Category: Turkey

  • SEPARATISM AND TERRORISM – SYNERGY OF “ARMENIAN SYNDROME”

    SEPARATISM AND TERRORISM – SYNERGY OF “ARMENIAN SYNDROME”

    ermeni terrorHaving lost their statehood in the IV century, Armenians, scattered around the world, for centuries carried the myth of “Great Armenia” in their genes, which became the matrix of the “Armenian question” that was actively stirred up by the Armenian Gregorian church during the Middle Ages. Since the ХVIII century, in parallel with the Armenian Gregorian Church, the Mekhitarist Congregation was fostering the “Armenian question” both in Europe and in the East, trying to draw the attention of the leading states to the intelligible dream of Armenianism. Long before the San Stefano talks, Armenian colonies in Egypt and India were involved in this agitation work of Armenianism.

    After signing the Treaty of San Stefano, the “Armenian question” was included in the international system and became a source of insurrection of the Armenians. The established Armenian political parties, in the last quarter of the XIX century, have been the ideologists of separatism. And their method of struggle was terrorism, in particular against the Ottoman Empire. To achieve their goal, their centuries-old dream, Armenian nationalist forces decided to organize a series of disturbances in the Ottoman Empire, which could convince the West that Armenians in this country are subjected to the most severe persecution. During this period, the Armenian lobby in the West actively organizes charity committees and organizations to raise public awareness of the “Armenian question” in the European countries and the United States.

    In the midst of the Armenian insurrection in Eastern Anatolia, in June 1895, the “Patriotic Federation of Armenians” was founded in New York. This organization was purposefully supporting the myth of “Great Armenia”. Armenian separatists sought to attract France to their intelligible dream, which at the time had a sober approach to the “Armenian question”: the French envoy in Istanbul considered it inappropriate to establish the Armenian statehood in Eastern Anatolia.

    Unable to realize their delusional dream in the Ottoman Empire and left without the support of the European powers, Armenian nationalists have decided to transfer the battle to the Caucasus, where they begin an open struggle against the Russian Empire. Because Russia, properly assessing the existing socio-political situation in the region, is taking certain steps, such as, for example, closing the Armenian parish schools in the Caucasus, imposing sequestration of  June 12, 1903 on the Armenian Gregorian Church which played a major role in Armenianism, uniting the Ottoman and Russian Armenians under the idea of the formation of “Great Armenia”.

    In response, total Armenian terror begins throughout the Caucasus. And here the “Dashnaktsutyun” party played first fiddle, which in the early XX century, held a huge real power – the 100-thousand army of Chetniks.  Officials of all ranks of the Caucasian administration were subjected to Armenian terror, for example, the supreme commander for civil affairs in the Caucasus G. S. Golitsyn, Baku governor M. Nakashidze, who took an active part in localizing the activities of Armenianism in the region.

    During World War I, Armenian terrorism erupted into bright flames and was characterized by its extreme cruelty. The mythical idea of “Great Armenia”, which was supposed to cover the six vilayets of Eastern Anatolia, gave new impetus to the activities of Armenian terrorists. After the Battle of Sarikamish, having decided to take advantage of the existing situation, Armenianseparatists begin to act as a “fifth column”.  Units of Armenian militants assisted the Russian army in the capture of Bayezid, and, taking advantage of the advent of the Caucasian Army towards Van, Armenian insurgents, according to Georges de Maleville, under the leadership of the Dashnak Aram and Varil, captured Van and exterminated the Muslim Turks, expelling them from the territories that were included in the “Van state.”  Taking advantage of the occupation of the eastern part of Asia Minor by the Russian troops, Armenian militants massacred not only Turks here, but also Jews. During World War I, in the Ottoman Empire alone, 10 thousand Jews were killed by Armenian thugs.

    While studying this issue, Western scholars S. Shaw, Georges de Maleville, Justin McCarthy, Eric Feigl, based on indisputable facts, proved that during World War I the armed forces of Armenian separatists killed more than two million Muslim Turks, Kurds, Azerbaijanis in the area, covering the geographical area from the Aegean to the Mediterranean Sea and from the Black Sea to the Caucasus.

    The physical extermination of the Azerbaijani people continued during the Bolshevik-Dashnak-Hunchak rule, by an ardent nationalist S. Shaumian and his gangs in the Baku Province. Unable to realize the myth of “Great Armenia”, S. Shaumian subjected the Azerbaijani people to genocide in the spring of 1918. According to partial estimates, during this chronological period, more than 40 thousand Azerbaijanis were exterminated in the Baku Province alone. And during the Dashnak rule, 200.000 Azerbaijanis were killed in the Iravan Province.

    All these facts incontrovertibly highlight the historical realities of that period and turn the mythical “Armenian genocide” into a “bubble”. The myth that embodies a synergy of the “Armenian syndrome”, by carrying separatism and Armenian terror.

    Hajar Verdiyeva, Doctor of Historical Sciences

  • Wembley Stadium arch in red after terror attack outside Besiktas Stadium

    Wembley Stadium arch in red after terror attack outside Besiktas Stadium

    wembley

    AA

    LONDON

    The arch at Wembley Stadium was illuminated in the colors of the Turkish flag Sunday to show solidarity with Turkey in the wake of a deadly terror attack in Istanbul the previous day.

    “Wembley’s arch is red tonight as a mark of respect and sympathy following the attacks outside Besiktas’ stadium in Turkey yesterday,” the English Football Association said on its official Twitter account.

    At least 38 victims were killed in the attack, including 30 police officers and seven civilians, according to Turkish Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu. One victim has yet to be identified, he said.

  • : The Queen’s Riddle

    : The Queen’s Riddle

    The Queens Riddle!!!

    At the start of his tenure as president, Obama while visiting

    the UK had dinner with the Queen. Obama, wanting to learn as

    much as he could about governance, leaned toward her and asked;

    image001 13

    “Your Majesty, how do you run such an efficient government? Are there any tips you can give me?”

    image002 12

    “Well,” said the Queen, “The most important thing is to

    surround yourself with intelligent people.”

    image003 9

    Obama frowned, and then asked, “But how do I know if the

    people around me are really intelligent?”

    The Queen took a sip of champagne.

    image004 7

    “Oh, that’s easy; you just ask them to answer an

    intelligent riddle, watch.” The Queen pushed a button

    on her intercom. “Please send Tony Blair in here, would you?”

    image005 3

    Tony Blair walked into the room and said, “Yes, your Majesty?”

    image006 1

    The Queen smiled and said, “Answer me this please, Tony.

    Your mother and father have a child.It is not your brother,

    and it is not your sister. Who is it?”

    image007 2

    Without pausing for a moment, Tony Blair answered,

    ”That would be me.”

    image008 1

    “Yes! Very good.” said the Queen.

    image009

    Obama went back home to ask Joe Biden the same question.

    “Joe, answer this for me. Your mother and your father have

    a child. It’s not your brother and it’s not your sister. Who is it?”

    “I’m not sure,” said Biden.

    image010

    “Let me get back to you on that one.”

    He went to his advisors and asked everyone, But none within

    the administration could give him an answer. He even called

    Hillary, she said, “Send in a donation, and I’ll put my whole

    staff on it. Frustrated, Biden went to work out in the congressional

    gym and saw Paul Ryan there.

    image011

    Biden went up to him and asked, “Hey, Paul, see if you can

    answer this question. “Your mother and father have a child,

    and it’s not your brother or your sister. Who is it?”

    image012

    Paul Ryan answered, “That’s easy; it’s me!”

    image013

    Biden smiled, and said, “Good answer, Paul!” Biden then

    went back to speak with President Obama.

    “Say, I did some research, and I have the answer to that riddle.”

    image014

    “It’s Paul Ryan!”

    Obama got up, stomped over to Biden, and angrily yelled into his face,

    image015

    “NO, you idiot! It’s Tony Blair!”

    image016

    …AND THAT, MY FRIENDS, IS PRECISELY WHAT’S BEEN

    GOING ON AT THE WHITE HOUSE FOR THE PAST EIGHT

    YEARS!

  • Many police injured in Istanbul Besiktas stadium blasts

    Many police injured in Istanbul Besiktas stadium blasts

    ISTANBULDA BUYUK PATLAMA….CANLI BOMBA OLABILIR…

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38276794

    image001 9

    At least 20 police officers have been injured in explosions near a football stadium in Istanbul, Turkey’s interior minister says.

    Suleyman Soylu said it was thought a car bomb had specifically targeted riot police.

    Ambulances and police were seen rushing to the scene, and TV footage showed a fire burning outside the stadium.

    Turkey has seen a recent spate of militant attacks in major cities that have left dozens of people dead.

    The blast on Saturday happened two hours after a football match at the Vodafone Arena between Besiktas and Bursaspor, two of Turkey’s top teams, ended.

    Local media reported that fans had already dispersed. Bursaspor posted on Twitter that none of its fan groups knew of any injured fans.

    Mr Soylu said: “It is thought to be a car bomb at a point where our special forces police were located, right after the match at the exit where Bursaspor fans exited, after the fans had leftimage002 7

    “We have no information on the number of dead. God willing we hope there won’t be any.”

    Photographs posted on Instagram after the explosion showed helmets strewn on a road.

    Image copyright Reuters Image caption Photographs have started to emerge of police helping their injured colleagues

  • The U.S. Weighs Its Nuclear Options

    The U.S. Weighs Its Nuclear Options

    North Korea's steadfast commitment to developing a nuclear arsenal is just one of the many tricky issues with which the next U.S. president will have to contend. (JUNG YEON-JE/AFP/Getty Images)
    North Korea’s steadfast commitment to developing a nuclear arsenal is just one of the many tricky issues with which the next U.S. president will have to contend. (JUNG YEON-JE/AFP/Getty Images)

    Forecast

    • Nuclear weapons issues will be a big part of the next U.S. president’s agenda.
    • North Korea will continue its nuclear program, and the United States will have little leeway to contain or counter it.
    • As India and Pakistan amend their military doctrines, the presence of tactical nuclear weapons will increase the risk of nuclear conflict in the region.
    • Although the United States’ cornerstone arms control agreements with Russia are increasingly fragile, the next administration may be able to renegotiate them.

    Analysis

    When U.S. President-elect Donald Trump assumes office in January, an array of vexing foreign policy and security challenges will await him. Between conflicts in the Middle East, the enduring standoff with Russia, competing claimants in the South China Sea and upheaval in the European Union, the next administration will have its hands full. On top of these, Trump will have to contend with matters of nuclear weapons proliferation, balance and arms control, pressing concerns that are sure to command attention.

    A Nuclear North Korea

    Foremost, Trump will have to decide how to address North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. Once a means to exact political and economic concessions from rival powers, the program has since becomea cornerstone of the country’s national security policy. Pyongyang is no longer interested in negotiating over its nuclear program and instead regards it as the ultimate deterrent against attack. In light of this development — and the steady progress that North Korea is making toward a viable nuclear arsenal — the United States will be compelled to respond yet will be limited in its options to counter the emerging nuclear power. Sanctions have so far done little to deter Pyongyang from pursuing its nuclear ambitions. At the same time, military intervention is a risky proposition given the dearth of intelligence on North Korea, the threat of retaliation and the consequences of a full-scale war.

    north-korea-missiles.png?itok=X17p6467

    With so few options at its disposal, Washington will be left to build up its anti-ballistic missile defenses. But here, too, the United States will run into complications, not only from China and Russia, which oppose such efforts by the United States, but also from its regional allies, Japan and South Korea. Lingering grudges between Tokyo and Seoul will make it difficult for Washington to coordinate a unified response. As North Korea ramps up its missile testing cycle, meanwhile — and as South Korea adopts increasingly aggressive policies to pre-empt an attack from the North — the prospect of armed confrontation grows ever more likely.

    Standoff in South Asia

    Over the next four years, the United States will also have to contend with a heightened risk of nuclear conflict in South Asia. Long-standing disputes between India and Pakistan occasionally flare up, as recent violence in Kashmir has shown, and each country will keep revising and adapting its military doctrine in an effort to contain or defeat the other. On both sides of the rivalry, nuclear weaponry has become an important component of military strategy.

    Pakistan-Tactical-Nuclear-Weapons-120516.png?itok=o4E5enHY

    Pakistan has assembled an impressive arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons to compensate for conventional military capabilities that pale in comparison with India’s. (Islamabad also must secure its border with Afghanistan, where insurgent fighting has been on the rise.) In the event of war, Pakistan hopes that its collection of low-yield nuclear weapons would be enough to overcome a large-scale Indian offensive. New Delhi’s current nuclear policy prohibits first use, and Islamabad reasons that using nuclear weapons in its own territory would stop India from escalating an attack. India, however, has repeatedly stated that it would respond in kind if Pakistan were to resort to nuclear weapons, even within its borders. In fact, India’s defense minister has called for New Delhi to reconsider its policy on first use — though he was quick to clarify that those were his own views and that the country’s official stance had not changed. Some members of India’s defense policy circles have even suggested that the country amass a tactical nuclear arsenal of its own to keep the upper hand on Pakistan.

    Fragile Arms-Control Agreements

    As the Trump administration evaluates the United States’ policy toward Russia, it will find that the countries’ differences are not limited to issues such as Ukraine and Syria. Though it has weathered its share of challenges since its signing in 1987, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) is facing its biggest trial yet. The treaty, a foundational arms-control agreement, bans ground-based nuclear or conventional missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (300 to 3,400 miles) and eliminated thousands of destabilizing nuclear weapons, particularly in Europe.

    kr-500-missile-range-121516.jpg?itok=ya3Eh6cZ

    But Russia increasingly feels that the treaty puts it at a disadvantage relative to the United States, which has continued tomodernize its nuclear arsenal and develop its ballistic missile defenses. Washington has begun to question the agreement as well because it does not extend to China’s land-based missiles. In 2014, the United States formally accused Russia of developing missiles in breach of the treaty, namely the R-500 ground-based cruise missile and the SS-27 Mod 2 intercontinental ballistic missile, which Moscow started testing at ranges prohibited by the INF. Russia, in turn, has alleged that the United States’ deployment of Mk41 launchers in Europe — along with its development and use of armed drones with ranges in excess of 500 kilometers — violates the terms of the agreement.

    china-new-missiles-range-120516.jpg?itok=RgWSMwrs

    The New START treaty, which aimed to reduce the number of strategic nuclear missile launchers by half, may also be in peril — albeit less than the INF. Conducting inspections in April, the United States reportedly discovered that Russia was improperly disposing of SS-25 mobile missiles and could not verify that missiles slated for elimination had been destroyed. Furthermore, Russia has fallen far behind in eliminating warheads, raising doubts about its intent or ability to comply by the February 2018 deadline. Efforts to extend the treaty by another five years, postponing its expiration date to 2026, have also failed to gain much traction given the acrimonious relationship between Moscow and Washington.

    The Trump administration may usher in an era of improved relations between the United States and Russia, as the president-elect has hinted. Washington, moreover, stands a better chance of stabilizing its fragile arms-control agreements with Moscow than of changing the nuclear balance in South Asia or on the Korean Peninsula. Regardless, nuclear weapons issues will figure prominently throughout the next four years, requiring a significant amount of attention from the next administration.

  • No wonder AMERIKA is in debt

    No wonder AMERIKA is in debt

    Expenses caused by first ladies ..INCLUDING OBAMA

    Who is the Queen Bee of Them All?
    Copyright Canada Free Press

    Total Personal Staff members for US First ladies Mamie Eisenhower: One – paid for personally, out of President’s salary.

    Total number of Personal Staff Members paid by Tax Payers

    Jackie Kennedy: One

    Lady Bird Johnson: One

    Pat Nixon: One

    Betty Ford: One

    Rosaline Carter: One

    Barbara Bush: One

    Hilary Clinton: Seven

    Laura Bush: One

    Michele Obama: Twenty-two

    Yep….your eyes don’t deceive you. You want to read WASTE? ….Scroll on down.

    Michele Obama’s personal staff: Take a closer look

    One.. $192,200 – Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)

    Two.. $160,000 – Frye, Jocelyn C. (Director of Policy And
    Projects)

    Three.. $133,000 – Rogers, Desiree G. (White House Social
    Secretary)

    Four.. $122,000 – Johnston, Camille Y. (Director of
    Communications)

    Five.. $120,000 – Winter, Melissa (Deputy Chief Of Staff)

    Six.. $110,000 – Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff)

    Seven.. $104,000 – Lilyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press
    Secretary)

    Eight.. $ 95,000 – Starkey, Frances M. (Director of
    Scheduling and Advance)

    Nine.. $ 90,000 – Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy
    and Projects)

    Ten.. $ 85,000 – Burnough, Erinn (Deputy Director and
    Deputy Social Secretary)

    Eleven.. $ 84,000 – Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and
    Deputy Social Secretary)

    Twelve.. $ 82,000 – Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of
    Scheduling and Events Coordinator)

    Thirteen.. $ 80,000 – Fitz, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance
    and Trip Director)

    Fourteen.. $ 77,500 – Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and
    Personal Aide)

    Fifteen.. $ 72,500 – Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director
    and Deputy Press Secretary)

    Sixteen.. $ 70,000 – Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for
    Scheduling and Traveling Aide)

    Seventeen.. $ 65,000 – Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of
    Correspondence)

    Eighteen.. $ 63,000 – Tubman, Samantha A. (Deputy Associate
    Director, Social Office)

    Nineteen.. $ 60,000 – Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to
    the Chief Of Staff)

    Twenty.. $ 56,000 – Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the
    Social Secretary)

    Twenty-One.. $ 55,000 – Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)

    Twenty-Two.. $ 55,000 – Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate
    Director of Correspondence)

    That’s a Total…$2,075,200 in annual salaries – all for someone we did not vote for and apparently have no control over

    5 staff are Muslim and 13 African-American.

    There has NEVER been anyone in the White House, at any time, who has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady’s social life.

    This does not include:

    “Makeup artist” Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49,

    “First Hairstylist” Johnny Wright, 31,

    Both of whom traveled aboard Air Force One on ALL Trips, Europe included.

    As of 11/15/2015 the Obama Family has spent over $1,300,000,000 (one billion, three hundred million dollars) on personal family trips. They were personal, not political or Government related.

    How things have changed! If you’re one of the tens of millions of Americans facing certain destitution, earning less than subsistence wages stocking the shelves at WalMart or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers, prepare to scream and then come to realize that the benefit package for these servants of “Ms.
    Michelle” are the same as members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for these assorted lackeys is paid by YOU the American public..

    Copyright Canada Free Press

    Yes…… The Canadian Free Press had to publish this, perhaps because America no longer has a free press and the USA media is afraid that they might be considered racist.