Category: News

  • Turkey to send troops to Libya at Tripoli’s request: Erdogan

    Turkey to send troops to Libya at Tripoli’s request: Erdogan

    ANKARA (Reuters) – Turkey will send troops to Libya at the request of Tripoli as soon as next month, President Tayyip Erdogan said on Thursday, putting the north African country’s conflict at the center of wider regional frictions.

    Libya’s internationally recognized Government of National Accord (GNA) has been fending off a months-long offensive by General Khalifa Haftar’s forces in eastern Libya, which have been supported by Russia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates.

    Last month, Ankara signed two separate accords with the GNA, led by Fayez al-Serraj, one on security and military cooperation and another on maritime boundaries in the eastern Mediterranean.

    The maritime deal ends Turkey’s isolation in the East Mediterranean as it ramps up offshore energy exploration that has alarmed Greece and some other neighboring states. The military deal would preserve its lone ally in the region, Tripoli, which is surrounded by Haftar’s forces.

    “Since there is an invitation (from Libya) right now, we will accept it,” Erdogan told members of his AK Party in a speech. “We will put the bill on sending troops to Libya on the agenda as soon as parliament opens.”

    The legislation would pass around Jan. 8-9, he said, opening the door to deployment.

    However, it was unclear what specific invitation Erdogan was referring to, as the interior minister in the Tripoli-based government, Fathi Bashagha, suggested in comments to reporters in Tunis that no such official request had yet been made.

    “If the situation escalates and then we have the right to defend Tripoli and its residents… we will submit an official request to the Turkish government to support us militarily so we expel the ghost of mercenary forces,” Bashagha said on Thursday.

    Haftar’s forces were not immediately available for reaction to Erdogan’s comments.

    For weeks Ankara has flagged the possibility of a military mission in Libya, which would further stretch its armed forces less than three months after it launched an incursion into northeastern Syria against a Kurdish militia.

    FILE PHOTO: Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan leaves after the Global Refugee Forum at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, December 17, 2019, REUTERS/Denis Balibouse

    Turkey has already sent military supplies to the GNA despite a United Nations arms embargo, according to a U.N. report seen by Reuters last month.

    Erdogan visited Tunisia on Wednesday to discuss cooperation for a possible ceasefire in neighboring Libya. On Thursday, he said Turkey and Tunisia had agreed to support the GNA.

    TENSION WITH RUSSIA

    Moscow has voiced concerns over a possible Turkish military deployment to Libya in support of the GNA. Erdogan has said Turkey will not stay silent over mercenaries from the Kremlin-linked Wagner group supporting Haftar.

    “Russia is there with 2,000 Wagner (fighters),” Erdogan said on Thursday, also referring to some 5,000 fighters from Sudan in Libya. “Is the official government inviting them? No.”

    “They are all helping a war baron (Haftar), whereas we are accepting an invitation from the legitimate government of the country. That is our difference,” he added.

    Haftar’s eastern-based Libyan National Army has been trying since April to take Tripoli from the GNA, which was set up in 2016 following a U.N.-brokered deal. The UAE and Egypt have for years provided military support for Haftar’s forces, U.N. reports have said.

    Russian mercenaries have put more pressure on the GNA and “accelerated this quid pro quo between Tripoli and Ankara,” said Sinan Ulgen, a former Turkish diplomat and chairman of the think-tank Center for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies.

    Slideshow (3 Images)

    “So the troop deployment must happen right away, but the risk is that Turkey is being sucked into a military game where the only path is more engagement and escalation,” he added.

    Turkish and Russian officials held talks in Moscow this week to seek a compromise on the issues of both Libya and Syria, where Russia backs President Bashar al-Assad.

    In the Mediterranean, Turkey is at loggerheads with Greece, Cyprus, Egypt and Israel over rights to resources off the coast of the divided island of Cyprus. Athens says Ankara’s maritime deal with Tripoli violates international law.

    Additional reporting by Nevzat Devranoglu in Ankara, Ulf Laessing in Cairo, and Ahmed Tolba and Nadine Awadalla in Tunis; Writing by Daren Butler; Editing by Jonathan Spicer and Gareth Jones

    Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
  • 10 of the Greatest Female Warriors in Ancient History

    10 of the Greatest Female Warriors in Ancient History

    History’s pages are full of bloodshed on the battlefield, and those great men and women that dared to lead the ranks have the honor of being remembered for centuries, if not millennia. However, most often than not, we hear of the greatest male commanders in ancient history, with many notable female warriors being left unheard of. The stories of these 10 great warrior women are worth repeating and remembering, as their achievements were equally as remarkable and admirable, as those of Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, or Napoleon.

    1. Lagertha (12 century)

    A lithography depicting Lagertha (1913) by Morris Meredith Williams
    The 12th-century chronicles of “Gesta Danorum” (Deeds of the Danes) by Saxo Grammaticus tell the story of a legendary shieldmaiden named Lagertha, the ruler of Norway. Lagertha and other women under her leadership are said to have participated in battle concealed as men after King Siward had been killed and overthrown by the Swedish king.
    Among her exploits are her leadership of a fleet counting 120 ships in aiding her ex-husband, famous Viking Ragnar Lodbrok, to silence a revolt in Denmark, a move that ensured his victory. Today, the image of Lagertha is believed to be a collective representation of female Viking warriors rather than a reference to a concrete person. Those of you who have seen the popular “Vikings” show on the history channel may also recall her being one of the main characters on the show, as well as Ragnar.

    2. Lakshmibai, the Rani of Jhansi (1828 – 18 June 1858)

    Like
    Rani Lakshmibai’s statue in Solapur Image source: Dharmadhyaksha/ Wikimedia Commons
    Lakshmibai was the ruler of the Jhansi state in North India, ousted from her kingdom in her early twenties after her husband’s sudden departure. Instead of giving way to British occupation, however, Lakshmibai joined the resistance and soon became the leader of the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
    Alas, her attempts at preserving the Jhansi throne would never come to fruition. After two years of fighting against the British, she and her army would be defeated in June of 1858. Still, the courageous queen would ultimately become the symbol of nationalism and resistance to the British Raj, and today, several statues commemorating her efforts have been erected in India.

    3. Tomoe Gozen (c. 1157 – 1247)

    Like
    Tomoe Gozen and Fan Kuai, an 1824 Print by Yashima Gakutei
    This is a story of a samurai warrior commander named Tomoe, who is known for her incredible bravery and fighting skills that helped her overcome prejudice and fight alongside other samurai. According to “The Tale of Heike”, she was “a remarkably strong archer, and as a swordswoman, she was a warrior worth a thousand, ready to confront a demon or a god, mounted or on foot.”
    Tomoe Gozen participated in the Genpei War (1180-1185), where she earned her reputation and was even considered the first general of Japan after she had escaped from captivity and killed the rivaling Honda no Moroshige of Musashi and Uchida Ieyoshi. In 1184, Minamoto no Yoshinaka, her general, would be defeated during the Battle of Awazu. Tomoe Gozen managed to escape the battlefield, but after that tragic event, she swore to never fight again, so her army career came to an end.

    4. Khutulun (c.1260-c.1306)

    Like
    Khutulun daughter of Qaidu, a medieval miniature (1410-1412)
    Khutulun was a Mongol noblewoman and a wrestler. Her father, Qaidu, became the khan of the Chagatai Khanate, a large division of the Mongol Empire in 1280. Qaidu endorsed his daughter’s wrestling training, and she subsequently accompanied him on a number of military campaigns. Marco Polo described Khutulun as a superb warrior, as did historian Rashid al-Din Hamadani, also pointing out that she was the favorite child.
    Khutulun even attempted to become the successor to the throne after her father’s death in 1301, however, she was unsuccessful. According to legends, Khutulun had also wrestled her suitors, and only those who’d win would become her husband, forfeiting horses to her if they lost. As a result, she gained 10,000 horses, but no husband, and she subsequently married one of her father’s companions.

    5. Khawla bint Al-Azwar

    Khawla was one of the members of the family of noblemen that supported the conquest of Syria, Palestine, and Jordan from the Byzantine Empire.

    As one of the earliest converts to Islam, Khawla and her family, particularly her brother Dhiraar Bin Azwar, actively participated in the Rashidun Army, with Khawla managing to save her brother from captivity during the Siege of Damascus, supposedly leading the troops concealed as the famous general Khalid Bin Walid on an occassion, and even starting a revolt after being taken prisoner by the Byzantine army. Certainly, these accomplishments explain why, even today, many places in Saudi Arabia are named after her.

    6. Fu Hao (died c. 1200 BC) 

    Like
    Tomb and Statue of Lady Fu Hao
    Fu Hao, or Lady Hao, was one of the 60 wives of Emperor Wu Ding of ancient China’s Shang Dynasty. Breaking more modern convention, but not that of the time, Fu Hao also served as a military general and high priestess. Though little information remains of her military accomplishments today, as her life preceded the invention of paper, she is known to have led 13.000 soldiers and was the most powerful general of her time.
    In 1976, Fu Hao’s tomb had been unearthed, and the contents of her burial support both her high rank and supposed accomplishments. Fu Hao died at the age of 33 of reasons unknown, buried with a great assortment of pricey military equipment, such as great battle-axes, other treasures, namely hundreds of jade, bronze, bone, and stone objects, as well as 16 human sacrifices and 6 dogs, as was customary. Fu Hao was subsequently deified and remains the only female head of the army in Ancient China.

    7. Artemisia II of Caria

    Like
    Artemisia, Queen of Halicarnassus, shooting arrows at the Greeks at the Battle of Salamis, from the 1868 painting by Wilhelm von Kaulbach (left); Carian coinage device depicting Artemisia (right), Image Source: Wikimedia Commons
    Artemisia was the 5 century BC Queen of Halicarnassus, a kingdom that once stood in modern-day Turkey. Named after the courageous goddess of hunt Artemis, Artemisia was an outstanding naval commander, most well known for being an ally to Persian King Xerxes during his invasion of a number of Greek city-states.
    Definitely the most notable and most well recorded is Herodotus’ account of the Battle of Salamis, during which Artemisia managed to trick the Greeks into believing that she is their ally by sinking one of Xerxes’ ships while simultaneously making Xerxes, who watched the battle unfold from the ground, believe she sank a Greek vessel. In history, she will always be remembered as cunning, independent, and loyal to no one but herself.

    8. Ching Shih (1775–1844)

    Meet the most successful pirate in history, a woman who terrorized anyone who dared enter the China Seas in the early 19th century. She commanded over 300 ships manned by 20,000-40,000 men, women, and even children. Ching Shih inherited her pirate fleet after her husband’s death and had been in open conflict with the Chinese Qing Dynasty, the British and the Portuguese Empires.
    In a surprising turn of events, Ching Shih and all other pirates were given amnesty by Imperial China with the ability to retain their wealth, an opportunity they took advantage of, and Ching Shin ended up leading a gambling operation until her death at the age of 69.
    Related Article: 33 Photos of Strong and Brave Women in History

    9. Joan of Arc (c.1412-May 30,1431)

    Like
    Joan of Arc (1865), a painting by John Everett Millais

    Joan of Arc is not only a legendary warrior, but also a Roman Catholic saint. By the age of 17, Joan became a commander of the French army, and her strategics revolutionized the French battle model. Joan was supposedly lead by her visions of the Archangel Michael and managed to convince King Charles VII of France to let her participate in the Siege of Orleans, a battle that ended victoriously for Joan and the French in nine days.

    However, in 1430, Joan was captured and put on trial by the English for cross-dressing and heresy. On May 30, 1431, at the age of 19, Joan was sentenced to death by burning alive at the stake. Centuries later, in 1920, Joan was deified and proclaimed one of the patron saints of France.

    10. Boudicca

    Like
    Around 60 AD, Boudicca, a widow of the king of the Celtic tribe Iceni, united 100.000 at her command to fight back against the Romans, fearing the demise of her family and her tribe. The Briton woman who dared defy Rome is remembered as a national hero of Britain for her spirited rebellion and victories in the hopeless war against the Roman Empire, defeating a Roman legion and sacking two fortified towns.
    Though ultimately unsuccessful, her attempt to liberate her people and defend the honor of British women has become legendary. In 1902, a bronze statue (seen above) was erected at the western side of Westminster Bridge in London to commemorate her outstanding courage.
  • Recollect These 10 Major News Stories From This Decade

    Recollect These 10 Major News Stories From This Decade

    Edited By: Bhavesh Bhimani

    The year 2019 is coming to a close, and at the end of this year, we also see the culmination of the current decade. As we get ready to welcome the new year, it would perhaps be a good time to pause and look back on those 10 years gone by.

    The 2010s, like every decade before it, were an eventful time. There were plenty of incidents and stories that grabbed the headlines each year. Most of these we have forgotten about as more prominent news replaced them.  Here is a list of major news stories from each of the past 10 years that will perhaps help refresh your memory.

    2010: The Original iPad Was Launched

    The Apple iPad has become a part of our lifestyle. Not many would remember, though, that it’s been 9 years since it first came out. On January 27, 2010, co-founder and CEO of Apple Inc., Steve Jobs, now deceased,  introduced the iPad at a special event. When it was launched in April 2010, the iPad immediately caught the fancy of everyone. Also known as a ‘First Generation’, the device had a 9.7-inch screen at 1024×768 and 132ppi. It also included the Apple A4, Apple’s first branded processor.

    Today, we are already in the ‘Third Generation’ of the iPad and the gadget has added a number of interesting features to make it more user-friendly. However, the original iPad still holds nostalgic value to the users who had bought it back when it was a new invention.

    2011: Osama bin Laden Killed by U.S. Forces

    In 2011, notorious terrorist Osama bin Laden was killed by the U.S forces. Bin Laden was the mastermind behind the September 11th terrorist attacks in the United States on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. The 54-year-old leader of Al Qaeda was on the FBI’s “most wanted” list for over a decade as he evaded capture. He was finally traced to a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, by the CIA and other intelligence officials.

    On May 2, 2011, a team of Navy SEALs raided the compound, found Osama in an upstairs bedroom and shot and killed him on the spot. The news of Osama’s death caused widespread celebrations across America and it also gave a modicum of closure to countless bereaved families who had lost their loved ones in the September 2011 attack.

    2012: World doesn’t End on December 21, 2012, as Prophesied

    For years it was speculated that the world as we know it would end on December 21, 2012. The basis of these speculations was the prediction by ancient Mayans who had recorded the date of the end of the world on their calendar thousands of years ago. It was one of the most famous doomsday predictions for years and as the big date drew nearer, countless theories and rumors began floating around on how the world would actually end. Some believed there would be a great natural disaster, such as the tidal wave that would wipe every living being on earth. There were also some theories about earth colliding with a mysterious “Planet X” that would lead to magnetic pole shifts or a massive black hole that would devour our solar system.

    However, December 21st, 2012, came and went like any other day. The world breathed a sigh of relief. Most claimed that they had never believed the doomsday theories but there was no denying that many had been sucked into the hype of the end-of-the-world phenomenon.

    2013: South African President Nelson Mandela Dies at 95

    On December 5, 2013, Nelson Mandela, president of South Africa, breathed his last at the age of 95. One of the pioneers of the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, Mandela was known as a freedom fighter, an activist and a civil rights leader.

    Mandela had a difficult life. He served 27 years in prison after being charged with conspiracy to overthrow the government by the use of violence. This was known among many as a thin excuse to quiet him as a political voice in South Africa.  During his years in prison, Mandela’s reputation grew exponentially. He was widely regarded as the most influential black leader in South Arica and his role in the anti-apartheid movement made him an icon for resistance all over the world. Four years after his release from prison, Mandela took office as the first democratically elected President of South Africa on May 10, 1994.

    Nelson Mandela always fought for the freedom of his people. Even today, he remains a symbol of hope and virtue for the world. If you’d like to learn more about him, we recommend his incredible autobiography The Long Road to Freedom.

    2014: Girl Swept Away in Tsunami 10 Years Ago Reunited With Family

    Raudhatul Jannah was just 4 years old when the devastating Indian Ocean tsunami had ravaged her Indonesian town on December 26, 2004. When the tsunami hit her home, little Raudhatul was holding on to her parents along with her then 7-year-old brother, Arif Pratama Rangkuti. Unfortunately, Raudhatul and her brother were swept away in the vicious force of the tsunami. The parents searched for their children for months but the two kids weren’t seen again and were presumed dead.

    10 years later, in what almost felt like a scene from a movie, the parents were reunited with Raudhatul. It turned out that Raudhatul was swept onto a remote island in the nearby Aceh Barat Daya district. There an elderly woman raised her for the next 10 years until she was found by Raudhatul’s uncle one day by accident. After confirming that the girl, then 14 years of age, was indeed his niece, the uncle happily took her back home. It was an overwhelmingly emotional moment for the parents who couldn’t believe that they were being reunited with their little girl who they felt they had lost forever.

    Raudhatul told her parents that her brother is likely to have survived as well and the search for him is still on.

    2015: China Ends One-Child Policy

    China officially ended its controversial one-child policy in 2015 after signing into law a bill that allowed married couples to have two children. The one-child policy was introduced in the late 1970s in China and restricted most couples to having only a single child. The policy was strongly enforced by the authorities by enacting penalties on offenders and frequent sex-selective abortions. This led to a great amount of heartbreak and frustration for countless would-be parents.

    Eventually, China faced a looming population crisis and gender imbalances because of this rule. Thankfully, the authorities finally saw reason and ended the hugely contentious one-child policy.

    2016: Harambe the Gorilla’s Death Triggers Widespread Shock and Grief

    In a highly unfortunate incident, Harambe, a 17-year-old silverback gorilla, was shot dead at Cincinnati Zoo when a 4-year-old kid fell into his enclosure. The confused and agitated gorilla was seen dragging the little boy around like a rag doll, leading to panic among the visitors and especially the mother of the child. Fearing that the boy’s life was in danger, the zoo authorities killed Harambe with a single shot.

    Harambe’s death sparked off heated internet debates about the welfare standards in the zoo and whether there was an actual need to kill the gorilla. There was an outpour of grief and shock over the animal’s death and candlelit vigils were held in his memory. As the news about the incident spread, Harambe’s face was even used as a meme to spread awareness about animal safety.  

    2017: The ‘#MeToo’ Movement Takes the World by Storm

    (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

    The ‘#MeToo’ hashtag became a battle slogan for countless women across the world in late 2017 to share their horrifying sexual harassment stories openly. The trigger for the movement was a New York Times story in early October 2017 that detailed decades of allegations of sexual assaults against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. This led to widespread protests and spurred over 19 million tweets on Twitter on the subject. The news eventually became a mass movement by women to express similar sexual harassment stories faced by them and to raise awareness and support on the topic. The ‘Me Too’ movement has since then spread to many countries and has become an important tool for women to fight back against their long-time harassers.

    2018: The Royal Wedding Captivates the World

    The world was enamored as it got the opportunity to witness a royal wedding in 2018. Prince Harry of Sussex married actress Meghan Markle at St. George’s Chapel in Windsor in May 2018 with a total of about 600 guests in attendance. The wedding was watched by an estimated 29.2 million people and was the most talked-about event for days preceding and following. Meghan Markle’s 16.5-foot long veil also became a subject of hot discussion among internet users and sparked off a spree of memes on social media.

    2019: First-Ever Photo of a Black Hole is Captured

    The black hole has fascinated scientists and researchers for decades. NASA has described the black hole as “a place in space where gravity pulls so much that even light can not get out”. The gravity is so strong there because matter has been squeezed into a tiny space.

    For a long time, this elusive cosmic entity appeared to be out of reach of humans and the mysteries of what lies inside the black hole have been a subject of many discussions and theories for a number of years. In April 2019, astronomers were finally able to capture the first-ever image of a black hole. It was a titanic moment in human history and will hopefully leave the doors open to more answers on the mysteries of this subject.

    Here is hoping that the coming decade will bring better news for the world and we will have some great positive stories to share by the end of it

  • Trump says Armenia massacres were not genocide, directly contradicting Congress

    Trump says Armenia massacres were not genocide, directly contradicting Congress

    President Donald Trump listens during a meeting about the Governors Initiative on Regulatory Innovation

    The Trump administration has said it does not consider the mass killings of Armenians in 1915 to be a genocide, contradicting a unanimous vote by the US Senate.

    The historic vote last week incensed Turkey, which has always denied that the killings amounted to a genocide.

    Turkey’s foreign ministry on Friday summoned the US ambassador to express its anger over the vote, accusing the US of “politicising history”.

    Armenia says 1.5 million were killed in an effort to wipe out the ethnic group.

    The killings took place in the waning days of the Ottoman Empire, the forerunner of modern-day Turkey.

    “The position of the administration has not changed,” said State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus in a statement on Tuesday. “Our views are reflected in the president’s definitive statement on this issue from last April,” she said.

    In a statement last April on the anniversary of the killings, Mr Trump said the US paid tribute to the victims of “one of the worst mass atrocities of the 20th century”, but he did not use the word genocide. Instead he encouraged Armenians and Turks to “acknowledge and reckon with their painful history”.

    Armenian refugees at a camp in 1915

    In the wake of two votes last week in the US House and Senate to recognise the massacres as genocide – a long-awaited symbolic victory for Armenians – Turkey’s authoritarian president Recip Tayyip Erdogan threatened to shut down Incirlik air base, which is based in Turkey and hosts US nuclear warheads.

    Mr Erdogan also said he could close Kurecik radar base as a threat of US sanctions hung over Turkey after its recent military offensive in Syria.

    He called the votes – known as simple resolutions – “worthless” and the “biggest insult” to Turkish people. Simple resolutions do not bind the president, leaving him free to ignore them.

    The Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, hailed the Congress and Senate resolutions as “a bold step towards serving truth and historical justice”.

    A previous effort at passing the resolution through the Senate was blocked by Senator Lindsay Graham – a staunch Trump ally – at the instruction of the White House.

    • Q&A: Armenian genocide dispute
    • US House says Armenian mass killing was genocide
    • US Senator blocks Armenian genocide resoution

    There is general agreement that hundreds of thousands of Armenians died when the Ottoman Turks deported them en masse from eastern Anatolia to the Syrian desert and elsewhere in 1915-16. They were killed or died from starvation or disease.

    The total number of Armenian dead is disputed. Armenians say 1.5 million died. The Republic of Turkey estimates the total to be 300,000. According to the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS), the death toll was more than a million.

    Media captionArmenia mass killings explained in 60 seconds

    Armenia mass killings explained in 60 seconds

    The dispute about whether it was genocide centres on a question of premeditation – the degree to which the killings were orchestrated. Many historians, governments and the Armenian people believe they were; but some scholars have brought that into question.

    Turkish officials accept that atrocities were committed but argue that there was no systematic attempt to destroy the Christian Armenian people. Turkey says many innocent Muslim Turks also died in the turmoil of war.

    Mr Trump gave a warm welcome to Mr Erdogan in Washington DC last month, despite a recent invasion by Turkey of north-east Syria that targeted the Kurds – formerly US allies in the region. The invasion infuriated many US politicians and military officials and led to calls on the president to impose sanctions on Turkey.

    During a meeting in Washington last month, Mr Trump said he was a “big fan” of Mr Erdogan, ignoring widespread criticism over the Turkish president’s poor human rights record.

    Mr Trump predecessor, Barack Obama, promised as a presidential candidate to recognise the massacres of Armenians as genocide but after his election did not use the word.

  • Erdogan’s power grab should worry Nato

    Erdogan’s power grab should worry Nato

     The Times

    Erdogan’s power grab should worry Nato

    The Turkish president is reshaping the western alliance’s second-biggest army in his own image

    This month Recep Tayyip Erdogan, president of Turkey, attended commemorations for the anniversary of the death of Kemal Ataturk, the general who beat Britain and its allies at Gallipoli and went on to found the Turkish republic. The day is designed to humble any living Turkish leader. Erdogan walked behind soldiers carrying a wreath picked out with the Turkish flag through the neo-classical promenade and plaza of Anitkabir, Ataturk’s mausoleum in the heart of Ankara.

    In the sarcophagus hall, he bowed his head to the body of the only man who still rivals him in Turkey, as the Last Post and the national anthem were played. The soldiers saluted Ataturk, not Erdogan.

    But as he walked back outside, the tables turned. A chorus went up…

    Continue reading

    Subscribe to The Digital Pack

    for instant access
    thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/digital/

  • Erdoğan’s power grab

    Erdoğan’s power grab

    The Taksim Square in Istanbul | Chris McGrath/Getty Images

    What the upcoming referendum means for Turkey.

    By

    Updated

    ISTANBUL — The cure-all for Turkey’s ills is close at hand — if you believe Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: a ‘yes’ result in next month’s referendum would restore security and stability, the president promises.

    Yet opposition leaders warn that switching to a presidential system of government, as proposed by Erdoğan, would threaten democracy. To foreign observers, this may be strange to hear. After all, a number of democracies are governed by an executive presidency, among them the United States.

    But in Turkey’s case, the term is used as shorthand for a constitutional reform package that — if approved — would represent the most radical political change since the modern republic’s foundation in 1923.

    Critics, including the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission, fear the new constitution would mark a point of no return for the country’s slide into authoritarianism.

    At its core, the overhaul proposed by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) would replace Turkey’s parliamentary model of government with a presidential system, handing President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan executive powers. Erdoğan would become both head of state and head of government — on paper, like the presidents of the U.S., Mexico, or Cyprus.

    Erdoğan has invoked the U.S. model to soothe fears of authoritarian rule while also insisting that Turkey would design its own system. In January, the government finally laid out the plans for his “Turkish-style” model, proposing a powerful executive presidency and a significantly diminished parliament.

    “Presidentialism à la Turca is a recipe for disaster. Whoever receives this much power would be in a position to abuse this much power” — Aykan Erdemir, Foundation for Defense of Democracies

    In a report released this month, the Venice Commission saw “little resemblance” between Turkey’s proposals and the American model, noting that the amendments “would confer substantially more power on the president, and include substantially fewer checks and balances” than in the U.S. — an argument echoed by many of Erdoğan’s opponents.

    “A presidential system doesn’t necessarily mean the erosion of the separation of powers,” said Aykan Erdemir, a fellow at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies and former MP for the main opposition party CHP. “But presidentialism à la Turca is a recipe for disaster. Whoever receives this much power would be in a position to abuse this much power.”

    Ahead of the April 16 referendum, here’s a guide to the proposed changes.

    A powerful president …

    The existing Turkish constitution ascribes a mainly ceremonial role to the president, with the power largely in the hands of the prime minister and parliament — in theory, at least.

    Ever since Erdoğan became Turkey’s first directly elected president in 2014, after more than a decade as prime minister and leader of the AKP, he has expanded the office beyond its constitutional limits, effectively remaining in charge of the country. A state of emergency imposed in the aftermath of last summer’s failed coup has allowed him to rule by decree.

    A rally in Istanbul in support of Erdoğan | Ozan Kose/AFP via Getty Images

    Under the new constitution, the temporary powers granted to Erdoğan by emergency law would become permanent. While parliament would retain its legislative role, the president could simply bypass parliament by issuing decrees with the force of law.

    “It’s a paradigm shift,” said Bertil Emrah Oder, a professor of constitutional law at Istanbul’s Koc University. Currently, she noted, presidential decrees have to be approved by the cabinet — a check on the president’s power that would no longer exist if the referendum passes.

    The government argues that presidential decrees cannot alter existing laws or fundamental rights and freedoms. However, this changes under emergency law, according to Oder. “If a state of emergency is declared, he could, in fact, regulate even these rights and freedoms,” she said.

    Erdoğan has flouted the neutrality rule since becoming president and repeatedly campaigned on behalf of the AKP.

    The constitutional changes abolish the role of prime minister. Instead, Erdoğan could appoint one or several vice-presidents. The president would be able to appoint his own cabinet, selecting and firing ministers and other senior officials without needing approval from parliament. He would be responsible for the annual budget and national security policy.

    On top of that, the president may be partisan. The current constitution requires the president to be neutral and give up any party affiliation — a law that casual Turkey-watchers may be unaware of, as Erdoğan has flouted the rule since becoming president and repeatedly campaigned on behalf of the AKP.

    … and a weakened parliament

    Parliament would keep some powers — to declare war, for instance. But its ability to control the executive is restricted under the new constitution.

    While the president retains his right to dissolve parliament whenever he wishes, lawmakers have few resources to rid themselves of the president: the impeachment process is complex, requiring the support of an absolute majority in parliament and the approval of the Constitutional Court. And the president appoints a number of Constitutional Court members.

    The constitutional amendments also revoke several checks on the executive, including parliament’s right to issue motions of censure (a formal strong rebuke), votes of no confidence or oral questions to the executive. Lawmakers may only raise written questions.

    “Taking the general ineffectiveness of impeachment procedures into account, that cannot be regarded as sufficient checks and balances,” said Oder. Given the strict party discipline in Turkey, the president — who would keep his position as party leader — would have significant control over parliament, she added.

    A shop in the Mahmutpasa district in Istanbul | Ozan Kose/AFP via Getty Images

    Parliament’s power to legislate is also weakened. Currently, the president may return bills to parliament to be reconsidered, but lawmakers can bypass his objections with a simple majority. Yet under the new constitution, the president gains veto rights on any law, a power that parliament can only override with an absolute majority.

    Erdoğan and his supporters argue that these changes would reduce instability and prevent political stalemates created by any competing power centers. The government has dismissed suggestions that the new constitution would pave the way for more autocratic rule, insisting that the amendments would hand more power to the people, not the president.

    “In the current system, society elects parliament, and parliament forms a government. That’s indirect legitimacy,” Erdoğan’s adviser Mehmet Ucum said during a conversation with reporters and others in Istanbul this week. “In the new system, society will elect the parliament and the government — so, direct legitimacy,” he said.

    An ‘impartial’ judiciary?

    At first glance, Turkey’s highly politicized justice system would be changed for the better under the new constitution. Military courts in peacetime would be abolished. Moreover, courts would have to act “on condition of impartiality” — but critics say this amendment is rendered meaningless by the new powers granted to the president.

    The new constitution would enable Erdoğan to appoint four of 13 members of the Council of Judges and Prosecutors — the judiciary’s top disciplinary board overseeing appointment and dismissal of judges and public prosecutors — in addition to the minister and undersecretary of justice, who also sit on the Council. The remaining seven members are elected by parliament.

    The proposed changes are projected to come into effect in 2019 and Erdoğan could, therefore, rule Turkey until 2029.

    Currently, Erdoğan chooses only three appointees of a 22-member board — but the constitution requires him to make politically neutral choices. With the impartiality clause gone, the Venice Commission warned, the president could control the entire board if his party held a three-fifths majority in parliament. (The AKP is 13 seats short of a three-fifths majority.)

    “That would place the independence of the judiciary in serious jeopardy,” the commission’s report concluded. “Getting control over this body… means getting control over judges and public prosecutors.”

    Besides transforming Turkey into a presidential republic, the new constitution includes a series of minor changes, including lowering the minimum age for MP candidates from 25 to 18 and increasing the number of seats in parliament from 550 to 600.

    Some 12,000 women filled on March 5 an Istanbul arena in support of a Yes vote in the referendum | Ozan Kose/AFP via Getty Images

    Parliamentary elections would be held every five years instead of every four, with presidential elections taking place simultaneously. A president would only be allowed to stay in office for two full terms but would be permitted to stand for a de facto third term, in case of early elections.

    The proposed changes are projected to come into effect in 2019 and Erdoğan could, therefore, rule Turkey until 2029 — that is if the referendum passes: current polls predict a close race, with the “no” vote slightly ahead of the government’s “yes” camp.