Category: World

  • The Case for an Immediate IAEA Special Inspection in Syria

    The Case for an Immediate IAEA Special Inspection in Syria

    ASAGİDAKİ   İLGİ  CEKİCİ   YAZİYİ   SUNUYORUM

    MAYİS  HAZİRAN AYLARİNDA   VİYANADA  GORUSTUGUM ULUSLARASİ ATOM ENERJİSİ AJANSİNDAN   ESKİ  TANİDİKLARİM ASAGİDAKİ  BİLGİYİ  DE OZEL OLARAK   -İ YAYİMLANMAMASİ RİCAS İLE-  BANA  VERMİSLERDİ
    İRAN’İN SURİYE’DE   PLUTONYUM  URETİMİNE YARAYACAK BİR REAKTORU VE LABORATUARİ FİNANSE ETTİGİ  VE CALİSMALARİN İLERLEDİGİ  SOYLENTİLER VARDİ
    SURİYE BU BİLGİLERİ  UAEA’DANN  ESİRGEMİS.

    AHDE VEFA  DEDİM  VE BANA VERİLEN  BİLGİYİ  ACİKLAMADİM.
    SİMDİ İSE   UAEA ‘NIN ARTİK ORADA GOREVLİ OLMAYAN   ANCAK BU KONULARDA COK BİLGİLİ   VE EN YETKİLİ  UST DUZEY YONETİCİSİ  OOLİ HEİNONEN    ASAGİDAKİ MAKALEYİ, YAZMİS  VE  BİLGİYİ KAMU OYUNA ACKLAMİS DURUMDA

    TURK HUKUMETİNİN  VE SERVİSLERİNİN   BU KONUDA BİLGİ SAHİBİ OLMADİKLARİ  GORUSU  PEK COK NEDENLE  VİYANA’DA   KABUL GORMUYOR.

    PLUTONYUM  URETİMİ   İCİN KİMYASAL AYİRMA TESİSİ   KURULMASİNİN   HİC BİR BARİSCİ  UYGULAMASİ YOK

    TURKİYE’NİN  BOLGEDE OLUP BİTENDEN  İSTİHBARAT YOLUYLA  HABERDAR OLMASİ GEREKTİGİ YOLUNDAKİ  GEREKCELERDEN BİRİ DE  UAEA GUVERNORLER MECLİSİNE  UYE OLDUGU DONEMDE  TURKİYE’Yİ  (BUGUNE KADAR OLDUGUNUN AKSİNE) ORADAKİ BUYUKELCİNİN  DEGİL DE  SİMDİ MİT MUSTESARİ OLAN ZATİN  TEMSİL ETMİS BULUNMASİ

    ZENGİNLESTİRİLMİS URANYUM TAKASİ KONUSUNDAKİ BİLGİLER  İSE  BASİNDA YER ALDİ.
    ANCAK  TURK BASİNİNDA  GORMEDİGİM BİR  AYRİNNTİ VAR
    ABD  BREZİLYA’YA OLDUGU GİBİ  TURKİYE’YE DE   YAZİLİ OLARAK   TAKAS  EDİLECEK MİKDARİN DİSİNDA  İRAN’DA KALAN  ZENGİNLESTİRİLMİS URANYUM   MİKDARİ  KONUSUNDAA  BİLGİ VERMİS.
    BEN  BREZİLYA’YA   YOLLANAN MEKTUBU      BASİNDA OKUDUM.    ESASEN  BREZİLYA   DA BU  ACİKLAMADAN SONRA    UCLU  TAKAS   DUZENLEMESİNDEKİ AKTİF ROLUNDEN GERİ  CEKİLMİSTİ.

    SOZUN OZU : BULANİK  YA DA RADYASYON KİRLİLİGİ BULUNAN  SULARDA  YUZMEYE KALKİSAN   HASTALANABİLİR.

    SAYGİLARLA

    PULAT TACAR
    PULAT TACAR2

    Date: 2010/11/5
    Subject: The Case for an Immediate IAEA Special Inspection in Syria (PolicyWatch #1715 by Olli Heinonen)
    To: Pulat Tacar <tacarps@gmail.com>

    Follow the Institute on
    Have trouble viewing? Click here.
    PolicyWatch #1715
    The Case for an Immediate IAEA Special Inspection in Syria
    By Olli Heinonen
    November 5, 2010

    A key option for inspectors of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the world body charged with stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, is a “special inspection” an intrusive visit made when the IAEA judges the information provided by a state to be inadequate. But The IAEA is reluctant to use such inspections, even though, in the case of Syria, circumstances cry out for one. This reluctance challenges the authority and credibility of the agency, its board of governors (made up of the representatives of thirty-five of its member states), and the ultimate guardian of the world nuclear order, the United Nations Security Council.

    Background
    Since 1970, the IAEA has been responsible for inspecting the nuclear facilities of states that have signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) to make sure that nuclear material is not diverted from peaceful activities to nuclear weapons programs. This does not mean, however, that over the course of the last forty years, all issues relating to these so-called “safeguard” missions have been clarified and the necessary policies and practices established.

    The IAEA verification system has evolved over time to meet the new challenges posed by the spread of nuclear weapons. The agency’s tools are inspections, reports of its findings to its board, and, if it deems necessary, referral of cases of concern to the UN Security Council. Until the early 1990s, the system focused on checking the correctness of a member state’s declarations, that is, confirming that declared nuclear material had not been diverted. Since then, the system has also focused on detecting undeclared nuclear material and activities. The combination of these two objectives better serves the intent of Article III, Section 1, of the NPT, which sets the goal of “preventing diversion of nuclear energy . . . to nuclear weapons.”

    It is important to note that the NPT uses the word “preventing,” which means that the verification system must be designed to work so that alarms are triggered before the actual diversion takes place or a mushroom cloud appears.

    After the safeguards system was revamped to detect undeclared activities, North Korea, Iran, South Korea, Egypt, Libya, and Syria failed to meet the reporting requirements under their safeguards agreements. The cases of South Korea and Libya were resolved with the cooperation of the states, and the case of Iran is being dealt with by the UN Security Council. The Egyptian case, relating to the presence of highly enriched uranium particles, has yet to be resolved.

    Use of Special Inspections
    Special inspections have been attempted only twice. The first case was in post-communist Romania in 1992, when the IAEA was asked to verify unreported plutonium separation experiments conducted during the Ceausescu regime. The affair did not make headlines; the request for inspection came in May 1992, the IAEA’s director general reported the results in September 1992, and no special reports were issued.

    The media focused much greater attention on the case of North Korea, where the IAEA requested a special inspection in 1993 but was refused the necessary access by Pyongyang. Subsequently referred to the UN Security Council, the case is being handled in a lengthy process that is still unfinished. Indeed, North Korea has since carried out two nuclear tests, one in 2006 and one in 2009.

    Defining ‘Special’ to Mean ‘Rare’
    Before the 1992 and 1993 special inspection cases, the IAEA board had been strengthening the safeguards system, whose limitations had become apparent after Saddam Hussein’s clandestine nuclear weapons program was discovered in Iraq following the expulsion of his forces from Kuwait. The role of special inspections was discussed, and one of the outcomes was the decision that a special inspection should be carried out “in rare occasions only.” This definition has led some to consider special inspections as a good theoretical option, but one that never needs to be used.

    This is a fallacy premised on the fact that a great majority of NPT signatory states duly fulfill their reporting obligations, cooperate with the IAEA, and comply with their obligations. Under such circumstances, there is no need for a special inspection, and consequently, such an event is indeed rare. But the decision of the IAEA board should not be taken to mean that such an inspection should be a rare event, but rather, that it should be used when needed.

    The IAEA Secretariat should, therefore, use its rights fully to meet the spirit of the NPT by preventing the diversion of nuclear energy technologies and material to nuclear weapons. This is the agency’s obligation; its secretariat should use all the tools at its disposal in a timely manner to fulfill its mandate. The special inspection is no exception; it should be used when there is an impasse, and challenges should not be allowed to persist and become increasingly complicated. Special inspections should not be treated lightly, but when they make it possible to clarify the picture or to remove inconsistencies, the world community must not shy away from them.

    The IAEA could have invoked the provisions of a special inspection in the cases of South Korea and Libya. But it received the necessary cooperation from the inspected parties, had access to all sites, persons, and information requested, and was therefore able to fulfill its mandate to ensure that all nuclear material in those states was for peaceful use only.

    In the case of Syria, however, the IAEA has reached a point where a special inspection is warranted at Deir Al-Zour (destroyed in a reported Israeli air strike in 2007) and other locations that could be functionally related to it or that may have information useful for clarifying what was going on there. The IAEA found uranium particles at the site, and satellite imagery and procurement information point toward possible construction of a nuclear reactor there. If it was a nuclear reactor, this would have been the first time that an IAEA member state and an NPT signatory constructed a plutonium production reactor on such a scale without reporting it to the IAEA. Together with official Syrian reluctance to give the agency access to relevant information, persons, equipment, and sites, the resulting situation calls for the use of full inspection rights to ensure that all nuclear material in Syria is for peaceful purposes.

    If the world nuclear order is to be maintained and sanctuary for future nuclear proliferators prevented, the international community should expect nothing less than that the IAEA will use all its inspection rights in Syria, including a special inspection, now.

    Olli Heinonen, a senior fellow at the Belfer Center at Harvard University, was formerly deputy director-general and head of the department of safeguards at the International Atomic Energy Agency.

  • BBC apologises to Bob Geldof over Band Aid claims

    BBC apologises to Bob Geldof over Band Aid claims

    BBC admits it was wrong to have given ‘impression’ that money from charity song ended up being spent on weapons

    Bob Geldof

    Not many people come away from a clash with Bob Geldof unscathed. And for the BBC it has proved no different. Today, across BBC1, Radio 4 and the World Service, it will broadcast an apology to the singer-philanthropist and the Band Aid Trust he founded.

    Accused by Geldof of causing “appalling damage” to the famine relief charity he founded in 1985, the BBC will admit that it was wrong, in a story broadcast in March this year, to have given the “impression” that money raised from the Band Aid single Do They Know It’s Christmas ended up being spent on weapons rather than charity. It is a climbdown that Geldof said would “begin to repair some of the appalling damage done” to the reputation of Band Aid, and he welcomed it “on behalf of all those members of the public who have so magnificently donated to Band Aid and Live Aid over the last 26 years”.

    Once, the BBC’s relationship with Geldof was very different. It was dispatches by BBC reporter Michael Buerk from famine-hit Ethiopia that prompted Geldof to record the song in the first place, and it was the corporation that broadcast the Live Aid concert in 1985.

    But goodwill evaporated this year when the World Service’s Africa editor, Martin Plaut, broadcast a story featuring a former Ethiopian rebel commander who claimed that in 1985 only 5% of the $100m destined for famine relief in the northern province of Tigray reached the starving.

    The BBC now admits that Assignment programme failed to clearly distinguish that in fact no Band Aid cash was diverted for arms sales – an embarrassing admission that Geldof said was a “lapse in standards” by the corporation.

    An inquiry by the BBC’s editorial complaints unit stressed that Assignment “did not make the allegation that relief aid provided by Band Aid was diverted” but conceded that “this impression could have been taken from the programme” because viewers would have assumed that claims made by the former rebel applied to the money he helped raise.

    The programme also carried an allegation from another former rebel that the Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front had tricked aid workers into giving them money meant to buy food for the starving. The story was picked up by BBC news bulletins, including the Six O’Clock News.

    The BBC said it “should have been more explicit in making it clear that the [Tigrayan] allegations did not relate specifically to Band Aid. There will be on air apologies and corrections and we are looking at the lessons that can be learnt.”

    Today Sir Brian Barder, the British ambassador to Ethiopia between 1982 and 1986, said: “I welcome the BBC’s far-reaching apology to the Band Aid Trust for the seriously unfair and misleading impression given by the BBC World Service Assignment programme about alleged diversion of famine relief aid in limited rebel-held areas of the Ethiopian province of Tigray in the 1980s.

    “The apology makes it absolutely clear that none of these allegations applied to the Band Aid relief effort.”

    The publicity will be a blow to the BBC, just a day after world affairs editor John Simpson compared last month’s hastily negotiated licence fee settlement with “waterboarding”, arguing it leaves the corporation “at the government’s mercy”. To add to the corporation’s woes it is also facing a 48-hour strike from Friday by BBC journalists over pension changes.

    The Guardian

  • Turkey to bring water to Cyprus through pipelines beneath sea

    Turkey to bring water to Cyprus through pipelines beneath sea

    Turkey’s environment minister said that Turkey would bring water to Cyprus through pipelines beneath the sea.

    Eroglu

    Turkey’s environment minister said on Wednesday that Turkey would bring water to Cyprus through pipelines beneath the sea.

    Minister Veysel Eroglu defined the project a difficult one, and said it would be the first of its type in the world.

    “Thus, we will be connected to Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) with water,” Eroglu said during his meeting with TRNC’s Tourism, Environment and Culture Minister Kemal Durust in Ankara.

    Eroglu said Turkey hoped to solve Cyprus’ water problem, and tenders had been opened for the project–the first step of which was Alakopru Dam.

    Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan would lay the foundation of the dam on November 3, Eroglu also said.

    Another dam named Gecitkoy will also be constructed within the framework of the project aiming to carry water from Turkey to TRNC through pipelines beneath the sea. The tender for the Gecitkoy dam will be held as soon as possible.

    Alakopru dam is expected to be constructed within four years and Gecitkoy within three years.

    WorldBulletin

  • Jennifer Lopez and Turkish Republic Of Northern Cyprus

    Jennifer Lopez and Turkish Republic Of Northern Cyprus

    By Tolga Cakir

    Most of us remember the Jennifer Lopez called off a controversial birthday show in the north of Cyprus, provoking celebrations by Greek Cypriots and condemnations from Turkish Cypriots. Greek Cypriot online campaign pushed Jennifer Lopez to cancel her performance at a hotel in Northern Republic of Turkish Cyprus.

    The Cyprus issue is crystal clear; Turkey intervened to the Cyprus at 1974 after Eoka terrorism took so many innocent lives of Turks and British people.

    Kibris rum barbarligi

    If Jennifer Lopez and her team were kind enough to make a little bit of research, they would certainly understand the severity of the mistakes they have made. Moreover recent BBC records that were published may have helped Jennifer Lopez and her team to understand this important matter.This is a matter of human rights.

    We are calling Jennifer Lopez and her team to act

    We are calling them to act now

    We are calling them to take the side of good

    Jennifer Lopez

    For this London may be the right place, where many Turkish Cypriots live. Jennifer Lopez and her team can celebrate an important event with the Turkish Cypriot Community in London to show the world that they are not involved in politics and they support human rights.

    Photo :Internet Haber CSMonitor

  • Vietnam and Turkey’s Trade to increase

    Vietnam and Turkey’s Trade to increase

    Viet Nam News spoke with Turkish Ambassador Ates Oktem on the occasion of his country’s national day today.Turk Amb to viet

    Viet Nam and Turkey are aiming to achieve a two-way trade turnover of US$1 billion in 2010. In the first eight months of this year, it was about $400 million – a major increase as from the same period last year. Do you think the two countries will be able to achieve this year’s trade target?

    In spite of the global economic crisis, the volume of trade between Turkey and Viet Nam is promising to reach $1 billion in 2010.

    The Governments of Turkey and Viet Nam have been encouraging and facilitating economic and trade relations and co-operation by creating the necessary legal framework and infrastructure. Turkish and Vietnamese businessmen are looking to develop economic and commercial relations.

    The Agreement on the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investment and the Agreement on Avoidance of Double Taxation between Turkey and Viet Nam are in their concluding phase. These agreements will serve to create a secure business environment for our private sectors. Both sides want to hold joint economic and trade committee meetings. Business forums held in Istanbul in November 2008 and Ha Noi in October 2009 were successful. Businessmen from both sides had the opportunity to exchange views on issues of mutual interest. Meanwhile, the Joint Business Council will serve as a permanent consultation mechanism between the private sectors. It comes under the auspices of the Turkish Union of Chambers of Commerce and Commodity Exchanges and the Viet Nam Chamber of Commerce and Industry, and will contribute to strengthening commercial relations. These positive developments in recent years have given impetus to our economic and commercial relations.

    Efforts have been made to promote co-operation between Turkish and Vietnamese business communities by encouraging greater participation in activities such as trade fairs, conferences, seminars and workshops in high-priority sectors such as textiles, machinery and food. That, in conjunction with greater contact and dialogue between businesses and industry on both sides, leads us to believe we will achieve a bilateral trade volume of $1 billion either in 2010 or 2011.

    Turkish Airlines plans to begin flying between Istanbul and HCM City by the end of 2010. How will this benefit the two countries?

    Turkish Airlines will launch its flights from Istanbul to HCM City as from December 29, 2010, within the framework of the Bilateral Air Services Agreement Between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam for Scheduled Air Services Between Their Territories and Beyond. That agreement and a memorandum of understanding was signed by the General Directorate of Civil Aviation of Turkey and the Civil Aviation Administration of Viet Nam on March 17, 2009.

    Turkey, because of her geographic location and close historical and cultural ties across a vast landscape, will serve as a crucial bridge for dialogue and interaction between civilisations at the heart of Eurasia. It will serve as a bridge between Viet Nam, Europe, the Middle East and the Caucasus.

    Viet Nam is pushing ahead with its renewal cause in order to actively participate in the development of ever closer economic relations within ASEAN. It is also striving to promote economic interactions between ASEAN and its partners throughout the world. Viet Nam is an ideal bridge for Turkey to link with other Southeast Asian countries.

    Flights by Turkish Airlines between Istanbul and HCM City will help Turkish and Vietnamese businessmen interact, as well as tourists travel between the two countries. These flights will pave the way for developing and strengthening our bilateral economic, commercial and cultural relations.

    Turkey actively sends workers overseas as part of its economic development plan. Viet Nam has a similar policy. How successful has your programme been?

    The emigration of Turkish citizens to Western Europe to compensate for a labour shortage started in the early 1960s. Turkey signed Labour Force Agreements with Germany in 1961; Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands in 1964; France in 1965 and Australia in 1967. The immigration of Turkish labourers into Western Europe continued until 1974. From this date onwards, Turkish labourers began to focus on North Africa, the Middle East and the Gulf countries. Following the disintegration of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the labour force was directed towards the Russian Federation. This transformation helped to open up the Turkish economy to the world and benefited Turkish contractors undertaking infrastructure projects in the region.

    From the 1970s onwards, Turkish immigrants in Western Europe began to think of their move as permanent rather than temporary. Today, the majority of Turks living abroad, a considerable number of whom have obtained citizenship in their destination countries, are permanent residents.

    Today, approximately 5 million Turkish citizens live abroad, of which about 4 million reside in EU countries, 300,000 in Northern America, 150,000 in Australia and 200,000 in the Middle East.

    Turkish immigrants have contributed significantly to the Turkish economy as well as to the economic development of the immigration countries. Most of them also contribute to their destination countries’ political, social, cultural and economic life, not only as blue-collar labourers but also as professionals in many areas, such as academics, scientists, doctors, journalists, engineers, lawyers, entrepreneurs, artisans, politicians, athletes, etc. Numerous Turkish migrant workers have left their labourer identity behind and have established their own business. The number of companies established by Turkish businessmen in Western Europe has risen to approximately 140,000, 70,000 of them in Germany alone. These enterprises are providing jobs for 640,000 employees (330,000 in Germany). Their total annual turnover exceeds 50 billion euros – 32.7 billion euros in Germany alone. According to the latest statistics, the annual expenditure of Turks living in Western Europe amounts to 22.7 billion euros.

    Turkey welcomes the active participation of its citizens in the social, economical, cultural and political life of the immigration countries while maintaining ties with their motherland, original culture and mother-tongue.

    In June, Viet Nam and Iraq officially joined the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia (CICA), which is chaired by Turkey. How will Viet Nam’s membership of CICA benefit these countries and the organisation itself?Kiz kulesi1

    CICA member states desire to establish a firm foundation for common action to promote co-operation in the CICA region in the spirit of equality and partnership, and thereby contribute towards peace, progress and prosperity in Asia. CICA member states are determined to create an environment of comprehensive and indivisible security in Asia, where all states co-exist peacefully and their peoples live in peace, freedom and prosperity.

    Viet Nam’s membership of CICA will help its development efforts, particularly as the country is also an active member of ASEAN and fully supportive of common efforts to strengthen and boost co-operation and dialogue between Asia and Europe.

    On the other hand, Viet Nam will benefit from co-operation within the framework of CICA, which is a multilateral forum for close ties, political dialogue and interaction, comprehensive consultation and decision making based on consensus.

    Could you briefly describe to our readers some of Turkey’s main attractions – cultural and work-wise?

    Turkey’s tourism industry has grown rapidly since 1980. The number of tourists visiting Turkey in 1980 was close to 1.5 million. This figure went up to 26.5 million in 2008. Meanwhile, tourism revenue in 1980 was $326 million, in 2008 it was $21.91 billion.

    Istanbul, which was the capital city of the Ottoman Empire, has become a modern city, while preserving its magnificence and history. Visitors are fascinated by Istanbul’s history and culture – its museums, palaces, mosques, churches, bazaars and natural attractions.

    The Cappadocian region is renowned for its beauty and history. Early settlers inhabited the rock formations known evocatively as Peri Bacalari Chimneys. They carved out houses and churches inside these formations and adorned them with frescos, which carry the traces of the thousands of years of civilisation.

    If someone said the most scenic vistas in Anatolia could be found on the coast of the Aegean, he would not be exaggerating. The bays and peninsulas, coves and golden beaches stretch the length of the beautiful coastline. At almost every turn, you will encounter theatres, temples and agoras (open places of assembly) in the ancient cities of Bodrum, Fethiye, Marmaris, Kusadasi. — VNS

    Vietnam News

  • Israel’s U.S. ambassador: No one will dictate Israel’s borders

    Israel’s U.S. ambassador: No one will dictate Israel’s borders

    Michael Oren speaks at event marking 25 years since establishment of Free Trade agreement between Israel and the U.S.

    By Natasha Mozgovaya

    Israel’s ambassador to the United States Michael Oren remarked on Tuesday that Israel would not allow anyone to dictate its borders.

    Israeli Ambassador to Us Michael Oren
    Ambassador Michael Oren. Photo by: Natasha Mozgovaya

    “Like Ben-Gurion, Netanyahu will not allow the United Nations, or any other organization, to dictate our borders. They will be determined through negotiations,” he said in Washington during an event at the Chamber of commerce celebrating 25 years since the establishment of the Free Trade agreement between the U.S. and Israel.

    In September, Israel entered into U.S.-sponsored direct peace negotiations with the Palestinians, which subsequently broke down in the wake of the expiration of a temporary Israeli moratorium on construction in West Bank settlements. As part of the negotiations, Palestinian negotiators have demanded the establishment of a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders.

    “Today, too, Israel is blessed with principled and courageous leadership. While facing terrorist groups sworn to destroy every last one of us – women, children, senior citizens – and some 60,000 Hamas and Hezbollah rockets pointed directly at our homes; with so-called human rights organizations and boycott movements and campus coalitions denying our right to defend ourselves and even our right to exist, and with Iranian leaders swearing to wipe us off the map and striving to produce the nuclear means for doing that…. With all of those challenges, the Israeli government under PM Benjamin Netanyahu has not for a nanosecond reduced its commitment to peace,” Oren said.

    “But not a peace at any price,” he added. “Not a peace that will impair Israel’s security or impugn its identity as the nation state of the Jewish people.

    As Netanyahu said last year in his Bar-Ilan speech, he will not allow any future Palestinian state to become another Lebanon or Gaza.”

    Speaking about Israel’s economic achievements, Oren went on to say that “you may also have heard that 2010 was Israel’s biggest tourism year ever, breaking last year’s record by 27 percent, or that Israel’s thriving film industry has produced two Oscar Best Foreign Picture nominations in the last two years. You might have heard that Israel’s wine industry, more than 140 wineries strong, has surpassed the 30 million bottle a year mark with annual export increase of 25 percent – to France – or that Bank of Israel Governor Stanley Fischer has now been named the most successful National Bank Governor in the world.”

    https://www.haaretz.com/2010-10-19/ty-article/israels-u-s-ambassador-no-one-will-dictate-israels-borders/0000017f-db5a-d3ff-a7ff-fbfa83500000, 19.10.2010