Category: World

  • Turkish president defends discussions with Iran

    Turkish president defends discussions with Iran

    By Daniel Bases

    NEW YORK | Fri Sep 24, 2010

    Abdullah Gul

    (Reuters) – Turkish President Abdullah Gul said on Friday Turkey’s direct relations with Iran remain the best way to achieve a diplomatic solution for keeping Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

    Turkey voted against the latest round of U.N. sanctions aimed at putting pressure on Tehran, which says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.

    The United States, a key Turkish ally and fellow member of NATO, suspects Iran seeks to develop atomic weapons and is leading the effort to thwart its nuclear ambitions.

    Gul, speaking to the Council on Foreign Relations while attending the U.N. General Assembly meeting, addressed criticism that Turkey was shifting its orientation away from the West by engaging with Iran.

    “If you look at all our allies, which leaders among those countries have the ability to be able to have direct discussions with the Iranian leaders, including the supreme religious leader?” Gul asked.

    “There isn’t anyone,” he said, adding its engagement is for moving the process forward and should not be misunderstood.

    “As was the case in the past, Turkey is and will remain a strong committed and reliable ally of the United States,” he said.

    Gul once again criticized Israel’s actions in its deadly raid on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla in May. The incident has damaged relations between the two nations.

    “Having said that, I must also emphasize that Turkey and Israel are friends. There are strong, centuries-old ties of friendship between our peoples.”

    On Turkey’s European Union accession talks, Gul said the country remains committed to completing the process despite slow progress that he blamed on Europe.

    “Europe today lacks a strategic vision, a strategic perspective of what it wants to be 50-60 years down the road,” he said.

    (Editing by Xavier Briand)

    Reuters

  • Limbless Father swims across Channel

    Limbless Father swims across Channel

    A Frenchman became the first limbless person to swim the Channel on Saturday night.

    Philippe Croizon, 42, set off from Folkestone, Kent, at around 6am expecting to reach France within 24 hours but managed to complete the feat in just 13-and-a-half hours.

    He was forced to have his arms and legs amputated after he suffered an electric shock while removing a television aerial from a roof 16 years ago.

    He only taught himself to swim in the last two years and does so using prosthetic legs and a snorkel and mask.

    Earlier his spokeswoman said he was swimming faster than expected after completing his first 12 miles in just eight hours.

    After completing the 21-mile challenge, Mr Croizon told the BBC that at no point did he feel he was not going to make it, despite pains and aches all over his body.

    His father said his son had been helped by favourable wind conditions and had even had three dolphins swimming alongside at one point, which was a “sign of good luck”.

    The amputee trained for 35 hours a week for the past two years and his endeavour attracted letters of support from President Sarkozy and other politicians.

    The Telegraph

  • Police search Sarkozy party HQ in L’Oreal investigation

    Police search Sarkozy party HQ in L’Oreal investigation

    MP party chief Xavier Bertrand says that police searched the party headquarters in Paris on Wednesday as part of their ongoing investigation into the alleged involvement of Labour Minister Eric Woerth in the L’Oreal scandal.

    French police probing a party financing scandal linked to L’Oreal heiress Liliane Bettencourt have searched the headquarters of President Nicolas Sarkozy’s majority UMP, the party said Thursday.

    Police from the financial investigations squad searched the Paris headquarters on Wednesday afternoon, the party’s leader Xavier Bertrand said, in the latest development of the months-long scandal.

    Several judicial investigations are under way into affairs linked to Bettencourt’s fortune, including allegations of tax evasion and illegal campaign funding that have implicated Labour Minister Eric Woerth.

    The party’s director general Eric Cesari told AFP the police had come to look for “correspondance between Eric Woerth and Patrice de Maistre”, the manager of Bettencourt’s 17-billion-euro (22-billion-dollar) fortune.

    Woerth was previously UMP treasurer and head fundraiser for Sarkozy’s 2007 presidential campaign. He has been accused of a conflict of interest because his wife worked for Maistre, helping manage the billionairess’s estate.

    Woerth denies any wrongdoing but has been politically weakened and the long-running investigation has undermined his and Sarkozy’s attempt to push through pensions reform.

    Cesari said police had announced their visit and spent an hour a half at the headquarters checking archives, but did not take anything with them.

    Police told AFP the search was ordered by a prosecutor in the western Paris suburb of Nanterre who is investigating various aspects of Bettencourt’s affairs and allegations implicating Woerth.

    The magazine Paris Match reported on its website that investigators were searching for a letter sent by Woerth to Sarkozy in March 2007 in which Woerth called for Maistre to receive France’s top state honour, the Legion d’Honneur.

    France 24

  • US President Obama condemns plans to burn the Koran

    US President Obama condemns plans to burn the Koran

    US President Barack Obama says plans by a small church to burn copies of the Koran on the anniversary of 9/11 are a “recruitment bonanza” for al-Qaeda.

    49039097 jex 802920 de27 1

    Mr Obama said if the burning went ahead in Gainesville, Florida, it could endanger US military personnel serving in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

    The plan has drawn widespread international condemnation.

    Interpol has issued a global alert, warning the burning could provoke “violent attacks on innocent people”.

    The US State Department has advised American citizens abroad to be on the alert for possible attacks and to avoid areas where demonstrations might take place.

    Terry Jones, the pastor behind the threat, leads a congregation of 50 followers in the city of Gainesville.

    He has said the burning would be a way to stand up to terrorism.

    In an interview with ABC television, Mr Obama said he hoped Mr Jones “understands that what he’s proposing to do is completely contrary to our values as Americans, that this country has been built on the notion of freedom and religious tolerance”.

    “And as a very practical matter, I just want him to understand that this stunt that he is talking about pulling could greatly endanger our young men and women who are in uniform,” the president said.

    “Look, this is a recruitment bonanza for al-Qaeda. You could have serious violence in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan. This could increase the recruitment of individuals who’d be willing to blow themselves up in American cities, or European cities,” he said.

    “I hope he listens to those better angels and understands that this is a destructive act that he’s engaging in,” the president said.

    Later on Thursday, US officials said they was considering contacting Mr Jones directly to urge him to reconsider his plans.

    Mr Jones had told USA Today he could potentially cancel his plans if officials spoke to him directly.

    Defence Secretary Robert Gates was considering “taking this unusual measure of calling this pastor and trying to convince him that it is not the right thing to proceed with,” said Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell.

    ‘Diseased mind’

    Mr Jones said on Wednesday that his plan to burn the Islamic holy book was intended to draw attention to his belief that “something’s wrong”.

    “It is possibly time for us in a new way to actually stand up, confront terrorism,” Mr Jones told reporters outside his church.

    US officials say they cannot intervene as the church’s actions would probably be protected by the US constitution’s guarantee of freedom of speech.

    Interpol, the international police organisation, has issued an alert to all of its 188 member states, warning of “a significant threat to public safety”.

    “If the proposed Koran burning by a pastor in the US goes ahead as planned, there is a strong likelihood that violent attacks on innocent people would follow,” it said.

    The agency said it was acting partly in response to a request from the Pakistani Interior Minister, Rehman Malik.

    Earlier, Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari said in a statement that “anyone who even thought of such a despicable act must be suffering from a diseased mind and a sickly soul”.

    “It will inflame sentiments among Muslims throughout the world and cause irreparable damage to interfaith harmony and also to world peace,” he said.

    Interpol concern

    Mr Zardari’s comments echoed a chorus of condemnation from both Muslim and non-Muslim countries.

    Malaysia called it a heinous crime, while Indonesia said it would damage relations between Islam and the West.

    In the UK, Downing Street said it would not condone the burning of any book.

    “We would strongly oppose any attempt to offend any member of any religious or ethnic group. We are committed to religious tolerance,” said a spokesman for Prime Minister David Cameron.

    The plan has also sparked condemnation from Iran, the Vatican, Nato and the top US Afghan commander.

    US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called it “disgraceful” while the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC), which represents more than 50 states and promotes Muslim solidarity, said Mr Jones was following an “outrageous path of hatred”.

    “The culture of peaceful co-existence and intercommunal and inter-religious tolerance that the international community is trying to achieve is under threat from marginal and extremist fanatics,” said OIC secretary general Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu.

    On Monday Gen David Petraeus, the top US commander in Afghanistan, warned troops’ lives would be in danger if the church went ahead with its bonfire.

    The website of Mr Jones’ church was no longer accessible on Thursday, after the company hosting it withdrew it from the internet.

    Rackspace told the AFP news agency the site had “violated the Offensive Content section of its Acceptable Use policy”.

    Muslims consider the Koran to be the word of God and insist it be treated with the utmost respect. Any intentional damage or show of disrespect to the holy book is deeply offensive to them.

    BBC

  • Merkel honours Danish Muhammad cartoonist Westergaard

    Merkel honours Danish Muhammad cartoonist Westergaard

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel has defended Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, whose cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad caused anger in 2006.

    A depiction of Muhammad’s turban as a fused bomb sparked global outrage when it was published in Denmark.

    Kurt Westergaard (left) with Chancellor Merkel and German politician Joachim Gauck (centre)

    Presenting him with a press freedom award, Mrs Merkel said Mr Westergaard was entitled to draw his caricatures.

    “Europe is a place where a cartoonist is allowed to draw something like this,” she said.

    “We are talking here about the freedom of opinion and the freedom of the press,” Ms Merkel said at the ceremony in the German city of Potsdam.

    The offending cartoon – which led to a groundswell of Muslim anger in many countries around the world – was one of 12 first published by Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten in 2005.

    ‘Place of freedom’

    Mrs Merkel, who grew up in communist East Germany, added that German people clearly remembered the implications of a lack of freedom and should therefore cherish it.

    “It’s about whether in a Western society with its values he [Mr Westergaard] is allowed to publish his Muhammad cartoons, or not. Is he allowed to do it? Yes he is,” Ms Merkel said.

    She described Europe as a place that respects and values the freedom of belief and religion.

    Dozens of people died in violence that broke out in early 2006, months after Jyllands-Posten published the cartoons showing Muhammad in a variety of humorous or satirical situations. Muslims regard the depiction of the prophet as blasphemy.

    The M100 media prize committee praised Kurt Westergaard for what it said was his “courage” to defend democratic values despite threats of violence and death.

    Security was tight at Sanssouci palace in Potsdam where the cartoonist told reporters: “Maybe they will try to kill me and maybe they will have success, but they cannot kill the cartoon.”

    Speaking at the award ceremony Ms Merkel also described as “abhorrent” a plan by US pastor Terry Jones to burn copies of the Koran on Saturday, the ninth anniversary of the 11 September terror attacks.

    She said she found the idea disrespectful and “simply wrong”.

    ‘Risky decision’

    A police sniper near Sanssouci palace in Potsdam, 8 September 2010

    Mrs Merkel’s decision to speak at the event about press freedom has caused some surprise in Germany.

    One newspaper said she was taking “a huge risk”.

    Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said that the effect of having a photograph taken with Kurt Westergaard was incalculable, describing it as “probably be the most explosive appointment of her chancellorship so far”.

    Germany’s Central Muslim Council (ZMD) criticised Ms Merkel for attending the award ceremony.

    A ZMD spokesman, Aiman Mazyek, told public broadcaster Deutschlandradio that the Chancellor was honouring someone “who in our eyes kicked our prophet, and therefore kicked all Muslims”.

    He said giving Mr Westergaard the prize in a “highly charged and heated time” was “highly problematic”.

    In recent weeks Germany has seen a highly charged debate over immigration, partly set off by the publication of a book by a board member of the German central bank, Thilo Sarrazin.

    In the book Mr Sarrazin, who is also a member of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) attacked what he describes as a failure of Muslims living in the Germany to integrate.

    BBC

  • As The New World Order Falters

    As The New World Order Falters

    With U.S. Primacy In Decline, Nationalism Reshaping Balance Of Global Power

    By VICTOR DAVIS HANSON
    September 5, 2010

    The post-Cold War new world order is rapidly breaking apart. Nations are returning to the ancient passions, rivalries and differences of past centuries.

    Take Europe. The decades-old vision of a united pan-continental Europe without borders is dissolving. The cradle-to-grave welfare dream proved too expensive for Europe’s shrinking and aging population.

    Cultural, linguistic and economic divides between Germany and Greece, or Holland and Bulgaria, remain too wide to be bridged by fumbling bureaucrats in Brussels. NATO has devolved into a euphemism for American expeditionary forces.

    Nationalism is returning, based on stronger common ties of language, history, religion and culture. We are even seeing the return of a two-century-old European “problem”: a powerful Germany that logically seeks greater political influence commensurate with its undeniable economic superiority.


    The tired Israeli-Palestinian fight over the future of the West Bank is no longer the nexus of Middle East tensions. The Muslim Arab world is now more terrified by the re-emergence of a bloc of old familiar non-Arabic, Islamic fundamentalist rivals.

    With nuclear weapons, theocratic Iran wants to offer strategic protection to radical allies such as Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas, and at the same time restore Persian glory. While diverse, this rogue bunch shares contempt for the squabbling Sunni Arab world of rich but defenseless Gulf petro-sheikdoms and geriatric state authoritarians.

    Japan’s economy is still stalled. Its affluent population is shrinking and aging. Elsewhere in the region, the Japanese see an expanding China and a lunatic nuclear North Korea. Yet Japan is not sure whether the inward-looking United States is still credible in its old promise of protection against any and all enemies.

    One of two rather bleak Asian futures seems likely. Either an ascendant China will dictate the foreign policies of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, or lots of new free-lancing nuclear powers will appear to deter China since it cannot count on an insolvent U.S. for protection.

    Oil-rich Russia — deprived of its communist-era empire — seems to find lost imperial prestige and influence by being for everything that the U.S. is against. That translates into selling nuclear expertise and material to Iran, providing weapons to provocative states such as Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela, and bullying neighbors over energy supplies.

    Closer to home, Mexico has become a strange sort of friend. It devolves daily into a more corrupt and violent place than Iraq or Pakistan. The fossilized leadership in Mexico City shows no interest in reforming, either by opening its economy or liberalizing its political institutions.

    Instead, Mexico’s very survival for now rests on cynically exporting annually a million of its impoverished and unhappy citizens to America. More interested in money than its own people, the Mexican government counts on the more than $20 billion in remittances that return to the country each year.

    But American citizens are tired of picking up the tab to subsidize nearly 15 million poor illegal aliens. The growing hostility between the two countries is reminiscent of 19th-century tensions across the Rio Grande.

    How is America reacting to these back-to-the-future changes?

    Politically divided, committed to two wars, in a deep recession, insolvent and still stunned by the financial meltdown of 2008, our government seems paralyzed. As European socialism implodes, for some reason a new statist U.S. government wants to copy failure by taking over ever more of the economy and borrowing trillions more dollars to provide additional entitlements.

    As panicky old allies look for American protection, we talk of slashing our defense budget. In apologetic fashion, we spend more time appeasing confident enemies than buttressing worried friends.

    Instead of finishing our border fence and closing the southern border, we are suing a state that is trying to enforce immigration laws that the federal government will not apply. And as sectarianism spreads abroad, we at home still pursue the failed salad bowl and caricature the once-successful American melting pot.

    But just as old problems return, so do equally old solutions. Once-stodgy ideas like a free-market economy, strong defense, secure borders and national unity are suddenly appearing fresh and wise.

    Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. This was distributed by Tribune Media Services.