Category: Turkey

  • Turkey and Russia Moving Closer

    Turkey and Russia Moving Closer

    Global Research, February 26, 2009

    Despite the problems of the ruble and the weak oil price in recent months for the Russian economy, the Russian Government is pursuing a very active foreign policy strategy. Its elements focus on countering the continuing NATO encirclement policy of Washington, with often clever diplomatic initiatives on its Eurasian periphery. Taking advantage of the cool relations between Washington and longtime NATO ally, Turkey, Moscow has now invited Turkish President Abdullah Gul to a four day state visit to discuss a wide array of economic and political cooperation issues.

    In addition to opening to Turkey, a vital transit route for natural gas to western Europe, Russia is also working to firm an economic space with Belarus and other former Soviet republics to firm its alliances. Moscow delivered a major blow to the US military encirclement strategy in Central Asia when it succeeded earlier this month in convincing Kyrgystan, with the help of major financial aid, to cancel US military airbase rights at Manas, a major blow to US escalation plans in Afghanistan.

    In short, Moscow is demonstrating it is far from out of the new Great Game for influence over Eurasia.

    Warmer Turkish relations

    The Government of Prime Minister Recep Erdogan has shown increasing impatience with not only Washington policies in the Middle East, but also the refusal of the European Union to seriously consider Turkey’s bid to join the EU. In the situation, it’s natural that Turkey would seek some counterweight to what had been since the Cold War overwhelming US influence in Turkish politics. Russia’s Putin and Medvedev have no problem opening such a dialogue, much to Washington’s dismay.

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul paid a four-day visit to the Russian Federation from February 12 to 15, where he met with Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, and also travelled to Kazan, the capital of Tatarstan, where he discussed joint investments. Gul was accompanied by his state minister responsible for foreign trade, and Minister of Energy, as well as a large delegation of Turkish businessmen. Foreign Minister Ali Babacan joined the delegation.

    Visit to Tatarstan

    The fact that Gul’s Moscow visit also included a stop in Tatarstan, the largest autonomous republic in Russian Federation whose population mainly consists of Muslim Tatar Turks, is a sign how much relations between Ankara and Moscow have improved in recent months as Turkey has cooled to Washington foreign policy. In previous years, Moscow was convinced that Turkey was trying to establish Pan-Turanism in the Caucasus and Central Asia and inside the Russian Federation, a huge concern in Moscow. Today clearly Turkish relations with Turk entities inside the Russian Federation are not considered suspicious as it was once, confirming a new mood of mutual trust.

    Russia elevated Gul’s trip from the previously announced status of an ‘official visit’ to a ‘state visit,’ the highest level of state protocol, indicating the value Moscow now attaches to Turkey. Gul and Medvedev signed a joint declaration announcing their commitment to deepening mutual friendship and multi-dimensional cooperation. The declaration mirrors a previous ‘Joint Declaration on the Intensification of Friendship and Multidimensional Partnership,’ signed during a 2004 visit by then-President Putin.

    Turkish-Russian economic ties have greatly expanded over the past decade, with trade volume reaching $32 billion in 2008, making Russia Turkey’s number one partner. Given this background, bilateral economic ties were a major item on Gul’s agenda and both leaders expressed their satisfaction with the growing commerce between their countries.

    Cooperation in energy is the major area. Turkey’s gas and oil imports from Russia account for most of the trade volume. Russian press reports indicate that the two sides are interested in improving cooperation in energy transportation lines carrying Russian gas to European markets through Turkey, the project known as Blue Stream-2. Previously Ankara had been cool to the proposal. The recent completion of the Russian Blue Stream gas pipeline under Black Sea increased Turkey’s dependence on Russian natural gas from 66 percent up to 80 percent. Furthermore, Russia is beginning to see Turkey as a transit country for its energy resources rather than simply an export market, the significance of Blue Stream 2.

    Russia is also eager to play a major part in Turkey’s attempts to diversify its energy sources. A Russian-led consortium won the tender for the construction of Turkey’s first nuclear plant recently, but as the price offered for electricity was above world prices, the future of the project, awaiting parliamentary approval, remains unclear. Prior to Gul’s Moscow trip, the Russian consortium submitted a revised offer, reducing the price by 30 percent. If this revision is found legal under the tender rules, the positive mood during Gul’s trip may indicate the Turkish government is ready to give the go-ahead for the project.

    Russia’s market also plays a major role for Turkish overseas investments and exports. Russia is one of the main customers for Turkish construction firms and a major destination for Turkish exports. Similarly, millions of Russian tourists bring significant revenues to Turkey every year.

    Importantly, Turkey and Russia may start to use the Turkish lira and the Russian ruble in foreign trade, which could increase Turkish exports to Russia, as well as weakening dependence on dollar mediation.

    Post-Cold War tensions reduced

    However the main message of Gul’s visit was the fact of the development of stronger political ties between the two. Both leaders repeated the position that, as the two major powers in the area, cooperation between Russia and Turkey was essential to regional peace and stability. That marked a dramatic change from the early 1990’s after the collapse of the Soviet Union when Washington encouraged Ankara to move into historically Ottoman regions of the former Soviet Union to counter Russia’s influence.

    In the 1990’s in sharp contrast to the tranquillity of the Cold War era, talk of regional rivalries, revived ‘Great Games’ in Eurasia, confrontations in the Caucasus and Central Asia were common. Turkey was becoming once more Russia’s natural geopolitical rival as in the 19th Century. Turkey’s quasi-alliance with Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Georgia until recently led Moscow to view Turkey as a formidable rival. The regional military balance developed in favor of Turkey in Black Sea and the Southern Caucasus. After the disintegration of the USSR, the Black Sea became a de facto ‘NATO lake.’ As Russia and Ukraine argued over the division of the Black Sea fleet and status of Sevastopol, the Black Sea became an area for NATO’S Partnership for Peace exercises.

    By contrast, at the end of the latest Moscow visit, Gul declared, ‘Russia and Turkey are neighboring countries that are developing their relations on the basis of mutual confidence. I hope this visit will in turn give a new character to our relations.’ Russia praised Turkey’s diplomatic initiatives in the region.

    Medvedev commended Turkey’s actions during the Russian-Georgian war last summer and Turkey’s subsequent proposal for the establishment of a Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform (CSCP). The Russian President said the Georgia crisis had shown their ability to deal with such problems on their own without the involvement of outside powers, meaning Washington. Turkey had proposed the CSCP, bypassing Washington and not seeking transatlantic consensus on Russia. Since then, Turkey has indicated its intent to follow a more independent foreign policy.

    The Russian aim is to use its economic resources to counter the growing NATO encirclement, made severe by the Washington decision to place missile and radar bases in Poland and the Czech Republic aimed at Moscow. To date the Obama Administration has indicated it will continue the Bush ‘missile defense’ policy. Washington also just agreed to place US Patriot missiles in Poland, clearly not aimed at Germany, but at Russia.

    Following Gul’s visit, some press in Turkey described Turkish-Russian relations as a ‘strategic partnership,’ a label traditionally used for Turkish-American relations. Following Gül’s visit, Medyedev will go to Turkey to follow up the issues with concrete cooperation proposals. The Turkish-Russian cooperation is a further indication of how the once overwhelming US influence in Eurasia has been eroded by the events of recent US foreign policy in the region.

    Washington is waking up to find it confronted with Sir Halford Mackinder’s ‘worst nightmare.’ Mackinder, the ‘father’ of 20th Century British geopolitics, stressed the importance of Britain (and after 1945 USA) preventing strategic cooperation among the great powers of Eurasia.

    F. William Engdahl is author of A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order (Pluto Press) and Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation (www.globalresearch.ca ). His new book, Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order (Third Millennium Press) is doe for release in late Spring 2009. He may be reached via his website: www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net .

  • Clinton’s Travel to the Middle East and Europe

    Clinton’s Travel to the Middle East and Europe

    Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Travel to the Middle East and Europe
    Robert Wood

    Acting Department Spokesman, Office of the Spokesman

    Bureau of Public Affairs

    Washington, DC

    February 26, 2009

    Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will travel to Egypt, Israel, the Palestinian Territories, Belgium, Switzerla nd, and Turkey from March 1-7, 2009.

    Secretary Clinton will attend and participate in the donor’s conference for Gaza recovery hosted by Egypt on March 2. Special Envoy for Middle East Peace George Mitchell and other high-level representatives will be in attendance in Sharm el-Sheikh with the Secretary during the conference. The Secretary also will meet with senior Egyptian officials.

    After the conference, Secretary Clinton will travel to Israel and the Palestinian Territories and meet with senior officials.

    In Brussels, Secretary Clinton will attend an informal meeting of NATO Foreign Ministers on March 5, where she will consult with Allies and seek consensus on the approach to the upcoming NATO Summit. The Secretary also will attend a meeting with foreign ministers from all NATO and EU countries, as well as Switzerland, to further boost transatlantic relations.

    Also in Brussels, Secretary Clinton will meet separately with EU officials.

    In Geneva, Secretary Clinton will meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to discuss a number of issues of mutual interest, including possibilities for a follow-on agreement to START, and deepening our cooperation in areas such as Afghanistan.

    While in Ankara Secretary Clinton will meet with key Turkish officials.

  • 2 Boeing workers killed in Amsterdam crash

    2 Boeing workers killed in Amsterdam crash

    Two Boeing employees were among nine people who died in the crash of a Turkish Airlines jetliner near Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and a third was hospitalized, the aerospace company said late Thursday.

    By Seattle Times staff and The Associated Press

    Two Boeing employees were among nine people who died in the crash of a Turkish Airlines jetliner near Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and a third was hospitalized, the aerospace company said late Thursday.

    The company is waiting for notification from the State Department about the condition of a fourth Boeing employee, the company says on its Web site.

    Boeing spokesman Jim Proulx on Wednesday identified the four Boeing employees as Michael Hemmer, Ronald Richey, John Salman and Ricky Wilson. The company on Thursday declined to say which two of the four were killed or who was injured, citing the families’ wishes.

    The four men were aboard Turkish Airlines Flight 1951 that slammed into a muddy field Wednesday morning, two miles from the runway at Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport. Authorities in the Netherlands said nine — five Turks and four Americans — of the 135 people aboard the Boeing 737-800 died.

    “This is a very sad day for our company,” Jim McNerney, Boeing chief executive officer, said on the company Web site. “Our thoughts and prayers are with our colleagues’ families, friends and co-workers and with the families of everyone who was on the flight.”

    All the Boeing employees on the plane were based in the Puget Sound area and were traveling on Boeing business. All four worked for Boeing’s defense division on the Turkish “Peace Eagle” program, the company said.

    A woman who identified herself as a family friend answered the phone at the Hemmer residence in Federal Way earlier Thursday. While she was unsure of Hemmer’s status, she said the family assumes he survived the crash. Hemmer’s wife and brother were on the way to Amsterdam, said the woman, who declined to give her name.

    She said she and another family friend are caring for the Hemmers’ children.

    There was no answer at the homes of Salman, Richey or Wilson.

    In Amsterdam, meanwhile, the head of the agency investigating the accident said engine trouble may have caused the crash.

    Chief investigator Pieter van Vollenhoven said, in remarks quoted by Dutch state television NOS, that the Boeing 737-800 had fallen almost directly from the sky, which pointed toward the plane’s engines having stopped. He said a reason for that had not been established.

    Spokeswoman Sandra Groenendal of the Dutch Safety Authority added that engine failure was still only “one of the possible scenarios” for the crash.

    Van Vollenhoven said a preliminary finding would not be made until an analysis of the plane’s flight-data recorders in Paris could be completed.

    Survivors said engine noise seemed to stop suddenly; the plane shuddered and then fell out of the sky tail-first. Witnesses on the ground said the plane dropped from about 300 feet.

    Haarlemmermeer Mayor Theo Weterings said the names of the victims would not be released until the bodies had been formally identified.

    At the crash site Thursday, investigators took detailed photos, trying to piece together why the plane lost speed and crashed.

    One survivor, Henk Heijloo, said the last message he heard from the captain was for the flight crew to take their seats. He said it took him time to realize the landing had gone wrong.

    “We were coming in at an odd angle, and I felt the pilot give the plane more gas,” he said. He said he thought the pilot might have been trying to abort the landing, because the nose came up.

    He then realized the landing was too rough to be normal, and he felt an enormous crash a moment later.

    He walked away apparently uninjured, but his body began aching Thursday, he said.

    Turkish Airlines chief Temel Kotil said the captain, Hasan Tahsin Arisan, was an experienced former air force pilot.

    Turkish officials said the plane was built in 2002.

    Turkish Airlines officials issued a statement Thursday denying reports that the plane had had technical problems in the days before the accident.

    It confirmed that the plane had undergone routine maintenance Feb. 19 and that it had to delay a flight Monday to replace a faulty caution light.

    A retired pilot who listened to a radio exchange between air traffic controllers and the crew shortly before the crash said he didn’t hear anything unusual.

    “Everything appeared normal,” said Joe Mazzone, a former Delta Air Lines captain. “They were given clearance to descend to 7,000 feet.”

    The recording was posted by the Web site LiveATC.net.

    “Turkish 1951 descending from level 7-0,” one of the pilots said as they neared the airport, referring to the plane’s altitude of 7,000 feet.

    The controller cleared the plane to descend to 4,000 feet, where it would intercept an electronic beam guiding the plane to the runway.

    The controller then read out the proper radio frequency for requesting clearance to land. “Turkish 1951 contact the tower 11827, bye bye,” he said

    “Thank you, sir,” the pilot said. There was no indication of trouble in his voice.

    Weather at the airport at the time was cloudy with a slight drizzle.

    Boeing’s 737, built at the company’s plant in Renton, is the world’s best-selling commercial jet, with more than 6,000 orders since the model was launched in 1965.


  • 2008 Human Rights Report: Turkey

    2008 Human Rights Report: Turkey

    pdf (239 KB)download:

    2008 Human Rights Report: Turkey
    BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR
    2008 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices
    February 25, 2009

    Source:

    Promoting freedom and democracy and protecting human
    rights around the world are central to U.S. foreign policy.
    The values captured in the Universal Declaration of Human
    Rights and in other global and regional commitments are
    consistent with the values upon which the United States was
    founded centuries ago. The United States supports those
    persons who long to live in freedom and under democratic
    governments that protect universally accepted human
    rights. The United States uses a wide range of tools to
    advance a freedom agenda, including bilateral diplomacy,
    multilateral engagement, foreign assistance, reporting and
    public outreach, and economic sanctions. The United States
    is committed to working with democratic partners,
    international and regional organizations, non-governmental
    organizations, and engaged citizens to support those
    seeking freedom.
    The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor leads
    the U.S. efforts to promote democracy, protect human
    rights and international religious freedom, and advance
    labor rights globally.

    ==================

  • Lots of blame to go around for ‘losing’ Turkey

    Lots of blame to go around for ‘losing’ Turkey

    Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2009

    By DOMINIQUE MOISI

    Dominique Moisi is a visiting professor at Harvard University and the
    author of “The Geopolitics of Emotions.” © 2009 Project Syndicate

    CAMBRIDGE, Mass.  “Who lost Turkey?” That question, often raised in
    the past, has been heating up in the aftermath of Prime Minister Recep
    Tayyip Erdogan’s emotional outburst during the recent World Economic
    Forum 2009 in Davos, when he abruptly left a panel he was sharing with
    Israeli President Shimon Peres.

    And the Turkish question matters greatly, because it touches on some
    of the most unstable and unsettling of the world’s diplomatic disputes.

    If Turkey has indeed been “lost,” those responsible include the
    European Union, the United States, Israel and Turkey itself. The EU’s
    growing reservations about Turkey’s membership have been expressed
    unambiguously by French President Nicolas Sarkozy. In the U.S., former
    President George W. Bush gets some of the blame because of the war in
    Iraq. Israel, too, has played its part in Turkey’s alienation from the
    West, as a result of the Lebanon war of 2006 and its recent military
    operations in Gaza.

    All of these events have disturbed and disoriented Turkey, and are
    magnified by the domestic impact of worst global economic crisis since
    the 1930s.

    Of course, Turkey’s secular, pro-Western elites may still consider the
    EU and the U.S. important, if not indispensable, allies and partners,
    and they may consider Islamic fundamentalism, Hamas, Hezbollah and
    Iran real or at least potential threats. Yet they are also convinced
    that Europe has behaved improperly toward Turkey, through a
    combination of short-term populist reflexes and the absence of a
    long-term strategic vision.

    The Turkish question is, of course, complex. Turkey’s geography is
    predominantly Asian, Turkey’s emotions are increasingly Middle
    Eastern, i.e., Muslim on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and yet
    Turkey’s elites remain resolutely pro-Western and pro-European. But
    for how long?

    At the beginning of the 21st century, when dialogue with the Islamic
    world is one of the Western world’s key challenges, Europe would
    commit a historic strategic blunder if it were to close its doors to
    Turkey. To do so would push back the inheritors of the Ottoman Empire
    back onto an Asian, Muslim and Middle Eastern historical trajectory.

    In the question of Turkish accession to the EU, the journey matters
    more than the destination. The reforms that Turkey has already
    implemented in a very short period of time, thanks to its EU candidate
    status, are impressive. Should we in Europe really put at risk that
    progress by expressing an all-too-audible “no”?

    The EU desperately needs a strategic and diplomatic partner that can
    significantly reinforce its clout in the Middle East. Europe also
    needs the dynamism of a youthful Turkey. Above all, it needs the
    message of reconciliation sent to Islam that Turkey’s entrance into
    the union would represent.

    Of course, to want Turkey “in” is an act of will, if not an act of
    faith that is in many ways counterintuitive. Most Europeans do not
    perceive Turkey as a “European Other” but as a “non-European Other.”
    Even in Istanbul, the most Westernized of Turkish cities, as soon as
    one leaves the main arteries, one seems to be immersed in a Middle
    Eastern or Asian culture.

    Israel is not in the European Union, but it, too, is in great danger
    of losing Turkey. Far from reinforcing Israel’s security, its last two
    military adventures, in Lebanon and now in Gaza, have caused further
    self-isolation and loss of world sympathy. Nowhere has this phenomenon
    been stronger than in Turkey, where those military escapades have
    strained the two countries’ strategic alliance almost to the breaking
    point.

    It is too early to speak of Obama’s policy toward Turkey; suffice it
    to say that in his willingness to open a respectful dialogue with
    Islam, he is the only Western leader to move in the right direction.
    But can positive American gestures toward Turkey, a key NATO member,
    be sufficient to offset Israel’s insensitive, if not reckless,
    policies? The answer is unclear.

    Turkey, too shares some of the responsibility for this mounting
    process of estrangement. Erdogan’s behavior in Davos was, at the very
    least, irresponsible. He may have gained popularity back home, but in
    today’s difficult economic times, the temptations of cheap populism
    are more dangerous than ever. One does not play lightly with matches
    next to a pile of dry wood.

  • Turkish plane crash in Amsterdam

    Turkish plane crash in Amsterdam

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7909887.stm

    Editor’s Choice

    Nine dead in Turkish plane crash

    A Turkish Airlines plane has crashed on landing at Amsterdam’s Schiphol international airport, killing nine people.

    The plane, with at least 135 passengers on board, crashed short of the runway near the A9 motorway and suffered significant damage.

    Aviation expert Chris Yates gives his reaction to the accident.

    SEE ALSO

    • Airport authorities on crash(01.18)
    • Hudson plane pilot recording(00.53)
    • Ditched helicopter inquiry begins(03.14)
    • Eyewitness describes plane crash(05.19)