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the foreign ministers of Australia, Bahrain, Britain, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, France, Italy, Malta, Morocco, the Netherlands, Poland and the UAE have confirmed their participation in the Istanbul meeting, Unal said. — AFP