Category: World

  • Denmark: European children fighting for PKK, claims former ROJ TV chief

    Denmark: European children fighting for PKK, claims former ROJ TV chief

    Danish newspaper Berlingske Tidende continues to publish more information about ROJ TV and the PKK. Their most recent report reveals that the PKK is using children-fighters. Pictures taken by former ROJ-TV director, Manouchehr Zonoozi, show youth, the youngest of which is supposedly 14-16, and Zonoozi claims, he saw children in the camps as young as 8-9.
    Putting aside the issue of using children as soldiers, Zonoozi makes another very interesting claim. He says that most children in the camps come from Iran or Europe, and don’t have their parents with them.

    The youngest get school education, the older ones are trained in using weapons, fighting and Kurdish history, with emphasis on the PKK and the movement’s founder, Abdullah Öcalan.

    “In an asylum camp in Iraq, I met a Syrian-origin Kurdish family. They were looking for their daughter, who fled to the PKK. But the PKK didn’t want to give her back to the family. I was really upset at that,” says Manouchehr Zonoozi.

    Berlingske Tidende (Danish)

    IIE

  • North Korean Troops ‘Prepare For Combat’

    North Korean Troops ‘Prepare For Combat’

    2:51pm UK, Tuesday May 25, 2010

    Adam Arnold, Sky News Online

    North Korea’s armed forces have reportedly been ordered to prepare for combat as tensions mount with the South over the deadly sinking of a warship.

    The North’s leader Kim Jong-Il is thought to have told his military to be braced for war, as Seoul blares out its own propaganda into the neighbouring rival country.

    As part of psychological warfare operations, South Korea is placing loudspeakers at the border and is also using radio to broadcast messages into the North.

    South Korea is slashing trade and denying permission for the North’s cargo ships to pass through the South’s waters.

    The tensions also spooked global markets, with the FTSE 100 index of leading British companies falling by more than 2%.

    Seoul has blamed Pyongyang for a torpedo strike that sank the warship Cheonan and killed 46 sailors on March 26.

    A team of international investigators concluded last week that a torpedo from a North Korean submarine tore the Cheonan apart.

    The sinking was the South’s worst military disaster since the 1950-53 Korean War, which ended with an armistice, not a peace treaty.

    The North denies any involvement and has warned retaliation would mean war. It has threatened to destroy any propaganda facilities installed at the heavily militarised border.

    The claim that Kim had told his million-strong armed forces to prepare for combat was made by the South’s state-run Yonhap news agency, citing North Korean observers.

    “We do not hope for war but, if South Korea, with the US and Japan on its back, tries to attack us, Kim Jong-Il has ordered us to finish the task of unification left undone during the… (Korean) war,” Yonhap quoted a May 20 broadcast as saying.

    Pyongyang is already subject to a number of UN-backed sanctions in response to its nuclear weapons and missile programmes.

    The US, which has 28,500 troops in South Korea, has thrown its full support behind its ally’s moves.

    Washington is planning two major military exercises off the Korean peninsula in a display of force intended “to deter future aggression” by the North.

    Also, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is stepping up pressure on China to back international action against North Korea over the sinking of the warship.

    She said peace and security on the Korean peninsula is a shared responsibility between Washington and Beijing.

    Mrs Clinton said the Obama administration expects to work closely with China to “fashion an effective response” to the sinking.

    China, the communist country’s main ally, has remained neutral, but the US wants Beijing to support UN Security Council action against North Korea.

    Sky News Online

  • Filmmaker Jafar Panahi will be freed on bail late today

    Filmmaker Jafar Panahi will be freed on bail late today

    By Ladane Nasseri

    May 25 (Bloomberg) — Iranian filmmaker and opposition supporter Jafar Panahi, who was invited to be a juror at the Cannes film festival, will be freed on bail late today, weeks after directors including Steven Spielberg, Francis Ford Coppola and Martin Scorsese called for his release.

    A bail equivalent to $200,000 was posted, Panahi’s wife, Tahereh Saeedi, told the Iranian Labour News Agency today. “Based on what we are told, he will be released tonight between 7 and 11 p.m.” Iran time.

    “It has been agreed for him to be released on bail and the legal process and the judicial steps are being followed,” Prosecutor General Abbas Jafari-Dolatabadi was quoted as saying yesterday by the state-run Iranian Students News Agency. He didn’t say when the release or further court proceedings in the case would take place.

    Panahi, a backer of the movement that grew out of protests against last year’s disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was detained on March 2. Charges against him include making a movie without a permit and wearing a green scarf, a symbol of the opposition, at a film festival abroad, his wife said last month.

    Saeedi, who was detained with Panahi and later released, has said he was planning to direct a film about the problems of a family of four amid the political unrest prompted by Ahmadinejad’s victory in the June 12 vote.

    Spielberg, Coppola and Scorsese were among directors who signed a petition last month urging the Iranian government to release Panahi, saying filmmakers in Iran “should be celebrated, not censored, repressed and imprisoned.”

    ‘Attack on Art’

    Fellow Iranian film director Abbas Kiarostami, whose film “Certified Copy” premiered at the Cannes film festival, also made an appeal at the event last week for Panahi’s release, the U.K.’s Guardian reported.

    “When a filmmaker is imprisoned, it is an attack on art as a whole,” Kiarostami told reporters, according to the newspaper. “We need explanations. I don’t understand how a film can be a crime, particularly when that film has not been made.”

    French actress Juliette Binoche, who starred in Kiarostami’s film and won the best actress award for the role at Cannes, wept when she heard that Panahi started a hunger strike on May 16, Agence France-Presse reported. Binoche brandished a sign with the name of Panahi as she faced the audience after receiving her award, AFP said on May 23.

    Several of Panahi’s films have been banned in Iran, including “Crimson Gold,” which looks at the privileges of Iran’s upper class through the eyes of a pizza-delivery man and won the Prix Un Certain Regard at Cannes in 2003. Also banned is “The Circle,” which portrays the harsh aspects of life for several women in the Islamic nation. It won the Golden Lion award at the 2000 Venice film festival.

    More recently, Panahi won the second-highest award at the 2006 Berlin film festival with “Offside,” a comic tale about a government ban on women and girls attending soccer games.

    –Editors: Philip Sanders, Heather Langan

    To contact the reporter on this story: Ladane Nasseri in Beirut at lnasseri@bloomberg.net.

    To contact the editor responsible for this story: Peter Hirschberg at phirschberg@bloomberg.net.

    The Bloomberg

  • Sarah Ferguson faces losing royal home after cash for access scandal

    Sarah Ferguson faces losing royal home after cash for access scandal

    ‘Phew, I’ve had a heavy day’: Fergie tries to put on a brave face over £500,000 cash-for-access scandal at star-studded charity dinner

    fergie

    Sarah Ferguson attempted to put on a brave face over the £500,000 cash-for-access scandal last night, telling a charity awards dinner: ‘Phew… I’ve had a heavy day.’

    The ‘penniless’ duchess was at a black tie reception in Los Angeles having flown in from the South of France where she had been a guest at Naomi Campbell’s 40th birthday party.

    She was at the top table alongside Simon Cowell, who was receiving an award for his humanitarian work, and his fiancée Mezhgan Hussainy.

    Meanwhile Prince Andrew was today preparing to hold crisis talks with the Queen after his ex-wife was exposed offering access to him for £500,000.

    The duchess, said to be ‘devastated and regretful’ at being secretly filmed by an undercover reporter posing as a businessman, looked pale and tearful as she arrived at Los Angeles airport.

    But she had changed and looked refreshed for last night’s dinner. She avoided the red carpet and was ushered in through a back door by security men to pick up an award from the Variety charity for her work with underprivileged children.

    Once she was inside an official photographer for the event was only allowed to take pictures of the Duchess while she was on stage.

    She told the audience: ‘Thank you all so very much. When I got on that flight today I thought “Phew, I’ve had a heavy day”.’

    And to roars of laughter, she added: ‘I learned today about making a difference. Most importantly I learned I hate grown-ups and I love children.’

    The reception was held at LA’s  five star Renaissance Hollywood Hotel. She had been expected to stay there but cancelled her reservation after the scandal broke and decided to stay with friends instead.

    The duchess received the Catherine Variety Sheridan Award, which is given each year by the charity to someone for their philanthropic work with underprivileged and disabled children.

    And the master of ceremonies for the event paid tribute to her for attending given the crisis unfolding around her.

    He announced to the audience, which included four former Miss Worlds, that she had told him earlier: ‘Whatever else, I will not let down the children.’

    But several people involved with Variety said she should use the event to apologise publicly.

    Andrew Buskard, director of events for a youth section of the charity in Vancouver, Canada, said before the speech: ‘Yes, I think that would be fitting. The timing, it’s unfortunate. But we are just glad she’s here. I hope all the attention brought to this event isn’t negative. She’s here for a good cause.

    ‘I hope people realise she is here for the charity. Maybe she could make a light joke, maybe it’s too early to joke.

    ‘But definitely a comment would be appreciated because it will be the elephant in the room.’

    The duchess had been filmed by the News Of The World pocketing $40,000 (£27,600) in cash as a down payment for her grubby scheme to give access to her former husband Prince Andrew.

    She was apparently unaware that she had been the victim of a sting until the story broke at around 1am on Sunday as she partied with A-list stars at the Cannes film festival.

    She and elder daughter Beatrice, 21, had joined guests including Jennifer Lopez, Grace Jones and Eva Herzigova for Naomi Campbell’s birthday.

    An insider at the exclusive Eden Roc hotel in Cap D’Antibes told the Daily Mirror: ‘They were dancing along to the Black Eyed Peas, who were performing live.

    ‘They were waving their arms and singing “Tonight’s gonna be a good night” and looked like they were having a brilliant time. Fergie went over to wish Naomi a happy birthday, but then she and Bea suddenly disappeared around 1am. Nobody knew why.’

    It appears this was when an aide broke the news to her that she had been exposed in the News Of The World.

    The revelations appeared to be taking their toll on the duchess as she flew in to Los Angeles. On the flight a fellow passenger said she appeared ‘very, very upset’.

    She looked red-eyed and stunned as she arrived in the U.S. city on an American Airlines flight from Heathrow to attend an awards ceremony where she was honoured for her work with disadvantaged children.

    With her face bare of make-up and her hair scraped back in a bun she was barely recognisable as she walked through arrivals to be met by an American woman who attempted to shield her from the waiting press.

    The 50-year-old, who wore a cream coloured trench with long green scarf, did not respond to questions about the scandal and was escorted from Terminal Four at Los Angeles International Airport around 2.15pm (10.15pm UK time).

    Instead she was quickly ushered into the back of a black Mercedes town car where she looked close to tears and was seen nervously picking at her fingernails


    Prince Andrew arrived back from a visit to Singapore last night as his ex-wife offered to quit his royal residence in the wake of the scandal.

    The duchess’ offer to move out of the royal residence presents her ex-husband with a dilemma. If he accepts Sarah’s offer to move out, he has no idea where she will go or who will pay for her accommodation.

    Prince Andrew

    There is also the risk that, outside the royal fold, she could be a loose cannon causing further mayhem.

    If she stays, he faces the humiliation of being under the same roof as a woman who has, not for the first time, brought shame on the Royal Family.
    A Palace spokesman said Andrew ‘categorically denies any knowledge of any meeting’ between the duchess and a reporter from the News of the World.
    He was said to have spoken briefly on the phone to his ex-wife.
    And in a statement, Fergie apologised for a ‘serious lapse of judgment’ and admitted her financial situation is ‘under stress’.
    The Queen was dismayed by the conduct of her former daughter-in-law and the embarrassment it has heaped on her grandchildren Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.
    The first item on the agenda of the talks with Andrew is whether the duchess’s offer to quit Royal Lodge in Windsor should be accepted.
    ‘We have been here so many times before with the duchess,’ said one senior royal insider. ‘She’s offered to leave before but she never goes.’
    The 50-year-old duchess is also facing a tax investigation after being caught accepting a large cash gift.
    Prince Charles, long a critic of the former Sarah Ferguson, is appalled by her latest errors of judgment.
    And, highly unusually, a government minister has publicly criticised the duchess, breaking the convention that controversies relating to the Royal Household should be above party politics.
    Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone, a Liberal Democrat, said Fergie’s actions appeared ‘shoddy and grubby’.
    She said: ‘There she is saying “Give me money and I will give you access to Andrew”. It’s really depressing. Lord knows what the Queen thinks.’
    In her taped indiscretions, the duchess claimed to be living off the trust funds of her daughters which were funded by the late Queen Mother – the last Duchess of York.
    Friends of the duchess, who is in LA to receive the Catherine Variety Sheridan Award – presented annually to a person in recognition of his or her philanthropic achievements, primarily with underprivileged and disabled children – admitted she had been ‘stupid and naive’ because of the continuing ‘perilous’ nature of her finances.
    During the undercover operation, she made a series of outrageous – and potentially damaging –boasts about her influence over Andrew and her relationship with the Royal Family.
    ‘It is an appalling breach of trust,’ said a source close to Prince Andrew. ‘His reputation is being put at risk by a woman he still loves and has stood by for many years both emotionally and financially.’
    The sting was set up by the News of the World’s Mazher Mahmood – the notorious ‘fake sheik’ whose previous victims have included the Countess of Wessex and Princess Michael of Kent – posing as an international businessman.
    The duchess offered to introduce him to the prince, who works as a UK trade envoy, and boasted that Andrew could help with his international business deals.
    She was filmed accepting a briefcase containing the $40,000 and boasting: ‘Look after me and he (Andrew) will look after you…….you’ll get it back tenfold. I can open any door you want.’
    Last night it was claimed that the duchess had offered to repay the money to the newspaper. But the Labour MP Ian Davidson said: ‘The Inland Revenue should investigate her affairs. Her conduct is absolutely astonishing.’
    A friend of Fergie said: ‘There are no excuses and she knows it. She was suspicious about the set up but her desperation took over. Andrew will be apoplectic and she knows she will now have to extricate herself from the house and move elsewhere –although God knows where she will go. She hasn’t a penny to her name.’
    There is no evidence to suggest that Andrew was aware of his ex-wife’s shameless attempts to cash in on his name and reputation or that he would ever have abused his position as the UK’s Special Representative for Trade and Investment.
    Despite the parlous state of her finances, Fergie has refused to scale back her lavish lifestyle. On Friday, she was pictured drinking wine in the South of France before attending supermodel Naomi Campbell’s 40th birthday party the following day on a yacht.

    If she stays, he faces the humiliation of being under the same roof as a woman who has, not for the first time, brought shame on the Royal Family.A Palace spokesman said Andrew ‘categorically denies any knowledge of any meeting’ between the duchess and a reporter from the News of the World.He was said to have spoken briefly on the phone to his ex-wife.And in a statement, Fergie apologised for a ‘serious lapse of judgment’ and admitted her financial situation is ‘under stress’. The Queen was dismayed by the conduct of her former daughter-in-law and the embarrassment it has heaped on her grandchildren Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. The first item on the agenda of the talks with Andrew is whether the duchess’s offer to quit Royal Lodge in Windsor should be accepted.’We have been here so many times before with the duchess,’ said one senior royal insider. ‘She’s offered to leave before but she never goes.’
    The 50-year-old duchess is also facing a tax investigation after being caught accepting a large cash gift.Prince Charles, long a critic of the former Sarah Ferguson, is appalled by her latest errors of judgment. And, highly unusually, a government minister has publicly criticised the duchess, breaking the convention that controversies relating to the Royal Household should be above party politics.Equalities Minister Lynne Featherstone, a Liberal Democrat, said Fergie’s actions appeared ‘shoddy and grubby’. She said: ‘There she is saying “Give me money and I will give you access to Andrew”. It’s really depressing. Lord knows what the Queen thinks.’In her taped indiscretions, the duchess claimed to be living off the trust funds of her daughters which were funded by the late Queen Mother – the last Duchess of York.

    Friends of the duchess, who is in LA to receive the Catherine Variety Sheridan Award – presented annually to a person in recognition of his or her philanthropic achievements, primarily with underprivileged and disabled children – admitted she had been ‘stupid and naive’ because of the continuing ‘perilous’ nature of her finances. During the undercover operation, she made a series of outrageous – and potentially damaging –boasts about her influence over Andrew and her relationship with the Royal Family.’It is an appalling breach of trust,’ said a source close to Prince Andrew. ‘His reputation is being put at risk by a woman he still loves and has stood by for many years both emotionally and financially.’The sting was set up by the News of the World’s Mazher Mahmood – the notorious ‘fake sheik’ whose previous victims have included the Countess of Wessex and Princess Michael of Kent – posing as an international businessman.The duchess offered to introduce him to the prince, who works as a UK trade envoy, and boasted that Andrew could help with his international business deals.She was filmed accepting a briefcase containing the $40,000 and boasting: ‘Look after me and he (Andrew) will look after you…….you’ll get it back tenfold. I can open any door you want.’

    Last night it was claimed that the duchess had offered to repay the money to the newspaper. But the Labour MP Ian Davidson said: ‘The Inland Revenue should investigate her affairs. Her conduct is absolutely astonishing.’A friend of Fergie said: ‘There are no excuses and she knows it. She was suspicious about the set up but her desperation took over. Andrew will be apoplectic and she knows she will now have to extricate herself from the house and move elsewhere –although God knows where she will go. She hasn’t a penny to her name.’There is no evidence to suggest that Andrew was aware of his ex-wife’s shameless attempts to cash in on his name and reputation or that he would ever have abused his position as the UK’s Special Representative for Trade and Investment.Despite the parlous state of her finances, Fergie has refused to scale back her lavish lifestyle. On Friday, she was pictured drinking wine in the South of France before attending supermodel Naomi Campbell’s 40th birthday party the following day on a yacht.

    The Daily Mail

  • Turkey and the Holocaust

    Turkey and the Holocaust

    By Arnold Reisman

    Arnold Reisman is an engineer and a retired professor of operations research at Case Western Reserve University. Born in Lodz in 1934, he came to the United States after World War II and is the author of numerous books about Holocaust refugees in Turkey, including Turkey’s Modernization: Refugees from Nazism and Ataturk’s Vision (New Academia, 2006).

    Turkey is now center stage in many discussions and policy debates worldwide.  When it comes to the State of Israel and Turkey’s small remaining Jewish community, the news coming out of Turkey is not good.

    But what about the historical relationship between Jews and Turks?  Most historians are quite aware that Jews lived and prospered throughout the Ottoman Empire, and, until the last decade of the Empire’s existence, they prospered in Palestine as well.  But what about the Holocaust, which took place outside of Turkey’s borders?

    Ask a historian what Turkey’s role in World War II and most will answer that Turkey was neutral.  That is correct—at least until Turkey declared war on Germany and Japan on February 23, 1945.

    Ask a historian what Turkey’s role in saving Jews during the Holocaust was and most will say, “I don’t know.”  Some will be very negative and blame Turkey for the Struma—a derelict ship carrying over seven hundred illegal refugees from Romania to Palestine, all but one of whom perished when the ship was towed out of Istanbul by the Turkish Coast Guard and sent adrift in the Black Sea.  Their facts are correct, but the reasons for the tragedy are in great part misdirected.  Turkey had a law which allowed transit rights through its territorial waters for all those who had valid visas to other destinations.  Even after lengthy negotiations spanning three continents, however, Great Britain refused to provide such visas.  For reasons still unknown, the ship was torpedoed by a Soviet submarine.

    Ask a historian if any ships succeeded in transiting Turkey’s territorial waters with Jewish refugees and reached Palestine [illegally] prior the formation of Israel as a state in 1948, and most will say, “I don’t know.”  The fact is that a number of ships did so succeed.  Among these waere the Velos in 1934; the Draga/Eli in 1938; the Assimi, the Rim/Aghios Nickolaos IV, the Astir/Marsis, the Parita, the Tiger Hill and the Sakarya in 1939; the Marien in 1941; and the Milka I, Milka II, the Kazbek, the Belasitsa, and the Salahattin in 1944.  A number of ships with Jewish immigrants also transited Turkey between the end of the war and the formation of the State of Israel in 1948.

    Ask a historian what Turkey’s role was in saving nearly two hundred eminent intellectuals and providing them with jobs commensurate with their academic stature and most will have no idea, even though at least two books have been published on the subject in English (Turkey and the Holocaust by S.J. Shaw and Turkey’s Modernization: Refugees from Nazism and Atatürk’s Vision by Arnold Reisman)

    Tell a historian that among those so saved was Arthur von Hippel, the acknowledged father of nanotechnology; Erich Auerbach, who while in Turkey penned the Mimesis, a seminal text that laid the foundation for a unified theory of representation that spans the entire history of Western literature; Benno Landsberger and Hans G. Güterbock, who after the war made the University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute world-famous; Dr. Rudolph Nissen, famous for developing a widely used operation to prevent esophageal reflux and who performed an exploratory laparotomy on Albert Einstein, and most historians will be astonished to hear about it.

    Lastly, ask a historian about the role of Turkish diplomats in saving close to three thousand Jews with Turkish connections living in France and nearly all will say, “I have never heard of it.” Yet in my forthcoming book Ambassador and a Mentsch: The Story of a Turkish Diplomat in Vichy France, I found, using Yad Vashem’s official population data, that a French Jew without Turkish roots had a 3.7 greater chance of dying in Hitler’s ovens than a French Jew who had Turkish connections.  The reason was the intervention of the Turkish legation staff in both occupied and in Vichy France.  Headed by Ambassador Behic Erkin, the diplomats worked night and day to save Jews, and they did this against the will of their government in Ankara. Thus they were risking their careers while often risking their lives. For this they deserve to be recognized as Righteous Among the Nations even if it means that Yad Vashem will have to change its rules of how these selections are made.  The law of large numbers should be substituted for the three survivor testimonies required in the past.

  • Ban Ki-Moon calls on Turkish youth to take role in world politics

    Ban Ki-Moon calls on Turkish youth to take role in world politics

    United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon called for young people to take an active role in the world of politics in a remarking speech at Boğaziçi University on Friday.

    “As young people living in Turkey you should aim beyond here for broader security and prosperity in the world,” said Ban.

    Referring to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s visit to Greece last week and Turkey’ efforts to come to an agreement with Iran on the exchange of enriched uranium, Ban said Turkey has a dynamic diplomacy and a solid economy in times of crisis.

    He said Turkey’s credibility is increasing more and added that Turkey has three ways to go further in the international arena. First is by increasing its active contribution to the issues in its region and the world. “Turkey has learned the right to speak up, let your voice be heard and clear on the issues of security and peace. You have to become a force of progress in the region,” said Ban.

    Secondly, Turkey should do more efforts to give power to women. Thirdly, the alliance of civilizations, an initiative supported by Turkey and many other states, should be an ongoing project. “I feel proud to be part of this process and the United States will join as the hundredth member. Turkey has been second to none in supporting this initiative and as students of this university you have the power to contribute,” said Ban.

    As a former diplomat from South Korea, Ban made an emotional speech on Turkey’s deployment of troops to Korea back in the early 1950s. “We are all grateful to your sacrifice; you were one of the first to answer the call from the U.N. back then. Turkish soldiers went to fight for liberty and peace in a place where they didn’t know following their government’s orders. Out of 5,000 Turks who fought, nearly 500 of them died, but in the end they were there celebrating the victory with us,” said Ban, adding that Turks and South Koreans have been friends and brothers since then.

    Meanwhile, Ban said the Cyprus issue would definitely be on his agenda on his meeting with Erdoğan on Saturday.

    Hürriyet Daily News