Category: World

  • Linguists name ‘occupy’ as 2011’s word of the year

    Linguists name ‘occupy’ as 2011’s word of the year

    By Stephanie Gallman, CNN

    occupy word of year
    "Occupy" is 2011's word of the year, winning a runoff vote by a whopping majority.

    (CNN) — The linguists have spoken and they have decided — “Occupy” is 2011’s word of the year.

    Members of the American Dialect Society came out in record numbers to vote Friday night at the organization’s annual conference, held this year in Portland, Oregon.

    “Occupy” won a runoff vote by a whopping majority, earning more votes than “FOMO” (an acronym for “Fear of Missing Out,” describing anxiety over being inundated by the information on social media) and “the 99%,” (those held to be at a financial or political disadvantage to the top moneymakers, the one-percenters).

    Occupy joins previous year’s winners, “app,” “tweet,” and “bailout.”

    “It’s a very old word, but over the course of just a few months it took on another life and moved in new and unexpected directions, thanks to a national and global movement,” Ben Zimmer, chair of the New Words Committee for the American Dialect Society, said in a statement.

    The Occupy Wall Street movement began in September in Lower Manhattan, before spreading to communities around the country and the world as a call to action against unequal distribution of wealth and other issues.

    Founded in 1889, the American Dialect Society is made up of “academics, linguists, anyone involved in the specialization of language,” according to Grant Barrett, the society’s vice president.

    Barrett, who also co-hosts “A Way with Words,” a public radio program about language, said the annual conference provides an opportunity for linguistics professionals and graduate students to share information and research.

    But Barrett says the word of the year vote, now in its 22nd year is, “light-hearted and whimsical.”

    Nominations for the word of the year are submitted by society members in attendance at the annual conference, but can also be submitted by the community at large.

    “Occupy” may have taken top honors, but several other words and phrases received recognition.

    “Mellencamp,” a woman who has aged out of being a “cougar” (after John Cougar Mellencamp), and “kardash,” a unit of measurement consisting of 72 days, after the short-lived marriage of Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries, were both recognized in the “Most Creative” category.

    Barrett said many of the nominated words that have significance now likely won’t stand the test of time.

    For instance, “Tebowing” and “9-9-9” were quite popular in 2011, but Barrett doubts they’ll last very long.

    Some words are just outright unnecessary — like Charlie Sheen’s “bi-winning,” a term he used to describe himself pridefully, dismissing accusations of being bipolar, and “amazeballs,” a slang form of amazing.

    In the most outrageous category, “deather” — one who doubts the official story of the killing of Osama bin Laden — was recognized.

    While all in good fun and a chance for “good-natured intelligent people to let their hair down,” Barrett hopes the word of the year vote conveys two important messages to even the purist of linguists: “Language change is normal. Language change is interesting.”

    cnn.com, anuary 8, 2012

  • 9/11 Truth could be the answer to the Israel/Palestine conflict

    9/11 Truth could be the answer to the Israel/Palestine conflict

    by Joshua Blakeney

    I appeared on this week’s edition of the Press TV show Remember Palestine. I used the platform that Press TV graciously provided me with to argue that those of us who want to bring an end to the Israel-Palestine conflict ought to capitalize on the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11 rather than neglect the subject because it is deemed by some to be “controversial”.

    I think most would agree that without the U.S. government altering its stance vis-à-vis Israel that there is little hope for justice in Palestine. The only conceivable way of the U.S. undertaking a volte-face vis-à-vis Israel is if a sufficient proportion of the citizens of the U.S. become conscious of

    a) the extent to which Israel and its affluent supporters are distorting U.S. Middle East policy as well as

    b) the extent to which such pro-Israel forces lack any respect for the U.S. taxpayer.

    islamophobia
    Arabs and Muslims have been dehumanized and stigmatized in the Western media

    Unfortunately, Arabs and Muslims have been dehumanized by opportunist journalists and careerist academicians who have jumped on the anti-Islam, pro-Israel bandwagon, post 9/11, which has resulted in a preponderance of U.S. citizens lacking any empathy with the beleaguered Palestinians and the other benighted inhabitants of the region.

    I argued on Remember Palestine that the abundant evidence linking Israel to 9/11 provides the pro-Palestinian movement with a unique opportunity to foster such empathy among the U.S. body politic. Those in the pro-Palestinian movement, I argue, must stop shying away from the evidence linking Israel to 9/11 and must actively educate the people of the U.S. and other nations that nearly 3000 U.S. citizens were slain on 9/11 with the complicity of the Israeli government.

    I suspect that many U.S. citizens would be unmoved if you informed them that 3000 or even 3 million Arabs and Muslims had been killed by Israel. Indeed Dr. Gideon Polya has deduced that the (largely Israeli concocted) 9/11 wars have resulted in the deaths of as many as 2.3 million Iraqis and 4.5 million Afghans and, yet, the anti-Islamic 9/11 wars continue unabated. The most recent phase of the 9/11 wars includes an illegal incursion into Libya and increased meddling in Syria. The main goal from the perspective of the Israeli government has been to foment sectarianism and civil war in the Middle East so those who dwell in the Middle East are fighting each other rather than the Israeli hegemon.

    I am of the view that the pro-Palestinian movement ought to emphasize the fact that 3000 mostly Caucasian and non-Muslim U.S. citizens were killed on 9/11 with the complicity of the Israeli government. It’s not that U.S. or caucasian blood should be deemed more valuable than Palestinian or Arab blood. The Western media have created an intellectual environment where, in the eyes of many U.S. citizens, Palestinian and Arab blood isvalueless. Thus, those of us who are serious about promoting peace in the region ought to emphasize crimes of the Israeli government that will have the most efficacy in mobilizing support for the Palestinians.

    It is likely that if enough U.S. citizens became aware of the Israeli involvement in 9/11 that they would begin to voice criticism of the U.S.-Israeli “special relationship.” Thus, this is the tack I am taking in most of my media appearances. I encourage others to do so.

    chomsky a self proclaimed zionist
    Noam Chomsky, a self-proclaimed Zionist, perplexed many when, unburdened by evidence, he affirmed the official story of 9/11 within months of the terrorist atrocities

    I very much hope that those academicians who focus on the Israel-Palestine conflict such as Norman Finkelstein, Stephen Walt, John Mearsheimer, Noam  Chomsky, Ali Abunimah, Ilan Pappé and others will likewise acknowledge the evidence implicating Israel in 9/11 as this evidence could be decisive in ending the Israel-Palestine impasse. [For more on Chomsky’s 9/11 denialism, which was presaged by his dismissal of conspiracy in the death of JFK, see: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/12/18/the-assassination-of-cpl-pat-tillman-usa/]

    Such scholars have since 9/11 presupposed the veracity of the official story of 9/11 and in doing so have based much of their scholarship on a false-premise, namely that bin-Laden and al-Qaeda were responsible for 9/11, when this theory, which is a conspiracy theory, has been debunked by numerous credible scholars including David Ray Griffin who has written ten books addressing very specific claims made by adherents to the official story of 9/11 demonstrating them to be inconsistent with the available evidence and in many cases even with the laws of physics and of aerodynamics. Indeed many ears should have pricked up when, in the immediate hours following 9/11, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine was blamed and footage of Palestinians dancing, albeit from 1993, was projected to the U.S. public.

    I think history will not absolve those in the so called “pro-Palestinian” movement who have helped to suppress evidence implicating Israel in 9/11. Imagine if the Afrikaners, during the 1980s, out of desperation had killed 3000 Americans and blamed this act of terrorism on the ANC so as to make it’s enemies (in this case black africans) the perceived enemy of the American people thus justifying the continuance of the U.S.-South African “special relationship”. Would the anti-apartheid movement not have been feckless, indeed insane, if they had failed capitalized on this blunder of the pro-apartheid forces?

    It does a disservice to the Palestinians and non-Palestinian victims of Israeli foreign policy to try to divorce the Palestine Question from the broader manifestations of the locus of power which James Petras has referred to as the “Zionist Power Configuration” (ZPC). This ZPC operates at both a global and local level as was indicated on 9/11. As Naomi Klein accurately wrote in the Guardian “[the] Likudisation of the world [is] the real legacy of 9/11.”

    For those of us living in Western countries, especially in North America, the most efficient way for us to engender empathy with the Palestinians in the eyes of uninformed Westerners, especially U.S. citizens, is for us to illuminate Israel’s involvement in the massacre of U.S. citizens on 9/11. A failure to capitalize on Israel’s most egregious crimes and blunders is tantamount to complicity in the oppression of the Palestinians and the other victims of Israeli foreign policy.

    www.veteranstoday.com, January 1st, 2012

  • Hackers group Anonymous warns of New Years Eve leak

    Hackers group Anonymous warns of New Years Eve leak

    In the latest information breach in retaliation for the prosecution of Bradley Manning, Anonymous releases more data from intelligence analysis firm, Stratfor, and issues a New Years Eve warning.

    Anonymous Stratfor

    “On this date, we will be launching our contributions to project mayhem by attacking multiple law enforcement targets from coast to coast.”

    Anonymous

    31 anonymousMembers of the activist hackers group, Anonymous, calling themselves ‘Antisec’, posted links on the internet to what they said were 75,000 names, addresses, credit card numbers and passwords for Stratfor clients.

    Antisec also said that it revealed another 860,000 user names, email addresses and passwords for those registered to Stratfor, using the data-sharing website Pastebin, and that 50,000 of the email addresses end in .mil and .gov, which are used by the US government.

    Security think tank, Stratfor, gathers intelligence and provides reports on international security and threats to government and private sector security.

    Anonymous hacked into Stratfor’s company data on Christmas Eve, and published what it said was Stratfor’s confidential client which included top security contractors, major technology firms and law enforcement agencies. Reuters news agency reported that the list includes US Vice President Dan Quayle, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and former CIA director Jim Woolsey. Corporations on the list include Bank of America and Goldman Sachs.

    The hacker collective also used the stolen credit card details to make donations to charities and posted images of the receipts online.

    Antisec said the latest attack is retaliation for the prosecution of US Army private Bradley Manning, who is accused of leaking more than 700,000 US documents to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks.

    Pentagon Papers

    New Years Eve threat

    Antisec is now drip feeding information obtained during the security breach. In an internet statement, the group said it warned of another leak on New Year’s Eve as well as what it called “noise demonstrations” outside jails and prisons, presumably to show support of convicted hackers: “On this date, we will be launching our contributions to project mayhem by attacking multiple law enforcement targets from coast to coast.”

    A spokesperson said via Twitter that soon to be released emails from the company would show “Stratfor is not the ‘harmless company’ it tries to paint itself as.”

    Jeffrey Carr, chief executive of Taia Global Inc and author of the book Inside Cyber Warfare: Mapping the Cyber Underworld, warned that future leaks could contain crucial information. “Those emails are going to be dynamite and may provide a lot of useful information to adversaries of the U.S. government,” he told Reuters. However the Pentagon said it was not threatened by the attack.

    Stratfor website down

    Anonymous said it was able to access the information partly because Stratfor did not encrypt it – something that could be a major source of embarrassment for the intelligence firm.

    The Stratfor website has been offline for almost a week since it came under attack almost a week ago. Since then, the company has been communicating through its Facebook page and sending its analysis to members via email.

    In a statement, Stratfor said it “regrets the latest disclosure of information obtained illegally from the company’s data systems,” which included “credit card information of paid subscribers and many email addresses of those who receive Stratfor’s free services”.

    Anonymous has launched a series of hacking attacks over the last year against companies that it perceives to be enemies of the anti-secrecy site, WikiLeaks.

    www.channel4.com, 31 December 2011

  • Turkey to Revise its Diaspora Concept

    Turkey to Revise its Diaspora Concept

    Turkey renews its rhetoric that it applied within its action plan against Armenian initiatives on the incidents of 1915. Ankara constitutes its action plan on raising awareness in the international arena on overall incidents of the World War I-era in a way that includes what all Ottoman people suffered.

    Turkey would change its “concept of diaspora,” Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu said. Turkish officials would have face to face talks on joint history with anyone who migrated from Anatolia from whichever religion or sect they were, including Armenians, Greeks and Jews, he said. “They are our diasporas.” Turkey would tell how France and some colonialists had set “riot between us” in that era, he said.

    Turkey’s short-term action plan against Armenian resolutions and long-term plans for the upcoming 100th year of the alleged Armenian “genocide” will be an issue during the meetings of Turkish ambassadors, who gathered in Ankara to review Turkey’s foreign policy, a diplomatic source told Hürriyet Daily News Dec. 23. Ankara was also concerned with Armenian initiatives in

    the U.S. because of the upcoming presidential elections in that country. Ankara would raise its voice against the bill “all around the world,” Davutoğlu said, adding that Turkey would decide whether to “sharpen or ease” measures against France according to Paris’ attitude.

    Parliament scraps friendship group

    In a related development, Parliament Speaker Cemil Çiçek said yesterday that the adoption of the denial bill had made the France friendship group in Parliament redundant and announced that its 350-odd members had begun resigning. Çiçek said the stance of French Parliament was “biased, hostile and poisonous” for bilateral relations. “Maintaining friendly relations with such a country has become meaningless and unnecessary. There will be no France friendship group until they make up for their decision,” Çiçek said, stressing that the stance of the Senate, the next legislative stage for the bill, would be crucial. The overwhelming majority of the group’s members belonged to the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP).

    Saturday, 24 December 2011

    HDN

  • Turkish Kiss to Sarkozy and Valerie

    Turkish Kiss to Sarkozy and Valerie

    TolgaalAlain Juppe, the foreign minister of France, urged Türkiye “not to overreact” but Ankara was naturally furious and immediately recalled its ambassador, announced a raft of sanctions and promised they were the first on an escalating list of measures.

     

    • Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan stated France ‘burned Algerians in ovens’
    • Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan stated “This is politics based on racism, discrimination and xenophobia. “
    • Ambassador of Türkiye Tahsin Burcuoglu recalled from Paris today in protest.
    • Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan claimed ‘This is using  Turkophobia and Islamophobia to gain votes, and it raises concerns regarding these issues not only in Francebut all Europe.’

    Türkiye froze political and military relations with France in retaliation for the approval by the French parliament’s lower chamber of a measure that makes it a crime to deny so called genocide against Armenians a century ago.

    Erdogan said Ottoman Türkiye hadn’t committed genocide against Armenians and that his country is proud of its own history.   Türkiye will “take incremental steps and apply them with determination as long as this position continues,” Erdogan said today in Istanbul.

    The French legislation is “unjust, inaccurate and Türkiye condemns it vehemently,” Erdogan stated.  “People will not forgive those who distort history, or use history as a tool for political exploitation.”

    Türkiye accuses French colonialists of massacres in Algeria after Paris bill makes it a crime to deny killings of Armenians in 1915 byOttoman Empire was genocide.

    “France massacred an estimated 15 per cent of the Algerian population starting from 1945. This is genocide,” Mr Erdogan stated, accusing Mr Sarkozy of “fanning hatred of Muslims and Turks for electoral gains.” “This vote that took place in France, a France in which five million Muslims live, clearly shows to what point racism, discrimination and Islamophobia have reached dangerous levels in France and Europe,” he stated. When it comes to massacres French action against Algerian rebels in the aftermath of the Second World War, Mr Erdogan concluded Mr Sarkozy’s father had been a French legionnaire in Algeriain 1945 and should be able to tell his son of “massacres”.

    France fought a long guerrilla war between 1954 and 1962 to try to hang on to its Algerian colony. Estimates for the number of dead vary wildly.Algeriaputs it at more than a million, French historians estimate 250,000.

    Earlier, Türkiye’s ambassador to France had left Paris and Ankara had announced diplomatic sanctions – banning political visits between the countries – and frozen military ties between the theoretical Nato allies.  “We are really very sad. Franco-Turkish relations did not deserve this,” Ambassador Tahsin Burcuoglu said before taking a flight home. “When there is a problem it always comes from the French side.” “The damage is already done. We have been accused of genocide! How could we not overreact? Türkiye will never recognise this story of an Armenian genocide.” he stated.”There are limits. A country like Türkiye cannot be treated like this,” he declared.

    French carmakers including Renault control a fifth of Türkiye’s auto market and French banks including BNP Paribas SA have assets in the country exceeding $20 billion. French direct investment in Türkiye between 2002 and 2010 was $4.8 billion according to Turkish Embassy in Paris.

    Türkiye has been warning France for the past week that its fast-growing economy means it can really hurt companies such as Airbus SAS and Electricite de France SA if the measure goes through.  Türkiye’s economy grew an annual 8.2 percent in the third quarter, a pace only exceeded by China in the world.

    French carmaker Renault SA employs 6,800 people in Türkiye and is pressing on with production because the “French decision is a political development,” said Ibrahim Aybar, chief executive officer of Renault Mais in an interview on CNBC-e television.

    In a conversation with journalists ,“The French bill is counter-productive because the emotional reaction in Türkiye can set back the cause for years,” Pope said by telephone. “That’s why France is so short-sighted to introduce this bill.” Pope stated.

     

     

     

    Tolga Çakır

     

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————-

     

     

     

    “Condemnation without hearing both sides is unjust and un-American”Arthur Tremaine Chester, “Angora and the Turks,” The New York Times Current History, Feb.1923

     

    “Believing Armenophile publicity ‘exaggerated, misconstructed, and abusive,’ [Admiral] Bristol in early 1920 told [Rev.] Barton… that it was contrary to the American sense of fair play to kick a man when he was down and give him a chance to defend himself.”Joseph L. Grabill, “PROTESTANT DIPLOMACY AND THE NEAR EAST: Missionary influence on American policy, 1810-1927,” 1971, p. 264

     

    “…Matter sent to the papers by their correspondents in Turkey is biased against the Turks. This implies an injustice against which even a criminal on trial is protected.”Gordon Bennett, publisher, The New York Herald, circa 1915
    “No Englishman worthy of the name would condemn a prisoner on the evidence of the prosecution alone, without first hearing the evidence for the defence.”C.F. Dixon-Johnson, British author, from his 1916 book, “The Armenians.”

     

    “There is no crime without evidence. A genocide cannot be written about in the absence of factual proof.” Henry R. Huttenbach, history professor who appears to support the Armenian viewpoint exclusively, as do… curiously… nearly all so-called “genocide scholars”; The Genocide Forum, 1996, No. 9
    “It is… time that Americans ceased to be deceived by (Armenian) propaganda in behalf of policies which are… nauseating…”John Dewey, Columbia University professor, “The Turkish Tragedy,”  TheNew Republic, Nov. 1928

     

     

     

     

    For nearly a century, the Western World has wholeheartedly accepted that there has been an attempt by the Ottoman Turks to systematically destroy the Armenian people, comparable to what the Nazis committed upon the Jews during World War II. Many Armenians who have settled in America, Europe and Australia (along with other parts of the world, known as “The Armenian Diaspora”) have clung to the tragic events of so long ago as a form of ethnic identity, and have considered it their duty to perpetuate this myth, with little regard for facts… at the same time breeding hatred among their young. As descendants of the merchant class from the Ottoman Empire, Armenians have been successful in acquiring the wealth and power to make their voices heard… and they have made good use of the “Christian” connection to gain the sympathies of Westerners who share their religion and prejudices.

    Turks characteristically shun propaganda, and have chosen not to dwell on the tragedies of the past, forging ahead to build upon brotherhood — not hate. This is why the horrifying massacres committed upon the Turks, Kurds and other Ottoman Muslims by Armenians have seldom been heard. When such reports are heard, Westerners can be callously dismissive… Turkish lives are apparently as meaningless to them as Indian lives were to most early Americans.

    (The following is an excerpt from Dr. Leon Picon, reviewing the book, “THE ARMENIAN FILE”):

     

  • Turkey moves far beyond Europe

    Turkey moves far beyond Europe

    Cagaptay: Turkey moves far beyond Europe

    Editor’s Note: Soner Cagaptay is a Senior Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and is the co-author, with Scott Carpenter, of Regenerating the U.S.-Turkey Partnership.

    By Soner Cagaptay – Special to CNN

    The Turks are selling pasta to the Italians, educating Papua-New Guineans in their universities, building airports in Egypt, running schools in Nigeria and establishing diplomatic missions in Latin America. Turkey has not felt and acted like the confident global player it is today since the heyday of the Ottoman Empire in the sixteenth century.

    After the decline of the Ottoman Empire in the eighteenth century, the Turks tried to belong to Europe in hopes of eventually becoming an ordinary country subsumed by it. That dream has passed. In the past decade, a new Turkey was born, shaped by unprecedented political stability, domestic growth and new-found commercial and political clout overseas. This has instilled a sense of global confidence in the Turkish people, not seen since Suleiman the Magnificent ruled in Constantinople. “And the new Turkey is here to stay,” says Namik Tan, the Turkish ambassador to Washington.

    Like a Eurasian China, the new Turkey is interested in building influence across the globe and is no longer confined by a regional, European rubric.

    Recently, visiting Istanbul, I attended a conference on the Arab Spring organized by Abant Platform, a local NGO that gathers Turkish intellectuals of different stripes for policy debates. The conference – this time with attendees from Washington, Tel Aviv, London, St. Petersburg and Arab capitals in addition to Turks – debated Turkey’s leadership role in the Arab Spring.

    The venue was Ciragan Palace, a former Ottoman residence on the Bosporus and an apt selection for the new Turkey. Over Turkish coffee served a la Ottoman with double-roasted Turkish delight on the side, Ali Aslan, a Turkish journalist, summed up the new Turkey for me: “Ten years ago, the Turks would not have organized a conference on the Middle East lest this made them look non-European. And if such a conference were ever conceived, it would be run by the government and staged in Ankara, with all the participants making arguments in favor of following Europe’s footsteps.”

    The new Turkey looks beyond Europe and thinks globally for a variety of reasons. Turks feel confident as the world around them suffers from economic meltdown while Turkey booms: In the third quarter of 2011, the Turkish economy grew by a record 8.2 percent, outpacing not only the county’s neighbors, but also all of Europe.

    Furthermore, since 2002, the Turkish economy has nearly tripled in size, experiencing the longest spurt of prosperity in modern Turkish history. The Turkish daily Sabah wrote that in 2011 alone, another 9,755 millionaires joined the country’s wealthy. Just as sudden spread of middle-class prosperity in 1950s United States instilled a can-do attitude in American sentiments towards the world, the same is now happening in Turkey. A young cab driver I spoke with in Istanbul said: “Europe is too small an arena for Turkey; we need to be a global player.”

    Turkish trade is already heading away from Europe. The continent’s economic doldrums coupled with Turkey’s new trans-European vision means that the country’s traditional commercial bonds with Europe are eroding while its trade links with the non-European world flourish. In 1999, for instance, the European Union accounted for over fifty-six percent of Turkish trade. In 2011, this number went down to forty-one percent, while the share of members of the Organization of Islamic Countries in Turkish trade climbed from twelve percent to twenty percent in the same period.

    Paralleling this trend, Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has pursued a foreign policy that transcends Turkey’s European vocation, irreversibly re-molding Turkey’s identity. “After suffering through eight coalition governments and four economic crises, the Turkish people have welcomed ten years of a stable AKP government even if it has meant entrenched single-party rule” says Asli Aydintasbas, a columnist with mainstream Turkish daily Milliyet.

    Elected in 2002 and slated to pick the country’s next president in 2014, the AKP has already run Turkey longer than any other party since Ankara became a democracy in 1946. As it is likely to outlive even Ataturk’s fifteen-year domination of Turkish politics in the early twentieth century, the AKP’s global vision will continue to prevail.

    Buoyed by economic dynamism, political stability, and a new supra-European vision, the Turks have accordingly reached far and abroad to build soft power in places they had earlier ignored, such as the Middle East, Africa and even far-flung countries such as Vietnam and Mongolia.

    The private sector, universities and NGOs are driving this agenda, shaping the new Turkish supra-European identity. This trend can best be observed in cities dominated by the middle class: in Gaziantep, the country’s sixth largest town, as well as other middle-sized towns such as Kayseri, Konya, Malatya, and Denizli. Dubbed “the Anatolian Tigers” for driving the country’s record-breaking growth rate, these towns have also provided solid support to the AKP while linking Turkey to the Middle East, Africa and beyond.

    Gaziantep, near the Syrian border, has factories that manufacture almost everything, selling goods to over 70 countries. The town’s pasta ends up on Italian dinner plates. In this sense, Gaziantep is like an Anatolian Guangzhou, the Chinese hub famous for selling its wares to the most distant and unlikely places.

    But unlike Guangzhou, Gaziantep is also building soft power for Turkey. Zirve University in Gaziantep is a testimony to this. Funded by the local billionaire Nakiboglu family, which made its wealth recently in international commerce, the university has a gleaming campus that rises amid Gaziantep’s famous pistachio groves.

    Visiting this campus is like visiting the new Turkey. Gokhan Bacik, a professor of international relations who studies Turkey’s new active Middle East policy, told me that already, over ten percent of the university’s student body is foreign despite the fact that the university opened only two years ago. Many students hail from the Middle East, especially nearby Syria, as well as the Balkans, Africa, the former Soviet Union, and even Europe. “We have students from Austria and Papua New Guinea,” he added.

    Gaziantep is the epitome of the new Turkey. For years, it was known in Turkey for its heavenly pistachio nut-filled baklavas. Today, shops in the town’s gentrified medieval old city and along tram-lined streets in leafy middle-class districts proudly display the “world’s best baklava,” making a culinary claim to Turkey’s new global identity.

    Additionally, businesspeople from Gaziantep and other Anatolian Tigers are busy financing and managing construction projects across the world, including Cairo’s new airport terminal and major projects from Russia to Mongolia. Others are launching schools to educate future elites in countries around the globe, including Nigeria, Morocco, Brazil, and Vietnam, demonstrating further soft power in the making. Most of these businessmen and schools belong to the Sufi-inspired Gulen Movement, a force to be reckoned with in the new Turkey. Mustafa Sungur, who sympathizes with the movement, says that the “Movement has Turkish schools in almost all countries of the world with the exception of authoritarian places such as North Korea, Iran and Saudi Arabia.”

    In the end, it all comes down to Istanbul. By securing itself in the Middle East, the former Soviet Union, Asia, and Africa, the new Turkey is anchoring these regions in Istanbul. The city was the center of the Ottoman, Byzantine, and Roman empires for 1,700 years, and it is once again reclaiming its dominance as a global capital. Accounting for one-third of Turkey’s 1.1 trillion dollar economy, Istanbul’s wealth already dwarfs all of Turkey’s neighbors, expect for oil-rich Iran.

    Yet, the city reaches even beyond Turkey’s immediate neighbors. Ten years ago, you could fly direct from Istanbul to a mere seventy-five international destinations, most of them in Europe, on Turkish Airlines, the country’s flagship carrier. Today, Turkish Airlines offers direct flights from Istanbul to over 150 international destinations. The majority of the new destinations are in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, including Dhaka, Dar es Salam, and Damman. In Iraq alone, the airline serves six cities, providing the most connections between that country and the outside world, and in December, the company provided the first international connection to Misrata, Libya, beating the competition to reach Libya’s oil capital.

    Turkey’s new global identity is increasingly shaping its foreign policy, as well. Like the country’s national airlines, its diplomats seem to be following Turkey’s businesspeople and reaching even further beyond. In the past decade, Turkey has opened up over forty new diplomatic missions, most of them in Africa and Asia, including Basra, Maputo, Accra, Juba and Yaoundé. It has also set up posts in Latin America and now has diplomatic reach in Bogota and Santiago.

    This posturing suggests that Turkey’s new supra-European identity and global confidence is here to stay. That, of course, requires the Turkish economy to keep humming and the country to remain stable. If Turkey plays its hand well, the same economic factors responsible for facilitating its rise beyond Europe will continue to help it maintain its confident global outlook.

    Take, for instance, Turkey’s current accounts deficit which stands at a whopping 9.8 percent, the highest figure among the forty-two developed economies recently reviewed by The Economist. Most economies cannot sustain such a high deficit, but it is likely that Turkey can due to its position of stability amongst its neighbors, causing a steady flow of money into the country.

    My brother Ali Cagatay, Bloomberg Turkey’s news editor, told me that as much as six billion dollars have flowed into Turkey from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and the former Soviet Union in the first ten months of 2011 alone, helping the country’s economy to finance its deficit. In Hatay province, which borders Syria, bank deposits have increased by 1.1 billion dollars in the past year, thanks to wealthy Syrians who are putting their money into Turkey for safeguarding. “In addition to money coming in from its non-European neighbors, Turkey also attracts massive inflows from European and other Western banks which see Turkish markets as a rare safe haven in these tumultuous times,” adds a Turkish banker based in London.

    This is why it is essential that the new Turkey is a responsible global player. The need for continued stability is the very reason Turkey cannot afford to be a bully. Take, for instance, Ankara’s threats to Israel over the flotilla incident. After Israel refused to apologize, some officials threatened to send the Turkish navy to confront the Israelis. It is in Turkey’s best interest to avoid conflict, which is the reason Ankara stepped away from confrontation with Israel.

    Turkey is confident and can afford to look beyond Europe because it continues to grow. And Turkey grows because it is deemed stable and investment grade while the world around it goes through economic and political convulsions. A belligerent foreign policy and political instability would almost certainly usher in economic instability, ending Turkey’s run for global influence. In short, the new Turkey’s soft power rests on Turkey being a soft country.

    The views expressed in this article are solely those of Soner Cagaptay.